MFI Reporting Standards Adoption Process June 2009
MFI Reporting Standards Adoption Process June 2009
MFI Reporting Standards Adoption Process June 2009
The following describes the Reporting Standards Adoption Process for the microfinance
industry. The process is adapted from the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB),
based upon the process they currently use, which has been shaped from more than 30 years of
standards development experience. It also incorporates the successful practices used in
developing the standards published in the microfinance industry 2005 publication, called the
Framework1. IASB standard-setting processes are documented in the publications -- “Due
Process Handbook for the IASB” and the “Who Are We and What Do We Do?” -- both uploaded
to the FSWG workspace.
The Microfinance Reporting Standards Initiative places high value on transparency and public
inclusion and seeks common ground for standards setting. The objective of the process is to
find the highest level of agreement of value for the most people and institutions world-wide.
Review from all stakeholder groups and input from topic experts ensure technical integrity,
promote brand recognition, build trust and greater participation and adoption, and facilitate
continued investment.
The procedures are reviewed regularly and updated as needed. At a minimum, the reporting
standard-setting process is officially reviewed and evaluated on an annual basis through
stakeholder feedback, assessing challenges in adoption or compliance, and evaluation of the
sector’s changing information needs. This annual evaluation culminates approximately in
November of each year.
1
Measuring Performance of Microfinance Institutions, A Framework for Reporting, Analysis and Monitoring,
March 2005.
In general there are six steps in setting reporting standards. They are illustrated above and
narrated in summary below:
1) Setting the Agenda. The agenda for reporting standards adoption and new business is
managed by the Financial Reporting Standards Initiative, a collegial body that represents
the full range of microfinance stakeholders.2 Agenda items are prioritized based upon their:
• relevance to users of the information, particularly investors and managers;
manage
• stakeholder input;
• reliability of information in order to reach a universal standard
standard; and
• possibility
ossibility of increasing convergence in the field towards uniform reporting.
reporting
2
The Initiative is currently hosted by SEEP Network. The Secretariat’s is under the umbrella of SEEP’s Financial
Services Working Group, which provides practitioner input, technical assistance and facilitates broader
b stakeholder
engagement. http://seepnetwork.org/Pages/Initiatives/FinancialReportingStandardInitiative.aspx
ttp://seepnetwork.org/Pages/Initiatives/FinancialReportingStandardInitiative.aspx
3) Discussion Paper (if necessary). This step is taken only if there is not clarity or uniformity
for a standard. It provides an initial exploration, as well as a mechanism for public comment
before an official standard is proposed. A public comment period is officially set for 90
days. This step is undertaken if funding is available to the discretion of the standards body
in order to provide:
• first publication in a new topic;
• comprehensive overview of an issue; and
• invite public comment before a formal standard proposal.
4) Exposure Draft. The proposed new standards are documented in an exposure draft. This
draft has the suggested new language for standards, as well as rationale, application,
illustrations, and examples. It is circulated with the explicit purpose of public comment and
input; a public comment period of 90 days is officially set. All formal comments are
aggregated into a public document with an official response. The purpose of this step is to:
• maintain a vehicle for consulting the public;
• set out a specific proposal;
• invite comments on a draft standard from various stakeholder groups; and
• provide a means to seek consensus among various stakeholders.
The six-step process allows for gradual advancement of priorities and concepts. In addition,
there is a regular and consistent procedure for public input. The emphasis is on transparency,
reliability, full stakeholder engagement, and systematic processes in order to maximize public
trust, acceptance and adoption. In particular:
• There is regular and consistent demand/query/request/call for public and stakeholder
input.
• Reporting Standards Initiative: the microfinance representative stakeholder body will
document all meetings, work, proceedings, and make materials available to anyone.
• Formal comments made in the standards-setting process are all publicly available,
reviewed by the appropriate working groups, responded to by the body, and – when
appropriate – adopted into the standards documentation.
• The work of the Initiative, its working processes, and activities are publicly available.
• The goal of the process is to maximize public adoption of new standards.