MFI Reporting Standards Adoption Process June 2009

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 4

Financial Services Working Group - Microfinance Reporting Standards Initiative

MFI Reporting Standards


Setting & Adoption Process

The following describes the Reporting Standards Adoption Process for the microfinance
industry. The process is adapted from the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB),
based upon the process they currently use, which has been shaped from more than 30 years of
standards development experience. It also incorporates the successful practices used in
developing the standards published in the microfinance industry 2005 publication, called the
Framework1. IASB standard-setting processes are documented in the publications -- “Due
Process Handbook for the IASB” and the “Who Are We and What Do We Do?” -- both uploaded
to the FSWG workspace.

This document is organized into the following sections:


A. Overall Process
B. Standards Setting in six Steps

The Microfinance Reporting Standards Initiative places high value on transparency and public
inclusion and seeks common ground for standards setting. The objective of the process is to
find the highest level of agreement of value for the most people and institutions world-wide.
Review from all stakeholder groups and input from topic experts ensure technical integrity,
promote brand recognition, build trust and greater participation and adoption, and facilitate
continued investment.

The standards-setting and -adoption process is actively managed by a centralized


administration, called the Secretariat. The Secretariat leads communications, marketing,
gathering input and feedback, and the coordination of working groups, stakeholder
representatives and topic experts.

The procedures are reviewed regularly and updated as needed. At a minimum, the reporting
standard-setting process is officially reviewed and evaluated on an annual basis through
stakeholder feedback, assessing challenges in adoption or compliance, and evaluation of the
sector’s changing information needs. This annual evaluation culminates approximately in
November of each year.

1
Measuring Performance of Microfinance Institutions, A Framework for Reporting, Analysis and Monitoring,
March 2005.

MFI Standards Setting and Adoption Process 1|Page


A. OVERALL PROCESS

B. STANDARD SETTING IN SIX STEPS

In general there are six steps in setting reporting standards. They are illustrated above and
narrated in summary below:

1) Setting the Agenda. The agenda for reporting standards adoption and new business is
managed by the Financial Reporting Standards Initiative, a collegial body that represents
the full range of microfinance stakeholders.2 Agenda items are prioritized based upon their:
• relevance to users of the information, particularly investors and managers;
manage
• stakeholder input;
• reliability of information in order to reach a universal standard
standard; and
• possibility
ossibility of increasing convergence in the field towards uniform reporting.
reporting

2
The Initiative is currently hosted by SEEP Network. The Secretariat’s is under the umbrella of SEEP’s Financial
Services Working Group, which provides practitioner input, technical assistance and facilitates broader
b stakeholder
engagement. http://seepnetwork.org/Pages/Initiatives/FinancialReportingStandardInitiative.aspx
ttp://seepnetwork.org/Pages/Initiatives/FinancialReportingStandardInitiative.aspx

MFI Standards Setting and Adoption Process 2|Page


2) Project Planning. The Secretariat facilitates project planning, developing a three-year plan
and updating it on a rolling annual basis. The Secretariat also coordinates other relevant
programmatic activities, including representation at industry events, communications,
promotion, meetings, etc. An annual plan is developed each December to address topics of
work for the following year:
• research and development;
• discussion, debate, and/or technical expertise;
• public consultations;
• release and dissemination; and
• education, publication, and promotion of new reporting standards.

3) Discussion Paper (if necessary). This step is taken only if there is not clarity or uniformity
for a standard. It provides an initial exploration, as well as a mechanism for public comment
before an official standard is proposed. A public comment period is officially set for 90
days. This step is undertaken if funding is available to the discretion of the standards body
in order to provide:
• first publication in a new topic;
• comprehensive overview of an issue; and
• invite public comment before a formal standard proposal.

4) Exposure Draft. The proposed new standards are documented in an exposure draft. This
draft has the suggested new language for standards, as well as rationale, application,
illustrations, and examples. It is circulated with the explicit purpose of public comment and
input; a public comment period of 90 days is officially set. All formal comments are
aggregated into a public document with an official response. The purpose of this step is to:
• maintain a vehicle for consulting the public;
• set out a specific proposal;
• invite comments on a draft standard from various stakeholder groups; and
• provide a means to seek consensus among various stakeholders.

5) Standards Publications with Procedures. A review is made of all comments submitted


through Step 4, above. The Secretariat facilitates the final draft with input from the
Financial Reporting Standards Initiative, including technical experts if needed and
practitioners via SEEP’s Financial Services Working Group sub-committee under which this
initiative is housed. Assent and approval of the final version is made by the Initiative
stakeholder representatives. The final version includes an adoption of edits, record of the
public response period and mechanism (if necessary), effective dates, and documented
procedures.

MFI Standards Setting and Adoption Process 3|Page


6) Standards Adoption. Once there is a standards publication, the adoption process begins.
The Secretariat will assume responsibility for the publication, dissemination, and promotion
of updated standards. This includes education to inform microfinance stakeholders about
this new standard and its procedures. It also includes formal presentations, trainings,
online discussions, public promotion, and so forth. Successful implementation requires
coordination with numerous industry stakeholders, as well as regular meetings.

The six-step process allows for gradual advancement of priorities and concepts. In addition,
there is a regular and consistent procedure for public input. The emphasis is on transparency,
reliability, full stakeholder engagement, and systematic processes in order to maximize public
trust, acceptance and adoption. In particular:
• There is regular and consistent demand/query/request/call for public and stakeholder
input.
• Reporting Standards Initiative: the microfinance representative stakeholder body will
document all meetings, work, proceedings, and make materials available to anyone.
• Formal comments made in the standards-setting process are all publicly available,
reviewed by the appropriate working groups, responded to by the body, and – when
appropriate – adopted into the standards documentation.
• The work of the Initiative, its working processes, and activities are publicly available.
• The goal of the process is to maximize public adoption of new standards.

MFI Standards Setting and Adoption Process 4|Page

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy