Intellectual Property Rights and Hostile Takeover
Intellectual Property Rights and Hostile Takeover
Intellectual Property Rights and Hostile Takeover
(WIPO)
As a general rule, patent is a government document describing an invention which is considered useful to
society
It gives the inventor the exclusive rights to manufacture, trade, sell and use of such invention
"constitutes those original creative works that have economic value and are protected by law..."
- Legal document granted by the government giving the inventor an exclusive right to make, use, sell an
invention for a specified number of years and to stop others from making, using or selling an invention
within its jurisdiction for a limited period of time.
- The goal of the patent is to encourage investors to advance the state of technology by awarding them
special rights to benefit from their inventions
Upholding Intellectual
Property Rights
Intellectual Property Law
1. They reward the creators of original works by preventing others from copying, performing or distributing
those words without permission.
2. They also provide incentives for people to produce scientific and creative works that benefit the society.
• Patent Law- protects inventions that demonstrate technological progress (20 years)
• Copyright Law – protects a variety of literary and artistic works, including paintings, sculpture, prose,
poetry, play, musical compositions, dances photographs, motion pictures, radio and TV programs, sound
recordings, and computer software programs. (lasts for the life of the authors/ creator + 50 years)
• Trademark Law- protects words and symbols that serve to identify different brands of goods and service
in the marketplace (trademark right never expire)
•Trade Secret Law – protects confidential information that belongs to a business and gives that business
a competitive advantage.
-bootlegging, plagiarism (or making a copy of the text of a book), performing a play without permission,
performance or display of any copyrighted work without permission of the owner or without compulsory
license.
What is copyright?
Patent Law
-is one branch of the larger legal field known as intellectual property which also include trademark and
copyright law.
- Machines, articles of manufacture, methods, composition of matter, any field of human activity which is
new or improvements to any of these.
What is Trademark?
5 Branches of Intellectual Property
R.A 165 (June 20, 1947)
- created the Philippine Patent Office
Prescribed the rules and regulations for the issuance of patents
E.O no. 133
- transferred to Bureau of Patents, trademarks, technology.
Transfers in Feb. 27, 1987
Any word or symbol used by manufacturers or sellers to identify their goods and distinguish them from
goods of others.
What marks may be registered?
Words, names and first names; signatures, numbers; acronyms; letters or combination of letters' number
and signs' logos; slogans; designs; figures; portraits of people; labels; etc.
What mark may not be registered?
- if there are more than one applicant, all of them should be named but anyone may sign the application
in behalf of all.
if any person is a juridical person, any of officer may sign the application.
What is the term of the registration of a mark?
a certificate of registration shall remain in force for 10 years, provided that, without need of any notice
from the Bureau of Trademarks, the applicants shall file a declaration of actual use and evidence that
effect within one year from the 5th anniversary of the date of registration of the mark
-If he failed to use the mark, he should mail an AFFIDAVIT OF NON-USE with the Bureau of Trademarks.
- Skills and training that an employee acquired an developed from his work experience in the company
are not trade secrets.
Piracy
Motives in pirating a “LOADED” employee/officer of competitor?
(1) The company wants the experience and skills of employee.
(2) Wants to acquire its competitor’s trade secret.
What is counterfeiting?
-Criminal offense of making an imitation of an article with intent to defraud others into accepting it as the
genuine item.
Upholding Intellectual property Rights
Morality
According to Article 27 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, "everyone has the right to the
protection of the moral and material interests resulting from any scientific, literary or artistic production of
which he is the author. Although the relationship between intellectual property and human rights is a
complex one, there are moral arguments for intellectual property. The arguments that justify intellectual
property fall into three major categories. Personality theorists believe intellectual property is an extension
of an individual. Utilitarians believe that intellectual property stimulates social progress and pushes people
to further innovation.Lockeans argue that intellectual property is justified based on deservedness and
hard work.Various moral justifications for private property can be used to argue in favor of the morality of
intellectual property, such as:
"Personality" Argument
: this argument is based on a quote from Hegel: "Every man has the right to turn his will upon a thing or
make the thing an object of his will, that is to say, to set aside the mere thing and recreate it as his own".
European intellectual property law is shaped by this notion that ideas are an "extension of oneself and of
one’s personality"
.Personality theorists argue that by being a creator of something one is inherently at risk and vulnerable
for having their ideas and designs stolen and/or altered. Intellectual property protects these moral
claimsthat have to do with personality.Lysander Spooner (1855) argues "that a man has a natural and
absolute right
—
and if anatural and absolute, then necessarily a perpetual, right
—
of property, in the ideas, of which he is the discoverer or creator; that his right of property, in ideas, is
intrinsically the same as, and stands on identically the same grounds with, his right of property in material
things; that no distinction, of principle, exists between the two cases".
A manufacturing firm for example, is morally guilty of unfair competition and as such may also be liable for
civil damages when it clothes its goods with a nice appearance so as its goods, gives them general
apperance of goods of another manufacturer (either as to the goods themselves or in the packaging),
which would likely influence the buyers to believe that the goods offered are those of a world class
manufacturer, then (in simple words) that firm is cheating. Unfortunately, manufacturing selling fake
signature products such as Giordano t-shirts, Armani sweaters, Lacoste jackets, Nike shoes are notorious
examples of unfair competition widespread in the Philippines, Hongkong and Taiwan. So is the
counterfeiting of CDs and DVDs. Manufacturers preferred to be great imitators than original creators. The
examples here are not intended to give an exhaustive list of all type of potentially anticompetitive
agreement, but simply to indicate sorts of arrangement, which are
commonly prohibited or controlled by applicable antitrust laws. You have to seek advice in your own jurisd
iction on the locally applicable laws where any activity has an adverse impact on the normal competitive
process. It will be apparent that the question of corporate social responsibility has something to do with
what is legal, particularly when the government does something to protect the fairness of a competition. In
this case, the social responsibility of business is incorporated into law. That is to say that the ethical
question, which is an important aspect of fair competition, is enforced by the exigency of the legal system.
What is a Copyright?
Copyright is technically a branch of law granting authors the exclusive privilege to reproduce, distribute,
perform or display their creative works. The goal of copyright law is to encourage authors to invest effort
in creating new works of art and literature. Copyright is one branch of the larger legal field known as
intellectual property. The law that covers it is the legal foundation protecting the work of many major
industries,
including book publishing, motion pictures production, and music recording and computer software
development.
What is Patent?
Patent works like a protective shield that drives our investors and scientist to go aheadwith confidence
and boldness, in their quest for scientific discoveries and technologicaladvancement.Patent is a legal
document granted by the government giving the inventor an exclusiveright to make, use and sell an
invention for a specified number of years. Patent protection has
great economic importance to a number of industries that rely on technological innovation toremain
competitive, such as chemical, pharmaceutical and computer industries.
What is a trademark?
Trademark is any word or symbol use by manufacturers or sellers to identify their goodsand distinguish
them from the goods of others. Examples of well-known trademarks includeCoca-cola for soft drinks,
Kodak for film, Nike for footwear and Micrisoft for software.
HOSTILE TAKEOVER
WHAT IT IS:
A hostile takeover is a type of corporate acquisition or merger which is carried out against the wishes of
the board (and usually management) of the target company.
In a hostile takeover, the target company's board of directors rejects the offer, but the bidder continues to
pursue the acquisition.
A bidder may initiate a hostile takeover through a tender offer, which means that the bidder proposes to
purchase the target company's stock at a fixed price above the current market price. Another method of
hostile takeover is acquiring a majority interest in the stock of the company on the open market. If that is
impossible or just too expensive, a bidder may initiate a proxy fight, which means that the bidder
persuades enough shareholders to replace the management of the company with one which will approve
the acquisition.
WHY IT MATTERS:
Most acquisitions and mergers occur in the business world by mutual agreement -- both sides agree that
all of the shareholder's interests are served best by the transaction. In those instances, both sides have a
chance to evaluate the costs and benefits, assets and liabilities, and proceed with full knowledge of the
risks and returns.
However, in a hostile takeover, because the management and board of the target company resist the
acquisition, they usually do not share any information that is not already publicly available. As a result, the
acquiring firm takes a risk and may unwittingly acquire debts or serious technical problems.
In addition, the loss of key managers and leadership within the company may cause a shakeup within the
target company that may disrupt its operations and threaten its viability.
Hostile takeovers don’t often work, but even so, keen negotiators regularly turn bidding wars into
ignominious battles
Topping our list of the five most hostile takeovers is the AOL and Time Warner deal from 2000. Despite
the new group's promising start, AOL Time Warner suffered severe profit blows, a stark reminder that not
all hostile takeovers reap riches
Hostile takeovers have fallen out of favour in recent years, as confidence amongst corporate leaders
shrank during the financial crisis. But now Pfizer is preparing to embark on a no-holds barred battle for
the hostile takeover of Astra-Zeneca, so we look back at some of the biggest attempted takeovers of the
past decade.
When AOL announced it was taking over the much larger and successful Time Warner, it was hailed the
deal of the millennium. But the dotcom boom meant the new AOL Time Warner lost over $200bn in value
in less than two years.
Sanofi fought hard to takeover biotechnology company Genzyme in 2010. It had to offer significantly more
per share than they initially wanted before triggering a top-up option to assume control over around 90
percent of its target company.
In a battle for control over the New York Stock Exchange, Nasdaq was determined to undermine
Deustche Borse’s bid to buy the NYSE parent company with an unsolicited and valuable bid. Nasdaq was
ultimately forced to withdraw its $13.4bn offer amid concerns from regulators.
When Clorox refused Icahn’s bid of $10bn, CEO Carl Icahn sent a full-caps letter to the Clorox board
directly telling them shareholders should decide on the takeover. Though the bid was eventually raised to
$11.7bn, Icahn was eventually forced to withdraw and drop the push for a proxy fight.
Airgas was forced to take Air Products to court in Delaware to avoid the hostile takeover, after the buyer
attempted to seal the deal over the course of a year. The main point of contention was the price per share
Air Products was offering, and eventually a judge sided with the short-changed seller.