Hasil Analisis Data SPSS

Univariat

jenis_kelamin

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative

Percent

laki-laki 20 21,7 21,7 21,7

Valid perempuan 72 78,3 78,3 100,0

Total 92 100,0 100,0

Bivariat

1. Perokok

Kategori_perokok * Tekanan_Darah Crosstabulation

Tekanan_Darah Total

kasus kontrol

Count 2 1 3

perokok Expected Count 1.5 1.5 3.0

% within Kategori_perokok 66.7% 33.3% 100.0%

Kategori_perokok
Count 44 45 89

tidak perokok Expected Count 44.5 44.5 89.0

% within Kategori_perokok 49.4% 50.6% 100.0%

Count 46 46 92

Total Expected Count 46.0 46.0 92.0

% within Kategori_perokok 50.0% 50.0% 100.0%

 Chi-Square Tests

Value df Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
sided) sided) sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square .345 1 .557
b
Continuity Correction .000 1 1.000
Likelihood Ratio .351 1 .554
Fisher's Exact Test 1.000 .500
Linear-by-Linear Association .341 1 .559
N of Valid Cases 92

a. 2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.50.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

Value 95% Confidence Interval

Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for 2.045 .179 23.378

Kategori_perokok (perokok /
tidak perokok)
For cohort Tekanan_Darah 1.348 .590 3.084
= kasus
For cohort Tekanan_Darah .659 .131 3.310
= kontrol
N of Valid Cases 92
 2. Stress

Tingkat_stres * Tekanan_Darah Crosstabulation

Tekanan_Darah Total

kasus kontrol

Count 18 11 29

stres Expected Count 14.5 14.5 29.0

% within Tingkat_stres 62.1% 37.9% 100.0%

Tingkat_stres
Count 28 35 63

tidak stres Expected Count 31.5 31.5 63.0

% within Tingkat_stres 44.4% 55.6% 100.0%

Count 46 46 92

Total Expected Count 46.0 46.0 92.0

% within Tingkat_stres 50.0% 50.0% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Value df Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
sided) sided) sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square 2.467 1 .116
b
Continuity Correction 1.813 1 .178
Likelihood Ratio 2.486 1 .115
Fisher's Exact Test .178 .089
Linear-by-Linear Association 2.441 1 .118
N of Valid Cases 92

a. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 14.50.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

Value 95% Confidence Interval

Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for 2.045 .832 5.030

Tingkat_stres (stres / tidak
stres)
For cohort Tekanan_Darah 1.397 .939 2.076
= kasus
For cohort Tekanan_Darah .683 .408 1.143
= kontrol
N of Valid Cases 92
 3. IMT

IMT * Tekanan_Darah Crosstabulation

Tekanan_Darah Total

kasus kontrol

Count 12 5 17

obesitas Expected Count 8.5 8.5 17.0

% within IMT 70.6% 29.4% 100.0%

Count 26 21 47

IMT pre-obesitas Expected Count 23.5 23.5 47.0

% within IMT 55.3% 44.7% 100.0%

Count 8 20 28

normal Expected Count 14.0 14.0 28.0

% within IMT 28.6% 71.4% 100.0%

Count 46 46 92

Total Expected Count 46.0 46.0 92.0

% within IMT 50.0% 50.0% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-

sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square 8.557 2 .014
Likelihood Ratio 8.816 2 .012
Linear-by-Linear Association 8.174 1 .004
N of Valid Cases 92

a. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum

expected count is 8.50.
 Risk Estimate

Value 95% Confidence Interval

Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for 6.000 1.592 22.616

Obesitas_Normal (obesitas /
normal)
For cohort Tekanan_Darah 2.471 1.275 4.786
= kasus
For cohort Tekanan_Darah .412 .190 .892
= kontrol
N of Valid Cases 45

Risk Estimate

Value 95% Confidence Interval

Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for 3.095 1.137 8.426

Preobesitas_Normal
(preobesitas / normal)
For cohort Tekanan_Darah 1.936 1.021 3.670
= kasus
For cohort Tekanan_Darah .626 .421 .929
= kontrol
N of Valid Cases 75