0% found this document useful (0 votes)
63 views

Solution: Permeability Vs % Thickness

This document contains: 1) A table showing the layer thickness, permeability, cumulative thickness, and percentage of thickness for a 10-layer system. 2) A graph showing permeability varies inversely with the square of the percentage of cumulative thickness. 3) Calculations determining the permeability at 50% and 84.1% of cumulative thickness based on the curve. 4) The vertical invasion efficiency is calculated as 68.4% based on the given graph.

Uploaded by

ahmed
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
63 views

Solution: Permeability Vs % Thickness

This document contains: 1) A table showing the layer thickness, permeability, cumulative thickness, and percentage of thickness for a 10-layer system. 2) A graph showing permeability varies inversely with the square of the percentage of cumulative thickness. 3) Calculations determining the permeability at 50% and 84.1% of cumulative thickness based on the curve. 4) The vertical invasion efficiency is calculated as 68.4% based on the given graph.

Uploaded by

ahmed
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

SOLUTION

% of
Permeability of Cumulative
Layer # Layer Thickness thickness
the layer (md) thickness with k
(ft) ft
1 3 365 0 -
2 3 275 3 11.11111111
3 3 165 6 22.22222222
4 3 121 9 33.33333333
5 3 73 12 44.44444444
6 3 37 15 55.55555556
7 3 19 18 66.66666667
8 3 9.3 21 77.77777778
9 3 3.5 24 88.88888889
10 3 1.9 27 100

Permeability vs % thickness
1000
f(x) = 143626.203545496 x^-2.2157926785
R² = 0.8326825461

100
Perm (k)

10

1
10 100
% thicknes s wi th greater k

For permeability variation:

k(50) = 24.6783168478
k(84.1) = 7.7962389014

V= 0.6840854687 68.40%
For vertical invasion efficiencies

By using the graph given in question


At V = 0.684

M Vetical invasion efficiency


100 0.1
50 0.16
30 0.22
20 0.3
10 0.43
5 0.59
4 0.63
3 0.7
2 0.74
0.1 0.9

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy