Ereneta Reviewer
Ereneta Reviewer
Ereneta Reviewer
Atty. Ereneta
1. Private rights
Chapter 1 The chief concern of administrative law is
INTRODUCTION the protection of private rights
Subject matter of administrative law is the
nature and the mode of exercise of
Concept of administrative law
administrative power and the system of
Administrative law belongs to the field of public law
relief against administrative action
(as opposed to private law)
Law which provides the structure of government
2. Delegated powers and combined powers
and prescribes its procedure
Administrative law is concerned with
The law of governmental administration
officers and agencies exercising delegated
Part of public law which fixes the organization and
powers and NOT with the exercise of the
determines the competence of the administrative
constitutional powers of the President
authorities, and indicates to the individual,
It is concerned with and results from a
remedies for the violation of his rights.
fusion of different types of governmental
√ That part of the law which governs the
powers in certain public officers which are
organization, functions, and procedures of
part of the executive branch of the
administrative agencies of the government to
government
which quasi legislative powers are delegated and
quasi judicial powers are granted, and the extent
Distinguished from international law
and manner to which such agencies are subject to
control by the courts. Administrative law International law
Lays down the rules Not binding upon the
Public law Private law which shall guide the officers of any
officers of the government considered
That branch of law which Rules which regulate the
administration in their in relation to their own
regulates the relations of relations of individuals
actions as agents of the government
the State with its with one another,
government
subjects without regard to their
Ex: It has been adopted
relation to their
into the administrative
government
law of the state
Scope of administrative law
Distinguished from constitutional law
1. The law which fixes the administrative organization
and structure of the government Administrative law Constitutional law
2. The law, the execution or enforcement of which is Gives and carries out the Prescribes the general
entrusted to administrative authorities general plan in its plan or framework of
3. The law which governs public officers including minutest details governmental
their competence to act, rights, duties, liabilities, organization
election, etc. Treats the rights of the Treats of the rights of
4. The law which creates administrative agencies, individual from the the individual
defines their powers and functions, prescribes their standpoint of the powers
procedures, including the adjudication or of the government
settlement by them of contested matters involving Emphasizes the powers Lays stress upon rights
private rights of government and
5. The law which provides the remedies available to duties of the citizens
those aggrieved by administrative actions or Indicates to individuals Prescribes the limitations
decisions remedies for the on the powers of the
6. The law which governs judicial review of, or relief violation of their rights government to protect
against, administrative actions or decisions the rights of individuals
7. The rules, regulations, orders, and decisions
(including presidential proclamations) made by
administrative authorities dealing with the Distinguished from criminal law
interpretation and enforcement of the laws Administrative law Criminal law
entrusted to their administration A rule of law protected Consists of body of penal
8. The body of judicial decisions and doctrines dealing or enforced by a penal sanctions which are
with any of the above sanction may be really applied to all branches of
administrative in law, including
Note: Administrative law embraces not only the law that character. The mere administrative law
governs administrative authorities that construe and apply affixing of a penalty to
them, but also the law made by administrative authorities. the violation of a rule of
administrative law does
“Administrative authorities” -> all those public officers and not deprive such rule of
administrative agencies of the government but DO NOT its administrative
include Congress and the regular courts character
As to its source 2. The law made by Note: It must be stressed that “made” law is law only
administrative because some statute or constitutional provisions so
authorities prescribe. No agency can “make” law without thereby
It includes both “applying” the enabling act which authorizes agency action.
general In the hierarchy of norms, the regulation stands one step
regulations and below the enabling statute, which, in turn, ranks below the
2. Lack of legal knowledge and aptitude in sound merely dependent on the government officers as
judicial technique solution of the question to the applicability in the
3. Susceptibility of political bias or pressure, often “what is the law” but cases in question of a
brought by uncertainty of tenure made also as a result of particular rule of law
4. A disregard for the safeguards that insure a full consideration of
and fair hearing expediency
5. Absence of standard rules of procedure suitable to What is the law in order What law is applicable to
the activities of each agency to determine whether the facts brought before
6. A dangerous combination of legislative, executive, administrative officers them
and judicial functions are competent to act,
but furthermore, they
Relations between administrative agencies and courts must decide whether in
1. Collaborative instrumentalities case they are competent
Collaboration of judicial power and to act, it is wise for them
function with the administrative process is to act
a necessary part of today’s legal system,
and the appropriate independence of each Administration as a separate power
should be respected by the other. In the traditional classification of governmental
In effecting the collaboration of courts and power, no recognition is given to administration as
agencies, courts may entertain action a separate function of government.
brought before them, but call to their aid
the appropriate administrative agency on As a function As an organization
questions within its administrative “Administration” is “Administration” is
competence the execution, in spoken of
non-judicial matters, accompanied by the
2. Role of courts of the law or will of definite article “the.”
a. To accommodate the administrative the State as “The administration”
process to the traditional judicial system expressed by the -> most important
b. To accommodate private rights and the competent authority administrative
public interest in the powers reposed in Administration is the authorities
administrative agencies activity of the It is that group or
c. To reconcile in the field of administrative executive officers of aggregate of
action, democratic safeguards and the government persons in whose
standards of fair play with effective Executive action hands the reins of
conduct of government Administration had the government are
to do with the for the time being
3. Discharge of judicial role carrying of laws into
a. To maintain the Constitution by seeing effect
that powers are not unlawfully vested in As a function,
administrative agencies administration may
b. To give due deference to the role of the be internal or
administrative agencies and not interfere external
with the proper exercise of their valid Administration is both the function of execution of
powers the law (or management of government affairs) and
c. To lend the powers of the court to the the totality of the executive and administrative
proper attainment of the valid objectives authorities
of the administrative agency
d. To leave the legislature or the people the Administration as an organization distinguished from
remedy for administrative action, which government
may be unwise or undesirable but is Administration Government
within the lawful powers of the agency.
Refers to the aggregate Aggregate of authorities
of those persons in which rule a society
Note: √ The courts are NOT advisers of administrative
whose hands the reins of
agencies.
government are
entrusted by the people
Administration of government distinguished from
for the time being
administration of justice
Administrative officers Judicial officers
Those charged with Those charged with
administration of administration of justice CHAPTER II
government NATURE AND ORGANIZATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE
The work done by the The work done by AGENCIES
administrative officers is judicial officers consists
not necessarily or even in the decision of
often the result of any controversies between A. Statutes and Characteristics
controversy and is not individuals and
for the public (e.g., Phil. National Railways, NHA, Civil Service Commission Commission
NFA) Commission on Elections on Audit
4. Those set up to function in situations wherein the Other special bodies: Office of the Ombudsman,
government is seeking to regulate businesses Commission on Human Rights, central monetary
affected with public interest (e.g., Energy authority, national police commission, independent
Regulatory Board, LTFRB, NTC) economic and planning agency (NEDA)
5. Those set up to function in situations wherein the
government is seeking under their police power to Doctrine of political agency
regulate private businesses and individuals (e.g., Recognizes the establishment of a single executive, all
SEC, MTRCB) executive and administrative organizations are adjuncts of
6. Those agencies set up to function in situations the Executive Department, and except in cases where the
wherein the government is seeking to adjust Chief Executive is required by the Constitution or law to act
individual controversies because of some strong in person, the multifarious executive and administrative
social policy involved (e.g., NLRC, SEC, DAR) functions of the Chief Executive are performed by and
through the executive departments, and the acts of the
Note: An administrative agency may fall under more than Secretaries of such departments are, unless disapproved or
one type reprobated by the Chief Executive, presumptively the acts
of the Chief Executive.
2. Department proper
2.
Provide service to
Organization of Field Offices people in area
Functions of a 3. Coordinate with
Regional Offices Regional Office regional offices of
They shall be established according to law other departments,
defining field service areas. bureaus, and
Provincial and district offices may be agencies in the area
established only by law whenever necessary 4. Coordinate with
Regional Director LGUs in the area
who may be 5. Perform other
assisted by 1 functions
Assistant Regional Note: District offices may be established only in
Director cases of clear necessity
Administration The Regional
Director shall be Definition of administrative relationship
responsible for 1. Supervision and control
department or a. Act directly whenever a specific function is
agency functions entrusted by law or regulation to a
performed in the subordinate
region under his b. Direct the performance of a duty and
jurisdiction restrain the commission of acts
Whenever the c. Review, approve, reverse, or modify acts
function or activity and decisions of subordinate officials or
of a department or units
agency requires d. Determine priorities in the execution of
central or inter- plans and programs
Supervision regional action, the e. Prescribe standards, guidelines, plans, and
function may be programs
performed by the
regional offices
under the
supervision and 2. Administrative supervision
control of the a. It shall govern the administrative
department proper relationship between a department or its
or line bureau equivalent and regulatory agency or other
concerned agencies
Staff bureau or i. To generally oversee operations of
division shall such agencies
perform primarily ii. To require the submission of
advisory or auxiliary reports and cause conduct of
functions and management audit
exercise in behalf of iii. To take such action for the proper
the department or performance of official functions
agency functional including rectification of violations
supervision over the iv. To review and pass upon budget
regional offices proposals but may not add to them
i. Having the department Note: The Secretary’s authority shall not apply to chartered
represented in the governing institutions or GOCCs attached to the department
board of the attached agency or
corporation, either as chairman or Delegation of authority
as a member, with or without 1. Delegated authority shall be to the extent
rights, if this is permitted by the necessary for the effective implementation of
charter programs
ii. Having the attached corporation or 2. The delegation shall be in writing.
agency comply with a system of
periodic reporting Line bureau authority
iii. Having the department or its 1. Line bureaus shall exercise supervision and control
equivalent provide general policies over regional and field offices
through its representative board 2. The regional and other field offices shall constitute
the operating arms of the bureau concerned for the
b. Matters of day-to-day administration or all direct implementations of the programs
those pertaining to internal operations
shall be left to the discretion of the Relationship of government-owned or –controlled
executive officer of the agency or corporations to the Department
corporation
c. Government owned or controlled GOCCs
corporations attached to a department Any agency organized as a stock or non-stock
shall submit to the Secretary concerned corporation, vested with functions relating to public
their audited financial statements within needs whether governmental or proprietary in
60 days after the close of the fiscal year. nature, and owned by the government wholly or,
d. Pending submission of the required where applicable as in the case of stock
financial statements, the corporation shall corporations, to the extent of at least 50% capital
continue to operate on the basis of the stock.
preceding year’s budget until the financial They shall be attached to the appropriate
statements shall have been submitted. department with which they have allied functions
At least 1/3 of the members of the Boards of such
Powers and functions of the Department Secretary corporations should either be a Secretary or
1. Advise the President in issuing executive orders Undersecretary, or Assistant Secretary
and other issuances
2. Establish policies and standards for the operation Note: During their tenure, the President, VP, members of
of the department the cabinet, and their deputies and assistants (i.e.,
3. Promulgate rules and regulations undersecretaries and assistant secretaries) are prohibited,
4. Promulgate administrative issuances. These unless otherwise provided in the Constitution itself, from
issuances shall not prescribe penalties for their holding any other office or employment.
violation, except when expressly authorized by law
5. Exercise disciplinary powers over officers and Relationship of regulatory agencies to the
employees including their investigation and the Department
designation of a committee or officer to conduct
such investigation Regulatory agency
6. Appoint all officers and employees of the Refers to any agency expressly vested with jurisdiction to
Department except those whose appointments are regulate, administer, or adjudicate matters affecting
vested in the President or in some other appointing substantial rights and interest of private persons
authority. 1. It shall be subject to the administrative supervision
7. Exercise jurisdiction over all bureaus, offices, of the department under which they are placed
agencies and corporations under the Department 2. The heads of regulatory agencies shall submit
8. Delegate authority to officers annually their budgets and work plans which shall
9. Perform other functions be the basis of their day to day operations
3. The regulatory agencies may avail themselves of
Authority of Department Secretary the common auxiliary and management services of
Shall have supervision and control over all bureaus, offices, the department
and agencies under him, subject to the following guidelines:
1. Initiative of freedom of action on the part of Mandates of the different Departments
subordinate units shall be encouraged Department Subject
2. With respect to functions involving discretion or Department of Foreign Field of foreign relations
expertise vested by the law upon a subordinate Affairs
agency, control shall be exercised in accordance Department of Fiscal policies
with said law Finance
3. With respect to any regulatory function of an Department of Justice Law agency as counsel
agency subject to department control, the and prosecution arm
authority of the department shall be governed by
Agricultural
the provisions of the Code.
development
3. Quasi-judicial powers
Unless expressly empowered,
administrative agencies are bereft of quasi-
judicial powers.
The jurisdiction of administrative authorities
is dependent entirely upon the provisions of
the statute reposing the power in them;
they cannot confer it upon themselves.
That the exercise of power will most the Decree. Rather, it merely provides for the withdrawal of
effectively prevent or stop specific the State’s waiver of its right to punish said colorum
violations of law is no excuse for a deviation operators for their illegal acts. In other words, the cited
from this rule. section declares when the period of moratorium suspending
Administrative agencies are tribunals of the relentless drive to eliminate illegal operators shall end.
limited jurisdiction and as such can exercise It is a settled principle of law that in determining whether a
only those powers which are specifically board or commission has a certain power, the authority
granted to them by their enabling statutes given should be liberally construed in the light of the
Administrative agencies have in their favor purposes for which it was created and that which is
the presumption that they have regularly incidentally necessary to a full implementation of the
performed their official functions legislative intent should be upheld as being germane to the
law. Necessarily, too, where the end is required, the
Illustrative Cases appropriate means are deemed given.
Makati Stock Exchange, Inc. v. SEC (14 SCRA 620 Nature of powers
[1965]) 1. Jurisdiction limited
Facts: SEC prohibits double listing of stock securities in In general, the jurisdiction of
stock exchanges. The SEC in its resolution, denied the administrative officers and agencies is
Makati Stock Exchange permission to operate a stock special and limited
exchange unless it agreed not to list for trading on its They possess only such powers and
board, securities, already listed in the Manila Stock authority as have been specifically
Exchange. Makati Stock Exchange contends that the conferred upon them and those as may be
Commission has no power to impose it. necessarily implied in the exercise thereof
2. Powers within their jurisdiction broad
Held: The test is not whether the Act forbids the The powers conferred on them must be
Commission from imposing a prohibition but whether it commensurate with the duties to be
empowers the Commission to prohibit (Test for determining performed and the purposes to be lawfully
existence of authority). The Commission possesses no effected
power to impose the condition of the rule which results in Powers of particular administrative bodies
discrimination and violation of constitutional rights. have been held broad and plenary within
their fields
Radio Communications of the Phil., Inc., v. Board of Persons dealing with administrative
Communications (80 SCRA 471 [1977]) officers or agencies must take notice of
Facts: Board of Communications imposed fine for injury their authority to act, and are charged
caused by failure of communications company to transmit with knowledge of any and all limitations
telegrams. Two complaints were filed against RCPI with the on their power.
Board of Communications for damages for failure of
complainant to receive a telegram sent to them informing
him of the death of his wife, and the other complainant, of 3. Powers subject to the Constitution, applicable
the death of his father. The Board, after hearing, imposed a law, or administrative regulation
disciplinary fine against RCPI. As successor-in-interest of A government agency must respect the
the Public Service Commission, the Board of presumption of constitutionality and
Communications exercises the same powers, jurisdiction, legality to which statutes and
and functions as those provided for in the Public Service Act administrative regulations are entitled
for the Public Service Commission, one of which is to issue until such statute or regulation is repealed
certificates of public convenience. or amended, or until set aside in an
appropriate case by a competent court,
Held: (Board without jurisdiction over the cases). and ultimately by the SC.
Administrative agencies only exercise such powers as are It is not authorized to substitute its own
expressly or by necessary implication conferred on them by judgment for any applicable law or
law. They can only adjudicate matters coming within their administrative regulation, at least not
jurisdiction. The charge does not relate to the management before such law or regulation is set aside
of the facilities and system of transmission of message by by the authorized agency of the
petitioner in accordance with its certificate of public government.
convenience. The proper forum for them to ventilate their
grievances for possible recovery of damages against
petitioner should be in the courts and not in the respondent
Board of Communications. What constitutes administrative power or
administrative function
Matienzo v. Abellera (162 SCRA 11 [1988])
Facts: The Board of Transportation (BOT) granted Administrative power/Administrative function
provisional permits for the operation of “excess taxicab It is of indefinite connotation embracing in a loose
units” allegedly “despite the lapse of its power to do so sense some legislative, executive, and judicial
under the law. prerogatives.
Held: There is nothing in Section 4 to suggest the
expiration of such powers six months after promulgation of
An administrative body, however, cannot book of accounts and other records open to inspection by
exercise its power to punish a person for the members. The petitioners refused.
contempt, in the absence of any statutory Held: The controlling provisions of law may be found in
grant, for such power is inherently judicial Section 17 of the Industrial Peace Act which provides that
in nature. “The members shall be entitled to full and detailed reports
from their officers and representatives of all financial
Carmelo v. Ramos 6 SCRA 836 (1962) transactions… the books of accounts and other records of
Facts: (Committee created by executive order of Mayor of the financial activities of a legitimate labor organization
Manila to investigate anomalies issued subpoenas and shall be open to inspection by any officer or member
demanded that witnesses testify under oath). The Mayor of thereof.” The matter involved demanded exercise by the
Manila issued an executive order a committee to investigate Court of its power of investigation. The matter was deemed
anomalies involving the license inspectors of the office of serious enough by he prosecutor or respondent Court to call
the mayor. He named C as chairman of the committee. It for the exercise of the statutory power of investigation to
appears that the committee issued subpoena to R, a private substantiate the alleged violation so as to assure that the
citizen working as a bookkeeper requiring him to appear in rights and conditions of membership set forth in Section 17
connection with an administrative case but R, on whom the be respected. It cannot be said that such requirement is
subpoenas were duly served, refused to appear. Petitioner C beyond the statutory power conferred. Authority conferred
filed in the CFI of Manila a petition to declare R in contempt. intended to protect the rights of union members. The power
Held: Committee without authority to issue subpoena. The to investigate requires inquiry into existing facts and
delegation by the Mayor of the power to investigate does conditions. It is not for this Court to whittle down the
not imply also the delegation of the power to take testimony authority conferred on administrative agencies to assure the
or evidence of witness whose appearance may be required effective administration of a statute, in this case intended to
by the compulsory process of subpoena. There is no protect the rights of Union members against its officers.
statutory. Mayor has no power to delegate the authority to
committee. Right to counsel in administrative investigations
1. Hearing not part of criminal prosecution
Evangelista v. Jarencio 69 SCRA 99 (1975) A party in an administrative inquiry may
Facts: (Respondent questioned legality of subpoena issued or may not be assisted by counsel,
by an administrative agency charged with the function, irrespective of the nature of the charges
among others, to investigate graft and corruption, where and of the respondent’s capacity to
there was no charge of complaint of violation of law then represent himself
pending). E is head of the PARGO created by EO 4, which No duty rests on such body to furnish the
provides that “the agency is hereby vested with all the person being investigated with counsel.
powers of an investigating committee… including the power In an administrative proceeding, a
to summon witnesses by subpoena duces tecum, administer respondent has the option of engaging the
oaths, take testimony or evidence relevant to the services of counsel or not. This is clear
investigation.” M was issued by a subpoena ad from the Civil Service Act and the
testificandum commanding him to appear as a witness at Administrative Code of 1987,
the office of PARGO to testify. Instead of obeying it, he filed The right to counsel is not always
a petition with the CFI assailing its legality. imperative in administrative investigations
Held: Agency with authority to enforce subpoenas issued. because such inquiries are conducted
Administrative agencies may enforce subpoenas issued in merely to determine whether there are
the course of investigations, whether or not adjudication is facts that merit disciplinary measure
involved, and whether or not probable cause is shown and against erring public officers and
even before the issuance of a complaint. It is enough that employees.
the investigation be for a lawfully authorized purpose. The hearing conducted by the
Authority delegated by statute. When investigative and investigating authority is NOT part of a
accusatory duties are delegated by statute to an criminal prosecution.
administrative body, it too may take steps to inform itself as 2. Exclusionary rule in custodial investigation
to whether there is probable violation of the law. In sum, it not applicable
may be stated that subpoena meets the requirements for The right to counsel attaches only upon
enforcement if the inquiry is: (1) within the authority of the the start of such custodial investigation.
agency, (2) the demand is not too indefinite, and (3) the Therefore, the exclusionary rule under the
information is reasonably relevant. The information sought Bill of Rights applies only to admissions
is reasonably relevant to the investigation. made in a criminal investigation but not to
those made in an administrative
Catura v. CIR 37 SCRA 303 (1971) investigation.
Facts: (Officer of labor union charged with unauthorized
disbursement of union funds refused to deliver an deposit Importance of administrative investigations
certain documents in connection with the court’s The lifeblood of administrative process is the flow
investigation of the charge). A complaint was filed by the of fact, the gathering, the organization, and the
Prosecution Division of the CIR against officers of a labor analysis of evidence.
organization charging them with unauthorized disbursement Investigations are useful not only for rule-making,
of union funds and demanding from them a full detail adjudication, and licensing, but also for
report of all financial transactions of the Union and to make prosecuting, for supervising and directing, for
determining general policy, and for recommending Binding on the agency and all those dealing with
legislation. the agency
1. Nature
Note: An administrative agency may act in both a legislative
Quasi-legislative - with power to make law
and a judicial capacity. It may decide matters of policy or
Essential legislative functions may not be delegated
determine a rule for future action as well as dispose of a
to administrative agencies, and in this sense,
particular controversy.
administrative agencies have no legislative power
Kinds of rule-making powers/rules and regulations
2. Necessity
1. Rule-making powers
Impracticability of the law-makers to provide
Supplementary or Rule-making by reason
general regulations
detailed legislation of particular delegation
Specialization in legislation has become necessary
of authority
Administrative bodies may implement broad
policies laid down in the statute by “filling in” Rule-making by the
Interpretative construction and
details which the legislative may neither have nor
competence to provide legislation interpretation of a
statute being
3. Conditions administered
The statutory grant of rule-making power to Contingent Legislation Under delegated power,
administrative agencies is a valid exception to the or determination whether a statute shall
rule on non-delegation of legislative power, go into effect
provided two conditions concur: 2. Administrative rules
4. The statute is complete in itself – setting (1) Discretionary or legislative
forth policy to be executed by the agency (2) Interpretative
5. Said statute fixes a standard – mapping (3) Contingent
out the boundaries of the agency’s (4) Procedural
authority to which it must conform (5) Internal – issued by administrative superior
to his subordinates
4. Binding force and effect (6) Penal – those which prescribe criminal
Has the force and effect of a law sanctions
administrative agency so important and Consistency with law and the Constitution
unavoidable. 1. Administrative rules and regulations must be within
the scope and purview of the statutory authority
Special advantages of the rule-making power granted by the legislature to the administrative
1. Freed from concern with details, the legislature can agency.
concentrate its attention upon the enactment of 2. They must be confined to details for regulating the
the fundamentals of policy, and is thus mode of proceeding to carry into effect the law as
strengthened as the representative organ of it has been enacted.
government.
2. The legislature also has additional time to Tests applied in determining validity of rules.
investigate the manner in which administrative
authorities have concretized and enforced its Determination of validity of rules: Questions to be
policies asked in determining the validity of the agency rule
3. Since rules are more easily amended than statutes, Legislative rule Interpretative rule
it becomes easier to correct mistakes and to meet 1. Whether the rule 1. Whether the rule
changing conditions, if the difficulty concerns relates to the correctly interprets
details rather than basic policy. subject matter on the statute
4. The administrator does not have to choose which power to 2. Whether the rule
between defeating the central purpose of the legislate has been amounts to an
statute by trying to work the unworkable, and delegated attempt to exercise
evading the letter of the law 2. Whether the rule legislative powers
5. The administrator is the one who can, by trial and conforms to the which have not been
error, work out the specific regulations best standards prescribed delegated
calculated to attain the statutory objective. in the delegatory
6. In working out specifics of policy, a bureaucracy is, statute
ideally, subject to political responsibility with 3. Whether the rule is
respect to discretionary matters, and to invalid on
professional responsibility with respect to technical constitutional
matters. grounds, such as
7. If discretion in particular cases is untrammeled, it due process
is more liable to abuse than if statutory generalities
are made more specific and concrete before they Tests applied in determining validity of rules
are applied to individual situations 1. A rule is invalid if it exceeds the authority
8. Interpretative regulations are a means of conferred to it
increasing the certainty of the law
9. Contingent legislation furnishes a means by which 2. A rule is invalid if it conflicts with the
a policy can be blocked out by the legislature, and governing statute
its coming into operation be made dependent upon Example: where a procedural rule
unpredictable future contingencies, such as the attempts to limit a right of appeal granted
action of a foreign government. by a statute, it is void because it in effect
conflicts with the statute
Requisites for validity of administrative rules and Example: where an interpretative rule is
regulations in conflict with the court’s interpretation of
1. The rules and regulations must have been issued the statute, the conclusion of invalidity is
on the authority of law premised on the agency’s interpretation
2. They must not be contrary to law and the as being in conflict with the statute
Constitution
Note: In certain cases, previous notice and hearing or 3. A rule is void if it extends or modifies the
publication may be necessary to satisfy the requirement of statute
due process. √ Example: a civil service rule prohibiting
57-year old persons from employment,
Grant of rule-making powers reinstatement, or re-employment in the
1. By some legislative act -> there must be a law government service because it has no
authorizing administrative bodies to make rules basis in the law itself [Toledo v. CSC, 202
and regulations SCRA 507 (1991)].
Without such authority, an administrative √ Example: A civil service memorandum
rule and regulation is null and void circular limiting to only 1 year extension
2. By implication from the powers expressly granted - service of an employee who has reached
> Does not depend for its existence solely upon the compulsory age of 65 without having
express grant. The authority may be implied from completed 15 years of service because it
the power granted. has no relation or connection with any
An agency may, without specific statutory provision of the law supposed to be
authority, make known its interpretation carried into effect for there is nothing in
of the provision of the statute it the law which would serve as the basis for
administers providing the allowable extension period
to only 1 year instead of such period to
complete the 15 year service requirement Philippine Islands. Neither the CIR nor the legislature itself
to be entitled to the age-old pension has any power to discriminate in favor of one province
benefits under the law. The rule is an against another in the production of tobacco or of any other
addition to or an extension of the law, not product of the Islands.
merely a mode of carrying it into effect
[Cena v. CSC, 211 SCRA 179 (1992)] Young v. Rafferty 33 Phil. 276 (1916)
Facts: (Circular letter requires books of account to be kept
4. A rule is void if it has no reasonable in English or Spanish). The Internal Revenue Act authorizes
relationship to the statutory purpose the Collector of Internal Revenue to specify the manner in
Seems unrelated to the policy of the which the proper books of accounts shall be kept. Pursuant
statute, but neither direct conflict with the thereto, the Collector of Internal Revenue issued a circular
statute nor any clear extension of the requiring every merchant and manufacturer to keep a
statutory command can be shown record of his daily sales either in English or in Spanish
If the challenged rule produces language, and providing that any violation of the circular
burdensome and inequitable results, it will be subject the offender to prosecution under the Act.
may be set aside bearing no relationship Held: The keeping of books in any particular language not
to the purpose of the governing statute required by law. The law does not provide nor require that
the books be kept in any particular language.
5. Courts will set aside rules deemed to be
unconstitutional or arbitrary or unreasonable. Sy Man v. Fabros 93 Phil. 1093 (1913)
Rule is invalid if it goes beyond what the Facts: (Memorandum Order of Commissioner of Customs
legislature could authorize requires review by him even of unappealed cases of the
Collector of Customs in seizure cases). A memorandum
Note: Every party subject to administrative regulation order of the Commissioner of Customs provides that, as in
deserves an opportunity to know, through reasonable protest cases, decisions of the Collector of Customs in
regulations promulgated by the agency, of the objective seizure cases, whether appealed or not, are subject to
standards that have to be met. Such rule is integral to due review by the Insular Collector (now Commissioner), and
process, as it protects substantive rights. that pending action by him on such decisions, final disposal
of the goods involved shall not be made. Under the Tariff
Manuel v. General Auditing Office 42 SCRA 660 and Customs Code, if the person aggrieved by the decision
(1976) of the Collector of Customs in any matter (including seizure
Facts: The General Auditing Office, relying on a rule of the cases) does not make an appeal within 15 days after
Civil Service Commission, denied claims of retiree for notification, the decision becomes final as to him.
commutation of his vacation and sick leaves). M applied for Held: No law gives authority to the Commissioner of
retirement and sought commutation of the money value of Customs to review and revise unappealed decisions in
his vacation and sick leaves. The General Auditing Office seizure cases. There is no law giving authority to the
(now COA) ruled that M’s application could not be allowed in Commissioner of Customs to review and revise unappealed
audit. The Revised Administrative Code provides that decision in seizure cases. The logical inference from Section
vacation and sick leaves shall be cumulative, while the Civil 1393 is that the lawmakers did not deem it necessary or
Service Rule provides that leave is not cumulative. advisable to provide for supervisory authority or power of
Held: Administrative rules are binding on courts when valid, revision by the Commissioner and the Department Head in
even when courts are not in agreement with the policy seizure cases. Decisions not appealed within reglementary
stated therein. On the other hand, administrative period become final.
interpretation of the law is at best merely advisory, for it is
the courts that finally what the law means. No lesser Inter-provincial Auto Bus Co. v. CIR 98 Phil. 290
administrative executive office or agency can assert for (1956)
itself a more extensive prerogative. There must be strict Facts: Petitioner is a common carrier engaged in
compliance with the legislative enactment. Its terms must transporting passengers and freight receipts that have been
be followed. issued by the petitioner. He found that some of the stubs
were not preserved for during a period, although the
√ Olsen and Co., Inc. v. Aldanese, 43 Phil. 259 (1922) conductors’ daily reports revealed to him the number of
Facts: (Rule defining proper standard of the quality of receipts for the period. Both the available stubs and the
tobacco limits its application to certain provinces. Act No. daily reports did not state the value of the goods
2613 authorizes the Collector of Internal Revenue to transported thereunder. Pursuant to a regulation issued by
promulgate rules and regulations for the classification, the Department of Finance, petitioner was assessed
marking, and packing of tobacco as may be necessary to documentary stamp tax. The regulation provides that unless
secure leaf tobacco of good quality. Pursuant to said Act, the bill of lading states that the goods are worth P5.00 or
the CIR issued AO 35 which provides that “to be classified less, the value shall be assumed to be more than P5.00 for
as standard, cigar must be manufactured… exclusively the purposes of documentary stamps tax payable.
product of the provinces of Cagayan, Isabela, and Nueva Held: Regulation merely a directive to tax officers, not
Vizcaya…” creating liability. The practical usefulness of the directive
Held: Rules and regulations beyond the scope of enabling becomes evident when account is taken of the fact that tax
Act are void. The rules in question amount to discrimination officers are in no position to witness the issuance of receipts
and class legislation, which even the Legislature would not and check the value of the goods for which they are issued.
have the power to enact. The Act does not provide the limit Regulation is useful, necessary, and practical, and also
as to the place where the tobacco should be grown in the reasonable.
Administrative agency is not bound by the rule of should not be made subservient to the internal office
res judicata procedure of an administrative body. No justifiable reason
In the case of procedural rules, it is often was shown for a relaxation of the rules. The “win-win”
expeditious for an agency to ignore a certain rule resolution was in arrant violation of the fundamental and
in a particular case and adopt therein a different time-honored principle of finality to administrative
procedure than that contemplated by the agency’s determinations.
rule Separate Opinion (Puno, J.): Suspension of the rules lies
An agency will not be permitted to adopt a special in that authority that promulgated them. It is the President
rule of procedure for the purpose of affecting the as administrative head who is vested by the Administrative
outcome of a particular case Code of 1987 to promulgate rules relating to governmental
operations, including administrative procedure. These rules
√ Hilado v. CIR 100 Phil. 288 (1956) take the form of administrative orders. The President has
Facts: (Secretary of Finance revoked a general circular the power to suspend the effectivity of administrative rules
pursuant to which a taxpayer claimed deductions from his of procedure. There is no reason to withhold the power to
gross income). H filed his income tax return wherein he suspend rules from the President and grant it alone to the
claimed an amount as deductible from his gross income two other branches of government. The suspension by the
pursuant to a circular issued by the CIR. This circular was President of AO 18 was not whimsical. The President also
issued pursuant to certain rules laid down by the Secretary clearly exercised his control power over an alter ego under
of Finance. The new Secretary of Finance, however, through the principles of presidential power of control and qualified
CIR, issued a circular which revoked the previous circular. political agency.
Held: The Secretary of Finance is vested with authority to
revoke, repeal, or abrogate the acts or previous rulings of Formal requirements on the promulgation, etc., of
his predecessors in office because the construction of a rules and regulations.
statute by those administering it is not binding on their Pursuant to the Administrative Code of 1987:
successors if thereafter the latter becomes satisfied that a 1. Every agency shall file with the UP Law Center
different construction should be given. No vested right is three certified copies of every rule adopted by it.
acquired from an erroneous construction of a law. a 2. A permanent register of all rules shall be kept by
regulation that is merely an interpretation of a statute when the issuing agency and shall be open to public
once determined to have been erroneous becomes a nullity. inspection
3. Each rule shall become effective 15 days from the
√ Ollada v. Secretary of Finance 109 Phil. 1072 date of filing unless a different date is fixed by law.
(1960) 4. The UP Law Center shall publish a monthly bulletin
Facts: Secretary of Finance expressly authorized the non- setting forth the text of rules filed with it during
retroactivity of regulation which amended a previous one. the preceding quarter
Held: Resolution was not unreasonable or arbitrary. Surely, 5. The UP Law Center shall keep an up to date
no one is better qualified to interpret the intent behind codification of rules
these revenue regulations than the authority that issued 6. The UP Law Center may omit from the bulletin or
them. The regulations issued by the Secretary of Finance codification of any rule if its publication would be
are subject to amendment or revocation by his successor. unduly cumbersome or expensive. Bulletin shall
The Secretary, may, at any time, amend or revoke any of contain a notice stating the general subject matter
the regulations issued by him so long as it is in consonance of the omitted rule.
with the statute. The Secretary, under the law, may, 7. Every rule establishing an offense or defining an
therefore, change or repeal any of the regulations issued by act which, pursuant to law, is punishable as a
him as he may see fit. crime or subject to a penalty shall in all case be
published in full text.
√ Fortich v. Corona 298 SCRA 685 (1998) 8. The UP Law Center shall distribute the bulletin and
Facts: (The Office of the President modified its decision codified rules to OP, Congress, appellate courts,
which had already become final and executory). DAR filed and National Library.
its motion for reconsideration of the OP decision beyond the 9. The courts shall take judicial notice of the certified
reglementary period. DAR again filed a second motion for copy of each rule duly filed or as published in the
reconsideration, which was prohibited by the rules and bulletin or the codified rules.
despite the OP decision being declared final and executory. 10. If not otherwise required by law, an agency shall
The second motion for reconsideration was entertained by publish or circulate notices of proposed rules and
Deputy Executive Secretary and on the basis thereof, issued afford interested parties the opportunity to submit
a “win-win” resolution substantially modifying the OP their views prior to the adoption of any rule.
decision that had become final and executory. DAR 11. In the fixing of rates, no rule or final order shall be
contends that its procedure made it impossible for them to valid unless the proposed rates shall have been
file the motion for reconsideration on time, since said published in a newspaper of general circulation at
decision had to be referred to different departments of the least 2 weeks before the first hearing thereon.
DAR.
Held: The late filing of the DAR of its motion for Requirements of notice and hearing or publication.
reconsideration is not excusable. DAR must not disregard Prior notice and hearing are not required since
the reglementary period fixed by law, rule, or regulation. there is no determination of past events or facts
DAR must develop a system of procedure that would enable that have to be established or ascertained
it to comply with the reglementary period for filing the said
motion. For, the rules relating to reglementary period
Prior notice and hearing are not essential to the Eastern Shipping Lines v. CA 291 SCRA 485 (1998)
validity of rules and regulations promulgated to Facts: Respondent filed a complaint against petitioner for
govern future conduct. non-payment of pilotage services. Petitioner assails EO
1088 providing for uniform and modified rates for pilotage
1. Where rules do not apply to named or services upon which respondent basis its claim, for the
specified parties reason that EO 1088 constitutes undue delegation of
Where a function, legislative in nature, legislative powers. Petitioner insists that it should pay
rather than a judicial function, is pilotage fees in accordance with the memorandum circulars
delegated to an administrative agency, issued by the PPA, the administrative body vested with the
the legislature need not require a notice power to regulate and prescribe pilotage fees.
or hearing as a prerequisite to the act of Held: EO 1088 is valid. PPA circulars are inconsistent with
the administrative agency, since the EO 1088. Administrative or executive acts, orders, and
legislature could itself have performed regulations shall be valid only when they are not contrary to
that act without notice or hearing, the laws or the Constitution. The conclusive effect of
particularly where the rules are of a administrative construction is not absolute. Action of an
general application, or procedural in administrative agency may be disturbed or set aside by the
nature, or are no more than judicial department if there is an error of law, a grave abuse
administrative interpretation. of power, or lack of jurisdiction, or grave abuse of discretion
2. Where rules apply to named or specified clearly conflicting with either the letter or spirit of the law. it
parties is axiomatic that an administrative agency has no discretion
Where such rules apply exclusively to a whether to implement the law or not. Its duty is to enforce
particular party and are predicated upon it.
a finding of fact, the agency in making
such finding of fact performs a function D. Adjudicatory Powers
partaking of a quasi-judicial character,
the valid exercise of which demands a Generally.
previous notice and hearing to satisfy the 1. Involve specific parties
requirement of due process. Involves determination of the rights,
3. Where requirements prescribed by law duties, and obligations of specific
Under the Administrative Code of 1987, individuals as contrasted with rule-making
notices of proposed rules must be given powers which involve persons generally
when required by law, otherwise such and operate prospectively.
notices shall be circulated as far as 2. Involve judicial function exercised by a
practicable to afford interested parties person other than a judge
the opportunity to submit their views “Quasi-judicial” and “adjudicatory” are
prior to the adoption of any rule. synonymous or correlative, but not all
4. Where rules have the force and effect of law. determinations by an administrative
Issuances by an administrative agency to agency are judicial in nature or quasi-
enforce or implement an existing law judicial.
have the force and effect of law. Where a power rests in judgment or
Publication is required as a condition discretion, so that it is of judicial nature of
precedent to the effectivity of a law to character, but does not involve the
inform the public of the contents of the exercise of functions of a judge, or is
law or rules and regulations before their conferred upon an officer other than a
rights and interests are affected by the judicial officer, it is deemed quasi-judicial.
same. Quasi-judicial function is a term which
Subsequent publication thereof will not applies to the actions of public
cure the defect. administrative officers or bodies that are
Prior publication cannot be dispensed required to investigate facts, or ascertain
with for the reason that such omission the existence of facts, hold hearings, and
would offend due process insofar as it draw conclusions from them, as a basis
would deny the public knowledge of the for their official action and to exercise
laws that are supposed to govern it. discretion of a judicial nature.
The publication must be full or it is no 3. Involve exercise of judicial power
publication at all since its purpose is to conveniently styled “quasi-judicial”
inform the public of the contents thereof. The use of such terms is simply a
5. Where regulations merely interpretative and convenient way of approving the exercise
those internal in nature of a judicial power by an administrative
Interpretative regulations and those agency.
merely internal in nature, that is, The terms used to designate the character
regulating only the personnel of the of particular proceedings or powers, the
administrative agency and not the public, exercise of which must be accompanied
need not be published. with certain formalities and safeguards
characteristics of the judicial process.
Administrative agencies are not
considered courts. They are neither part
of the judicial system nor are they Except for constitutional officials who can
deemed judicial tribunals. trace their competence to act to the
fundamental law itself, a public official
Distinguished from judicial power. must locate in the statute relied upon a
Judicial power grant of power before he can exercise it.
Power to hear, try, and determine all sorts of cases 5. General policy to uphold exercise
at law and equity which are brought before the It is the general policy of the courts to
courts sustain the decision of administrative
Power and authority to make a final, rather than an authorities not only on the basis of the
initial determination of what the law is and doctrine of separation of powers but also
adjudicate the respective rights of the contending for their presumed knowledgeability.
parties. A court cannot compel an agency to do a
particular act or to enjoin such an act
1. Where function primarily administrative which is within the latter’s prerogative
Where the function of an agency is except when in the exercise of its
primarily administrative, and the power to authority, it gravely abuses or exceeds its
hear and determine controversies is jurisdiction.
granted as an incident to the
administrative duty, the power is √ Philex Mining Corp. v. Zaldivia 43 SCRA 479 (1972)
administrative. Such a power is variously Facts: Mining controversy involves contractual relations
held to be judicial but validly conferred to between the litigants.
be quasi-judicial. Held: The issues involves pure questions of law. There is no
2. Where function primarily to decide question question of fact nor matters requiring technological
of legal rights knowledge and experience. Judicial power is not conferred
Where the duty is primarily to decide upon Director of Mines. The controversies to be submitted
questions of legal rights between private and resolved by the Director of Mines under the Mining Law
parties, such decision being the primary refer only to the overlapping claims and administrative
object and not merely incidental to matters incidental thereto. The question presented is
regulation or some other administrative judicial in nature, not a mining conflict, and it is immaterial
function, the function is judicial. whether the mining claim in question has or has not passed
out of administrative control of the Director of Mines.
Extent of judicial or quasi-judicial powers of
administrative agencies. √ Antipolo Realty Corp. v. NHA 153 SCRA 399 (1987)
1. Jurisdiction limited Facts: The NHA reinstated a contract to sell which was
Limited delegation of judicial or quasi- rescinded by the subdivision owner for nonpayment of
judicial authority to administrative monthly installments.
agencies is well-recognized in our Held: NHA was legally empowered to decide on the matter
jurisdiction because the need for special at issue under PD 957. A statute may vest exclusive original
competence and experience has been jurisdiction in an administrative agency over certain
recognized as essential in the resolution of disputes and controversies falling within the agency’s
questions of specialized character and special expertise. The very definition of an administrative
because of the companion recognition that agency includes its being vested with quasi-judicial powers.
the dockets of our regular courts have Under the sense-making and expeditious doctrine of
remained crowded and clogged. primary jurisdiction, the courts cannot and will not
2. Extent of powers depends largely on enabling determine a controversy involving a question which is within
act the jurisdiction of an administrative tribunal where the
Extent to which administrative agency question demands the exercise of sound administrative
may exercise such powers depend largely discretion requiring special knowledge to determine
on the provisions of the statute creating technical and intricate matters of fact.
or empowering such agency.
3. Split jurisdiction not favored √ Guerzon v. CA 164 SCRA 182 (1988)
The rule is that when an administrative Facts: Agency (Bureau of Energy Utilization) charged with
body is conferred quasi-judicial functions, regulating the operations and trade practices of the
all controversies relating to the subject petroleum industry ordered a service station operator-
matter pertaining to its specialization are lessee to vacate the service station and to turn over its
deemed to be included within its possession to the oil company lessor upon the expiration of
jurisdiction. Split jurisdiction is not the dealership and lease agreements.
favored. Held: BEU was not empowered to issue order to vacate.
4. Grant of particular power must be in the law There is nothing in PD 1206 that would suggest that
itself jurisdiction has been granted to the BEU. It is a
Where there is nothing in the law that fundamental rule that an administrative agency has only
would suggest that a particular power has such powers as are expressly granted to it by law and those
been granted, such as the power to decide that are necessarily implied in the exercise thereof. BEU’s
contractual disputes, the same cannot be jurisdiction is limited. It has no power to decide contractual
exercised. disputes between gasoline dealers and oil companies.
2. Delegation of power to make the law vs. delegation 11. The rule of non-delegation of legislative power
of authority or discretion as to the execution of a does not apply when permitted by the Constitution
law and in case of delegation to local governments
Delegation: make Delegation:
law execution of law US v. Ang Tang (1923)
Involves discretion Exercised in Facts: The Governor-General was authorized by an act,
as to WHAT the law pursuance of a law - whenever for any cause, conditions arise resulting in
shall be > what can be extraordinary increase in palay, rice, et. al, to issue and
delegated is the promulgate with the consent of the Council of State,
discretion to temporary rules and emergency measures for carrying
determine HOW the out the purpose of the act. Pursuant thereto, the
law may be enforced Governor-general issued a proclamation fixing the price
not WHAT the law of rice and penalizing violation thereof. Ang was
shall be prosecuted for violation of the law for selling a price
Delegation is VOID Delegation is VALID higher than that fixed in the proclamation.
Held: The law is incomplete as a legislation. The
3. The legislature may delegate its authority to make legislature does not undertake to specify or define
findings of fact (fact finding power) under what conditions or for what reasons the
Where delegation to a fact-finding body Governor-General shall issue the proclamation, but
empowers it to create the conditions says that it may be issued for cause and leaves the
which constitute the fact, the delegation is question of what is any cause to the discretion of the
INVALID Governor General. The law does not specify or define
4. The legislature must declare a policy and fix a what such temporary rules or emergency measures are,
standard in enacting a statute conferring or how long such rules shall remain in force. The
discretionary power determination of what acts constitute a criminal offense
But the agency may be authorized to “fill- is essentially a legislative task. The Governor-General,
up the details” cannot, by proclamation, determine what act shall
When the legislature laid down the constitute a crime or not.
fundamentals of a law, it may delegate to
administrative agencies the authority to Compania General De Tabacos v. Board of Public Utility
exercise such legislative power as is Commissioners (1916)
necessary to carry into effect the general Facts: A statute requires every public utility “to furnish
legislative purpose. annually a detailed report of finances and operations in
5. Under the sufficient standard test, there must be such form and containing such matters as the Board,
adequate guidelines or limitations in the law to from time to time, by order, may prescribe. The
map out the boundaries of the delegate authority. authority of the board is based on Act. 2307
6. It is not necessary that the legislature supply empowering it, “after hearing, upon notice, by order in
administrative officials with a specific formula for writing, to require every public utility detailed reports.”
their guidance -> more liberal in permitting grants Held: Authority given was very general. It is clear that
of discretion to administrative agencies the statute authorizes the Board to require detailed
7. The standard to guide an administrative agency in reports from public utilities, leaving the nature of the
the exercise of its rule-making power may be report, et. al., to the exclusive discretion of the Board.
either express or implied. Such a provision does not declare or set out or indicate
Implied -> policy and purpose of statute what information the State requires. No sufficient
8. In case of a delegation of a rate-fixing power, the standard prescribed by the Act. The legislature seems
only standard which the legislature is required to simply to have authorized the Board to require what
prescribe for the guidance of the administrative information the Board wants.
authority is that the rate be reasonable and just.
However, in the absence requirement as People v. Vera (1937)
to reasonableness, this standard may be Facts: C applied for probation under the Probation Act
implied. which shall apply only in those provinces in which the
9. Under the completeness test, a statute must be respective provincial boards have probation officers.
complete in itself so that by appropriate judicial The Act provides that it shall apply only in those
review and control, any action taken pursuant to provinces in which the respective provincial boards
delegated authority may be kept within the defined have provided for the salary of a probation officer at
limits of the authority conferred. the rates not lower than those now provided for
A statute may be complete when the provincial fiscals Said probation officers shall be
subject, the manner, and the extent of its appointed by the Secretary of Justice and shall be
operation are stated in it. subject to the direction of the Probation Office.
The test of completeness has been said to Held: There is no standard or guide fixed by the
be whether the provision is sufficiently Probation Act. The applicability and application of the
definite and certain to enable one to know Probation act are entirely placed in the hands of the
his rights and obligations thereunder provincial boards. The power to ascertain existence of
10. The general rule which requires an express acts or conditions as the basis of the taking into effect
standard to guide the exercise of discretion of of a law may be delegated. The legislature may provide
administrative agencies is subject to exceptions that a law shall take effect upon the happening of
future specified contingencies leaving to some other motor vehicles shall be registered if not equipped with
person or body the power to determine when the reflectors…”
specified contingency has arisen. However, discretion in Held: It is obvious that the challenged statute is a
the provincial boards is absolute and unlimited hence legislation enacted under the police power to promote
arbitrary. The legislature has not made the operation of public safety. To avoid the taint of unlawful delegation,
the Probation Act contingent upon specified facts or there must be a standard which implies at the very
conditions to be ascertained by the provincial board. It least that the legislature itself determines matters of
leaves the entire operation or non-operation of the law principle and lays down fundamental policy. Thereafter,
upon the provincial boards. While it may be undoubted the executive or administrative office designated may,
that the legislature may suspend a law, or the in pursuance of the above guidelines, promulgate
execution or operation of a law, a law may not be supplemental rules and regulations. The standard could
suspended as to certain individuals only, leaving the be implied from the policy and purpose of the act
law to be enjoyed by others. The suspension must be considered as a whole. In the Reflector Law, clearly the
general, and cannot be made for individual cases or for legislative objective is public safety. All that is required
particular localities. is that the regulation should be germane to the objects
and purposes of the law, that the regulation be not in
Palaez v. Auditor General (1965) contradiction with it but conform to the standards that
Facts: Statute confers on the President authority to the law prescribes.
create municipal corporations. The VP alleges that the
provision in the statute constitutes an undue delegation Echegaray v. Secretary of Justice (1998)
of legislative powers. Facts: Echegaray, a death convict, assails the
Held: The provision in question constitutes an undue constitutionality of RA 8177, the Lethal Injection Law,
delegation of power. Authority to create municipal on the ground that it unduly delegates legislative power
corporations essentially legislative in nature. Municipal to the Secretary of Justice and the Director of Bureau of
corporations are purely creatures of the statute. Corrections.
Whereas, the power to fix such common boundary in Held: There is no undue delegations of legislative
order to avoid or settle conflicts of jurisdiction between powers. The rule is that what has been delegated
adjoining municipalities, may partake of an cannot be delegated. The recognized exceptions to the
administrative nature, involving as it does, the adoption rule are as follows:
of means and ways to carry into effect the law creating 1. Delegation of tariff powers to the President
said municipalities. The provision does not meet the 2. Delegation of emergency powers to the President
requirements for a valid delegation of powers to fix in 3. Delegation to the people at large
the details in the enforcement of a law. It does not 4. Delegation to local governments
enunciate any policy to be carried out or implemented 5. Delegation to administrative bodies
by the President. It is apparent, however, from the
language of this clause, that the phrase “as the public Empowering the Secretary of Justice in conjunction with
welfare may require” qualified, not the clauses the Secretary of Health and the Director of Bureau of
preceding the one just quoted, but only the place to Corrections, to promulgate rules and regulations on the
which the seat of government may be transferred. If subject of lethal injection is a form of delegation of
the validity of the delegation made in Section 68 were legislative authority to administrative bodies. However,
upheld, there would no longer be any legal impediment the Implementing Rules and Regulations suffer serious
to a statutory grant of authority to the President to do flaws. The Secretary of Justice has practically abdicated
anything which, in his opinion may be required by the power to promulgate the manual on the execution
public welfare or public interest. procedure to the Director of the Bureau of Corrections,
by not providing for a mode of review and approval
Alegre v. Collector of Customs (1929) thereof. The Court also finds that the requirement of
Facts: The statute provides for the inspection, grading, confidentiality of the contents of the manual unduly
and bailing of fibers and the creation of the Fiber suppressive. The contents of the manual are matters of
Standardization Board to carry the law into effect. The public concern.
Board is authorized to determine the official standards Dissenting opinion: RA 8177 is void. A careful
for the various commercial grades of Philippine fibers reading will show that it actually authorizes two persons
and each grade shall have the approval of the to promulgate rules and regulations to implement its
Secretary of Agriculture and Natural resources. provisions – the Secretary of Justice and the Director of
Held: No delegation of legislative power involved. The the Bureau of Corrections. The unprecedented act of
Legislature has said that before any hemp is exported delegating the power to make rules to two persons over
from the Philippine islands, it must be inspected, the same subject matter does not have any
graded, and baled, and has created a board for that constitutional warrant. We should lay down the case
purpose and vested it with the power and authority to law that the legislative choice of who shall be the
do the actual work. It is nothing more than a delegation delegate to make the rules and regulations to
of administrative power in the Fiber Board to carry out implement a law must be clear and unequivocal.
the purpose and intent of the law.
Sufficiency of standards.
Edu v. Ericta (1970) 1. Dependent upon certain considerations
Facts: Administrative order implements Reflector Law. Depends upon the nature of the power
The order has a provision on reflectors in effect exercised
reproducing what was set forth in the Act, thus: “no