Statement: A Legally Adopted Child Who Is Not A Relative by Consanguinity of The 2 Statement: The Relatives by Consanguinity of The Wife Are Strangers As Far As Donor
Statement: A Legally Adopted Child Who Is Not A Relative by Consanguinity of The 2 Statement: The Relatives by Consanguinity of The Wife Are Strangers As Far As Donor
Statement: A Legally Adopted Child Who Is Not A Relative by Consanguinity of The 2 Statement: The Relatives by Consanguinity of The Wife Are Strangers As Far As Donor
32. Which of the following items is not included as part of funeral expenses for
estate tax purposes?
a. Expenses for the wake preceding the burial
b. Publication charges for death notices
c. Burial expenses borne or defrayed by relatives
d. Telecommunication expenses in informing the relatives of the deceased
33. Which of the following is not a cause for the disinheritance of children and
descendants?
a. When a child or descendant has been convicted of adultery or concubinage with
the spouse of the testator.
b. Maltreatment of the testator by word or deed, by the child or descendant.
c. When a child or descendant leads a dishonorable or disgraceful life.
d. None of the above
34. Under the partnership of gains regime, which of the following items is considered
as a conjugal property?
a. That which is brought to the marriage as his or her own
b. Those which are acquired by right of redemption, or by barter or by exchanges
with other property belonging to any one of the spouses.
c. That which acquires during the marriage by lucrative or gratuitous title.
d. Property obtained from the labor, industry, work, or profession of either or both
of the spouses.
35. I. Taxation of the estate shall be governed by the statute or law in force at the
time of distribution of the estate to the heirs.
II. The share of the surviving spouse in the conjugal property is part of the gross estate
of the surviving spouse.
a. Both statements are true c. Only the first statement is true
b. Both statements are false d. Only the second statement is true
36. Which of the following is not a remedy against indirect double taxation?
a. Vanishing deduction
b. Tax credit for foreign estate tax
c. Exemption from transfer tax of merger of usufruct in the owner of the naked title
d. Transfer for public use
19 February 2017
I, Dedo Pumanaw, of legal age, and a resident of 123 Kabaong St., Kandila Ave.,
Brgy. Puntod,
Quezon City, Philippines, of sound and disposing mind, hereby executes this last will
and testament.
The executor of the married decedent presented the following information about his
estate:
Mr. Paht Hayna, single, a nonresident, not a citizen of the Philippinesm died leaving a
gross estate in the Philippines of P10,000,000 and a gross estate outside the
Philippines of P30,000,000. His expenses and transfers were: Funeral expenses outside
the Philippines of P1,000,000, mortgage of property outside the Philippines of
P2,000,000, and in the Philippines of P500,000, and transfer to the Philippine
Government of property outside the Philippines of P1,000,000.
47. The allowable deduction from the Philippine gross estate is:
a. P375,000 b. P875,000 c. P1,000,000 d. P1,500,000 e. P
P675,000
48. Ms. Vina Ngungot, a Filipino decedent, owns a property valued at P5,000,000 at
the time of her death. The said property was sold, during her lifetime to Mr. Sen Huerte
for P2,500,000 when its real value was P3,000,000. If it was agreed by both parties that
the transfer of ownership will take place after Mrs. VIna’s death. For purposes of
Philippine estate tax, the amount to be included in the gross estate would be:
a. P2,000,000 b. P2,250,000 c. P2,500,000 d.
P5,000,000
Mr. Nat Odas, a citizen and resident of the Philippines, died on October 10, 2017,
leaving the following properties, rights, obligations, and charges:
Mr. Dee Huminga, a citizen of the Philippines and a resident of Canada, under the
system of conjugal partnership of gains, died in Canada and was shipped to and buried
in the Philippines. He had the following data:
Real property in the Phil. (inherited 3 ½ years ago, with a FMV of
P700,000 when inherited) P1,000,000
Real property in Canada, family home
3,000,000
Tangible personal property in the Phil
500,000
Tangible personal property in Canada
700,000
Funeral Expenses in the Phil
110,000
Funeral Expenses in Canada
150,000
Unpaid obligations 300,000
Claims against insolvent person in the Phil.
500,000
Estate tax paid in Canada 300,000
55. The gross estate is:
a. P5,700,000 b. P5,750,000 c. P5,800,000 d.
P6,000,000
56. Mr. Sui Sayd, a citizen of the Philippines, single, died a resident of the USA,
leaving the following properties:
Real properties in USA, inherited from the mother 1 ½ years ago
P5,000,000
Personal property in the Philippines, inherited from the father
4,000,000
Family home in the United States
3,000,000
Actual funeral expenses paid in USA
150,000
Other obligation contracted within the last two years
300,000
Mr. Banky, a Filipino citizen residing in Makati, died leaving the following:
Land in Makati P2,000,000
Land in Manila 3,000,000
Gross estate-Canada 5,000,000
Deductions claimed by the estate:
Actual funeral expenses 180,000
Judicial expenses 100,000
Claims against the estate 120,000
Transfer of the land in Makati to the
Philippine Government (in decedent’s will) 2,000,000
Estate tax paid in Canada 385,000
The Land in Manila when inherited 3 ½ years ago had a value of P2,400,000 with a
mortgage thereon of P400,000 which was paid prior to Mr. Banky’s death.
57. The allowed vanishing deduction is:
a. P608,000 b. P729,600 c. P912,000 d. P1,094,000
58. The taxable net estate is:
a. P4,992,000 b. P5,992,000 c. P6,992,000 d.
P7,992,000
59. The allowed estate tax credit is:
a. P0 b. P333,587 c. P385,000 d. P421,372
How much was the tax payable on the August 15, 2017 donation?
a. P40,000 b. 50,000 c. P84,000 d. P254,000
Mr. Chito Pascual, widower, has three sons: Paul, 27 years old; Kiko, 25 years old; and Tino,
23 years old. On August 15, 2016, Mr. Pascual donated two lots, each with fair market
value of P350,000, one each to his sons, Paul and Kiko. On November 15, 2016, Mr. Pacual
gave P350,000 cash to his third son, Tino, as dowry on account of his forthcoming
marriage on December 25, 2016.
66. The donor’s tax due on the donation on August 15, 2016 is
a. P8,000 b. P21,200 c. P26,000 d. P47,200
67. The donor’s tax due to and payable on the donation on November 15, 2016 is
a. P8,000 b. P21,200 c. P26,000 d. P47,200
68. On July 17, 2016, Mr. Juan Cruz gave a property with a fair market value of
P550,000 to Anton, a legitimate son, and Ella, Anton’s bride, on accpount of their
marriage celebrated on January 3, 2017. The donor’s tax payable was:
a. P15,800 b. P38,000 c. P84,100 d. P87,100
69. Mr. John GiBB, resident citizen, made the following donations on August 11,
2016:
70. John sold his car to Sam for P200,000. John’s car cost P500,000, and had a fair
value of P400,000 at the time of sale. What was the tax consequence of the sale?
a. There was a taxable gift of P300,000
b. There was a taxable gift of P200,000
c. The transfer was for insufficient consideration, hence, not subject to donor’s tax.
d. The transfer involved a personal property, hence, not subject to donor’s tax.
71. Mr. De Guia made a donation to Red and Jaycee, son and daughter in law, on
account of marriage, of a real property with market value of P2,500,000, but subject to
a mortgage of P500,000, which was assumed by the donees. The donor’s tax amount
to:
a. P43,400 b. P300,000 c. P343,400 d. P344,000
Donor’s tax due after tax credit for foreign donor’s tax paid is:
a. P2,200 b. P2,750 c. P3,208.33 d. P4,625.50
73. Mr. & Mrs. Smith, citizens and residents of the Philippines, made the following
donations of conjugal property: