Impact of Capital Structure On Profitability
Impact of Capital Structure On Profitability
Impact of Capital Structure On Profitability
ISSN 1561-8706
Contents
Research Page No
Editorial Board
Prof. Izlin Ismail, Faculty of Business and Professor Pranas Zukauskas, Dr. Habil,
Accountancy, University of Malaya, Dean, Faculty of Economics and
Kuala Lumpur. Management, Vytautas Magnus University,
Dr. Teoman Duman, International Burch Lithuania.
University Bosnia and Herzegovina. Prof Dr. Fasihul Alam, Department of
Prof. Angelo Santagostino, University of Management Studies, University of
Brescia, Italy. Chittagong, Bangladesh.
Mr. Thomsas Winter, University of Prof. Subas K.C., Dean, Kathmandu
Rostock, Rostock, Germany. University, School of Management, Nepal
Dr. Geoff Kay, City University, London. Mr. Peter N. Stearns, Provost and Executive
Dr. D.M.Semasinghe, University of Vice President, George Mason University,
Kelaniya, Sri Lanka. Virginia.
Dr. Ziasma, University of Karachi, Ms. Deng Xinghua, Director, University
Karachi
Prof. Asim Jamal Siddiqui, University of of Science and Technology, China.
Karachi, Karachi Prof. Dr. Dietrich Steude, Fachhochschule
Professor Arshad Syed Karim, Ph.D. Erfurt University of Applied Sciences,
Dean of Social Sciences and Humanities Berlin, Germany.
Greenwich University Karachi Mr. Jurgen Gau, Dipl.-Ing., Dipl.-Wirtsch.-
Prof Anoma Abhayaratne, Department of Ing., Donarweg, Munich, Germany.
Economics and Statistics, University of Mr. Horst Stenzel, Concepts Consulting
Peradeniya, Sri Lanka. Production, Stenzelfilm, Selma-Lagerlof-
Dr. Domingos Santos, Sub-Director, STR., Munich, Germany.
Institute of Politecnico de Castelo Mr. Hartmut Wellerdt, Marketing
Branco, Portugal Consultant, Bremin University, Germany.
Dr. Javier Poncela Gonzalez, Department Dr. Silvia Scaramuzzi, Head of International
ETSI Telecomunication, University of Relations Department of Economics and
Malaga, Spain. Management, University of Florence (Italy).
Ms. Alessia Lefebure, Director Alliance
Program, Columbia University, New York
Referees
Dr. Ishrat Husain, Institute of Business Administration, Karachi
Dr. Khalid Nadvi, IDS, University of Sussex
Prof. Dr Mehtab Karim, School of Public Policy, George Mason University, USA
Dr. Peter O’ Brien, SADCC, South Africa
Prof. Sarfaraz Qureshi, Islamabad
Dr. T.M. Roepstorff, UNIDO, Vienna
Dr. Shahid Hasan Siddiqui, Research Institute for Islamic Banking and Finance
Dr. K.M. Larik, Iqra University, Karachi
Dr. Javed Iqbal, University of Karachi, Karachi
Professor Dr. Rashid A. Naeem, Chairman, Department of Economics and Management Sciences,
Allama Iqbal Open University, Islamabad
Dr. Rizwana Zahid, Government APWA College for Women, Karachi
Dr. Arshi Ali, Federal Urdu University, Karachi
Dr. Abdul Wahab Suri, University of Karachi, Karachi
Prof. Dr. Abdul Waheed, University of Karachi, Karachi
Dr. Naveed, Institute of Business Administration (IBA), Karachi
Dr. Moazzam Khan Sherwani, Institute of Environment Studies, University of Karachi
Dr. Samiuzzaman, Global Environmental Lab (Pvt) Ltd. Korangi, Karachi
Dr. Anila Ambar Malik, University of Karachi, Karachi
Dr. Seema Munaf, University of Karachi, Karachi
Dr. Nabeel A. Zubairi, University of Karachi, Karachi
Dr. Zainab F. Zadeh, Bahria University, Karachi
Prof. Dr. Mudassir-ud-din, University of Karachi, Karachi
Ms. Yasmin Zafar, Institute of Business Administration (IBA), Karachi
Dr. Uzma Parveen, University of Karachi, Karachi
Mr. Mohsin H. Ahmed, Applied Economics Research Centre, University of Karachi,
Karachi
Prof. Ghulam Hussain, University of Karachi, Karachi
Mr. Mahboob-ul-Hassan, University of Karachi, Karachi
Dr. Muhammad Mahmood, Khadim Ali Shah Bukhari Institute of Technology, Karachi
Dr. Nargis Asad, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi
Dr. Abuzar Wajidi, University of Karachi, Karachi
Ms. Rubina Feroz, University of Karachi, Karachi
Prof. Dr. Talat A. Wizarat, Institute of Business Administration (IBA), Karachi
Dr. Muhammad Zaki, University of Karachi, Karachi
Mr. H. Jaleel Zubairi, Allied Bank Ltd. , Karachi
Dr. Zaira Wahab, Iqra University, Karachi
Dr. Ismail Saad, Iqra University, Karachi
Mr. Naim Farooqui, Sindh Bank Ltd, Karachi Cont’d.
Dr. Sara Azhar, University of Karachi, Karachi
Prof. Ahmad Farooq Shah, Bahauddin Zakarya University, Multan
Mr. M. Mazhar Khan, State Bank of Pakistan, Karachi
Mr. Mohammad Soliman, University of Sciences and Technology Chittagong,
Bangladesh
Prof. Abdul Mannan, School of Business, University of Liberal Arts Bangladesh
Dr. Fatima Imam, Federal Urdu University, Karachi
Prof. G.R. Pasha, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan
Mr. Shameel Ahmad Zubairi, University of Karachi, Karachi
Mr. Imran Naveed, State Bank of Pakistan, Karachi
Production Unit
Literary Editor:
Muhammad Asif Khan
Production Associate and Editorial Co-ordinator:
Shahzad Ali
MONETARY APPROACH TO
EXCHANGE RATE DETERMINATION:
EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FROM
PAKISTAN
Ehsan Ahmed Shaikh1 & Javed Iqbal2
Abstract
This Study, empirically, investigates monetary approach
to exchange rate determination between Pak Rupee vis-à-vis US$
employing flex price Frenkel-Bilson type model. ADF unit root tests
are conducted for macroeconomic fundamentals and it is found
that all variables, namely differential money stocks, differential
industrial production and differential nominal interest rate are
integrated of order one. Hence a test of cointegration using Johansen
cointegration technique is conducted. The findings of the
cointegration test reveal that there is only one cointegrating vector.
Sign of coefficient of differential money stock came out to be positive
and statistically significant, as we hypothesized it. Similarly,
coefficient of differential industrial production is also statistically
significant but its sign comes out to be positive which is contrary to
the prediction of our model.
1.Introduction
the sticky price model they investigated in their study was Hooper
and Morton’s model of exchange rate that incorporated the current
account too. A possible reason for the poor performance of these
fundamental based monetary models may be a deviation or at least
partial deviation from uncovered interest parity condition.
The second model which has been popularized in the exchange rate
economics is Dornbusch-Frankel model.
Economic fundamentals for Dornbuch-Frenkel model is as follows;
X t A1 X t 1 A2 X t 2 . .. Ak X t k 1t ……………..6
i denotes a matrix of first differenced coef ficients. These coefficients capture short run
dynamics. Whereas represents a matrix of long-run impacts. It is worth noting that
contains information of long run relations among variables. The rank ( r ) of reveals
presence of cointegrating vectors. In case of full rank matrix, cointegration is not present.
In such case, equation 7 reduces to a VAR with all the variables in first differenced form.
However, if rank of is r where 0 < r < n, it can be factored as ' . Here and
' are n x r matrices. In Johansen procedure we obtain two likelihood ratio (LR)
statistics. The statistics are the trace statistic and the max statistic. Using these statistics,
we test for presence or absence of cointegrating and number of cointegrating vectors.
Table 1, shows results of the ADF test, for all the variables in level
form which this study uses.
Table 1
Results of ADF Unit Root Test at level
Variables Test Statistic with Test Statistic with Status
Intercept intercept and
Trend
Le ( log of Exchange rate) -1.1 03389 -3.313576 Non-Stationary
The ADF unit root results reveal that all the variables, except
US industrial production and differential industrial production, have
unit roots when only intercept is used in test statistic i.e they are
non- stationary at 5% . However, when both intercept and trend are
included in test statistic, all the variables including above mentioned
two, have unit roots at 5%. ADF has also been conducted for first
difference form. These results are shown in table 2.
Table 2
Results of ADF Test at 1st Difference Level
The results in Table 2 confirms that they are all I(1). This situation
allows us to proceed to test for cointegration of variables in our
model.
Cointegration Analysis
Hence Johansen (1988) and Johansen and Jusilius (1991)
approach is applied to estimate a vector autoregressive model, VAR,
having four dimentional vector, Xt = [ le, difip, difm2, difr ] which also
determines the cointegrating rank ρ. Besides, a dummy variable is
also included as exogenous variable, for capturing the shift in
exchange rate regime, in the estimation of VAR because Pakistan
introduced market based floating exchange rate on May 19th, 1999.
Based on Schwarz information criterion and Hannan-Quinn
information criterion for lag selection, this study selects 4 lags for
estimating VAR.
Table 3
Cointegration Rank Test (Trace)
Table 4
Cointegration Rank Test (Maximum Eigenvalue)
Max-eig envalue test indicates 1 cointegrating eqn (s) at the 0.05 level
purchasing power parity holds continuously i.e. PPP not only holds
in long run but holds in short run too. This is in stark contrast to
empirical findings.
Δste = it – it*
Table 5
VECM (1) Coefficients
References
Baldwin, R.E and Martin, P. (1999) Two Waves of Globalization:
Superficial Similarities, Fundamental Differences, NBER Working
Papers, 6904
Bilson, J.F.O. (1978), “Rational Expectations and the Exchange Rate”
in Frankel, J.A.and Harry G. J. (eds), The Economics of Exchange
Rates, Addison-Wesley
Cassel, G. (1916), On Present Situation of the Foreign Exchange,
Economic Journal, 26, 62-65
Dickey, D. and Fuller, W. (1981) “Likelihood Ratio Statistics for
Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root” Econometrica 49,
1057-1072.
Dornbusch, R.(1976) “Expectations and Exchange Rate Dynamics,”
Journal of Political Economy, 84, 1161-1176
Engle, R.F and Granger, C.W.J (1987), Cointergration and Error
Correction: Representation, estimation and testing, Econometrica
55(2) 251-276
Finn, M. (1996) “Forecasting Exchange Rate: A Monetary or random
walk Phenomenon,” Journal of International Money and Finance,
5, 181-194
Fleming, J. M. 1962. “Domestic Financial Policies Under Fixed and
Floating Exchange Rates,” IMF Staff Papers3, 369-79
Frenkel, J.A. (1976) A monetary approach to the exchange rate:
doctrinal aspects and empirical evidence. Scandinavian Journal
of Economics 78, 200-224
Granger, C.W.J and Newbold, P. (1974) Spurious regression in
econometrics, Journal of Econometrics 2(2), 111-120
Gonzalo, J. (1994) Five alternative methods of estimating long-run
equilibrium relationships, Journal of Econometrics 60, 203–233
Hafeez-ur-Rehman (2010) Impact of Foreign Direct Investment Inflow
on Equilibrium Real Exchange Rate of Pakistan, Research Journal
of South Asian Studies, 25( 1), 125-141
Hooper, P. and Morton, J. (1982) Fluctuations in the dollar: a model of
nominal and real exchange rate determination, Journal of
International Money and Finance 1, 39-56
Introduction
where taxes are taken on interest expense the value of the firm will
increase with increase in the leverage (Modigliani and Miller 1963).
Research Objective
Literature Review
Hypothesis
Ho = Long period Debt to Total Asset has no effect on profitability
H1 = Long period Debt to Total Asset has a significant effect on
profitability.
Research Methodology
This study was carried out in two sectors of Karachi Stock
exchange KSE 100 Index i.e. Cement and Automobile sector. 36 cement
and automobile companies listed in KSE. Out of which we have selected
28 companies using random sampling technique, among these 28
companies 12 companies were from automobile sector and 16 were
from cement sector for the study.
The data for the study was obtained from Annual reports i.e.
Financial statements analysis of firms listed at KSE extracted from
State Bank of Pakistan, which enfold the balance sheets data of all
listed companies of KSE for 2005 to 2011 and some of the annual
reports we obtained for the companies websites.
1. Variables
Dependent Variable
i. Return on Assets: This ratio shows that how efficiently the
firm has utilized their assets i.e. current assets and fixed assets.
The higher the value the better.ROA was also considered as
dependent variable by Majumdar and Chhibber (1999) and Abor
(2005).
Independent Variables
Sales Growth =
This ratio shows that how much of total assets have been financed
through short term loan. Taking loan is not a big concern but its
utilization. Chin Ai Fu (1997), Sohail Amjid (2007) and Rametulla
Ferati (2010) consider STDTA as independent variable in their
respective researches
STDTA =
iii. Long Term Debt Ratio: This ratio shows that how much of
total assets have been financed through long term debt. The
higher value may show the dependency of the firm on debt,
which may be a negative sign for the investors. Because they
might be thinking that the firm may go bankrupt. Rametulla Ferati
(2010).
LTDTA =
FCR =
v. Funded Debt Ratio: All those debts that company has taken
and they will mature after one accounting period or after one year
qualifies for the funded debt ratio such as bonds, long-term notes
payables or debentures. If the ratio is above 1 for FDR then it
shows higher long-term debt involvement as compared to equity
contribution. Chudson (1945),Mohamad Khan (1994) and Chin Ai
Fu (1997)
FDR =
vi. Current Debt Ratio: This ratio show that how much the
owners have contributed to pay its short term liability. Petty,
Keown, Scott and Martin (1993), Chin Ai Fu (1997)
CDR =
vii. Funded Assets Ratio: A higher ratio will show that the firm
has higher amount of assets to pay its short term liability and a
lower ratio will disappoint short period creditors from giving more
short period debt. Siegel, Shim and Hartman (1992), Mohamad
Khan (1994) and Chin Ai Fu (1997).
FAR =
= + ( )+ ( )+ ( )+ ( )+ ( )+ ( )
+ ( )+µ
Where,
ROA is the Return on Asset
STDTA is Short Term Debt to Asset Ratio
LTDTA is Long Term Debt to Asset Ratio
FCR is Funded Capital Ratio
FDR is Funded Debt Ratio
CDR is Current Debt Ratio
FAR is Funded Asset Ratio
SALES GROWTH is the persistent increase in total Sales
= + ( )+ ( )+ ( )+ ( )+ ( )+ ( )
+ ( )+µ
= + (− . )( )− . ( )− . ( )− . ( )+ . ( )−
. ( )− . ( )+ µ
1. Hausman Test
Table
1.1: Coefficient
Chi2 = 174.39
2.Heteroscedasticity Test
Ho : Constant variance
Prob>Chi2 = 0.566
Table
1.3: VIF
Table 1.4:
Model Summary
Fixed Effect Regression R-sq (With in) R-sq (Between ) R-sq (Overall)
a. Predictors: (Constant), STDTA, LTDTA. FCR, FDR, CDR, FAR and Sales Growth
5. Regression Table
Table 1.5:
Coefficients
Unstandardized Coefficients
6. Correlation Table
Table 1.6:
Correlation
STDTA 1.00
= 0.334 + ( . )( )− . ( )+ . ( )+ . ( )− . ( )
+ . ( )− . ( )+ µ
1. Hausman Test
.049
STD TA .392 .343
.003
LT DT A .138 -.142
.010
F CR .227 .216
F DR .008
.011 .004
-.002
FAR .024 .026
Chi2 = 6.83
2. Heteroscedasticity Test
Ta ble 2.2: hettest
Ho : Constan t variance
Model Summary
Random Effect R-sq (Within) R-sq (Bet ween) R-sq (Overall) F Prob>F
Regression
.527 .363 .472 108.2 .000
a. Predictors: (Constant), STDTA, LTDTA. FCR, FDR, CDR, FAR and Sales Growth
5. Regression Table
Table 2.5:
Coefficients
Unstandardized Coefficients
6. Correlation Table
Table 2.6:
Correlation
STDTA 1.00
More over result shows that STDTA, LTDTA, FCR & FAR
are significant variables because there value is lesser then 0.05. Which
are 0.000, 0.000, 0.000 & 0.000 respectively. While FDR, CDR & SALES
GROWTH is insignificant the value is 0.702, 0.551 & 0.240.R2in the
summary table displays value of 0.4724, which means that it’s a good
fit. Thus the value of R2 represents that 47.24 percent variation in the
profitability are carried by the explanatory variables explained in this
research paper.
Conclusion
Recommendation
References
Abu-Rub, N. (2012). Capital Structure and Firm Performance: Evidence
from Palestine Stock Exchange. Journal of Money, Investment
and Banking, 23, 109-117.
Akhtar, P., Husnain, M., &Mukhtar, M. A. (2012). The Determinants
of Capital Structure.
Amjed, S. (2007). The impact of financial structure on profitability:
study of Pakistan’s Textile Sector.
Chin, A. F. (1997). Relationship Between Capital Structure And
Profitability: A Time-Series Cross-Sectional Study On Malaysian
Firms (Doctoral dissertation, University Utara Malaysia)
Chou, S. R., & Lee, C. H. (2010). The Research on the Effects of capital
Structure on Firm Performance and Evidence from the Non-
financial Industry of Taiwan 50 and Taiwan Mid-cap 100 from
1987 to 2007. Journal of Statistics and Management Systems, 13(5),
1069-1078.
Chudson, Walter Alexander. (1945). “The Pattern of Corporate Financial
Structure: A Cross-Section View of Manufacturing, Mining, Trade,
and Construction, 1937.
De Mesquita, J. M. C., & Lara, J. E. (2003). Capital structure and
profitability: the Brazilian case
Ferati, R., &Ejupi, E. (2012). Capital Structure and Profitability: The
Macedonian Case. European Scientific Journal, 8(7)
Getzmann, A., Lang, S., &Spremann, K. (2010). Determinants of the
target capital structure and adjustment speed–evidence from Asian
capital markets. European Financial Management.
Gupta, P., Srivastava, A., & Sharma, D. (2012) Capital Structure and
Financial Performance: Evidence from India.
Hovey, M., Li, L., &Naughton, T. (2003). The relationship between
valuation and ownership of listed firms in China. Corporate
Governance: An International Review, 11(2), 112-122.
Khan, A. G. (2012). The relationship of capital structure decisions with
firm performance: A study of the engineering sector of Pakistan.
Abstract
1: Introduction
aggregate supply curve. This will create a rise in the general level of
prices. For the last two decades monetary economists also focused
on cost channel of MTM. There are large numbers of studies on the
cost channel of the Monetary Transmission which has been sited at
appropriate place.
The three cases have different implications for the monetary policy. If
the demand side effect of MTM is more effective, then using the
interest rate as a policy tool might be justified. However, if the cost
channel is more effective, then the interest based monetary policy
would worsen the situation rather than improving it. If the two types
of effects cancel each other, then the interest based monetary policy
would be ineffective to control inflation.
The idea of current study is; let the data decide whether the inflation
has increasing or decreasing affect on the price level. Since the theories
are conflicting, a model based on one theory ignoring rival theories is
not justified. Therefore we start with a general atheoretic model taking
into account the variables of all popular channels of interest-inflation
relationship. The atheoretic models such as ARDL often reduce to
model consistent with certain economic theory, by imposing the
restrictions not opposed by the data. The model formulated this way
will be automatically compatible with theory and data. Therefore we
estimate an atheoretic ARDL model and estimate the coefficients of
short run and long run parameter of relationship between interest rate
and prices.
2: literature review
2. The theories focusing on the supply side effect, which says that
rising interest rate, will increase the inflation. This is also called
the cost channel of monetary transmission mechanism.
Since long there are many evidences for the cost channels
of monetary transmission mechanism. Few of these studies are cited
below. Gibson (1923) found the positive correlation between interest
rates and prices in the UK data over a period of 200 years. This
finding was against the perception of economists therefore they
named it as a Gibson Paradox. Kitchin (1923) and Peake (1928) also
report evidence of a positive correlation between short term interest
rates and prices. However, the research during 1950 to 2000 did not
focus on the supply side effects of MTM and these model were not
assumed standard. According to Seelig (1974), the impact of interest
495 PAKISTAN BUSINESS REVIEW OCT2014
Interest Rate and Inflation . . . Research
rate changes on inflation was fairly negligible during the 1950s and
1960s.
Felipe (2009), Rehman & Malik (2010), Javid & Munir (2010)
and Jehan & Rashid (2011) show the positive effect of interest rate on
inflation in Pakistan economy.
Some other studies also support the clue that effect of interest
rate on inflation is insignificant. Rehman (2011) made a final model of
inflation using Hendry methodology, after comparing various existing
models for inflation in Pakistan. His final model does not contain
interest rate. This implies that according to Rehman (2011) interest
rate is not a significant determinant of inflation. Rizvi et al. (2012) also
found insignificant relation between interest Rate and inflation for
Pakistan economy. Ghaffari (2013) found insignificant relationship
between different combination of interest rate and inflation.
For Pakistan one can find the studies which are based on
the cost channel and the studies which are based on the demand
……………………………. (1)
Many other determinants of inflation are also cited in
literature. Especially with reference to Pakistan, Rehman (2011)
compares these models and finds Markup Pricing Model to be best
performing. According to Rehman (2011) this model “encompasses
and is not encompassed by” other models. This implies that other
models cannot improve over the predictive performance of Markup
Pricing Model4. This model involves following variables; unit labor
cost ( ), tax rate ( ) and fuel prices ( ).
……………………………….(2)
The Taylor Rule set the rate of interest on looking at the output and
inflation. Therefore the inflation actually observed is indirectly
dependent on these variables and model for inflation takes from
…………………………………………………. (3)
Therefore the most general model takes the following form
π = (i, CR,IP, ER, MS, SP, ULC, TAX, FP, y,y * )…… (4)
We are using wage as an indicator of unit labor cost and output gap
as the actual output and potential output therefore the model we
will be estimating will become:
4
Mark up pricing model made by Rehman (2011). He took all existing inflation
models for Pakistan economy and after applied Hendry ’s methodology; he
constructed a mark up model which is most suitable model of inflation for
Pakistan economy because the beauty of Hendry ’s methodology is that it has
the statistical properties of being empirically constant, parsimonious; data
consistent and the existing model automatically consistent with theory.
Consider the most general model described in Eq. (5). We are using
various measures of inflation and interest rate.
If the F- statistics is smaller than the lower bound, then the long run
relation does not exist.
∆t = α + β1 t−1 + β2 it−1 + β3 Xt−1 + α1 ∆it−1 + α2 ∆Xt + ∑kj=1 δj ∆t−j + γj ∆it−j + ρj ∆Xt−j +∈t …… (7)
•Regress on its own lags, lag value of and lag value of other
control variables
Xt = Xt−1 = Xt−2 , ….
SP ER TX IP EP CR W FP OG M2 i
CPIG ONR Coefficient 1.58 2.99 0.28 1.95 3.97 0.6 3.12 3.63 2.59 1.91 0.28
P-value 0.16 0.01** 0.95 0.08 0.00** 0.73 0.01** 0.00** 0.02* 0.08 0.95
DR Coefficient 1.59 2.55 0.25 2.22 2.46 0.38 3.24 3.54 3.12 1.77 1.09
P-value 0.16 0.02* 0.96 0.05 0.03* 0.89 0.01** 0.00** 0.01** 0.11 0.37
TB6 Coefficient 1.51 2.78 0.21 2.18 3.21 0.36 3.25 3.48 3.03 1.94 0.19
P-value 0.18 0.01** 0.97 0.05 0.01** 0.9 0.01** 0.00** 0.01** 0.08 0.98
CMR Coefficient 1.58 2.73 0.31 1.93 3.99 0.62 3 3.58 2.66 1.88 0.28
P-value 0.16 0.02* 0.93 0.08 0.00** 0.71 0.01** 0.00** 0.02* 0.09 0.95
CPIF ONR Coefficient 1.85 3.17 0.38 2.22 4.44 1.52 3.22 3.6 3.31 1.09 0.25
P-value 0.09 0.01** 0.89 0.05 0.00** 0.18 0.01** 0.00** 0.00** 0.37 0.96
DR Coefficient 2.01 2.54 0.27 2.66 3.06 0.59 3.28 3.43 3.55 1.15 1
P-value 0.07 0.02* 0.95 0.02* 0.01** 0.74 0.00** 0.00** 0.00** 0.34 0.43
TB6 Coefficient 1.57 2.64 0.52 2.48 4.48 1.32 3.75 3.72 3.48 1.4 0.69
P-value 0.16 0.02* 0.79 0.03* 0.00** 0.25 0.00** 0.00** 0.00** 0.22 0.66
CMR Coefficient 1.8 2.84 0.41 2.17 4.49 1.51 3.09 3.39 3.57 1.06 0.41
P-value 0.1 0.01** 0.87 0.05 0.00** 0.18 0.01** 0.00** 0.00** 0.39 0.87
CPINF ONR Coefficient 2.58 1.28 1.02 2.1 1.06 0.52 2.79 2.11 1.15 0.96 0.26
P-value 0.02* 0.27 0.41 0.06 0.39 0.79 0.01** 0.06 0.34 0.45 0.96
DR Coefficient 1.87 1.18 1 2.27 0.61 0.91 2.64 2.59 1.18 1.03 2.01
P-value 0.09 0.32 0.43 0.04* 0.72 0.49 0.02* 0.02* 0.32 0.41 0.07
TB6 Coefficient 2.52 1.95 1.76 2.25 0.86 1.07 3.05 2.65 1.41 0.81 2.82
P-Value 0.02* 0.08 0.11 0.04* 0.53 0.39 0.01** 0.02* 0.22 0.57 0.01**
CMR Coefficient 2.61 1.27 1.04 1.97 1.13 0.56 2.67 2.31 1.26 1.17 0.56
P-Value 0.02* 0.28 0.4 0.07 0.35 0.76 0.02* 0.04* 0.28 0.33 0.76
WPIG ONR Coefficient 2.73 0.71 0.62 1.76 2.56 0.18 2.98 3.23 6.78 1.64 0.12
P-Value 0.02* 0.64 0.71 0.11 0.02* 0.98 0.01** 0.01** 0.00** 0.14 0.99
DR Coefficient 3.21 1.07 0.97 2.98 2.14 0.66 3.26 3.47 7.83 1.44 2.02
P-Value 0.01** 0.38 0.45 0.01** 0.05 0.68 0.01** 0.00** 0.00** 0.2 0.07
TB6 Coefficient 3.06 0.88 0.76 2.25 2.09 0.52 3.59 3.16 7.77 1.48 0.82
P-Value 0.01** 0.51 0.6 0.04* 0.06 0.79 0.00** 0.01** 0.00** 0.19 0.56
CMR Coefficient 2.65 0.78 0.63 1.62 2.55 0.18 2.97 3.49 6.78 1.72 0.13
P-Value 0.02* 0.59 0.71 0.15 0.02** 0.98 0.01** 0.00** 0.00** 0.12 0.99
WPIF ONR Coefficient 1.39 2.38 0.67 1.29 4.45 1.46 4.62 2.33 2.56 1.21 0.34
P-Value 0.23 0.03* 0.67 0.27 0.00** 0.2 0.00** 0.04* 0.02* 0.31 0.92
DR Coefficient 1.51 2.59 0.53 1.71 3.64 0.65 5.59 2.42 3.46 1.55 2.37
P-value 0.18 0.02* 0.79 0.12 0.00** 0.69 0.00** 0.03* 0.00** 0.17 0.03*
TB6 Coefficient 1.41 1.85 0.92 1.49 4.84 1.61 5.15 2.36 3.05 1.45 0.64
P-value 0.22 0.09 0.48 0.19 0.00** 0.15 0.00** 0.03* 0.01** 0.2 0.7
CMR Coefficient 1.43 2.25 0.75 1.24 4.64 1.52 4.5 2.3 2.69 1.38 0.37
P-value 0.21 0.04* 0.61 0.29 0.00** 0.18 0.00** 0.04* 0.02* 0.23 0.89
WPINF ONR Coefficient 2.3 0.81 0.93 1.81 1.33 0.83 1.88 5.48 6.55 2.26 0.24
P-value 0.04* 0.56 0.47 0.1 0.25 0.55 0.09 0.00** 0.00** 0.04* 0.96
DR Coefficient 3.23 1.44 1.86 3.27 1.34 1.94 1.88 5.93 7.86 1.76 3.05
P-value 0.01** 0.2 0.09 0.01** 0.25 0.08 0.09 0.00** 0.00** 0.11 0.01**
TB6 Coefficient 2.94 1.12 1.67 2.44 1.4 1.77 2.52 5.6 7.65 1.79 1.63
P-value 0.01** 0.35 0.13 0.03* 0.22 0.11 0.02* 0.00** 0.00** 0.11 0.14
CMR Coefficient 2.27 0.9 0.96 1.75 1.26 0.87 1.88 5.66 6.62 2.37 0.4
P-value 0.04* 0.5 0.46 0.11 0.28 0.52 0.09 0.00** 0.00** 0.03* 0.88
*, Significant at 5% le ve l, **, significant at 1% le vel
The re sults are base d on m onthly data. The variable TX, CR and W are not available at monthly fre quency, s o their values we re e stim ate d interpolation (e xponential s moothing).
2. Spurious Regression.
Table 2a
Long Run Relationship between Interest Rates a nd
Inflation
ONR DR TBR6 CMR
CPIG 2 .5072 4.2805 2.0572 3.8117
CPIF 1 .4643 1.8711 1.1924 1.0715
CPINF 3 .5682 2.6201 4.9630 3.5748
WPIG 5.9668* 8.0459* 7.0730* 5.9907*
WPIF 24.403* 26 .013* 26.435* 27.916*
W PINF 6.2535* 10 .977* 7.4482* 5.8373*
Lower Bound: 4.9 4, Upper Bound:5.73
* , Null hypothesis (no long run relations) is rejected
Table 2b
Long Run Relationship between Interest Rates,
Inflation and Covariates
ONR DR TBR6 CMR
CPIG 5.3320* 4.8576* 5.2511* 5.6088*
CPIF 4.8580* 4.5244* 4.8261* 5.1423*
CPINF 4.4547* 3.9465* 4.3173* 4.5528*
WPIG 4.2634* 4.0498* 4.2411* 4.2753*
WPIF 3.8856* 2.7106 4.2411* 4.0818*
WPINF 3.7247* 3.6951* 3.6768* 3.7264*
Lower Bound: 2.32, Upper Bound:3.50
*, Null hypothesis (no long run relations) is
rejected.
4.1.4. Static Long Run Relation between Interest Rate and Inflation
Table no.4
Static Long Run Relation between Inflation and Interest Rate
Constant SP ER IP EP W FP OG M2 i
CPIG ONR Coefficient -102.36 0.01 0.59 0.06 -0.18 0.01 0.08 0.02 9.29 -0.05
P-value 0.03* 0.87 0.00** 0.05 0.00** 0.00** 0.04 0.84 0.01** 0.67
DR Coefficient -93.47 0.05 0.65 0.03 -0.14 0.01 0.07 0.03 7.98 0.38
P-value 0.05 0.25 0.00** 0.28 0.00** 0.00** 0.07 0.74 0.04* 0.11
TB6 Coefficient -118.51 0.03 0.58 0.03 -0.16 0.01 0.08 0.06 10.41 0.16
P-value 0.02 0.39 0.00** 0.28 0.00** 0.00** 0.04 0.54 0.01** 0.25
CMR Coefficient -110.16 0.01 0.59 0.06 -0.18 0.01 0.08 0.02 9.93 -0.08
P-value 0.02 0.88 0.00** 0.04 0.00** 0.00** 0.04 0.87 0.01** 0.56
CPIF ONR Coefficient 16.37 0.11 0.72 0.07 -0.34 0.02 0.07 0.00** -0.01 0
P-value 0.86 0.15 0.00** 0.18 0.00** 0.00** 0.34 0.99 1 0.99
DR Coefficient 26.73 0.2 0.83 0.01** -0.25 0.02 0.07 0.01** -2.12 0.91
P-value 0.77 0.02 0.00** 0.91 0.00** 0.00** 0.32 0.97 0.78 0.04
TB6 Coefficient -52.81 0.15 0.68 0.03 -0.3 0.02 0.08 0.08 5.29 0.38
P-value 0.57 0.03* 0.00** 0.66 0.00** 0.00** 0.24 0.63 0.48 0.15
CMR Coefficient 9.4 0.11 0.7 0.07 -0.34 0.02 0.07 -0.02 0.55 -0.03
P-value 0.92 0.14 0.00** 0.19 0.00** 0.00** 0.33 0.91 0.94 0.9
CPINF ONR Coefficient -150.62 -0.08 0.46 0.04 -0.08 0.01 0.11 -0.07 12.8 -0.07
P-value 0.01** 0.09 0.00** 0.26 0.06 0.00** 0.02* 0.58 0.00** 0.64
DR Coefficient -143.33 -0.06 0.48 0.02 -0.05 0.01 0.11 -0.07 11.9 0.18
P-value 0.01** 0.21 0.00** 0.65 0.28 0.00** 0.04* 0.58 0.01** 0.5
TB6 Coefficient -113.76 -0.08 0.48 0.04 -0.09 0.02 0.1 -0.11 9.79 -0.05
P-Value 0.09 0.12 0.00** 0.33 0.08 0.00** 0.04* 0.46 0.07 0.8
CMR Coefficient -160.48 -0.08 0.47 0.05 -0.09 0.01 0.11 -0.05 13.68 -0.1
P-Value 0.00** 0.1 0.00** 0.21 0.04* 0.00** 0.02* 0.69 0.00** 0.49
WPIG ONR Coefficient -189.01 -0.01 0.3 0.01 -0.17 0.02 0.14 0.03 15.81 0.09
P-Value 0.01** 0.9 0.04 0.9 0.00** 0.00** 0.02* 0.85 0.00** 0.63
DR Coefficient -119.07 0.07 0.44 -0.04 -0.16 0.02 0.17 -0.18 9.26 0.72
P-Value 0.21 0.33 0.02* 0.52 0.03* 0.00** 0.05 0.47 0.24 0.14
TB6 Coefficient -150.59 0.01 0.21 -0.05 -0.14 0.02 0.16 -0.1 12.42 0.3
P-Value 0.1 0.82 0.28 0.48 0.04* 0.00** 0.03* 0.67 0.1 0.25
CMR Coefficient -194.92 -0.01 0.3 0.01 -0.18 0.02 0.14 0.05 16.35 0.06
P-Value 0 0.91 0.04 0.83 0.00** 0.00** 0.02* 0.74 0.00** 0.77
WPIF ONR Coefficient -83.97 0.05 0.44 0.07 -0.35 0.02 0.04 0.01 8.01 0.00**
P-Value 0.31 0.39 0.01** 0.13 0.00** 0.00** 0.49 0.94 0.23 1
DR Coefficient -48.33 0.15 0.56 0.02 -0.3 0.02 0.02 -0.05 4.18 0.71
P-value 0.56 0.04* 0.00** 0.7 0.00** 0.00** 0.7 0.78 0.54 0.07
TB6 Coefficient -109.19 0.09 0.42 0.04 -0.32 0.02 0.04 0.05 9.77 0.29
P-value 0.21 0.12 0.02* 0.48 0.00** 0.00** 0.53 0.78 0.17 0.24
CMR Coefficient -86.18 0.05 0.43 0.08 -0.36 0.02 0.04 0 8.2 -0.03
P-value 0.31 0.38 0.02 0.14 0.00** 0.00** 0.51 1 0.24 0.89
WPINF ONR Coefficient -280.15 -0.02 0.25 -0.04 -0.08 0.01 0.22 0.1 22.73 0.17
P-value 0.00** 0.78 0.17 0.44 0.24 0.00** 0.01** 0.57 0.00** 0.45
DR Coefficient -222.78 0.02 0.36 -0.09 -0.09 0.02 0.28 -0.16 17.42 0.61
Conclusion
There are various conflicting opinions on how the interest rate affects
the inflation. The popular opinion is that interest rate has negative
impact on inflation, however many economists have quite opposite
opinion and the empirical evidences found in literature are mixed.
Some evidence suggests net effect of interest rate on prices to be
insignificant.
Recommendation
References
Barth III, M. J., & Ramey, V. A. (2001). The Cost Channel of Monetary
Transmission. (B. S. Bernanke, & K. Rogoff, Eds.) NBER
Macroeconomics Annual 2001 , 16, 199-239.
Bernanke, B. S., & Gertler, M. (1995). Inside the Black Box: The Credit
Channel of Monetary Policy. Journal of Economic Perspective , 9
(4), 27-48.
Javid, M., & Munir, K. (2010). The price puzzle and monetary policy
transmission mechanism in Pakistan: Structural vector
autoregressive approach. The Pakistan Development Review ,
449–460.
Ravenna, F., & Walsh, C. E. (2006), Optimal monetary policy with the
cost channel. Journal of Monetary Economics 53, 199–216.
Rizvi, S. K., Naqvi, B., & Rizavi, S. S. (2012). What Does Pakistan
Have to Join the Inflation Targeters’ Club—a Royal Flush or a
Seven-Deuce Offsuit? The Lahore Journal of Economics , 17 (2),
35-62.
KEY TO SUSTAINABILITY:
EMBRACING CHANGE
Murtaza Abbas1
Abstract
Introduction
Research Objective
6- Auster, Ellen R.; Wylie, Krista K., Valente, Michael S. (2005) Strategic
organizational change. New York: Palgrave Macmillan
7- Auster, Ellen R.; Wylie, Krista K., Valente, Michael S. (2005) Strategic
organizational change. New York: Palgrave Macmillan
8- Van de Ven, Andrew H.; Sun, Kangyong (2011) Breakdowns in
Implementing Models of Organization Change. Academy of Management
Perspectives, August, Vol. 25 Issue 3, p58-74
9- Paton Robert A.; Paton, Rob; McCalman, James (2008) Change Management:
A Guide to Effective Implementation. London: SAGE Pu blications Ltd
between and forge ahead and embrace latest technologies and trends
to compete with their contemporaries.
Since people are the input to almost all outputs, therefore, there
importance is paramount and critical to success of all strategies.
Howsoever, efficient the strategies, people who execute those
strategies actually hold the key to its success. It is for the same reason
that for any change to be recognized accepted and implemented in the
organization; need to be cognizant of the people issues that it may
entail.
1.Importance of communication
2.Managing Fear
12- Gustin, Joseph F. (2007) Safety Management: A Guide for Facility Managers.
New York: The Fairmont Press, Inc.
3.Retention of Employees
5.Conflict Management
Conflicts which are considered inevitable among people are
part of organizational environment. Because of rapidly changing
business environment conflict management has now become a
fascinating topic for managers. We have discussed in this chapter
earlier that when change is introduced in an organization, it invites
resistance from people. Managing conflicting personalities is the most
important task of managers who are involved in the change processes.
In organizations, conflict is a natural phenomenon which
develops whenever some individuals and groups work together for
the achievement of a particular goal. It happens when people have
Conclusion
Ask yourself these clinical questions before embarking on
implementing an organizational change across your place of work:
What are our objectives for implementing this change, why are we
going ahead with this, and how and when will we know that what we
wanted to achieve has been accomplished successfully? Who this
change will directly affect, and what will be their reaction to it? What
portion of this change can be accomplished by our own individual
efforts, and at what stages and parts we might need help from others?
All these questions and aspects strongly relate to both personal and
organizational change.
-Transformation Needs Involvement – It may not be Imposed
Change cannot be imposed; it’s as simple as that. People need
to be empowered to make their own effort and find out solutions out
of their own consciousness and that is of course with the help of
managers as they support them and facilitate them with anything
they need as well as back up from the leadership and executives that
would give them courage to carry out the task and make the process
ever more easier.
-Make it Stick
Don’t let it slip when you’re almost there. Hire new recruits,
show them how it’s done, encourage new change torch bearers. Make
that change that you’ve brought about a constant feature of your
culture.
References
Auster, Ellen R.; Wylie, Krista K., Valente, Michael S. (2005) Strategic
organizational change. New York
Cengage Learning Franken, Arnoud; Edwards, Chris; Lambert, Rob.
(2009) Executing Strategic Change: Understanding the Critical
Management Elements that Lead to Success. California
Management Review, Spring, Vol. 51 Issue 3, p49-73Gustin, Joseph
F. (2007) Safety Management: A Guide for Facility Managers.
New York
Cengage Learning Oreg, Shaul (2003) Resistance to change:
Developing an individual differences measure.
Claudine; Hisrich, Robert D.; Roche, Frank W. (2010) Change
Management through Entrepreneurship in Public Sector
Enterprises. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship,
Dec2010, Vol. 15 Issue 4, p415-437
Earthscan Van de Ven, Andrew H.; Sun, Kangyong (2011) Breakdowns
in Implementing Models of Organization Change. Academy of
Management Perspectives, August, Vol. 25 Issue 3, p58-74
John Wiley & Sons Jeffers, Jennifer (2010) Climate Change and the
Arctic: Adapting to Changes in Fisheries Stocks and Governance
Regimes. Ecology Law Quarterly, 2010, Vol. 37 Issue 3, p917-977,
61pJournal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 88, No. 4. (August), pp.
680-693.Kearney
Kondalkar, V.G. (2010) Organization Effectiveness and Change
Management, New Delhi, PHI Learning Kreitner
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Lussier, Robert N. (2011) Management
Fundamentals: Concepts, Applications, Skill Development.
Stamford, Connecticut
Oreg, Shaul (2006) Personality, context, and resistance to
organizational change. European Journal of Work &
Organizational Psychology, Vol. 15, No. 1. (March), pp. 73-101
Paton Robert A.; Paton, Rob; McCalman, James (2008) Change
Management: A Guide to Effective Implementation. London:
SAGE Publications Ltd
Annexure A
SUMMARY OF MAJOR RESPONSES OF SURVEY CONDUCTED
INTERNAL REASONS
11. How did the management deal with the resistance from
employees in the implementation of change?
ANSWERS
I have
QUESTİONS Yes no idea No
EFFECT OF ORGANIZATIONAL
ETHICS ON JOB SATISFACTION
OF NON-LIFE INSURANCE
EMPLOYEES IN PAKISTAN
Mehrukh Salman1 & Ali Taimur Baig2
Abstract
1.Introduction
judgment one makes about one’s job or job situation”. More recently,
Daneshfard, Rahimi, & Damirchi, (2011) described job satisfaction as
“how content an individual is with his or her job”. Haroon, Zaman, &
Rehman, (2012)defined Job satisfaction as “an enjoyable emotional
state resulting from the judgment of one’s job; a sentimental response
to one’s job; and an approach towards one’s job”.
Pay Satisfaction:
Pay satisfaction is defined as “the amount of overall positive affect
(or feelings) individuals have toward pay” (Miceli and Lane, 1991).
Pay plays a vital role in determining composite job satisfaction
(Oshagbemi and Hickson, 2002). It indicates that an employee’s
satisfaction can be derived from the pay that he receives. It clearly
indicates that pay satisfaction weighs the greatest when determining
one’s job’s satisfaction.
Promotion Satisfaction:
Moving up in the ranks to a designation, which is recognized by
having higher status, greater respect or even greater pay Jackson and
Schuler, (2000).According to Judge and Klinger, (2008), Pay and
promotion are considered extrinsic factors
Supervision Satisfaction:
Employees desire to work under supervisors who are competent,
selfless and honest. (Henne and Locke, 1985). Supervision, Co-worker
and Work satisfaction are considered as intrinsic factors (Judge and
Klinger, 2008).
Co-Workers Satisfaction:
Employees associate themselves with other employees who share
similar set of values and facilitate in getting the job done. (Henne and
Locke, 1985).
Work Satisfaction
According to Adam, (1965), right balance should be achieved between
the work performed by employee and the reimbursement he receives
for getting the job done; inability to do so will result in job
dissatisfaction. Employees prefer working in environment that is
conducive to job satisfaction. Furthermore, employees want to work
in organizations that admire and respect them for their values.
1.6 Theories:
2.Literature Review
might be due to the fact that employees under stress tend to work
harder resulting in job satisfaction. Moreover, the correlation between
job satisfaction and role of hierarchy was moderate and positive.
H1:Top management support for ethical behavior has significant effect on job satisfaction
Managers from Singapore were more satisfied with their job if they
perceive a linkage between ethical behavior and career success (Koh
and Boo, 2001). Similarly in India, employees were of the view that
they will be satisfied with their job if their career prospects were high
due to ethical behavior. This result was parallel with cognitive
dissonance theory (Viswesvaran and Deshpande, 1996). Thus, a null
hypothesis was postulated:
3.Methodology
Job Satisfaction:
b) Benevolent
c) Principled.
Survey Design:
The questionnaires were administered to the employees of non-life
insurance companies having designation of manager which included
assistant, deputy, chief and senior positions. In some companies,
managerial designations are replaced with that of a president. So that
was taken into account as well. For Karachi, Peshawar, Faisalabad and
Multan the questionnaires were sent via post. On the other hand,
questionnaires for Lahore were self-administered.
SPSS and AMOS were used for this study. From SPSS, descriptive
statistics were used to calculate percentage, mean, standard deviation
and frequency distribution of the respondents.
Harman’s one factor test was also done via SPSS.
4.Analysis:
T-Test for Gender and marital status confirmed that there was no
difference in the opinion regardless of gender and marital status when
it comes to Pay Satisfaction, Supervision Satisfaction, Co-worker
Satisfaction, Work Satisfaction and Job satisfaction holistically.
Moreover, the opinion also didn’t differ with gender and marital status
when it came to ethical, benevolent and principled climates. They also
didn’t posit any variation in opinion between ethical behavior and
career success.
4.2ANOVA:
The results indicated that there was no difference in opinion for pay
satisfaction, promotion satisfaction, co-worker satisfaction, supervisor
satisfaction, work satisfaction, overall job satisfaction, egoistic climate,
benevolent climate, principled climate and association between ethical
behavior and career success when it comes to employee of different
age brackets, education level, departments, experience and salary.
558 PAKISTAN BUSINESS REVIEW OCT2014
Effect of Organizational Ethics . . . Research
Table III
Convergent and Discriminant Validity
Validity:
Table IV
Hypothesis Test
According to(Segars and Grover, 1998), values of CFI ,TLI and IFI
should be greater than 0.80. The final model showed a respectablegood
fit for the entire model fit indices as shown in Table V.
The CFI explains the average correaltion among variables Higher the
value, better it is. The CFI of 0.850 depcits a high correatlion among
the varaibles. RMSEA is anindicator of model fit. Usually, values
greater than 0.10 depicts poor fit. For this research the value of RMSEA
came out to be 0.082 which indicates a good fit
Table V
Model Fit
Result (Default model) Values
Chi-square 217.448
Probability level .000
CMIN/df 1.977
CFI 0.850
TLI 0 .815
IFI 0.856
RMSEA 0.082
5.Discussion
Figure 2 .
Final Structural Model
Apart from work, pay, supervision and coworkers, the fifth dimension
called Promotion Satisfaction was not a significant dimension of job
satisfaction vis-à-vis ethical climate of insurance companies. This is
so because they don’t expect themselves to be promoted on the
grounds that they have acted within the parameters of ethical climate
of their organization.
Employees in one of the city were least satisfied with their jobs as
compared to employees in other cities. This could probably be because
of the prevalence of strict and rigid rules in order to restrain and
avoid any uncalled for behavior in the organization. On the condition
of anonymity, a top manager of an insurance company from Lahore
revealed that employees in that particular city engage in immoral and
unethical activities like accepting false claims in order to ante up a lot
of money for their personal use. As this happens without the
knowledge of their managers, the administration and the respective
head offices are left with no other option but to enforce rigorous
disciplinary policies and punitive actions against the deviants. The
reason behind breaking the rules and going for corrupt practices is
their meager salary and non-benevolent climate in the organization.
6.Conclusion:
This study examines the link between organizational ethics and job
satisfaction as perceived by managers of non-life insurance sector.
To be more specific, link between job satisfaction and association
between ethical behavior and career success, top management’s
support for ethical behavior and ethical climates were ascertained.
Managers from 14 different companies from Karachi, Lahore,
Peshawar, Multan and Faisalabad were administered questionnaires.
The response rate was 89.6%. Employees from Multan appeared to
be less satisfied with their job. The results overall depicted that top
management’s support for ethical behavior has no link with job
satisfaction which is consistent with findings of Visweswaran et al.,
(1998). Moreover, ethical climate also has no direct link with job
satisfaction. However; it is indirectly linked towards Job satisfaction
via ethical behavior and career success association.
References
THE INFLUENCE OF
ORGANIZATIONAL FACTORS ON
EMPLOYEES’ COMMITMENT
LEVELS: A STUDY OF THE BANKING
SECTOR OF PAKISTAN
Feryal Khan1 & Sohail Zafar2
Abstract
1.Introduction
2. Literature Review
2.1Organizational Commitment
2.2Organizational Factors:
Figure 1:
Theoretical framework of the study
Organizational Organizational Socio-Demographic
Culture Commitment factors
Training Affective Age
commitment Gender
Rewards
Continuance
Teamwork Marital Status
commitment
Normative
Communication commitment Tenure
3.Research Methodology
3.1Sample:
7=Strongly Agree the other end. Reverse coding was applied for
items with negative statements. The questionnaire consisted of three
main sections. The first section includes statements to measure
Organizational commitment and its forms. The second section
addresses questions related to organizational dimensions. Lastly,
the third section requests the respondents to provide demographic
details.
based study (Nunnaly, J. C., 1978). Thus it can be stated that the
reliability of the survey items are acceptable.
Table1:
Descriptive Statistics of Banking Employees Perceptions of
Organizational Commitment forms and Organizational Factors
4. Results:
The SPSS statistical software Version 15 was utilized to carry
out the calculations and statistical analyses. Firstly, correlations had
been calculated to show the link between the dependant variable i.e
organizational commitment and its subscales with organizational and
demographic factors. The results , presented in table 2, indicate that
organizational factors have a meaningful conceptual relationship with
organizational commitment and its forms.VIF (variance inflation factor)
was computed to check the multicolinearity amongst the set of
independent variables. The largest VIF value was 3.25, which is
significantly lower than the cut-off value of 10 (Chatterjee, Hadi &
Price, 2000). Thus it can be stated that multi-co linearity did not seem
to be a problem for this study.
Table 3:
Results of stepwise regression analysis
Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4
Variables Overall Org Commitment Affective commitment Continuance commitment Normative Commitment
Co-efficient T-stat Co-efficient T-stat Co-efficient T -stat Co-efficient T-stat
Rewards 0.288 3.957** .291 3.389**
Teamwork 0.290 3.971** .219 3.153** .274 3.547**
Communication .212 2.46*8
Training .228 2.955**
Gender
Marital status
Age
Work experience 0.134 2.225* .153* 2.446
F-value 27.653 20.63 9.94 24.21
p-value 0.00 .000 .002 .000
R2 0.297 .240 .048 .197
Adjusted R2 0.287 .228 .043 .189
N 200 200 200 200
5.Conclusions
References
Ahmad, K.Z & AbuBakar, R. (2003).The Association between Training
and Organizational Commitment among White-Collar
Workers in Malaysia. International Journal of Training and
Development. 7, 166-185.
Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1990).The measurement and antecedents
of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the
organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology.63,1-18.
Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1996). Affective, continuance, and
normative commitment to the organization: An examination
of construct validity. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 49,
252–276.
Bratton, J., Gold, J.(1994). Human Resource Management: Theory
and Practice. Macmillan, Basingstoke.
Bulut, C & Culha, O. (2010). The effects of organizational training
on organizational commitment. International Journal of
Training & Development; 14 (4), 309-322.
Buchanan, B. (1974).Building organizational commitment: the
socialization of managers in work organizations’,
Administrative Science Quarterly. 19, 4, 533–46.
Burton, D. (1991),Tellers into sellers. International Journal of Bank
Marketing. 9 (6), 25-29.
Bushra, F., Usman, A., & Naveed, A. (2011). Effect of Transformational
Leadership on Employees’ Job Satisfaction and
Organizational Commitment in Banking Sector of Lahore
(Pakistan). International Journal of Business & Social
Science.
Chughtai, A.A & Zafar, S.(2006), Antecedents and consequences of
Organizational Commitment Among Pakistani University
Teachers, Applied H.R.M Research.11 (1), 39-64.
Chatterjee, S., Hadi, A. S., & Price, B. (2000). Regression Analysis by
Example. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc
Delarue, A. Hootegem, G.V., Procter, S. & Burridge, M. (2008). Team
working and organizational performance: A review of survey-
based research. International Journal of Management
Reviews. 10 ( 2), 127–148
Abstract
Introduction
Literature Review
Methodology
Design:
Mixed method was used in this research, quantitative as well
as qualitative method, while investigating into the various qualitative
Sample:
For quantitative analysis the sample size for the study was
the four OB classes from Fall 2012, it was random sampling every fifth
student was picked, the sample size consisted of 80 students from
both BBA and BS Joint program. Among the sample, 61.4%
respondents age were from 18 to 20 years, 32.8% were from 21to 22
years of age and 5.7% were 22 to 24 years of age. Male students
sample size was 52.8% and 47.1% were females. There were35.7%
students from the third semester, 5.7% from the fourth semester, 37.1%
from the fifth semester, 7.1% from sixth semester, 11.4% from the
seventh semester and 2.9 % were from eighth semester.75.7%
respondents were from BBA and 24.3% were from BS-J.
Instrument:
To measure ‘Intrinsic Motivation” of students, Motivated
Strategies for Learning Questionnaire or MSLQ (Pintrich & DeGroot,
1990; Pintrich et al., 1993) was used and the Learner Empowerment
Scale (LES: Frymier et al., 1996; Weber, Martin, & Cayanus, 2005) was
used to measure the variables that empower students to learn
(Appendix-2a).
To investigate student’s perception about the OB course, semi
– structured interview were conducted. (Appendix-2)
Results
Qualitative Analysis
They all believed that it is the teacher’s enthusiasm, the course design
that includes activities, novelty, curiosity are some of the factors that
drives them to the class and the rest of the respondents joined and
agreed to it. One student added as:
Respondent 2. ‘I never had liking for the course but the teacher’s
enthusiasm , concepts, examples and activities are so interesting
that eventually I have developed an interest about the course and
can’t think of absences.’
Further participants added that the concepts you learn and the
practicality is more important rather than grade, one of the participants
quoted his experience by saying:
Respondent 5.”In the course I enjoy the readings, they are more
interesting and helped me to see the concepts connection to the real
world, I love cases, the extra readings were especially helpful for me
to understand current issues, I love those classes were we can speak
and get our issues and voices heard, rather than asked to be quiet
as we are running out of time, my motivation gets down and I start
hating those classes.”
Respondent 6.”I love those classes which has the element of curiosity
in them, which the teacher builds, making the student more interested
(i)Behavioural skill: The first theme that was very obvious among
the participants was that OB is a course that develops “people skills”.
Respondent 3. “Let me tell you, you can even judge people by their
behaviour and then deal with them accordingly.”‘I have my passion
to know and understand human variable it is so interesting and
challenging which I have explored in OB, I can’t think at present of
anything.’
Quantitative Analysis
Table 1
Demographic Information of the Participants
Gender Specialization s
Male 37 52.8% Accounting & 2 2.8%
Female 33 47.1% Finan ce 4 5.7%
Semester Economics & 4 5.7%
rd
3 Semester 25 35.7% Finan ce 11 15.7%
4th Semester 4 5.7% Economics 25 35.7%
5th Semester 26 37.1% Finan ce
6th Semester 5 7.1% Human Resource 4 5.7%
th
7 Semester 8 11.4% Management 19 27.1%
8th Semester 2 2.9% Management 1 1.4%
Marketin g
Supply Chain
Table 2
Analysis of Variance for Linear Regression with Intrinsic Motivation
as Predictor of Learning
Model SS df MS F Sig.
Regression 68.792 1 68.792 27.132 .000a
Residual 172.408 68 2.535
Total 241.200 69
a. Predictors (Constant), Intrinsic Motivation
b. Dependent Variable: Perceived Usefu lness
Table 3
Coefficients for Linear Regression with Intrinsic Motivation as
Predictor of Learning
B SE B
Table 4
A Correlation between Intrinsic Motivation and Perceived
Usefulness
Intrinsic Motivation
Table 5
A Correlation between Intrinsic Motivation and Satisfaction with
the Course
Intrinsic
Motivation
Satisfaction With the Pearson Correlation .688**
Course
Sig. (2-tailed) .000
N 70
Figure 1
Discussion
The limitation in this study was that, the data and interview
was collected and taken from single business school and from those
OB sections that the researcher teaches, there could have been a
more detailed study by also analyzing the different demographic
variable provided and their relation to the topic researched. Since
only those sections were tested whom the researcher taught, there
might be a possibility of biasness in answering done by the
participants. Going forward, the researcher even tested the relation
Conclusion
In summary, the research was to explore the variables that
cause intrinsic motivation and its effect on learning and to analyze
students’ perception about Organizational Behaviour course. The
findings of the study supports this view that an intrinsically motivated
student has a positive effect on their learning and variables like
supportive feedback, interaction, course design, practical oriented
exercise, knowledge thirst, curiosity, teacher’s enthusiasm, practicality
of concepts and interest are associated with intrinsic motivation and
has a positive impact on learning. The results further supported that
intrinsically motivated students perception and satisfactions about
OB course is positive which was also proven statistically.
References
Alsop, R. (2004, September 22). And the winners are . . . WSJ guide to
business schools: Recruiters’ top picks. Wall Street Journal,
R1-R10.
Bain, K. (2004). What the best college teachers do. Cambridge, MA:
Harvard University press.
Edwards, C. H., & Edwards, L. (1999). Let’s end the grading game. The
Clearing House, 72, 260-263.
Love, E. G., Love, D. W., & Northcraft, G. B. (2010). Is the end in sight?
Student regulation of in-class and extra-credit effort in
response to performance feedback. Academy of Management
Learning & Education, 9, 81-97.
Merritt,J. (2004, October 18). The best B-schools. Business Week, 63-
94.
Pittman, T. S., Emery, J., & Boggiano, A. K. (1982). Intrinsic and extrinsic
motivational orientations: Reward-induced change in
preference for complexity. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 42, 789-797.
Ryan, R.M., & Deci, E.L. (2000). When rewards compete with
nature: The understanding of intrinsic motivation and
selfreulation.pp14-54.
Van Seters,D., & Field, R.H.G. (1989). The MBA program: Viewsfrom a
student and a professor. Organizational Behavior Teaching
Review,13 (3),59-71.
Vansteenkiste, M., Simons, J., Lens, W., Sheldon, K. M., & Deci, E. L.
(2004). Motivating learning, performance, and persistence:
The synergistic effects of intrinsic goal contents and
autonomy-supportive contexts. Journal of Personality and
Social Psychology, 87, 246-260.
Abstract
This research analyzes the performance of IPO’s on first
trading day and in long run for firms listed on Karachi stock
exchange during period 2000-2011. First trading day IPO
performance is measured with market adjusted abnormal return.
Sample for first trading day IPO performance consists of 69 IPOs.
Results show that on first trading day market awards investors with
mean abnormal return of 53.82%. First trading day returns are
analyzed on sectoral and yearly basis as well. Results show that
performance of IPOs in some sectors was better than others and
similarly in some years IPOs performance was better than others.
Introduction
When a new security comes into the market, a question is raised that
how much to pay for that security. To answer this question investors
use different approaches while all lie on the expected future benefits
Literature Review
Sahoo and Rajib (2010) studied the IPO undervaluation on the first
day trading and their poor performance after that as compared to
market benchmark. Focal point of the study is the valuation of price
performance of IPO up to 36 month including first day. The study
conducted on a sample of 92 IPO’s of India and found that they did
not perform well in long and short run. The article shows that on
average Indian IPO do not perform well on the first day compared to
market index. The result shows that IPO underperformance is more
seen in first year trading i.e. up to 12 months. On the other hand long
run performance is measured with wealth relative and BHAR.
Calculation of wealth relative for 12 month,24month, and 36month
from the first day of trading. Wealth relative greater than 1 shows
better IPO performance than market and vice versa. The BHAR results
showed that in 1st year the IPOs did not perform but for 24 and 36month
they outperform as value of BAHR for this period is positive.
Regression analysis is used to check factors influencing
underperformance. Results showed that first day return, offer size,
leverage at IPO date, timing of issue were extensively influencing
underperformance. Some factors have no impact on underperformance
like age of the IPO firm, rate of subscription, promoter group’s retention,
and price-to-book value.
Rizwan and khan (2007) studied the long run performance of private
versus public sector IPOs of Pakistan. The study aimed to examine
that to what extent private sector IPOs and public sector IPOs are
different in context of under pricing in Pakistan, why under pricing is
done and how to compare long run performance of public and private
IPO. Sample taken was of 35 IPOs from Karachi stock exchange where
7 were private sector IPOs and rests were public IPOs held in period
2001-2006. Buy and hold returns were calculated to analyze the short
term stock performance. To analyze the performance market adjusted
returns which were the difference between initial return and respective
market return were also calculated. Study found that initial abnormal
returns have positive relationship with corporation size indicating
that government sold big corporations at cheaper rates. In long run
Sohail and Nasar (2007) studied the IPOs of Pakistan. The purpose of
the study was to find out the initial public offerings performance in
Pakistan. They have taken sample on 50 IPO companies listed in
Karachi stock exchange from year 2000 to year 2006. In year 2000 to
year 2006 total 55 IPO’s took place. Different methodologies (market
adjusted abnormal return, Buy and hold returns, cumulative abnormal
return etc) were used in order to measure the performance of initial
public offering in Pakistan. According to this article an average under-
pricing in KSE index during year 2000 to year 2006 is 35.66% and buy-
and-hold abnormal return and cumulative abnormal return shows
negative results for first year of its listing period. Furthermore 15 out
of 50 IPO’s (30%) provide negative initial abnormal return, While 35
out of 50 IPO’s (70%) provide positive access abnormal return. For
entire sample market adjusted abnormal return (MAAR) is 35.66.The
variables used are P/E, market capitalization, M.V gross proceeds,
size etc. According to this article, investments in IPO companies have
negative return over a period of one year after listing.
Procianoy and cigerza (2007) studied the short run and long run
performance among India, china, and Brazil. The purpose of this study
was to compare the performance of IPOs issued during 2001-2006 by
the Brazil, India, and china companies. The short run and long run
performance is checked by different methodology, short run
performance is calculated through initial return, e.g. difference between
first day closing price and offer price. For long run performance is
measured using BHAR and average monthly market-adjusted return.
Linear regression is used to clarify the IPOs performance. dependent
variable is taken from short time period performance(return) and from
long-run performance (BHAR).independent variable used from
previous studies, like interest rate, inflation, country risk, FDI, GDP
growth etc .193 IPOs is included in the sample 29 from brazil 91 from
India and 70 IPOs from china. Data is taken from Bombay stock
exchange, BOVESPA stock exchange, and Hong Kong stock exchange.
Due lack of data of Chinese offer calculation of initial return are not
possible in case of china the initial return of brazil and India are
7.10% and 30.68%.buy-and –hold –market adjusted return for brazil
10.94% and negative for india-7.06%. The result shows us that IPOs
of china and Brazil are over perform MMAR result for Brazil, India,
and china were 1.06%,-0.66%, and 3.65%.
Alvarez and Gonzalez (2001) studied the long run Spanish IPO
performance from 1987-1997 holding a sample of 56 companies. Data
is gathered from Madrid stock exchange and Spanish security
commission. Stocks return of initial moments of investors, first trading
day and in long run for 12, 36 and 60 months after initial day are
calculated. Different (Buy and hold returns, fama & fench three factor
model) methodologies and benchmarks were used to determining the
strength of IPOs performance. Buy and hold return and fama & fench
have given different results. The study found that unusual returns
for first year are positive while for 3rd and 5th year they are negative.
Aggarwal et. al. (2001) studied about tactic behind the under-pricing
of initial public offering and selling of share at the time of its expiration
of lockup duration. They took sample of 621 non-internet IPOs and
internet related IPOs during period year 1993 to year 1999. The purpose
of this paper is to check manager tactics to under-price the IPO, its
information which flow in the market and selling the share at the end
of lockup duration. According to this paper manager intentionally
under-priced IPO at first day trading to increase their wealth by selling
a part of their share at lockup period’s end, in fact this under-pricing
create positive information in the market and ultimately the demand
curve shifts upward for these stock which allow the manage selling of
their shares at higher price on the expiration of lock up duration
(usually 90 to 180 days after IPO).They used regression model to
gauge the impact of different variables on under pricing which show
Firth (1997) studied the Long run stock performance of New Zealand’s
IPOs where huge number of companies were listed during 1977-1997.
In New Zealand most important factor for valuation of companies is
their expected earning mentioned in their prospectus. They took sample
of 143 IPOs covering period 1979-1987. Company relevant data was
taken from its prospectus while stock data was taken from stock
exchange and local database. For analysis they considered the
abnormal stock returns which were the difference between company’s
stock returns and equivalent companies stock returns of the same
period. Those equivalent companies were from the same industry and
are close in terms of market capitalization. Returns were the average of
monthly returns. They found wealth relative where wealth relative of
more than one indicate the outperformance and below than one shows
underperformance. 1st day abnormal return was 25.87%. Regression
analysis revealed that gross proceeds of IPO and retention of ownership
of pre-issue owners have no relation with IPO performance. Study
shows that cumulative average returns of 1st and 3rd month was
positive while that of 2nd, 12th,24th,36th,48th and 60th were negative.
In our study we focus on the methodology point of view i.e. the way
long run performance is measured. We applied CAR method. Fama
(1998) also preferred this model instead of BHAR model. In literature
long run performance is measured on monthly basis but in our study
we measured long run performance on weekly, fortnightly basis in
addition to monthly basis.
Research Methodology
In this study we have used market returns and stock return as variables
where KSE 100 Index is used as a proxy for market and any increase or
decrease in this index is taken as market return. This return is calculated
as
Rm=( It2 – It1 )/ It1
Where, Rm = market return during period t1 to t2, It1= KSE 100 index
at period t1 and It2= KSE 100 index at period t2.
For analyzing first day trading we have used market adjusted abnormal
return. This measures the first day abnormal return of IPO. It is
calculated as the difference between first day stock return and
respective market return.
Abnormal returns
Abnormal return is defined as the performance of IPO that varies from
market return. Abnormal returns are calculated as the difference
between stock returns and market returns. Abnormal returns are
normally calculated as the difference between the security return and
its expected return. Here it is assumed that market return is the expected
return for the securities. If stock performance is more than the respective
period’s market return then its abnormal return will be positive while
if its performance is weaker than respective period market return then
abnormal return will be negative. We calculated abnormal returns on
first trading day, weekly, fortnightly, and monthly basis for each IPO.
For calculating weekly returns we took every fifth observation, for
fortnight every tenth and for month every 22th observation of the
trading days for three years.
ARt = Rs,t - Rm,t
Where, Rs,t = stock return at time t, Rm,t = market return at time t
This section describes the results of our study and their interpretation.
Results are categories according to model used to measure the
performance. Performance of IPOs on first trading day is analyzed
through MAAR. First trading day IPO performance is viewed in context
of sectors and years. Long run performance of IPOs is measure through
cumulative abnormal returns.
Table 1-A
Initial Day Abnormal Return
N Mean Std. Deviation T stat Sig. (2-T ailed)
69 0.538207 1.7 11811 2.61167 0.011078
Sector Wise Initial Abnormal Returns
N Mean Std. Deviation T stat Sig. (2-T ailed)
20 53.82% 52.24% 4.40 0.00031
Table 1-B.
Initial Day Abnormal Return for 57-IPOs
N Mean Std. Deviation T stat Sig. (2-Tailed)
57 0.6446 1.8165231 2.723173 0.002310
Sector Wise Initial Abnormal Returns
N Mean Std. Deviation T stat Sig. (2-Tailed)
17 65 4.64% 50.61% 4.51 0.00027
Sector wise analysis reveals that some sectors’ IPOs perform better
while some sectors’ IPOs perform weaker than market. As shown in
table 2-(a) and 2-(b) that there were 3 sectors out of 20 whose market
adjusted abnormal returns were negative while rests of the sectors
perform better than that of market. Average sector wise abnormal
return presented in above table No. 1 was 53.82% with standard
deviation of 52.24%. This shows that on average performance of
IPOs on first trading day across sectors was better than market as
presented in table 2-(b).
Table 2-(a)
Sector-wise Average Abnormal Return
Abnormal
Sector Name No of IPOs Return
Fixed line telecommunication 5 -0.54%
Automobile and parts 1 -9.31%
Bank 10 174.14%
Construction and materials 5 14.03%
Oil and gas producers 4 94.02%
Chemicals 7 65.86%
Support services 1 58.61%
Industrial transportation 1 86.40%
General industrials 1 107.68%
Media 4 12.04%
Personal goods 7 -11.64%
Financial services 11 38.46%
Electricity 4 23.56%
Software n computer services 1 32.57%
Industrial metals and mining 2 31.09%
Real estate investment and services 1 99.35%
Segment 1 143.67%
Non life insurance 1 0.92%
Food producers 1 7.92%
Non life insurance 1 58.61%
Total 69 53.82%
Table 2-(b)
Sector wise average first IPO day’s returns
1s t day
1st IPO MARKET Abnormal
S# SECTOR day's return RETURN Returns
Fixed Line
1 Telecommunication (0.02 09) (0 .0156) (0.0054)
2 Automobile and Parts (0.00 50) 0.0881 (0.0931)
3 Bank 1.7958 0.0545 1.7414
Construction and
4 Materials 0.1501 0.0098 0.1403
5 Oil and Gas Producers 1.0470 0.1068 0.9402
6 Chemicals 0.6673 0.0088 0.6586
7 Support Services 0.8300 0.2439 0.5861
In dustrial
8 Transportation 0.7800 (0 .0840) 0.8640
9 General Industrials 1.1500 0.0732 1.0768
10 Media 0.0495 (0 .0709) 0.1204
11 Personal Goods (0.08 55) 0.0309 (0.1164)
12 Financial Services 0.4066 0.0220 0.3846
13 Electricity 0.2435 0.0080 0.2356
Software & Computer
14 Services 0.3620 0.0363 0.3257
In dustrial Metals and
15 Mining 0.4049 0.0940 0.3109
Real Estate , In vest. &
16 Services 1.0643 0.0708 0.9935
17 Segmen t 1.3850 (0 .0517) 1.4367
18 Non Life In surance (0.00 40) (0 .0132) 0.0092
19 Food Producers (0.01 16) (0 .0908) 0.0792
20 Non Life In surance 0.8300 0.2439 0.5861
Average 0.5520 0.0282 0.5352
Table 2- (c)
*significant at 1% level
Figure No. 1
Analysis of Manufacturing, Financial Institutions and Other
services
Year wise analysis shows that in some year IPO performance was
superior to that of others. In year 2008 highest performance of IPOs is
recorded. In year 2008 abnormal return was 195.95%. Overall year wise
market adjusted abnormal return was 45.86% with standard deviation
of 58.16%. During period 2000 to 2011 every year IPO performance
was better that market except year 2010. Results show than on average
performance of IPOs across years was better than market.
Table No. 3
Year -wise Abnormal Returns
N Mean Std. Deviation T Sig. (2-Tailed)
12 45.86% 58.16% 2.73 0.01954
Year-wsie Market Adjusted Abnormal Returns
YEAR No of IPOs MAAP
2000 3 0.0827
2001 2 0.0710
2002 4 0.1037
2003 3 0.6848
2004 10 0.3314
2005 14 0.3036
2006 2 1.0852
2007 9 0.7128
2008 9 1.9595
2009 3 0.1604
2010 6 -0.0108
2011 4 0.0188
TOTAL 69 53.82
Figure No. 2
Figure No. 4
Cumulative Fortnightly Abnormal Returns
Our results are consistent with prior research. Our study found initial
trading day abnormal return of 53.82%. Following table No. 4 show a
comparison of our study with prior studies. As shown our results for
Table No. 4
Initial Day Abnormal Return
Author/Year Country First Day Abn ormal Return
Our Study Pakistan 0.5382
Sohail And Raheman (2010) Pakistan 0.4217
Sohail And Nasar (2007) Pakistan 0.3566
Rizwan And Khan (2007) Pakistan 0.36476
India 0.071
Procianoy And Cigerza (20 07)
Brazil 0.3068
Alvarez And Gonzalez (2001) Spain 0.1177
Rydqvist (1997) Sweden 0.39
Khurshed, Mudambi, And Gergen
U.K 0.0974
(1999)
Michael Firth (1997) Newzealand 0.2587
Long Run IPO performance
Long Run
Author/Year Country Performance Duration
12
-0.84%
Months
24
Our Study Pakistan -6.07%
Months
36
-18.62%
Months
Sohail And Nasar (2007) Pakistan -19.67% 12
Months
-11.26% 12 Moths
Rizwan And Khan (2007) Pakistan 24
-23.68%
Months
China 1.06% 45
Months
44
Procianoy And Cigerza (20 07) India -0.66%
Months
29
Brazil 3.65%
Months
36
Alvarez And Gonzalez (2001) Spain -27.80%
Months
Khurshed, Mudambi, And Gergen 36
U.K -17.81%
(1999) Months
12
-7.72% Months
24
-10.12%
Months
36
Michael Firth (1997) Newzealand 14%
Months
48
16.83%
Months
60
-17.91%
Months
initial trading day and for long run are aligned with researches done
in different countries of the world.
Conclusion
We have analyzed the IPO performance on first trading day and long
run IPO performance for a period of three years on weekly, fortnightly,
and monthly basis. Using market adjusted abnormal return (MAAR)
model study reveals that on first trading day investors are rewarded
with abnormal returns with a mean of 53.82%. Sector-wise analysis
reveals that in some sectors performance of IPOs on first trading day
was better than other. Year wise analysis reveals that some year
performance of IPOs on first trading day was better than other. Year
2008 performance of IPOs on first trading day was at its peak. For
long run weekly, fortnightly and monthly cumulative abnormal returns
(CAR) model show that in long run IPO remain underperformed. For
one year our research shows that stock market rewards its investors
with positive abnormal returns. If investors can get access to primary
market they must invest in IPOs and sell them at the end of the first
trading day. Investors should not keep stock for long time. Before
investing in stock market investor must analyze the history of the
sector as some sectors outperform than others.
References
Agarwal, S. and L. Chunlin. 2003. Investor Demand for IPOs and
Aftermarket Performance: Evidence from the Hong Kong Stock
Market. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions,
and Money, to be published.
Aggarwal, R. K., K. Laurie and W. Kent L. 2001. Strategic IPO Under
pricing, Information Momentum, and Lockup Expiration Selling.
Journal of Financial Economics, 66 (2002) 105–137
Annexure
Table 1
NAME MAAR
WorldCall PayPhone Ltd. 37.46%
Dewan Farooque Motors Ltd. -9.3 1%
Al-Meezan Investment Bank Ltd. -3.3 3%
Bestway Cement 10.25%
Arif Habib Securities Ltd. 3.95%
WorldCall Multimedia -6.3 9%
National Bank Of Pakistan Limited 45.20%
Attock Cement Pakistan Limited 14.65%
Bosicor Pakistan Limited -12.00%
Ittehad Chemicals Limited 60.42%
TRG Pakistan Limited A-class 58.61%
Pakistan International Container Terminal Ltd. 86.40%
Oil & Gas Development Company Limited 40.97%
WorldCall Broadband Limited -4.2 2%
MACPAC Films Limited 107.68%
Callmate Telips Telecom Limited -1.3 1%
Southern Networks Limited 5.15%
Bank Alfalah Limited 75.79%
Pakistan Petroleum Limited 106.75%
Chenab Limited -3.2 7%
First National Equities Limited 14.03%
AMZ Ventures Limited A-class -10.10%
Network Microfinance Bank Limited -14.90%
International Housing Finance Limited -11.00%
Jahangir Siddiqui Capital Markets Limited 32.63%
Attock Petroleum Limited 240.35%
Kot Addu Power Compan y Limited 80.68%
Dewan Farooque Spinning Mills Limited 5.06%
United Bank Limited 36.83%
Eye Television Network Limited 11.57%
Zephyr Textiles Limited 1.81%
Chenab Limited -43.25%
NetSol Technologies Limited 32.57%
WorldCall Telecom Limited -9.1 0%
D. S. Industries Limited 0.10%
Siddiqsons Tin Plate Limited 61.69%
The Bank of Khyber 134.39%
ACADEMIC MOTIVATION
AND PERFORMANCE OF FEMALE
STUDENTS IN CO-EDUCATION
Urfi Khalid Husain1
Abstract
Introduction
Methodology
Results
Table 1
Demographic Information
Demographic Variables Frequency Percentag es%
Age
18-20 years 26 19.5
21-23 years 97 71.6
24 – 26 years 12 8.9
Gender
Male 83 61.5
Female 52 38.5
Semester
Freshman 23 17.0
Sophomore 57 42.2
Junior 36 26.7
Senior 19 14.1
Family Income
20,000 -30,000 Rupees 5 3.7
31,000 -40,000 Rupees 3 2.3
41,000 -50,000 Rupees 27 20.0
51, 000- 60,000 Rupees 18 13.3
61,000 or abov e 82 60.7
Parents Education
Father’s Educati on 2 1.5
Intermediate 21 15.5
Bach elors 58 43.5
Masters 54 39.5
Professional Degree
Mother’s Education
Matric 26 19.3
Intermediate 21 15.6
Bach elors 55 41.0
Masters 23 17.0
Professional Degree 10 7.1
GPA (Current)
0-2.5 17 12.6
2.6-3.67 113 83.7
3.78-4 5 3.7
GPA (Last Semester)
0-2.5 28 20.7
2.6-3.67 100 74.2
3.78-4 7 5.1
Table 2
Table 3
The Mean Difference between Male and Female on the Variable of
Performance Orientation
Gender N Mean Std. T Df Sig
Discussion
Conclusion
References
Bardar, I., M., R. & Loncaric, D. (2006), Goal Orientation, Coping with
School Failure and School Achievement, European Journal
of Psychology of Education,21(1), 53- 70. Retrieved from http/
www.aiaer.net/ejournal/vol21209/10.%20Shelly.pdfý
Dweck, 1986, & Ames. (1992) Cognitive theories, Module 16: Retrieved
from http://highered.mcgrawhill.com/sites/dl/free/007337850x/
611332/boh7850x_CL5Mod16.pdf
Abstract
Introduction
Method
Results
Variables ∆R2 F
Quality of life -.13*
.043 8.02**
Spiritual wellness -.13*
*p< .05, **p< .001
Discussion
Conclusion
References
Furrow, J. L., King, P. E., & White, K. (2004). Religion and positive
youth development: Identity, meaning, and pro-social
concerns. Applied Development Science, 8(1), 17-26.
Gallup, G. (1993).Religion in American. Princeton. NJ: Princeton
Religion and Research Center.
Gregg, K. W., Gibbs, J. C., & Basinger, K. (1994).Patterns of
developmental delay in moral judgement by male and female
delinquents.Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 40, 538-553.
Gutierrez, F. & Shoemaker, L. (2008).Intersections of gender and social
status: Exploring records and documents on criminality in
the Philippines. Unpublished doctoral dissertation,
University of the Philippines, Diliman, Quezon City.
Hamil-Luker, J., Land, D. C., & Blau, J. (2004).Diverse trajectories of
cocaine use through early adulthood among rebellious and
socially conforming youth. Social Science Research, 33, 300-
321.
Helminiak, D. A. (2001).Treating spiritual issues in secular
psychotherapy. Counselingand Values, 45, 163-190.
Hornquist, J. O. (1982). The concept of quality of life. Scandinavian
Journal of Social Medicine, 10, 57-61. Retrieved from http: /
/Journal.diabetes.org/diabetts spectrum /oov 13n1/pg24.htm
Horton, R. (2002). Differences in assessment of symptoms and quality
of life between patients with advanced cancer and their
specialist palliative care nurses in a home care setting.
Palliative Medicine, 16, 488–494. Retrieved from http://
pmj.Sagepub.com/content/16/6/488
Ingersoll, R. E. (1994). Spirituality, religion, and counseling: Dimensions
and relationships. Counseling and Values, 38, 98-111.
Ingersoll, R. E. (1998). Refining dimensions of spiritual wellness: A
cross-traditional approach. Counseling and Values, 42,
156–165.
Ingersoll, R. E. (2000). PPC spirituality as a counseling resource for
adolescents. Retrieved from http://rds.yahoo.com/
csuohio.edu%2fcasal%2Fspirsy1.htm.
THE KULLBACK–
LEIBLER RATIONALE
Zara Omar1
Abstract
1.Introduction:
2.Methods:
2.a. The Logistic and the Normal Ogive Rationales in IRT Models
( ) = ℎ( ) Π ( | )
where ( | ) ( ) ( ) ( ( )) and = + , 1 ≤ ≤ .
( | )= (1 − )1−
( | ) = (1 − ) ( )
= ( = 1| ) = ( ≥ | ) = ( ≤ − + ) = ( + ),
Where
1 The value of the minimax constant to five decimal places is 1.70174 (see
Camilli, 1994). In some sources (e.g., Mcdonald, 1999) it is incorrectly rounded
to 1.701.
FIGURE 1
The logistics distribution with k=1 and standard normal (solid
Line)
FIGURE 2.
The logistic distribution with k = 1.8 and the standard normal
(solid line).
FIGURE 3.
2
/ = −12 + – √2 + 2 (1 + (− )).
( , ) = ( / ) = −12 − √2 + 2 ( (1 + (− )))
( , ) = −1 +2 1 + (− ) = 0 −−2 [ /1 + ( ))] = 0.
3.Conclusion
When using the logistic ogive to approximate normal ogive
in IRT creates the problem regarding finding a logistic density that is
certainly most indistinguishable in the standard normal. A new
solution to this issue, based on minimizing KL facts, has been
proposed. The new scaling constant 1.75 is comparable to the
particular widely used minimax alternative 1.70. The particular KL
qualifying measure is perhaps really the only gauge used to review
densities inside statistical data. The particular KL alternative really
does much better on approximating the particular tails of the
distribution.
References
Appendix
so that h(x) H” “kx for large negative values of x. That is, the
global behavior of this function is at worst linear for all k, and
therefore Eg(h(x))d d, as the standard normal density has finite
moments of all order.
2 ( , ) 1 2 ( )
2 = 2 + 2 ( )2
≥ 0 for all k ≥ 0,
1+
( , ) 1
= − − 2 ( )
1+ ( )
and
l .
Thus, there exists a unique solution.
Introduction
over the years; orient themselves with the faculty and their profile; be
aware of the key requirements of the institutions; evaluate the
performance of the educational institution just by a click (Wild, Smith,
and Walker, 2001). In addition to this, due to the very nature of the
academic institutions, greater part of the resources related with
instructional programs are allocated to personnel expenses- i.e. to
salaries and other benefit programs for faculty and other non teaching
staff (Henry, 2001). With the help of DSS one could compare and
evaluate the consumption of various resources over short time intervals
less than the full duration of an activity and on that basis, could
allocate resources very efficiently (James Gantt, 1987).
Conclusion
and data analysis and in the later part data decision making (Thorn,
2001). Secondly, decision making is considered to be highly complex
activity that might not necessary always be informed by the data and
would need circumstantial analysis beyond the apparent facts and so
there is always a question of reliability and benefit of doubt for each
decision that is made. Information systems are highly technologically
oriented and have a huge data set, a flaw in technology could lead to
an unreliable decision and result in a chaos (Salpeter, 2004).
References
Aydina2, J. G. (1997). Evaluating the Impact of Health Care Information
Systems. International Journal of Technology Assessment
in Health Care, 13(2), 380-393.
Dr. Bibi Asia Naz, D. A. (2013, July). Decision Making Practices in the
Universities of Pakistan (A Comparative Study). International
Journal of Business and Social Science, 4(7), 274-278.
Wild, P., Smith, D., and and Walker, J. (2001). Has a Decade of
Computerization Made a Difference in School Management.
Pathways to Institutional Improvement with Information
Technology in Educational Management, 99-120.
Although this book is set in the context of the American urban school,
many novice and experienced teachers locally would find truths in
these narratives that are nevertheless relevant. As such, it is a valuable
addition for professional reading in all urban school contexts,
particularly those where poor resources, crime, language disparity
and poverty pose dilemmas for teachers. Graduate researchers and
policy makers in the education sector stand to benefit from the rich
academic groundwork of this book as well.
INSTRUCTIONS TO AUTHORS
(Research Section)
INSTRUCTIONS TO AUTHORS
(Research Section)
For periodicals
Baumol, W.J., 1982, Applied fairness theory and rational policy, American Economic
Review, 72(4): 639561.
Note that journal titles should not be abbreviated.
10 . Illustrations should be provided in triplicate (one original drawn in black ink on white
paper and or with two photocopies). Care should be taken that lettering and symbols
are of a comparable size. The drawings should not be inserted in the text and should
be marked on the back with figure numbers, title of paper and name of author. All
graphs and diagrams should be numbered consecutively in the text in arabic numerals.
Graph paper should be ruled in blue and any grid lines to be shown should be inked
black. Illustrations of insufficient quality which have to be redrawn by the publisher
will be charged to the author.
11 . All unessential tables should be eliminated from the manuscript. Tables should be
numbered consecutively in the text in arabic numerals and typed on separate sheets.
Any manuscript which does not conform to the instructions may be returned for
necessary revision before publication.
12. As per the revised policy IOBM faculty members have to publish one paper in
the PBR every year.
13. The paper should belong to core management subjects. Papers on sports,
literature, fiction, biography, fashion, philosophy etc. falloutside the scope of
the PBR.
14. Papers and references should conform to the APA format.