the Illuminati: 101

(new edition: 2012)

by:
Jonathan Barlow Gee
 the Illuminati 101 (2012 ed.)
is hereby © by: Jonathan Barlow Gee
this: May 1, 2012.
www.benpadiah.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table of Contents:

I. Illuminati Philosophy 101:

A: Illuminist Luciferian-Satanism vs. Judaeo-Christian Islam:
B: What is Illuminist Luciferian-Satanism:
C: Illuminist Luciferian-Satanism and You:
D: the Future for Illuminist Luciferian-Satanism:

II. Illuminati History 101:

introduction:
A. the Yezidi:
B. the Assassin Cult:
C: the Priory of Zion:
D. the Hellfire Club:
E. the Bavarian Illuminati:
F: the Skull and Bones:
G. the Golden Dawn:
H: the OTO:
I. Thule:
J. Majestic 12 and the Federal Reserve:
K. the Order of the Peacock Angel:
L. the Bildeberg Group and Bohemian Grove Camp:

III. Illuminati Symbolism 101:

A. the eye, the pyramid, the circumpunct and the triangle:
1. the Circumpunct:
2. the Triangle:
3. Symbolic Meaning:
4. Use in Media:
a. the Cult of Anubis:
5. Subliminal Use:
B. from “where the IO stands today”:
1. IO axiom 1: “in the Kingdom of the Blind, the One Eye’d Man is King”:
2. the Illuminati Trinity:
3. the Statue of Liberty:
C. the double-headed phoenix symbol:
1. alchemy:
2. Hapsburg-Romanov crests:
3. the 33rd degree:
4. Eagles and Shields:

appendix 1: books by and about Adam Weishaupt’s Order of Illuminati:

appendix 2: list of websites relevant to the modern IO:

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Philosophy of the
 Illuminati Philosophy 101A-D
is hereby © by: Jonathan Barlow Gee
this: May 1, 2012.
www.benpadiah.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table of Contents:

topic: Illuminism 101A

title: Illuminist Luciferian-Satanism vs. Judaeo-Christian Islam
author: Jonathan Barlow Gee
organisation: the Pythagorean Order of Death (POD)
location: Tallahassee, Florida, USA
date: 4-25-2012

topic: Illuminism 101B

title: What is Illuminist Luciferian-Satanism?
author: Jonathan Barlow Gee
organisation: the Pythagorean Order of Death (POD)
location: Tallahassee, Florida, USA
date: 4-26-2012

topic: Illuminism 101C

title: Illuminist Luciferian-Satanism and You.
author: Jonathan Barlow Gee
organisation: the Pythagorean Order of Death (POD)
location: Tallahassee, Florida, USA
date: 4-27-2012

topic: Illuminism 101D

title: the Future for Illuminist Luciferian-Satanism
author: Jonathan Barlow Gee
organisation: the Pythagorean Order of Death (POD)
location: Tallahassee, Florida, USA
date: 5-1-2012

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

insanity clause #23:

Please do not share with others the web addresses for direct download from my site that are for
sale there. However, once you have a copy of any one of my works, you are allowed, by Jonathan
Gee, the author of said work, to copy and distribute it freely. If you claim you wrote it, or that you
came up with the ideas for it yourself, you should be challenged to determine if you can prove
your claim with knowledge of the material superior to my own. If you can, I will concede the work
to your credit, but if you cannot, then the work will remain both of ours to teach and give to whom
we choose.
topic: Illuminism 101A
title:!Illuminist Luciferian-Satanism vs. Judaeo-Christian Islam
author: Jonathan Barlow Gee
organisation: the Pythagorean Order of Death (POD)
location: Tallahassee, Florida, USA
date: 4-25-2012

synopsis:

The ideas of right and wrong are universally known of, and cannot be denied by
ignorance. Thus, there does exist a moral argument for a proclivity within all nature
toward the opposite extremes of these binary options, eg. a universally generalisable
axiom encompassing the entirety of all di-polar choices between "good" or "evil."
This supra-natural realm, invisibly super-imposed as idea onto nature by our
morally-reasoning minds as a species, is necessarily 1:1 with the history of the entire
cosmos, but may also supercede our world-line up-till and including now, and imply
the existence of a "penumbra" or "halo" beyond and around the edge of the present-
lens on the light-cone sum-over-histories. This perpetualy retreating horizon
comprising the short-term future, insofar as it is both ideal and morally-reasoned,
may prove divisible into the world-lines of a "heaven" and a "hell." The existence of
two, potentially parallel, time-lines beyond our own is implied, further, to justify the
"intelligent design" model for our own plane of existence as being a middle-ground
between these extremes. The ultimate polarity of "right," of "good" and of "heaven" is
"God," while the ultimate polarity of "wrong," of "evil" and of "hell" is "Satan." This
essay will attempt to analyse the manner in which this model implies to the minds of
our species, falsely, a concept of duty to serve either side of this debate.

introduction:

What makes a man "good"? It is said, "good comes from within and is shown forth by a
man's actions, their deeds." However, the same is said to be true for "evil." Thus,
"good" and "evil" may both be traits within us all that can only be shown forth by our
actions and deeds. Therefore, both "good" and "evil" exist within us before we express
them because both are ideas that our morally-reasoning minds super-impose onto
ourselves and our natural realities. "Good" and "evil" are both ideas, but they are
agreed by all alive and who have lived before now to not be able to co-exist within
one's minds toether at the same time. One can't embrace the idea of "good" to its
fullest at the same time one is embracing the idea of "love" to its fullest, because these
are opposite conditional mental-states. For example, "love" and "hate" are strong
passions, but essentially boil down to "approach" or "avoid," the same "fight" or
"flight" instinct that is innate even in binary-ended flat-worms. However, if we
"love" and "hate" someone at the same time, our passion will feed on this instinct
until we lose our mental sense of well-being and sense of survival entirely.
Essentially, the proof that "good" and "evil" cannot be co-held at once in anyone's
mind is that all who do so end up becoming a danger to their society and to their
surroundings.

So, what makes anything "good"? There is no popular consensus, and the majority of
our species throughout the period of our written histories at least have failed to
resolve this issue before now either. It is said that the ratio of "good" to "evil" favours
evil because what is Good is Only Good, but what is good AND Also evil is really only
Evil. Therefore, it is inherently a trait of good within natural reality to be rare, but
not due to that being a necessary trait of "good" as a universally generalisable
truism. So, for example, it can be said, "goodness is scarce, but scarcity is not good." If
"good" and "evil" are both ideas originating from within the mind, but which can
only be expressed and apprehended as active deeds over time, !but "good" is rarer
than "evil," than we can postulate the following to be a truism of "good" in general:

"A Good is what one has less of than one wants." Thus, a "Good" exists in reality,
defined by scarcity of supply and increase of demand; but "Good" as an ideal exists
only outside reality, in the invisible underworld of the mind. An "ideal Good" is
anything that is "too good to be true," meaning that it is "ideal" and exists outside of
reality, but can still be apprehended by the mind. The sum total of one's imagination
is, for example, "too good to be true," and thus it is the products of one's imagination,
ideals and mind that become the products of their active deeds; thus, a "good idea"
made real is a "good" or "service."!Although the majority of our species might say
their mental imaginations far exceed the possibilities for modern reality to provide
them the building materials necessary to realise their loftiest dreams, this in itself
explains why "goods" are rare, while 3/4ths of all energy and time is spent making
"bad ideas" real instead. Even our imagination is, ultimately, based at least 3/4ths of
the time on the reality we perceive outside. The mental realm itself is comprised of:
the "good" imagination - that which is entirely free; and the "bad" imagination - that
part based on prior reality; as well as the realms of past-memories; and dreams,
which combine memories and the realm of the imagination. Past memories, dreams,
"bad ideas" and "good ideas" combine to form the invisible realm of the mind.
Memories, dreams and "bad" ideas are "evil" while only the free imagination is "good"
because the mind follows the same rules for ratios of "good" to "evil" as reality (the
two must be exactly 1:1 correspondent).

terminology:

The mind is made up of: 1) past-memories, considered evil for being based upon
materially real events; 2) dreams, considered a combination of real-memories with
imagination, considered evil for being partially based on reality; 3) "foolish ideas,"
based on "wrong" choices and considered evil for distracting activity toward evil
deeds; 4) "inspiring ideals," based on "right" choices and considered the sole "good" in
the realm of the mind for being scarce.

Reality is comprised of both natural and artificial constructions of material

environments. The mind super-imposes itself morally onto the nature of its
surroundings. Thus, reality is below the realm of the mind like the land and ocean
are below the air and starry-skies. Insofar as "reality" is determined by imposing the
ratio of "3/4 more evil than good" then the mental realm must also be considered
"true" in the sense of being a super-natural appendix to material reality.

Thus, there are two forms of "Good": 1) a real "good," such as a commodity that one
desires to acquire from someone else through a fair method of transaction with them;
and 2) an "ideal good," defined as a "good idea" that deserves to be made real and
would benefit nature if it were.

methodology:

The condition of our species existing in natural material reality and in societies with
one another is predicated on the dualism between accepting reality as a "necessary
evil" and desiring inspiration as the "highest ideal." There are various forms of
expression in our active deeds this can engender: 1) enlightenment: when the mind
is able to transcend all stressors in its immediate physical environment immediately
and ascends directly to a state of calm clarity in which the most reasonable choice
becomes most rapidly apparent. 2) meditation: when the mind must set itself aside for
a time before being able to attain a state of calm clarity where inspiration may be
allowed to occur without impedence. 3) struggle: when the mind aspires toward the
ideal of calm clarity and inspiration, but fails to be able to achieve these for any
prolonged duration due to environmental stressors and the distractions of reality. 4)
self-suppression: when the mind must actively prevent itself from succumbing to
distractions in order to simply survive, thus causing itself to avoid ALL temptations,
even those potentially leading to a better situation for that mind.

Wherever there is dualism there is quadruplism implied. Thus, between "God" and
"Satan" there are 3 other pairs of opposite conditions: 1) "right" vs. "wrong," 2)
"good" vs. "evil," and 3) "heaven" vs. "hell." However, from here on out, the more
subtle distinctions so far idenfied will be considered as consistently implied by the
nature of this topic, however will not be dwelt on in such detail. As we have seen
already, the 75% or 3/4ths ratio of "evil" to "good" in all things, both "real" in the
material sense and / or in the solely mental sense, is the direct result of this
quadrupling of the initial duality. The result of this ratio is the conclusion: "good is
rare and evil plentiful in reality and the mind." However, from this point in this
essay onwards, we will be looking not at the moral terms of "good" and "evil," but the
history of our species' understanding of these as personified concepts in the forms of
"God" and "Satan."

history:

The fossil record indicates the hominid populations would have been too sparse and
too dispersed to consistently cross one anothers' nomadic migrational routes.
However, it is an obvious fact of pre-historical record-keeping times that at some
point multiple tribes of early peoples met and exchanged artefacts and ideas that
each had previously only been developing within the confines of each individual
tribe. While this may not have happened consistently, it must have happened at least
once, and this event defines the origin of multi-cultural society. At this moment in
pre-history is when the origin of the idea of "God" took place. Immediately after this
event, the people involved were left to compete against one another for the "good"
portions of the idea. Instead of all understanding "God" the same way, each person
present saw the vision of this ideal uniquely. All took back with them an enlarged
concept than they arrived with of what constitues an "ideal good" in the form of the
other tribes' shared artefacts and ideas; however no two tribes would use this
expanded knowledge shared between them all in exactly the same way as each other.
From the first multi-tribal exchange of artefacts and ideas, the concept of "God" was
born, and from the resultant competition between the tribes to acquire the "goods" of
the other, opposing tribes, immediately followed from this the birth into reality of
the idea of "Satan."

The moral of the original multi-cultural social exchange between tribes of early
peoples was this: sharing of artefacts and ideas is an inherent good, while
competition over partial artefacts and suppression of any ideas is, thus, an ultimate
evil. Thus, by trading artefacts and sharing ideas, man invented the idea of "God,"
however, immediately following from this, by competing over broken shards using
the tactic of lies, came the naturally equal opposition, the idea of "Satan." If "God" is
"good," and distraction-free imagination, trading of artefacts and sharing of ideas are
good, then "Satan," being "evil," and "evil" being the opposite of "good," is thus a
"God" of war, strife, plague, famine, dismay, rumors, lies and death. If "God" is "good,"
then "Satan" is the equal and opposite "Adversary of God."
Over time economies grew around the earliest exchanges of artefacts and ideas. The
more cultures crossed paths, the more societies began to take root and grow at these
intersection-points. These societies became huge cities (with fortified walls ten feet
thick in one case, or located on twin hills straddling a river in another) on
strategically defensible geography. The residents who lived at these social juncture-
points became less nomadic than those who passed through them as hunters or
herdsmen; they fed themselves by farming plants and taming animals, and
eventually established their cities as a reflection of their priorities for survival,
their class structure being based on a small inner city with greatest fortifications to
barricade themselves in with store-houses for siege-supplies, surrounded by a
metropolis inside a second fortified defensive wall, surrounded in turn by a suburban
rural farm-land where herds-men worked the land to provide food to the urban city-
dwellers. This was the time when the role of "shaman" or "medicine-man" as "priest"
of the "church" split from the role of "chief" or "elder" as "king" of the
"government." The chief-king organised the city-planning, the class-structure
prioritising and could conscript an army to defend the city. The shaman-priest
organised the gathering into the store-houses of grains and meats, and their re-
distribution from there first to feed themselves and the king, then to the vassals,
then the serfs, then the slaves from conquered tribes, etc.

Eventually there arose three great economic empire regions:

1) the Vedic Indo-Europeans of southern Asia created the caste system, which
continues ot serve to this day as the basic model for any form of "society" or "social
structure," and is based on variably three to five levels of social "rank" or "value to
society" based on physical fitness, horizontal money-supply, mental apptitude and
vertical money-demand. The class system incorporated the "ruling class" including
the king and priest, the "citizens" who serve some social-good, and the "slaves" who
service the wills of the citizens. The Vedic, Indo-European economy was based on use
of parallel currencies, metal coins and paper currency-notes.

2) the Sumero-Akkadian and later Babylonian empire of the Tigris-Euphrates rivers'

valley, where a somewhat similar social system evolved, however was allowed to build
up a much larger military and eventually conquer much of the middle-east, from the
Taurus mountains in the east to the Meditteranean Sea in the west, because it allowed
the over-extension of credit notes past the due amount of value in metal coins, thus
inflating the perceived value of their economy by militarily conscripting a slave
class of foreigners by foreclosures into indentured servitude. The Sumero-
Babylonian empire used clay engraved with cuneiform to keep banking records, but
eventually circulated more cylindar-seal stamped credit currency than they could
back with value of saved metals in their banks, and so the Babylonian empire
eventually deteriorated from within and the region, by now, has become a desert.

3) the ancient Egyptian Old-Kingdom was founded when the Scorpion-King, Sargon 1,
unified upper- and lower-Egypt along the Nile river in north-eastern Africa.
Pyramid-shaped tomb building developed as the primary cross-cultural unifier
between the socieites of the northern lower-Nile and the southern upper-Nile. To
construct the massive pyramids erected in Giza and elsewhere throughout ancient
Egypt, a work-force of millions was needed. The Egyptian Pharaohs, "Gods in flesh,"
organised a two-tier class system of northern-Hyksos and southern-Nubian workers
by paying them both in gold coins. Eventually, the project would near completion,
and by then the ruling potentate of the era would have tipped the pay-scale to favour
the architects more than the laborers, such that one designer might make the same
amount of gold as ten builders. This imbalance stagnated Egypt and ushered in a
millennia of decadent luxury there, finally ending only by a cross-cultural invasion
from Mediterranean Rome.

I mention these as being defined by their forms of economic trade, because these
empires all pre-existed the concept of there being only ONE "God." These empires
were all pantheists, who believed in many Gods, one guarding over and guiding each
and every thing in natural reality, and though they lasted for nearly 6,000 years
their ways of life are forgotten and mysterious now to the minds of modern mono-
theists. These empires provided material "Goods" in exchange for their citizens'
participation in the city-state's society. Thus, their "Good" is defined as material in
natural, while the "Good" of monotheist societies has been to seek the ideal good of an
inspired mind. This idealism brings into being the social juxtaposition between the
roles of the chief-priest and the king. If one is "good," the other may be "evil." Thus,
the separation of church and state in monotheist societies is as alike oil and water as
"God" and "Satan."

Monotheism, though some modern monotheists might be shocked to discover such,

did not begin as worship of the universal ego as the one-true-God based on its being a
constantly present idea shared in everyone's mind. It began when Abraham (also
called Endubsar or ImHotep) rejected the remainder of all Gods in the existing
pantheon shared among the three earliest empries (of s.Asia, the m.East, and
n.Africa), and chose to follow only one from among them all, whom he decided he
would choose for himself. Thus, the concept of monotheism as the "one God" came
into use following it being distinctively divided from the remainder of a pantheon of
other, equal "Gods." Abraham called his "one God only" concept "Elohim," meaning
"my God," and chose to call his "one God" the "king" ("havdhnya" or "ahdvnhay"
derived into "adonai"). Eventually, pantheons of infinite Gods followed suit to this
sage and began to narrow their numbers of deities to smaller sums, mostly to seven,
to twelve, to three or to some such combination.

The ironic fact of monotheism's "one God" idea being an invention of only one wise
individual escapes the minds of the modern follower of monotheist religion who fully
believes that the "one true God" is the "universal" (for which the latin word is
"catholic") "All" (or "mind of the cosmos"). To the modern monotheist there can be no
doubt, no question at all, that there is a universal conscious-mind, because they
believe it to be speaking to them in their own minds when they are inspired. That is
the modern definition for the monotheist concept of "God": an inspired mind-state.
"Allah" is only a derivation of the word "Elohim" and "Jah" only a corruption of
"YHVH" the vowels of "Adonai." To the modern monotheist, "God" simply IS the "mind
of the universe." No further doubts or questions are possible for them.

If "God" is the "conscious ego" or "brain" of the "universe," then that would mean
"Satan," God's opposite, would be the "subconscious id" or "heart" of "reality." And this
is quite accurate to the manner the majority of modern monotheists would define the
current situation. For the past 2000 years or so, this has been the general perception,
and little else has been modified from the original template for the model of building
societies. 2000 years ago Rome arose and fell, and since then much of "western
civilisation's" history has been comprised of applying the earliest formation for city-
states to the more nomadic woods-dwelling celts, saxons, gauls, anglish and germanic
Europeans.

Now, in the last 100 years, from 1900 to 2000 ad, we have achieved so much as a
species that it would be a shame to lose, but which we are all too ready to part with
should it serve to help the resolve the fundamental difference in the cosmos between
the "good God" and the "evil Satan." Of course, no sacrifice we could ever offer could
abolish all evil, and so the myths of the major monotheisms of today that are
predicated on the promise of an afterlife are simply puffing smoke and peddling
mirrors. If, indeed, a "heaven" and "hell" exist, it will not be in reality we would find
them, but in a perpetual realm of bliss or suffering that exists in the eternal
recurrance of our final thought before dying. At the moment of death we confront
our own karma, weigh it opposite our mortality, and behold our self-value and worth.

evaluation:

Wishing for "God" - as defined as only one of the pantheon of all possible deities - or
for "Satan" - as defined as the adversary of that one God - to exist does not make them
do so. The "guiding light" of monotheist-dualism is a false flame of intellect projected
over and conflicting against the more blatantly obvious facts of material reality.
Thus, belief in "God" is a delusion, and one so popularised that we all suffer from it,
regardless of it being man-made. However, belief in God without it necessitating the
requisite belief also in his polar duality as "Satan" is still better than any form of
belief that allows into incorporate within itself the idea of "Satan" as a counter-point
result believed necessary due to the idealised existence of their own concept of "God."
There MIGHT be a God, but IF there is one, it does not imply the requisite existence of
"Satan."

Indeed, there are, apparent over-top of mutual consensus material solid reality,
morals of "right" and "wrong." We can all agree on most of these, and can all see it
clearly when someone is making a choice that will prove to be "wrong." However,
this does not logically justify rationalising the absolute extension of these mental
constructs of our minds to the ultimate anthropomorphications of "good" and "evil" as
"God" and "Satan." "Right" and "Wrong" DO exist. "Good" and "Evil" MIGHT exist. "God"
and the "Devil" MAY exist, but if either do, what should it concern us as individuals,
for it would be a cosmic plight beyond our capacity to influence.

In the same sense as denying the proofs for the existence of God given by the
monotheist relgions of today does not invalidate the possible existence of God, neither
does it imply accepting the existence of "Satan" as an only alternative to the
postulates provided by the modern religions. The pondersome existence and
simultaneous non-existence of the idea of God has become the domain of the
churches of religion, and these have become divested of any role whatsoever in
providing any material goods to the community. "Charity" is a "duty" in monotheist
faiths because to them the "will" of each individual must be "bridled" and "tamed" to
do "good" deeds in accordance with their faith's commands. People are not, by nature,
"good." However, the more relgious priests flee from the mental distractions of
necessary survival to embrace the idealism of inspired thinking, the less material
good they manage to accomplish for their community. They embrace "wealth
redistribution" as a form of reclaiming their role protecting grain store-houses in
pre-historic proto-cities. However, chairty is a naturally ideal good, not the forced
redistribution of material goods. You cannot "force someone to be good."

The more energy we focus on suppressing imaginary evils which we create within
ourself by fear of what is beyond our present knowledge, the longer the duration of
time it will take us to achieve any beneficial goals. The more our mind is free and
clear of all these spooks, ghosts, haunts and demons who plague our perceptual plane
with distractions, the better and the sooner we will be able to contribute any true
good to our society of choice.
conclusion:

Although there may or may not be a "one true God" or a "Satan" opposite Him based
on this data set, it should be obvious by now that any form of worship and praise we
offer to either is wholely personal, unique to each individual, and thus, universally
random and arbitrary. If "good" and "evil" are truisms, than rather than "good" facts
proving "God" and / or "Satan" a truly universal axiom, we have instead only "evil"
belief that they both do, regardless of any proof either in favour or to the contrary.
Monotheists have come to believe that "God exists BECAUSE we Believe him to." There
is no arguing logically against someone who refuses to use the rules of logic as their
guide.

Thus, the entire argument of which is a "better" religion between monotheist Judeao-
Christian Islam and Illuminist Luciferian-Satanism is moot. There is no "better"
religion between the two, because essentially both of them are false. The fact the
religion of monotheism is false does not disprove the possible existence of an all-good
"one true God." It simply means that the religion of Satanism and the religion of God
that also believes in Satan are both equally evil and to blame for the existence of evil
in the form of the concept of "Satan." Only the religion of God that denies the
existence of "Satan" can be considered "true" to the concept of "God" as the "one true"
and "Most High" ideal good.

Ultimately, your religion is your choice. You are given, by the origin of nature, free-
will. No one can choose your path for you, you must choose it for yourself. You are
constantly being faced with two options and being told to choose. The correct choice
can only be made when the mind is calm and clear. Thus, it is best to calm and clear
your mind before making any choice, no matter how mundane or difficult. This
clarity of mind is an inherent "good" that we can offer in thanks of the gift given us
by nature of the right to choose between "right" and "good" or "wrong" and "evil."

prediction:

As we approach the winter-solstice date of the galactic-solar-planetary equatorial

alignment, Dec. 21, 2012, there will be an upsurgeance in research on the topic of
"illuminsm" and the philosophy of "illuminati Luciferian-Satanism." Now, my
readers, you will know how to answer them whenever someone comes to you asking
questions about this topic.

topic: Illuminism 101B

title:!What is Illuminist Luciferian-Satanism?
author: Jonathan Barlow Gee
organisation: the Pythagorean Order of Death (POD)
location: Tallahassee, Florida, USA
date: 4-26-2012

synopsis:

Because there is no "morality" in reality, though it exists in a higher plane, so to

speak, of our mental projections that we super-impose invisibly over consensus
reality, there is no such thing as "right" or "wrong," aside from as subjective
variables symbolising a uselessly random system with no basis in facts. Because there
are no "right" or "wrong" in reality, only in the morality of our shared mental realm,
one could postulate that "good" is the mental realm, while "evil" is reality itself, and
continue this line of justification for psychosis to rationalise the existence of both
"God" and "Satan," or even only "God" as the supreme being above all the lower levels,
and thus explain the existence of "morality" as an "ideal" in itself. One could further
argue a system of levels that alternates between real and ideal, such that evil is
reality, good is idealism, Satan is false, yet God true. One can argue this system can
"wrap around" so that God can influence reality directly, but reality cannot change
the will of God. This system is "good" insofar as it is logically convincing to our moral
minds. However, is it true at all? If it is not, then there MIGHT be NO God, and thus all
religions, both of "good" and in favour of the anti-thesis of that popular consensus
concept, and thus for "evil," MIGHT be equally futile and false.

introduction:

Is it "better" to bring peace, or to make war? This all depends on the pre-existing
condition. If war pre-exists peace, it is better to make peace. If peace precedes war, it
is worse to bring war. However, in reality, there is peace in one place and war in
another, such that when one war in one place ends and they have peace there, then
another war starts in another place that had been at peace before. There is,
somewhere, always war. The concept, tried twice, of a "world-wide war" - where the
more technologically developed nations carpet-bomb and conquer their poorer
neighbors, !where whichever side uses its resources fastest is defeated,!and which
end with only the conquered half of all profiteers and killers being charged with
war-crimes - has failed to end this viscious cycle of violence, which is moreover
apparently inherent in all species on this planet, not only our own. If our species
were wiped out, others would evolve to achieve what we have, and it is more than a
little likely they would also succumb to the emotional temptation to use their
technologies as weapons and make war. If the moral truism "an eye for an eye leaves
the whole world blind" were true, then sooner or later this planet we live on now
WILL be totally destroyed in a war.

As discussed in section A, the law of binary dualism implies the equality of

quadrupled options due to the possibility for over-lap and thus imbalance implied
between the extreme opposites. Just as we can say that only 1/4th of all possible
options in such a system is truly "good," without any impurity due to admixture with
its opposite, so too can we say that only 1/4th of all options that exist in such a system
would be truly "evil." There would be 1/2 of the total equation that would constitute
the imbalanced conditions of reality, where in some places there is "more good than
evil," and elsewhere "more evil than good." Just as "ideal good" cannot exist in
relationship to "real evil," neither is "ideal evil," in its fullest extreme, existent
anywhere in reality. A "real good," or "service," is an economic commodity, while the
"ideal good" would be "God" as the "Most High good," who could not be commodified or
expressed in reality. Insofar as economics and money are the "root of all evil," and
they exist in reality, and insofar as reality is less than ideal, as we can imagine a
"better" world for ourselves, reality in general is evil, while the ideal of "God" alone
is an "ideal good," and "Satan" alone the opposite in being an "ideal evil."

The problem with any binar-based system is that, no matter how many levels one
multiplies it to, it will remain binarily divisible, and will always break even, so to
speak, by providing any new level with an equal and opposite component; if any vote
were taken in such a binary system, it would always tie, and thus, no change would
be able to occur. Because the system remains "balanced," any sudden "imbalance" in
one location must be immediately corrected by a "re-balancing" toward that location
by the entire surrounding area. Such a model as the binary-based system is
argueably an ideal or not, and argueably real or not. In truth, however, in either
case, it should not be held to exist in a vaccum apart from any other possible systems.
Systems such as, for example, the odd-numbered system do allow for "growth" and
"expansion" and, when morality is super-imposed onto the changes thus caused,
these changes can be considered "good" or "evil" progress in either the "right" or
"wrong" direction, etc. In a binary-based system, we do not see the possibility for
exponential growth, only arithmetic, as each new addition is coupled, but this
coupling does not in itself produce any new addition, as we see to be the case in odd-
numbered trinary dialectics, where the merger of "thesis" and "anti-thesis" yields a
new "synthesis," which then serves to reproduce as "thesis" by pairing with its polar
opposite as an "anti-thesis," etc. ad infinitum. The difference between a "binary" and
an "odd-numbered" system is that in a binary system, any change rebalances to a
new level, while in an odd-numbered system, balance is never attained, stasis is
impossible, and change constantly occurs instead. Both exist in reality, thus neither
can be likened to the ideal "good" of "God" nor "evil" of "Satan," which can exist only
beyond reality as ideals in the mind.

In reality, that is, material, solid reality, no ideals exist unless we make them exist by
constructing symbols of them using existing material objects in solid reality. This is
the essence of "idolism," which would mean the "bringing down" into reality of ideals
using symbolic material objects to represent the ineffable and unattainable ideal
itself. Money, for example, is a symbol of value, as opposed to being the ideal of
"Value" in itself. Thus, in reality, we find there exist BOTH binary or even-numbered
AND dialectic or odd-numbered systems, thus proving neither is, itself, at all "ideal."
However, just as symbols can exist, and be used as moral truisms to justify arguing
the existence of the ideal they represent, so too are both binary and dialectic systems
used in arguments to prove the final truth about "good" and "evil," even though, in
reality, there can be no final proof of any ideal.

definitions:

If we can say that no ideal can exist in reality, but that any material object can be
used to symbolise any ideal, we might come to believe that objects, when used as
symbols of non-real ideals, are elevated in meaning to the status of a more idealised
form of "meta-object," imbued with symbolic meaning refering to the non-real ideal
it represents to us. Insofar as "belief" or "imagination" in the mind may imbue any
object with symbolic meaning refering to any ideal, this theory itself might be used
as a justification in reality for the existence and usefulness in symbolising an ideal.
However, neither this argument of using both binary and dialectic systems to
symbolise the ideals of "right" and "wrong" nor the use of symbols as "meta-objects"
to idolize ideals, is a material reality in itself, merely another mental projective form
of ideal. If no ideal can exist in reality, no amount of justification will prove the
opposite. Morality, logic and the entire ideal mental realm are non-real and do not
exist in material, solid reality. No symbol can dis-prove this.

Thus, we can define "symbols" as real objects we imbue with additional meaning to
rationally and morally justify our mental belief in imaginary ideals such as "right"
and "wrong." We can define reality, additionally, as being corrupted by the influence
of BOTH good AND evil, and thus say only in the ideal realm of the mind do the
ultimate extent of this binary idea truly exist as "God" and "Satan," but that, no matter
how we symbolise these in reality using material objects, neither can be "brought
down" and "made real" by simply imbuing any object with this symbolic meaning.

Because no amount of moral reasoning can cause "good" or "evil" to exist in reality,
no argument is possible that can either prove or disprove the moral use of symbols
nor the existence of any mental ideal. The fact ideals cannot exist, and the fact
symbols used for them are all arbitrary, are often ignored by many of our species.
Instead, we embrace the use of symobls in place of ideals themselves, and we believe
in the existence of ideals, and that our belief in their existence is what causes them to
have that existence. We believe in the real existence of our mental realm, our mind.
However, this does not make our mental realm, the ideals of our minds, real existing
objects in material reality.

methodology:

By detaching the concepts of real objects that are used as idealised symbols by being
imbued with additional meaning from our mental realms, and the ideals these
symbols are used to represent, from the solid, material reality of objects, we can
differentiate between the object in reality itself and the subjective meaning we
super-impose on it with our mind. This method determines the difference between
what is "true" in reality and what is only a "higher truth" in our minds, to
distinguish between which exists in reality and which is merely a hallucination
inside our imaginations. Thus, because "good" and "evil" are ideals that exist only in
the mind, they do not exist as any real object in material reality.

Because symbols of ideals are used as "meta-objects" by our species to give additional
meaning to regular solid objects, the useo f symbols collectively can be considered by
its micro-application in the form of written language. A book of history is a symbol
of history, but the past before they were born cannot be truly known by anyone. A
symbol of the past can only influence one's mind to make different choices than they
would by instinct, however it cannot prove the existence, in the present, of any truth
about past events, which now no longer exist. No historical artefact can truly
convince the morally reasoning mind the universe did not simply pop into existence
the moment they were born into it. If nothing we imagine can be considered "true"
in the sense of being a solid material object in itself, then objects we create or alter
using written language to symbolise the ideals of our minds, no matter how many
other minds they may influence in the future, are arbitrary and lies.

If we look at the history of written history itself, we can find through the study of
changeing symbols, that is, the use of different solid, material objects over time to
signify the same, single unchangeing ideal, and can prove the futility of believing
one needs to do so to learn and improve their own instinctive ideals. The arbitrary
assignation of symbolic meaning to any material object causes that object to decay at
an increased rate, and eventually to be destroyed prior to our belief in its usefulness
ceasing. Even this, the longevity of our belief in a symbol beyond the very ability of
the object we use for it to exist, is taken as morally logical argument to justify the
existence of ideals as a "higher reality." Of course, our destruction of one material
object as a natural resource after another, ad infinitum, is excused by this argument
as being "morally logical," but the fact this arugment itself is ex post facto and
imaginary itself is ignored.

history:

Logic and Morality are the twin children of written language. If written language
had never been invented, neither morality nor logic would exist. If all capacity for
written language were destroyed, morality and logic would cease also. Morality, as a
justification for making an argument, and logic, the manner of constructing the
argument to successfully convince someone else's mind, can only exist so long as
written language exists, because written language, as a symbolic system for making
an argument, can be made to exist as a material, solid object in reality. However, only
within written language do the ideals of morality and logic exist anywhere in reality.
Logic and morality are symbols of an ideal good and a necessary evil used to acquire
it, but if all written language were erased, neither would persist.

Some state communication using verbal language is the invention of our species, and
none others use symbolic language verbally to communicate as we do. This is
obviously wrong, since every animal species on this planet makes some form of
verbal noise to communicate with its own kind, and even other species also. Yet, the
invention of symbolic language to communicate can be proven unique to our species
as an invention in its form as writing, an invention we owe entirely to our thumb's
use in creating it, and not to our species' ability to use language to speak.

A written record of events in our species existence signifies the entirety of our
concept of history, as it unfolded here on our planet prior to our personal birth. No
other species perserves their history in this way. This method is unique to humans
and is how we measure the difference between our species and all others. The written
record of our species' history is what we base our belief as a species for morality and
logic upon. Without the written record of history, no logical argument would exist for
morality, and we would need to, if it had proved useful, re-invent the record as proof
for the existence of logical morality. Outside of writings, we can find no other proof
in reality for the existence of either logic or morality.

The most basic principles of logic are identity and cause and effect: "A = A" and "if A
therefore B." The most basic principles of morality are ideals that are only
symbolically expressed in logical terms. Thus "good = good," and thus "if good exists
thus also there must be such a thing as evil." In short, the written letters of our
symbolic language themselves comprise the format of logic, and thus logic is used to
argue the existence of binary morality. Because written language exists as a series of
alphabetic letters, logic is premised on language, and thus morality on logic.

We cannot say now that "written language does not exist as a material object in solid
reality," nor that "history itself does not exist as the records of all our species' written
languages." Therefore, symbolically within these texts, "morality" and "logic" can be
argued to exist in reality; even though there is no proof for either outside these
books. However, it cannot be argued that, because writing exists, the subjects of the
writing must necessarily also exist. This is because writing is only symbolic of
morality and logic, and thus, though useful in expressing our species' imaginary
ideals, does not prove they exist as material objects in solid reality. The book about
"Moby Dick" itself is not a real "white whale." No amount of logical morality can
prove the existence as a material object of "good" or "evil," because in truth neither
exist in reality, as both are purely mental ideals.

The argument is often made that, by containing good and evil symbollically as
records of history, the material objects of books about history are, themselves, a
"meta-object" form of "better" reality that symbolises mental idealisms. Again, any
object used as a symbol will be rendered extinct before the expiration of its
usefullness. Gold coins can be hoarded away from their use in the free-market as
money; paper bills will expire before their users can reclaim their holdings in
metals; the idea of "God" will die out long before the religions of monotheism are
prepared to let Him go. By valuing any object as a symbol, it depletes that object's
supplies to immitate in reality the scarcity of non-real ideals. By using any object as
a symbol, we use its supplies in material reality up faster. Thus, the value of books as
a symbol of idealism is increased along with their scarcity. If there were only one
book, it would be considered most ideal. Such is, in modern times, the "Bible,"
comprised of the religious history of Judeao-Christian Islam.

It is also often argued over whether this one book, the "Bible" of mono-theist
religions, is an authentic symbol of idealism or not. It is said by some, "the bible is
inaccurate in some regards, therefore less ideal as a symbol of history," while it is
said by others, "the bible is the literal word of God." Neither of these arguments
amounts to any proof either way, because the entire argument itself is moot. Arguing
over the amount of truth in the Bible is like arguing over the exact amount of wheat
content in a loaf of bread. The argument is irrelevant to the object's use itself. The
use of a loaf of a bread to the stomach is equal to the use of any book to the mind,
which consumes and lives off the ideals of other people just as the stomach must
consume a variety of foods to survive. If the stomach doesn't eat, the body dies, and if
the mind does not think, it cannot be said to be "alive" in the sense of active deeds
either. For every hundred thoughts the average mind consumes from outside itself, it
might produce one original idea of its own. Thus, the value of the one-book, the
monotheist "Bible, as a symbol of all human history assembled as a series of logical
consequences proving the existence in reality of the moral ideal, is due to its length.
Because it's a long book, it inspires more original thoughts on average than most
other works of equal percentage fiction.

The existence of the "Bible" as the history of our species comprised to logically prove
the existence of morality as a final proof for the existence of "God" is irrelevant to
whether or not "God" exists, and thus is an arbitrary symbol for human belief alone,
and in itself can serve as evidence for the "higher truth" of nothing. The mental
realm elevates itself symbolically to the level of an ideal "God," but this does not mean
the mind itself is "God." In reality, there is no proof even for the existence of the
mind, let alone for its belief in "God" being able to bring "God" into being in reality.

evaluation:

As long as the Bible, as an artefact of our species' record of history, exists as a solid
object in material reality, people will continue to cling to it to logically justify their
belief in the idealism of the mental realm for proof of a non-existent God. Because the
argument of the futility of this is, itself a moot argument, the efficacy of the Bible as
proof of God will continue, while the logic to disprove the reality of morality will yet
elude those who apply logic to disprove the existence of morality. Logic depends on
morality, and so logic cannot be used to relieve itself of needing morality. Morality is
the ideal preceding it, and logic is then aimed to prove and make morality real.

The concept of "illuminist Luciferian-Satanism" is only as useful as a logical disproof

for the "Bible's" description of the monothesit "God" because of the limitations to the
definiton of "God" implied by its being a single material object. Beyond this,
"illuminst Luciferian-Satanism" would only replace one monotheist religion
worshipping "God" as "good" with the opposite religion worshipping "Satan" as "evil,"
but would not be able to free the mind from belief in the un-real "existence" of the
monotheist ideal of "God" itself. Thus, "Illuminst Luciferian-Satanism" is not an
elevation in levels from the real toward the ideal, but a decent from the levels of
reality into those of an equally imaginary and false ideal. Both of these paths lead
knowingly to insanity. In short, because "Illuminst Luciferian-Satanism" is no
different from "Judeao-Christian Islam" insofar as both are monotheisms, then
"Judeao-Christian Islam" is no better nor more truly ideal than "Illuminist
Luciferian-Satanism." To see this fact is the origin for seeking freedom from all
belief. Ultimately, all beliefs, not only in EITHER "good" OR "evil," are false. The sky is
NOT "blue," even if we Believe it IS. "Blue" is only a word our species invented to
describe the concept of a colour that pre-existed us. It is meaningless to say that
which preceded is like that which followed. It would, logically, be like saying "if B
therefore A."

People will continue to believe in God long after they reach the logical conclusion
one cannot really exist. Because logic is an arbitrary proof for morality, they will
continue to use logic as a proof for the untrue "existence" of God. Again, this is
identical to saying "because we say the sky is blue, it is blue," when in truth the sky
is thin, clear water. And, again, the more we persist in using logic to justify morality,
using the "Bible" as proof for God, and using books as proof for the past, we will only
deplete the existence of logic, the efficacy of the "Bible," and all other books. This is a
very dangerous road to pursue for us as a species, but then again, we are all doomed
to die anyway, so who cares?

conclusion:

Reality is malleable, but ideals are not. Ideals, by necessity, must outlast all symbols
used for them. This is a natural fact, and not an axiomatic law we impose onto nature
by our logic. There is no "law" in nature, and that is why we, and all other species on
this planet, are permitted to wage war and to profit by killing. We would very much
like to impose a "natural" law to prevent this behaviour, but it is not possible in true
reality to do so. We can no more change natural fact than we alter an ideal. Our mind
is detached from reality like oil on water, but as lovely the patterns of our mind may
be, they are nothing beside the depths of the realm of reality below. No "law" we
imagine can change reality.

Because we exist in reality, though our minds do not, we think we are able to
superimpose our minds onto reality by creating symbolic "meta-objects" from solid
materials. This is a lie. Because we see symbols of ideals, we believe ideals exist as
proven material objects in reality. This is a lie. Because we use and believe in
symbols, we think ideals are real. This is a lie. All logic and morality are lies, but we
will never stop believing in them until our species is extinct. There is no more point
in valueing freedom from belief than there is in valueing death over life. Belief is a
fact of the mental realm just as solid objects are facts in material reality. We cannot
separate the mind and its beliefs. To try is suicide. Beliefs are the organs of the mind,
just as are the organs in our bodies necessary to keep our brains alive. The mind
cannot live without belief anymore than the brain could live without the body. Just
as we consume food to process through our stomach and feed our bodily organs, we
consume ideas with the mind to digest in our brains and feed the beliefs in our
mental realm. The mind can be compared to the body, but not the other way around,
because the body exists in material reality, whereas the mind does not. You can
change a belief in specific, but you cannot remove one organ and replace it with
another that is a different kind. You can believe in both "good" and "evil," but you
cannot sacrifice one heart to make room for a second stomach.

prediction:

Death comes to all of us, and how we live our lives does not matter if history is
arbitrary and beyond our control. So long as we continue to be alive however, we will
cling to beliefs and lies of logical morality to falsey prove "God." No amount of logic
can disprove the use of logic, nor can gasoline extinguish a fire. Thus, we will keep
believing because our species is weak-minded and soft, our beliefs malleable and
inconstant, and ignore the fact of reality that our ideals can never possibly exist in
reality. We will believe as a species until we are extinct, and never succeed in
proving our beliefs are true. That is the fate of our species. There is no hope for us to
progress beyond binary morality, even though it is ultimately useless to us, and will
only bring about our downfall.

topic: Illuminism 101C

title: Illuminist Luciferian-Satanism and You.
author: Jonathan Barlow Gee
organisation: the Pythagorean Order of Death (POD)
location: Tallahassee, Florida, USA
date: 4-27-2012

synopsis:

Why is it widely believed in modern mono-theism that "Satan" is to "Lucifer" what

"God" is to "Christ"? It is due to the lie of "Illuminism" fostering the false assertion
that "Christ" is the "Son" of "God" and thus that the "Anti-Christ" or "Lucifer" is
likewise the "Son" of "Satan." Nevermind that, in the myths, "Lucifer" preceded
"Satan" as a fallen-angel, and that these two were merely different names for one
and the same conceptual entity. The conventional colloquial consensus today is that
"Anti-Christ" is to "Satan" as "Christ" is to "God," and thus just as "Chirst" is the "Son of
God," "Anti-Christ" must also be the "Son of Satan," and that "Lucifer" is the "Anti-
Christ." Lucifer was once the "Angel of Light" and chief among the host of God's
angels. He was said to have rebelled against God on a number of occassions and thus
to have been "cast down" from heaven into, ultimately, the role of "Satan" as the
"Anti-God," ruler of "hell" as "God" rules over "heaven." However by now, the myth
has been distorted such that "Lucifer" would be seen, not as the predecessor, but as
the heir of "Satan."

Of course, as proven in the previous sections of this essay series, no "morality"

defining any of these characters can cause them to exist in reality, which they do
not, nor ever will, nor even can. Nonetheless, this moot argument remains a
distraction in the minds of most monotheists of our species because they are aware,
though only indirectly, of the cognitive dissonant form of their belief. As the
concept of the "monotheist God" begins to shift toward seeking new, real proofs it and
away from the blind belief of the past, the mythological logic defining the
"monotheist God" will decompose and decohere from within, until the definitions of
"God" and "Satan" become interchangeble, and both are finally accepted as false. The
realisation that "God is dead," or rather, a false idea, can be apprehended by any
individual at any time, but will never be realised by our whole species at once. We
will be extinct long before the beliefs we hold now will cease being argued about by
our ancestor species.

This section of this essay series will address the question of "why illuminism has
grown within monotheism as a counter-movement to its religions," as well as "why
illuminism uses the tactic of distorting the logic of monotheist myths," particularly,
as will be further elaborately shown, because there was no "Christ" as a "Son" of
"God," not only because there is no "God," but because the myth of the "Messiah" or
"Christ" being born as Jesus of Nazareth is fiction. The concept of calling "Satan" the
father of "Lucifer" is to perpetuate the myth of "Satan's" inevitable redemption and
return to his original place in "heaven" as the "Angel of Light." The reason for
distorting the monotheist myth towards this concept of "Satan" as the "father" of
"Lucifer" is also meant to address the concept that "evil" is "life backwards," and to
address the concept that what we see as "good" would be "evil," and what we see as
"evil" would be "good," from the point of view of "Satan," if "Satan" were looking at
things from the opposite point of view as "God," and "God's" point of view on our life
was from the "Most High" vantage-point of "heaven," while "Satan's" was the lowest
shadow in the valley of "hell."

introduction:

What is "Good," in general? "Good" is something we aspire to, but will never fully
reach, apprehend and possess. "Good" is, like any other idea, invisible, intangible and
able to influence the minds of people toward belief in it as ideal. As we have sought to
demonstrate in the preceding essay sections of this lecture series, "good" and "evil"
are relative only in the mental realm, and do not exist as solid objects in material
reality. Therefore, what is the "good" of perpetuating the myths that describe them as
such? If our beliefs are based on myths about morality, as they, for most modern
monotheists, undoubtedly exclusively are, then freedom from them would amount to a
mental death, the erasure of all ideas we have ingested into our minds over our entire
lives. Thus, if the keeping of moral myths itself is immoral, but freedom from belief
in their morality brings about a form of mental suicide, can we separate the morality
from the myth, discarding the myth but keeping the morality intact, in such a way as
to avoid complete mental chaos? Logically, this should be the next step for our (or
any subsequent) species: to disentangle the usefullness of our species "logical
morality" from the "monotheist myths" in which it is currently, exclusively, housed.
The "religion" that should be born from "monotheism" as "monotheism" was from
"pantheism" should espouse the morality of reality, and seek proofs for morality in
reality, avoiding the short-cut of believing in it as an ideal that can exist only in the
mind.

If there is no such thing as "good" or "evil," or "right" and "wrong," nothing we can
imagine would be impossible to accomplish, nor nothing we could achieve be
permanent, and eventually, regardless of our personal quest for some proof for our
belief as a species in morality being real, our species will die in a war and our
morality be reduced to its final form: ashes on the pyre of time. Ultimately, even if
"good" and "evil" do exist as ideas in our species' minds now, once our species has
fought over their definitions until we have gone extinct in wars within ourselves,
they will die too. In the end, our species is worthless and far too distracted from
achieving any more of its full potential by the argument over the existence of non-
existent "idealism" and false-truths of "morality." This argument will, eventually, kill
us all. That fact is built into the narrative of the monotheist myths in the form of the
self-fulfilling prophecy of "Revelations" that describes the "end times" of our species
as occuring due to a "war in heaven" between "Jesus Chirst" and "Lucifer" the "Anti-
Christ" over the very topic we're discussing now, the issue of "good" and "evil."

What "good" are the monotheist myths at proving the reality of morality? None;
therefore, they are, themselves, useless, since that is their sole and only goal as a
tool. What "good" can be learned from their study, then? None as well, considering
they only confuse the mind in the present which would be better guided by its moral
instincts. So, then, most importantly, if no "good" comes from the monotheist myths,
why do they continue to exist, why do people continue to study them and believe in
their good? It is because of how ancient true "illuminism" really is. The "new
testament gospels" describing "Jesus Christ" are "illuminist" scriptures inserted
between the partial truths of the "old testament torah" histories and the more or less
total truth of the "Quran" as a moral code-book. The goal of the "Christian" scriptures
was to distill from the Judeaic "Old Testament" scriptures the moral code of the
monotheist God into a short-format, which could then be distilled further until it
evaporates and is replaced by the "scientific method."
The goal of "illuminism" is to replace monotheist religion with science. That much is
the agreed upon definition for "illuminism," however the antiquity of age such a
broadly scoped definiton can encompass is rarely fully examined, and all too often
entirely overlooked in the study of "illuminsm." Assuming the "enlightenment"-era
resurgeance of "neo-Platonism" and the invention of the "scientific method" during
the "age of reason" were the origin for modern "illuminism" is fine; however we
must not forget that prior to this, "illuminism" had been thought dead since the last
prior resurgeance of interest in "Platonism," immediately prior to the era of the
"New Testament," when the ideas of Plato were originally being dispersed among the
various peoples of the Roman Imperial collonies. The result of "Platonic philosophy"
on "mono-theism" then was called "Gnosticism" in the Meditteranean regions of
northern Africa and the middle-east. "Gnosticism" was the "study of knowledge," just
as "philosophy" was the "pursuit of wisdom." Insofar as Gnostics considered "wisdom"
an unattainable ideal, hidden in our mind behind a veil of our knowledge, they
sought to prove the reality of knowledge as a means of acquiring the ideal of wisdom.
To monotheism, such thought is heresy. To "illuminism," the fact monotheist religion
finds "philosophy" and "Gnosticism" antithetical to faith and belief is proof for their
own origins at the now eroding core of monotheism itself. The fact monotheist
religions define faith and belief as "good" and science and knowledge as "evil" is the
sickness of "illuminism" within monotheist religion. Of course, no "good" God would
curse the quest for knowledge, which is why it was necessary for "illuminism" to be
created by pantheism within the monotheist religion to do that job instead.

terminology:

Judeao-Christian Islam IS illuminist Luciferian-Satanism. They are two sides of one

coin. Likewise, science and logic are one side of the same coin as the other side is
belief in morality. Because "Judeao-Christian Islam" breaks down into the dialectic of
the "Trinity" of "father" God, "son" Christ, and "holy ghost" Prophet, each of these
components has its mirror opposite on the same level in the form of the "father"
Satan, the "son" Lucifer" and the "holy ghost" of "illuminism" in the opposite form of
monotheist religion, which seeks to find (or to cause) proof in reality for the
existence of "evil" rather than of "good." Because Judeaism created "God" and "Satan,"
Christianity created "Christ" and "Lucifer," and Islam created "the Prophet (PBUH)"
and "illuminism," they are both "monotheisms," even though opposite in their
moralities; both "God" and "Satan" are just opposite sides of the same concept -
monotheism.

"Gnostic" monotheism created the "scientific method" as "Platonic philosophy,"

however immediately following this pantheist infiltrators of monotheist religion at
the time implemented the "illuminist" counter-trend as a means of suprpessing this
methodology and its goals. "Luciferian-Satanism" was invented to discredit
gnosticism and science as being the very trend of "illuminism" which was, within
monotheism, designed to stamp them out. Thus, in the modern mind, the concepts of
"scientific method" and "logical reasoning" are believed to be associated with
"illuminism" and with the goal of proving the existence of "Satan" and non-existence
of "God" in natural reality.

Therefore, "Gnosticism" and "Platonic philosophy," even if identified as "illuminsm,"

are truer forms of "monotheism" than the form of "illuminism" originally designed
to suppress and thwart them by pantheist infiltrators. Who, then, were these
infiltrators into monotheist religion who still held the old beliefs of pantheism from
ancient times? What was their fiendish scheme to slander scientific method and
monotheist gnostic philosophy as "illuminism"? The answer is quite simple, though
may shock many modern mono-theists today: it was the Roman Emperors who
invented "Christianity" to counter the spread of the "Gnostic" heresy. This fact,
though obvious, is yet counter-intuitive today only because so many people today are
believers in the "Christian New Testament Gospels" as being part of the "Bible" and
thus the "true word of God." They are not. Everyone, be they Eastern-Orthodox,
Catholic or Protestant, who calls themselves a "Christian" nowadays is a fool being
mis-led by a false fiction. There never was any "Christ" born because the concept of
"Christ" is a fictional concept based on the idea of the "son" of "God," which is, in
turn, completely antithetical to the definition of "God" in monotheism as the sole and
only deity above all that which is, was and ever will be. This concept had become so
unpopular at the time of the writings of the "New Testament Gospels," that the Roman
Emperors wrote these "Gospels" to prove the myth was an Absolute Truth in material
factual reality. The "Gospels" are a lie, and the events described in them did not
actually occur in at all the way described in them.

While "Judeaism" proved the existence as ideal, but the limitation to the mental realm,
of the monotheist "God," and "Islam" proved the usefullness of extracting only the
moral axioms from within the "Old Testament's" many mythical truisms,
"Christianity" has proved to be the downfall of all monotheist religion as such. It
demands we question the definition of and what constitutes a modern "religion,"
because if one "religion" can be predicated on a false myth, then any church can
arise anywhere at any time around any myth, regardless of its moral "good" or its
percentage of fiction, and be considered an authentically "monotheist" religion as
well. Thus, "Christianity" IS "Luciferian-Satanism," and both combined are
"illuminism," or the erosion of monotheism from within.

methodology:

Ignoring the emotional temptation to cling to symbols of morality as justification for

our belief in its existence and as cause for obeying its codes in our behaviours cannot
itself cause the non-existence or reversal of our previously held moral beliefs. Thus,
science, by the method of questioning, can not replace the monotheist concept of
God, but only expand upon its definition by empowering Him as the one being asked.
"Illuminism" on the other hand is predicated on disproving the existence of the
monotheist concept of "God" by any terms, and by any means, including use of
science and of monotheist myths themselves. "Illuminism" as anti-thesis of
"Gnosticism" combines science and myth to disprove monotheism, while "Gnosticism"
uses science and myth to prove it. The goal of Gnosticism was culminated in the
Quran, distilling only the most important moral truisms from within the previous
monotheist scriptures, and thus the Quran became the basic text for the original
practitioners of scientific method in the early Muslim Ottoman Empire. The goal of
the Quran and the scientific method was to prommote free thought and for people to
question their belief in the false monotheism of Christianity. The Gnostics hoped
that, by inventing the new religion of Islam, they would be able to turn the blind
followers away from being misled by the lies of pantheistic Christianity. "Gnosticism"
became "Islam." In the Ottoman Empire and Turkish Spain science was practised
openly during the entire Medieval period during which the Roman Pope of
Christendom commited the atrocities of the Crusades and Inquisition, while ruling
over the European feudal system of royals, vassals and their serfs. As stated before,
the "Dark Ages" stagnated Europe in their backwards rejection of modern science,
forcing the nomadic tribespeople of pre-Roman Europe into the Indo-European
caste-system of pre-Hindu Vedic India. Such was the history of "western civilisation"
in Christian Europe between the advent of their "monotheist" religion's invention
until the early years of the Italian Rennaissance some 1600 years later. In truth, the
"monotheist" religion of Christianity is nothing but a glove into which the pantheist
Roman Empire was perfectly fit alike a hand.

The concept of "Christ" was based loosely on the deity "Krishna" of the Hindu and
Veda. "Krishna" was the "oversoul" or "uber-mensch," the "super-ego" or "Most High
consciousness." In the Vedic pantheist myths, "Krishna" is described as a dancing,
though unborn infant, asleep in a meta-versal cosmic womb, and our entire cosmos,
all we can see and know about material reality, is nothing but his dream. In Hindu
myths, "Krishna" became an intermediary between "Shiva" the destroyer and
"Vishnu" the creator. In Buddhism, "Krishna" was the avatar of Buddha, and Buddha
the atavism of Krishna, just as each subsequent Dalai Lama has been an atavism of
Buddha. When the indo-Europeans immigrated across the Caucus mountains from
western Asia into eastern Europe, they brought with them "Krishna" among their
pantheon of many other Gods. When Rome invaded and subjugated these peoples of
Europe, the pantheon of Rome identified the Indo-European pantheist demi-deity
"Krist" with the concept of the Hebrew "Messiah," or "messenger of God," called in
Greek "Christ," the world-saviour. Because the Roman Empire encountered far more
resistence from the Hebrew Judeans in the middle-eastern collonies than from the
pantheists of Europe, they thought it wise to take the character attributes of
"Krishna" or "Krist" and assign them all to one Hebrew person whom they would
then call the "Messiah" or "Christ," and then kill, and thus dispell the myth of a
coming "world saviour" who could overthrow the Roman Empire. And so they wrote
the "New Testament Gospels."

history:

The concept of the "devil" predates the myth of "Satan" as a fallen angel. In the oldest
original Torah myths, there is no description of "Satan" entering into the "serpent of
Eden," of "Satan" testing Job, of "Satan" being a "fallen angel," etc. Instead, each of
these roles was played by a different angel of God. Firstly, the "serpent of Eden" is
described as being the angel Raziel. Secondly, the "adversary" who tests Job is Azriel.
Thirdly, the "fallen angel" of Hebrew Pass-over is celebrated as the scape-goat, whose
name is Samael or Shem-Azza, meaning "the name Azza." All of these were taken,
collectively, to represent one single angel by the New Testament era anti-Gnostic
monotheism pantheist scholars of Rome. They called this anti-God "Satan," and
described him as having once been an "angel of light," named "Lucifer" who
challenged the authority of God, and whom God "cast down" into "hell" and made king
demon. Of course, this myth is entirely contrived by assuming the differently named
angels of the Old Testament Torah are one and the same fallen-angelic entity, rather
than separate angels tasked individually by God. In Gnosticism, "Satan" was called
"Saklas," "Sabaoth" or "Ialdabaoth" which meant "the blind one." They were not
refering to any real living being. They were refering to the early Roman invention
of "Christ" being based on the myths of Horus and Odin, both of whom lost one of
their eyes fighting the serpent of chaos. The Gnostics knew the idea of "Christ" was
false. They spit on the graven idol of the Christian world-saviour, and have often
since the Inquisition resorted to violently replicating the fictional act of the killing
by curcifiction of this fictional Christ. To the Gnostics, "Satan" was a rebel against
"God," and because "Satan" was an invention of Roman pantheists, which they called
"Christ," thus "Christ" was "Satan." It was Christ that was, thus, the rebel against God,
and whose character is often portrayed by Gnostics as an anti-hero. Again, the whole
purpose of inventing the myth of "Christ" and thus the "monotheist" religion of
Christianity was as "illuminism" meant to logically discredit and morally erode
monotheism from within.
The writing of the "New Testament" was meant to end the relgious writings of
monotheism. It failed. Islam proves that the idea of God (somehow!) managed to
survive the fictional death of "Christ," His "son." The galvanised format of Islam in
the short-form of its scripture, the Quran, came as a surprise to and was immediately
seen as a threat by the Roman Christian Papal-Emperors. The Roman Popes of the era
of Muhammad (PBUH) believed themselves the contemporary equivalent of the
ancient Egyptian Pharaohs. They believed they held the keys to heaven and hell, and
that they alone controlled the entire vast of expanse of the former Roman Empire,
which had included Judea and much of the middle-east.

The origin of Islam was seen as an enourmous threat to their consolidation of power,
and thus they launched the "Crusades" to retake the "Holy Lands" from the "hethen"
Muslim Semites. Of course, by attacking the monotheist religion of Islam, Christianity
finally disproved itself as a monotheist religion itself, and lost all remains of its thin
veil over the naked face of Imperial Roman pantheism. However, the Popes,
remaining impervious in their belief of their own immortal authority as
contemporary equivalents of Caesar alike the Egyptian Pharaohs, did not even care
by then. They unleashed wave after wave of children, of nuns, of serfs and of
knighted vassals led (sometimes) by the loyal kings themselves, against the Muslim
Saraccen and Ottoman Turks.

The result was that the followers of Islam were split into two schools, the so-called
"Sevener" or "Shiite" believers, and the "Twelver" or "Sunni" believers. To this day
there remains un-necessary conflict within the last true monotheist religion to
form, Islam, between those who believe in 7 and those who believe in 12 Imams, or
wise teachers who followed the Last Prophet, Muhammad (PBUH). The backlash of the
Crusades causing the split in Islam was that eventually the Catholic Empire of
Christendom split also, and formed the Protestant faith as a form of Gnostic rebellion
against Christianity as a religion of Imperialism. Just as Islam remains at civil war
within itself to this day, Christendom was eventually split into three pieces that all
remain today: Eastern Orthodox, Roman Catholic and Protestant.!All of these sects are
considered different religions now, and all have adherents all around the world,
numbering in total nearly the entire population of n.Asia and of "western
civlisation" combined. The only equivalent to any form of competing religion besides
the adherents of Judeao-Christian Islam are the Hindi pantheists of India and the
followers of the non-religion philosophy of Buddhism.

Because there are over 7 billion or so people alive on earth right now, and because
according to sruveys by "western civilised" science, at least 90% of everyone alive
believes in the concept of the monotheist God, that means that 6.3 billion people alive
right now believe in God. The rest of the people alive right now are either "agnostic"
- aware of the idea of God but unwilling to accept it as true without any factual proof,
or "atheist" - who are aware of the idea of God and who outright reject the validity of
the concept in any terms.!Becasue only one percent of the ten percent who doubt the
truth of the existence of God are atheists who deny the idea entirely, and because one
percent of ten percent is actually one-tenth of one percent of the total, and because
the total population alive now is around 7 billion, thus only about 1/10 of 1% of 7
billion people are outright atheists. This means that 6.3 billion people believe in God,
that 7 million people are either agnostic or atheist, and that there are only about 700
real atheists.!This might seem like an incredibly small number of people nowadays,
considering there's 7 billion people alive now. 700 people would not even fill an
average sized stadium in modern times. Yet this group grows even smaller when we
subtract from it those atheists who believe in the "ideal good" of "morality"
independently of the existence or non existence of the idea of God. If we are left with
only the number of "atheists" who are also "amoral" or who would be considered
truly "godless" and "evil" people by the rest of humanity, we are left with something
like merely 70 living souls. 70 out of 7 billion human beings are both atheist and
choose to be evil. That's 0.0049% of the total, or literally one evil atheist per every 100
million people both morally good and who believe in God.

These ~70 people who are both atheist and amoral sociopaths have self-selected into
behind the scenes managereal roles in our increasingly globalised society. They
have collected to their cause around the same number of amoral agnostics and
immoral monotheists by professing the "new religion" of "science" to replace
monotheism. We call this group now, the "illuminati," although this name only began
being used for this cult as recently as the enlightenment and dawn of the age of
reason. This form of anti-monotheist non-pantheist atheism is much older than the
name "illuminati" however, and dates at least as far back as the Roman Empire. The
Roman Emperors, self-proclaimed pantheists and monotheists alike, believed
themselves alike the ancient Egyptian Pharaohs, who had believed themselves to be
"living Gods." This contradictory concept defies the principle of God as an ideal-only,
and is the foundation-stone on which Christianity was based. Christianity was
founded to set a precident for the punishment and execution of anyone from the
"gross masses" (the some 99.9% of good agnostics or monotheists) who attempts to
gain social power non-economically, by providing an ideal good in the form of a
non-economic message of morality. Because "Jesus Christ" was "good," he was killed
by those "evil" people who rule the world, and continue to today. Thus, if anyone else
wants to come along nowadays and try to be a "world-saviour," they will meet with
the same fate as any and all "Christs," the fate that is deserved instead by those evil
rulers who would expand their empires by violence, monetary corecion and lies.
Thus, we seem now to be stuck with these ~70 rulers of the world, although this sum is
inconstant in itself, and varies as a percentage of the total population.

As stated, these ~70 "global kings" are all in agreement on the most fundamental
issues, and all in opposition to the vast majority of opinions on them. They do not
believe in God, and they do not subscribe to any moral code. They believe themselves
to be "living Gods," and wish only to expand their authority over distant minds. They
will die unhappy, unsatisfied, and suffer the fate of hell in their final moment's
thoughts. Some of them are intelligent enough to realise this, however not all of
them are, nor do all of those who realise it choose to care about it and repent.

evaluation:

Because the modern "illuminists" have, for 2000 years since their forging "Christian
monotheism," a complete contradiction in terminology, consolidated so much power
to their small, elite cabal, it seems as though they have impugnity to do whatever
they want, including commiting mass-murder and arbitrary torture of individual
enemies. Because these "illuminists" do not believe in the monotheist concept of
"God," but believe instead they themselves are "living Gods," they comprise a false
"pantheon" of modern "anti-Gods," essentially embodying on earth the demonic
royalty of "hell" as a "round table" of plural, equal "Satans." Thus, by their existence,
they prove the theory of "hell on earth" and that "Satan rules earth." However, these
truisms do not prove necessarily universable axioms; the rich elite are not always
evil atheists in all events, even though they are here and now.

Because the rich elite cabal of atheist sociopaths that manage the global
governmental "round tables" and "think tanks" now do not all agree on every issue,
we, the rest of the population of people on this planet, can only hope this tightly knit
elite cabal is susceptible to erosion and decomposition from within due to a form of
"anti-illuminist illuminism" forming among their ranks. We, the majority of moral
monotheists of our species, believe the rich elite's "new world order" to be a house of
cards that can be toppled by the slightest breeze blown through it from within. This
hope, however we may reason it a logical moral axiom, is irrelevant without our
preparing for and around it. If this elite cabal falls, we must have a back-up system
prepared to be implimented instead of it immediately on its collapse. Until we have a
superior alternative option to their "Protocol's" global dictatorship, their plan will
continue to progress, and the doom of our species to creep incrementally closer
everyday.

In material reality, we must remember, there are no such solid objects as factual
evidence to prove the existence of "right" or "wrong." Therefore, the actions of the
modern "illuminists" are allowed by nature to occur, and they are permitted to profit
from mass murder, torture and various war-crimes. They use the scriptures of
Christianity, particularly the prophecies such as Revelations and the works of
Nostradamus, to plant certain symbols into mass media, to preclude our minds toward
expecting, and to count-down to, events they have been planning for centuries
finally coming to pass. This group of immoral atheists has no official title as a cabal,
nor any official name for their philosophy. They change their tactics and strategies
to prevent others coming to success the same way they had. They "change the rules
mid-game," and use economic shock-tests to destabilise international currency
markets and to "tilt the board" in their favour; they make legal for themselves any
active deeds they can imagine themselves benefitting from, then make it illegal for
anyone else to exploit these same legal loop-holes. They authorise torture of "enemies
of the state" while staging false-flag "terrorist" attacks against their own nation of
origin. These are the things that the "leaders" of the "free world" do on a daily basis.

conclusion:

Following any extensive study of the topic of "illuminism" as pantheist infiltrator-

originating anti-monotheism in the form of "Christianity" itself one can find one's
self quite exhausted and wanting to find any moral truth to it all. There is no
justification in moral logic for the ritual sacrifice of human beings, their use as
disposable sex-slaves, and the trade of abducted children world-wide, let alone the
outright illegal declarations of war made "legal" by recent presidents. The cult of
fame, of fortune, of wealth, of success and celebrity surrounding this group of fiat-
capitalist war-mongers is in its core membership comprised solely of immoral
atheists. The best manner to rid the world of this group of people is not to stoop to
their level and execute them following mock-trials; the best manner is to rid the
world of any belief in the need for this group to control and orchestrate events on a
global level. This can only be accomplished by developing a fall-back option in the
(inevitable) event their plan as laid out in the "Protocols" for a global dictator fails.
Evenetually their system will fail because it benefits nobody else but themselves; the
remainder of the population will simply cease seeing any "good" use in this group,
and freely ignore all attempts to enforce its demands. Eventually, all the prior fiat-
capitalists will be forced to adopt whatever the populist "fall-back plan" ends up
being, however, if we wish to keep "capitalism" without the negative results of "fiat"
we can simply replace paper cash with gold coins. This would benefit us all, rich and
poor, equally.

prediction:
Ultimately, all the rats will leave the sinking ship not because they want to, but
because they have no other choice. It is only a matter of time before the entire
population of people on this planet will have to decide between either the "good" of
those whose imaginary "wealth" we consider "success," or else the good of themselves
as the rest alive. To prepare for a world without this group of people being in control
of the major industries, we must acceleate development of any form of alternative
plan besides their "Protocols" for a global dictatorship. Without a prepared "plan B"
ready to impliment, the globalists edge closer daily to their dream of appointing
Prince Harry the "Christ."

topic: Illuminism 101D

title: the Future for Illuminist Luciferian-Satanism
author: Jonathan Barlow Gee
organisation: the Pythagorean Order of Death (POD)
location: Tallahassee, Florida, USA
date: 5-1-2012

synopsis:

If we establish that logic and morality are not realities, but our own mental choice in
each moment, we will have successfully applied "illuminism" to erode the
foundations for the existence of monotheist religion. Monotheism, unlike pantheism,
constitutes a single ediface of institutionalised religion. There are many synagogues,
denominational churches and mosques. But there is only One monotheist God, and if
we disprove the necessary existence of this, by removing "moral logic" as an
argument for mental imagination being counted as part of solid, material reality,
then not one, not some nor many, but ALL monotheist religious insitutions fall. That,
in short, accomplishes the goal of so-called "Illuminism," foundation of the Roman
flamine "Catholic" Christian religion. The role of the Popes has been, all along, to
prove the non-existence of God, as part of their pledge to uphold the will of "Christ"
for "His Church," for the existence of "Christ" as a "Son of God" (let alone a "Church"
to embody the "Holy Ghost" to complete the Catholic "Trinity") disproves the concept
of a singular monotheist God. "Illuminism" is the true form of "Christianity," insofar
as both seek to disprove the existence of God and thus to topple the monotheist
religion by eroding its insitutions. If we establish, further, that this is and has been
the goal of a small group of less than 100 immoral atheists alive at any time - the so-
called "illuminist conspiracy," a literal embodiment of the illuminist concept of a
"Synagogue of Satan" - then we may posit they themselves might not believe in
"Satan," but that, by their actively evil deeds, they are willing to deliver mankind
into the total self-destruction and moral-abnegation that is implied as the opposite of
monotheism. Thus, whether or not they themselves are "Luciferian Satanists," per se,
is irrelevant beside the fact they are, even now as I am writing these words,
attempting to consolidate to themselves the power over masses of their equals once
possesed by Pharaohs and Caesars. This group of immoral atheists is aligning
themselves, using fiat capitalism rather than production of a commodity or service,
to rule over the rest of our species by replacing the concept of monotheism with
their own appointment of a global dictator. This dictator, regardless of whether
considered "good" or "evil" by arbitrary moral logic, would be, to the illuminist
"religion," the equivalent of "God" to monotheism; thus, "Christ" would be replaced by
"Lucifer," and "God" by a living global dictator as "Satan," the true ruler over earth.

introduction:

The better question than "what is good?" is "what is relativity?" To understand that
what is "good for one" is not the same as what is "good for another," let alone what
would be "best for all," one must first understand that no matter to what one assigns
attributes of "good" or "evil," one cannot have one without the other; thus, no matter
how much "good" or "evil" there is in the universe, because these concepts are ex
post facto effects of physical reality and because these concepts are "relative" to one
another - thus we can postulate that, not only is everything in physical reality
relative to everything else in all quantities of any quality, but perhaps, because
"good" and "evil" are also relative, but are ideals, then everything in the mental
realm might be "relative" as well. Thus, "relativity" would be a common denominator
of both physical, material reality and our super-imposed mental idealisms. So, we can
begin by the postulate: "EVERYTHING IS RELATIVE," and expand on this to prove or
disprove it by comparing the relativities between reality and ideals.

Solid material reality and the realm of mental ideals are relative to one another.
"Good" and "evil" are relative to one another, in the realm of mental idealism, thus
the same way as are apples and oranges in material reality. You can compare
quantities of apples and oranges, contrast their qualities, etc. You can use them to
symbolise units of "good" or "evil" karma if you like. However, ultimately, as real as
the apples and oranges are, "good" and "evil" are only ideals. You can compare and
contrast apples and oranges on the level of material reality, alike how you can "good"
and "evil" in the mind, but this does not make the mental realm real, only "relative"
to reality. For example, say the apple is alike the idea of "evil," and the orange alike
the idea of "good." This actually subtracts from the real value of the apple and orange
both, dividing their real use into a part that is super-imposed mental ideal. This
implication of positive value disguising an actual deficiet in real worth is the sole
promise of the mental realm of ideal. Because reality pre-exists the mind, as solid
matter pre-existed the evolution of biological life, the real value is in the solid
material object itself, and not in the super-imposed mental ideals we project onto it
with our minds.

Once we realise that the mind is the pivotal fulcrum point, the bottle-necking hour-
glass between the apex of idealism and nadir or reality, its actual use is defined: not as
a mental-projector that shines idealist-light through a focal-lens at a blank-wall of
external-reality to show a motion-picture, a shadow-puppet show; the mind is used to
absorb matter into it and to convert it into the mental realm - the mind exists to
create new ideals. When was the last time a "new ideal" was imagined? How long has
it been considered dangerous to use our full imaginations? How long has it been
tacitly illegal to dream aloud?

terminology:

In the previous essays we defined morality as a subjective variable. It exists only in

the realm of the mind as an ideal, but cannot effectively be super-imposed onto
reality in such a way as to benefit anything by it doing so. Morality is, thus, a failed
ideal. "Realism" arises to replace failed ideals, and from its scythe now drips the blood
of "logical positivism," the concept - futily optimistic - that morality can be proven
using a series of events in reality over time. Using cause and effect to prove the
natural existence of an otherwise inert force upon matter is a self-fulfilling
prophecy. You cannot pick up a club of wood and kill a person who disagrees with
you just to prove to them that solid material reality agrees with you even if they
personally do not. They will miss your point, being as how they will be dead. You can
prove the existence of material reality this way, at least to yourself, but you cannot
prove the supremacy to it of the mental realm of ideals through any active deed you
can imagine, let alone perform in reality. Just as there is no actual "karmic unit" of
"good" or "evil" anywhere in material reality, so too can no active deed prove their
existence through cause and effect. Ideas don't exist; ideals are not reality.

If we define morality as an ideal, but define ideals as relative to reality, we can

further identify morality as a failed ideal. If this is the case, as it appears it is - for
morality promising balance offers none in fact - then what "higher ideal" should
replace morality? If "illuminism" disproves "monotheism" as an ideal itself, and if
mono-theism is the singular pinnacle capable of topping even the binary dualism of
"good" and "evil," then truly the entire mental realm is in jeapordy of proving a
complete and total waste of time and energy.

Thus, identifying "morality" as a "failed ideal," we begin our final inquiry into the
topic of "illuminist Luciferian-Satanism," to find a true ideal, a "good moral" that we
can identify, that we can share and compare to other real objects, and that can be
substituted for the failed morality of monotheism. If monotheism's anti-thesis for the
"good God" is the "evil Satan," then perhaps the first place we should look for an
answer to the quest for a "higher moral ideal" would be to seek the opposite of what
monotheism has defined it as.

If "good" and "evil" are relative in the way that apples and oranges are, then we may
imagine apples and oranges in a pure empty void, devoid entirely of gravity or other
meanings. They exist, but are without "relative" referentiality to anything else. Such
are the apple and the orange "things in themselves," and so thus are "good" and
"evil" forms of objective "things in themselves." Good and Evil are objects in the
mental vacuum alike apples and oranges would be if they were to be compared while
floating in the depths of outer-space.

Thus, the question of "what is a better ideal than morality" is answered, objectively,
quite simply by the void itself. "NOTHINGNESS is supreme to the monotheist single
deity concept in the mind, as well as to the relativity between moral ideals and objects
in material reality." It is not the addition of the monotheist "God" concept to the
binary dualism of "good" and "evil" to form the "Catholic" dialectic "Trinity" that
solves the answer of a more useful back-drop to the equation at hand. It is the
abnegation of the entire system.

methodology:

Thus, the "law of one" at the capstone of monotheism, built in turn ontop of the
pantheist cornerstone of the "laws of men," itself in turn serves as the cornerstone to
the atheist "law of none," whose capstone is, in turn, an infinite zero. This "law of
none" expressed as "infinite zero" is the solution to the equation of what may better
supercede "morality" as an ideal. Some have expressed it as "anarchy" or the "law" of
"do what thou wilt," expressed in Greek as "Thelema." This "one law of no laws" has
been the sole belief adhered to by the immoral atheists who invented "illuminist
Luciferian-Satanism" as a counter-point to "Judeao-Christian-Muslim" monotheism.

The usefullness of "infinite zero" is simple and limitless: behind everything, there is
nothingness. It is the furthest limit we have or ever can reach, providing zero
resistance and an infinitely retreating horizon, incrementally acquiescing to our
advancements along our borders of knowledge and greed. Nature, itself, is seen as
being the ultimate drawing board upon which we have traced out our structures of
"morality" as idealised castles in the sands of time. Nature, which returns all to its
most basic elements given enough time, is said to obey no higher laws, but to be the
very mechanism by which its own, interior, "natural laws" are enforced. Whenever
we see a coincidence occur, we imagine it brief proof of a higher guiding ideal,
however this ocassional glimpses into our own imaginations made real in truth
disprove just that. Nature's femininity, for example, implies to mankinds' minds the
existence of some counter-point masculine force. We imagine "God the father," or
"father time," etc. never realising that it is we ourselves who are filling that role and
playing that part ourselves by doing so.

Thus, the only more effective solution than applying "infinite zero" to our own
limitations by "natural law" is applying it to the existence of reality itself. Just as the
mental realm of ideals may be disproven using objective realism, so too can the realm
of material reality be disproven to exist using solipsism. "Solopsism" is the ontology
of the same philosophy that "nihilism" is the religious moral code. Again, immoral
atheists have embraced these both since, perhaps, before the origin of our own
species.

history:

If the "law of none" preceded the existence of the "law of one," the discovery of the
monotheist ideal of a "one true god," then how can best hope to return the world to
this simpler, more idyllic stage of a veritable "Garden of Eden," a natural paradise on
earth? We cannot. We have progressed down a long, dead-end path from which there
is no, nor can there be any, return. Our species is as much doomed to extinction prior
to our exhausting our futile clinging to the useless monotheist concept of moral logic
as each of us alive now is doomed to die sooner or later someday as well. Thus, there's
no hope for our species, and the best we can hope for is to leave some traces of clues,
some small sampling of evidence, of our present existence to future species that
might one day find and study our remains as today we do the dinosaurs. If we have
any remains of hope at all for moral logic's proving the existence of an ideally "good"
God, it lies with animals and aliens, and not in our own hands anymore.

The world chews us up and spits us out, both as individual people and as a species.
Nature has been abused by us long enough, and is no longer willing to suffer our
species existence. The simple fact is that we have broken "natural law" by super-
imposing our mental "ideals" and thus diminishing the real usefulness of solid
material objects in natural reality. Because of this, we SHOULD abandon absolutely
ALL hope entirely, and simply make due with finding a superior form of idealism in
nihilist, atheist solipsism. However, it is unlikely our species will be capable of
achieving this goal, aside from perhaps less than one hundred of us alive at any
given time in history, and so it falls on these remaining few to suffer the hopeless
and thankless, sad and futile fate of knowing and carrying the burden of our entire
species destiny: death.

When the dead can be cloned, and inanimate flesh made to live again, there can no
longer be the super-imposition of binary dualist moral idealism as a "natural law"
proving the existence of the monotheist concept of "God." This is because cloning, ie.
"resurrecting the dead," is forbidden in scriptures as being the "last straw," so to
speak, in sealing the demise of past species. It is believed that, because the "giants"
cloned our species into existence, for example, the Biblical flood was sent to destroy
them all, and it was only by a sub-atomically narrow margin our own species even
managed to survive it as well. Thus, now that we are at the cusp of this form of a
scientific breakthrough, we are staring down the "last straw" separating our own
species from our prior definition of "God" itself. If we "become God," usually "God"
gets very upset about it, and the result is total global extinction.
Total global extinctions happen frequently and on a regular schedule, corresponding
with one species dominance on a planet and with the peak of that planet's star's
sunspot cycle. The more heat the star bakes the planet in, the more full of hot air are
the minds of whatever is the most advanced species on that planet. The lofty ideals of
long lost species can only nowadays be imagined by examining their fossil remnants.
Reptiles grew larger over the many millennia they evolved as the dominant species
on earth, and thus their form of "logical morality" was to "idealise" size. This was, of
course, their downfall, insofar as when their environmental conditions were
suddenly changed by a comet colliding with earth, they were forced to shrink and to
bio-diversify their families of species. As the earth's global environment changed,
reptiles grew smaller and more agile, and have since adopted many traits developed
during the dinosaur-era first by mammals. As mammals, our own species has small
size and agility, and furthermore, as monkies, our species of mammal further evolved
thumbs and upright walking.

Dinosaurs were a silly species from the point of view of our own. Likewise, our own
species will appear as much a useless and futile dead-end stem on the branching tree
of evolution from a point as far ahead into our own future now as we are now from
the dinosaurs in our past. In the future, dinosaurs will be replaced by dino-hominids,
and it will be our fossilised blood, turned to tar and oil, that will be used as fuel to
power their strange machines.

I am wagering the future will belong to two forms of animal-factions, who will
evolve from the wild and from the tame forms of animals alive at this time now. In
the wild animal faction there are "birds" and "bugs," ever at war as polar extreme
opposites, the "good" and the "evil" of the untamed air. In the tame animal faction
there are "dogs" and "cats," who have achieved peace but who remain divided along
class lines the usefulness of which has expired.

It is easy enough to see all this, if one but lets go of their ego. The ego is the
temporal-lock, the conceptual framework within and behind the physical reality
that surrounds one's living body. Your mind is where and when your body thinks it
is right now only because it is stuck to it like a fly in a spider's cob-web. Until the
body dies, there's no escape for the mind from it. Thus, the mind cannot ever truly
hope to succeed in realising anything it can imagine as an ideal, as in "bringing the
gift of fire" or "drawing down the moon" as it were. Everything we touch is tainted
by our inner-wills, and everything we invent takes on a new life of its own once we
are done creating it. New ideas share themselves, and if you hold onto one too long, it
will no longer be as "good," because someone else will have already tried it by then.

Thus, the best idea is to embrace the futility of all ideals, and to expand upon the
logical amoralism of atheist solipsism. This means that the "ego" or "time-lock" one
has for themselves in their mind, their "self-definition" itself and their faculty
thereof, should be abnegated, and the use of it as a link between the mental and
material realms of ideals or reality be abolished. To accomplish this, one is best to
begin by using logic to reduce morality, then to using this form of reduced morality,
hindered by logic, to disprove the physical existence of "God." There is no "good," no
"evil," no "God" or "Satan," there is only oneself surrounded by their own infnite
cosmos.

Each of us is the core of our own cosmos. We can each try to bring down our ideals
and make them real. But the more we try, the more we will be depleting the top sands
of the hour-glass to add to the sands in the bottom half of it. Call it erosion, drainage,
entropy, decay, Thoth or whatever you like: it is the ruler of the cosmos, and our ego
is only visiting this realm temporarily. If one's own mind could fully expand to
encompass, define and control the entire real cosmos, one would realise they
themselves are the one true God over their own entire universe, of which they are
the core, and which may overlap other core-God's centralised universal spheres as
well. But then, if we are all "Gods," there is no such thing as a "one true God" possible.

Logic is preposterously useless at solving this problem, because if there is no "God,"

there is no logical justification for our own existence, let alone the solely mental
existence of our man-made idealism-machine called "logic." Using logic to disprove
God's existence is exactly like using a gun to shoot off your own toe. Anyone who
pursues this line of reasoning deserves to bleed out.

However, it is apparently necessary for some nowadays to at least TRY to "break the
godspell" that controls their otherwise more creative minds by limiting their "free"
time. People honestly believe as much that there is hope for our species as they do in
the factual existence of "God." It does not matter that no "god" by definition of "alien
biological being" fits the defintion of being the "One True God" over the whole
universe; it only matters that, all else regardless, no such "One True God" over the
whole universe can nor does exist in reality. Thus, it is just as futile to resist the logic
that disproves our own usefulness to an arbitrary and hostile reality as it is to
advocate it. In truth, only solipsism defines the true condition of reality from
anyone's mind's perspective, because such is the same amount of beleif reality has in
the contents of anyone's mind.

God hates human-kind. It is simple to see this fact, as only our own species' minds is
tortured in this way by the issue of mortality. We imagine moral logic and use this
imagined ideal to super-impose the concepts of "good," of "evil," and of "God" and
"Satan." This argument is a waste of our minds and time. In truth, only solipsism is an
accurate description of reality.

Solipsism is the belief, proven in fact, that nothing is real and that nothing real
actually exists. There is simply a vast empty void of outer-space, undistrubed with
any sub-atomic motion by the stirrings of any gravitational breeze. Nothingness
exists, and it is all that exists. We are not "brains on shelves." There are no "shelves."
There are no "brains." There is no "us." There is only nothingness, and we are simply
imagining the rest. The law of gravity is true, as if in a dream, because we imagine it
to be so. The law of entropy and decay over time is true, as if by cause and effect,
because we believe it to be so; we see it occuring here or there, then we imagine it
must always everywhere, and so everything began and continues to decay to this day.
We imagine a "God" and so, for each of us, one exists; but each imagines a different
"God" and so infinite "Gods" CAN exist.

Infinite "Gods" CAN exist only because in truth, NOTHINGNESS ALONE EXISTS.
Logically-moralist nihilism, objective-rational atheism and blind faith in total
solipsism are the three stages of "illuminist Luciferian-Satanism" ascended only by
some 70 or so people per generation. If you can embrace these as "higher ideals"
than "failed morality," you could be among these ruling elites as well, however the
likelihood they would allow anyone new to enter their folds by this point, so close to
our species' planned extinction, is unlikely to the nth degree of extremism.

We will all die. Our bodies will die, and our minds become ghosts. Our species will die
and our ghosts become Gods. This planet will die and our Gods will become souls, free
to roam anywhere in the cosmos and time. This cosmos will die and all our individual
souls will evaporate into the thinner density of the omni-spirit, the monotheist ideal
of "God." That "God" will die, and the cosmos will be reborn "under new management."
Then eventually, the idea of all existence itself will have worn so thread-bare against
the back-drop of a black curtain of Nothingness that it will simply whisp away like
cob-webs in the breezes, becoming another forgotten memory in the schizophrenic
mind of a non-existent God, the ego of the cosmos.

Therefore, there is no "Christ," there is only "illuminism" logically disproving

morality. There is no "God," there is only "Luciferianism" in the form of reality
disproving the usefulness and ultimately the existence of moral idealism. There is
nothingness; the opposite of the monotheist "God" is "Satan," defined as the
philosophy of solipsism incarnated in anyone's active deeds. If "God" was imagined to
bring "good" causes into effect, then solipsism, by realising there is no reality, thus
disproves cause and effect, which, though liberating of the mind, is futile for any use
in bringing "good" into being by our own active deeds. If we embrace solipsism, we
embrace inactivity. Insofar as inactivity is neutral it is not "all good," and thus is
more partially "evil."

What is "evil" in reality? Ultimately, nothing. Therefore, nothingness is sole king-

God in the religion of solipsism. This defines the condition of the mind within each of
us that faces the binary moral choices in our immediate future at all times. Inside the
mind of each of us, which mind empowers us over natural reality alike we imagine
the monotheist God above the whole cosmos, there is the ideal of solipsism, the belief
that, because reality is malleable and obedient, pliable to our demands, etc. that
therefore it does not exist, but our mind does. This is false. Neither the solid material
reality, nor the interior mental ideal realm, exists. They are mutual fictions, each
imagining the other. A symbiosis of non-existent mind and non-existent nature
combine to form the wheel of suffering, the "yin yang," of polar extreme opposites
within the totality of solipsism's cosmology. Nothing exists, nothing is real, nothing
is ideal. All is Nothingness.

evaluation:

What does it mean that "God is dead"? It means the idea of a monotheist cosmic omni-
sentience has expired in its usefulness to our species. In truth, there never was a God.
We should not feel betrayed by this. It is not "God's" fault that He does not exist. It's
mankinds' fault for pretending He did. We should never have embarked down the
road of theism in general as a species, and it will result in our eventual extinction as
such. Arguing over the moral logical attributes of "God," we will kill ourselves all off,
and soon. This is only depressing because we were promised "God" and have been
given "hell on earth" instead. Of course this offends our moral sense of fairness,
justice, rightness and all those sorts of concepts. Ethics and morality are logical, we
have asserted as much as a species; does that amount to nothing? Yes, ultimately,
everything we do will be reduced to silt in space, until even space itself evaporates
into more etheral dimensions.

Ultimately, the only proveably true fact we can assert using our minds is the non-
existence of reality. We can prove reality is superior to the metal realm by killing -
such is the sole "moral" motive for any war. We can prove likewise reality is inferior
to the ideal realm by suicide as a species. Ultimately, we cannot add benefit to reality
by our minds, we cannot project our moral logic onto reality in any beneficial way,
and we should, and eventually will, as a species, simply give up and accept the defeat
of our ancient attempt to justify our own mistakes. Existence is a mistake. Life itself is
a mistake. We should not have been born. When we were conceived, we began to
dream this reality into being. When we were born it was complete. Now, we live
within it like a foetus floating in the womb, dreaming of the world beyond death.
Soon, we will die regardless, and all our dreams will be forgotten.

We are lied to and told we are promised a choice. But there's no choice. The choice
between "good" and "evil" is the choice between rotten apples or rotten oranges.
Either way, they will be rotten; such is their condition in being real. We may choose
apples or oranges in reality, and "good" or "evil" in ideal, but in reality, there is no
ideal, and in idealism, no reality at all.

conclusion:

There is no God, no good or evil, no right or wrong, no right or left, no night or day,
no up, down, inward, outward; there is no mind and no reality, no solid object exists
and neither does any imagined mental ideal. You can't manifest an apple out of an
orange, nor vice versa, and trying will probably only make the entire universe
collapse in upon you like an imploding balloon of smoke in the airlessness of outer-
space. There is no heaven, hell, life, death, earth nor cosmos; there is no your mind,
no my mind, there is no our mind, no natural mind. There is no mind at all, no reality
exists and you and I are not even real. I am not real, and I am not really telling you
this, because you are not real either. None of this is actually happening, because
reality is a loop that conserves both chaos and order equally, such that everything is
constantly changeing, but so that nothing ever permanently changes over time.
Ultimately, reality is an ocean and we are making waves in it that, when they finally
"go around," will "come back around" to sink us.

There is nothing. Nothing is real. Nothing exists. There is nothing more to say
beyond this. Ultimately, this is not the extent of "illuminist Luciferian-Satanism"
alone. It's the final conclusion to all forms of life and reality as a whole. You can
deny it, but denying it does not mean it is not true.

prediction:

You will not believe any of this. You, my student, will forget all that I have argued
out using moral logic and human reasoning. You will go back to watching tv and
eating microwave meals. You are already aware of the futility of your own existence,
and do not need to have your nose rubbed in it to prove the non-existence of God, of
morality, logic and ultimately everything else we like to assume is real as well.

If nothing exists and evil is caused by any activity we attempt, we have become
"freed" from the "godspell" only to be en-chained in our own regrets.

PEACE. - Jon

Yezidis: recognition signals, made with the hands:

(i) Degree of Disciiple; (ii) Degree of Ecstatic; (iii) Degree of Priest; (iv) Degree of Sheikh.
 Zeus / Jupiter enthroned

Pan Baphomet George Washington

History of the
Illuminati History 101::
introduction to this textbook
a communique for the IOBB2.

we’re the true illuminati

Annunaki, the merging of
Shiva and Shakti,
the central channel
in the left and right Nadhi's
expanding Merkaba
divine light body
the sons of light vs.
the sons of darkness
it's no competition we've won
regardless
the hethens, heartless
djinns and harlotts
all vanish when I unload my cartridge

- Jahn “Illuminati Congo” with ATMA and Sinister Stricken MadLung

from the song: “War of Sons of Light Vs. the Sons of Darkness”
from the ATMA album: the Higher Self

Aloha dear readers,

By means of an introduction to this introduction, allow me to reveal right away the

subject matter we will be considering in this meager tome of essays.

Illuminati History 101 covers the Yezidi, the Assassin Cult, the Priory of Zion, the
Bavarian Illuminati, the Skull and Bones, the Golden Dawn, the OTO, Thule, Majestic 12
and the Federal Reserve, the Bildeberg Group and Bohemian Grove Camp. Through
extensive quotes from online resources for free, authoritative material on these
subjects, I have compiled a collection of descriptive quotes and drawn a thread of
allusion between them in this section to tie together the entire historical arc of the
philosophy of the modern IO. This doubtlessly daunting task may elude a final,
comprehensive conclusion about neither the origins nor the modern mind-set of our
Order. By following the transformation, chronologically over the last 1000 years or
so, of the original, Gnostic, philosophical belief of the Yezidi in Malek Taus, the
Peacock Angel, we may see how it entered Europe during the Crusades via contact
between the Knights Templar and the Assassin Cult; see how it infiltrated the realm
of international financial institutions in the guise of modern occult rituals; and
finally we can face its plans for the visage and nature of our New World Order.

Illuminati Symbolism 101 covers the eye, the pyramid, the circumpunct and the
triangle, Illuminati axiom #1, the Illuminati Trinity, the Statue of Liberty, and the
double-headed phoenix, eagles and shields; as well as their symbolic meaning, their
use in media, the Cult of Anubis and their subliminal use. The goal here is to analyse
the various signs, signals and symbols of the modern IO, and to filter out those which
are not authentic to the tradition of our Order. For example, though the UGLE
recognises both Scottish and York rites, York is prefered in the north of Europe,
while the Scottish presides strongest in the southern United States. Thus, when we
see a symbol of 33rd° Scottish rite F&AM in the pedestal of the Statue of Liberty, we
understand its context as a gift by European national Masons to the US Masons of
their “New Atlantis.” But where we draw the line between Masonic and IO symbols is
defined in detail throughout the text by careful omission of all but those most ancient
and austere symbols of the IO’s working craft. Indeed, we must be extremely hesitant
to tread on any living soul’s beliefs, and so we must tread very lightly in mapping
the invisible terrain below this field of symbolism. In this introduction, I will briefly
discuss some further symbols of the pre-historic and latter-day incarnations of our
Order, however the reason they are excluded from the main body of the text on IO
symbolism in this text is due to their falling just outside the strictest interpretation of
what constitutes an authentically IO symbol, based on its date of original use. For
example, the symbols shown below, for the Twelvers and for the 5 Pillars of Islam,
are not included in the main portion of this work because they are not IO symbols,
despite being peripherally connected to the cult of the Assassins.

The Moslem religion is currently at war within itself between the Shi’ite and Sunni
factions, but is being manipulated into this position by the Catholic Church via their
crypto-Jesuit sleeper-cult of Maloch, the “Great Owl,” ie. the modern “IO,” the CIA.
The CIA, however, mostly know and care little more about their own origins in the
Yezidi cult than almost any modern Mason knows or cares about their society’s secret
origins in Egypt, with the construction of the Great Pyramid. This is why we must
deal gently, at worst, with the topics of some of these groups’ symbols, so as not to
upset the powers that be.

Likewise, I will not be making any pejorative “leaps of logic” where the meaning of
the symbols does not align 100%. For example, the star of the Druze faith, a defunct
sect of Shi’a, could be likened to the “F.A.T.A.L.” pentacle of the OES of co-Masonry.
However, doing so would tragically mislead the seeker unaware of their differences
in belief system and practises.
the Mountain Fortress of “Alamut,” the “Eagle’s Purchase,” in north-western Iran.

An ancient Yezidi Temple in north-eastern Iraq.

There has been such loose interpretation of what truly constitutes an IO symbol
because there remains an intentional misdirection away from consensus on what the
IO is, itself. In fact, the final question of the “membership application” form for a
certain online IO forum asks the applicant to define the word “Illuminati” from their
own point of view. Because the IO is a symbol of power and mystery, many come to it
seeking its secrets. However, only those who cast aside their own baggage and do not
bring it with them into their analysis of the symbolic data-set can remain rational,
calm and Objective. These people are fit to be called “True Illuminati,” however not
the rest who fail to grasp that the subjective nature of this question implies, only
falsely, that the IO has an unlimited capacity for power through mystery. These
wash-outs of the push to re-take the concept of “Illuminism” from its current use by
the economic elites, rather than change the IO from within, assail it from without,
slandering the Plan and its participants by considering the IO a “Babylonian
Brotherhood,” and we, Illuminati, ourselves, merely reptilian over-lords assuming
humanoid appearance to maintain our direct control over their own, and everyone
elses,’ minds. Of course, only when you Wake Up and realise there is no real
conspiracy that controls anyone personally, let alone within their own interior
psyche, do you cease being a lunatic and begin being a True Illuminati.

A “True Illuminati,” according to a strict adherance to the Bavarian “Illuminati’s”

founder, Adam Weishaupt, uses the “pyramid” or “ponzi scheme” structure only to
forward the IO’s opposition to “All Existing Religious and Social Institutions,” in
short, by applying the enemy’s own symbolic means, they seek to accomplish their
own ends more rapidly and with longer term success than those who seek to
perpetuate the myths associated with this symbol, and their Solar “slave mentality.”
The “hive-mind” is a symbol anti-thetical to the Light of the individual Illuminati.
Thus, this meta-form, the “eye in the triangle,” represents the first steps toward the
downfall of mankind’s individualism. The truncated pyramidon represents the drone,
zombie slaves, while the missing cap-stone signifies the Great Work accomplished.
This symbol is of “God” and “government,” for “Church” and “State,” for religion and
politics, recombined in Plato’s “Republican ideal” golden ratio (1:2) class-structure.
The pyramid is, in truth, an enourmous esoteric energy engine meant to pulverise
and channel upward one’s own individual soul by lying in the King’s Chambre
sarcophagus. This ritual may “take the weight off the chest” of an individual, but the
cult that formed around this ritual became corrupted immediately upon origin. There
is no truly “Babylonian” Brotherhood now, just as there is no longer an “Illuminati.”
Yet very many of those who use the pyramid symbol today do so without regard for
their own history, and do so at their own risk. Instead of drawing gravity downward,
with the goal of liberating the soul’s Light, inspiration, most modern adherants use
this symbol to subliminally impute their own authority over other people by
employing cash currency as a form of electro-magnetic current, to shock and awe
their foes and betters alike. As they say on the US dollar bill, “Fortune Favours the
New World Order.” Likewise is it said, “One Nation Under God,” with the caveat added
by US past-President George W. Bush Jr. “just so long as I’m the dictator.”

In reading this humble offering of some meager knowledge on the true modus
operendi of the “modern” Illuminati, please bear in mind your own definition for
what constitutes the “True IO.” Bear in mind no two interpretations are alike. But
bear in mind also that this does not mean even one single idea is the only final truth.

PEACE.
- Jonathan Barlow Gee
Tallahassee, Florida
January 16, 2011.
Illuminati History 101.A::
the Yezidi:
a communique for the IOBB2.

Quote:
Signs of early agriculture date back as far as 9000 BC to the foothills of the Zagros Mountains, in
cities later named Anshan and Susa. Jarmo is one archaeological site in this area. Shanidar, where
the ancient skeletal remains of Neanderthals have been found, is another.

Some of the earliest evidence of production has been discovered in the Zagros Mountains; both the
settlements of Hajji Firuz Tepe and Godin Tepe have given evidence of wine storage dating between
3500 and 5400 BC.

During early ancient times, the Zagros was the home of peoples such as the Kassites, Guti,
Assyrians, Elamites and Mitanni, who periodically invaded the Sumerian and/or Akkadian cities
of Mesopotamia. The mountains create a geographic barrier between the flatlands of Mesopotamia,
which is in Iraq, and the Iranian plateau. A small archive of clay tablets detailing the complex
interactions of these groups in the early second millennium BC has been found at Tell Shemshara
along the Little Zab.

- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zagros_Mountains#Zagros_in_history

Quote:
Yazdanism is a term introduced by Mehrdad Izady to denote a group of native Kurdish
monotheistic religions: Alevism, Yarsan and Yazidism.

The Yazdani faiths were the primary religion of the inhabitants of the Zagros Mountains,
including Kurds, until their progressive Islamization in the 10th century. The three
denominations of Yazdanism are primarily practiced in relatively isolated communities, from
Khurasan to Anatolia and southern Iran. The adherents of Alevism, Ahl-e Haqq and Yezidi are
estimated to constitute about one-third of the Kurds. The main body of the followers of Alevism,
however, are the Anatolian Turkmens and Turks, while in Syria, Lebanon and Israel, they are
Arabs. In Iran, the followers of the Ahl-i Haqq can be as often the Azeris, Persians, and
Mazandarani as Kurds. The religion in its current fragmented state into many independent
denominations is "a belief system of great antiquity that is fundamentally a non-Semitic religion,
with an Aryan superstructure overlaying a religious foundation indigenous to the Zagros. To
identify the Cult or any of its denominations as Islamic is simply a mistake born of a lack of
knowledge of the religion, which pre-dates Islam by millennia."

The adherents of these faiths were referred to as the "Sabians of Harran" (of Carrhae) in
Maimonides' Guide for the Perplexed. The Sabians are also mentioned in the Qur'an and in Bahai
writings.

- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yazdânism

Quote:
The origin of the Yazidi religion is now usually seen by scholars as a complex process of
syncretism, whereby the belief system and practices of a local faith had a profound influence on
the religiosity of adherents of the Adawiyya Sufi order living in the Kurdish mountains, and
caused it to deviate from Islamic norms relatively soon after the death of its founder, Shaykh Adi
ibn Musafir, who is said to be of Umayyad descent. He settled in the valley of Lalis (some thirty-
six miles north-east of Mosul) in the early 12th century. Sex Adi himself, a figure of undoubted
orthodoxy, enjoyed widespread influence. He died in 1162, and his tomb at Lalis is a focal point
of Yazidi pilgrimage.

During the fourteenth century, important Kurdish tribes whose sphere of influence stretched well
into what is now Turkey (including, for a period, the rulers of the principality of Jazira) are cited
in historical sources as Yazidi.

According to Mohammed As-Sahrastani, “The Yezidis are the followers of Yezid bn Unaisa, who
[said that he] kept friendship with the first Muhakkama before the Azarika” ... “It is clear, then,
that As-Sahrastani finds the religious origin of this interesting people in the person of Yezid bn
Unaisa. ... We are to understand, therefore, that to the knowledge of the writer, bn Unaisa is the
founder of the Yezidi sect, which took its name from him.” ... “Now, the first Muhakkamah is an
appellative applied to the Muslim schismatics called Al-Hawarij ... . ... According to this it might
be inferred that the Yezidis were originally a Harijite sub-sect.” ... “Yezid moreover, is said to
have been in sympathy with Al-Abadiyah, a sect founded by ‘Abd-Allah Ibn Ibad"; and the Ibadi
sect is another Harijite sub-sect."

- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yazidi#Origins

Quote:
Shaykh Adi ibn Musafir al-Umawi (died 1162), a descendant of Umayyad Caliph Marwan ibn al-
Hakam, was born in the 1070s in the Beqaa Valley of present-day Lebanon. The Yazidi consider
him an avatar of Tawuse Melek, the "Peacock Angel". His tomb at Lalish, Iraq is a focal point of
Yazidi pilgrimage.

Sex Adi spent much of his early life in Baghdad. To attain a sufi life and seclude himself he
sought a quiet haven in Kurdistan, an area strongly associated with indigenous Iranian religious
movements such as Zoroastrianism.

Despite his desire for seclusion, he impressed the local population with his asceticism and
miracles.

- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sheikh_Adi_ibn_Musafir

Quote:
In 2007, a group of around 200 Yazidis beat and stoned a 17-year-old Yazidi girl named Du’a
Khalil Aswad for falling in love with a Muslim boy. On April 23, 2007 masked gunmen abducted
and shot 23 Yazidis near Mosul; this was speculated to be a reprisal attack for Aswad's death.

On August 14, 2007 Yazidis were targeted in a series of bombings that became the deadliest
suicide attack since the Iraq War began.

- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yazidi#Recent_controversies
Illuminati History 101.B::
the Assassin Cult:
a communique for the IOBB2.

Quote:
Twelver or Imami Shia Islam is the largest branch of Shia Islam. Adherents of Twelver Shiaism are
commonly referred to as Twelvers, which is derived from their belief in twelve divinely ordained
leaders, known as the Twelve Imams and their belief that the Mahdi will be none other than the
returned Twelfth Imam that disappeared and is believed by Twelvers to be in occultation.
Approximately 85% of Shia are Twelvers, and the term Shi'a Muslim as commonly used in English
usually refers to Twelver Shia Muslims only.

Twelvers share many tenets of Shiasm with related sects, such as the belief in Imams, but the
Ismaili and Zaydi Shia sects each believe in a different number of Imams and for the most part, a
different path of succession regarding the Imamate. They also differ in the role and overall
definition of an Imam.

- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twelvers

Quote:
Seveners are a branch of Ismaili Shia. They became known as "Seveners" because they believe that
Ismail ibn Ja’far was the seventh and the last Imam (hereditary leader of the Muslim community
in the direct line of Ali ibn Abi Talib). They believed his son, Muhammad ibn Ismail al-Maktum,
would return and bring about an age of justice as al-Mahdi. Their most famous and active branch
were the Qarmatians.

Sometimes "sevener" is used to refer to all Ismailis, though those of Fatimid heritage recognize
more than seven Imams. Note that the number seven plays a general role in the theology of the
Ismailiyya, including mystical speculations that there are seven heavens, seven continents, seven
orifices in the skull, seven days in a week, seven prophets, and so forth.

There are few strict Seveners — those who do not recognize the Fatimids — remaining among
Muslims today. Some scholars doubt that they exist today.

- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seveners

Quote:
The Qarmatians ("Those Who Wrote in Small Letters") were a Shi'a Ismaili group centered in
eastern Arabia, where they established a utopian republic in 899 CE. They are most famed for
their revolt against the Abbasid Caliphate. Mecca suffered great indignity by the sect’s leader
Tahir Sulayman, particularly with their theft of the Black Stone and desecration of the Well of
Zamzam with Muslim corpses during the Hajj season of 930 CE.

The sack of Mecca followed millenarian fervour among the Qarmatians (as well as in Persia) over
the conjunction of Saturn and Jupiter in 928 – an event which happens every 960 years. The date
of the conjunction, 27 October 928 CE, was interpreted in light of Islamic revelation, which they
saw as heralding a new period as a return of Persian dominance.

In 931 Abu Tahir believed he had found the new Mahdi in a young Persian former prisoner from
Isfahan named Abu'l-Fadl al-Isfahani, but later he was removed due to deviant beliefs from Islam.

- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qarmatians

Quote:
The Druze faith began as a movement in Ismailism that was mainly influenced by Greek
philosophy and gnosticism and opposed certain religious and philosophical ideologies that were
present during that epoch.

The faith was founded by Hamza ibn Ali ibn Ahmad, a Persian Ismaili mystic and scholar. He
came to Egypt in 1014 and assembled a group of scholars and leaders from across the Islamic
world to form a new Unitarian movement. The order's meetings were held in the Raydan Mosque,
near the Al-Hakim Mosque.

In 1017, Hamza officially revealed the Druze faith and began to preach his doctrine. Hamza gained
the support of the Fatimid Caliph al-Hakim, who issued a decree promoting religious freedom
prior to the declaration of the divine call.

Al-Hakim became a central figure in the Druze faith even though his own religious position was
disputed among scholars. John Esposito states that al-Hakim believed that "he was not only the
divinely appointed religio-political leader but also the cosmic intellect linking God with
creation," while others like Nissim Dana and Mordechai Nisan state that he is perceived as the
manifestation and the reincarnation of God or presumably the image of God.

Some Druze and non-Druze scholars like Samy Swayd and Sami Makarem state that this confusion
is due to confusion about the role of the early heretical preacher ad-Darazi, whose teachings the
Druze rejected as heretical. These sources assert that al-Hakim refused ad-Darazi's claims of
divinity, and ordered the elimination of his movement while supporting that of Hamza ibn Ali.

Al-Hakim disappeared one night while out on his evening ride - presumably assassinated,
perhaps at the behest of his formidable elder sister Sitt al-Mulk. The Druze believe he went into
Occultation with Hamza ibn Ali and three other prominent preachers, leaving the care of the
"Unitarian missionary movement" to a new leader, Bahau d-Din.

- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Druze#Early_history

Quote:
The origins of the Assassins trace back to just before the First Crusade around 1080. It is
difficult to find out much information about the origins of the Assassins because most early
sources are either written by enemies of the cult or based on legends. Most sources dealing with
the order’s inner working were destroyed with the capture of Alamut, the Assassin's
headquarters. However, it's possible to trace the beginnings of the cult back to its first
Grandmaster, Hasan-i Sabbah.

A passionate believer of the Isma’ili beliefs, Hasan-i-Sabbah was well liked throughout Cairo,
Syria, and most of the Middle East by other Isma’ili, which led to a number of people becoming his
followers. Using his fame and popularity, Sabbah founded the Order of the Assassins. While his
motives for founding this order are ultimately unknown, it has been speculated that it was for his
own political and personal gain and to also exact vengeance on his enemies. His motivation for
political power probably came through what he thought to be dealings with other Muslims in the
Middle East, particularly Sunnis, but because of the unrest in the holy land caused by the calling
of the Crusades, Hasan-i-Sabbah found himself not only fighting for power with other Muslims,
but also with the invading Christian forces.

After creating the Order, Sabbah searched for a location that would be fit for a sturdy
headquarters and decided on the fortress at Alamut in what is now northwestern Iran. It is still
disputed whether Sabbah built the fortress himself or if it was already built at the time of his
arrival. Whether he created it himself or not, Sabbah adapted the fortress to suit his needs of not
only defense from hostile forces, but also indoctrination of his followers. After laying claim to
the fortress at Alamut, Sabbah began expanding his influence outward to nearby towns and
districts, using his agents to gain political favour and intimidate the local populations.

Spending most of his days at Alamut working on religious works and doctrines for his Order,
Sabbah was never to leave his fortress again in his lifetime. He had established a secret society of
deadly assassins, one which was built in a hierarchical format. Below Sabbah, the Grand
Headmaster of the Order, were those known as “Greater Propagandists”, followed by the normal
"Propagandists", the Rafiqs ("Companions"), and the Lasiqs ("Adherents"). It was the Lasiqs who
were trained to become some of the most feared assassins, or as they were called, "Fida'i" (self-
sacrificing agent), in the known world.

It is, however, unknown how Hassan-i-Sabbah was able to get his "Fida’i" to perform with such
fervent loyalty. One theory, possibly the most well known but also the most criticized, comes from
the observations from Marco Polo during his travels to the Orient. He describes how the "Old Man
of the Mountain" (Sabbah) would drug his young followers with hashish, lead them to a "paradise",
and then claim that only he had the means to allow for their return. Perceiving that Sabbah was
either a prophet or some kind of magic man, his disciples, believing that only he could return
them to "paradise", were fully committed to his cause and willing to carry out his every request.
With his new weapons, Sabbah began to order multiple assassinations, ranging from politicians to
great generals. Assassins rarely would attack ordinary citizens though and tended not to be
hostile towards them.

Although the "Fida’i" were the lowest rank in Sabbah’s order and only used as expendable pawns
to do the Grandmaster’s bidding, much time and many resources were put in to training them. The
Assassins were generally young in age giving them the physical strength and stamina which would
be required to carry out these murders. However, physical prowess was not the only trait that was
required to be a "Fida’i". To get to their targets, the Assassins had to be patient, cold, and
calculating. They were generally intelligent and well read because they were required to possess
not only knowledge about their enemy, but his or her culture and their native language. They were
trained by their masters to disguise themselves, sneak in to enemy territory and perform the
assassinations instead of simply attacking their target outright.
As tensions in the Middle East grew during the Crusades, the Assassins were also known for
taking contracts from outside sources on either side of the war, whether it was from the invading
Crusaders or the Saracen forces, so long as the assassination fit in to the Grandmaster's plan.

- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hashshashin

Quote:
According to polemical accounts which would evolve into legend; a future assassin was subjected
to rites very similar to those of other mystery cults in which the subject was made to believe that
he was in imminent danger of death. But the twist of the assassins was that they drugged the
person to simulate a "dying" to later have them awaken in a garden flowing with wine and served a
sumptuous feast by virgins. The supplicant was then convinced he was in Heaven and that Sabbah
was a representative of the divinity and that all of his orders should be followed, even to death.
This legend derives from Marco Polo, who visited Alamut just after it fell to the Mongols in the
thirteenth century.

Other accounts of the indoctrination attest that the future assassins were brought to Alamut at a
young age and, while they matured, inhabited the aforementioned paradisaical gardens and were
kept drugged with hashish; as in the previous version, Hassan occupied this garden as a divine
emissary. At a certain point (when their initiation could be said to have begun) the drug was
withdrawn from them, and they were removed from the gardens and flung into a dungeon. There
they were informed that, if they wished to return to the paradise they had so recently enjoyed it
would be at Sabbah's discretion, and that they must therefore follow his directions exactly, up to
and including murder and self-sacrifice.

It is said that Sabbah's last words as he lay dying, were "Nothing is true, everything is
permitted."

- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hassan_Sabbah

Quote:
Hasan began to attract young men from the surrounding countryside, between the ages of twelve
and twenty: particularly those whom he marked out as possible material for the production of
killers. Every day he held court, a reception at which he spoke of the delights of Paradise... "and
at certain times he caused draughts of soporific nature to be administered to ten or a dozen
youths, and when half dead with sleep he had them conveyed to the several palaces and apartments
of the garden. Upon awakening from this state of lethargy their senses were struck by all the
delightful objects, and each perceiving himself surrounded by lovely damsels, singing, playing,
and attracting his regards by the most fascinating caresses, serving him also with delicious
viands and exquisite wines, until, intoxicated with excess and enjoyment, amidst actual rivers of
milk and wine, he believed himself assuredly in Paradise, and felt an unwillingness to relinquish
its delights. When four or five days had thus been passed, they were thrown once more into a state
of somnolency, and carried out of the garden. Upon being carried to his presence, and questioned
by him as to where they had been, their answer was 'in Paradise, through the favour of your
highness'; and then, before the whole court who listened to them with eager astonishment and
curiosity, they gave a circumstantial account of the scenes to which they had been witnesses. The
chief thereupon addressing them said: 'We have the assurance of our Prophet that he who defends
his Lord shall inherit Paradise, and if you show yourselves to be devoted to the obedience of my
orders, that happy lot awaits you'."

Suicide was at first attempted by some; but the survivors were early told that only death in the
obedience of Hasan's orders could give the Key to Paradise. In the eleventh century it was not only
credulous Persian peasants who would have believed such things were true. Even among more
sophisticated people the reality of the gardens and houris of paradise were completely accepted.
True, a good many Sufis preached that the garden was allegorical - but that still left more than a
few people who believed that they could trust the evidence of their senses.

The ancient Art of Imposture, by Abdel-Rahman of Damascus, gives away another trick of Hasan's.
He had a deep, narrow pit sunk into the floor of his audience-chamber. One of his disciples stood
in this, in such a way that his head and neck alone were visible above the floor. Around the neck
was placed a circular dish in two pieces which fitted together, with a hole in the middle. This gave
the impression that there was a severed head on a metal plate standing on the floor. In order to
make the scene more plausible (if that is the word) Hasan had some fresh blood poured around the
head, on the plate.

Now certain recruits were brought in. "Tell them," commanded the chief, "what thou hast seen."
The disciple then described the delights of Paradise. "You have seen the head of a man who died,
whom you al knew. I have reanimated him to speak with his own tongue."

Later, the head was tracherously severed in real earnest, and stuck for some time somewhere that
the faithful would see it. The effect of this conjuring trick plus murder increased the enthusiasm
for martyrdom to the required degree.

There are many documented instances of the recklessness of the fidayeen (devotees) of the
Ismailis, one witness being a Westerner who was treated a century later to a similar spectacle to
that which had appalled the envoy of Malik Shah. Henry, Count of Champagne, reports that he was
travelling in 1194 through Ismaili territory. The chief sent some persons to salute him and beg
that, on his return he would stop at and partake of the hospitality of the castle. The Count
accepted the invitation. As he returned, the Dai-el-Kebir (Great Missionary) advanced to meet
him, showed him every mark of honour, and let him view his castle and fortresses. Having passed
through several, they came at length to one of the towers which rose to an exceeding height. On
each tower stood two sentinels clad in white. 'These,' said the Chief, pointing to them, 'obey me far
better than the subjects of our Christians obey their lords;' and at a given signal two of them flung
themselves down, and were dashed to pieces. 'If you wish,' said he to the astonished Count, 'all my
white ones shall do the same.' The benevolent Count shrank from the proposal, and candidly
avowed that no Christian prince could presume to look for such obedience from his subjects. When
he was departing, with many valuable presents, the Chief said to him meaningly, 'By means of
these trusty servants I get rid of the enemies of our society.’

- http://www.phinnweb.org/neuro/assassins.html

Quote:
Hasan reduced the original number of degrees of initiation from nine to the mystical number of
seven. A similar number of regulations formed the rules of the Order. This, in fact, comprised the
working plan of the spreading of the Faith. The First Rule was the the Missionary must know
human psychology in such a way as to be able to select suitable people for admission to the cult;
and was summed up in the mnemonic: Cast no seeds upon rocks. The second rule of procedure was
the application of flattery and gaining the confidence of the prospective member. Third came the
casting of doubt into the mind, by superior knowledge. Fourthly, the teacher must apply an oath
to student never to betray any of the ‘truths’ which were to be revealed to him. Now he was told, as
the fifth stage, that Ismailism was a powerful secret organization, supported by some of the most
important figures of the time. After this, the aspirant was questioned and studied, to discover
whether he had absorbed the opinions of the teacher and attached himself sufficiently into a
position of dependence upon his ideas. At this stage he was asked to meditate upon the meaning of
the reported saying of the prophet that "Paradise lies in the shadow of swords". In the final
degree, many difficult passages of the Koran were explained in terms of allegory.

- http://www.phinnweb.org/neuro/assassins2.html
Illuminati History 101.C::
the Priory of Zion:
a communique for the IOBB2.

The Prieurie De Zion, or Priory (Catholic Order) of Zion, is much more real
historically, and much more commonly known, as the Knights Templar.

The Knights Templar were founded by nine monastic knights, and these nine
knights comprised the Catholic Order of Citeaux, known for its philosophy of
"zionism."

These nine knights were:

1) Hugh de Payens, Legate of the Holy See, and Archbishop of Lyons, who gave holy
sanction to the formation of the Order of six original members.

2) St. Robert, son of the noble Thierry and Ermengarde of Champagne, Abbot of
Molesme, a monastery dependent on Cluny. Appalled by the laxity into which the
Order of Cluny had fallen, he endeavoured to effect reforms in the monasteries of
Saint-Pierre-de-la-Celle, Saint-Michel of Tonnerre, and finally in that of Molesme.

3) Raynald, Viscount of Beaune, ceded to the number of twenty-one the company

retired to the solitude of Cîteaux (in the Diocese of Chalons).

4) Gauthier, bishop of the diocese.

5) the prior, Alberic, was elected to replace St. Robert at Cîteaux. St. Alberic died in
1109.

6 & 7) John and Ilbode, two monks sent as delegates to Pascal II (who had just
succeeded Urban II) to beg him to take the church of Cîteaux under the protection of
the Apostolic See.

8) Pascal II declared that he took under his immediate protection the abbey and the
religious, of Cîteaux, saving their allegiance to the Church of Chalons.

9) Stephen Harding, an Englishman by birth, well versed in sacred and profane

science, who had been one of the first promoters of the project to leave Molesme.

in the Catholic Encyclopedia, New Advent dot org wrote:

Cistercians
I. THE FORMATION (1098-1134)
On the feast of St. Benedict (21 March), 1098, which fell that year on Palm Sunday, they
commenced to build the "New Monastery", as it is called in the "Exordium sacri Ordinis
Cisterciensis". This, therefore, was the birthday of the Order of Cîteaux. Thus was the "New
Monastery" canonically erected into an abbey. By Apostolic Letters, dated at Troja in Campania,
18 April, 1100, Pascal II declared that he took under his immediate protection the abbey and the
religious, of Cîteaux, saving their allegiance to the Church of Chalons. Dating from this day,
Alberic and his religious established at Cîteaux the exact observance of the Rule of St. Benedict,
substituted the white habit for the black which the Benedictines wore, and, the better to observe
the rule in regard to the Divine Office day and night, associated with themselves lay brothers, to
be chiefly occupied with the manual labours and material affairs of the order. These lay brothers,
or conversi, though they were not monks, were to be treated during life and after death just like
the monks themselves. St. Robert, his two immediate successors, and their companions had but one
object in view: a reaction against the laxity of Cluny and of other monasteries -- to resume manual
labour, to adopt a more severe regimen, and to restore in monastic churches and church
ceremonies the gravity and simplicity proper to the monastic profession. They never thought of
founding a new order, and yet from Cîteaux were to go forth, in course of time, colonies of monks
who should found other monasteries destined to become other Cîteaux, and thus create an order
distinct from that of Cluny.

http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/03780c.htm

in the Catholic Encyclopedia, New Advent dot org wrote:

The Knights Templars

(1) THEIR HUMBLE BEGINNING
In 1118, during the reign of Baldwin II, Hugues de Payens, a knight of Champagne, and eight
companions bound themselves by a perpetual vow, taken in the presence of the Patriarch of
Jerusalem, to defend the Christian kingdom. Baldwin accepted their services and assigned them a
portion of his palace, adjoining the temple of the city; hence their title "pauvres chevaliers du
temple" (Poor Knights of the Temple). Poor indeed they were, being reduced to living on alms, and,
so long as they were only nine, they were hardly prepared to render important services, unless it
were as escorts to the pilgrims on their way from Jerusalem to the banks of the Jordan, then
frequented as a place of devotion.

The Templars had as yet neither distinctive habit nor rule. Hugues de Payens journeyed to the
West to seek the approbation of the Church and to obtain recruits. At the Council of Troyes
(1128), at which he assisted and at which St. Bernard was the leading spirit, the Knights Templars
adopted the Rule of St. Benedict, as recently reformed by the Cistercians. They accepted not only
the three perpetual vows, besides the crusader's vow, but also the austere rules concerning the
chapel, the refectory, and the dormitory. They also adopted the white habit of the Cistercians,
adding to it a red cross.

http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/14493a.htm

in the Catholic Encyclopedia, New Advent dot org wrote:

Crusades
I. ORIGIN OF THE CRUSADES
Godfrey of Bouillon died at Jerusalem 18 July, 1100. His brother and successor, Baldwin of
Edessa, was crowned King of Jerusalem in the Basilica of Bethlehem, 25 December, 1100. ... The
authority of the Church also helped to limit the power of the king; the four metropolitan sees of
Tyre, Cæsarea, Bessan, and Petra were subject to the Patriarch of Jerusalem, similarly seven
suffragan sees and a great many abbeys, among them Mount Sion, Mount Olivet, the Temple,
Josaphat, and the Holy Sepulchre. ... From a military point of view all vassals owed the king
unlimited service as to time, though he was obliged to compensate them, but to fill the ranks of
the army it was necessary to enroll natives who received a life annuity (fief de soudée). In this
way was recruited the light cavalry of the "Turcoples", armed in Saracenic style. Altogether these
forces barely exceeded 20,000 men, and yet the powerful vassals who commanded them were
almost independent of the king. So it was that the great need of regular troops for the defence of
the Christian dominions brought about the creation of a unique institution, the religious orders of
knighthood, viz.: the Hospitallers, who at first did duty in the Hospital of St. John founded by the
aforesaid merchants of Amalfi, and were then organized into a militia by Gérard du Puy that they
might fight the Saracens (1113); and the Templars, nine of whom in 1118 gathered around Hugues
de Payens and received the Rule of St. Bernard.

-source: http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/04543c.htm#I

in the Catholic Encyclopedia, New Advent dot org wrote:

Albigenses
A neo-Manichæan sect that flourished in southern France in the twelfth and thirteenth centuries.
The name Albigenses, given them by the Council of Tours (1163) prevailed towards the end of the
twelfth century and was for a long time applied to all the heretics of the south of France. They
were also called Catharists (katharos, pure), though in reality they were only a branch of the
Catharistic movement.

II. ORIGIN AND HISTORY

In France, where they were probably introduced by a woman from Italy, the Neo-Manichæan
doctrines were secretly diffused for several years before they appeared, almost simultaneously,
near Toulouse and at the Synod of Orléans (1022). Those who proposed them were even made to
suffer the extreme penalty of death. The Council of Arras (1025), Charroux, Dep. of Vienne (c.
1028), and of Reims (1049) had to deal with the heresy. At that of Beauvais (1114) the case of
Neo-Manichæans in the Diocese of Soissons was brought up, but was referred to the council
shortly to be held in the latter city. Petrobrusianism now familiarized the South with some of the
tenets of the Albigenses. Its condemnation by the Council of Toulouse (1119) did not prevent the
evil from spreading. Pope Eugene III (1145-53) sent a legate, Cardinal Alberic of Ostia, to
Languedoc (1145), and St. Bernard seconded the legate's efforts. But their preaching produced no
lasting effect. The Council of Reims (1148) excommunicated the protectors "of the heretics of
Gascony and Provence." That of Tours (1163) decreed that the Albigenses should be imprisoned
and their property confiscated. A religious disputation was held (1165) at Lombez, with the usual
unsatisfactory result of such conferences. Two years later, the Albigenses held a general council
at Toulouse, their chief centre of activity. The Cardinal-Legate Peter made another attempt at
peaceful settlement (1178), but he was received with derision. The Third General Council of the
Lateran (1179) renewed the previous severe measures and issued a summons to use force against
the heretics, who were plundering and devastating Albi, Toulouse, and the vicinity. At the death
(1194) of the Catholic Count of Toulouse, Raymond V, his succession fell to Raymond VI (1194-
1222) who favoured the heresy. With the accession of Innocent III (1198) the work of conversion
and repression was taken up vigorously. In 1205-6 three events augured well for the success of
the efforts made in that direction. Raymond VI, in face of the threatening military operations
urged by Innocent against him, promised under oath to banish the dissidents from his dominions.
The monk Fulco of Marseilles, formerly a troubadour, now became Archbishop of Toulouse (1205-
31). Two Spaniards, Diego, Bishop of Osma and his companion, Dominic Guzman (St. Dominic),
returning from Rome, visited the papal legates at Montpellier. By their advice, the excessive
outward splendour of Catholic preachers, which offended the heretics, was replaced by apostolical
austerity. Religious disputations were renewed. St. Dominic, perceiving the great advantages
derived by his opponents from the cooperation of women, founded (1206) at Pouille near
Carcassonne a religious congregation for women, whose object was the education of the poorer girls
of the nobility. Not long after this he laid the foundation of the Dominican Order. Innocent III, in
view of the immense spread of the heresy, which infected over 1000 cities or towns, called (1207)
upon the King of France, as Suzerain of the County of Toulouse, to use force. He renewed his
appeal on receiving news of the assassination of his legate, Peter of Castelnau, a Cistercian monk
(1208), which judging by appearances, he attributed to Raymond VI. Numerous barons of northern
France, Germany, and Belgium joined the crusade, and papal legates were put at the head of the
expedition, Arnold, Abbot of Citeaux, and two bishops. Raymond VI, still under the ban of
excommunication pronounced against him by Peter of Castelnau, now offered to submit, was
reconciled with the Church, and took the field against his former friends. Roger, Viscount of
Béziers, was first attacked, and his principal fortresses, Béziers and Carcassonne, were taken
(1209). The monstrous words: "Slay all; God will know His own," alleged to have been uttered at
the capture of Béziers, by the papal legate.

-source: http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/01267e.htm

all of this is discussed in greater deal than I can go into here by Laurence Gardner on
pages 209 - 211 of his book Bloodline of the Holy Grail. These pages conclude with the
enigmatic footnote:

Laurence Gardner wrote:

The original Order of Sion was established so that eligble Muslims, Jews and others could be
allied to the Christian Order that became the Knights Templars.

After reading pages 209 to 211, you will understand what Gardner is referring to by
"others," that is, the Desposyni, the descendents of the family of Jesus Christ. The
nine French knights who were the founding members of the original Knights
Templar were all comtes (counts) of Desposyni descent through the Merovingian
bloodlines of France.

Something must have been happening around 1680,1 for there to have been caused
the schism between the Plantard-line and the Saint-Claire -line. The second Order is
supposed to have been begun in 1681, under its supposed founder, Jean-Tim Negri
d'Albes, first official "Grand Master" of the Second Order.

Quote:

1. Jean-Tim Negri d'Albes (1681)

We also know, if we suppose both lists to be accurate from their record keepers' point of view, at
the same time this Second Order was being founded, the original Order of Zion continued on with
its uninterupted flow connecting its founder Jean de Gisors, 1188, to the then current descendent
Pierre Plantard, 1984.

Quote:

18. Robert Boyle (1654-1691)

We can compare the records for both Orders at the time of the apparent schism, however in this
case we find there are far more records for the contemporary Plantard line Grand Master than for
the first "Grand Master" of the Saint-Claire line. Here, for example, is a brief description of what
was going on in the life of Robert Boyle, supposed then Head of the Priory of Zion, around the time
the schism within the Priory is supposed to have occured, leading to the split between the
Plantard and the Saint-Claire lists.

wiki wrote:

ROBERT BOYLE
In 1663 the Invisible College became the Royal Society of London for the Improvement of Natural
Knowledge, and the charter of incorporation granted by Charles II of England, named Boyle a
member of the council. In 1680 he was elected president of the society, but declined the honour
from a scruple about oaths.... It was during his time at Oxford that Boyle was a Chevalier. The
Chevaliers are thought to have been established by royal order a few years before Boyle's time at
Oxford. The period of Boyle's residence was marked by the reactionary actions of the victorious
parliamentarian forces, consequently this period marked the most secretive period of Chevalier
movements and thus little is known about Boyle's involvement beyond his membership.

-source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Boyle

Here are the books that Boyle published around this time, which were, notably, on
how to translate base gold into a self-luminescent monoatomic element (known
Alchemically as Orichalc, the Hermeticist stone).

Quote:

Aerial Noctiluca 1680

Icy Noctiluca 1680
Things above Reason 1681

Perhaps, it might be wiser to look back instead to why the Saint-Clairs split off to
form their own successive group. Their most recent member,

Quote:

16. Thomas Plantard de Saint-Clair (1989)

from the Saint Clair succession, seems to be a direct bloodline descendent of another Saint Clair, a
member of the original Order of Zion (culminating in Plantard), almost 650 years before.

Quote:

6. Jean de Saint-Clair (1351-1366)

herself, hearks back to the second ever Grand Master of the Priory of Zion, her
ancestor,

Quote:

2. Marie de Saint-Clair (1220-1266)

about whom, wiki writes:

wiki wrote:

Marie de Saint-Clair b abt 1192 was said-to-be descended from Henry de Saint-Clair, Baron of
Roslin in Scotland, who accompanied Godfroi de Boullion on the First Crusade. Marie's
grandmother married into the French Chaumont family - as did Jean de Gisors. Marie may have
been the second wife of Jean de Gisors.

-source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_de_Saint-Clair

So, we have it: the Saint-Clairs are descendents on their maternal side (Marie, GM #2)
of the original Knights Templar, and on their paternal side (Jean Gisors), founder of
the Order, or the Priory, of Zion.
Quote:
ERGÈRE PAS DE TENTATION QUE POUSSIN
TENIERS GARDENT LA CLEF PAX DCLXXXI
PAR LA CROIX ET CE CHEVAL DE DIEU
J'ACHÈVE CE DAEMON DE GARDIEN À MIDI
POMMES BLEUES

(in English)
Quote:
SHEPHERDESS NO TEMPTATION THAT POUSSIN
TENIERS HOLD THE KEY PEACE 681
BY THE CROSS AND THIS HORSE OF GOD
I COMPLETE (or I DESTROY) THIS DEMON GUARDIAN AT MIDDAY
BLUE APPLES.
Illuminati History 101.D::
the Hellfire Club:
a communique for the IOBB2.

Quote:
The very first Hellfire Club was founded in London in 1719, by Philip, Duke of Wharton and a
handful of other high society friends. Lord Wharton, made a Duke by George I, was a prominent
politician with two separate lives: the first, "a...man of letters" and the second, "...a drunkard, a
rioter, an infidel and a rake". The members included Wharton's immediate friends: Earl of
Hillsborough, cousin – the Earl of Lichfield and Sir Ed. O'Brien. Wharton's club admitted men and
women as equals, unlike other clubs of the time. The club met on Sundays at a number of different
locations around London. The Greyhound Tavern was one of the meeting places used regularly, but
because women were not to be seen in taverns, the meetings were also held at members' houses and
at Wharton's riding club.

The club motto was Fais ce que tu voudras (Do what thou wilt), a philosophy of life associated with
François Rabelais' fictional abbey at Thélème. The supposed president of this club was the Devil,
although the members themselves did not apparently worship demons or the Devil, but called
themselves devils. According to a number of sources their activities included mock religious
ceremonies and partaking in meals containing dishes like Holy Ghost Pie, Breast of Venus, and
Devil's Loin, while drinking Hell-fire punch. Members of the Club supposedly came to meetings
dressed as characters from the Bible.

Wharton's club came to an end in 1721when George I, under the influence of Wharton's political
enemies (namely Robert Walpole) put forward a Bill "against 'horrid impieties'" (or immorality),
aimed at the Hellfire Club. Despite the fact that there has never been proof that Wharton's
Hellfire Club ever did more than hold mock religious ceremonies and drink excessively,
Wharton's political opposition used his membership as a way to pit him against his political
allies, thus removing him from parliament. After his Club was disbanded, Wharton became a
Freemason, and in 1722 he became the Grandmaster of England.

The most infamous club associated with the name was established in England by Sir Francis
Dashwood, and met irregularly from around 1749 to around 1760, and possibly up until 1766. Sir
Francis Dashwood and the Earl of Sandwich founded the Order of the Knights of St Francis in
1746, originally meeting at the George & Vulture. The membership of Sir Francis' club was
initially limited to twelve but soon increased. Of the original twelve, some are regularly
identified: Dashwood, Robert Vansittart, Thomas Potter, Francis Duffield, Edward Thompson, Paul
Whitehead and John Montagu, 4th Earl of Sandwich. The list of supposed members is immense;
among the more probable candidates are George Bubb Dodington, a fabulously corpulent man in
his 60s; William Hogarth, although hardly a gentleman, has been associated with the club after
painting Dashwood as a Franciscan Friar and John Wilkes, though much later, under the
pseudonym John of Aylesbury. Benjamin Franklin is also said to have occasionally attended the
club's meetings during 1758 as a non-member during his time in England. However, some authors
and historians would argue Benjamin Franklin was in fact a spy. As there are no records left (if
there were any at all), many of these members are just assumed or linked by letters sent to each
other.
Sir Francis's club used a number of other names, such as the Brotherhood of St. Francis of
Wycombe, Order of Knights of West Wycombe, The Order of the Friars of St Francis of Wycombe
and later, after moving their meetings to Medmenham Abbey, they became the Monks or Friars of
Medmenham. The first meeting at Sir Francis's family home in West Wycombe was held on
Walpurgis Night, 1752. Meetings occurred twice a month, with an annual general meeting lasting a
week or more in June or September. The members addressed each other as "Brothers" and the
leader, which changed regularly, as "Abbot". During meetings members supposedly wore ritual
clothing: white trousers, jacket and cap, while the "Abbot" wore a red ensemble of the same style.
Dashwood's Club meetings often included mock rituals, items of a pornographic nature, much
drinking, wenching and banqueting.

Francis Dashwood was much more of a trickster than his predecessor Wharton. He was well known
for his pranks: for example, while in the Royal Court in St Petersburg, he dressed up as the King
of Sweden, a great enemy of Russia. In 1762 the Earl of Bute appointed Dashwood his Chancellor of
the Exchequer, despite Dashwood being widely held to be incapable of understanding "a bar bill
of five figures". (Dashwood resigned the post the next year, having raised a tax on cider which
caused near-riots). Dashwood now sat in the House of Lords after taking up the title of Baron Le
Despencer after the previous holder died. Then there was the attempted arrest of John Wilkes for
seditious libel against the King in the notorious issue No. 45 of his The North Briton in early
1763. During a search authorized by a General warrant (possibly set up by Sandwich, who wanted
to get rid of Wilkes), a version of The Essay on Woman was discovered set up on the press of a
printer whom Wilkes had almost certainly used. The work was almost certainly principally
written by Thomas Potter, and from internal evidence can be dated to around 1755. It was
scurrilous, blasphemous, libellous, and bawdy, though not pornographic- still unquestionably
illegal under the laws of the time, and the Government subsequently used it to drive Wilkes into
exile. Between 1760 and 65 Chrysal, or the Adventures of a Guinea by Charles Johnstone was
published. It contained stories easily identified with Medmenham, one in which Lord Sandwich
was ridiculed as having mistaken a monkey for the Devil. This book sparked the association
between the Medmenham Monks and the Hellfire Club. By this time, many of the Friars were either
dead or too far away for the Club to continue as it did before. Medmenham was finished by 1766.

In 1781, Dashwood's nephew Joseph Alderson (an undergraduate at Brasenose College, Oxford)
founded the Phoenix Society (later known as the Phoenix Common Room), but it was only in 1786
that the small gathering of friends asserted themselves as a recognised institution. The Phoenix
was established in honour of Sir Francis, who died in 1781, as a symbolic rising from the ashes of
Dashwood's earlier institution, and to this day the dining society abides by many of its
predecessor's tenets. Its motto uno avulso non deficit alter (when one is torn away another
succeeds) is from the sixth book of Virgil's Aeneid and is relevant first in the more overarching
sense of having replaced the Monks of Medmenham; then in establishing the continuity of the
society through a process of constant renewal of its graduate and undergraduate members. The
Phoenix Common Room's continuous history until the present day is a matter of great pride to the
college.

- source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hellfire_Club

Quote:
In Ireland the Hell-Fire clubs were obviously inspired by Wharton but they tended to be more
harmful, flirting with crime and an ill-informed devil-worship. Limerick had a Hell-Fire Club as
did Dublin from about 1735. In Dublin records are unclear if there was one club meeting in
several locations or several distinct clubs. It’s founders were Richard Parsons, first Earl of Rosse
and Colonel Jack St Leger, a relative of the Hon. Elizabeth St Leger. Richard Parsons, 1st Earl of
Rosse, was twice Grand Master of Ireland, in 1725 and 1730. Lord Santry, Simon Luttrell "the
wicked madman", Colonels Clements, Ponsonby and St George, [were] all members of the Dublin
Hell-Fire Club which held orgies at the Eagle Tavern on Cork Hill, at Daly’s Club on College Green,
and at a hunting lodge on Montpelier Hill until the lodge burnt down and they relocated to the
Killakee Dower House farther down the same hill. They gathered to drink hot scaltheen, a mixture
of whisky and butter laced with brimstone, and to toast Satan. Rumours of orgies, black masses
and mock crucifixions are just that: rumours. Black magic was enjoying a vogue on the Continent.
"Magic, at any rate, did spread to the rakish set in Britain and Ireland, taking a dark tinge. Traces
of the Hell-Fire revival in Britain are scanty, but such as they are, they carry a more satanic
stamp than before." Edinburgh had at least one club that arranged pacts with the Devil. An Oxford
Hell-Fire Club is supposed to have flourished for several decades, one of the few references being
in a pamphlet published in 1763 attacking a clergyman named John Kedgell and accusing him of
membership. A revival of the Irish Hell-Fire Club was denounced in the 12 March, 1771
Freeman’s Journal where it was referred to as "The Holy Fathers." This group lasted about thirty
years. A late member of this group was Thomas "Buck" Whaley (1766-1800) son of "Burn-Chapel"
Whaley who was reputed to have been president of the old Dublin Hell-Fire Club. Thomas, as
ringleader, returned to Montpelier Hill and organized satanic and homosexual parties. His death
marked the decline of the club.

The Hon. Alan Dermot founded an Appalling Club in 1738, a group of seven who called themselves
the Everlastings. The last member died November 2, 1766 and all that remained of the club was its
minute book, formerly said to have been in the possession of the Masters of Jesus College,
Cambridge.

In the 1730s a Hell-Fire Club met at the George and Vulture Inn in London. Thomas De Quincey
records one story concerning an unnamed lord who tied a man to a spit, roasting him, presumably
at the George and Vulture. Hogarth’s Charity in the Cellar, painted about 1739, is presumed to be
the same club, but the case is weak. The five depicted are identifiable and can be connected with
two other alleged members, the Earl of Sandwich and Sir Francis Dashwood. Prince of Wales,
Frederick, son of George II and Queen Caroline, arrived in England in December 1728. Known as
Fred, or (to his family) Fritz, his English and education were shaky. "There is a story that he
joined a Hell-Fire Club, presumably the one at the George and Vulture." John Montagu, fourth Earl
of Sandwich—inventor of the sandwich—is unreliably named a member of the Hell-Fire Club at the
George and Vulture but was a Dilettante. He and Dashwood formed the short-lived Divan Club in
1744.

A friend of Dashwood’s, the anti-Catholic John Hall Stevenson, inherited Skelton Castle inland
from Saltburn, rechristened it Crazy Castle and established The Demoniacs. (Sutter calls them
Demoniacks.) He appointed Dashwood as Privy Counciller and practiced parody-baptisms,
assembling meetings to drink, gamble and swap dirty stories. Joseph Sterne soon ceased to attend
and on Stevenson’s death the club faded away.

Dashwood formed the Society of Dilettanti in 1732 with about 40 members. Some may have been
members of Wharton’s Hell-Fire Club. They met on the first Sunday at the Bedford Head Tavern in
Covent Garden and later at another tavern in Palace Yard. The seal of the society was a staff with
coiled serpents. William Hogarth was never close to the Dilettanti but knew Dashwood through the
Society of Beefsteaks, of which he was a founding member. Dashwood’s West Wycombe House was
their meeting place originally. Meetings in the revamped Abbey appear to have started in 1752.

Members of the Order

Mr. Clarke
Sir Francis Dashwood
Sir John Dashwood-King was the founder’s half-brother
John D'Aubrey (possibly)
George Bubb Dodington, Baron Melcombe (1691-1762)
Francis Duffield, the Abbey’s landlord
George Augustus Selwyn (August 11, 1719 - January 25, 1791), society wit and man-about-town
Sir Thomas Stapleton was a cousin of Dashwood’s
Dr. Thomas Thompson
John Tucker was an MP and mayor of Weymouth in 1754
John Montagu, fourth Earl of Sandwich
Thomas Potter, an MP and younger son of the late Archbishop of Canterbury.
Arthur Vanssittart, MP for Berkshire
Robert Vanssittart, friend of Whitehead and Hogarth
Henry Vanssittart, later Governor of Bengal
Paul Whitehead (1710 - December 1774)

An inner circle of thirteen is claimed. The membership was middle-aged and there was a turnover
with a distinct second generation drifting in after 1757, including John Wilkes, Charles
Churchill, Robert Lloyd and Dr. Benjamin Bates. Visitors such as Horace Walpole, unconnected to
the order’s activities, were frequent.

The actual activities of the order are unknown although a mockery of Christianity in general and
popery in particular, combined with a good deal of sexual innuendo, seems to have set the tone.
The chief ceremony was the reception of new members. Paul Whitehead, secretary-treasurer of the
order, and a poet of republican and atheistic tendencies, planned their ritual. He once organized a
procession of tramps and beggers to travesty an annual masonic parade. John Wilkes, who was
never an inner circle member, claimed that the rites were "English Eleusinian Mysteries".

-source: http://freemasonry.bcy.ca/history/hellfire/hellfire.html
Illuminati History 101.E::
the Bavarian Illuminati:
a communique for the IOBB2.

according to the most quoted letters of the Illuminati, found in the apartment of
Xavier Zwack, the five members of the Aeropagite Council at that time were as
follows:

Quote:
spartacus: Adam Weishaupt
cato: xavier zwack
minos: Grünberger (??)
sebastion: Cosandey (??)
philo: Baron Von Knigge

The reason to consider these five the Aeropagite (top) Council in the Bavarian
Illuminati at that time are that Zwack had direct contact with Weishaupt, as well as
direct contact with Knigge. Knigge had direct contact with Grunberger and
Cosandey, who were also professors at the same university as Knigge.

Now, the Aeropagite Council having consisted of five members at the time of its
discovery does not necessarily justify the myth that the Order had the same five
members, or even any other members than Weishaupt, when it was officially
"founded" in 1776.

Also, as we can note from the following extremely abbreviated timeline, Weishaupt
formed the Illuminati BEFORE becoming a Free Mason, however Knigge (who may,
indeed, have been one of the five original members) did not join the IO until 1780.

Quote:

May 1, 1776. Weishaupt founds the Order of the Illuminati with an original membership of five.

1777. Weishaupt is initiated into Freemasonry, in Munich, at the Lodge Theodore of Good Counsel.

July, 1780. Baron von Knigge is initiated into the Order.

April 20, 1784. Baron von Knigge resigns from the Illuminati

By 1784, largely due to Knigge's circle of influence, the Illuminati had "between two and three
thousand members."
Here is a partial list of members compiled from the member list found in Zwack's
apartment. Note that, though Knigge and Zwack are listed, Grunberger and Cosandey
are not. I see this as being further evidence that, whether founding members or not,
they were likely the remaining two other members of the five member Aeropagite
Council at the time of the Bavarian Illuminati's discovery.

Quote:

Abel, Jacob Friedrich von: Pythagoras Abderites

Baader, Ferdinand M.: Celsus
Baierhammer, Alois: Zoroaster, then Confucius
Banffy, Count
des Barres, Karl: Archelaus
Bassus, Thomas Maria De: Hannibal
Bleibtreu, Karl: Busius
Bleibtreu, Leopold: Alberoni
Bode, Johann Joachim Christoph: Amelius
Bronner, Franz Xaver: Aristoteles
Brigido, Count Joseph
Busche, Georg Baron von dem: Bayard
Cobenzl, Count Johann Ludwig von: Arrian
Cobenzl, Johann Philipp Graf von: Numa Pompilius Romanus
Compe: Aristodemes
Costanzo, Marquis Const. von: Diomedes
Dalberg, Karl Theodor, Baron Von: Baco v. Verulam
Ditfurth, Franz W. v.: Minos
Dorsch, Anton Josef: Ptolemäus Lathurus
Drexel, Anton: Pythagoras
de Duffrene (Dufresne): Maevius
Eckartshausen, Karl von: Atilius Regulus
Ecker (Egkher), Ludwig Baron von: Pericles
Ernst II, Ludwig Herzog von: Quintus Severus
Falcke, Ernst Friedrich Hector: Epimenides
Feder, Johann Georg Heinrich: Marcus Aurelius
Ferdinand, Duke von Brunswick: Aaron
Fronhofer, Ludwig: Raimundus Lullus
Goethe, Johann Wolfgang von: Abaris
Haeffelin, Kasimir Frhr. von: Philo of Byblos
Herder, Johann Gottfried von: Damasus pontifex
Hertel, Jakob Anton: Marius
Hoheneicher, Franz von Paula: Alcibiades
Hornstein, Max Frhr. von: Vespasian
Karl, August: Aeschylus
Karl, Landgraf von Hessen-Kasse: Aaron
Kapfinger, Georg: Thales milesius
Kleucker, Johann Friedrich: Terentius Varro
Knigge, Adolph Franz Friedrich Ludwig Freiherr von: Philo
Kolborn, Joseph Hieronymus Karl Freiherr von: Chrysippus
Kolowrat-Krakowsky, Count Leopold von: Numenius
Koppe, Johann Benjamin: Accacius
Kressel, Baron
Kröber, Karl: Agis
Lange, Franz Georg: Tamerlane
Lanz, Johann Jakob: Socrates
Lodron, Maximilian Graf von: Numa Pompilius graecus
Mändl, Theodor: Colbert
Massenhausen, Anton von: Ajax
Mauvillon, Jakob: Agesilaus
Meggenhofen, Ferdinand Baron von: Sulla
Metternich, Franz Georg Karl von: Ximenez
Merz, Max Edler von: Tiberius
Michl, Anton: Solon
Mieg, Johann Friedrich: Epictetus
Montgelas, Maximilian Josef Garnerin, Count von: Musaeus
Münter, Friedrich: Spinoza
Nicolai, Christoph Friedrich: Lucian
Pappenheim, Friedrich Lothar Ferdinand Graf von: Alexander
Pestalozzi, Johann Heinrich: Alfred
Poelffy, Count
Riedl, Midiael von: Euclid
Röntgen Ludwig: Averroes
Ruedorfer, Franz Xaver: Livius/Plinius minor
Ruef, Kaspar: Fabius
Sauer, Georg Conrad: Attila
Savioli-Corbelli Alexander Graf von: Brutus
Schmerber, Sigmund: Agathocles
Schröckenstein, Friedrich Freiherr von: Mahomet
Seinsheim, Maximilian Joseph Graf von: Alfred
Socher, Joseph: Hermes Trismegistus
Sonnenfels, Joseph von: Fabius - Numa pompilius romanus
Stadion, Friedrich Lothar Joseph baron von: Romulus
Stadion, Johann Philipp von: Remus
Stolberg-Rossla, Johann Martin, Count of: Ludovicus Germanicus also Campanella
Swieten, Baron Gottfried van
Tropenegro, Ernst Leopold: Coriolanus
Utzschneider, Joseph von: Hellanicus Lesbius
Weishaupt, Adam: Spartacus
Werner, Erasmus von: Menelaus
Will, Anton: Agrippa
Wundt, Karl Kasimir: Raphael
Zwack, Baron Franz Xavier von: Cato (also Danaus & Phil.-Strozzi)
Zwack, Simon: Claudius

Here, also, is a basic structure of the ranks and status of the Bavarian Illuminati as it
was originally envisioned by Weishaupt in 1776. It is unknown to me at this time how
many members were in each grade by 1784, by which time the Order was over 2000
members strong.

Quote:

1. The Nursery
1. Preparatory Literary Essay
2. Novitiate (Novice)
3. Minerval (Brethren of Minerva, Academy of Illuminism)
4. Illuminatus Minor
2. Symbolic Freemasonry
1. Apprentice
2. Fellow Craft
3. Master
1. Scots Major Illuminatus
2. Scots Illuminatus Dirigens (Directory)
3. Mysteries
1. Lesser
1. Presbyter, Priest, or Epopt
2. Prince or Regent (Prefets, Provincials, National Director, National Superiors)
2. Greater
1. Magus (5-7 Aeropagaites)
2. Rex or King

All the above quoted information I found at the following site:

-source: http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/NWO/Illuminati.htm

Scheme of Degrees.

AE Waite's "New Encyclopedia of Freemasonry wrote:

A. Preparatory Degrees
1. Novice and Teacher, almost apart as such from ceremonial procedure.
2. Academy of Illuminism, otherwise, Brethren of Minerva.
- the reception was at the end of night in a dark room.
3. Illuminatus Minor
4. Illuminatus Major, otherwise "Scottish Novice" (reflected form Masonry).
The Candidate is represented as depositing an account of his life in the hands of his Sponsor, and
this was checked by information derived from the Intelligence Department of the Order.

B. Intermediary Degree
1. Scottish Knight of Illuminsm, founded on Ecossais Grades of Masonic Chivalry and reproducing
points of their procedure. An alternative name was: Illuminatus Dirigens." The Candidate was
called upon to testify his belief that the Superiors of Illuminism were also the unknown and
lawful Superiors of Freemasonry.

C. Class of the Lesser Mysteries

1. Epopt, or Priest of Illuminism.
- the Candidate was hood-winked and driven by a circuitous route to a place of assembly. He was
brought into a brightly illuminated Temple, where was a vacant throne, by which lay the insignia
of royalty, and a cushion whereon was folded a white priestly robe and girdle. The Candidate was
to choose between them, and if he was guided rightly he became a Priest of the Order, when a part
of its policy was unveiled to him.
2. Regent or Principatus Illuminatus.
- the political aspects of the Order were developed in the Grade of Knighthood.

D. Class of the Greater Mysteries

1. Magus or Philosopher
2. Man-King.
- the last Mysteries were combined in these Degrees, but no account of their Ritual procedure has
transpired.

- source: pg. 387, Waite, AE. "New Encyclopedia of Freemasonry," Weathervane Books,
1970. ISBN: 0-517-191482
Illuminati History 101.F::
the Skull and Bones:
a communique for the IOBB2.

Quote:
Williams cousin Samuel Russell formally established Russell & Co. on January 1, 1824 for the
purpose of acquiring opium and smuggling it to China.

-source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Huntington_Russell

This is Samuel Russell, cousin of the first member of Skull and Bones, Will Russell,
and probably one of the original 13 initiates under his cousin. So, even before the
founding of the Skull and Bones itself, we have the founding member's own cousin
starting a holding company to redistribute opium to China. At this time, opium is still
legal in the British empire, and India, bordering China to the south, is still a British
colony. The British opium import to China in an attempt to crush their economy led,
of course, to the Communist Revolution under Chairman Mao Tse Tung. But we already
know all of that. What we don't yet is why some Connecticut Yankee thinks he can
corner the international opium market. So, let's look a little later on and see.

Quote:
James Smith Bush (1825–1889), an Episcopal priest in New Jersey, California, and New York, was
the son of Obadiah Bush and the father of Samuel Prescott Bush.

-source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_family#Patrilineal_line

In 1825, GHWB's Great Grand-Father is born. This makes the Bushes the latest ones "on
the scene" of the economic coup around the turn of the 20th century that
precipitated WWI and WWII, just as the "Asian Contagion" of the late 90's in many
ways led directly to the events on 9-11, 2001. So, we see here, even among the most
elite, the wealthiest, an exchange between one group or family and another over the
passing decades and centuries of the reigns to power. There is a "passing of the
torch" that occurs during GHWB's earlier lifetime, and he alone may have really
grasped the fullness of the oppurtunity this represented.
Quote:
The partnership started in 1825, between William Brown and Joseph Shipley.

-source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brown%2C_Shipley_%26_Co.

So, in the same year as "late-comer" Bush-family patriarch James Smith Bush is born,
we have the first partnership formed between two British companies that would later
partner with Harriman to form BB&H banking firm. You'll see where I'm headed with
this connection in a moment.

Quote:
Russell & Co. merged with the number one US trader, the J. & T.H. Perkins "Boston Concern" in
1829.

-source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Huntington_Russell

Returning to the Bonesmen's founder's cousin's company, Russell and Co. (R&Co), in
1829, they have aligned themselves to the current, proto-Wall Street, open-market
share / stock-trader of the time. Remember all of this is happenning roughly
concurrent to a wee little skirmmish going on down south we "historiographers" call
the Civil War. Meanwhile, and this is important, future partners R&Co. have already
aligned with BB&H, then Brown & Shipley, via Skull and Bones. So, before the Civil
War in America is even fought-out, we have Connecticut international-opium
entrepeneur Sam Russell, cousin of the founder of Skull and Bones, Will Russell, who
I'll come to next, selling shares in his startup company on the open-market. So, who's
buying this? You'll never guess.

Quote:
From 1831 to 1832, Russell studied in Germany. It has been suggested while there, he was
initiated into a German society that inspired Skull and Bones. Confirmation of this came when the
Skull and Bones meeting hall was broken into and materials were found that refer to Skull and
Bones as the Yale Chapter of a German society. The German "Illuminati" was outlawed as effected
by an edict of the Bavarian government in 1785 and it is assumed that they then became a truly
secretive underground organization.

One account of the society's foundation says Russell was secretary of the Yale University chapter
of Phi Beta Kappa. It is said that Russell was furious when a prominent undergraduate scholar was
left out of the Phi Beta Kappa elections and Russell openly condemned the fraternity. He joined
with the undergraduate and thirteen other students to found the Eulogian Club, which later
became known as Skull and Bones.

-source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Huntington_Russell

From the start, Skull and Bones was a front.

On the one-hand, there's the fact that the alignment of the Russell family, between
Sam Russell and his cousin Will, with the German "Illuminati" (by that time known as
Thule), allowed quid pro quo between the German (and British, as we'll soon see)
foreign investors, who needed espionage agents abroad in America, and the young
up-and-comer in the international opium trade. So we have, on the one-hand, the
"secret society" aspect being used as a cover for the business-deals. But, on the other
hand, it's the other way around, and what we see is that one "hand" washes the other.
So, Skull and Bones was a cover for the opium export industry, but the opium-export
industry was only a front for the Skull and Bones connection between Yale college
kids - mostly the sons of boot-strapped wealthy big-industrialists following the Civil
War, like Prescott Bush, GHWB's dad, himself -and the proto-NAZI party, the
Illuminati / Thule Society, in Germany. Beginning to see things shaping up yet?

Quote:
Founders
• William Huntington Russell (1832), Connecticut State Legislator
• Alphonso Taft (1832), U.S. Attorney General (1876–1877); Secretary of War (1876);
Ambassador to Austria-Hungary (1882) and Russia (1884–1885); father of William Howard Taft

-source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Skull_and_Bones_members

So, the fellow-Phi Beta Kappa frat-boy who Russell, the Thule-brainwashed cousin of
the first Cino-American opium exporter, "stood up for" was actually the father of
President Taft. Did anyone know that Taft was elected illegally, since his home-state,
Ohio, at the time of his election, still had not been ratified into the Union of American
States following the civil war? Fun fact, that.

Quote:
Members meet in the Bones "tomb" on Thursday and Sunday evenings of each week over the course
of their senior year. As with other Yale societies, the sharing of a personal history is the
keystone of the senior year together in the tomb. Reputedly, members are assigned a nickname.
For Bones, it is said that these names are associated with Roman mythology, while at Scroll and
Key the names are associated with Greek mythology, and with Egyptian mythology at Wolf's Head.

-source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boodle_Boys

Okay, well, this part does get a little esoteric, or at least exotic. So we have three yale
frat houses formed around the same time. The first is Skull and Bones. We've already
seen that they are aligned with the German Thule Society and with the Chinese /
British opium-trade. The second one to form then was the Scroll and Key. Let's check
them out briefly.

Quote:
The Scroll and Key Society is a secret society established by John Addison Porter and others at
Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, in 1841.

-source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scroll_and_Key

So, after Skull and Bones, that already by that time is, at the least, well lined up to
connect the German Thule Order's interests in the British export of opium to China
via the founders' own family-ties, then next we have the second Yale frat / "secret
society," Scroll and Key. I'm not going to go into specifics on Scroll and Key, or on the
"third society" of Wolf's Head, either. Suffice it to say that it's all about time-travel.
And if you get that, maybe you'd be interested in this watch I have to sell you.

Quote:
The Russell Trust Association is the business name for the New Haven, Connecticut based Skull
and Bones society, incorporated in 1856.

-source:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brown_Brothers_Harriman_%26_Co.#Skull_.26_Bones_
Association
So, between the formation of the second "cult" at Yale and the formation of the third,
Skull and Bones officially declares itself a financial operating arm of the elder R&Co.
run by the founder's own cousin. Now we're talking nepitism and campus politics
galore. Skull and Bones is now corporate-financed, the RTA (Russell Trust
Association) being nothing more than a holding company under R&Co. (Sam Russell
and Company). Again, this is far from illegal, but then, laws change.

Quote:
James Smith Bush (1825–1889), an Episcopal priest in New Jersey, California, and New York, ...
son of Obadiah Bush and the father of Samuel Prescott Bush.... [was t]he first Bush to earn a degree
from Yale University, he supported the founding of The Third Society at Yale, now known as Wolf's
Head Society.

-source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_family#Patrilineal_line

Here's a smoking gun right at the peak of the Yale frat-wars. The great-grandfather
of former head of the CIA and past-president GHWB helped found a RIVAL frat to
Skull and Bones, the frat that, I shouldn't need to remind you, became the CIA. I'll get
back to this "frat-mole" theory in a moment, but for now suffice it to say it's all about
maintaining the false value of certain commodities at the expense, literally, of
certain others - for example we consider gold "worth" more than opium, as I'll tally at
the bottom line later on. Again, I'm going chronologically, so bear with me. The Yale
"three societies" are just the calm before the blitzkrieg. Although, while we're on
them, I'd like to add, on the time-travel note, the order of attribution to historical
reference-point for the three clubs is actually opposite the order in which they,
themselves, were formed. Think about it. The Roman club (S&B) was formed FIRST.
Then the Greek club (S&K), and finally, the Egyptian club (WHS). It's just an
interesting side-note is all, really; it just makes you wonder what they were thinking
about.

Quote:
Wolf's Head Society (W.H.S.), incorporated in 1883 as The Third Society by the Phelps Trust
Association, is the third oldest secret society at Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.

-source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wolf%27s_Head_%28secret_society%29

By the time Wolf's Head Society forms, 51 years AFTER S&B, and only 6 years before
JSBush (Sam's father, Prescot's grand-father, GHWB's great-grandfather) dies, the
idea of establishing a business-side has been decided to be pre-eminent in the
formation of a successfully operating "secret" frat. I'd speculate that, what's MORE
secret than the existence of these rival Yale frats are the Secret Wars they conduct
against one another. How far does this mentality extend into the Halls of Power in our
governments by now? In any event, the Phelps Trust precedes the formation of
Wolf's Head, and this may have been due to the influence of GHWB's great-
grandfather. But, either way, we can say that Bonesman GHWB's own great-
grandfather actually belonged to a rival frat to the Skull and Bones, Wolf's Head.
Again, the notion of the "frat-mole" raises its ugly, speculative little head.

Quote:
In 1918 the partnership between Brown Shipley and its American partners Brown Brothers & Co.
ended, although each continued to act as agents for the other for some time.

-source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brown%2C_Shipley_%26_Co.
Id' guess this had something to do with the Communist Revolution in Russia in 1917,
leading into the Great War, the War to End All Wars, or, as we know it by name
nowadays, World War One. Brown Shipley (ostensibly the British/UK operating wing)
of BBH (Brown-Brothers & Co, by now Brown Brothers & Harriman, USA) at this point
claims to have severed official ties with BBH, their American operating wing, at least
on paper. What is meant by the ominous use of the word "agents" I'll explain next.
But, going into this, remember that, what we are looking at is one group, with three
sides: BBS/BBH are the Harriman / Walker / Bush family bankers. RTA and R&Co. are
Skull and Bones dealing British opium to China. And then we have the third group,
the Thule Order of Illuminati, who were, by now, calling themselves by the name no
doubt more familiar to us now, the NAZIs.

Quote:
Harriman Bank was the main Wall Street connection for several German companies and the varied
U.S. financial interests of Fritz Thyssen....

Roosevelt's Alien Property Custodian, Leo T. Crowley, signed Vesting Order Number 248 seizing
Bush's property under the Trading with the Enemy Act. The order cited only the Union Banking
Corporation (UBC), of which Bush was a director and held one share, which had connections with a
Dutch bank owned by Thyssen.

Union Banking Corporation (UBC) (for Thyssen and Brown Brothers Harriman). The President of
UBC at that time was George Herbert Walker, Bush's father-in-law.

• E. Roland Harriman--3991 shares (managed and under voting control of Prescott Bush)

• Cornelis Lievense--4 shares (He was the New York banker of the Nazi Party)

• Harold D. Pennington--1 share (Employed by Prescott Bush at Brown Brothers Harriman)

• Ray Morris--1 share (a business partner of the Bush and Harriman families)

• Prescott S. Bush--1 share (director of UBC, which was co-founded and sponsored by his father-
in-law George Walker; senior managing partner for E. Roland Harriman and Averell Harriman)

• H.J. Kouwenhoven--1 share (organized UBC for Von Thyssen, managed UBC in Nazi occupied
Netherlands)

• Johann G. Groeninger--1 share (German Industrial Executive, a not unimportant member of the
Nazi party

-source:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prescott_Bush#Nazi_collaboration_controversy

Okay, this is very important, so I'll go over it for a moment more. I know it's
confusing and I don't want us to miss this before moving on. Seven people sat on the
board of directors for the UBC (Union Banking Corporation). Three of them were
high-level members in Hitler's NAZI party. Two of them were business partners of
the Bush family. The other two were the owner of the company (E. Roland Harriman),
and the company president's son-in-law, Prescott Bush, GHWB's dad. Prescot's father-
in-law (George Herbert Walker), for whom Prescott named his first-born son, was not
mentioned as part of the crew of stock-holders who got "busted" for "trading with the
enemy," even though he was UBC's president at the time. Also note that Harriman's
interests, despite being the overwhelmingly primary stock-holder on the board of
trustees, are under direct veto of Prescott, the president's son-in-law. This is alot of
trust that Harriman is putting in "Bert" Walker, letting his friend's son-in-law run a
company complicit in "trading with the enemy" during war-time. Either way, the
point is clear: Prescott Bush was NOT a NAZI-"sympathiser." Prescott Bush WAS a
NAZI. And this is the grand-father of our current president, George W. Bush. How do
they get away with this? Well, I'll tell you how:

Quote:
In 1943, by special act of the Connecticut state legislature, its trustees were granted an
exemption from filing corporate reports with the Secretary of State, which is normally a
requirement.

-source:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brown_Brothers_Harriman_%26_Co.#Skull_.26_Bones_
Association

This means that, as of 1943, the year that Prescott's "banking" venture with the NAZIs
was being investigated, the Skull and Bones opium company stopped having to report
their annual income and holdings to the state auditor. So, RTA went "off the books,"
in other words. No taxes, no official records. Let the age of the frat-house "spooks"
begin. Well, I expect you're wondering, what does the one thing have to do with the
other? It's time to play clean-up. What we have, up until Crowley under Roosevelt put
the slap-down on Prescott and Thyssen's US-NAZI funding party, was a gradual lining
up between pro-eugenics, fascist forces in Germany and frat-houses on the Yale
University campus. And Prescott himself was in a VERY Key Position. The grandson
of a Wolf's Head, he himself had been "tapped" into Skull and Bones. Was this a
betrayal, or espionage? Either way, we have Prescott Bush in charge of UBC for BB&H
(UK/US) and Thyssen (Germany) at the same time that future BB&H asset RTA goes
"off the charts." Is this a coincidence, or can we imply complicity to conceal the
original interests of the UBC (US/UK - German) alliance as being, as I've been saying
all along, in selling opium to the Chinese? Is it the case that post-civil war-era proto-
fascists originally aligned in the drug-trade, and only later moved into the business
of banking? Well, as we all know by now, "looks can be deceiving."

Quote:
In 1946, Brown Shipley became a limited company.

-source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brown%2C_Shipley_%26_Co.

This is when the UK wing of BBH, ie. Brown Shipley, says it finally "pulled out" of its
side of the trade partnership. But, of course, this is only on paper. As we can begin to
see now, there had been complicity between UK Brown Shipley and US BBH between
1918, when it declared itself an autonomously functional branch, and 1946, when it
actually began selling stock-shares on the open-market. We have now seen some of
the "agents" that acted for both UK BS and US BBH simultaneously, on behalf, on the
one hand, of the British interest in poisoning China, and, on the other hand, the
German fascists in consolidating capital. And, oh My ~GOD~ have they ever
consolidated capital. Let's look at the final piece of the puzzle.

Quote:
Since 1978, business of the Russell Trust Association was handled by its single trustee, Brown
Brothers Harriman & Co. partner John B. Madden, Jr. Madden started with Brown Brothers &
Harriman in 1946, under senior partner Prescott Bush, George Herbert Walker Bush's father.
-source:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brown_Brothers_Harriman_%26_Co.#Skull_.26_Bones_
Association

The guy who handles the stock portfolio for the Skull and Bones, "off the books"
opium-trade industry worked with Prescott Bush HIMSELF at BB&H itself, which had,
by 1946, hired Prescott to protect him from the UBC banking scandal of 1943. So, let's
take stock once more: Prescott Bush: grandson of a Wolf's Head (Egyptian Yale cult),
who himself became a Skull and Bonesman (Roman Yale cult); a known NAZI-
"collaborator" who "traded with the enemy" during wartime; working for BB&H and
even supervising the guy who would end up acquring S&B RTA for WHS BB&H.
Starting to add up? BBH subsumed RTA, but it's likely that BB&H was founded to fund
RTA. In any event, we can definately now sit back and say, with the utmost
confidence, we know that Prescott Bush, our current president's grand-father, was a
NAZI, and that Skull and Bones, the Bush family's college fraternity of choice for the
last three generations, makes its money in the opium trade. So, exactly how much
money does Skull and Bones make from the opium trade?

Quote:
On its 2004 Form 990, the Russell Trust Association reported $3,205,143 in net assets.

-source:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brown_Brothers_Harriman_%26_Co.#Skull_.26_Bones_
Association

So, RTA (the Cino opium-exporter) is now worth approxmately 3 and a quarter million
dollars. But check this out. Between 1946, when Brown Shipley went public-interest
on its stock-options, and now, in 2007, UK BS (former partners of US BB&H) have been
bought out by, and now function as a wholly owned subsidiary of KBC bank in
Luxembourg. Let's just take a quick look into their assets and earnings for a moment,
just to see how the business of housing NAZI gold is holding up beside the old opium
trade.

Quote:
The group is controlled by a syndicate of core shareholders, but has a free float of some 47%. Its
market capitalisation in November 2005 was Eu.27bn, and its revenues Eu. 12.556 bn in 2006.
KBL, based in Luxemburg, provides tailor-made private banking services to customers throughout
Western Europe via its network of subsidiaries.

Members of the group currently include Puilaetco Dewaay (Belgium), Michaux Gestion SA
(France), Merck Finck & Co. (Germany), Brown, Shipley & Co. (Great Britain), Banca KBL Fumagalli
Soldan Spa (Italy), Theodoor Gilissen Bankiers NV (The Netherlands), and Kredietbank Suisse SA
(Switzerland).

-source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KBC_Bank

Let's also recall that the Euro is at nearly -.200% trading rate to the US dollar right
now. The reason should be clear enough. The Euro is backed off NAZI gold, while the
US dollar is not. So, when we look at the sum of 27 billion Euros in extended assets for
the Swiss bank that owns UK BS, that really translates to between two and three times
that amount in the value of US dollars. Now compare that to the average value of RTA,
at around three to four million dollars. It's literally chump change.
Illuminati History 101.G::
the Golden Dawn:
a communique for the IOBB2.

Quote:
Much of the hierarchical structure for the Golden dawn came from the Societas Rosicruciana in
Anglia, which was itself derived from the Order of the Golden and Rosy Cross.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hermetic_Order_of_the_Golden_Dawn#Structure_and_
Grades

As we shall see in a moment, though there was a definite inspiration from these prior
Orders' degree systems for the co-members of both who founded the GD, we cannot
claim the degree system of the GD is exactly identical to that of the SRIA nor the Order
of the G&RC. In point of fact, the GD restored to these their originally intended, and
thus most proper, order.

First, however, let us look at the history of these prior, Rosicrucian societies and
Orders that supposedly inspired the degree system of the GD.

Quote:
The Order of the Golden and Rosy Cross (Orden des Gold- und Rosenkreutz, also the Fraternity of
the Golden and Rosy Cross) was a German Rosicrucian organization founded in the 1750s by
Freemason and alchemist Hermann Fichtuld.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Order_of_the_Golden_and_Rosy_Cross

That this is an "Order" implies that its members held ranks according to the chivalric
code degree-system used by royalist Knights to this day. Thus, we can postulate that
this Order would comprise the earlier, elder and thus "higher" or "supernal" order to
the later "Society" of the same affiliations. However, bear in mind that the
"Rosicrucians" had been around prior to this Order since the early 1600's, when the
fama, confessio and chemycal wedding were originally published. Because of this, we
can speculate that this "Order" was formed to mark the conclusion of the Rosicrucian
movment in much the same way as the modern OTO marked the accomplishment of
the goals of the Illuminati.
Quote:
Societas Rosicruciana in Anglia (Rosicrucian Society of England) is a Masonic esoteric Christian
order formed by Robert Wentworth Little and Kenneth Mackenzie in 1865

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Societas_Rosicruciana_in_Anglia

Following from this, we can thus see how the "Society" model of latter-day
Rosicrucians reflects the "Scottish Rite" concept, following the chivalric "Order" of
the G&RC, which in turn reflects the earlier "York Rite" of appendent to the Blue
Lodge degrees. Just as the York Rite precedes the Scottish Rite, and is considered
equivalent to the "chivalric" degress of Scottish Rite, so too does the chivalric "Order"
of the G&RC act as the superior predecessor of the "Society" of the same, which in
turn is alike the Scottish Rite's inferior "philosophical" degrees, appendent between
the Blue Lodge and chivalric degrees. In short, as the Above (either chivalric York
rite Masonry or the Order of the G&RC) is elder, so Below (either philosophical
Scottish rite Masonry or the SRIA) is younger. This formula is key to comprehending
the method of descent and abolition of governmental structures, as such are applied
in the occult degree systems used during such times. Just as the Order of Rosicrucians
gave way to the SRIA, so too did the BOL give way to the OTO. Such is the perpetual
cycle.

Now, to return to the exact structures of the crypto-Rosicrucian / Illuminati-era

degree systems that inspired that of the GD. I mentioned they differed between the
Order, the Society and the GD versions. The difference is in the number of their
schools, and the number of degrees or grades within each of these schools. The Order
of the G&RC, as incorporated into Scottish rite Masonry as the "philosophical"
degrees, and the SRIA, incorporated into York rite Masonry as chivalric ranks, have
different numbers of degrees than their culmination cult, the GD, equivalent for the
Rosicrucian movement to the beginning of the Illuminati-era.

While the SRIA / G&RC degree system has 9 degrees in 4 schools, the GD has an
additional supernal degree, equivalent to the single chief governor of the entire
Order's administration. This is how all liberal-Democratic movements are gradually
converted into conservative-Republican movements, oposed to their inevitable
conversion into imperialist-Dictatorships. Here is the degree system of the SRIA:

Quote:
1st Order
• Grade I - Zelator
• Grade II - Theoricus
• Grade III - Practicus
• Grade IV - Philosophus

2nd Order
• Grade V - Adeptus Minor
• Grade VI - Adeptus Major
• Grade VII - Adeptus Exemptus

3rd Order
• Grade VIII - Magister
• Grade IX - Magus

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Societas_Rosicruciana_in_Anglia#Structure_and_Gove
rnance
And here is the degree system of the GD, as expressed in this diagram by Crowley:
Here is the same degree system listed, as opposed to diagramed according to the
contemporary "Tree of Life" diagram of ha QBLH:

Quote:
First Order
• Introduction—Neophyte 0=0
• Zelator 1=10
• Theoricus 2=9
• Practicus 3=8
• Philosophus 4=7

Second Order (R.R. et A.C.)

• Intermediate—Portal Grade
• Adeptus Minor 5=6
• Adeptus Major 6=5
• Adeptus Exemptus 7=4

Third Order
• Magister Templi 8=3
• Magus 9=2
• Ipsissimus 10=1

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hermetic_Order_of_the_Golden_Dawn#Structure_and_
Grades

By adding the degree of "Ipsissimus" to the crypto-Rosicrucian's degree system, the

"neo-Sethians" or psychic-conspirators within the Order of Death's bund of schools
completed the collonialisation of the liberal-Democratic Rosicrucian movement. The
liberal-Democratic "Order" became the conservative-Republican "Society," and this
became the imperialist-Dictatorship of the GD. The first "Ipsissimus" or dictator of the
GD administraton over the crypto-Rosicrucian movement was Aleister Crowley,
whom, as we have already mentioned, was also put in charge of re-structuring the
OTO degree-system (from the 90° RoM&M) to reflect that of the GD.

In the same way the Illuminati Order (as the BoL) became the OTO (based on the GD),
the GD itself was only the resolution of the Rosicrucian movement, bringing the
Rosicrucian degree system up-to-date with the origins of the IO. The GD's degree
system was similar to the SRIA, but addended a single, dictator-degree. Likewise, the
OTO took the IO's originally 11 grade degree system and compressed the 90° of RoM&M
into it using the GD's 10° system.

There remains, always, an "inner-Order" and an "outer-Order," not only within

Orders as schools of grades or degrees, but between Orders of the Bund as well. The
"inner-Order" of Rosicrucians used the GD degree system from 1600 on, but only made
their original cipher-manuscripts public after the end of the subsequent IO-era. The
"inner-Order" of the IO practised anarcho sex-magick from 1776 until 1900, when
they became known instead as the OTO. The "inner-Order" of the OTO are now (2010)
the richest and most militarily powerful elite the world has ever known. Just as John
Dee was the first "inner-head of the Order" of the G&RC, so too was Aleister Crowley
the first "outer-head of the Order" of the OTO.
Illuminati History 101.H::
the OTO:
a communique for the IOBB2.

Let's start with this brief description of the relationships between some of the
founding members of the OTO (prior to Crowley):

Quote:
The discussions between Reuss and Kellner did not lead to any positive results at the time,
because Reuss was very busy with a revival of the Order of Illuminati along with his associate
Leopold Engel (1858-1931) of Dresden. Kellner did not approve of the revived Illuminati Order or
of Engel. According to Reuss, upon his final separation with Engel in June 1902, Kellner
contacted him and the two agreed to proceed with the establishment of Ordo Templi Orientis by
seeking authorizations to work the various rites of high-grade Masonry. Reuss and Kellner
together prepared a brief manifesto for their Order in 1903, which was published the next year in
The Oriflamme. Kellner died on June 7, 1905.

- source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carl_Kellner_(mystic)

Basically, what we are seeing here is the final "revival" of the IO, occuring between
Theodore Reuss (German) and Leopold Engel (Irish). Now, the OTO would be founded
later between Reuss and Kellner, but at this point, just prior to the formation of the
OTO, these same two people are apparently at odds with one another of the "revived
IO" of Reuss of Engel. Well, let's find out: "WHY"?

Quote:
Carl Kellner and Paschal Beverly Randolph were members. In Theodor Reuss' 1917 O.T.O.
Constitution, it states in Article 1, Section 1:

Under the style and title: ANCIENT ORDER OF ORIENTAL TEMPLARS, an organization, formerly
known as: "The Hermetic Brotherhood of Light", has been reorganized and reconstituted. This
reconstituted association is an international organization, and is hereinafter referred to as the
O.T.O.

- source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hermetic_Brotherhood_of_Light

So, Reuss' and Engel's name for their revived IO was originally Frates Lucis, the
"Brotherhood of Light," which had considered itself an operating body loyal to the
"Hermetic Brotherhood of Luxor," previously.

Just as an aside regarding the Hermetic Brotherhood of Luxor, prior to the dissolution
of its last working group in 1900, when that group was reformed into the OTO:

Quote:
The order's teachings drew heavily from the magico-sexual theories of Paschal Beverly Randolph,
who influenced groups such as the Ordo Templi Orientis (O.T.O.) (later headed by Aleister
Crowley) (Greenfield 1997) although it is not clear whether or not Randolph himself was actually
a part of the Order.

Prior to the rise of the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn in 1888 the HBoL was the only order
that taught practical occultism in the Western Mystery Tradition. Among its members were a
number of occultists, spiritualists, and Theosophists. Initial relations between the Order and the
Theosophical Society were cordial, with most members of the order also prominent members of the
T.S.

Later there was a falling out, as the Order was opposed to the eastern-based teachings of the later
Blavatsky (Davidson considered that Blavatsky had fallen under the influence of "a greatly
inferior Order, belonging to the Budhist [sic] Cult"). Conversely, the conviction in 1886 of the
Secretary of the Order, Thomas Henry Burgoyne for fraud, was claimed by the Theosophists to
show the immorality of the Order.

- source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hermetic_Brotherhood_of_Luxor

Oh, I'm sorry, what's that you say? The rituals of the BoL were "magico-sexual" in
nature, and this group split apart from more theoretical and mythological Theosophy
as a more practical, ritual-based cult? Yes, and the last "lodge" of the BoL became the
first Lodge of the OTO. So, what practises changed, and what stayed the same between
the last lodge of the "revived IO" and the first lodge of the modern cult behind the
NWO?

Quote:
Origins
The early history of O.T.O. is difficult to trace reliably. It originated in Germany or Austria
between 1895 and 1906. Its apparent founder was Carl Kellner (probably with the German
spelling Karl), a wealthy Austrian industrialist, in 1895 (although nothing verifiable is known of
the Order until 1904).

Theodor Reuss (1855-1923) collaborated with Kellner in creating O.T.O., and succeeded him as
head of O.T.O. after Kellner's death. Under Reuss, charters were given to occult brotherhoods in
France, Denmark, Switzerland, the U.S.A. and Austria. There were nine degrees, of which the first
six were Masonic.

In 1902, Reuss, along with Franz Hartmann and Henry Klein, purchased the right to perform the
Rite of Memphis and Mizraim of Freemasonry, the authority of which was confirmed in 1904 and
again in 1905. Although these rites are considered to be irregular, they, along with the
Swedenborg Rite formed the core of the newly established Order.

- source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ordo_Templi_Orientis#Origins

So, to recap, we have the last lodge of the IO and the first lodge of the OTO. They are
one and the same. They changed some practises to quit being the IO and adopted some
to become the OTO. Thus began the NWO, the New Age "Aeon" of "Aiwass," the "Equinox
of the Gods," etc. We know the later IO was influenced by the "magico-sexual" theories
of Beverly Randolph, who was also a founding member of the OTO. However, now, we
also see that this group of occultists definitively quit being an IO operating body that
was only "influenced" by magico-sexual concepts, and took up being a specifically
operating body that practised the "Rites of Memphis and Mizraim." So, just what are
these "rites of memphis and mizraim"? Wikipedia has this to say:

Quote:
From as early as 1738, one can find traces of this Rite filled with alchemical, occult and Egyptian
references, with a structure of 90 degrees. Joseph Balsamo, called Cagliostro, a key character of
his time, gave the Rite the impulse necessary for its development. Very close to the Grand Master
of the Order of the Knights of Malta, Manuel Pinto de Fonseca. Cagliostro founded the Rite of High
Egyptian Masonry in 1784. Between 1767 and 1775 he received the Arcana Arcanorum, which are
three very high hermetic degrees, from Sir Knight Luigi d’Aquino, the brother of the national
Grand Master of Neapolitan Masonry. In 1788, he introduced them into the Rite of Misraïm and
gave a patent to this Rite.

It developed quickly in Milan, Genoa and Naples. In 1803, it was introduced by Joseph, Michel
and Marc Bedaridde. During this period of time, the Rite recruited not only aristocrats but
Bonapartists and Republicans, and sometimes even revolutionary Carbonari.

It was forbidden in 1817, following the incident of the Four Sergeants of La Rochelle and the
uneasiness caused by the Carbonari. Lodges became meeting-places for opponents to the regime,
which led to the decline of the Rite, and around 1890, the last Masons of the Rite regrouped in the
only remaining Lodge: Arc-en-Ciel.

- source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rite_of_Memphis-Misraim

WOW. So, first of all, the RoM&M form a link between Napolean-sympathising
Knights of Malta in France and the Italian Carbonari (the "black hand" who
assassinated Arch-Duke Ferdinand of Austria and began WWI). That in itself is
amazing. Both of these are deeply politically motivated organisations; both are
precursors to such round-table think tanks as the CFR or the Soviet Duma. The
Knights of Malta claim both Catholic sanction for their charter, and direct descent of
lineage from the church-purged Knights Templar. The Carbonari were post-Marx,
pre-Marxism, global anarchists. I won't bother linking to more on these groups, as I
discuss both at length already on this forum, here:

http://www.benpadiah.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=438
(NEXUS004 : macrocon :: the cult of sleep and the order of death)

So, obviously we see the RoM&M became "unpopular" once it became associated with
the Carbonari, Italian anarchists. Let's pause briefly over the "Four Sergeants Affair"
that ultimately doomed the RoM&M until it's "revival" in the form of the OTO, a few
generations later.

Quote:
The Four Sergeants of La Rochelle (Boris, Goubin, Pommier and Raoulx) were guillotined in Paris
in 1822. Their great courage initiated a liberal campaign and they became legendary.

They became particularly popular figures amongst the carbonari in Italy. The flag used by the
Four Sergeants was once owned by Prince Jérôme Bonaparte. It is a French Tricolor bearing the
slogans Constitution and Napoleon II on one side and Honour and Fatherland on the other.

The flag was used by the carbonari ventes between 1821 and 1822. It was seen during the plot of
the 29th line regiment in Belfort, then in Paris, and finally in La Rochelle where it was preserved.
It passed through the hands of the Lieutenant-Colonel Caron, then to M. Dubourjal, then to
Marquis d'Audan who finally offered it to Prince Napoleon in 1888.

- source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four_Sergeants_of_La_Rochelle

So, the "Four Sergeants Affair" basically describes the equivalent for this pre-NAZI
movement (to, in this case, restore an empire guised as a republic) of their own
version of the NAZI "blutfahne" (blood flag). The idealogy of both organisations was
the same: create political dischord as a means of rapidly achieving political power.
The slogan of the "Four Sergeants" Blood-Flag was "Honor" and "Fatherland." In
short, patriotic nationalism, the same agenda of the NAZIs.

Now, we've looked at the brief history of the RoM&M, seeing that they tie together
some very important and influential figures of world history immediately prior to
the beginnig of WWI, in which the Carbonari themselves were specifically culpable.
If you need to look the conspiracy for global domination in the face during the years
1800 - 1900, you need only look toward the RoM&M. But before we can look at just
what the RoM&M is, we have to also consider the Rites of Swedenborg, the other
primary component of the original degree system of the pre-Crowley OTO.

Quote:
The Swedenborg Rite or Rite of Swedenborg was a fraternal order modeled on Freemasonry and
based upon the teachings of Emanuel Swedenborg. It comprised six Degrees: Apprentice, Fellow
Craft, Master Neophyte, Illuminated Theosophite, Blue Brother, and Red Brother.

It was created in Avignon in 1773 by the Marquis de Thorn. It was initially a political
organization, whose aims were to bring freemasonry into disrepute, although the political
ideology was eventually discarded from the rite. This version of the Swedenborg Rite died out
within a decade of its founding.

Starting in the 1870s, the Rite was resurected as a hermetic organization. This version faded out
sometime around 1908. The Rite is now extinct, but influenced the development of other groups
such as Ordo Templi Orientis.

- source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swedenborg_Rite

So, the Swedenborg rite originated among an economic elite, but as a means of
defaming and discrediting Free Masonry. If this is the case, then why would the OTO
choose to adopt it's structure and tenants, unless it meant to slander Masonry?
However, if this was the case, then why did the OTO seek Masonic charter (granted
Oriental) to practise the RoM&M? Well, the whole lynchpin of the argument stems
down to what the RoM&M really are.

For an example of the flowery depiction of their order by the modern practitioners of
the RoM&M, consider this list of names of past Grand Masters, and descritions of
various lodges active when, all over the world, which can be found on scribd:

http://www.scribd.com/doc/13157994/A-Complete-History-of-the-Ancient-and-
Primitive-Right

Now, that is what the OTO has to say about itself. Now contrast that to this excerpt from
Francis King, a highly reliable scholar on early 20th century occult groups, from his
book: the "Secret Inner Order Rituals of the OTO."

Quote:
I
Take a suitable woman willing to aid thee in this Work. Explain to her fully the precautions to be
taken and the manner of life necessary. Let her horoscope be, if possible, suited to the nature of
the homunculus proposed; as, to have an incarnate Spirit of Benevolence let Jupiter be rising in
Pisces with good aspects of Sol, Venus, and Luna; and with no notable contrary dispositions; or so
far as may be possible.

II

Take now a man suitable; if convenient, thyself or some other Brother Initiate of the Gnosis; and so
far as may be, let his horoscope also harmonize with the nature of the work.

III

Let the man and woman copulate continuously (but especially at times astrologically favourable to
thy working) and that in a ceremonial manner in a prepared temple, whose particular arrangement
and decoration is also suitable to thy work. And let them will ardently and constantly the success
of thy work denying all other desires. Thus proceed until impregnation results.

- source: http://www.benpadiah.com/otherstuff/elib/magick/OTO.pdf
(pg. 187 of the 247 long pdf. doc.,
under the section heading: "OF THE HOMUNCULUS : A Secret Instruction of the Ninth
Degree")

This is the ninth degree "knowledge lecture" of the original OTO, to which Crowley
joined in 1910, and which he took over in 1912. You won't find this same knowledge
lecture in any of the modern publications circulated within the OTO as OTO-based
material. However, this is the basis for the OTO. Compare the ritual of the
"Homunculus" to Crowley's 1917 novel "Moon Child":

Quote:
In this work, numerous acquaintances of Crowley appear as thinly disguised fictional characters.
Crowley portrays MacGregor Mathers as the primary villain, including him as a character named
SRMD, using the abbreviation of Mathers' magical name. Arthur Edward Waite appears as a villain
named Arthwaite, and the unseen head of the Inner Circle of which SRMD was a member, "A.B." is
theosophist Annie Besant. Among Crowley's friends and allies Allen Bennett appears as Mahatera
Phang, Isadora Duncan appears as Lavinia King,and Mary D'Este as Lisa la Giuffria. Cyril Grey is
Crowley himself, while Simon Iff is either an idealized version of an older and wiser Crowley or
his friend Allen Bennett.

A year or so before the beginning of World War I, a young woman named Lisa la Giuffria is
seduced by a white magician, Cyril Grey, and persuaded into helping him in a magical battle with
a black magician and his black lodge. Grey is attempting to raise the level of his force by
impregnating the girl with the soul of an ethereal being — the moonchild. To achieve this, she will
have to be kept in a secluded environment, and many preparatory magical rituals will be carried
out. The black magician Douglas is bent on destroying Grey’s plan. However, Grey's ultimate
motives may not be what they appear. The moonchild rituals are carried out in southern Italy, but
the occult organizations are based in Paris and England. At the end of the book, the war breaks
out, and the white magicians support the Allies, while the black magicians support the Central
Powers.

- source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moonchild_(novel)

Sounds like nonsense? Well, after Crowley took over the OTO from it's last surviving
founding member, he changed the degree structure to reflect the ten degrees used
(or rather, to Crowley, implied) by the Golden Dawn's degree structure. He kept the
"essental (magico-sexual) characteristics" of the 90° RoM&M, and apparently greatly
diminished the more "Masonic" Swedenborg Rite connextions. However, by no means
did the RoM&M practise of sex-magick end when Crowley re-ordered the degree
system of the OTO. The group-focus remains, to this day, on sexual-magick. Consider
that one generation after Crowley, Jack Parsons (head of NASA's solid rocket-fuel
dept. the JPL) and L. Ron Hubbard (founder of Scientology) were devout OTO
members, who performed a magical-sexual ritual called the "Babalon Working" to,
again, create a Moon-child or Homonculus.

Quote:
The Babalon Working was a series of magic ceremonies or rituals commenced on March 2, 1946 by
Jack Parsons, essentially designed to manifest an individual incarnation of the archetypal divine
feminine called Babalon, as well as to catalyze the reification of that force as it exists latently in
every man and woman. During the ceremony L. Ron Hubbard acted as a scribe noting the results of
the magickal workings. When Parsons declared that the first of the series of rituals was complete
and successful, he almost immediately met Marjorie Cameron in his own home, and regarded her as
the creation of the ritual, considered her his "Scarlet Woman", and soon began the next stage of
the series--an attempt to conceive a child through sexual magick workings. Although no child was
conceived, this did not affect the result of the ritual to that point. Parsons and Cameron soon
married.

The rituals performed drew largely upon the Enochian magical system devised by Dr. John Dee
and Sir Edward Kelley. They also drew heavily from rituals and sex magick described by Aleister
Crowley, who in turn borrowed many aspects of his Babalon from combining the Babylonian
goddess Ishtar with the figure of Mystery Babylon, the "Great Whore" in the biblical Book of
Revelation.

A brief text entitled The Book of Babalon, or Liber 49, was written by Jack Parsons as a
transmission from the goddess or force called Babalon received by him during the Babalon
Working. Parsons said that Liber 49 constituted a fourth chapter of Liber AL Vel Legis (The Book
of the Law), the holy text of Thelema.

In the gematria of Hermetic Qabalah, Aleister Crowley equated the number 156 with Babalon
(equating the letter 'o' with the Hebrew letter Ayin which has the value 70). In Enochian,
"Babalon" means "wicked". "Babalond" means "a harlot".

- source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Babalon_Working

Here you can read Parson's own account of the "Babalon Working." Parson's name
within the OTO was "Anti-Christ."

- resource: http://www.sacred-texts.com/oto/lib49.htm

Following the Babalon working in the later 40's, the CoS and ToS have both formed as
imitations following Parson's degredation of Crowley's monicker, "To Mega Therion"
(the "great beast") to it's lowest form, representing the "goat of Mendes." Crowley
himself would have laughed at the association of the gematria of his magickal
monicker being associated with the 666 of Revelations now, some three and a half
generations later, but most D&D RPG playing "Wiccans" and "Pagans" (in name only)
as well as the followers of Tim LaHey's rabidly Christian "Left Behind" series both
consider "Crowley was a Satanist" to be the end-all be-all of the discussion about him.
Most OTO members, I regret to report, have never even read Crowley's autobiography,
"the Confessions."

No, sadly, most of the modern pactitioners of the OTO's occult agenda remain the
economically elite, the wealthy globalists, and the rabid, patriotic nationalists of
yesterday, who have, one generation later, expanded into the global imperialists of
today. Bohemian Grove is a fine example of an OTO "camp."

And they are on the "conservative" side. On the more "liberal" side are out-right
"neo-Sethian" believers in causing global destruction in an "end of the world" style
Apocalypse. And the plans to prepare for this contingency: global destruction, were
laid out prior to the 1940's, when construction began on the eariest examples of "deep
underground military installations" by NAZIs in Antarctica, in an area that is called
to this day, "New Swabia."

Even during the later life of Crowley himself, we find those who were then in the OTO
and practising the "magico-sexual" RoM&M were those who were plotting to take
over the world. The Illuminati agenda was declared dead when the OTO was formed
because the IO agenda was to conquer the world, and the OTO agenda has been to rule
the world, from behind closed doors, using "magical" paper money. Wthin the OTO
now, the neo-Sethian movement wants to blow us all up. But until the neo-Sethian
movement establishes it's own specific degree system, a heirarchy of rituals, etc. it is
only a "movement" and not an "Order" in itself.

So, who are the neo-Sethians? Well, look at the trend following Parsons, Cameron and
Hubbard. In 1955, Karl Germer, Crowley's second-in-command in the OTO, and one of
its original founders, expelled Kenneth Grant from the OTO. Crowley's opinon of
Grant was that he was "too dark" and too obsessed in his pursuit of what magicians of
the time called the "left hand path" (meaning, essentially, the "magico-sexual"
concepts). Grant was an ardent Theosophist, and Crowley wasn't. Crowley was a
practical magician and to this day Grant remains a mere secretary of rumours and
opinons with no basis in factual reality.

Grant's primary vein of research has been the 32 "Kalas." According to Grant, as well
as his disciple Michael Beartieux (author of the totally Theosophical, absolute
rubbish, stream of consciousness, "Voudoun Gnostic Workbook"), the Orishas of Vodoo
are based on petro, blood-letting rites. He borrows the pre-Hindu Vedic term "Kala"
(meaning phase or span of time) to describe what he identifies as 32 different types
of human blood and bodily fluids. Men, according to Grant's own "research" have 16
Kalas, and women have 16 Kalas. Grant advocates drinking menstrual blood from
women of various ages and stages of development, citing Crowley's use of the term
"Star-Fire" to describe the "Elixer Vitae" or pure water of everlasting life contained
within the Holy Grail.

Crowley's meaning for the term "Star-Fire" can be debated, but Grant's "dangerous
obsession" with the "magico-sexual" Dark-side, or "left-hand path," cannot be denied.
His protege, Austin Osman, who died the year after Grant was expelled from the OTO
by Germer, was an "automatic artist" and "stream of consciousness" author, who had
little or no skill or training in practical magick, and it seems as though Grant's
attempt to exhorcise the "Typhonian" trend of neo-Sethianism from the OTO in some
advanced form of reverse seance may have proved successful: the Typhonian OTO has
no rigid, or even defined, degree system or hierarchy of order, and so it remains an
independent tradition, alongside that of neo-Sethianism, among members within the
OTO. The "Typhonian OTO" has nothing to do with the neo-Sethian agenda of bringing
about the "Apocalypse" planned by the Bohemian Grove OTO camp members. It seems
the goal of the "Typhonian OTO" was more to simply clear Crowley's name from it's
"Satanic" associations by CoS and ToS members of the post-Crowley OTO. It is this trend
that constitues neo-Sethianism. Thus, if the "Typhonian OTO" formed a degree system,
it could become either a threat or an ally to the neo-Sethian movement, however for
now they remain two, unrelated and unequal, movements within, and among
members of, the OTO.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ordo_Templi_Orientis_(Typhonian)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenneth_Grant
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Austin_Spare

None of this is to say the academic writings of Kenneth Grant, using vague
"Orientalist" Theosophy and syncretism of QBLH with vooodoo to advocate literal
blood-drinking ceremonies, are not legitimate works, describing factual practises. It
is simply that he is describing it, while it is mainly the other members of the OTO
than those who follow Grant that are the ones who are, currently, actually practising
the ingestion of menstruum, the breeding of "moon-children" and the "magico-
sexual" RoM&M. Those are the rich elite at Bohemian Grove, who are third and fourth
generation members of the highest degrees of the OTO. The OTO is the religion of the
NWO.

In this sense, it is different from the "Illuminati" or the agenda of the original IO, or
Weishaupt's Bavarian "Perfectibilists," however one wishes to call them. The IO, even
if associated with the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, an inflammatory
defmmation of Hassidic QBLHism, which can be dated to no earlier than that time, the
primary goals of the Illuminati, as well as the first 22 of the 24 Protocols, had been
achieved by 1900, and thus this was when the last IO became the first OTO.

The change that was made from the former IO lodge to the latter OTO lodge was simple:
the IO of Weishaupt was designed to be "quasi-Masonic." It was designed around the
initiative of infiltrating and subsuming the lodges of Free Masonry using the
manner of infiltration developed under Hassan Ibn Sabba of the Crusades-era
Persian Assassin cult. Thus, the concept of Illuminism's "exoteric" or "outer" shell
fell between the later Rosicrucian-era dictates of "the Pope is the anti-Christ" made
by Familist-cults and the earlier, Jacobin-era dictates of "Fraterntiy or death" made
by the earliest Scottish Rite Lodges in France and America. Illuminism was a
revolutionary concept, that occured at specifically the right moment in history for it
to have occured. The notion of taking over the world was more acceptable to people,
at least, professors in Germany in the late 1700's, if it was dressed in the rosey-
coloured, Familist notions of a "no laws necessary" utopia to follow. The same ideas
expressed by Weishaupt as meant for the rich elite were much later championed by
Karl Marx as a viable strategy for a workers' Revolution. However, by the time Marx's
ideas could be implimented, such a revolution was staged by the early OTO, the
founding-members of the Yale camp of "Skull and Bones." The Rockefellers funded
Lenin's Bolshevik revolution, and fueled his Soviet imperialism during the US
depression and rise of NAZI Germany. However, by that time, the former "IO, now the
"OTO" or "Order of Death" or of "the death's head," under Crowley, controlled the
economic and political aspects of society in not just those three main countries, but
also the entire civilised world. This is when the OTO began, around 1900, with
Crowley's dictation of "Liber Legis." The IO ended, and the OTO began. The world is
conquered, time to manage it.

A small group of OTO members, who have consolidated the most economic power on
the earth, are of the pro-Apocalypse belief. I call them "neo-Sethians."
Illuminati History 101.I::
Thule:
a communique for the IOBB2.

The concept of the "Black Sun" can be dated at least as far back as to European
Alchemical traditions during the later Dark Ages. Representing the first of the seven
stages of the Alchemical process of transubstantion of lead into gold, the concept of
the "Black Sun" was ocassionally represented also by the symbol of the double-headed
eagle, such as in the Hapsburg crest, the 33rd degree motif of Free Masonry, etc.

Quote:
Sol niger (black sun) is also the name of the result of the first stage of the Opus Magnum in
alchemy, the blackening (nigredo). The complete Opus magnum (Great Work) ends with the
production of gold.

- source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Sun_(alchemy)#Sol_niger

For those interested in Pythagorean mathematikoi and akousmatikoi, Philolaus,

loayal follower of Pythagoras, born but one generation after the Master himself, was
apparently influenced to postulate his concept of a "Central Fire" as not only
heliocentrism, but also of a dual-loci of focal points, including a "dark star"
gravitational pivot point effecting earth's orbit to render it elliptical.

Quote:
It is possible that these teachings influenced Philolaus in the development of his groundbreaking
theory of the Central Fire. This is supported by the fact that the various teachings regarding
multiple suns are sometimes attributed to Empedocles, who was a contemporary of Philolaus, and
his senior. However, this connection may be coincidental, and it is likely that the attribution of
these ideas to Empedocles stems from an imperfect understanding of his cosmology in regard to
the reflective nature of the Sun.

- source:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Sun_(alchemy)#The_two_suns_in_the_hermetic
_tradition

Quote:
The term Black Sun (Ger. "Schwarze Sonne"), also referred to as the Sonnenrad (the German for
"Sun Wheel"), is a symbol of esoteric or occult significance, notable for its usage in Nazi
mysticism. Today, it may also be used in occult currents of Germanic neopaganism, and in
Irminenschaft or Armanenschaft-inspired esotericism.

- source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Sun_(occult_symbol)

The term "Black Sun" began during the Beer Hall meetings of German Worker
Democratic Social Groups, such as NASDAP, the party that would go on to bring about
the Third Reich. It was originally meant as an "occult" term, and not refered to
publically by that name. Instead, publically, it was depicted by the symbol of Adolph
Hitler's "Swastika" motif.

Quote:
Although it is believed the inverted (or "unlucky") crooked-spiral cross motif was authentically
a design of Adolph Hitler, it is known that the reverse of this appeared first on Tibetan Buddhist
monastery wall-paintings several hundred years before first appearing in Celtic Ireland. Both
places the triskele, or triple-cross / spiral, and the swastika, or quadruple-cross / spiral are
both considered symbols of the Milky Way galaxy as seen from above or below one of its poles.
This symbol is also equivalent to the double- cross / spiral of Yin Yang and Hunab Khu. Similar
symbols are the spiral and maze patterns that date back to the places of earliest habitations in
Australia, Asia, Europe, and North America, so it should be considered an innate symbol in the
original alphabet used in Antarctica. Its correct pronunciation, however, has obviously since been
lost. Instead now it is called "Thule."

- source: http://www.benpadiah.com/otherstuff/agnawrunes/Runes.html

The Name of the Black Sun is "Thule," and the depiction of Thule is the Swastika. Each
symbol depicts a symmetrical repetition of one of a series of Runes, the "Armanic"
rune-lore designed by Guido Von List. Thus, the "swastika" of the NAZIs was a pair of
mirrored runes for the letter "S." Here is a depiction of another in this same series of
symbols, representing a higher order in the same sequence as the Swastika. Here we
see the double "S" of the Swastika replaced by a double "T." Thus, we see 16 rays
surrounding the central runes. Remember that all these symbols represent the
"Black Sun," and the name of the Black Sun was "Thule."

Although all the Irminenschraft (or simply, Irminists) believed the Vimana of the
Rig Veda described ancient air-ships, and that the Vedic Aryans had migrated into
Europe to found the Norse mythic culture, not all of them knew what such lofty
concepts might really mean. The NAZI occultist Karl Maria Wiligut crafted what
would come to be the religious beliefs of the NAZI Third Reich based on the concept
that "Krishna" was a Vedic deity, and that the Norse descended from the Vedics.

Quote:
Wiligut claimed that the Bible had originally been written in Germanic, and testified to an
"Irminic" religion (Irminenreligion) that contrasted with Wotanism. He claimed to worship a
Germanic god "Krist", which Christianity was supposed to have later bootlegged as their own
saviour Christ.

- source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irminism

While this notion of a "new" or "revived" form of "Pagan Chrisianity" was being
considered among the inner-most circles of the occultist "intelligentsia" of 1920's
Germany, the foundations for such wild speculations had already been laid by
earlier, legitimate scientists, in search of more planets within our own solar system
than were then known. Long before Pluto had been discovered, the search for the
furthest planet of our solar system was begun by the same man who believed he'd
seen "canals on Mars," apocryphally ridiculed by history for having seen merely
imperfections in the grain of his own spectcles.

Quote:
In 1894, with the help of William Pickering, Percival Lowell, a wealthy Bostonian aristocrat,
founded the Lowell Observatory in Flagstaff, Arizona. In 1906, convinced he could resolve the
conundrum of Uranus's orbit, he began an extensive project to search for a trans-Neptunian
planet, which he named Planet X. The X in the name represents an unknown and is pronounced as
the letter, as opposed to the Roman numeral for 10 (Planet X would, at the time, have been the
ninth planet). Lowell's hope in tracking down Planet X was to establish his scientific credibility,
which had eluded him thanks to his widely derided belief that channel-like features visible on
the surface of Mars were canals constructed by an intelligent civilisation.

- source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planet_x#Planet_X

In short, the likelihood of there being a real "Planet X," that is specifically the "size
of earth," and thus theoretically capable of sustaining life, in an elongated elliptical
orbit around our sun is not only a NAZI neo-myth, but it is also a currently accepted
scientific theoryamong the esteemed community of astro-physicists.

Quote:
The Kuiper belt terminates suddenly at a distance of 48 astronomical units (AU) from the Sun (by
comparison, Neptune lies 30 AU from the Sun),[51] and there is some speculation that this sudden
drop-off, known as the "Kuiper cliff", may be attributed to the presence of an object with a mass
between that of Mars and Earth located beyond 48 AU. Astronomers have not excluded the
possibility of a more massive Earth-like planetoid located further than 100 AU with an eccentric
and inclined orbit. Computer simulations have suggested that a body roughly the size of Earth,
ejected outward by Neptune early in the Solar System's formation and currently in an elongated
orbit between 80 and 170 AU from the Sun, could explain not only the Kuiper cliff but also the
peculiar "detached" TNOs such as Sedna.

- source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planet_x#Kuiper_cliff

The idea of an alien inhabited "Planet X" that had passed near our own earth and
tampered with our evolution was already a well enough established theory by the
time of the earliest Irminen Thulist proto-NAZIs. By this point, the NAZI ocultists
were not only looking outward, beyond the known planets, but also inward, toward
Philolaus' "Central Fire." While many were already then beginning to ponder from
which direction this "Planet X" could approach earth from next, others were already
attempting to conceive of the more distant focal loci point that marked the
elliptically elongated orbit of Planet X.

Compare these concepts of Karl Wiligut to the modern theory of a Black Sun...

Quote:
Santur is interpreted as a burnt-out Sun that was still visible at the time of Homer. Rüdiger
speculates that this was the center of the solar system hundreds of millennia ago, and he imagines
a fight between the new and the old Suns that was decided 330,000 years ago. Santur is seen as the
source of power of the Hyperboreans.

- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irminism
Quote:
Nemesis is a hypothetical red dwarf star or brown dwarf, orbiting the Sun at a distance of about
50,000 to 100,000 AU, somewhat beyond the Oort cloud. This star was originally postulated to
exist as part of a hypothesis to explain a perceived cycle of mass extinctions in the geological
record.

- source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nemesis_(star)

Now recall the fractured poetry of SS officer Rudolf Mund, NAZI occultist...

Quote:
Rudolf J. Mund (a former SS member and later also member of the Vienna Circle) described a
relationship of the visible sun as a symbol of an invisible anti-sun, the Black Sun.

"Everything that can be comprehended by human senses as material, is the shadow of the invisible
spiritual light. The material fire is - seen in this way - also only the shadow of the spiritual
fire."

- source:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Sun_(occult_symbol)#The_Vienna_Circle

and, again, this quote validating the concept in scientific terminology...

Quote:
Another hypothesis argues that long period comets, rather than arriving from random points
across the sky as is commonly thought, are in fact clustered in a band inclined to the ecliptic.
Such clustering could be explained if they were disturbed by an unseen object at least as large as
Jupiter; possibly a brown dwarf. The hypothetical planet—or companion of the Sun—would be
located in the outer part of the Oort cloud.

- source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planet_x#Source_of_long_period_comets

Thus the double "S" of the Swatika can be seen to symbolise the dual-solar nature, one
light, one dark, alike twinned stars. However the double Runic "T" of the "alternative
design" of the Black Sun symbol merely indicates, as I have said, that it is a note in
the same scale, however of a different order, rank and file than the Swastika symbol.
Both represent the same concept: the Black Sun. However, the base-4 Swastika and
the base-16 rays of the "alternative design" simply represent two different
definitions for what "Black Sun" each means. The double "S" Swastika has been
described as representing the dual nature of the sun, as if the "main sequence" of
star growth were the same sequence as the "transmutation" of alchemical metals.
Likewise, the dual "T," base-16 "Black Sun" symbol also represents a dualistic aspect to
the sun our star. However in this case it relates to the black hole at galactic core.

Quote:
The symbol of the Black Sun also has an alternative design, possibly a phantasy product of
postwar writers, allegedly known as the "Die innere Welt - das Geheimnis der schwarzen Sonne"
(The inner word - the secret of the Black Sun). This Black Sun symbolism formed a central
doctrine to the pre-Nazi secret societies, namely the Black Sun, the Thule Society (Thule-
Gesellschaft) and von Liebenfels' Order of the New Templars (Ordo Novi Templi). The
transliteration of the text around the signet, seen here beginning from its upper left corner and
proceeding around clockwise, is as of today untranslated.
Here is a transliteration of the text around the signet, beginning from its upper left
corner and proceeding around clockwise.

Here are as many as 24 distinct letters and how often they occur in the text.
Illuminati History 101.J::
Majestic 12 and the Federal Reserve:
a communique for the IOBB2.

Next, let us turn our focus for attention away from the "occultism" of 20th century
sects of speculative philosophers toward modern economic and political planning
bodies, yet continue in this to apply the same method for studying both: to analyse
their degree systems. So we shall see how the earlier idealogies of these occult sects
has infused and inspired the politics and economics of the 20th century.

The rapid assumption of political and economic rank by crypto-IO / neo-OTO

operatives and occult initiates was due to the first world war. As more people became
aware of the propagation of European cults in England and America - the GD being
the most public, but no less so was the Theosophical Society than was Weishaupt's
original IO in the form of Skull and Bones - there became an increased presumption
of a trans-Atlantic "cult-gap," which Crowley, an Englishman, traveled to America to
counter-balance (presenting the OTO works of Reuss to the Northern jurisdiction of
the Scottish Rite in 1919). This was the era when the initiate as shamen idea was
usurped and suppressed by the idea of the initiate as a spy.

To begin our analysis, let us take up the storyline in 1917, the year of the Bolshevik
Revolution of October 25 (Julian) or November 7 (Gregorian). By this time, many of
the European, middle-eastern and Asian nations were in ruins from WWI. The Treaty
of Versailes began being negotiated (1919) long before the end of combat operations
was officially declared (1922). It was already being drafted by political planning
committees staffed by the wealthiest bankers in 1917. This planning body was called,
at the time, "The Inquiry."

Quote:
The Inquiry was a study group established in 1917 by Woodrow Wilson to prepare materials for
the peace negotiations following World War I. The group, composed of around 150 academics, was
directed by presidential adviser Edward House and supervised directly by philosopher Sidney
Mezes. The group worked from the premises of the American Geographical Society of New York.

Mezes's senior colleagues were geographer Isaiah Bowman, journalist Walter Lippmann, historian
James Shotwell, and lawyer David Hunter Miller. Others included James Truslow Adams.

Members of the inquiry, now named American Commission to Negotiate Peace, traveled to the Paris
Peace Conference in 1919, accompanying Wilson aboard the USS George Washington to France.

The members would later form the Council on Foreign Relations.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Inquiry

Now, before we can begin to discuss the CFR, we must briefly also view the
transitionary era during the drafting of the Treaty of Versailles, which also created
the League of Nations (precursor to the modern UN), on June 28, 1919. Thus, even if
the "Inquiry" group's intentions were benign diplomacy, it appears that by the time
their boat reached French shores, they were hell-bent on ruling the world. We see
the original membership of the "Inquiry" group (academics, philosophers,
philanthropists, geographers, journalists, historians, lawyers, etc.) was quickly
replaced by far more pro-war / hawkish interests once they arrived to represent the
US and President Woodrow Wilson's "14 point plan."

Quote:
The American Commission to Negotiate Peace, successor to the Inquiry, participated in the peace
negotiations at the Treaty of Versailles, January 18 — December 9, 1919. Frank Lyon Polk headed
the commission in 1919. The peace conference was superseded by the Council of Ambassadors,
1920–1931, which was organized to deal with various political questions regarding the
implementation of provisions of the Treaty of Versailles at the end of World War I. Members of the
commission appointed by President Woodrow Wilson included:

Clive Day, an American college professor and writer on economics history at the University of
California.

Donald Paige Frary, an American college professor with Yale University, an expert on
International Affairs, and author; served as a secretary to Edward M. House.

Edward M. House, a diplomat, politician and presidential foreign policy advisor to President
Wilson.

Vance C. McCormick, an American politician and prominent businessman from Harrisburg,

Pennsylvania.

Sidney Edward Mezes, an American philosopher and college professor, former president of the
City College of New York.

Charles Seymour, an American college professor at Yale University.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Commission_to_Negotiate_Peace

As we see now, the pro-war / hawkish globalists' perspective superceded the

originally more diplomatic mission as it was intended by President Wilson. By this
point, Wilson himself had become disenchanted with the political processes at the
negotiations over the Treaty of Versailles, and left the conference in February, 1919,
to return to the US, placing Colonel House in his seat on the round-table "Council of
Ten." Although they had been long-time friends, House betrayed Wilson's soft-
hearted stance on reperations from Germany and imposed, instead, the heavy-handed
sanctions on them that bankrupted the German economy and led to the rise of the
Third Reich and the fommenting of a second world war. The resultant Treaty was so
odious to Wilson's own original vision that the final wording was never passed into
ratification by the US Senate. The US never officially joined the League of Nations
that US President Woodrow Wilson had idealised in his "14 points." Instead, the
plotting of globalist politicial interests took the economical route to achieving its
ends in the USA. Here we shall see the first meeting of the CFR was held during the
negotiations on the Treaty of Versailles.

Quote:
The earliest origin of the Council stemmed from a working fellowship of about 150 scholars,
called "The Inquiry", tasked to brief President Woodrow Wilson about options for the postwar
world when Germany was defeated. Through 1917–1918, this academic band, including Wilson's
closest adviser and long-time friend "Colonel" Edward M. House, as well as Walter Lippmann,
gathered at 155th Street and Broadway at the Harold Pratt House in New York City, to assemble the
strategy for the postwar world. The team produced more than 2,000 documents detailing and
analyzing the political, economic, and social facts globally that would be helpful for Wilson in the
peace talks. Their reports formed the basis for the Fourteen Points, which outlined Wilson's
strategy for peace after war's end.

These scholars then traveled to the Paris Peace Conference, 1919 that would end the war; it was at
one of the meetings of a small group of British and American diplomats and scholars, on May 30,
1919, at the Hotel Majestic, that both the Council and its British counterpart, the Chatham House
in London, were born.

Some of the participants at that meeting, apart from Edward House, were Paul Warburg, Herbert
Hoover, Harold Temperley, Lionel Curtis, Lord Eustace Percy, Christian Herter, and American
academic historians James Thomson Shotwell of Columbia University, Archibald Cary Coolidge of
Harvard, and Charles Seymour of Yale.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Council_on_foreign_relations#Early_history

All of the original members of this group were wealthy banking magnates and
industrial sector monopolists. They may have seen their aims as "humanitarian" at
the time, but their goal was no less than to reshape all existing society as they,
themselves, saw fit. Thus, we come back full circle to the morals and dogma of the
crypto-IO / neo-OTO under Aleister Crowley. Crowley's restructuring of the OTO's 90°
RoM&M system into accordance with the 10°'s of the Golden Dawn system came at the
cost of Crowley implanting throughout all his literature for the OTO his own unique
concepts, such as the "Law of Thelema" ("Do What Thou Wilt"). As we have studied the
"Typhonian" OTO of Kenneth Grant and Austin Spare, as well as the CoS of LaVey and
the ToS of Acquino, we can quickly see Crowley's impact on the "Left Hand Path"
devotees of the RoM&M, the practitioners of "sex-magick." Likewise, Crowley's own
inner-most ring of disciples included JPL / NASA rocket-scientist Jack Parsons and
pre-Dianetics / Scientology L. Ron Hubbard. So, what did the CFR's first meeting of 12
at the Majestic Hotel in Paris during the signing of the Treaty of Versailles beget in
its wake by around the time of the Parsons / Hubbard "Babalon Working" (March 2,
1946)?

Quote:
The original composition was six civilians (mostly scientists), and six high-ranking military
officers, two from each major military service. Three (Souers, Vandenberg, and Hillenkoetter) had
been the first three heads of central intelligence. The Moore/Shandera documents did not make
clear who was the director of MJ-12, or if there was any organizational hierarchy.

The named members of MJ-12 were:

Rear Adm. Roscoe H. Hillenkoetter: first CIA director

Dr. Vannevar Bush: chaired wartime Office of Scientific Research and Development and
predecessor National Defense Research Committee; set up and chaired postwar Joint Research and
Development Board (JRDB) and then the Research and Development Board (RDB); chaired NACA;
President of Carnegie Institute, Washington D.C.

James Forrestal: Secretary of the Navy; first Secretary of Defense (replaced after his death on MJ-
12 by Gen. Walter Bedell Smith, 2nd CIA director)

Gen. Nathan Twining: headed Air Materiel Command at Wright-Patterson AFB; Air Force Chief of
Staff (1953–1957); Chairman of Joint Chiefs of Staff (1957–1961)

Gen. Hoyt Vandenberg: Directed Central Intelligence Group (1946–1947); Air Force Chief of Staff
(1948–1953)

Gen. Robert M. Montague: Guided missile expert; 1947 commander of Fort

Bliss; headed nuclear Armed Forces Special Weapons Center, Sandia Base

Dr. Jerome Hunsaker: Aeronautical engineer, MIT; chaired NACA after Bush

Rear Adm. Sidney Souers: first director of Central Intelligence Group, first executive secretary of
National Security Council (NSC)

Gordon Gray: Secretary of the Army; intelligence and national security expert; CIA psychological
strategy board (1951–1953); Chairman of NSC 5412 Committee (1954–1958); National Security
Advisor (1958–1961)

Dr. Donald Menzel: Astronomer, Harvard; cryptologist during war; security consultant to CIA and
NSA

Dr. Detlev Bronk: Medical physicist; aviation physiologist; chair, National Academy of Sciences,
National Research Council; president Johns Hopkins & Rockefeller University

Dr. Lloyd Berkner: Physicist; radio expert; executive secretary of Bush's JRDB

According to other sources and MJ-12 papers to emerge later, famous scientists like Robert
Oppenheimer, Albert Einstein, Karl Compton, Edward Teller, John von Neumann, and Wernher von
Braun were also allegedly involved with MJ-12. (see also Arguments for below, particularly
statements by Dr. Robert Sarbacher)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Majestic_12#Membership

By the end of the second world war, it was already considered no longer feasible to
apply a diplomatic approach toward global government. The military "doomsday"
backup-plan was put into effect. This was when Dwight D. "Ike" Esienhower warned
of the threat of the growing "military-industrial complex." This is when "black-ops"
and "black-budget" spending on them became vogue. Naturally we do not have these
shadow agencies under cover of umbrella corporations, protected from the "all
seeing eye" under the "wings of the eagle," so to speak, anymore. Now, we have the
DHS "fiasco" attempting to fix an intelligence community that was already functional,
only being paid to look the other way on 9-11. This has effectively allowed many of
the "black-ops" to become "rainbow-ops" or those performed in or on the public. So,
what then, was and is this "military-industrial" complex Ike warned us of? What is
the interim like between the implimentation of the "military-industrial" complex and
the DHS shake-down of all "good cops" following 9-11-2001? During the last century,
from 1910 until 2010, the Federal Reserve Central Bank of the USA has held complete
economic authority over the "military-industrial" complex's "black-budgets" for
their "black-op" wars and "black-bag" torture at "black-sites." The Federal Reserve
Bank is the "front" business covering the money held by the CFR (public-relations)
portion of the Trilateral Commission (the "military-industrial" complex itself). The
Bilderberg Group under the Federal Reserve, the Fed under the CFR, the CFR under
the Trilateral Commision, and the Trilateral Commission under the Royal Institute of
International Affairs (RIIA), and so on and so forth. The whole political "chess-
game" as envisioned by Zbiegnew Brzenski is purchased with credit on loan and paid
for by the "Federal Reserve," a privately owned bank with a no-bid sole-rights deal
with the Constitutional US Republic. Here is the degree system used within the cult of
the Federal Rserve:

Quote:
The Federal Reserve describes its structure as composed of five parts:

· The presidentially appointed Board of Governors (or Federal Reserve Board), an independent
federal government agency located in Washington, D.C.

· The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC), composed of the seven members of the Federal
Reserve Board and five of the twelve Federal Reserve Bank presidents, which oversees open market
operations, the principal tool of U.S. monetary policy.

· Twelve regional privately-owned Federal Reserve Banks located in major cities throughout the
nation, which divide the nation into twelve Federal Reserve districts. The Federal Reserve Banks
act as fiscal agents for the U.S. Treasury, and each has its own nine-member board of directors.

· Numerous other private U.S. member banks, which own required amounts of non-transferable
stock in their regional Federal Reserve Banks.

· Various advisory councils.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_reserve_bank

So we can now see how the modern Federal Reserve Bank, which controls the flow of
paper money from the minting press, is alike a latter-day, crypto-Crowleyian version
of the GD / OTO's degree system, without philosophical justification, nor any seeming
need for such from philosophers. The degree systems used by occult sects are
undeniably obvious, and though that of the Fed is the same in general structure to
these, the Fed remains a secret shrouded in a riddle wrapt up within an enigma. Even
today, dilligent efforts by congressmen like Ron Paul attempting to make public the
full accounting books of the Fed are relentlessly blocked and slaughtered by a
predominantly Zionist congress. And who, when we look at the bottom-line, was
behind the creation of the Fed, the CFR, the Treaty of Versailles and the League of
Nations (precursor to the UN)? Here is a list of their names:
Quote:
A particularly severe panic in 1907 provided the motivation for renewed demands for banking
and currency reform. The following year Congress enacted the Aldrich-Vreeland Act which
provided for an emergency currency and established the National Monetary Commission to study
banking and currency reform.

The chief of the bipartisan National Monetary Commission was financial expert and Senate
Republican leader Nelson Aldrich. Aldrich set up two commissions — one to study the American
monetary system in depth and the other, headed by Aldrich himself, to study the European
central-banking systems and report on them. Aldrich went to Europe opposed to centralized
banking, but after viewing Germany's banking system, he came away believing that a centralized
bank was better than the government-issued bond system that he had previously supported.
Centralized banking was met with much opposition from politicians, who were suspicious of a
central bank and who charged that Aldrich was biased due to his close ties to wealthy bankers
such as J.P. Morgan and his daughter's marriage to John D. Rockefeller, Jr. In 1910, Aldrich and
executives representing the banks of J.P. Morgan, Rockefeller, and Kuhn, Loeb & Co., secluded
themselves for 10 days at Jekyll Island, Georgia. The executives included Frank A. Vanderlip,
president of the National City Bank of New York, associated with the Rockefellers; Henry Davison,
senior partner of J.P. Morgan Company; Charles D. Norton, president of the First National Bank of
New York; and Col. Edward House, who would later become President Woodrow Wilson's closest
adviser and founder of the Council on Foreign Relations. There, Paul Warburg of Kuhn, Loeb, & Co.
directed the proceedings and wrote the primary features of what would be called the Aldrich
Plan. Warburg would later write that "The matter of a uniform discount rate (interest rate) was
discussed and settled at Jekyll Island."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Federal_Reserve_System#The_National
_Monetary_Commission

Nelson Aldrich was their primary political champion at the time of the passage, on
December 23, 1913, as ch. 6, 38 Stat. 251 of 12 U.S.C. ch.3, the "Federal Reserve Act." The
final wording of the Act itself was taken from the "Aldrich Plan," proposing a
National Reserve Association with 15 regional district branches and 46
geographically dispersed directors. This differed from the final wording in the
numbers of those who served at each level, but this three-tiered plan remained in
place throughout the legislative history of the Fed Act, ever since its inception at the
meeting on Jekyll Island between Aldrich and the wealthy industrialists and bankers
of his time. These wealthy industrialists and bankers were all WWI profiteers, who
had no-bid government contracts supplying the military with weapons, vehicles,
gas, etc. As such, they continued meeting, such as the May 19, 1919 meeting to create
the CFR held at the Majestic Hotel, and continued founding further "round-table"
think-tanks, called by then "Trusts" - such as those of the Carnegie Ford scholarship
foundation or the International Endowment for the Arts.

These planning-bodies, so-called "round-table" type think-tanks, are the modern

inheritors of competition between elder sectarians and occultists over various degree
systems. The modern Federal Reserve Chairman, Ben Bernanke, does not, it is safe to
assume, know anything about "magick" ala Crowley, nor "majic" ala UFOs. All he
knows about is economics, and how to speak the language used by those who have the
most money. However, whether he knows it or not, Ben Bernanke is standing on the
shoulders of Aleister Crowley as much as Nelson Aldrich. Of course, Crowley alone
cannot be credited with the invention of the degree-system's use itself. However
without Crowley, there could have been no Fed, just as without Weishaupt no Crowley,
and likewise, without Dee, no Weishaupt.
Illuminati History 101.H::
the Order of the Peacock Angel:
a communique for the IOBB2.

Quote:
It was a scene that would have delighted the heart of any Sunday newspaper reporter, and would
have aroused the envy of a master stage designer. Somewhere in Putney, most respectable of
London suburbs, sixty men and women were gyrating ecstatically in an underground temple
before an eight-foot, glossy black statue of a peacock. As I stood in a small gallery built above the
floor level, I took note of the pool of water in which the bird's feet rested; the monotonous
arabesques of the wall-decoration, the criss-cross patterns of the stone floor.

Rising and falling in an incessant, all-intrusive beat, hidden drums were thudding out a tempo
which made it almost impossible to keep oneself still. Each of the worshippers was robed in a
white flowing garment which completely covered his ordinary clothes. On the breat of each was
embroidered a peacock - some green, some black, others red.

The devotees of the peacock angel meet once a fortnight, carry out their complicated rituals, whirl
before the effigy of their deity - and return to their respective homes. You would not be able to
identify them if you met them outside; no slit-eyed oriental or turbaned shiek leads the revels.
No 'obscene rites' are practised. The devil-worship attributed to the Yezidis of Kurdistan who are
also peacock followers is not to be found here. Then why should an otherwise apparently sober
and sometimes very ordinary man in the street become a member of a cult like this? What does he
get out of it? How is he recruited?

The snake and the cock (or peacock) are symbols of power. As such they are worshipped and
propitiated by the Yezidis, and have given many a headache of identification to those experts on
the Gnostic mysteries who have found them engraved upon seals of uncertain origin in the Middle
East. The Enlgish version of the cult was brought to Britain by a Syrian who settled in London in
1913. He converted, so runs the tradition of the Cult, five people of importance: a banker, a
member of the Peerage and three ladies who were well known at that time as society hostesses. His
name is known only to initiates, who introduce it in a disguised form into their conversation.

The cult grew in numbers until sixteen halkas (lodges) were formed, each with a minimum of
seven members. Essentially the belief is that there are two powers which can be of help to people
in everyday life: the powers of increase and of construction. These are known by the coded name
of the peacock and the snake, because their names must not be pronounced except by initiates.
The reason for adopting these pseudonyms is that the total of the numbers in the names (worked
out by numerology) is equivalent to the names of the words 'peacock' and 'snake.'
It was this discovery, based upon the numerology of the Arab cabbala, which led to the London
peacock men and women. I had let it be known that I had heard of their existence (which I had)
and that I had something of interest to impart to them (which I had not) through a member who had
been introduced to me, and who had mentioned the Yezidis in a general conversation on the Middle
East. That he was a priest of the cult became evident when I mentioned the Sacred Number. The
peacock cultist (British Branch) did not at that time know that anyone who was reasonably
proficient in the abjad (cabbal) system of the Arabs would be able to decipher their Holy Name.

The aims of the cult are strictly fraternal. The main objectives are the sharin of the ecstatic
experience which follows the operation of the rituals, and mutual help thereafter. These ideas are
by no means confined to the peacock people, for they underlie the theories and practices of quite
a number of secret societies. What was interesting was to find the cult in London, to make contact,
and to be able to witness the ceremonies.

Like Sufism (with which it probably has connections in the remote past), the peacock religion
embraces the belief that the sharing of the rituals will make the worshippers in some way akin to
one another and also conduce towards the realization of their ambitions. At a certain point in his
development, the worshipper becomes 'enlightened' as to what his true vocation is - and finds the
means to satisfy it. Thus the organization not only offers what might be called piece of mind in
spiritual activity; it purports to bring material success in the mundane world as well.

Although they are not by any means missionaries, the cultists do try to attract members. This is
in accordance with the belief that progress in the things of the world can be achieved by co-
operation as well as by magic. Further, it is believed that the magical practices are more likely to
succeed if there is a community within which they can be given expression. It was put to me thus:
"If three members of the Cult get together and decide that theya re to progress in the world, they
may find that they have a 'call' to open, say, a shop. If they have the confidence that this is likely
to succeed, and if they give the peacock-power the environment (the shop) in which to work - it
cannot fail!"

If nothing goes on to which anyone might take exception, why is the cult so shy, why is its very
existence kept secret? In the first place, much uninformed literature on the subject says that the
worshippers of the peacock are devil-worshippers. The origin of their belief is the Moslem
intolerance under the Turks which labelled these schismatics infidels. They are not allowed to
use the name of Satan - and it is blacked out in their books. This is because they are allowed only
to think of good, and must not retain the idea of evil in their minds.

Secondly, the High Priest told me, the organization is pledged to maintain its secrecy because
"there has been no society and no country in whichc ecstatics have not been subjected to
persecution. We must be allowed to operate for ourselves, and with ourselves. We are not
interested in casual onlookers and Press sensationalism."

The nature of the ecstatic experience which is attatined by the members is of course the kernel of
the whole thing. But let us start from the beginning. Members are expected to be on the watch for
possible recruits. The theory is that there is, deep down inside almost eveyone, a feeling that he
is unfulfilled. This fulfillment is sought in the career, in promotion, in money, in marriage or
hobbies. But there remain a large number of individuals who do not attain it. These are the
prospective members of any cult, and especially of the peacock people.

In conversation, the member is to find out the mental attitude of the prospective recruit. What are
his hopes and fears, what are his weaknesses and strengths . . . what his goal in life. Reports on
these people are submitted to the High Priest. Providing that the potential members is not deeply
in debt, or thought to have any unusual or perverted interersts, and one he has developed an
interest in fulfilling himself, he can be put on the list of candidates for missionary development.
People who already have a metaphysical commitment, or leanings towards spiritualism or
organized religion in any form, are barred.

The candidate is asked whether he would like to take part in group discussions or demonstrations
of contemplation and concentration, based on an Easten model. If he agrees, he begins to attend
meetings at which he is 'developed.' This development takes the form of goin through excercises
which give him the power to direct his mind at will upon certain thoughts and exclude others. If
he is interested in hypnotism, he may be taught this, with the reservation that the group's
attitude towards hypnosis is that it is of limited value, except in the early stages of the spiritual
development. He brings his problems to the leader of the Circle. These difficulties are met in
discussion in training how to overcome worry and confusion - again by concentration and
meditation. The entire programme of mind-training is leadin the candidate towards the mystical
experience, although he may not yet be aware that this is so - or even that such a thing exists.

If he finds (as he generally does) that he is deriving benefit from this form of psychotherapy, he
is told that he can progress further, but that in order to do so he must place himself completely in
the hands of the master of the Circle - the High Priest. At this point some candidates fall out of
the running, partly no doubt because quite a number of people object to being told exactly what to
do. The remainder, however, carry on.

The next part of the training is to carry out specific excercises - both mental and physical - in a
graduated course, until he can fill his mind with the various emotions at will: joy, fear, optimism,
a sensation of power. He is given words to repeat before going to sleep. Any dreams are to be
carefully noted; for these are looked upon as omens, and are interpreted in accordance with fixed
rules by the Master or Guide (his assistant).

There is no carefully worked out theology in the movement. The peacock represents the power
which is 'in charge' of human affairs; and anyone who wants to enter this fold must believe that
there is such a power. I talked to several members who said that they had been recruited at a stage
before this, however. They were curious to know how various of their friends were able to battle
with life without flinching, were able to achieve what others could not, and so on. They asked: and
were brought straight into the 'instructional' phase, at which there is no preaching, only practise
of excercises. When the excercises seemed to work, they were told that it was through the power
which was called the Peacock Angel. There are probably several hundred members throuhgout
Britain, and I was told of three lodges in the United States. Some of the members have live
peacocks, which they keep as symbols for the 'Path' upon which they have embarked.

After the ceremony just mentioned, worshippers and guests were ushered into a large, well-
furnished room, where refershments - no alcohol - were laid out on buffet tables. They had
removed their outer robes, and stood revealed as ordinary men and women, much like the type
whom one might meet at a better kind of cocktail party in the West One district of London. The
sign of identification, I am pretty sure, is thus: the right hand is placed, with the fingers spread
out (perhaps to represent the tail of the peacock) on the left breast, just above the heart. The
counter-sign may have been stroking the chin with the left hand. The latter signal is one which
has been in use for many centuries among mystical fraternities of the Middle East, from which the
London peacock people have undoubtedly derived their rituals and probably their beleifs as well.
In the Middle East, the chin is stroked with the right hand.

Out of the sixty members whom I saw at this meeting, none looked like a foreigner, noen fo the
working class, nobody seemed on superficial inspection to be the wild-eyed crank type.

Prayers are said, in private, to a small (probably silver) image of a peacock. These, or such of
them as were shown to me, did not seem to ask for much else than enlightenment, material
progress and mystical experience. When it is desired to attain an objective of a more specific sort,
special rituals are used, of a magical type.

I asked the High Priest about black magic and evil-wishing. "Black magic is an appeal to the power
of evil. We belieev that evil is not a power in its owne right, but an unhealthy force which can be
built up in a man's (or woman's) mind. Therefore we do not admit its existence and give it reality
and focus. Therefore, the devil does nto exist for us. Those who revere evil are as bad as those who
fear or hate it. We ignore it completely. The same answer gives you the explanation why we cannot
indulge in evil spells and the like. They must not exist, because we do not allow to exist in us.
Since we are aimin at removing the evil from people's minds, we cannot allow thoughts of it to
enter. The thoughts which we have are all constructive."

How was the Order of the Black Peacock financed? There was certainly a good deal of evidence that
money was being spent upon it. . . .

"You will see," said the priest, "one way in which money comes to the Shrine, and you can draw
your own conclusions from it. But I may tell you that this organization is not run for profit. When
members make money as a result of any activity for whose success they have prayed to the
Peacock, they pay two and a half per cent. of that to the Shrine. This money they keep in their own
possession, and they lay it out for objectives which are devided by the Council." Who were the
Council? "The Council changes every year, on the occasion of our Spring Festival: the first
Wednesday in April. There are two representatives for every twenty members. Elections are
among all the members."

I supposed that the priests had an automatic seat on the Council.

"Not at all. In this year's Council, for instance, there is no priestly member."

Did the Order hold much property? No, it seemed, none. Who, then, financed a meeting such as
this one? "In rotation of surname-initials, the members who have accumulated profits from the
intervention of the Peacock in their business and professional affairs."

I had been interested for many years in ecstatic religion, and was determined, if I could, to be
allowed to see the exact method by which the members worked themselves up into a frenzy, and
what happened then. "It shall be as you desire," said the priest. "You are in any case invited to
the Urs." This word is the standard one for the festival of a patron saint, in Arabic and Persian.

Ten days later I was picked up at Clapham Common Underground station, after a telephone
message. It seemed that there was still some doubt as to whether I was workin for a newspaper, or
might in some way let out what little I had learned. In any case, the number-plates on the car
which met me were well covered with mud, and the homely but self-posessed woman sitting the
back kept me talking all the time we were travellin to the scene of the meeting. "Do you swear on
every holy book, upon your honour, upon the life and death of yourself and those dearest to you,
without reservation, that you will not give others the oppurtunity of contacting us; that you will
treat our Cult with respect; that you will help, not hinder, us and anything conntected with us,
while you are convinced that we are worthy fo this trust and this consideration?" "I do."

In the growing dusk, the house to which we were driven seemed an ordinary small suburban one.
Inside it was neat and clean, and showed that it was a place of no great size. My friend the High
Priest was there, in the front room, sitting with about ten more or less serious-faced people, some
of whom I recognized from the original meeting. There were new faces, too. A tiny oil lamp burned
in a niche by the door. Newcomers passed their hands over it to purify themselves, as the Kurds
do.
We were given green tea, small cakes with icing upon them. The talk was general, and seemed to be
commercial rather than anything else. Any group of people, I tohught - perhaps uncharitably -
who met regularly and helped each other in business affairs, and who believed as firmly that
there was a special sueprnatural blessing upon their activities, would achieve prosperity, in the
long run. . . .

There were sounds of music from the next room, but much less insistent than before. One by one,
the members rose and excused themselves. I sat and talked with a barrister and an accountant
about my days with the dervishes in Asia and Africa, and found that they were most interested.
They seemed to feel that there was a point of contact. Presently - about half an hour after we had
started tea - the priest took me by the arm. "The time has come for me to go in."

A short passage led to the other reception-room of the house. As we reached the door, he removed
his shoes, and I did the same. Inside, sitting on small hassocks and swaying in time to the music,
were the other members of the cult. In one corner stood a smaller peacock statue, standing on a
bronze vessel of water. The water was distinctly bubbling. . . .

In one corner sat the musician, playing a guitar, from which a haunting melody seemed to creep
through me. Its effect upon the rest of the congregation was even more remarkable. The hassocks
were arranged in a semi-circle around the image of the bird. Some of the figures which sat upon
them had their faces covered by their hands; others swayed with their eyes closed. Still others
had their hands clasped around their legs. About half were women, their ages between twenty and
thirty. As I watched, a man stood up, moved towards the statue, and threw a rolled-up piece of
paper into the water. Nothing happened for a few minutes, as he took his place again among the
worshippers, in his eyes a far-away look. Then a woman, with smiling face and hands beating out
the melody on her sides, approached the silent bird and said: "Thank you, thank you!"

The same kind of action was repeated by several more worhippers. After thirty minutes I noticed
half the people had left the room.

Meanwhile, my priest had apparently fallen into a trance. He sat on the floor, body rigid, eyes
staring, unwinkingly open. Someone, about to leave the room, accidentally touched him, and
became rigid in his turn, slowly sinkin down upon his knees, his muscles stiffening, eyes turned
towards the peacock.

Being a witness to a scene such as this is sure to have some effect upon the observer. I noted that
if I looked at the statue and listened to the music, I felt wave upon wave of something sweeping
over me. Whether this is suggestion or not, it was actually takin place in the only place it
mattered, my mind, and the mind was influencing the body into greater and greater rigidity. I
found that I could inhibit this process, by looking at something else. Finally, I decided to allow
the experience to take shape. I would partake of the mystery of the power of the peacock. . . .

One did not lose consciousness, I found. The mind became more and more awake, while the body
seemed to recede in some way into complete unimportance. The sensation, as it grew, was one of
the most ineffable relief, of joy, or happiness, such as one had only felt before in moments of
exceptional fulfillment. Time had no meaning. There was nothing in the mind, except the desire to
allow this blissfull state to continue; for it seemed to pour fresh strength into me.

I was able, at the same time, to take some note of what was going on around me, and also to think, if
I wished, of other thins. The first extraordinary development within my thinking was that, when I
let myself think about a certain problem, the solution suddenly flashed into my mind. This had
the same quality of certainty when one dreams that one has settled one's worries. The difference
this time was that the solution was in fact correct, and I was able to act upon it later.
The second phenomenon was a vast expansion of memory. Tryin to recall a time about which my
memory was slight, I fixed upon a moment, many years ago, when I was carrying out a study of
symbols used in ancient cultures. Anyone who has had the difficulty of absorbing and correlating
masses of almost meaningless designs would understand how I felt when I suddenly realized the
shapes were whirling past my mind like an unreeling film. There was all the material, avaialble
whenever I wanted to see it, stop it, reel it back. . . .

Had I been doped? I examined this thought at leisure. Yes, it was possible. could test this by not
eating or drinking anything next time, if there was to be a next time. Meanwhile, I tried to recall
the symptoms of the use of various drugs - and the whole complicated data, which I had read and
discussed years ago, flashed back with my amazing new mind. Yet I could not account for the
symptoms: unless I was in such a state that I was in no condition to seek them in myself,
physically speaking. There was no disturbance of sight; no vomiting, no sweating, no apparent
difference in the heartbeat, no sensation of flying, no shortness of breath, no distortion as far as I
could see in thought. . . . Was it hypnosis? It was easy enough to think it might be, but no form of
hypnotism is conclusively known without suggestion, in spite of what the sensational novelists
say. It is easy to use such phrases as 'suggestibility induced by drugs,' but any experimenter
knows that the effects vary, and also that the phrase has less meaning than it seems to have.

If I were drugged, or hypnotized, I would be able to see by one test - could I rouse myself, then
slip back into the state at will? I tried. And I could. Then there was the matter of idiosyncrasy,
which the would-be dopers could not know. I was, for example, a very difficult hypnotic subject.
Furhter my tolerance to drugs is so low that in all cases of narcotics being administered to me, I
have had a most severe hangover, and cannot be roused easily. I decided, therefore, to rouse
myself, and go to the other room to see what my symptoms might be then.

I stood, shaking off the influence, whatever it was. In an instant all seemed clear again. Opening
the door, I moved quietly through the passage, where a number of peacock people were sitting,
talking in low tones. I sat down on a settee. Nothing seemed in any way changed. There was no
explanation.

- source: Arkon Daraul (Idris Shah), A History of Secret Societies, ch. 15

Illuminati History 101.I::
the Bildeberg Group and Bohemian Grove Camp:
a communique for the IOBB2.

Quote:
The Bilderberg Group, Bilderberg conference, or Bilderberg Club is an unofficial, annual,
invitation-only conference of around 130 guests, most of whom are persons of influence in the
fields of politics, business, and banking. The participants talk about a variety of global issues,
economic, military, and political.

The Bilderberg group unofficial headquarters is the University of Leiden in the Netherlands.
Meetings are organized by a steering committee comprised of two members each (to represent
conservative and liberal points of view) from around eighteen nations. Offical posts, in addition to
a chairman, include an Honorary Secretary General.

"According to the club rules, the members talk on one specific subject for 7 minutes, and
comments, additions or questions may be introduced by the rest within 1 minute. Their only
obligation is not to publish or disclose anything discussed." And "A record is made of the club’s
discussions in which, however, the name of the speaker is never published. The official language
is English, and the conversation notes are later published in a book."

Chairmen
• Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands (1954 - 1975)
• Alec Douglas-Home (1977 - 1980)
• Walter Scheel
• Eric Roll (1986 - 1989)
• Lord Carrington (1990 - 1998)
• Étienne Davignon

Bilderberg frequent participant David Rockefeller has said in his book “Memoirs”, on page 405:

"Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United
States, characterizing my family and me as "internationalists" and of conspiring with others
around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure - one world,
if you will. If that's the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.""

- source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bilderberg_Group

- see also: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Bilderberg_attendees

Bohemian Grove and the George W. Bush Administration*

GEORGE BUSH SR.--Father and Past President--Hillbillies Camp**

DONALD RUMSFELD--Bush Cabinet-Secretary of Defense--Hillbillies Camp

JAMES BAKER lll--Election Advisor and Spokesman--Woof Camp

GEORGE SCHULTZ--Election Advisor and Spokesman--Mandalay Camp

COLIN POWELL--Bush Cabinet--Secretary of State--Frequent Guest and Speaker in the '80s and
90's at the Summer encampment-May now be a member

RICHARD CHENEY--Vice President--frequent guest. Last spotted in July 2000

JOHN J. O'CONNOR lll--Husband of U.S. Supreme Court Justice

SANDRA DAY O'CONNOR who recently cast pivitol Supreme Court vote for George W --- Pelicans
Camp (Sandra herself cannot belong to the Grove as no women are allowed)

ANTONIN SCALIA--Justice, U.S. Supreme Court--Bohemian Grove Lakeside Talk: July 25, 1997
Subject: Church, State and the Constitution

A.W. CLAUSEN (past president World Bank and Bank of America)-Hillbillies Camp

EDWIN MEESE lll--Cave Man Camp (same as Richard Nixon and Herbert Hoover)

HENRY KISSINGER--Former Reagan Secretary of State--Mandalay Camp

STANFORD'S HOOVER INSTITUTE--Strongly connected to Bohemian Grove

------------------------------------------------------------------------

*Camp memberships taken from the 1997 KEY TO CAMP LOCATIONS which is the latest list we
have been able to obtain from inside the Grove. Lakeside talks from Bohemian Grove Programs of
Events.

**Hillbillies Camp (George Bush, Donald Rumsfeld) also has a membership overlap with many
other members of Yales Skull & Bones society.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Bohemian Grove “Cremation of Care” ritual, transcirption follows:

Robed men enter an area in front of a 40 foot high statue of an owl the Bohemians call Mo-Loch as
bagpipes play. The robed men assemble in front of Mo-Loch. 2 different "priests" will speak
during the ritual and the voice of Dull Care will also be heard.

Priest 1: The owl is in his leafy temple. Let all within the grove be reverent before him. Lift up
your heads, oh ye trees, and be ye lifted up ye everlasting spires. For behold! Here is Bohemia's
shrine and holy are the pillars of this house. Weaving spiders, come not here.

Priest 2: Hail Bohemians with the ripple of waters, the song of birds, such music as inspires the
sinking soul do we invite you into mid-summer's joy. The sky above is blue and sown with stars.
The forest floor is heaped with fragrant grit. The evenings cool kiss is yours. The campfires slow.
The birth of rosy fingered dawn. Shake off your sorrows with the city's dust and cast to the winds
the cares of life. But memories bring back the well-loved names of gallant friends who knew and
loved this grove. Dear, boon companions of the long ago. Aye! Let them join us in this ritual and
not a place be empty in our midst. All of his battles to hold in this gray autumn of the world or in
the springtime of your heart. Attend our tale. Gather ye forest folk and cast your spell over these
mortals. Touch their world-blind eyes with carrion. Open their eyes to fancy. Follow the
memories of yesterday and seal the gates of sorrow. It is a dream, and, yet, not all a dream. Dull
care and all of his works harbored it. As vanished Babylon and goodly Tyre. So shall they also
vanish. But the wilding rose blows in the broken battlement of Tyre and moss rends the stones of
Babylon. For beauty is eternal and we bow to beauty everlasting. For lasting happiness, we turn to
one alone. As she surrounds you now, great nature, refuge of the weary heart. And only found her
breasts that had been bruised. She has cool hands for every fevered brow and dreadless silence
for the troubled soul. Her councils are most wise. She healeth well having such ministries as calm
and sleep. She is ever faithful. Other friends may fail, but seek ye her in any quiet place smiling,
she will rise and give to you her kiss. So must ye come as children. Little children that believe
don't ever doubt her beauty and her faith, nor deem her tenderness can change or die.

Priest 1: Bohemians and priests. The desperate call of heavy hearts is answered. By the power of
your fellowship, dull care is slain. His body has been brought yonder to our funeral pyre to the
joyous pipings of a funeral march. Our funeral pyre awaits the corpse of care.

An effigy of Dull Care is brought to the statue by way of boat across the lake.

Priest 2: Oh thou, thus ferried across the shadowy tide in all the ancient majesty of death. Dull
care, ardent enemy of beauty. Not for thee the [garbled] forgiveness of the restful grave. Fire shall
have its way with thee and all the winds make merry with thy dust. Bring Fire!

Dull Care: (Laughter) Fools! Fools! Fools! When will you learn that me ye cannot slay? Year after
year ye burn me in this grove. Lifting your puny shouts of triumph to the stars. When again ye
turn your faces to the marketplace, do ye not find me waiting as of old? Fools! Fools! Fools to
dream ye conquer care!

Priest 2: Say thous mocking spirit. It is not all a dream. We know thous waitest for us. When this
our sylvan holiday has ended, we shall meet thee and fight thee as of old and some of us prevail
against thee and some thou shalt destroy. But, this to we know. Year after year, within this happy
grove, our fellowship bans the for a space. Thine malevolence which would pursue us here has lost
its power under these friendly trees. So shall we burn thee once again this night and with the
flames that eat thine effigy we shall read the sign. Mid-summer sets us free!

Dull Care: Ye shall burn me once again?(Laughter) Not with these flames which hither ye have
brought from regions where I reign. Ye fools and priests. I spit upon your fire!

A pyrotechnic shoots from a treetop or tower over to the altar of Mo-Loch and ignites the
sacrifice.

Priest 2: Oh Owl! Prince of all mortal wisdom, Owl of Bohemia, we beseech thee, grant us thy
council.

Song Lyrics: No fire! No fire! No fire! Unless it be kindled in the world where care is nourished on
the hates of men and drive him from this grove. One flame alone must light this fire. One flame
alone must light this fire. A pure eternal flame. A pure eternal flame. At last within the lamp of
fellowship upon the altar of Bohemia.
Priest 2: Oh great Owl of Bohemia. We thank thee for thy adoration. Be gone detested care! Be gone!
Once more, we banish thee! Be gone Dull Care! Fire shall have its will of thee. Be gone Dull Care
and all the winds make merry with thy dust! Hail fellowship's eternal flame! Once again, mid-
summer sets us free!

Dull Care: (Agonizing Scream)

:: auto-stereogram ::

:: original image::
Symbols of the
Illuminati Symbolism 101.A::
the eye, the pyramid, the circumpunct and the triangle:
a communique for the IOBB2.

abstract:

In the past I have discussed thoroughly enough the eye in the pyramid motif as it
appears in the IO/Masonic reverse-side of the USA’s “great seal” symbol. The 13 steps
leading up to the missing capstone, the tetrahedronal capstone, the left eye, the three
steps leading up the iris into the pupil, and all their dimensions should be familiar to
my readers before they begin this. Other symbolism of the IO (the Pentagon,
Washington monument and statue of liberty) do not need to have been researched
prior to reading this article.

In this brief summation I intend to break down the symbolism of the “eye of
providence” above the “pyramid with no capstone” motif of the IO to its most
rudimentary moral explanations. No grounding in past Masonic nor IO usage of this
symbol will be necessary.

introduction:

It has been said, by many lesser minds than mine, that the “true” or “secret” symbol
of the IO is the point or dot within a circle. To Masons, this symbol is not complete
without the twin vertical pillars of the two Saint Johns of Christian antiquity aligned
on either side of it. However from the perspective of Adam Weishaupt, founder of the
IO and avid student of Maosnic lore, the denuded circum- (circle) -punct (point) was a
symbol of Persian Zoroastrianism, which he (wrongly) identified as Hindu Parsi in
origin. To Weishaupt, the circumpunct was a solar symbol of light, heat and strength.
To we in the Perfectibilist IO today, it has these meanings and many more. We know it
also as a symbol of the ajna chakra (or third eye), of alchemical gold (the perfected
stone), of molecular elemental Hydrogen and other, cosmic perfect orbitals, of a
mathematical theorem by Thales, and of Kether or the Monad in mysticism. We know
of these meanings even via public resources for information, such as the internet,
however there remain many teachings that are reserved to those of us (such as
myself) with large libraries of real books who belong to our order today. I wish to
share some of these with you now for posterity.

Part 1:: The Circumpunct:

The standard circumpunct is a centroid dot encompassed by a circle. It is taken,
within the modern IO, as symbolic of the same essential notion as the eye in the
pyrmid or the statue of liberty. However, rather than seen from the front, this
symbol is here showing us the same motif from above, looking straight down on it.
Students of basic geometry will quickly realise the implication by this simple
observation on this symbol for it to stand, not only for the square-based pyramid, but
also for a circular conic section. For students of the novel “Flatland,” it should ring
an especial bell regarding the curved or bowed out “light-cone” of universal
expansion since the “big bang” - the circle symbolic of our expanded universe today,
the point of the original moment of our cosmic creation. As the “sphere” of the 4th
dimension passes through the “plane” of our own 3-d realm, it appears as a
hyperbolically expanding curvature that approaches critical mass before the
beginning of the “big crunch” when all time rewinds to the beginning again.

According to modern, standardised mathematics, there are four basic shapes the
“circumpunct” model can assume if taken as a “slice” of such a conical surface: 1)
the usual dot in a circle; 2) an ellipse with two focal points; 3) a parabola that
approaches absolute finitidue asymptotically; 4) a hyperbola that approaches
absolute infinitude asymptotically.

It should hardly need mentioning here to spark the imagination of my readers to

thoughts of Moiré patterns and Tesla’s normalised “scalar” wave-fields. Just as the
circumpunct models universal expansion assuming, beyond “c,” ZPE resistance; so too
do all the conical “slices” make measures of the same model. For example, the concept
of an elliptical “parallel” dimensional time-line for our universe passing through
the usual, flat, circumpunct method of measuring a “slice” in the light-cone of time
would result in a 4th dimensional tremor alike inverse Moire patterns as their
centroid points are brought closer to convergeance. As the dual elliptical focal points
approached one another they would form an interference pattern in the field of the
flat elliptical event-plane, until the two points converged into a single circumpunct.
It should also be of note that, in such a model where an elliptical “brane” were
moving through our own “event-horizon” or “slice” of time, cycles and patterns in
matter-energy sub-space, effected by the force of gravity, would experience
increasingly regular patterns until the point when the two points merged into one.
This would continue in the pattern of an asymptote, alike that assumed in the cases of
the parabola and hyperbola. As a final note about tesselations of harmonic
frequencies as strange attractors, graphed alike fractals and quaternions, note the
tyling of the Masonic “trestleboard” that tapers off into infinity along the horizon.

To return, briefly, to some Masonic explanations for the circumpunct, which I have
also illustrated is a modern symbol for a temporal “slice” in our omnipresent
universal expansion, we may quote some various sources for such from Masonic
scholars themselves, but beyond this, we may say no more on it from Masonry’s view.
“Ritualistically, this is a symbol of control of conduct; a standard of right living. The
symbol has an extreme antiquity. Early Egyptian monuments are carved with the
Alpha and the Omega or symbol of God in the center of a circle embordered by two
upright parallel perpendicular serpents, representing the power and wisdom of the
Creator. The symbol apparently came into Masonry from an operative practice,
known to but a few Master workmen on Cathedrals and great buildings. Any school
boy knows it now; put a dot on a circle anywhere; draw a straight line across the
circle through its center; connect the dot with the points at which the line through
the center cuts the circle; the result is a perfect square. This was the Operative
Master’s great secret - knowing how to “try the square” It was by this that he tested
the working tools of the Fellows of the Craft; did he do so often enough, it was
impossible either for their tools or their work “to materially err”.

Excerpted from “Handbook for Candidate’s Coaches” By The Committee on Ritual and
Donald G. Campbell, Past Grand Lecturer, Grand Lodge F.&A.M. of California.

http://www.freemasons-freemasonry.com/point_within_circle.html

Wilford says (Asiatic Researches): “It was! believed in India that at the general
deluge everything was involved in the common destruction except the male and
female principles or organs of generation, which were destined to produce a new
race and to repeople the earth when the waters had subsided from its surface.! The
female principle, symbolized by the moon, assumed the form of a lunette, or crescent,
while the male principle, symbolized by the sun, assumed the form of the lingam (or
phallus) and placed himself erect in the center of the lunette, like the mast of a
ship.! The two principles in this united form floated on the surface of the waters
during the period of their prevalence on the earth, and thus became the progenitors
of a new race of men.”

http://www.masonicworld.com/education/files/artoct02/point_within_a_circle.htm

This line of reasoning is more in keeping with the traditional sentiments of Alesiter
Crowley and his followers in NASA and JPL who built Hubble. Thus, we see the same
symbol of the circumpunct showing up in both Crowley’s logo for himself under his
cult monicker “To Mega Therion,” and the much later logo for the US space
program’s orbital telescope.

In discussing the circumpunct symbol it is also important that we not forget to

mention its relationship to the perfect triangle, as the ideal hyperbola is an exactly
perpendicular “slice” to our own temporary moment that we call our here and now.
However before we move onto the triangle, the last points that are worth mentioning
regarding the circumpunct are in regards to the conical “dunce” cap adroning the
heads of accused “witches” during the Inquistion (the Catholic purge of the Gnostics)
being also associable with this same symbol, inverted into a championship for the
light of hope by the Bavarian IO. In Weishaupt’s own system for encryption of his IO
documents, the circumpunct appeared as the letter “S.” This is why Weishaupt signed
all his correspondences with it: his codename in the IO was “Spartacus,” and
Spartacus begins with the letter “S,” symbolised in the IO cipher as a circumpunct.

Part 2:: The Triangle:

To quote the Masonic source cited earlier, “every shcool boy knows” also about basic
trigonometry, the study of triangles on a flat surface. While the study of conic “slice”
sections is considered a specialised section in this study, the use of the major forms of
triangle (isocoles, scalene and right) that occur on a flat surface to comprise most of
the rest, often leaving out the sorts of triangles that can occur on non-flat surfaces.
Much is taught in schools about sines, cosines and tangents. Little is learned about
the use of all-right angled triangles to plot trajectory windows by NASA computers.
Such an “impossible” triangle occurs on the surface of a sphere such as our planet,
where 90° angled lines of longitude intersect at 90°s with the equatorial lattitude.
The “impossible” all right-angled triangle is symbolised in the ancient logo called
today the “triskele.” It symbolises the same force as the polar S-shaped spiral as the
“Yin Yang,” but as a triangle instead of a double. Just as the “yin yang” is a symbol
for constant changes occuring in our thermosphere (now called entropy), the so-
called “tao” of “chi,” so too does the circular triskele symbolise an energy pattern
prevalent in the universal order, the “trinity” or “law of three.” To Pythagoreans, 3
was the first whole number, because at this odd prime fibonacci sum is when, in
social groups, Democracy can begin. Socially speaking, for Pythagoras, the Trinity is
the Monad.

However, just as there are “good” and “bad” karma expressed in the “yin yang”
symbol’s dipolarity, so also are these possible for the 3 traits of the triskele. This can
be expressed using colour coding, rotational oritentation (clockwise or counter-
clockwise) or by substituting square, right-angled corners for the symbolic circle.
Just as the triple “6” shapes of the triskele can each be either “good” or “bad,” the 3
legs of the “impossible” all right-angled triangle’s triple “7” are 3-in-1 and 1-in-3,
inseperable, all good or all bad as one, either “clockwise” or “counter-clockwise.”
As has already been shown in this lecture, the “eye” (esp. the eye of providence,
symbolising the right eye of God, originally the God Horus-Ra) is a symbol for the
circumpunct. Just so, the “pyramid” (esp. the 13 stepped US seal on the dollar) is
merely a symbol for the triangle. The triangle around the eye in the depiction of the
eye over the pyramid itself symbolises a tetrahedron, a shape whose triangular base
would not fit evenly as the missing cap-stone of the great pyramid. The “eye” in the
middle of the triangle symbolises the fourth apex, projected outward toward the
viewer into 3rd dimensional space. This occurs in the same way that the circumpunct
reveals a cone.

Part 3:: Symbolic Meaning:

No two people will immediately agree to accept either one’s strict first interpretation
of the meaning of this symbol. They will argue it out, then agree on this:
 “It is a symbol for what we don’t know. It is meant to catch our eye.”

It should be noted that, though the earliest known occurance of this specific
combination of symbols, the eye in the pyramid, does date back to the founders of the
US constitution, with their design for the “US Great Seal” in 1782, that it was not until
1935 that this symbol began appearing on the back of the US 1$ bill. Franklin
Roosevelt, US president at the time, made the final design change (to place the great
seal’s front on the right and back on the left of the back of the dollar bill’s design) to
emphasize the significance of, “Fortune Favours A New World Order,” its slogan’s
similitary to his political platform at that time, called the “New Deal.” His desire was
to associate the pyramid symbol with his political platform by placing it on money.

Since 1935, this symbol has appeared everywhere in US media. It has been adopted by
numerous corporations as their logo, incorporated into countless films, commercials,
print advertisements and product-packaging, and has so totally saturated our
subconsciousness, its target market, that it has become a bill-board inside our mind,
reflecting outward alike a mirror the apparatus of our self-awareness. The fact this
symbol, taken as a mirror logo for our own mind, is on money is often assumed is
meant to symbolise the enslavement of our minds to money. This association is not far
off the mark from the modern IO perspective, which also believes the masses worship
money now instead of God. Thus, this definition for God, this profane idolatrous
blasphemy, this mark of the beast itself, being on money is only apt. From the
modern IO’s point of view, this is a symbol of our age-old enslavement to feelings of
endebtedness that do not really exist, to a father-figure we idealise and then blame
for not living up to our own expectaitions, be He God or Pope. This stresses the
mission of the modern IO: to free the minds of the masses by overturning their
existent social and religious instiutitions.

The idea of putting a symbol for God onto money serves the modern IO’s agenda well,
yet only synthetically, and only sympathetically. It induces an emotional reaction of
aversion to see this symbol on money. This is the spark of hope for mental freedom.
Part 4:: Use in Media:

In the media nowadays, the “eye in the pyramid” is a symbol for psychic power. It
has been associated with the religion of money for the last 75 years, and is a widely
accepted logo of the IO everywhere on earth. The “eye in the pyramid” is seen as not
the eye of God, but merely the eye of our boss, our work’s Over-seer, who himself
serves Pharoah, and is but a link in a long chain, as we work on building our modern
corporate hive-pyramids. We see this ancient Egyptian symbol on our modern money
and think of it, rightly, as our own modern Church, our modern religion, contrary
on the seal’s sides to the military might of the modern State, our shadow government.

The IO who developed this symbol have developed others to replace its original use in
their group. Since then, the ideogram of the “eye in the pyramid” symbolising
Weishaupt (S for Spartacus = circumpunct) uber allis, has been replaced several
times over as a secret seal among the elite echelon’s ranks. The “secret seal” symbol
is now so common it serves instead as a constant public reminder of the supremacy of
the NWO as not merely an ideal, but a realised ideal utopia we are living in now today.

The IO has used other symbols in its evolution since then. In 1782, when the “secret
seal” was designed by Masons, infiltrated by IO ideals, it was considered a controversy
among some circles to reveal something so symbolically meaningful in even so
public a way as that. However now, the IO’s public face, the US CIA, uses an anagram
of letters that, when all overlapped, form the “eye in the pyramid” ideogram, to
symbolise their “central intelligence agency”s supremacy in the field of spying. Of
course, the very existence of a state-sponsored espionage agency should be illegal,
but this point escapes most modern conversations under the watchful gaze of “Big
Brother.”

The other symbols the evolved IO use I have discussed elsewhere. They include the
skull and bones and the Bohemian owl, and revolve around a prediliction with death
and the experience one’s psyche itself undergoes while dying. The skull and cross-
bones, symbol of financial piracy, and “Bohemian” owl, symbol of spy-craft, are evil.
However, during the time the old IO has evolved into the modern Bildeberg Group,
CFR, Trilateral Comission, Club of Rome, etc. etc. etc., the original IO’s philosophy of a
“Christian” (familist) “Utopia” to replace the existing structures of society and
religion has been forgotten. Weishaupt himself envisioned a far different “playing
field” for international relations than we have today. This idealism has since been
lost, which is why the old IO ceased being the driving occult factor behind these
groups at the time of the “Golden Dawn,” when the last IO cult, the “Brotherhood of
Luxor” was transformed by Aleister Crowley and others into the “Order of Oriental
Templars” around 100 years ago. The symbols of the skull and bones and the owl do
not represent either the old, original IO’s ideals nor those of this incarnation of the
new IO. They represent, instead, the OTO.

However, the symbol of the “eye in the pyramid” as an ideogram of Weishaupt’s ideal
utopia, accomplished by only temporarily using the “pyramid scheme” of banks and
industries, meant to achieve the ends of a “city on a hill” alike the dreams of St.
Anselm, St. Augustine, St. Aquinas and Thomas Moore, remains a symbol of the true IO
to this day. Its use in big budget media to front the secret agenda behind the NWO
disgusts us. Yet we witness it every day. Here are some examples from the
entertainment industry:

The symbol of the “eye in the pyramid” appears everywhere; books, music, movies...
Here it is from a cover of Time-Life publications’ “Mysteries of the Unknown” series,
from the book “Mystic Places.” It is a depiction of a glowing eye atop the great
pyramid of Giza, Egypt, from a perspective below and in front of the Great Sphynx.

Here it is in a somewhat more symbolic form, depicted as a prism splitting a beam of

white light (emanating from the left) into a spectrum of 7 colour rays (emanating to
the right), from the cover of the band Pink Floyd’s album “Dark Side of the Moon.”

Here it is from the poster for the film directed by Stanley Kubrick based on the book
by Anthony Burgess, “A Clockwork Orange,” about brainwashing and mind-control.
Although it remains prevalent in other industries, it is most often used in, and most
effectively placed within the plot-lines of, Hollywood films and movies. It is usually
used as a main plot device, yet as a foible meant to symbolise a “MacGuffin,” a film
term for any arbitrary prop necessary to forward the story-line. Here are some
examples where it has been used in big budget movies from recent years:

According to the Hollywood film industry’s “underworld” visions of a history for its
modern archetypal symbols, the “pyramid” origin story is told in the film, directed
by Roland Emmerich, “10,000 BC.” According to this, mastadon hunting European
cave people were conscripted to build the Great Pyramid of Giza, Egypt, which also
orginally had a golden capstone. This task was designed and overseen by an alien
whom, until the lead character toppled him in combat, had enslaved his workers to
believe he was a God. This character, although never named in this movie, is
equivalent to the character “Ra” in the parallel movie/tv series “Star Gate.” Thus, at
the time the workers rebelled against finishing it, and destroyed the capstone, the
pyramid symbolised “Ra,” whose right eye symbolised the sun.

Thus, the “builder” or “Great Architect” having been run off or killed, the Great
Pyramid, as a symbol for the “Great Work” of all Masons (already familiar via the
craft with Solomon’s Temple) was then left as a symbol of a lost great civilisation. The
blueprints to it, however, were lost.

In films such as “Tomb Raider,” where the IO feature prominently, the “eye in the
triangle” design is taken to represent the key to restoring the lost meaning of the
pyramid itself by recovering its mislaid schematic plans. In “Tomb Raider” and other
films, like “the Dark Crystal,” where the pyramid is symbolised by a crystal, the task
to restore the pyramid’s missing capstone is coupled with the approaching dead-line
of a planetary and solar alignment. Such an alignment as depicted in “Tomb Raider”
did actually occur in the year 2000.
The quest to restore the missing capstone features prominently as a symbolic theme
in many, many Hollywood movies. Each time the “eye in the triangle” relic shows up,
there is a clue given about the progress being made on this quest today. The Hero of
this “grail quest” has many names, but the plot-line they undergo is always the same,
and a vague and brief summation of the finer points of Biblical history as well. The
hero is a symbol of humanity in general, like the Fool trump of tarot, and their role
regarding the pyramid is to climb it, to declare themselves a new “king of the hill.”
The pyramid, in this sense, is a symbol also like the scale, weighing life and death.

The pyramid, thus also like the scales, is a symbol for the Apocalyptic Judgment Day,
when God reveals himself upon earth. The Hero in this scheme then is a Fool seeking
immortality for their mind through a series of alchemically transformative stages.
Part 4a: the Cult of Anubis

Because the Judgment of the soul is, originally, an Egyptian myth, as are the great
pyramids of the arid Giza plateau, it should not be surpirsing to find another
Egyptian theme among the cards now. The cult of those who keep the “eye in the
triangle” symbol of the “eye in the pyramid” design safe, ostensibly, as do, in many
movies, the IO ourselves, are devoted to the cause of worshipping death and the act of
the mind leaving the body at the moment the soul ceases to breathe within its lungs.
As such, the mummification ritual from which the “Final Judgment” concept
originates is often acted out in movies, as an allusion to this cult of death. Please
remember, my readers, that I have said the IO was not the OTO nor the OTO’s NWO. The
IO split into 3 branches at Yale University around the turn of the 20th century: 1)
Skull and Bones, which was funded as an opium running front; 2) the Scroll and Key,
who comprised the Greaco-Roman legal wing of the Babylonian Brotherhood, the
Skull and Bones; 3) the Wolf’s Head, comprising an Egyptian faction devoted to the
prommotion of pagan rituals in media. The Wolf’s Head frat, whatever its condition
now, was intended to front the “eye in the pyramid” symbol in media as often as
possible. To this end, they have succeeded. That it was this cultish group that has done
this is marked by their calling card, the jackal headed Egyptian deity, Anubis.

What “Young Sherlock Holmes” discovered, in Steven Spielberg’s 1985 film of that
title, when he unlocked the secret of the pyramid and went tumbling down his own
form of Alice’s rabbit-hole into Wonderland was the truth at the heart of the pyramid
itself: it is empty, as a symbol reflecting our own conscience, and populated, at least
in films, by a single deity, not Ra, not the sun-God, but Anubis, the God of death. The
reason for this should, by this point, I hope, be clear: Horus-Ra was, according to the
chronology of the Hollywood mythos, killed or fled at the time the Great pyramid was
built. Since then, the empty and meaningless pyramid has been guarded by the cult
of Anubis, whose symbol has long been, is today, and will always remain, a left eye in
a triangle, symbolisng the cult of night protecting the pyramid during the absence
of the sun.
It seems only fitting to leave this section of my essay with a scene from the late
Stanley Kubrick’s 1999 masterpiece and swan-song to an imagination-industry gone
dead wrong, “Eyes Wide Shut,” adapted from the novel “Dream Story.” Although this
film is repleat with what most would consider “Satanic” imagery, allow me to offer
this as an alternative explanation instead: rather than merely gross “Satanism,” the
ritual scene portrayed in the film and book it was based on portrays an ancient cult
of Egyptian ritualists performing their strange cosmological arts in modern times.
The ceremony shown in “Eyes Wide Shut,” however crude, must be deemed decidedly
a carnival of cosmic chronological cycles. Obviously, Thoth as ibis is a player, and
Anubis, in blue, remains second only to, in red, the Anti-Pope, or elder Fool, often
symbolised as Maat in the Egyptianists’ rites, adorned by the head of a ram. Thoth
symbolises time, Maat the judgment, Anubis death and Horus-Ra the sun. These
“archetypes” of the “collective unconscious” are at least as old as pre-Pharoahnic
unification of upper and lower Egypt, around 6,000 years ago or so.
It should be worth noting, in closing this section on the “eye in the pyramid”
symbol’s use in modern media, that this symbol’s use in media is: A) arbitrary, in that
it has inherited a symbol of the IO, but does not understand what this symbol means;
and B) entirely fictional, in that it has no definite meaning, and all those assigned to
it by the media are inventions of “movie magic” alone, not to be believed as a reality.
Thus, the use of this symbol in media cannot be considered properietary of the IO
anymore, even though we invented it. Its intended meaning has been enitrely lost.

Now, the symbol in media is used to revere capitalism, and is often associated with
sexual symbolism in place of the symbolism of the Judgment at death. The replacemet
of death with sex symbolism is significant of sales. Capitalism is the ultimate act of sex
sublimation, the redirecting of progenative energy into an animation of dead matter.
This “creative impulse” is a cornerstone of civility, replacing rape with the pyramid.
Likewise, the careful bottle-necking nozel dispensing catharsis, the equivlanet of
sublimation for aggressive energy, is handed over to the cult of Anubis. The evolved
IO of the Wolf’s Head frat then lures us into introspection over their products,
replacing the threat of violence at the barrel of a gun with the pupil of a spying eye.
So, capitalism is symbolised by the “eye” of aggressive carthasis above the “pyramid”
of sexual sublimation; but this is not a symbol of the idealism expressed by the IO.
Part 5:: Subliminal Use:

As I have already stated, there is the use of this symbol in the media, subliminal or
not, and then there is the use of this symbol by the IO, subliminal or not. The use of
this symbol in the media means one thing, the “eternal quest” for money, which is
seen as a natural reward for personal self-improvement. The use of this symbol by
the IO means something totally different. This symbol, as I have demonstrated thus
far, can be used by the media to a certain level of subliminal messaging. It can be
“hidden in plain sight” and thus be used as a fulcrum to lever open the mind’s eye.
However, the level of subliminal messaging accessable by advertisers in the media is
of a far, far less effective means than that used by we true Illuminati. This is what
distinguishes the use of this symbol, the “eye in the pyramid,” in media from its use,
as it was originally intended, by the IO: the symbol remains a mystery to the media,
assumed to represent their own hollow goals; to the IO, the symbol remains as it was
originally intended, as a representation of our own perfect form of government.

Because there are these twin levels of depth to the meaning of this symbol - between
that known by the public media, the “Wolf’s Head” controlled Hollywood advertising
industry, etc.; and that known to the original IO, which has evolved into our own
modern, though autonomous, IO of today - there are also different levels of depth to
which this symbol can be applied - between that of subliminal messaging in public
advertising; and that accessable by the true IO. Here we see the depths to which this
symbol can sink when in the hands of the real Illuminati.
Illuminati Symbolism 101.B::
from: where the IO stands today
a communique for the IOBB2.

Part 1A:: IO Axiom 1A (the kingdom of the blind):

1) "In the Kingdom of the Blind, the One Eye'd Man Is King."

What does this mean? It means that the masses are the "blind" and the individual the
"one-eyed man." This much is clear. But there are subtler meanings, and layers upon
layers. First:

A) what is the individual, and what are the masses?

The Sovereign Individual: an individual can only be considered their own ruler after
following a series of steps: 1) recognise one is not in control over themselves, but is a
mental and emotional slave to society's values. 2) they must seek a teacher or
someone to embody this Mastery of themselves, then learn how to challenge and
topple this teacher. 3) to be worthy of consideration of sovereignty, one must then
resist the temptation to rule over others and to manipulate students to follow them. 4)
one who has resisted the urge to become a teacher is worthy of the universal
brotherhood of sharing their learnings equally with others who are also sovereign
individuals. Thus, this is the Sovereign Individual.

the "Masses": the "blind" and the "sleepers," the "sheeple" and the "goyim," the
"chattle" and the "gentiles," etc. etc. etc. are simply those who are not "Sovereing
Individuals." There are fewer Sovereign Individuals, who have followed the above
course of training, than there are the "Masses." Some believe we should shepherd the
masses in order to feed off their abilities. Others believethe "Masses" must be
instructed by Sovereign Individuals on how to become such, in order the Masses may
be "set free." Ultimately, the "masses" chose to NOT be sovereign individuals, then
forgot having made the choice. They are the so-called "Blue Pills" in the "Matrix" of
our society. To enslave or to save these people is the prime directive of the Soverieng
Individual.

B) What is the Kingdom, and who is the King?

The Kingdom: the Kingdom is Malkuth, and I will not claim it is either a Mystical
"underworld" or "afterlife," as in the "Kingdom of Heaven," nor merely the world of
terrestrial reality, clearly ruled by Satan, the demi-urge or will to self-destruction. It
is both, and not only is this duality already one, but already this one is nothing. Such
is the Kingdom of Malkuth, the microcosm on the surface of which is reflected the
macrocosm, such that "As Above, So Below." This reflection of the Greater Good is
distorted into the pure Higher Self and the refraction of the lesser will to power. The
Kingdom is the Temple of the Self, on all levels.

The King: the King is clearly Ha Maschiach, the King who is, was and will be. So
where is the Messiah today? Some say he is within, as "Christ Consciousness,"
accessable within each of us. But this is only the "Anti-Christ" or "demi-urge," the
desire to be martyred, the "Christ Complex." The King is the still centre point within
the mind, which is unmoved and unmoving. Time flows around this sort of mind like
a stream around a stone. Such a mind experiences its thoughts like clouds passing
through a net. These thoughts come from beyond, and return to their source,
through the still mind. Such a mind "transcends" mundane care, and becomes
"Illumined" to Ylem, the "primary clear light."

C) Who are the "blind" and who is the "one eye'd man"?

The Blind, therefore, are the masses, but the "one eye'd man" is thus the Messiah. But
the relationship between these two is mysterious. The Masses believe the Messiah is
not here now, but will return to save them. The Messiah himself may have different
beliefs, if he does live now, but this cannot be known so long as his identity remains
unknown. The priests, who the Masses believe have replaced the Messiah, teach that
the Messiah is a Sovereign Individual at birth, but comes to forget this fact as they
age, but then will remember it later in life. This mimics the concept of the "Running
and Returning" Messiah myth. This myth has "served us well," according to the
priests.

The Messiah is free to be a priest, but obviously not all the priests are the One
Messiah. It is more likely the Messiah will appear from among the Masses, as one of
them who, as the priests teach, had forgotten and then remembered their destined
role. The role of the Messiah relative to the priests is expected to be one of rejection:
the "Stone the Builders Rejected" and the rebellious Jesus who preached against the
doubters and the liars, the Sadducees and Pharisees. The Messiah is expected to rebel
and overthrow the NWO. But will they? Only time will illuminate this more.

2) The Illuminati are a group of Sovereign Individuals. We speak on behalf of the

Wisest course of action for humanity. Who is the "Illuminati"? We have been called
the "Secret Chiefs" or the "Ascended Masters." HP Blavatsky referred to us as the
"Mahattmahs" who have chosen to reincarnate in order to teach the Wisest course of
action for humanity. We are ageless beings, comparable to angels, but possessing
free will, who have transcended the material realm, but who choose to return to
teach. When we speak in the spirit of the Illuminati Order, we speak only of the
Wisest course of action for humanity, otherwise, we are just ordinary people, leading
ordinary lives. The Illuminati Order, therefore, have been called by many names
throughout history, but by all these names the truth of our order has been concealed.
Like the 7 Archons, the 7 Planets and 7 chakra, the 7 colours and the 7 aeons of a
Jubilee, are the 7 levels of our order. We who have achieved to the utmost of these
can come and go at will from all these vibrational energy levels at will. So we control
our own lives, our own incarnations, etc. This is the "wavelength" we Illuminati exist
on.

3) The Illuminati are those who are "one eye'd men" within the "kingdom of the
blind." We have been awakenned from darkness into light, and have not gone back to
sleep, but have come through being blinded at first by the light. We know more than
our own best friends, more than we can even express. This is why, from time to time,
we adopt the use of masks, trickery and delusion. We seek to guide the masses only to
the extent of freeing each of them to their Sovereign Individuality. We are always
honest to all those who directly question us, and reveal as much as we know, within
the limits of other Orders' oaths we may have taken. But the IO itself does not call for
the oath of secrecy or death. We are therefore open to the public, to anyone who
would question us, whom we believe would benefit by being advanced into our 7
degrees.

These are the three points on which the Illuminati Order convene today. We seek
what Goethe cried for on his death bed: "mehr licht" (MORE LIGHT!). We define this
differently for each of us, for each of us follows its own path or ray through the
universe, guided around some points, toward or away from others, etc. No two of these
sorts of patterns are the same. Each of us in the Illuminati have achieved a soul, that
is, have become conscious of our own unique pattern, and thus come to control it. Our
choices resound throughout space and time, because we are from beyond the known
realities.

Part 1B:: IO Axiom 1B (the one eye’d king):

"In the Land of the Blind, the One Eye'd Man is King."

Such is an "Illuminati Axiom," though the meaning now may be much different from
what it would have meant at Weishaupt's time. A "king" now means the same thing as
the idea of the "everyman," because the promise of US consumerism was that
"everyman is a king." But there is only so much wealth to go around. Few kings lived
richer than many middle-class yuppies ever can. And the poor will always be poor.

However, cleverly concealed in the symbolism of Illuminism is the meaning to those,

the Illuminati, who would know how to unravel it. Thus, the "Light Within" is
"Brought Out." Here we see that the eye-in-the-pyramid motif cleverly conceals the
hidden truth: the eye is the apex of the truncated "body" or form of the pyramidon (a
pyramid without a "cap-stone"). This symbolises the mind above the body below.
Likewise, from this elevated vantage, the mind surveys the entirety of material
reality, and thus, by "co-creating" its immediate surroundings, the mind manipulates
matter using the body as an interface or relay station.

The second symbol of "True Illuminism" - which comes to us directly from Weishaupt
and not from the, sensitively infiltrated, US Masons, prior to the split between the IO
of Weishaupt into the non-Masonic 7 US degree system and the 4 degree system of
Spain - is this actual layout of the "Pyramid" schema.
In the first iteration, one person "twins" their message to two people. By the time the
original message has become distinct and been changed by the intermediary
messengers enough that a third party can learn of it without knowing or meeting
the one who began the concept then the person who originated the "meme" or
message is called a "Master" in the Illuminati. Becoming a Master means going
"three-deep."
However, there is going three steps or levels deep in society, and in a social way, and
there is going three levels deep psychologically, for each individual, as well. The
three steps of the "Pyramid" also symbolise three different roles played out by people
in crowds. One is the "wanderers," one is the "civilisers," and one is the "conquerers,"
and each expands their own way outward from their initial, three-layered
"Pyramidon." The wanderer explores aimlessly, sending out chutes like the branches
of a tree. Contrarywise, the conqueror expands along a front founded on a controlled
ratio, with only what is needed within and behind the lines. The civilisers are in
between these, revealing a strange zodiac of different patterns, as all the members
make choices within a given set of rules.

However, the Illuminati numerology is not confined to the Trinity and, as I will
demonstrate, the Trinity is viewed as an ultimate evil by many Illuminati. The symbol
of the "eye in the triangle" to an "Illuminatus" is a symbol of Ialdabaoth, the Demi-
Urge, the devil or, simply put, Satan.

Part 2:: the Illuminati Trinity:

It is possible that the three Blue Lodge degrees of Free Masonry were established as a
contrary Trinity to that of the Catholic faith. It could, equally possibly, only be a
coincidence. However, regardless of the original motives of the Masonic use of 3, the
Catholic Church has since (and for a long time now) renounced Masonry and its
concept of the Trinity. In Catholicism, the Trinity is a symbol of Unity: the three in
one and one in three of the Father, son and Holy Ghost are, so to speak, three "faces"
of one being, God. Since the Council of Nicea, these 3 have been considered
inseperable, and their meanings one and the same for each. This runs contrary to
the Masonic use of the Trinity, which establishes the 3 degrees of Blue Lodge
Masonry as a progressive sequence that can operate for each member individually.
One can become a 1st°, then stop, or progress to the 2nd° then stop, or progress to the
3rd° and stop. Beyond this are "appendent" bodies of Masonry revealing further
Masonic mysteries in additional degrees, however the first 3° of Blue Lodge are
integral to and the foundation for these other degrees as well.

It is most significant that the Catholic concept of the Trinity has long been expressed
as a triangle. The Halo of God, whenever depicted in post-Rennaissance Christian art,
has always been depicted as an equilateral triangle. The most striking examples of
use of this motif occur in modern Eastern Orthodox churches, however the fact that it
originated in the later European Dark Ages is relatively uncontested. It was never, as
I have said, prior to 1776 associated with a pyramid however. The Trinue Halo of God
as an equilateral triangle is specifically unique from the eye in the pyramid motif of
Illuminism in several specific regards.
Here is an exmaple of the triune Halo motif, from Antoniazzo Romano, late 1400's.

Here is the first use in Christian art of the "eye of providence" or eye in the triangle
from Jacoppo Carucci (called Ponormo)'s Supper at Ammaus (1525):
In the former motif, we see the equilateral triangle used as a symbol for the Trinity
as the Halo of God. This depiction is that common in such other Christian motifs as
Byzantine icons, Bulgarian churches, the Catholic church of St. Peter and in a work
now found in the Metropolitan museum. In the latter depiction, we see the standard
"eye of providence" (the so-called "all-seeing" eye), which was used to represent God
in the independent tradition of Alchemy, interpolated within the triangular Halo
design. The eye in the Pontormo painting is the right eye, the same eye used in
ancient Egyptian symbolism of the eye of Ra or Horus. The eye of providence is also
commonly used in Masonic symbolism, such as on the fold of the apron in some of the
craft degrees. In Masonic use, both the right and left eyes are used interchangeably,
and it does not appear to distinguish whether the meaning may be different between
the right and left eye used in the Masonic symbols. The 1776 eye in the pyramid of
Illuminism is a left eye. Because the Pontormo painting is the sole Christian depiction
of the eye of providence within the triangular halo of God, and it is a right eye, and
because no public Masonic works exists to dictate the specifically Masonic use of this
symbol, it can be asserted that the "right-eye" is symbolic of the "eye of providence"
within the triangular "halo of God" used in Christian art, while the "left-eye" is the
symbolic "eye of God" within the pyramidon motif used by the Illuminati.

Now, aside from the obvious difference between the base-4 pyramid and the triangle,
which I will discuss in greater detail in a moment, the most significance difference
between the "IO" and the Catholic depictions of the "eye of providence" motif is the
Illuminati interpretation of the Masonic Trinity which, as I have already said, is
distinct from the Catholic Trinity in certain, remarkable ways. The Catholic Trinity is
3-in-1 and 1-in-3 (if you can believe that). The Masonic trinity are the three degrees
of the Blue Lodge Craft degrees. Ordinarily these are depicted as three steps leading
up to the basis or foundation for the York and Scottish rite degrees. These three stair-
steps up to the "Lodge Door," figuratively speaking, are also depicted in the Illuminati
eye in the pyramid design, although not in the pyramid itself. They are depicted in
the iris of the eye of providence:
Thus, the pupil of the "eye of providence," surrounded by the 3 stair-steps in the iris,
represents itself the "Lodge Door," and, more importantly, the "mir licht" promised
beyond it to the hood-winked candidate. The iris of the Illuminati "eye of providence"
is thus the Masonic Trinity, while the pupil itself represents the dilation of the eye to
allow in the Light of Illumination. The difference between the Illuminati use of the
"eye of providence" and that by Catholic and other Christian artists is that the 3-
tiered iris of the Illuminati "eye" might be thought to signify the Masonic GAOTU
rather than the Catholic Trinity. Putting the "eye of providence" of the GAOTU in the
Trinune halo of God may be considered a blasphemy to Catholicism. This, I believe,
was the intention: by infiltrating Masonry, Weishaupt hoped to militarize the order
against Catholicism; as the Rosicrucian saying went, "the Pope is the Anti-Christ,"
and thus the GAOTU did not represent Lucifer, aside from insofar as a Good angel in
opposite to the worse, "Satanic" power-monger, the Pope.

Also, before discussing the "pyramidon" motif distinguishing the Illuminati

application of the Masonic version of the "eye of the GAOTU" to the Trinity halo motif
of Catholicism, we should pause for a moment to consider the slogans commonly
associated with the Illuminati "eye in the pyramid." Here we see the standard circular
seal folded into a "vesica pisces," or yonic eye design:

above we see the slogan "ANNUIT COEPTIS," meaning, essentially, "fortune favours"
from the old Greek saying "fortune favours the bold." However, rather than the
"bold," the slogan continues with the lowered standard, emblazoned with the slogan
"NOVUS ORDO SECLORUM," meaning, essentially, a "New Secular Order." This differs,
also, from the Catholic concept of "Temporal Power," the psychic empire of the
Church over her believers. Instead, the Illuminati slogan substitutes "Secular,"
generally interpreted as "worldly," for the "Temporal" or "Universal" power of the
Church. Remember, the IO's prime directive was, at the start, to overthrow the
governments of Europe (which answered to the Church) as well as the Church itself,
and replace it with the Rosicrucian Roger Bacon's idea of a "New Atlantis." None of
these words were chosen haphazardly; all are intended to be preserved for posterity.
To this end, the date 1776, the date of the American Declaration of Independece’s
ratification, is emblazoned in Latin (Roman) numerals across the base of the
pyramid: "MDCCLXXVI" meaning 1776, which was also the year, prior to the
ratification of the Declaration, of the founding of the Bavarian Illuminati.
On this note, let us now begin to address the Pyramidon design itself. Although it is
usually explained that the 13 steps of the Illuminati pyramid might represent the 13
original American colonies, the lowest step is actually the base, and so it's inclusion
could be called into question, particularly because the design of the Illumianti
pyramid pre-dated the adoption of the 13 stripes used on the original "Union Jack" of
the US by, if only, a few months. The original "union jack" flag flown above the
Continental Congress bore the symbol of a diamond-back rattle snake (the same used
several years prior, chopped into 8 pieces to represent the divided colonies, which
was captioned "Join or Die," indicating the severity of pre-Constitutional, colonial
Unionism). The snake of 1776 was before 13 stripes, alternating red and white, and
bore the caption "Don't Tread on Me," indicating the severity of the new Nation's
Independent sovereignty. Here is the first flag, supposedly designed by Martha
Washington, in 1777 showing the 13 stripes with 13 stars, which clearly represents
the 13 colonies unified.

In point of fact, the 12 proper steps of the pyramid stand for something more
significant to the Illuminati than even the 13 letters of "E PLURIBUS UNUM" ("out of
one, many," explaining the pyramid scheme concept itself), and even more than the
"unlucky" 13 of the Templar inquisition at the hands of the Catholic Church. The 12
steps of the pyramid, above the basis of foundation of the pyramid, can be further
thought to stand for the stair-steps of the Masonic "Fellow-Craft" tracing board.
Here we see that, above the 3 lowest steps of the "winding stair" of the FC°,
representing the 3 "Blue Lodge" degrees of Freemasonry, there are 12 steps on the
stair case, divided into two sets, the first, of 5, representing the senses and the styles
of columns, and the second, of 7, representing the schools of learning. The sequence
of 3,5,7 will play into much of the Illuminati symbolism, because these numbers are
the first odd numbers, and also the lowest prime numbers.

Most important of all is the sacred geometry used in the design of the Illuminati "eye
in the pyramid" motif, because this, even moreso than any of the rest, speaks to its
desire to appeal to the Masonic craft. Again, we find the sacred Trinity expressed,
however here we see it expressed within the symbol itself as measurements of ratios,
and not symbolically merely as the triangular shape itself. In this crudely rendered
diagram, I have attempted to show some of these sacred ratios in the Illuminati
pyramid design:
The blue line on the left signifies a measure of 1/3 the overall height from the base
or foundation. The horizontal blue line across the middle signifies 2/3 of the overall
width of the foundation, from the furthest left line to the furthest right line. This
ratio can be moved around relative to how one interprets the base length, based on
the fact that the motif itself is turned at a slight angle to express a second side of the
pyramid as well. I express much more about these sacred ratios in this model on the
page on my site:

http://www.benpadiah.com/otherstuff/dollahdollahbillsyall/GreatSeal.html

In the last place in this diagram we come to the ratio of the cap-stone to the upper
"platform" of the truncated "pyramidon," where the capstone is labeled as 2/3 the
distance from its uppermost tip to the pyramidon's "platform" in the upper-right of
the diagram.

Part 3:: the Statue of Liberty:

Lastly, I want to address another Masonic monument, often mistaken for a statue of
the "Whore of Babalon," Serapis or Semiramis. The Statue of Liberty is many things to
many people. The torch she bears aloft has been a beacon for many wayward
immigrants to the USA, however it cannot be disagreed, even among serious modern
scholars, that this torch's original meaning was not as a beacon for the "tired, the
poor and those yearning to breathe free," despite the Masonic ideals of Faith, Hope
and Charity. Nor, however, is this a symbol of the "Babylonian Brotherhood." It is
definately a massive ediface to honor the Masonic virtues, however the torch is one
of "Illuminism" (radical, anti-papal anarchism) lighting the way to the "New
Atlantean" Enlightenment, were secular humanism and the sciences have promised
to replace the empire of Rome with a new world order. In lady liberty's hand is a
tablet, upon which is written the date 1776, again in latin (Roman numerals) a a
symbol to the Catholic Church of the new states' authority:
While the "Illuminati" symbolism (the Light Above) is perhaps even more obvious
than all those aspects concealed in the Illuminati pyramid, the Masonic symbolism of
the Statue of Liberty is somewhat more obtuse. Following is a depiction of the Statue
as seen from almost directly above, with a red outline around the stellated base or
foundation upon which the statue stands:

This symbol may not be immediately familiar to the average Freemason, and that is
for a very good reason: it is not commonly known to most Masons, and is a symbol
specifically reserved to only a handful of the highest initiates of the Scottish Rite.
The symbol of the triple-triangle might still seem unfamiliar even to them, should
they miss the subtraction of the basic square shape of the foundation from the
middle. Here is the outline of the Masonic basis of the Statue of Liberty, clearly seen
as an 11 pointed shape:
This shape may take a little bit of deciphering to unravel, however it is derived from
attaching a regular square over top of the 3-triangle motif of the 33rd°. Here is the
same outline, overlapped with this symbol:

The 4 points of the square addition remain indicated, somewhat, by the alignments of
the handles and tips of the crossed sword and benediction-wand, however the other 6
points of the triple triangle design are more obvious, and inherent within the design
of this symbol. The triple triangle motif, it should also be noted, should not be
confused with the "heptagram" or 7 pointed star, which is also a symbol of the
Illuminati that has slightly infiltrated the Masonic rites proper. It was adopted,
however, directly by the OTO as the star of "BABALON," and this adoption threatens to
reduce its original Illuminati meaning to Masonic geometry until it is merely
accepted as an ineffable symbol, alike the Catholic Trinity itself.
Illuminati Symbolism 101.C::
from various sources on www.benpadiah.com
a communique for the IOBB2.

::: the double-headed phoenix symbol :::

Part 1:: alchemy:

The first true alchemist in Medieval Europe was Roger Bacon. Roger Bacon has also been attributed
with originating the search for the philosopher's stone and the elixir of life: "That medicine
which will remove all impurities and corruptibilities from the lesser metals will also, in the
opinion of the wise, take off so much of the corruptibility of the body that human life may be
prolonged for many centuries."

source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alchemy

I'd like to make more extensive reference to the history of Roger Bacon in particular,
not only as his life is, as it is, so exemplary of the life of the typical alchemist,
seeking for acceptance that could never occur, often suffering instead, and usually
ending in poverty and contempt. I'd like to mention it also as it is contemporary to
the beginning of Hapsburg lineage, which will be delved into momentarily.

Roger Bacon (c. 1214 - 1294), also known as Doctor Mirabilis (Latin: "astounding teacher"), was
one of the most famous Franciscan friars of his time. He was an English philosopher who placed
considerable emphasis on empiricism, and has been presented as one of the earliest advocates of
the modern scientific method; though later studies have emphasized his reliance on occult and
alchemical traditions. He was intimately acquainted with the philosophical and scientific
insights of the Arab world, one of the most advanced civilizations at the time.

Bacon was born near Ilchester in Somerset. His family appears to have been well-off, but, during
the stormy reign of Henry III of England, their property was despoiled and several members of the
family were driven into exile.

He later became a Franciscan friar. He probably took orders in 1253, after 10 years of study
which had left him physically and mentally exhausted.

The two great orders, Franciscans and Dominicans, were not long-established, and had begun to
take the lead in theological discussion. Alexander of Hales led the Franciscans, while the rival
order rejoiced in Albertus Magnus and Thomas Aquinas. Bacon's abilities were soon recognised,
and he enjoyed the friendship of such eminent men as Adam de Marisco and Robert Grosseteste *,
bishop of Lincoln. In the course of his teaching and research, he performed and described various
experiments.

Bacon wrote to the Cardinal Guy le Gros de Foulques, who became interested in his ideas and
asked him to produce a comprehensive treatise. Bacon, being constrained by a rule of the
Franciscan order against publishing works out of the order without special permission, initially
hesitated. The cardinal became Pope Clement IV and urged Bacon to ignore the prohibition and
write the book in secret. Bacon complied and sent his work, the Opus Majus, a treatise on the
sciences (grammar, logic, mathematics, physics, and philosophy), to the pope in 1267. It was
followed in the same year by the Opus Minus, a summary of the main thoughts from the first work.
In 1268, he sent a third work, the Opus Tertium to the pope, who died the same year, apparently
before even seeing the Opus Maius although it is known that the work reached Rome. Bacon fell out
of favor, and was in fact later imprisoned by the Franciscan order for the second time in 1278 in
Ancona as his dissemination of arab alchemy, and doubtless also his protests against the
ignorance and immorality of the clergy, roused accusations of witchcraft. He stayed imprisoned
for over ten years, until intercession of English noblemen secured his release. He died without
important epigones or pupils and was quickly forgotten for a long time.

His "Opus Majus" contains treatments of mathematics and optics, alchemy and the manufacture of
gunpowder, the positions and sizes of the celestial bodies, and anticipates later inventions such
as microscopes, telescopes, spectacles, flying machines and steam ships. Bacon studied astrology
and believed that the celestial bodies had an influence on the fate and mind of humans. He also
wrote a criticism of the Julian calendar which was then still in use. He first recognized the
visible spectrum in a glass of water, centuries before Sir Isaac Newton discovered that lenses
could disassemble and reassemble white light.

Roger Bacon is widely considered to be one of the most likely authors of the Voynich Manuscript,
given his studies in the fields of Alchemy, Astrology, and languages. Because the manuscript has
eluded all attempts at translating, this is unconfirmed, however there is overwhelming evidence to
support Bacon's authorship.

source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roger_Bacon

* (Robert Grosseteste (1170 - 1253) was a pioneer of the scientific theory that would later be used
and refined by the alchemists. He took Abelard's methods of analysis and added the use of
observations, experimentation, and conclusions in making scientific evaluations. Grosseteste also
did much work to bridge Platonic and Aristotelian thinking. (Hollister pp. 294-5))

source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alchemy

As an aside, it has come to light in the past decade that the so-called "stone of the
philosophers" was almost certainly a monoatomic form of gold, from the platinum
group of metals, which could only be produced by prolonged exposure of base gold to
near sun surface temperatures. I would further speculate this could have been
accomplished through the application of Brown's Gas.

Brown's Gas, or Hydroxy gas as it is also known, is a stoichiometric mixture of monoatomic

hydrogen and oxygen. Brown's gas is usually used for welding purposes because of its capability
of welding metals at low temperatures. Its 'cold' flame is produced by an implosion, instead of an
explosion, which means that a vacuum is created when the gas ignites.

source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brown%27s_Gas

An eagle has two young. One is fledged, but the other, which is featherless, prevents it from
flying. "Add the head of one to the other other, and you will have it," advises Maier (in Atalanta
Fugiens, 1618).

source: The Hermetic Museum: Alchemy and Mysticism. Alexander Roob, Taschen
publishing. p. 364

This is an example of the use of the eagle in symbolic Alchemy, as well as serves to be
a shiningly fine example of the flowery style of Alchemical commentators. For
Alchemists after the Renniassance, the illustrious fables using animal imagery were
a necessary deception for steeping their manuscripts in mystery in order to protect
the arcane science of their art.
For Hieronymous Reussner (Pandora, Basle, 1582), the dragon that grows from the "philosopher's
tree" is "our Mercury" or "the water of life" from which God created all things. United in it, are
the powers of the six planets and metals. The double-headed eagle of the Hapsburgs symbolises
the fixed and volatile components of matter.

source: The Hermetic Museum: Alchemy and Mysticism. Alexander Roob, Taschen
publishing. p. 416

A great deal more could and SHOULD be said than has been thus far recording the
contemporary politics of the late Medieval, Rennaissance, and early Enlightenment
as relative to the quasi-political mystic symbolism of the Alchemical manuscripts of
the same eras. I will suffice it only to say for the purpose of this exposition here that,
by the time the double-headed bird was depicted by Reussner, for example (1582), it
had already been established as a symbol indicating the Hapsburg royal family,
which had been seated as the hereditary Holy Roman Emperors from the 1270's.

Part 2:: hapsburg-romanov crests:

Part 2A:: From Counts of Habsburg to Holy Roman Emperors:

The name is derived from the Swiss Habichtsburg (Hawk Castle), the family seat in the 11th, 12th
and 13th centuries at Habsburg, Switzerland (Switzerland did not then exist in its present form,
and the Swiss lands were part of the mainly Germanic Holy Roman Empire). From South-East-
Germany the family extended its influence and holdings to the eastern reaches of the Holy Roman
Empire, roughly today's Austria (1278 - 1382). Within only two or three generations, the
Habsburgs had managed to secure an initially intermittent grasp on the imperial throne that
would last for centuries (1273 - 1291, 1298 - 1308, 1438 - 1740, and 1745 - 1806).

After the marriage of Maximilian I with Mary, heiress of Burgundy (the Low Countries) and the
marriage of his son Philipp the Handsome with Juana, heiress of Spain and its newly-founded
empire, Charles V inherited an empire where "the sun does not set".
source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hapsburg

So we see that the Hapsburg dynasty was only beginning to flourish at the same time
as the birth and bourgeoining of the Alchemical movement, as well as the Norman
rule of England, the Domesday manual and the proper formalisation of Heraldry.

Here (above left) we see the primary significant difference between the use of the
double-headed bird in the Hapsburg family crest, where it appears as the SUPPORTER.

Also depicted here (above right) is the Romanov family heraldry, the final family to
hold the title of Tsar of Russia. By the time of the beginning of the Romanov reign
(1645 under Alexis I), the double-headed bird motif was already well established by
the Hapsburgs as a symbol associative of rule by Imperial right. Since the Romanovs
operated under the auspices of the Orthodox Church (seated in Constantinople) in
much the same capacity as the HRE did relative to the Papal Catholic Church, it should
not be particularly of interest to see the motif repeated here.
Here, again, is the Hapsburg eagle, presented for the purpose of a piece of political
propaganda with text in place of the graphic elements on its shield. This should
underscore the difference aforementioned. Also, it shows the standard variation
between the motif with wings lowered and wings raised as evidence these two are
essentially synonimous and interchangeable without commentary therewith on the
inherent meaning of the motif.

Part 3:: 33rd degree:

The Trenchard prototype for the obverse of the United States seal.

The origins of the 33rd degree symbol of Scottish Rite Freemasonry are more steeped
in mystery than almost any other symbol of the moral craft. For example, the exact
type of bird illustrated therein continues to be a debate even during these early
years of the twenty-first century. Many modern Masons accept it as simply an eagle,
however many anti-Masons continue their derisive charge that the bird is actually
associated with the Alchemical phoenix, known as Azoth. As I say, there is as of yet
no standard consensus, even between the practical historians and the speculative
symbologists within the Lodge itself.

It should also be noted here that the symbol of the 33rd degree is NOT, in fact, the
symbolic heraldry of the Craft. While the eagle, or phoenix, is familiar now from a
cursory study of the crests of European noble families, the crest and arms of the
Lodge are to be held devoutly distinct from it. The actual crest and arms of Masonry
are depicted here (on the left) with the crest and arms of the Grand Lodge of England
(on the right) for comparison. I feel the symbolism of these is, contrary to that of the
double-headed bird motif, so blatantly obvious that it does not even deserve further
commentary.

Part 4:: Eagles and Shields:

Appendix 1::
list of books by and about Adam Weishaupt’s Order of the Illuminati:
a communique for the IOBB2.

Die Illuminaten, Quellen und Text zur Aufklärungsideologie des Illuminatenordens

(1776-1785)

Herausgegeben von Jan Rachold. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag, 1984.

Adam Weishaupt, An Improved System of the Illuminati, Gotha: 1787.

Adam Weishaupt (1748 - 1811), An Apology for the Illuminati, Gotha: 1787.

Knigge, Adolph, Freiherr von (1752-1796), Freimaurer- und Illuminatenschriften. Raabe

Paul [Editor] Samtliche Werke / Knigge, Adolph, Facsim. of 1781-1873 eds &
transcription of MS. München, Sau: Nendeln : KTO, 1978-92.

Nicolai, Christoph Friedrich (3/18/1733 - 1/8/1811), Versuch über die Besschuldigungen

welch dem Tempelherrnorden gemacht worden und über dessen Geheimniss; nebst einem
Anhange uber das Entstehen der Freimaurergesellschaft. [An Essay on the accusations
made against the Order of Knights Templar and their mystery; with an Appendix on the
origin of the Fraternity of Freemasons], Berlin: 1782.

Weishaupt, Adam, Die Illuminaten : Quellen und Texte zur Aufklärungsideologie des
Illuminatenordens (1776-1785) / herausgegeben von Jan Rachold. Berlin : Akademie-
Verlag, 1984. 409 p. ; 20 cm. LCCN: 85111344

Weishaupt, Adam, Die Leuchte des Diogenes oder Prüfung unserer heutigen Moralität und
Aufklärung. Regensburg: Montag ? Weiß 1804 [Ratisbon 1805] English translation:
DiogenesÕ Lamp or an Examination of our Present-Day Morality and Enlightenment.
Bloomington : The Masonic Book Club, 2008.

Weishaupt, Adam, Über die Selbsterkenntnis. Ihre Hindernisse und Vorteile. Nach dem
Original von 1794. [3. Aufl. hrsg. im Auftrage von Ordo Illuminatorum (u.a.) Zürich,
Psychosophische Gesellschaft, 1966] 200 p. 15 cm. LCCN: 67106086.

Weishaupt, Adam, Illuminatenorden. Die neuesten Arbeiten des Spartacus und Philo in
dem Illuminaten-Orden jetzt zum erstenmal gedruckt und zur Beherzigung bey
gegenwärtigen Zeitläuften herausgeben. [n.p.] 1794. 200, 90, 77 p. 20 cm. LCCN: 77465925.

Weishaupt, Adam, Ueber die Gründe und Gewisheit der menschlichen Erkenntniss; zur
Prüfung der Kantischen Critik der reinen Vernunft. Nürnberg, in der Grattenauerischen
Buchhandlung, 1788. [Bruxelles, Culture et Civilisation, 1969] 204 p. 19 cm. LCCN:
73357961.

Weishaupt, Adam, Apologie der Illuminaten ... Frankfurth und Leipzig [i.e. Nürnberg] In
der Grattenauerischen Buchhandlung, 1786. p. cm. Zweifel über die Kantischen Begriffe
von Zeit und Raum. LCCN: 09011125.

Weishaupt, Adam, Zweifel über die Kantischen Begriffe von Zeit und Raum. Nürnberg,
1788. [Bruxelles, Culture et Civilisation, 1968] 120 p. 19 cm. LCCN: 79459272.
Appendix 2::
list of websites relevant to the modern IO:
a communique for the IOBB2.

real sites for legitimate info:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illuminati
(general information)

http://www.freemasonry.bcy.ca/texts/illuminati.html
(a Masonic website covers the Masonic view of the IO)

http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/
(maintained by Terry Melanson, author of the book, Perfectibilists)

bogus sites for sham propaganda:

http://illuminati-order.com/
(Rick and Tawnie Shipley)

http://www.illuminati-news.com/
(Wes Penre)

http://www.ordeniluminati.net/english.html
(Gabriel Lopez de Rojas)

Sites for whistleblowers and theorists:

http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=126711520684741
(the IOBB3 reprints from I-O.com on facebook)

http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=54323837437
(Ciphers and Symbols of the IO by Luis Goncalves)
Our Illustrious Founder