1) Andres Borromeo was appointed judge of the 24th Judicial District in 1914 and held that position until 1920 when he was appointed to the 21st Judicial District but refused to accept that appointment.
2) The court ruled that judges of first instance are appointed to specific districts and hold their positions until resigning, retiring, or being removed by impeachment. They cannot be forced to accept appointments to other districts against their will.
3) The court determined that Andres Borromeo was lawfully entitled to the position of Judge of the 24th Judicial District, and Fermin Mariano must be ousted from that position.
1) Andres Borromeo was appointed judge of the 24th Judicial District in 1914 and held that position until 1920 when he was appointed to the 21st Judicial District but refused to accept that appointment.
2) The court ruled that judges of first instance are appointed to specific districts and hold their positions until resigning, retiring, or being removed by impeachment. They cannot be forced to accept appointments to other districts against their will.
3) The court determined that Andres Borromeo was lawfully entitled to the position of Judge of the 24th Judicial District, and Fermin Mariano must be ousted from that position.
1) Andres Borromeo was appointed judge of the 24th Judicial District in 1914 and held that position until 1920 when he was appointed to the 21st Judicial District but refused to accept that appointment.
2) The court ruled that judges of first instance are appointed to specific districts and hold their positions until resigning, retiring, or being removed by impeachment. They cannot be forced to accept appointments to other districts against their will.
3) The court determined that Andres Borromeo was lawfully entitled to the position of Judge of the 24th Judicial District, and Fermin Mariano must be ousted from that position.
1) Andres Borromeo was appointed judge of the 24th Judicial District in 1914 and held that position until 1920 when he was appointed to the 21st Judicial District but refused to accept that appointment.
2) The court ruled that judges of first instance are appointed to specific districts and hold their positions until resigning, retiring, or being removed by impeachment. They cannot be forced to accept appointments to other districts against their will.
3) The court determined that Andres Borromeo was lawfully entitled to the position of Judge of the 24th Judicial District, and Fermin Mariano must be ousted from that position.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 1
ISSUE RULING
Law on Public Officers FACT
General Principles 10 Andres Borromeo vs Fermin Andres Borromeo was appointed and Whether plaintiff Judge Borromeo is Leaving out of consideration for the moment the last Mariano commissioned as Judge of the 24th entitled to the office of Judge of the part of section 155 of the Administrative Code, the GR L-16808 Jan. 3 1921 Judicial District, effective July 1, Court of First Instance of the 24th provisions of the Judiciary Law are plain and 1914. He duly qualified and took Judicial District. unambiguous. Judges of First Instance are appointed possession of the office on that date. judges of the courts of first instance of the respective On February, 25, 1920, he was judicial districts of the Philippines Islands. They are appointed Judge of the 21st Judicial not appointed judges of first instance of the Philippine District, and Fermin Mariano was Islands. They hold these positions of judges of first appointed Judge of the 24th Judicial instance of definite districts until they resign, retire, District. Judge Borromeo has since or are removed through impeachment proceedings. the latter date consistently refused The intention of the law is to recognize separate and to accept appointment to the 21st distinct judicial offices. Judicial District. Appointment and qualification to office are separate and distinct things. Appointment is the sole act of Judges of First Instance are those vested with the power to make it. Acceptance appointed by the Governor-General is the sole act of the appointee. Persons may be with the consent of the Philippine chosen for office at pleasure; there is no power in Senate to serve until they reach the these Islands which can compel a man to accept the age of 65 years. One Judge of First office. (22 R. C. L. 423.) If, therefore, anyone could Instance is commissioned for each refuse appointment as a judge of first instance to a judicial district, except the ninth. The particular district, when once appointment to this oath of office of the judge is "filed district is accepted, he has exactly the same right to with the clerk of the court to which refuse an appointment to another district. No other the affiant pertains and shall be person could be placed in the position of this Judge of entered upon its records." Judges of First Instance since another rule of public officers is, First Instance may only be detailed that an appointment may not be made to an office by the Secretary of Justice to which is not vacant. (29 Cyc., 1373.) In our temporary duty in a district other judgment, the language of the proviso to section 155 than their own for the purpose of of the Administrative Code, interpreted with reference trying land registration cases and for to the law of public officers, does not empower the vacation duty. The concluding Governor-General to force upon the judge of one portion of section 155 of the district an appointment to another district against his Administrative Code, to which will, thereby removing him from his district. particular attention is addressed by the Attorney-General, is, "but Plaintiff Andres Borromeo is lawfully entitled to the nothing herein shall be construed to possession of the office of Judge of the Court of First prevent a judge of first instance of Instance of the Twenty-Fourth Judicial District. It is one district from being appointed to our judgment that the defendant Fermin Mariano be judge of another district." A Judge shall be ousted from the office of Judge of the of First Instance can be removed Twenty-fourth Judicial District, and the plaintiff from office by the Governor-General placed in possession of the same. The motion for only if in the judgment of the reconsideration filed by the Attorney-General is Supreme Court sufficient cause shall denied. exist involving serious misconduct or inefficiency in office.
Consolidated Industries, Inc., Joseph C. Valentine and Shirley R. Valentine, Ronald J. Clayton and Jane H. Clayton v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 767 F.2d 41, 2d Cir. (1985)