2198.full 2
2198.full 2
2198.full 2
5
0099-2240/02/$04.00⫹0 DOI: 10.1128/AEM.68.5.2198–2208.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Endophytic bacteria are bacteria that live in plant tissues Endophytes inside a plant may either become localized at the
without doing substantive harm or gaining benefit other than point of entry or spread throughout the plant (17). These
residency (20, 21). Bacterial endophytes can be isolated from microorganisms can reside within cells (19), in the intercellular
surface-disinfected plant tissue or extracted from internal plant spaces, (31) or in the vascular system (3).
tissue (17). As cited in the extensive review of Kobayashi and Significant variations in the populations of both indige-
Palumbo (21), both gram-positive and gram-negative bacterial nous and introduced endophytes have been reported. These
endophytes have been isolated from several tissue types in variations are attributed to plant source, plant age, tissue
numerous plant species. Furthermore, several different bacte- type, time of sampling, and environment. Generally, bacte-
rial species have been isolated from a single plant (21). Endo- rial populations are larger in roots and decrease in the stems
phytes enter plant tissue primarily through the root zone; how- and leaves (24). Natural endophyte concentrations can vary
ever, aerial portions of plants, such as flowers, stems, and between 2.0 and 6.0 log10 CFU per g for alfalfa, sweet corn,
cotyledons, may also be used for entry (21). Specifically, the sugar beet, squash, cotton, and potato, as described by
bacteria enter tissues via germinating radicles (14), secondary Kobayashi and Palumbo (21). Similar results were obtained
roots (1), stomates (36), or as a result of foliar damage (25). for endophytic bacteria inoculated by root or seed drench-
ing, with the population levels reaching between 3.0 and 5.0
log10 CFU/g of plant tissue for tomato and potato (21). The
* Corresponding author. Mailing address for Anne K. Vidaver: De-
partment of Plant Pathology, University of Nebraska, 406C Plant Sci- levels of colonization by nonpathogenic endophytes tend to
ences Hall, Lincoln, NE 68583-0722. Phone: (402) 472-2858. Fax: (402) be far less than the levels of colonization by pathogenic
472-2853. E-mail: avidaver1@unl.edu. Mailing address for Raúl G. bacteria; the concentrations of the latter organisms range
Barletta: Department of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, Univer-
from 7.0 to 10.0 log10 CFU/g (fresh weight) of tissue in
sity of Nebraska, 211 Veterinary Basic Sciences, Lincoln, NE 68583-
0905. Phone: (402) 472-8543. Fax: (402) 472-9690. E-mail: susceptible infected plants (15, 45).
rbarletta@unl.edu. Our research goal was to determine the prevalence, proper-
† This is a contribution of the University of Nebraska Agricultural ties, persistence, and types of endophytic bacteria in agronomic
Research Division, Lincoln, Journal Series no. 13445.
and native plants. In this study, 853 different endophytic colo-
‡ Present address: Alex R. Masson Incorporated, Linwood, KS
66052. nizing bacterial strains were isolated from four agronomic crop
§ Present address: 7320 Raven Circle, Lincoln, NE 68506. species and 27 prairie plant species. Six of the most promising
储 Present address: Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest colonizing strains were identified taxonomically as species of
Management, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-
Cellulomonas, Clavibacter, Curtobacterium, and Microbacte-
1177.
# Present address: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Pennington, NJ rium by fatty acid, carbon source utilization, and 16S rRNA
08534. gene sequence analyses.
2198
VOL. 68, 2002 ENDOPHYTIC BACTERIA IN PLANTS 2199
TABLE 1. Phenotypic characterization of endophytic bacteria from agronomic crops and prairie plants
Agronomic crops
Glycine max (soybean) 60 17 17e
Sorghum bicolor (sorghum) 120 353 (151) 137 (75) 173 (76) 43 (0)f
Triticum aestivum (wheat) 48 28 28 (0)e
Zea mays (corn) 90 336 (222) 164 (134) 136 (88) 36 (0)f
Total 318 734 (373) 301 (209) 309 (164) 124 (0)
Prairie plants
Agropyron elongatum (tall wheatgrass) 1 1 1
Agropyron intermedium (intermediate 1 1 1
wheatgrass)
MATERIALS AND METHODS (cultivars Mo17 ⫻ B73 and RN11) and sorghum (cultivars RS626 and Dekalb 61)
were randomly collected during the growing season (June to September) from 10
Bacterial strains. The type strain of Microbacterium testaceum, IFO 12675, was
healthy mature plants per site at four different geographical locations. Individual
received from Mariko Takeuchi, Institute for Fermentation, Osaka, Japan. A
total of 853 endophytic strains were isolated from diverse hosts. The following plants were severed aseptically 3 cm above the soil level, and the stalks were
strains were given special designations: CE648, isolated from dent corn; LB030, stripped of leaves, put into plastic bags, and kept on ice until further processing.
isolated from little bluestem; PD039, isolated from prairie dropseed; SE017 and In the laboratory, the stalks were wiped with 70% ethanol and flame sterilized,
SE034, isolated from sorghum; and SG041, isolated from sideoats grama. and each stalk was dissected into a segment containing the third, fourth, and fifth
Plant sources. A broad range of agronomic and prairie plants common to the nodes. A crosscut through the stalk 2 cm above the third node was made, and a
midwestern United States were surveyed for the presence of potential endo- sterile no. 8 cork borer was inserted to a depth of at least 2 cm. The outer stalk
phytic bacteria. Plants were selected based either on their economic importance was removed, exposing a cylinder of tissue inside the cork borer.
to agriculture or on their perennial nature and thus their potential ability to Soybean, wheat, and prairie plants were collected in the field during early
support stable bacterial ecosystems (Table 1). The agronomic plants screened summer (May and June) as described above. Plant leaves and stems were surface
were maize (corn), sorghum, soybeans, and wheat. The prairie plants tested sterilized for 10 s with 2% sodium hypochlorite containing 0.1% Tween 20
included various native species of grasses, forbs, legumes, and prairie wildflow- (Sigma-Aldrich Co., St. Louis, Mo.). To remove the disinfectant, sections were
ers. The agronomic plants were harvested from field plots located 300 miles apart rinsed five times each in two washes of nonsterile deionized distilled water and
in Nebraska, and the prairie plants were collected from three virgin prairies and a wash of sterile water; the sections were dried with sterile paper towels. All
an established prairie grass plot within 25 miles of Lincoln, Nebr. agronomic crop and prairie plant samples were placed into polyethylene bags
Isolation of endophytic bacteria. Putative endophytic bacterial strains were (Associated Bag Co., Milwaukee, Wis.) and either comminuted using a rolling
defined as isolates that were obtained from surface-sterilized plants, displayed press machine (Precision Machine Co., Lincoln, Nebr.) or dissected into ca. 1-cm
differentiable colony morphologies, and were recovered from the initial survey of pieces and macerated with either a sterile mortar and pestle or a sterile Polytron
agronomic crops and prairie grasses. For corn and sorghum, endophytic popu- homogenizer (Brinkman Instruments, Westbury, N.Y.). Tissue extracts were
lations were collected from the pith tissue of stalks. Samples of dent corn then serially diluted in 12.5 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.1) (phosphate
2200 ZINNIEL ET AL. APPL. ENVIRON. MICROBIOL.
buffer) and plated in triplicate to recover any bacterial endophytes present in the inoculation of seven replicates with 8.0 log10 CFU of bacteria/plant (homologous
plant tissue. studies) were conducted in the same manner, with minor modifications. Mono-
Preliminary studies were conducted to evaluate the efficacy of the decontam- cots lacking a dominant stem were inoculated in one to three stems per plant,
ination procedures. Stalks of corn and sorghum plants were sprayed with a and wheat crowns were injected with 100 l of inoculum.
suspension containing 7.0 log10 CFU of the orange-pigmented organism Isolation of endophytic bacteria from experimentally inoculated plants. For
Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. nebraskensis per ml before the sterilization pro- the initial time point (1 day postinoculation), whole-plant samples of corn and
cedure described above was performed. Subsequent colony counting demon- sorghum were obtained as described above. For subsequent samples, partial
strated that the external bacterial recovery levels were 2.5 log10 CFU/g (fresh plant sections were collected from the lower main stem, the lowest nonsenescent
weight) or less. Without this procedure, virtually all the colonies recovered (6.0 leaf, a midstem leaf, and a newly expanded leaf. The only exception was for
to 7.0 log10 CFU/g [fresh weight]) were colonies of the sprayed bacteria. Thus, whole-plant samples of seedlings in the growth room studies. Plant sections were
our decontamination procedure effectively reduced potential external contami- surface sterilized as described above for soybean, wheat, and prairie plants.
nation by more than 10,000-fold. Before samples were pooled in polyethylene bags, a section that was 1 by 4 cm
Bacterial growth conditions. All bacteria were grown on plates at 27°C for 48 was cut aseptically from the interior stem tissue and a 5-cm-long sample was
to 72 h. Liquid cultures were grown for 16 h in a PsycroTherm shaking incubator dissected aseptically from the middle portion of the longitudinal axis of each leaf.
(New Brunswick Scientific, New Brunswick, N.J.) at 250 rpm. Bacto Agar (Difco Plant tissues were weighed, processed by the rolling press method, diluted, and
Laboratories, Detroit, Mich.) was added as a solidifying agent at a concentration plated as described above.
Statistical analysis. The data were analyzed by using SAS, version 8 (SAS for the remaining isolates due to culture loss in storage or the
Institute Inc., Cary, N.C.), analysis of variance, as well as by using least-square variability of Gram reaction results.
means to test for pairwise differences when overall effects were present.
A more extensive phenotypic characterization was carried
16S rRNA gene amplification and sequencing. Genomic DNA was isolated by
using standard bacterial procedures (38). The following primers were used for out with 373 culturable microorganisms recovered from corn
PCR amplification of the 16S ribosomal DNA: p515FPL (5⬘-GTGCCAGCAG (222 isolates) and sorghum (151 isolates). A total of 209 of
CCGCGGTAA-3⬘) (35), p13B (5⬘-AGGCCCGGGAACGTATTCAC-3⬘) (34), these endophytes were confirmed to be gram-positive organ-
and PCR-1 (5⬘-AGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAGGA-3⬘). Each reaction mixture isms, and 164 were gram-negative organisms (Table 1). As
contained Taq DNA polymerase (Promega, Madison, Wis.), 1.5 mM magnesium
expected, more gram-negative bacteria than gram-positive bac-
chloride, each deoxynucleoside triphosphate at a concentration of 0.1 mM, 10%
(vol/vol) dimethyl sulfoxide (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, Pa.), 0.4 mM spermi- teria were motile. Chitin utilization was positive for 157 gram-
dine (Sigma-Aldrich Co.), each primer (Integrated DNA Technologies, Cor- positive and 117 gram-negative isolates (data not shown).
alville, Iowa) at a concentration of 10 pM, and 10 ng of DNA per l. The Analysis of resistance to various antibiotics showed that 20%
thermocycling conditions consisted of a denaturation step at 94°C for 3 min, 30 of the corn and sorghum isolates were sensitive to all of the
amplification cycles of 94°C for 1 min, 57°C for 1 min, and 72°C for 2 min, and
antibiotics at the concentrations tested (data not shown). For
a final polymerization step of 72°C for 4 min with a GeneAmp PCR System 9600
TABLE 2. Bacterial endophyte recovery from agronomic crops and prairie plants grown in either the greenhouse or the growth room
No. of isolates No. of isolates Colonization levelb
Plant host species
tested recovereda (avg ⫾ SD)
Greenhouse studiesc
Agronomic crop
Wheat 14 0
Prairie plants
Intermediate wheatgrass 1 0
Big bluestem 7 3 3.6 ⫾ 0.2 (3.5–3.9)
Little bluestem 10 6 4.7 ⫾ 1.3 (4.7 ⫾ 1.3 (3.6–7.0)
Cudweed sagewort 2 1 4.5
Milkweed 15 0
Whorled milkweed 2 0
Sideoats grama 11 3 5.0 ⫾ 0.9 (4.0–5.7)
Blue grama 8 3 5.3 ⫾ 1.5 (3.6–6.4)
zation levels in sorghum seedlings; five of these isolates colo- colonize corn seedlings at titers ranging from 9.0 to 9.6 log10
nized both corn and sorghum seedlings. Of the endophytes CFU/plant (data not shown). Likewise, all of these isolates
inoculated into corn and sorghum seedlings, six strains ap- colonized sorghum seedlings at levels of 6.6 to 8.6 log10 CFU/
peared to be specific for sorghum and one strain appeared to plant. These isolates also exhibited colonization levels of 0.8 to
be specific for corn. In summary, 69 strains were recovered 4.7 log10 CFU/g (fresh weight) over an extended host range.
from either corn or sorghum seedlings at desirable concentra- All three colonized geranium and cucumber; in addition,
tions (8.3 log10 CFU/plant or higher). SE017 colonized wheat, potato, and tomato, while SE034 grew
Based on the growth room assays described above, we se- in tomato and milkweed (data not shown).
lected 19 corn endophytes and 10 sorghum endophytes to Extensive long-range greenhouse studies and field trials
perform host range studies in the greenhouse in order to test were performed with nine bacterial endophytes from corn
the ability of these microorganisms to colonize diverse plant and eight bacterial endophytes from sorghum showing sig-
species, including those listed in Table 3. Cucumber and to- nificant colonization levels in at least one of the types of
mato plants supported growth of about 60% of the corn and seedlings. These strains were introduced into greenhouse-
sorghum endophytes, respectively. Most endophytes (26 of 29 grown dent corn in order to determine the titers achievable
strains) were able to colonize at least one species different throughout most of the corn plant life cycle, through day 67
from the original host at levels ranging from 0.1 to 5.8 log10 postinoculation (Table 4). All strains were recovered at the
CFU/g (fresh weight), and two endophytes were able to colo- highest levels early in the study (days 1 and 11), and the
nize five or six plant species. average colonization levels were 6.1 ⫾ 0.1 log10 CFU/g
The corn and sorghum endophytes CE648, SE017, and (fresh weight). By day 67, the colonization levels had de-
SE034 (see Materials and Methods) were able to consistently creased by about 10-fold (Table 4). The colonization levels
VOL. 68, 2002 ENDOPHYTIC BACTERIA IN PLANTS 2203
TABLE 3. Corn and sorghum endophyte populations in a range of hosts determined in greenhouse studies
Corn endophytes Sorghum endophytes
Plant host species
b
(common name) No. of Colonization level No. of Colonization levelb
isolatesa (avg ⫾ SD) isolatesa (avg ⫾ SD)
Allium cepa (onion) 17 (8) 3.9 ⫾ 1.2 (2.4–5.8) 7 (2) 3.5 ⫾ 0.8 (2.9–4.1)
Asclepias syriaca (milkweed) 19 (0) 0 10 (2) 1.3 ⫾ 0.4 (1.0–1.5)
Cucumis sativus (cucumber) 19 (11) 1.5 ⫾ 1.2 (0.1–3.8) 10 (5) 1.3 ⫾ 1.3 (0.4–3.5)
Pelargonium ⫻ hortorum (geranium) 19 (2) 1.9 ⫾ 0.1 (1.8–1.9) 10 (4) 3.2 ⫾ 1.3 (1.4–4.3)
Glycine max (soybean) NDc ND 7 (0) 0
Lycopersicon esculentum (tomato) 19 (4) 1.7 ⫾ 1.0 (1.0–3.1) 10 (6) 2.0 ⫾ 1.6 (0.8–4.6)
Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco) 16 (4) 3.0 ⫾ 1.0 (2.3–4.5) 10 (3) 2.7 ⫾ 0.2 (2.5–2.8)
Solanum tuberosum (potato) 19 (6) 2.8 ⫾ 0.3 (2.5–3.2) 10 (5) 3.0 ⫾ 0.4 (2.7–3.6)
Triticum aestivum (wheat) 15 (2) 3.1 ⫾ 1.5 (2.0–4.1) 5 (2) 4.6 ⫾ 0.1 (4.5–4.7)
a
Number of isolates tested (inoculated at a level of 6.0 log10 CFU/plant). The numbers in parentheses are the numbers of isolates recovered.
for corn and sorghum endophytes were not significantly tently observed. The colonization levels were maintained
different over the course of the study. throughout all major growth stages of the plants, and the levels
Since bacterial endophytes could be recovered from artifi- of recovery were similar or only slightly reduced over the
cially inoculated corn plants in the greenhouse over an ex- sampling period for 9 of the 13 bacterial strains in each field
tended period of time, another study was conducted in field trial. The average population levels for the remaining four
trials, which provided a fluctuating environment. In two sepa- isolates were less than 2.0 log10 CFU/g (fresh weight). There
rate field trials, five corn endophytes and eight sorghum iso- was no significant difference between corn and sorghum endo-
lates were tested. All of these strains were recovered from phytes in both field trials.
growing dent corn plants through day 71 postinoculation (field Long-range quantitative population data for selected corn
trial I) or day 78 postinoculation (field trial II) (Table 4). (strain CE648) and sorghum (strains SE017 and SE034) endo-
Similar to the greenhouse experiments, the highest coloniza- phytes in greenhouse- and field-grown corn are shown in Fig.
tion levels at both sites were observed on day 1, and at the 1A to C. Isolates CE648 and SE034 displayed the greatest
remaining times moderate levels of colonization were consis- colonization titers for early samples in the greenhouse studies
TABLE 4. Recovery of wild-type agronomic crop endophytic bacteria from dent corn
Corn endophytes Sorghum endophytes
Location Daya No. of Colonization level c
No. of Colonization levelc
isolatesb (avg ⫾ SD) isolatesb (avg ⫾ SD)
Greenhouse
1 9 (9) 6.1 ⫾ 0.1 (4.7–6.8)d,e 8 (8) 5.7 ⫾ 0.1 (4.9–6.7)e
11 9 (9) 5.1 ⫾ 0.2 (4.5–6.3)f 8 (7) 5.7 ⫾ 0.2 (4.9–6.7)f
67 9 (3) 4.4 ⫾ 0.3 (2.6–5.9) 8 (3) 4.3 ⫾ 0.3 (3.5–5.2)
Field trial I
1 5 (5) 5.4 ⫾ 0.2 (4.2–6.6)g 8 (7) 5.0 ⫾ 0.2 (3.8–6.0)g
9 5 (5) 4.1 ⫾ 0.2 (3.4–5.1) 8 (8) 4.2 ⫾ 0.2 (3.4–5.4)h
21 5 (2) 4.0 ⫾ 0.3 (3.5–4.4) 8 (6) 3.8 ⫾ 0.2 (3.0–4.4)
46 5 (4) 3.8 ⫾ 0.2 (2.9–4.7) 8 (8) 3.8 ⫾ 0.2 (2.7–4.7)
71 5 (3) 3.8 ⫾ 0.2 (3.1–4.9) 8 (6) 3.7 ⫾ 0.2 (2.3–4.3)
Field trial II
1 5 (5) 4.5 ⫾ 0.2 (3.4–5.7)i 8 (7) 4.4 ⫾ 0.2 (2.7–5.8)i
14 5 (2) 4.2 ⫾ 0.3 (2.9–5.1) 8 (7) 4.1 ⫾ 0.2 (3.2–4.9)j
26 5 (2) 3.4 ⫾ 0.3 (3.0–3.8) 8 (5) 3.6 ⫾ 0.2 (2.4–4.2)
52 5 (3) 3.8 ⫾ 0.3 (3.0–5.4) 8 (5) 3.8 ⫾ 0.2 (3.4–4.6)
78 5 (2) 3.5 ⫾ 0.3 (2.5–4.2) 8 (5) 3.4 ⫾ 0.2 (2.6–4.3)
a
Number of days between inoculation and plant harvest.
b
Number of isolates tested (inoculated at a level of 7.0 log10 CFU/plant). The numbers in parentheses are the numbers of isolates recovered.
c
Titer for each day expressed as log10 CFU/g (fresh weight). The values in parentheses are the lowest and highest average titers.
d
Significant difference (P ⬍ 0.05) between days 1 and 11.
e
Significant difference (P ⬍ 0.05) between days 1 and 67.
f
Significant difference (P ⬍ 0.05) between days 11 and 67.
g
Significant difference (P ⬍ 0.05) when day 1 was compared to days 9, 21, 46, and 71.
h
Significant difference (P ⬍ 0.05) when day 9 was compared to days 21 and 71.
i
Significant difference (P ⬍ 0.05) when day 1 was compared to days 26, 52, and 78.
j
Significant difference (P ⬍ 0.05) between days 14 and 78.
2204 ZINNIEL ET AL. APPL. ENVIRON. MICROBIOL.
ceum isolates by the 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis, we moderate to high levels through 42 days postinoculation (Table
tested the type strain of M. testaceum in long-range greenhouse 2). To our knowledge, this is the first experimental greenhouse
colonization studies. The results demonstrated that this organ- study of colonization of prairie plants by bacterial endophytes.
ism was able to colonize dent corn at levels similar to the levels However, other workers have conducted similar studies in
of colonization by the agronomic crop endophyte strains iso- growth chambers. For example, the rhizobacterium Pseudomo-
lated in our study (Fig. 1D). nas aureofaciens was inoculated and was recovered after 29
days from tall fescue leaves and pea and bean stems at a level
of 2.3 log10 CFU/g (fresh weight) (24).
DISCUSSION
The ability of corn and sorghum endophytes to colonize and
Our research goals were to survey agronomic crops and persist in dent corn and sorghum was initially shown by using
prairie plants for the presence of endophytic bacteria and to seedlings (Table 2). Based on an inoculum level of 6.0 log10
determine their phenotypic properties, their taxonomic posi- CFU/plant, some multiplication of the endophytes occurred in
tions, and their colonization levels in experimentally inocu- many plants. This is the first demonstration of endophytic
lated plants. In this study, we isolated several hundred bacte- colonization of experimentally inoculated sorghum seedlings.
rial strains from dent corn, sorghum, soybean, wheat, perennial A subset of endophytes identified in the growth room studies
grasses, forbs, legumes, and prairie wildflowers (Table 1). Sim- that yielded high levels of colonization were analyzed in more
ilarly, other workers have reported isolation of indigenous comprehensive long-range greenhouse studies and field trials
endophytic bacteria from yellow dent type corn (7), sweet corn in which dent corn was used as the host. As expected, the
(12, 28), and alfalfa (14). To our knowledge, our study is the colonization rates observed in the greenhouse were higher
first to describe indigenous bacterial endophytes isolated from than those achieved in the field. In the field, there is increased
sorghum, soybean, wheat, and native perennial plants. There microbial competition, the cultural practices, such as irrigation,
appears to be significant variation in the types of indigenous are less consistent, and there may be unfavorable environmen-
bacteria isolated from diverse host plant species. Several fac- tal conditions, such as high temperatures. In contrast, the ster-
tors may explain these differences, including host specificity, ile seedling inoculation experiments resulted in population lev-
geographical distribution, plant age, and tissue type (21). els that were usually 10-fold higher than the levels in the
In our colonization studies of prairie plant endophytes in the greenhouse. Most of the corn and sorghum endophytes per-
greenhouse, we demonstrated that most of the introduced en- sisted at significant average colonization levels ranging be-
dophytic strains could recolonize the original plant host at tween 3.4 and 6.1 log10 CFU/g (fresh weight) in the greenhouse
2206 ZINNIEL ET AL. APPL. ENVIRON. MICROBIOL.
and fields for up to 67 and 78 days, respectively (Table 4 and except SE017, which was identified as a Cellulomonas strain by
Fig. 1). Antibiotic-resistant mutants obtained from selected fatty acid analysis and as a Microbacterium strain by the other
strains of these endophytes could also colonize plants at levels two methods. The endophytes PD039 (Clavibacter michiganen-
similar to the levels of wild-type strains in these greenhouse sis) and SE034 (M. testaceum) were each identified as the same
and field experiments. In this context, similar results were organism at the genus and species levels by all tests.
obtained in other plant species for antibiotic-resistant mutants, The close association observed between soil and plant envi-
as reviewed by Kobayashi and Palumbo (21), for Bacillus sub- ronments suggests a potential endophytic role for Cellulomo-
tilis, Erwinia sp., and Pseudomonas. In one of these studies, nas and Microbacterium strains. Our studies identified for the
Frommel et al. (13) obtained higher average population levels first time the endophytic nature of M. testaceum for various
of rifampin- and nalidixic acid-resistant mutants of Pseudomo- plant hosts. Cellulomonas flavigena has been isolated as an
nas sp. in potato roots in both greenhouse studies and field epiphytic bacterium from the surfaces of olive leaves (10),
trials. This result may be a reflection of the ability of Pseudo- while M. testaceum was isolated from Chinese rice paddies
monas sp. to establish high population densities in the rhizo- (23). Researchers have identified microbial antagonists be-
have a multitude of applications that enhance agricultural pro- 16. Gross, D. C., and A. K. Vidaver. 1979. A selective medium for isolation of
Corynebacterium nebraskense from soil and plant parts. Phytopathology 69:
duction; they enhance wheat growth through production of 82–87.
phytohormones (2), increase rice production by increasing 17. Hallmann, J., A. Quadt-Hallmann, W. F. Mahaffee, and J. W. Kloepper.
mineral availability (30), increase cotton disease resistance (5), 1997. Bacterial endophytes in agricultural crops. Can. J. Microbiol. 43:895–
914.
contribute to corn pest management (11), fix nitrogen in rice 18. Hallmann, J., R. Rodriguez-Kabana, and J. W. Kloepper. 1999. Chitin-
and wheat (49), decrease susceptibility to frost damage (51), mediated changes in bacterial communities of the soil, rhizosphere and
and increase potato tuber formation under heat stress condi- within roots of cotton in relation to nematode control. Soil Biol. Biochem.
31:551–560.
tions (4). Environmentally, the use of specific endophytes may 19. Jacobs, M. J., W. M. Bugbee, and D. A. Gabrielson. 1985. Enumeration,
be preferable to the use of nonspecific chemical fertilizers and location, and characterization of endophytic bacteria within sugar beet roots.
pesticides because of cost, time effectiveness, and contributions Can. J. Bot. 63:1262–1265.
20. Kado, C. I. 1992. Plant pathogenic bacteria, p. 659–674. In A. Balows, H. G.
to sustainable agricultural systems. Truper, M. Dworkin, W. Harder, and K.-H. Schleifer (ed.), The prokaryotes,
This study demonstrated the occurrence and diversity of vol. I. Springer-Verlag, New York, N.Y.
culturable endophytes in a large number of plant species. The 21. Kobayashi, D. Y., and J. D. Palumbo. 2000. Bacterial endophytes and their
effects on plants and uses in agriculture, p. 199–233. In C. W. Bacon and J. F.
method for Gram differentiation of plant pathogenic and saprophytic bac- 47. Vidaver, A. K. 1982. The plant pathogenic corynebacteria. Annu. Rev. Mi-
teria without staining. Phytopathology 72:917–918. crobiol. 36:495–517.
42. Takeuchi, M., and K. Hatano. 1998. Proposal of six new species in the genus 48. Vidaver, A. K. 1967. Synthetic and complex media for the rapid detection of
Microbacterium and transfer of Flavobacterium marinotypicum ZoBell and fluorescence of phytopathogenic pseudomonads: effect of the carbon source.
Upham to the genus Microbacterium as Microbacterium maritypicum comb. Appl. Microbiol. 15:1523–1524.
nov. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 48:973–982. 49. Webster, G., C. Gough, J. Vasse, C. A. Batchelor, K. J. O’Callaghan, S. L.
43. Takeuchi, M., and K. Hatano. 1998. Union of the genera Microbacterium Kothari, M. R. Davey, J. Dénarié, and E. C. Cocking. 1997. Interactions of
Orla-Jensen and Aureobacterium Collins et al. in a redefined genus Microbac- rhizobia with rice and wheat. Plant Soil 194:115–122.
terium. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 48:739–747. 50. White, D. G. 1999. Compendium of corn diseases, 3rd ed. American Phyto-
44. Tang, Y. W., N. M. Ellis, M. K. Hopkins, D. H. Smith, D. E. Dodge, and D. H. pathological Society Press, St. Paul, Minn.
Persing. 1998. Comparison of phenotypic and genotypic techniques for iden- 51. Xu, H., M. Griffith, C. L. Patten, and B. R. Glick. 1998. Isolation and
tification of unusual aerobic pathogenic gram-negative bacilli. J. Clin. Mi- characterization of an antifreeze protein with ice nucleation activity from the
crobiol. 36:3674–3679. plant growth promoting rhizobacterium Pseudomonas putida GR12–2. Can.
45. Tsiantos, J., and W. A. Stevens. 1986. The population dynamics of Coryne- J. Microbiol. 44:64–73.
bacterium michiganense pv. michiganensis and other selected bacteria in 52. Yokota, A., M. Takeuchi, T. Sakane, and N. Weiss. 1993. Proposal of six new
tomato leaves. Phytopathol. Mediterr. 25:160–162. species in the genus Aureobacterium and transfer of Flavobacterium esteraro-
46. Vargas-Ayala, R., R. Rodriguez-Kabana, G. Morgan-Jones, J. A. McInroy, maticum Omelianski to the genus Aureobacterium as Aureobacterium ester-
and J. W. Kloepper. 2000. Shifts in soil microflora induced by velvetbean aromaticum comb. nov. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 43:555–564.