Healthcare Unwired HRI PWC
Healthcare Unwired HRI PWC
Healthcare Unwired HRI PWC
Healthcare
unwired
New business models delivering care anywhere
Table of contents
An in-depth discussion 3
Acknowledgments 32
September 2010
The heart of the matter
Mobile technology is
untethering healthcare
and enabling the practice
of care anywhere
Mobile technologies hold great promise for keeping people healthy, managing diseases, and
lowering healthcare costs. For years, telehealth has provided clinical services for individuals
who lacked physical access: farmers in remote communities, soldiers near the battlefield,
inmates in prison. Now, these technologies have demonstrated the ability to benefit almost
any individual. Mobile devices are the most personal technology that consumers own. They
enable consumers to establish personal preferences for sharing and communicating. They
can enable health and wellness to be delivered through mass personalization.
Unfortunately, the payment wires are crossed. Providers get paid based on volume of
services delivered, and mobile health has been shown to reduce the need for hospital
admissions and physician office visits. Why would providers adopt technologies that gouge
their incomes? An industry that is paid based on volume will not adopt technologies that
reduce volume. However, new payment models enveloped in the new health reform law set
up a framework to pay providers based on outcome, not volume. In this environment, mobile
health could provide needed connections: for patients who delay care because they’re too
busy to wait in a doctor’s office; for physicians who don’t have enough time to spend with
patients; for device companies that want to monitor the performance of their devices; for
pharmaceutical companies that want to ensure patients are taking the medicines they need;
for hospitals that don’t have the capital to build more beds.
In addition, a host of new players are developing easy to use, affordable “care anywhere”
devices, services, solutions and networks that are attractive to consumers. Organizations,
that want to play a role in making “care anywhere” a reality, will need to provide real value
in order for adoption to occur.
The mobile health industry is brimming with new health applications, devices and services
that are boosting individuals’ ability to connect better to their health. Forty percent of
consumers surveyed by the Health Research Institute (HRI) said they would pay for remote
monitoring devices and a monthly service fee to send data automatically to their doctors.
HRI estimates the annual consumer market for remote/mobile monitoring devices to be $7.7
billion to $43 billion, based on the range consumers said they would be willing to pay. Real
value will need to be demonstrated in order for adoption to occur. And that value begins with
understanding two key customers: the individual and the physician. New business models will
continue to evolve, but can fit into three main categories.
HRI’s survey showed that physicians value better decision making and ease of work flow.
They’re open to mobile health but believe that lack of leadership support, privacy/security
and reimbursement could be roadblocks to adoption. Key physician survey findings that
inform the operational/clinical model were as follows:
• Mobile health can improve the use and the value of physicians’ time. One-third of
physicians surveyed by HRI said they make decisions based on incomplete information.
They believe the greatest benefit of mobile devices will be to help them make decisions
faster as they access more accurate data in real-time.
• Forty percent of physicians surveyed said they could eliminate 11% to 30% of office
visits through the use of mobile health technologies like remote monitoring, email, or
text messaging with patients. Such shifts could rewrite physician supply and shortage
forecasts for the next decade and beyond.
• Physicians are interested in different types of applications. Primary care physicians (PCPs)
are most interested in prescribing medication wirelessly, and specialists, in accessing
electronic medical records (EMRs) wirelessly.
• In-person consultations are still the main method of reimbursement, but physicians are
getting limited reimbursement for phone consultations, email consults, telehealth and text.
Payment models that address how mobile health reduces costs are more effective, but
require changes in delivery-care processes.
• Physicians agree that patient compliance • Integration. Health systems are largely
is a major obstacle and 88% would like ignoring the importance of integrating
their patients to be able to monitor their mobile health into other IT efforts, such as
health on their own. Weight and blood EMRs. Two-thirds of physicians surveyed
sugar topped the list, with vital signs not said they are using their personal devices
far behind. for mobile health solutions that aren’t
connected to their practice or hospital
IT systems.
Provider Efficiency in coordinating Good Shepherd Developed own iPhone app to help
care/physician work flow Health System physicians access patient records, track
vitals, order medication and coordinate
with care team
Provider Physician to physician Physicians from Virtual physician network for video mobile
consultation to enhance Duke, Harvard consults, starting with cardiology and
patient care and JTCC oncology. Partnership among physicians at
Duke University Medical Center, Harvard’s
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, John
Theurer Cancer Center (JTCC) and Zibbel, a
health solutions technology company.
Health insurer Finding physicians in Aetna Mobilizing “doc” finder and claims check
network or checking claims
Retail pharma Cost information and CVS Caremark iPhone app for prescription drug information
prescription management and member management of prescription
cumbersome to obtain refills, history, and retail location finder
Telecom Bandwidth and capacity Verizon 4G and more robust Wi-Fi networks to
constraints on hospital allow for increased capacity for image
networks and data transfer
Retail Access to remote Best Buy Partnership with Meridian Health to explore
monitoring devices consumer access to healthcare monitoring
devices through retail stores and determine
the opportunity to leverage existing
customer service team for installation and
technical support.
Mobile health is creating new value: less director. Kaushal added, “The two ends
expensive solutions, new ways to manage of converging solutions from the telecom
care, and better health outcomes. However, industry and the healthcare industry create
new business models are required to unlock a middleground that needs clarity and
access to technologies and players that transparency.” The impact of their decisions
support preventative, acute and chronic care. could affect the speed of innovation as well
as the investment in innovation. 3
The market for mobile Internet is booming
although healthcare solutions are still trying To date, more than 10,000 medical and
to fit in. While only about 8% of American healthcare/fitness-related applications are
adults have mobile Internet access, the available for download to smartphones
market is growing rapidly, fueled by faster and hundreds of other devices. 4 Forty
and faster connection speeds. As Figure 1 percent of consumers surveyed by HRI
shows, the market is estimated to quadruple said they would pay for remote monitoring
between 2010 and 2014, according to devices and a monthly service fee to send
PricewaterhouseCoopers’ estimates. data automatically to their doctors. HRI
estimates the annual consumer market
The next generation of technology supports for remote/mobile monitoring devices
downloads up to 7Mbps (compared to to be $7.7 billion to $43 billion, based on
the current 1.5Mbps). With the number of the range consumers said they would be
broadband households in the United States willing to pay.
projected to increase from 75.6 million
in 2009 to 113.8 million in 2014, more The new digital health environment is
information will be able to be exchanged laced with its own lexicon—mobile health
at the home. 1 (“mHealth”), digital health, telehealth,
eHealth—but the “basic phenomena is a very
To try to better connect the $2-trillion health powerful machine that is always networked
industry and its consumers, the Federal and on the person. The key difference
Communications Commission (FCC) has is on the person,” said John Glaser,
established a new healthcare taskforce former chief information officer, Partners
to focus its national broadband efforts on Healthcare. “Right now, mobile activities
connectivity through health IT solutions are concentrating on extending the range of
like e-care to improve access/utilization, existing applications.” Glaser discusses three
care coordination and ensure privacy and classes of activities: communication (e.g.,
security. 2 Its active discussions with the SMS, email), transactions (e.g., changing
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) will a flight, booking a hotel) and knowledge
determine the FCC’s role of regulating (e.g., getting directions, health information).
general purpose communication and the “You need to start from the need and build
FDA’s jurisdiction over devices used for up—mobile could be an avenue or it may
medical purposes. “While no final decisions not be. For example, a child who has asthma
have been made, the goal of our agencies and needs to track her daily capacity results
is to remove the barriers to innovation doesn’t just need a piece of technology. She
that could help open up a range of new needs support from her parents.” This points
prevention and healthcare solutions,” said out a forth class of activity—the need for
Mohit Kaushal, MD, the FCC’s healthcare integration of all aspects of a solution.
12.7
9.4
6.8
4.8
3.3
2.1
1.4
0.7
0.1
0.0
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
3 Neil Versel, “FDA, FCC discuss medical smartphone apps as industry adjusts to regulatory culture,” FierceMobileHealthcare, July 27, 2010,
accessed August 23, 2010, http://www.fiercemobilehealthcare.com/story/fda-fcc-discuss-medical-smartphone-apps-industry-adjusts-regulatory-
culture/2010-07-27.
4 “Apple iTunes App Store Metrics, Statistics, and Numbers for iPhone Apps,” last modified August 23, 2010, http://148apps.biz/app-store-
metrics/?mpage=catcount.
Clearly, mobile health offers benefits to both And while some industries have figured out
busy patients and busy physicians. Several ways to get paid for electronic transactions
research studies show that mobile health and services (e.g., music downloads),
applications reduce provider revenues healthcare has not. The third-party payer
(See Figure 2). Hospitals, physicians and system reduces the role of consumers. Public
other providers are paid primarily by volume, and private health insurers are primarily
generally referred to as a “fee-for-service” responsible for paying for healthcare, and
business model; the more you do, the they generally have not pushed for adoption.
more you are paid.
“The technology of telehealth is well ahead
Despite an explosion of wireless of the socialization of the telehealth idea and
technologies, patient visits outside of we are at a tipping point for utilization to
in-person consults remain infrequently begin taking off,” said David Jacobson, staff
reimbursed. HRI’s physician survey vice president of Business Development,
showed phone consultations for chronic State Sponsored Business at WellPoint.
disease management lead the pack while
wellness and maintenance was the least
reimbursed (See Figure 3).
5 Max E. Stachura, MD, and Elena V. Khasanshina, MD, PhD. “Telehomecare and Remote Monitoring: An Outcomes Overview.” The Advanced
Medical Technology Association, October 31, 2007, accessed July 29, 2010, http://www.advamed.org/NR/rdonlyres/2250724C-5005-45CD-A3C9-
0EC0CD3132A1/0/TelehomecarereportFNL103107.pdf.
6 “Cleveland Clinic/Microsoft Pilot Promising; Home Health Services May Benefit Chronic Disease Management.” March 1, 2010, accessed on August
25, 2010, http://my.clevelandclinic.org/media_relations/cleveland_clinic_pilot_with_microsoft_promising.aspx.
7 John G.F. Cleland, MD, Amala A. Louis, Alan S. Rigby, PhD, Uwe Janssens, MD, Aggie H.M.M. Balk, MD, and others. “Noninvasive Home
Telemonitoring for Patients with Heart Failure at High Risk of Recurrent Admission and Death,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology
45,no.10 (2005): 1654.
8 Steven C. Adamson, MD, and John W. Bachman, MD. “Pilot Study of Providing Online Care in Primary Care Setting.” Mayo Clinic Proceedings
85,no.8 (2010): 704-710, doi:10.4065/mcp.2010.0145.
88%: Yes
65%: Weight
61%: Blood sugar
57%: Vital signs (e.g., blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate)
54%: Exercise/physical activity
36%: Calories/fat content taken in
36%: Pain level
35%: Sleep patterns
28%: Cardiac rhythm
17%: Bladder control
16%: Acid reflux/indigestion
13%: Digestive health
12%: No
9 Neil Versel. “ WellPoint, Aetna, and Humana pilot remote monitoring to cut readmissions.” FierceHealthcare, July 29, 2010, accessed August 23,
2010, http://www.fiercehealthcare.com/story/wellpoint-aetna-and-humana-pilot-remote-monitoring-technology-cut-hospitalization/2010-07-29.
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
Physicians
Consumers
Currently, one-third of physicians said Yet mobile health solutions will have to
they make decisions based on incomplete ensure that they aren’t making physicians
information for nearly 70% of their patients. less productive. Physicians want to see
Specialists and PCPs find that their biggest exceptions in the data, not all the data.
obstacle when seeing patients or running Too much information could actually
their practice is accessing information when slow care down. Hospitals can help the
and where they need it (See Figure 6). Only physicians who bring in patients by filtering
half of physicians surveyed access EMRs the data they send electronically. “For
while visiting and treating their patients. example, a physician who has seen patients
“Meaningful use” requirements, which go with chest pain that have inconsistent
into effect in 2011 and require interoperable outcomes, can query for every patient over
use of EMRs, are expected to improve timely the age of 55 who came in with chest pain
access to information. and was given aspirin. This potentially allows
27%
18%
Increasing face-to-face time with patients
24%
16%
Increasing patient compliance
7%
12%
Decreasing communication between physicians
8%
5%
Obtaining easier communication channels to patients
5%
5%
Other
hospitals to improve outcomes or work flows their days on mobile devices. He added that
based on the data,” said Johnny Milaychev, experienced nurses can post order requests
product manager of New Wave Software, a on physicians’ phones and they can sign
veteran clinical integration vendor. or modify them wherever they are. Both
specialists and PCPs have a high degree of
Another example is e-prescribing wherein interest in e-prescribing (See Figure 7).
physicians’ most common orders are
automatically populated on their devices, Having information at their fingertips ensures
said Donald Burt, MD, chief medical officer physicians that their time is used more
of PatientKeeper, a physician information effectively. Of physicians who are using
technology firm. He said PatientKeeper’s mobile devices in their practices, 56%
25,000 daily physician users spend 20% of said the devices expedite their decision-
making and nearly 40% said they decrease Willingness to pay out-of-pocket continues to
administrative time (See Figure 8). Mount be a main barrier to mobile health adoption.
Sinai Hospital in Ontario, Canada connected Less than half of both Medicaid and Medicare
its physicians to EMRs through their iPhones. patients would be willing to pay out-of-pocket
Its VitalHub program has changed the way its for electronic doctor visits. Consumers want
physicians work; they pull up patient charts, low-cost solutions and those in very good
labs, medical references and radiology health are the most likely to track metrics on
images. “Chart applications from leading a mobile device application, creating more
vendors may have a robust backend, but challenges in reaching the highest users of
the physician experience is weak. They are the healthcare system—those in poor health
struggling with making the chart something with chronic diseases.
easy to deal with. How do we help our
56%
Expedite decision
making
39%
36%
Decrease time it
takes for Increase
administrative collaboration 26%
tasks among 24%
physicians Allow more time
with patients Have not affected
my day-to-day
work
Delayed care
> 5 times in the
11%
6% past year
4%
2%
Michael Mathias, Aetna’s chief technology would prefer to pay less than $10 for the
officer. “The days of mass communication monthly mobile phone service and less than
are over. We can now deliver customized $75 for the device.
communications through mobile apps, online,
telephonically, or through the mail based Mike Weckesser, director of emerging
on our understanding of how each member business-health solutions at Best Buy,
wants to be communicated with.” points out the challenges of consumer
price expectations related to mobile health
technology. “In our consumer research,
Targeting the mobile health consumers although consumers identified a price
Only half of consumers surveyed by HRI said threshold, they also expected the payer to
they would buy mobile technology for their reimburse them for those purchases, thereby
health, so it’s important to know who these slanting the data.”
consumers are. Of those, 20% say they
would use it to monitor fitness/wellbeing Though many consumers have never
and 18% want their doctors to monitor their taken advantage of existing mobile health
health conditions (See Figure 10). While 40% technologies, 85% of those that have
of respondents would be willing to pay for a communicated with their doctor by means
monthly mobile phone service or device that other than face-to-face were satisfied with
could send information to their doctor, they their discussion.
Physicians in New Jersey thought there must dispenser that monitors adherence. Based
be a better way to ease the pain of cancer on the doctors’ preferences, they can be
patients. After collaborative conversations alerted to fluctuations or outliers in reporting.
with the leadership of Meridian Health “This may actually allow the physician to
System, the idea for an innovative pain increase the billing fee from a level three and
journal was born. The journal’s intent was to four to a level four and five,” said Sandra
allow patients to record and communicate Elliott, Meridian Health’s director of consumer
their pain while resting at home. With more technology and service development.
accurate communication, physicians could
better understand the pain medication Including Best Buy in the collaboration was
needs of their patients. a key strategy. “We have learned that we,
as a health system, don’t truly understand
The health system didn’t think insurers would the retail marketplace,” added Elliott. “Best
pay for such a device, but maybe patients Buy does and people go to them for their
might—if it was affordable. With this as a technology. The wireless networks are going
business model, an unusual but powerful to be a major part of getting technology in the
collaboration came together: hands of consumers, and we wanted to be
able to leverage Best Buy’s retail knowledge
• Clinical expertise: Meridian Health, a as well as their Geek Squad for installation.
five-hospital health system in New Jersey As a health system, our job is to take care of
(a teaching hospital, children’s hospital, people. We need to come up with strategies
home health and rehab centers). Most of to get service fees and technology prices
the health system’s 1,600 physicians are in down. Our challenge is to think about how
private practice, with half in primary care to manage an increasing patient population
and 100 physicians on staff. without building new buildings.”
10 Near field communication is short-range wireless interaction among devices and PCs.
Joseph Kvedar, MD, director of the Center for Connected Health at Partners
HealthCare in Boston emphasized that while “sensor technology may rapidly
be becoming commoditized, integration with EMR and data aggregation
systems is not something we have seen done well. We need to get better at
gathering information, adding logistical software to get to the intersection of
all the data and population health management.”
weight and vital signs (e.g., blood employees was a motivator for the 2,500
pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate). participants, who lost 2.6% of weight
Where they differ is that consumers over 10 weeks. “Mobile is the technology
rank calories/fat taken in as the third of choice for team-based programs with
metric they would most like to track, or without an incentive. The real-time
and physicians ranked blood sugar ahead information allows us to build profiles of
of vital signs. Eric Topol, director of the employee information instead of getting
Scripps Translational Science Institute only point information,” said Wolfsen.
and vice chairman of the West Wireless
Health Institute, cautioned that, “patients • Certain chronic-illness groups of
may not understand the importance of patients. Those with chronic diseases did
glucose monitoring. Many patients need say, however, that better access to their
to be trained as to what causes large health information and regular feedback
swings in blood sugar and when they are from their doctors would make them
over and undershooting. Physicians know feel more in control of their own health.
11 Jane Sarasohn-Kahn, M.A., M.H.S.A. “How Smartphones Are Changing Health Care for Consumers and Providers.” California Healthcare
Foundation, April 2010, accessed August 23, 2010, http://www.chcf.org/~/media/Files/PDF/H/HowSmartphonesChangingHealthCare.pdf.
How do we help our clinicians that are going to multiple places for locating
information? We go to them.
—Teek Dwivedi
they did not know if they were prepared information through several interfaces.
to assist them with medical device “Qualcomm’s platform has the capability
interoperability. Such interoperability to link the body area network devices
will be required in the later stages of like a smart Band-Aid to personal
achieving meaningful use compliance. area networks like wifi to wide area
Physicians and consumers see mutual value in mobile health. And those intersections lead
to opportunity. For example, physicians are interested in remote monitoring and consumers
are willing to pay for it. Figure 13 depicts additional consumer and physician attitudes
toward mobile health.
40% said they Paying for mobile health 57% said they want to
would pay for remote monitor patients outside
monitoring device with
There is a consumer market for remote the hospital
a monthly service fee
monitoring devices that send data to the
healthcare professional.
What this means for your business PricewaterhouseCoopers’ Health Research Institute 29
Where you are and how to start
Whether you’re thinking about mobile health, 5. Value proposition: Create the value
planning for mobile health or leading mobile proposition that identifies, quantifies
health, defining and understanding the and measures the cost, convenience,
customer(s) will enable you to determine confidence and compensation from
the most appropriate business model. outcome improvements from the
Each model may target one or more of mobile solution
the following goals: providing a better
transaction, giving more knowledge, easing 6. Platform: Identify an existing platform or
communication and/or integrating solutions the need to create a new platform upon
and information (See Figure 14). Consider which the new mobile solution should be
these steps when identifying and executing launched and the partners required for
on the mobile health opportunity: the platform components
1. Customer: Identify the specific market 7. Business model: Create the business
segment for mobile applications model that delivers the value proposition
(consumer, employer, provider, pharma, by leveraging existing or creating new
device, payers, etc.) payment options
2. Pain points: Identify the current failure 8. Develop and launch: Develop and
and pain points that mobile solutions launch the mobile offering for the target
can more effectively address for the market through pilots and then full
target market launch based upon realizing metrics
and milestones of successful adoption
3. Work flow: Identify how the current
processes, practices and work flow 9. Data mining: Mine real-time data and
would change by the application information to create increasing value
of mobile solutions to provide a for all stakeholders
better outcome
10. Scale: Expand the platform and
4. Vision: Create a vivid visualization of business model to address the larger
the mobile solution and the and adjacent markets
characteristics of the offering that
would create greater value
Business models
Operational/clinical
Focuses on internal operations of an
organization—running and growing
the business (e.g., financial, clinical
performance, customer experience).
Goal: Transaction
Consumer products and services Enable the exchange or
Services related to individuals that span across query of information to
health/fitness, preventative care, acute care accomplish discrete tasks
and chronic care (e.g., apps, fitness devices
and games, personal sensors/monitoring).
Infrastructure
Focuses on securing, connecting
and speeding up health-related
information exchange (e.g.,
platforms, software, bandwidth).
Customers
Consumer
Physician
Health system
Health insurer
Employer
Pharma/device Goal: Knowledge
Provide new information
for decision-making
Goal: Integration
Unify services, products
and/players to form a
whole solution Goal: Communication
Enable dialogue or
information dissemination
What this means for your business PricewaterhouseCoopers’ Health Research Institute 31
Acknowledgments
Mark Moffitt
Former Chief Information Officer
Good Shepherd Medical Center
Kelly Barnes
Partner, Health Industries Leader
214.754.5172
kelly.a.barnes@us.pwc.com
Christopher Wasden
Managing Director
646.471.6090
christopher.wasden@us.pwc.com
Dan Garrett
Partner, Healthcare IT Practice Leader
610.256.2055
daniel.garrett@us.pwc.com
William Molloie
Partner
619.744.8116
w.molloie@us.pwc.com
© 2010 PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. All rights reserved. “PricewaterhouseCoopers” refers to PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership, or, as the context
requires, the PricewaterhouseCoopers global network or other member firms of the network, each of which is a separate and independent legal entity. This document is for general
information purposes only, and should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional advisors. BS-11-0026