International Economics Script
International Economics Script
International Economics Script
MERCANTLISM
- 16TH to middle of 18th century
general idea
-> positive correlation between economic growth and wealth accumulation
zero-sum game
-> one country’s economic gain, the expense of another
2 stages :
a) BULLIONISM - 17TH century
-> bullionism -> use&exchange of precious metals
-> block imports (high tariffs and quotas) & encourage exports (subsidized)
-> (X>M -> richer country)
-> emperor wanted for each economic unit (craftsman) to have a positive trade balance
-> leads to stockpiling of gold/silver
-> regulation of production
-> labor control -> crafts guides -> good labor quality, ability to export, country’s wealth
-> low wages -> low production costs -> country’s products more competitive globally
-> large families -> more labor force -> subsidies & encouragement of large families
-> wealth with holdings of precious materials > nation’s product capacity
b) MATURE STAGE
-> having a positive trade balance most of the time (trade surplus) -> impossible
-> new idea -> some economic unit can have a deficit BUT COUNTRY AS A WHOLE HAS TO BE
IN SURPLUS
-> import raw materials ex. Iron, iron bars NOT final ex. Carriage -> create value -> export !
ATTACK OF David Hume -> price-specie1-flow mechanism
-> continue to accumulate profits, no harm to country’s int. competitive position
country A :
-> accumulation of precious metals, X>M - Ms P and W
-> Ms would then competitiveness in surplus country
country B : loss of precious metals, M>M - Ms P and W
-> Ms competitiviness
Ms x V(money velocity) = P(price) x Y(real output level, all Q of goods produced) (TRxGDP)
𝟏𝒄 𝟏𝒄
- 1 barrel of wine, exchanges 4 yards of cloth in ENGLAND 𝟏 = =𝟒𝒄
𝒘 𝟎.𝟐𝟓𝒘
𝟒
𝟏𝒄 𝟏𝒄
- 1 barrel of wine, exchanges 1.5 yards of cloth in PORTUGAL 𝟐 = = 𝟏. 𝟓 𝒄
𝒘 𝟎.𝟔𝟔 𝒘
𝟑
-> abs.adv. in production of wine
-> less L/h for producing wine than cloth
Benefit for both -> specialize in production in their low-cost commodity and import the
other that is cheaper to produce abroad
-> trade is not a zero-sum game -> both can benefit from trade if produce cheaper good at
home and import more expensive one
-> absolute advantages -> natural resources (ex. climate)
For example, the United States may produce 700 million gallons of wine per year, while Italy
produces 4 billion gallons of wine per year. Italy has an absolute advantage because it
produces many more gallons of wine – the output – in the same amount of time – the input
– as the United States.
Assumptions :
-> 2 countries, 2 commodities
-> fixed endowment3 of resources (labor supply is fixed)
-> fixed but different level of technology among countries
-> constant production costs (increase of output by 10%, also inputs inc. by 10%)
so the Labor hours/unit of production don’t change regardless quantity produced
-> factors of production immobile externally (sectors) – do not move between countries – a
worker from Croatia cannot go to Germany and work there the same job
while perfectly mobile internally -> in Croatia from Agrokor marketing to Adris marketing
-> labor theory of value – input/labor ratio the same in all countries
-> full employment
-> perfect competition – no one is strong enough to influence the market
-> transport costs, trade barriers not included
3 funding