Lawsuit Against Treasure Island
Lawsuit Against Treasure Island
Lawsuit Against Treasure Island
COMPLAINT
(To Enforce Payment From Produce Trust)
Anthony Marano Company (“Marano”), by and through its undersigned counsel, for its
complaint against Defendants, Treasure Island Foods, Inc. (“TIF”), Magazi Inc. t/a Treasure Island
Foods ("Magazi"), Maria A. Kamberos (“M. Kamberos”), and Christ N. Kamberos, Jr. ("C.
Kamberos") alleges:
Agricultural Commodities Act, 7 U.S.C. § 499e(c)(5), 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and 28 U.S.C. § 2201.
2. Venue in this District is based on 28 U.S.C. § 13391 in that (a) Plaintiff’s claims
PARTIES
Chicago, Illinois, is engaged in the business of buying and selling wholesale quantities of perishable
agricultural commodities (hereafter “produce”) in interstate commerce and was at all times pertinent
herein, a dealer subject to and licensed under the provisions of the Perishable Agricultural
Chicago, Illinois, is also engaged in the business of buying and selling wholesale quantities of
produce in interstate commerce and was at all times pertinent herein, a dealer subject to license
under the provisions of the PACA. Defendant TIF operates grocery stores on 55th Street in
Chicago ("Lincoln Park"), on W. Elm Street in Chicago ("Gold Coast"), on N. Lake Shore Drive
information and belief, Defendant TIF is an affiliate or related entity of Defendant Magazi,
Wilmette, Illinois, is also engaged in the business of buying and selling wholesale quantities of
produce in interstate commerce and was at all times pertinent herein, a dealer licensed under the
provisions of the PACA. Defendant Magazi operates a store on Ridge Road in Wilmette
("Wilmette") (Hyde Park, Broadway, Lincoln Park, Gold Coast, Streeterville, Old Town, and
Wilmette are hereinafter collectively referred to as the “Stores”). Upon information and belief,
Defendant Magazi is an affiliate and related entity of Defendant TIF, sharing common offices,
2
Case: 1:18-cv-06657 Document #: 1 Filed: 10/01/18 Page 3 of 8 PageID #:3
director of TIF and Magazi who controlled the day-to-day operations of TIF, Magazi, and the
Stores during the period of time in question and was in a position of control over the PACA trust
director of TIF and Magazi who controlled the day-to-day operations of TIF, Magazi, and the
Stores during the period of time in question and was in a position of control over the PACA trust
8. Between July 1, 2018 and October 1, 2018, Plaintiff sold and delivered to TIF and
Broadway $43,119.09
Streeterville $49,259.23
Wilmette $33,517.51
Total $453,062.30
10. At the time of receipt of the produce, Plaintiff became a beneficiary in a statutory
trust designed to assure payment to produce suppliers. The trust consists of all produce or
produce related assets, including all funds commingled with funds from other sources and all
3
Case: 1:18-cv-06657 Document #: 1 Filed: 10/01/18 Page 4 of 8 PageID #:4
assets procured by such funds, in the possession or control of Defendants since the creation of
this trust.
11. Plaintiff preserved its interest in the PACA trust in the principal amount of
$453,062.30 by delivering invoices or other billing statements to the Stores which contained the
language required by 7 U.S.C. § 499e(c)(4) and remains a beneficiary until full payment is made
for the produce. A representative sampling of unpaid ordinary usual invoices or other billing
statements with the requisite statutory language is attached hereto as Exhibits 1 through 7.
12. TIF, Magazi, and their common owners and officers have not disputed the debt in
any way but have failed to make payment to Plaintiff in accordance with the prompt payment
13. The failure of TIF and Magazi to pay Plaintiff demonstrates that TIF, Magazi, and
its owners and officers have failed to maintain sufficient assets in the statutory trust to pay
14. Despite demand for payment, TIF and Magazi have failed and refused to pay
Plaintiff for the wholesale quantities of produce supplied by Plaintiff. TIF and Magazi have
announced they are closing the Stores and employees were given notice that the Stores would
close on or about October 2, 2018, with complete closings by October 16, 2018.
15. The failure of the Stores to pay Plaintiff, as well as the announced closing of the
Stores, indicates that TIF and Magazi are failing to maintain sufficient assets in the statutory trust
Count I
(Failure to Pay Trust Funds)
16. Plaintiff incorporates each and every allegation set forth in paragraphs 1 to 15
4
Case: 1:18-cv-06657 Document #: 1 Filed: 10/01/18 Page 5 of 8 PageID #:5
17. The failure of TIF and Magazi to make payment to Plaintiff of trust funds in the
aggregate amount of $453,062.30 from the statutory trust is a violation of the PACA and PACA
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff requests an order enforcing payment from the trust by requiring
immediate payment of $453,062.30 to Plaintiff, and for such other and further relief as the Court
deems appropriate.
Count II
(Failure to Pay Promptly)
18. Plaintiff incorporates each and every allegation set forth in paragraphs 1 to 17
19. TIF, Magazi and the Stores received each of the shipments of produce described
above.
20. The PACA requires TIF and Magazi to tender full payment promptly to its unpaid
suppliers of produce.
21. TIF and Magazi failed to pay for the produce supplied by Plaintiff within the
payment terms.
22. As a result of the failure by TIF and Magazi to pay promptly, Plaintiff has
requirements by requiring immediate payment of $453,062.30 to Plaintiff from TIF and Magazi,
jointly and severally, and for such other and further relief as the Court deems appropriate.
5
Case: 1:18-cv-06657 Document #: 1 Filed: 10/01/18 Page 6 of 8 PageID #:6
Count III
(Failure to Pay for Goods Sold)
23. Plaintiff incorporates each and every allegation set forth in paragraphs 1 to 22
24. TIF and Magazi refused to pay Plaintiff the aggregate amount of $453,062.30
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff request judgment in favor of Plaintiff and against TIF and
Magazi, jointly and severally, in the amount of $453,062.30, and for such other and further relief
Count IV
(Unlawful Dissipation of Trust Assets
by a Corporate Official – Maria A. Kamberos)
25. Plaintiff incorporates each and every allegation set forth in paragraph 1 to 24
26. Defendant, M. Kamberos, was an owner and officer of TIF and Magazi during the
period in question and was in a position of control over the PACA trust assets belonging to
Plaintiff.
27. Defendant, M. Kamberos, failed to direct TIF and Magazi to fulfill their statutory
duties to preserve PACA trust assets and pay Plaintiff for the produce supplied.
28. Defendant, M. Kamberos', failure to direct TIF and Magazi to maintain PACA
trust assets and pay Plaintiff for the produce supplied was a breach of fiduciary duty and an
29. As a result of said unlawful dissipation of trust assets, Plaintiff has been deprived
of its rights as beneficiary in the produce trust and has been denied payment for the produce it
supplied.
6
Case: 1:18-cv-06657 Document #: 1 Filed: 10/01/18 Page 7 of 8 PageID #:7
amount of $453,062.30, and for such other and further relief as the Court deems appropriate.
Count V
(Unlawful Dissipation of Trust Assets
by a Corporate Official – Christ N. Kamberos, Jr.)
30. Plaintiff incorporates each and every allegation set forth in paragraph 1 to 29
31. Defendant, C. Kamberos, was an owner and officer of TIF and Magazi during the
period in question and was in a position of control over the PACA trust assets belonging to
Plaintiff.
32. Defendant, C. Kamberos, failed to direct TIF and Magazi to fulfill their statutory
duties to preserve PACA trust assets and pay Plaintiff for the produce supplied.
33. Defendant, C. Kamberos', failure to direct TIF and Magazi to maintain PACA
trust assets and pay Plaintiff for the produce supplied was a breach of fiduciary duty and an
34. As a result of said unlawful dissipation of trust assets, Plaintiff has been deprived
of its rights as beneficiary in the produce trust and has been denied payment for the produce it
supplied.
the amount of $453,062.30, and for such other and further relief as the Court deems appropriate.
Count VI
(Interest and Attorney’s Fees)
35. Plaintiff incorporates each and every allegation set forth in paragraphs 1 to 34
7
Case: 1:18-cv-06657 Document #: 1 Filed: 10/01/18 Page 8 of 8 PageID #:8
36. As a result of Defendants’ failure to make full payment promptly for the produce
sold and delivered to the Stores, Plaintiff has lost the use of said money.
37. As a further result of Defendants’ failure to make full payment promptly for the
produce sold and delivered to the Stores, Plaintiff has been required to pay attorneys’ fees and
costs in order to bring this action to require Defendants to comply with their statutory duties.
38. PACA and the invoices of the Plaintiff entitle Plaintiff to recover prejudgment
interest and attorneys’ fees and costs incurred to collect any balance due from Defendants.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff requests judgment against each of the Defendants, jointly and
severally, for prejudgment interest, attorneys’ fees and costs, and for such other and further relief