The Supreme Court upheld the lower court's decision to admit the will of Tomasa Elizaga Yap Caong to probate. While one doctor testified that she showed signs of insanity the day before signing the will, multiple witnesses said she was of sound mind and memory when she signed it. The court found the witnesses who said she signed it voluntarily and was in possession of her faculties to have more weight. The burden was on those opposing the will to prove she was not of sound mind, which the court did not find was met based on the conflicting testimony.
The Supreme Court upheld the lower court's decision to admit the will of Tomasa Elizaga Yap Caong to probate. While one doctor testified that she showed signs of insanity the day before signing the will, multiple witnesses said she was of sound mind and memory when she signed it. The court found the witnesses who said she signed it voluntarily and was in possession of her faculties to have more weight. The burden was on those opposing the will to prove she was not of sound mind, which the court did not find was met based on the conflicting testimony.
The Supreme Court upheld the lower court's decision to admit the will of Tomasa Elizaga Yap Caong to probate. While one doctor testified that she showed signs of insanity the day before signing the will, multiple witnesses said she was of sound mind and memory when she signed it. The court found the witnesses who said she signed it voluntarily and was in possession of her faculties to have more weight. The burden was on those opposing the will to prove she was not of sound mind, which the court did not find was met based on the conflicting testimony.
The Supreme Court upheld the lower court's decision to admit the will of Tomasa Elizaga Yap Caong to probate. While one doctor testified that she showed signs of insanity the day before signing the will, multiple witnesses said she was of sound mind and memory when she signed it. The court found the witnesses who said she signed it voluntarily and was in possession of her faculties to have more weight. The burden was on those opposing the will to prove she was not of sound mind, which the court did not find was met based on the conflicting testimony.
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as doc, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 1
YAP TUA vs.
YAP CA KUAN and YAP CA LLU ISSUE:
[G.R. No. 6845. September 1, 1914.] JOHNSON, J.: Whether or not the court erred in declaring that the testator had clear knowledge and knew what she was doing at the time of signing the will. FACTS: August, 1909, one Perfecto Gabriel, representing the petitioner, Yap Tua, HELD: presented a petition in the Court of First Instance of the city of Manila, NO. Article 800 of the Civil Code states that: asking that the will of Tomasa Elizaga Yap Caong be admitted to probate, as the last will and testament of Tomasa Elizaga Yap Caong, deceased. “The law presumes that every person is of sound mind, in the absence of proof to the contrary. Tomasa Elizaga Yap Caong died in the city of Manila on the 11th day of August, 1909. The burden of proof that the testator was not of sound mind at the time of making his dispositions is on the person who opposes the probate of the will; Together with the petition was the will, signed by deceased, as well as but if the testator, one month, or less, before making his will was publicly Anselmo Zacarias, Severo Tabora, and Timoteo Paez. known to be insane, the person who maintains the validity of the will must prove that the testator made it during a lucid interval.” During the hearing, Timoteo Paez and Pablo Agustin declared that they knew the said Tomasa Elizaga Yap Caong; that she had died on the 11th We find the same conflict in the declarations of the witnesses which we found day of August, 1909; that before her death she had executed a last will and with reference to the undue influence. While the testimony of Dr. Papa is very testament; that he was present at the time of the execution of the same; strong relating to the mental condition of Tomasa Elizaga Yap Caong, yet, that he had signed the will as a witness; that Aselmo Zacarias and Severo nevertheless, his testimony related to a time perhaps twenty-four hours Tabora had also signed said will as witnesses and that they had signed the before the execution of the will in question (Exhibit A). Several witnesses will in the presence of the deceased; that the said Tomasa Elizaga Yap testified that at the time the will was presented to her for her signature, she Caong signed the will voluntarily; and in their judgment, she was in the was of sound mind and memory and asked for a pen and ink and kept the possession of her faculties; that there were no threats or intimidation used will in her possession for ten or fifteen minutes and finally signed it. The to induce her to sign the will; that she signed it voluntarily. lower court found that there was a preponderance of evidence sustaining the conclusion that Tomasa Elizaga Yap Caong was of sound mind and memory It was ordered that the last will and testament of Tomasa Elizaga Yap and in the possession of her faculties at the time she signed this will. In view Caong be allowed and admitted to probate. of the conflict in the testimony of the witnesses and the finding of the lower court, we do not feel justified in reversing his conclusions upon that question. From the record it appears that no further proceedings were had until the 28th of February, 1910, when Yap Ca Kuan and Yap Ca Llu appeared and Upon a full consideration of the record, we find that a preponderance of the presented a petition, alleging that they were interested in the matters of the proof shows that Tomasa Elizaga Yap Caong did execute, freely and sail will and desired to intervene asked that a guardian ad litem be voluntarily, while she was in the right use of all of her faculties, the will dated appointed to represented them in the cause. August 11, 1909 (Exhibit A). Therefore the judgment of the lower court admitting said will to probate is hereby affirmed with costs. The court appointed guardian ad litem of said parties, Gabriel La O, appeared in court and presented a motion in which he alleged, in (Kate) substance:
XXX
(b) Because at the time of the execution of the will, the said Tomasa Elizaga Yap Caong was not then mentally capacitated to execute the same, due to her sickness.
G.R. No. 192100 REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES, Represented by The DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND HIGHWAYS (DPWH), vs. ASIA PACIFIC INTEGRATED STEEL CORPORATION