Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 253 views

    2008 Positivist Paradigm

    Uploaded by

    Kesto Loriak
    The positivist paradigm emerged in the 19th century and asserts that reality can only be understood through empirical observation and scientific methods. It was influenced by philosophers like Hume and Descartes but had an internal inconsistency between describing reality as composed of independent events versus being ordered and interconnected. This inconsistency, along with issues applying it to social sciences, led to its abandonment in favor of approaches like critical multiplism that use multiple methods. Positivism was still influential in early 20th century social sciences by focusing on observable symptoms rather than underlying causes.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    2008 Positivist Paradigm

    Uploaded by

    Kesto Loriak
    253 views1 page
    The positivist paradigm emerged in the 19th century and asserts that reality can only be understood through empirical observation and scientific methods. It was influenced by philosophers like Hume and Descartes but had an internal inconsistency between describing reality as composed of independent events versus being ordered and interconnected. This inconsistency, along with issues applying it to social sciences, led to its abandonment in favor of approaches like critical multiplism that use multiple methods. Positivism was still influential in early 20th century social sciences by focusing on observable symptoms rather than underlying causes.

    Original Description:

    positivism and its criticism

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The positivist paradigm emerged in the 19th century and asserts that reality can only be understood through empirical observation and scientific methods. It was influenced by philosophers like Hume and Descartes but had an internal inconsistency between describing reality as composed of independent events versus being ordered and interconnected. This inconsistency, along with issues applying it to social sciences, led to its abandonment in favor of approaches like critical multiplism that use multiple methods. Positivism was still influential in early 20th century social sciences by focusing on observable symptoms rather than underlying causes.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    253 views1 page

    2008 Positivist Paradigm

    Uploaded by

    Kesto Loriak
    The positivist paradigm emerged in the 19th century and asserts that reality can only be understood through empirical observation and scientific methods. It was influenced by philosophers like Hume and Descartes but had an internal inconsistency between describing reality as composed of independent events versus being ordered and interconnected. This inconsistency, along with issues applying it to social sciences, led to its abandonment in favor of approaches like critical multiplism that use multiple methods. Positivism was still influential in early 20th century social sciences by focusing on observable symptoms rather than underlying causes.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    You are on page 1of 1

    Leong (Encyc)-Vol -2 (Pat 2)-45523.

    qxd 1/2/2008 8:38 PM Page 343

    Positivist Paradigm———343

    that context). While the results obtained using experi-


    POSITIVIST PARADIGM mental methods provide valuable insights into the
    nature of reality, those results may lack external validity.
    Positivism emerged as a philosophical paradigm in the That is, the relations observed in the laboratory may not
    19th century with Auguste Comte’s rejection of meta- be the same in the more complicated external world
    physics and his assertion that only scientific knowledge where a much greater number of factors interact.
    can reveal the truth about reality. It was later formally A positivist dealing with complex social problems
    established as the dominant scientific method in the such as unemployment and crime would be concerned
    early part of the 20th century by members of the Vienna with their visible manifestations (i.e., the unemployed
    Circle, including Gustav Bergmann, Rudolf Carnap, individual or criminal who can be sensed or per-
    Herbert Feigl, Philipp Frank, Karl Menger, Otto ceived) rather than with the underlying causal mecha-
    Neurath, and Moritz Schlick. nisms that are invisible to us. Hence, positivist
    The Vienna Circle sought to construct a unified sci- prescriptions tend to treat the symptoms rather than
    entific world-conception that rejects the use of philoso- the root cause of the problem.
    phy as a means of learning about the true nature of Positivism exerted an important influence on
    reality. Unfortunately, it failed as a coherent philosophy scientific practice in the social sciences for decades in
    of science because of a critical inconsistency between the early 20th century. This was especially true in the
    its theory of “reality” and its theory of “knowledge.” natural sciences where laboratory experiments can
    Positivism adopted David Hume’s theory of the closely approximate the real world environment, thus
    nature of reality (i.e., philosophical ontology). Hume allowing for accurate predictions. In the social sci-
    believed that reality consists of atomistic (micro-level) ences, however, human volition and uncertainty make
    and independent events. He believed in the use of the the laboratory experiment less reliable. Ultimately, its
    senses to generate knowledge about reality (i.e., scien- internal inconsistency resulted in the abandonment of
    tific method). He thought that philosophical and logi- positivism in favor of scientific approaches such as
    cal reasoning could lead us to “see” nonexisting links critical multiplism, which is based on the belief that
    between events occurring simultaneously. However, no one approach is ever sufficient for developing a
    positivism also adopted René Descartes’s epistemol- valid understanding of a phenomenon. The applica-
    ogy (i.e., theory of knowledge). Descartes believed tion of critical judgment in investigating multiple
    that reason is the best way to generate knowledge research questions using multiple measures, samples,
    about reality. His deductive method implies that events designs, and analyses are necessary to permit a con-
    are ordered and interconnected, and therefore reality is vergence on a valid understanding of a phenomenon.
    ordered and deducible. This internal inconsistency
    eventually undermined the validity of positivism. Fadhel Kaboub
    The positivist paradigm asserts that real events can
    See also Behavioral Observation Methods, Assessment (v1);
    be observed empirically and explained with logical
    Evidence-Based Treatments (v2); Empirically Based
    analysis. The criterion for evaluating the validity of a Professional Practice (v1); Psychometric Properties (v2);
    scientific theory is whether our knowledge claims (i.e., Qualitative Methodologies (v1); Quantitative
    theory-based predictions) are consistent with the infor- Methodologies (v1)
    mation we are able to obtain using our senses. Positivist
    research methodology (methodological individualism)
    emphasizes micro-level experimentation in a lablike Further Readings
    environment that eliminates the complexity of the exter- Descartes, R. (1998). Discourse on method and meditations
    nal world (e.g., social, psychological, and economic on first philosophy (4th ed; Donald A. Cress, Trans.).
    linkages between unemployment, and crime or suicide). Indianapolis, IN: Hackett. (Original work published 1637)
    Policies are then prescribed based on conclusions Hume, D. (1993). An enquiry concerning human
    derived via the “scientific method” (e.g., job training for understanding (2nd ed.; Eric Steinberg, Ed.). Indianapolis,
    the unemployed, antidepressants for the suicidal, and IN: Hackett. (Original work published 1777)
    jail time for the criminal). Psychologists now realize Neurath, O. (1973). The scientific conception of the world:
    that this yields results that have internal validity (i.e., the The Vienna Circle. In M. Neurath & R. Cohen (Eds.),
    relations observed in the experiment are valid within Empiricism and sociology. Boston: Reidel.

    You might also like

    pFad - Phonifier reborn

    Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

    Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


    Alternative Proxies:

    Alternative Proxy

    pFad Proxy

    pFad v3 Proxy

    pFad v4 Proxy