Chemical Chart: How To Biblically and Scientifically Avoid The Pig!
Chemical Chart: How To Biblically and Scientifically Avoid The Pig!
Chemical Chart: How To Biblically and Scientifically Avoid The Pig!
Isaiah 66:17 “Those who sanctify and purify themselves to go into the gardens, following one in the midst, eating pig's
flesh and the abomination and mice, shall come to an end together, declares the Lord.”
Peace Family! I know as young Five Percenters we are sometimes asked questions by our
parents, family members, and friends, about why we don't eat certain foods, especially PORK!! Bacon,
baby back ribs, sausages, and the like. Some people really don't understand our ways. Well the reason
they don't understand us is because they have been mis-educated as to the laws of the Bible, the Old
Testament as well as the New Testament in regards to the dangers of eating pork. They may claim that
“only Jews and Muslims don't eat it, but Jesus made it clean.” Not True! As a matter of fact you can
ask them this question “Did Jesus Eat Pork?” Of course he didn't because he followed the dietary law
of Musa (Moses). Now if Christian means to be “Christ-like” and Jesus never ate pork, also Christians
are supposed to look to Jesus' life as the prime example of how to live, then why would they then turn
around and eat something which Jesus himself never ate because he followed the Mosaic Law out to a
tee.
At Matthew 5:17 Jesus said “Think NOT that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I
am NOT COME TO DESTROY, but to fulfill.”
ful·fill means:
So if Jesus in his own words according to the Bible says that he came NOT to destroy, but to
fulfil the law then that means that he came to measure up to, to complete, or carry out, or bring into
actuality.
Mark 7:18-19 has been used by many to supposedly justify eating unclean meats.
“Then Jesus said,
...Do ye not perceive, that whatsoever thing from without entereth into the man, it cannot
defile him; Because it entereth not into his heart, but into the belly, and goeth out into the
draught, purging all meats?”
Some bible-versions add words to verse 19, such as ("this he said, making all meats clean.")
ALWAYS IN PARENTHESES OR BRACKETS, whenever you see parentheses or brackets in a quote,
that means that someone else is adding their own words and personal interpretation to the quote.
JESUS NEVER SAID HE MADE ALL MEATS CLEAN! THIS IS A CLEAR ADDITION TO THE
SCRIPTURE BY THE TRANSLATOR IN ORDER TO JUSTIFY THE PRACTICE OF EATING
PORK!
The Greek text of that passage, the oldest known version, does not contain the words "this he
said". The Greek text says, basically translated, "But it does not enter the heart but the stomach, and
then it goes out into the waste, purging all that was eaten". In a nutshell: Jesus was NOT talking
about "making foods clean", but that "impure things" come out, afterwards.
The proper context of this begins at Mark 7:1-5, which describe the Pharisees’ practice of
always washing their hands up to their elbows before eating, and other traditions of washing pots and
cups. THE ISSUE HERE AT MARK CHAPTER 7, IS NOT EVEN CLEAN AND UNCLEAN MEATS,
BUT THE TRADITION OF CEREMONIAL HANDWASHING . Jesus showed and proved that unclean
thoughts are the things that most defile a man, not just ceremonially unwashed HANDS in verses 20-
23. The parallel passage to Mark CHAPTER 7 is Matthew CHAPTER 15. After explaining that
defilement of the mind is far worse than defilement of the body, Jesus ends with, "These are the things
which defile a man [evil thoughts, adulteries, etc. described in Matthew 15:18-19]:but to eat with
unwashen HANDS defileth NOT a man," in verse 20. So we can see here that at Mark chapter 7 Jesus'
issue was NOT the eating of unclean food, but the issue of whether ritualistically washed hands made
one defiled. Now I don't think that Jesus wanted people to be dirty, the people who were accusing him
were referring to a particular traditional style of washing, NOT APART OF THE MOSAIC LAW, to
put on airs as if they were clean when in fact they were unclean (mentally) in their ways, and actions.
The Pharisees constantly watched Jesus every move. He abided by the Mosaic Law (the law of Musa).
They were constantly falsely accusing him of some sort of minor infraction of one of their (Pharisee)
traditions, But never did any Jew accuse Jesus of eating, or ADVOCATING THE EATING OF,
UNCLEAN MEATS, even when they brung charges before Pontius Pilate the eating of unclean foods
WAS NOT on that list. Jesus said he did not come to destroy the Law but to fulfil and keep it, therefore
we can conclude that NO! Jesus did not eat pork!
Isaiah 66:17 “Those who sanctify and purify themselves to go into the gardens, following one in the midst, eating pig's flesh
and the abomination and mice, shall come to an end together, declares the Lord.”
Peace Family, this month we will do more research to show and prove that according to the
Bible Jesus never ate Pork and did not advise his followers to eat it. First we have to deal with
the fact that according to the Bible there is a Restrictive Dietary Law, meaning a law of Diet, or
food you eat, these laws are in the Bible at Leviticus chapter 11 and Deuteronomy chapter
14 (please read these laws).
Jesus, during his ministry, gave a parable condemning the Pharisees (The Religious Leaders of
his time) who literally strained out a little gnat (unclean insect), but figuratively swallowed a
huge camel (another unclean animal) at Matthew 23:24 which shows and proves that Jesus
acknowledged the dietary law. This parable makes no sense at all if Jesus came to destroy the
law of clean and unclean animals for food.
Jesus at Matthew 13:47-50 compares unclean fish to evil people who are cast into Hell:
47Again, the kingdom of heaven is like unto a net, that was cast into the sea, and gathered of every kind:
48Which, when it was full, they drew to shore, and sat down, and gathered the good into vessels, but cast the
bad away.
49So shall it be at the end of the world: the angels shall come forth, and sever the wicked from among the
just,
50And shall cast them into the furnace of fire: there shall be wailing and gnashing of teeth.
This parable makes no sense to those who do not understand the difference the LAW places
between the clean and the unclean animals.
In Mark 5:1-17, Jesus cast out a Legion of demons from a man who was possessed. The
demons begged Jesus to let them go into a herd of nearby swine. So, he allowed it, and the herd
of pigs ran violently down a steep place and drowned in the Sea. Jesus knew what the demons
would do to the swine, again showing that he supported the Law of Clean and Unclean.
But if these laws are so logical and beneficial to mankind, where did the idea come from that
they have been destroyed? Why are “Bible-believing Christians” at the forefront of promoting
this blatantly FALSE notion? Misleading interpretations that are read into scripture as found in
Acts 10. Studying the "evidence" is instructive.
In Acts 10, Peter has a vision to help him understand the future plans for the growth of the
early community of Jesus' followers. He envisioned unclean animals and was told three times
to eat. Each time he emphatically refused because he believed it was wrong, this is why Peter
three times stated "Not so, Lord! For I have never eaten anything common or unclean (Acts
10:14). Then in (Acts 10:15) God says "What God hath cleansed, that call not thou common".
Such a statement "proves that the dietary law was still in effect after the death of Jesus" at
least for Peter's standards because he is unsure if this is seen as a command by God. (Acts
10:13–16). Now this is the same Peter who supposedly heard Jesus abolish the dietary laws
earlier in Mark 7 (notice Acts 10:2) and was taught by Jesus personally for three-and-one-half
years, b.u.t. he was still under the clear impression that eating unclean meats was wrong! Peter
was really frustrated over the meaning of the vision. (NOW IF JESUS HAD MADE ALL
MEATS CLEAN AT MARK CHAPTER 7 THEN WHY WOULD PETER EVEN BE
STRESSING OVER THIS DREAM?
Acts 10:17-28
17Now while Peter doubted in himself what this vision which he had seen should mean, behold, the men which
were sent from Cornelius had made enquiry for Simon's house, and stood before the gate,
18And called, and asked whether Simon, which was surnamed Peter, were lodged there.
19While Peter thought on the vision, the Spirit said unto him, Behold, three men seek thee.
20Arise therefore, and get thee down, and go with them, doubting nothing: for I have sent them.
21Then Peter went down to the men which were sent unto him from Cornelius; and said, Behold, I am he whom
ye seek: what is the cause wherefore ye are come?
22And they said, Cornelius the centurion, a just man, and one that feareth God, and of good report among all
the nation of the Jews, was warned from God by an holy angel to send for thee into his house, and to hear words
of thee.
23Then called he them in, and lodged them. And on the morrow Peter went away with them, and certain
brethren from Joppa accompanied him.
24And the morrow after they entered into Caesarea. And Cornelius waited for them, and he had called together
his kinsmen and near friends.
25And as Peter was coming in, Cornelius met him, and fell down at his feet, and worshipped him.
26But Peter took him up, saying, Stand up; I myself also am a man.
27And as he talked with him, he went in, and found many that were come together.
28And he said unto them, Ye know how that it is an unlawful thing for a man that is a Jew to keep company,
or come unto one of another nation; but God hath shewed me that I should not call any man common or
unclean.
Peter stressed over this dream until three Gentile men came knocking at his door with a request
to hear the Gospel explained (21–27). Under normal circumstances Peter would not have
associated with these men who were outside of the covenant community, because the Hebrews
considered the Gentiles (Europeans) to be "unclean," the same as pork, so when these three
Gentiles (Europeans) approached him the reality of the Understanding of the dream made itself
Born unto Peter:
Acts 10:28
28And he said unto them, Ye know how that it is an unlawful thing for a man that is a Jew to keep company,
or come unto one of another nation; but God hath shewed me that I should not call any man common or
unclean.
Peter does not conclude in this chapter, or anywhere else in the New Testament, that the dietary
laws were to be abolished. The so-called evidence is simply not there! Neither Jesus nor Peter
abandoned these guidelines.
The evidence for Jesus and the Apostles abolishing the dietary laws is weak. The Bible
does not advocate this. So where did this come from? [The clues are to be found in the social,
political and religious factors that influenced church doctrines of the second century ad (cf. Dr.
Samuele Bacchiocchi, From Sabbath to Sunday, 1977, chap. 2).]
According to Dr. Samuele Bacchiocchi, author of the books “From Sabbath to Sunday, and
Durant, Caesar, and Christ,” As more Gentiles (Europeans) came into the community of Jesus'
early followers they had to deal with the strong anti-Hebrew sentiment of Latin and Greek
authors of the time. Evidently the embarrassment of adhering to the Asiatic customs of the
followers of Jesus was too much for the newly converted Gentiles, and they basically severed
their ties from Hebrew influence, and declared themselves distinct and separate from anything
Hebrew. In their attempt to formulate a Gentile (European) non-Hebrew version of Jesus'
teaching they replaced the Saturday Sabbath with Sunday, the Passover with Easter, and
abolished the Dietary Laws. Early Gentile Christian writers stretched their dubious Biblical
interpretations paper thin, like Mark chapter 7 and Acts chapter 10, in order to establish a
“Bible base” for their new practices, never seen before in Jerusalem among the Original
Hebrew Followers of Jesus.
I advise all who read this to research this for yourself and come to your own conclusion. DO
NOT BELIEVE ME!!!!!!!!!!LOOK IT UP FOR YOURSELF!!!
PEACE
Did Jesus Eat Pork? Part 3
Leviticus 11:7-8 “And the pig, because it parts the hoof and is cloven-footed but does not chew the cud, is unclean to you.
You shall not eat any of their flesh, and you shall not touch their carcasses; they are unclean to you. “
Isaiah 66:17 “Those who sanctify and purify themselves to go into the gardens, following one in the midst, eating pig's flesh
and the abomination and mice, shall come to an end together, declares the Lord.”
This month we will continue exploring our topic although this time we will be examining the dietary practices of the
Apostles and early disciples of Jesus after he returned to the Essence. As we have seen, no scriptural evidence exists
that indicates that Jesus' early followers ever changed their practice of following the restrictive dietary law. Instead,
we see the plain words of one of Jesus' apostles saying, about a decade after Jesus' death, that he had “never eaten
anything common or unclean.” (Act 10:14)
While reading the New Testament, we find that there was indeed a controversy involving food. However, if we take a
closer look at the Bible it reveals the issue to be very different from what many have been led to believe by false
teachers. At 1 Corinthians chapter 8 Jesus' disciple Paul discussed “the eating of things offered to idols” (verse 4).
Why was this an issue? “ In Paul's time, meat was sacrificed to pagan gods, by the Romans and other pagans in the
immediate area, later this meat was sold in the public markets. Some of the followers of Jesus wondered if it was right
for them to eat meat that had been sacrificed to pagan gods” (Nelson’s New Illustrated Bible Dictionary, 1995,
“Meat”). It is interesting, though, to note that in Acts 14:13, the only passage in which the type of animal sacrificed to
idols is mentioned, was oxen, clean animals. This controversy was not over the kinds of meat that should be eaten.
Obedient Hebrews of the day, did not consider unclean meat, swine and the like, to even be a possible source of food.
Instead, the controversy dealt with the conscience of each follower of Jesus when it came to eating meat, clean meat,
that might have been sacrificed to idols. Paul explained that “an idol is nothing” (1 Corinthians 8:4), basically stating
that it does not matter if meat had been sacrificed to an idol, the meat was still suitable for food. Paul continued:
“However, there is not in everyone that knowledge; for some, with consciousness of the idol, until now eat it as a
thing offered to an idol; and their conscience, being weak, is defiled. But food does not commend us to God; for
neither if we eat are we the better, nor if we do not eat are we the worse” (verses 7-8). So it did not matter if one
bought it at a market or ate it at someones home, (1 Corinthians 10:25-27). His main concern was that one did not
stumble another whose understanding was weak, concerning sacrificed meats (1 Corinthians 8:13; 10:28). The
question of meat sacrificed to idols was a great controversy in first century. It is the foundation of many of Paul’s
discussions of conscience. Unlike the Dietary Law of clean and unclean animals, which was recorded in the Old
Testament, the Hebrew Scriptures are vague concerning the matter of food offered to idols. But, in the first-century
world, bringing this issue to light was paramount.
Some False teachers may claim that Paul’s statement at Romans 14:14
“I know and am convinced by the Lord Jesus that there is nothing unclean of itself” meant that Jesus' early followers
made no distinction between clean and unclean meats. Although Jesus and his original 12 Apostles spoke Aramaic the
New Testament of the Bible was written in the Greek Language. So the understanding of a few Greek words will help
us solve this.
KOINOS AND KOINOO
The New Testament writers referred to two concepts of unclean, using different Greek words to show and prove the
two ideas. Unclean could refer to unclean animals not intended to be used as food such as the animals listed in
Leviticus 11 and Deuteronomy 14. Unclean could also mean ceremonial uncleanness. In Romans 14 Paul uses
koinos, which translates as “common” (W.E. Vine, Vine’s Complete Expository Dictionary of Old and New Testament
Words, 1985, “Unclean,” p. 649). Along with the meanings of “common” and “ordinary,” the word also means things
considered polluted or defiled. This word, along with its verb form koinoo, is used at Mark 7:2, 15-23, where it refers
to ceremonial uncleanness in the incident when the disciples ate without having first washed their hands. (God Speaks
Newsletter Feb 48) . Using a Bible concordance you can verify that koinos and koinoo exist throughout the New
Testament to mean this kind of ceremonial uncleanness. Basically something could be considered ceremonially
unclean, (defiled) even though it was otherwise considered a clean meat, like for instance, dropping some Kosher
meat on the ground could defile it, making it ceremonially unclean.
An entirely different word, akathartos, is used in the New Testament for animals specified as unclean. In the
Septuagint (the Greek translation of the Old Testament in wide use in Paul’s day), akathartos is used to specify the
unclean meats listed in Leviticus 11 and Deuteronomy 14. Most Bible translations distinguish between the meanings
of the words koinos and akathartos. When Paul said in Romans 14:14 that “there is nothing unclean [koinos, or
‘common’] of itself,” he was making the same point he had made in the book of 1 Corinthians that just because meat,
that was otherwise allowable under the dietary law to eat, may have been associated with idol worship, does not mean
it is intrinsically unfit for human consumption. If a person is as familiar with the New Testament as these False
Teachers that advocate that eating pork is sanctioned by the Bible claim to be, they should know from the context of
the scriptures that Paul wasn’t talking about the biblical dietary restrictions at all. Paul states at Romans 14:20 that
“all food is clean.” The word translated “clean” is katharos, “free from impure admixture, without blemish, spotless.
The sense of these verses is basically that “nothing [is] unclean [koinos: common or ceremonially defiled] of itself,”
and “all is clean [katharos: free from impure admixture, without blemish, spotless].” Paul’s point is that the chance
that meat could have possibly been sacrificed to idols did not defile the meat, not that pork is clean.
The book of Revelation, THE VERY LAST BOOK OF THE NEW TESTAMENT, in describing the last days and
times leading up to the return of the Christ, uses the expression “a haunt for every unclean and hated bird!”
(Revelation 18:2). If the Restrictive Dietary Law from Moses in the Old Testament was expired, then why was the
designation of “UNCLEAN” animal (bird) made manifest to John the Revelator in the last book of the Bible
Revelations, which only speak about the last days and times? (Matthew 5:17-19). Revelation 18:2 may refer to
“unclean spirits” (people with unclean mentalities) in the New Testament. Even so, this metaphor would make no
sense if there were not a distinction between actual clean and unclean birds. Unclean spirits (devilish mentalities) are
also compared to frogs, another unclean animal, in Revelation 16:13. Another scripture that refers to the end of days
presents this picture: “For behold, the Lord will come with fire and with His chariots, … the Lord will judge all flesh;
and the slain of the Lord shall be many. ‘Those who sanctify themselves and purify themselves, to go to the gardens
after an idol in the midst, eating swine’s flesh and the abomination and the mouse, shall be consumed together,’ says
the Lord” (Isaiah 66:15-17). Here we see that, eating unclean things is condemned. The Bible, Old Testament, as well
as the New Testament is crystal clear. Distinctions between clean and unclean meats existed long before the New
Testament was written; they were followed by Jesus himself, his Apostles, as well as the other early disciples; and
they still apply now in the time of the presence of GOD Himself. The Restrictive Dietary Law is still being kept by the
Righteous which “keeps the commandments of God and has the testimony of Jesus Christ” (Revelation 12:17). As
always I ask that you the reader do your due diligence and research this for yourself!
Vegetables We Do Eat
Small Navy Beans
Small Pink Navy Beans
String Beans June Beans
White Cabbage Cauliflower
Egg Plant Okra
Asparagus Whole Wheat Bread
Carrots Broccoli
Turnip (white) Spinach
Tomatoes Celery
Lettuce Radish
Fresh Corn White Potatoes
Meats We Do Eat
Of course no meat is good for us but if we are going to eat meat the best is
Lamb Beef
Squabs Chicken
(young pigeons) (We eat chickens, but they are not good for us)
Fish We Do Eat
Pike Trout
Bass Perch
Salmon White Fish
Allah, The Father: Feed them the right foods. Don't teach religion.
Allah, The Father: Well Mayor Wagner don't think so...I mean Mayor Lindsay don't think so. He said that the
churches and the organizations have lost it! That they cannot control the children! Now, where do they keep them
at? That's why Mayor Lindsay is the greatest mayor that ever been. He tells the truth. He's a great mayor. He gets out
with the people. Now he got a TV show so he make communication. Now he's going out there in California. Mayor
talking about "I got to meet Barry tonight" to get off the telephone to make a special call to something else. Mayor
Lindsay the greatest mayor who ever lived.
Allah, The Father: No, everything else isn't all right. Don't eat no shrimp. Don't eat no crabs. Don't eat none of that
food.
Interviewer: Crabs?
Allah, The Father: Yes. There's other seafood. Don't eat no buffalo fish because it doesn't have no scales. Anything
bite it, the poison go right into it. If the fish has a scale, you bite it; the poison doesn't effect it because of the
texture. Don't eat the old, eat the young. Because you shouldn't eat meat at all period because you're taking on
animal protein so you still spoil the human being system. If you are going to eat meat eat the best. Not only is it good
for you, it's good for me too.
Allah, The Father: Beef. Lamb. Fish. Don't eat buffalo fish because it has no protection. Something bite it, the poison
go right into the fish. If you bite a fish with a scale, does the poison go into it? Don't eat tuna over 150 pounds but
most tuna come over 150 pounds.
Allah, The Father: I'm telling you how it comes because civilized people know.
Allah, The Father: There are many kinds. Don't eat butter beans. Don't eat collard greens because it belongs to the
weed family. Eat the white cauliflower because it melts in your mouth. The spinach you eat that. The broccoli you eat
that. Cauliflower you eat that. There are certain foods you have to eat. You've got to save your own what? Self! No
medication can save you.
Allah, The Father: Well that's their business. That's their business. Don't worry about them. Don't you eat it. That's
why many women not built up. They eat the wrong what? Food and can't hold a baby. Can't hold it. So don't worry
about the other people. All you do is tell them. Save yourself. Live as long as you can. Now when I do stop eating
meat I know I have to stop drinking wine. See?
Allah, The Father: Because the liquor will have nothing to eat on. It will eat me up. There are many things you got to
understand. This is why President Johnson got an operation on his hand. You know? And it won't heal. And when
they sewed it up it wouldn't stay together. Why? Because it's decayed. You know what I mean by decay? It won't stay
what? Together. It's not solid. It's decayed. Because when you sew it together, you find some people they sew it
together. They have a bad break in and it open, the thread keep pulling apart as it tighten up it come right on what?
Through. It won't close up. Why? It's decayed.
Why you think people get old? Do you think when you get old you call it a blessing? Do you call it a blessing when
you get old? Huh? That's no blessing! That's long suffering!
Allah, The Father: Do they? I'm not going no more further! I'm 39 years old meaning understanding born. I'm not
going no further. If I do want to go further then I know how to kill myself by taking on the wrong what? Foods! Doing
the wrong what? Things! That's how you get old.
Allah, The Father: Because I know what it do for me. I know what it do for me.
Allah, The Father: Not mine. Because I'm going to tell the truth. I'm not going to talk about no one. I'm just going to
tell you what they do and you can't bring an accusation against me. I'm only telling you what they did because I'm
studying them. And all things were put forth before I became involved myself into the knowledge of self and let them
know. I can tell them all about them but they can't tell me nothing about me because I'm a new breed that they
don't know about. Now what they're going to tell about me when I can tell them all about themselves?
STOP CRYING
UNITE
AND
START
DOING
FOR SELF!
FREEDOM &
INDEPENDENCE
BEGINS WITH THE
OWNERSHIP OF
LAND!
WE MUST
HAVE
SOME OF THIS
EARTH TO
CALL OUR
OWN!
CHEMICAL CHART LAST UPDATED 2011
BAKING GOODS, CONDIMENTS, SAUCES, SEASONINGS AND SWEETENERS
Dominick's Frozen Pie Shells (Reg. & Deep Dish) Non-Pork Clean
Refrigerated Pie Shells Lard - Pork Unclean
Safeway Select Frozen Pie Shells (Reg. & Deep Dish) Non-Pork Clean
Refrigerated Pie Shells Pork Unclean
BEVERAGE
Vegetable Color/Red
Ocean Spray Juice Ruby Red (All Varieties) Clean
#40
White Cranberry Peach Canthaxanthin Unclean
All Other Drinks Non-Animal Clean
Chicago Baking
Butternut Vegetable Clean
Company
Sunbeam Vegetable Clean
Roman Meal Vegetable Clean
Cole Bread Frozen bread loaves (All Varieties) Enzymes, pork Unclean
George Weston
Thomas' Sahara Pita Breads Non-Pork Clean
Bakeries
Quaker Oats Company Aunt Jemima Pancake & Waffle Mix Non-Animal Clean
B.C. Bundt Co. Banana Nut, Lemon, & Vanilla Cakes, Non-Pork Clean
Pineapple Orange, & Strawberry Cakes, Non-Pork Clean
Louisiana Crunch, & Sock-it-to-Me
Non-Pork Clean
Cakes
Bishops (Aldi Stores) Bakers Treat Peanut Butter Waffers Vegetable Clean
Heaven Scent Animial Free - Cookies & Rice Bars Non-Pork Clean
Mrs. Smith Bakeries Baker's Treat Pecan Sweet Rolls Non-Animal Clean
Amurol
Everest Gum Glycerin, Synthetic Clean
Confectionery Co.
Bubble Tape Gum Glycerin, Synthetic Clean
Atkinson's Candy
Assorted Sours (Hard Candy) Non-Pork Clean
Co
Chick-O-Sticks, Coconut Long Boys Non-Pork Clean
Mint Twists, Peanut Butter Bars Non-Pork Clean
Rainbow Coconut Bars Non-Pork Clean
Rainbow Twists & Peco Brittle Non-Pork Clean
Bubble King
Gum Balls Non-Pork Clean
Brand
Colombina Candy Coastal Bay Confections Crystal Fruit Drops Animal Free Clean
Farley's &
Amazin' Fruit Gummi Bears Gelatin, Pork Unclean
Sather's
Heide Gummi Bears Gelatin, Pork Unclean
All Products with Gelatin/Carmine Pork Unclean
General Mills Buggles (All) Nat. Flavor sourced from pork Pork Unclean
Geotze's All Products Non-Pork Clean
Judson-Atkinson
Assorted Sour Balls Gelatin, Pork Unclean
Candies
The Stork
Mamba candies Beef Clean
Company
Riesen candies Beef Clean
Werthers candies Beef Clean
Tootsie Roll
Charm Blow Pops Glycerin, Synthetic Clean
Industries
(Concord
Junior Mints & Junior Caramels Glycerin, Synthetic Clean
Confections, Inc.)
Tootsie Rolls, Frooties, Pops Whey, Synthetic Clean
Caramel Apple Pops & Charleston Chews Whey, Synthetic Clean
Sugar Babies Whey, Synthetic Clean
Dubble Bubble Bubble Gum Pork Unclean
Goodmark Foods,
Andy Capp’s:
Inc. :
Cheddar Fries Non-pork enzymes Clean
Hot Fries Non-pork enzymes Clean
Salsa Fries Non-pork enzymes Clean
BBQ Fries Non-pork enzymes Clean
Pork - cross
Wrigley Co. All Gums, Life Savers, Gummies Unclean
contamination
Pork - cross-
Starburst Fruit Chews Unclean
contamination
Skittles (Most) No Cross-contamination. Made at
Non-Pork Clean
a different plant.
Skittles Crazy Cores Non-Gelatin Clean
Wyandot World
Aldi Brand:
Class Snacks
Clancy's Cheese Flavored Crunchy's Non-pork enzymes Clean
Casa Mamita (Aldi's)
Nacho Cheese Flavored Tortilla Chips Non-Pork Clean
Ranch Chips Non-Pork Clean
Tortilla Chips Non-Pork Clean
Note: Wyandot makes Nacho Cheese Flavored
Tortilla Chips for Casa Mamita, Kroger, Myers
and Albertson's (Jewel's). They are all Clean.
CEREALS
Kellogg Co. Most *Cereals (Look for "K" symbol) Gelatin, Beef Clean
Kellogg Fruity Marshmallow Krispies Gelatin, Pork Unclean
Marshmallow Fruit Loops Gelatin, Pork Unclean
Snack-Ums Rice Krispies Treat Krunch Gelatin, Pork Unclean
Kellogg Smorz Cereal Gelatin, Pork Unclean
*All Cereals containing marshmallow
Gelatin, Pork Unclean
derivatives
Gelatin, Pork/Cross
Borden Foods Cheese Singles Unclean
cont.
Natural Cheeses Pork-free Clean
Dole Foods, Inc. Fruit N' Gel Bowls (Most) Non-Pork Clean
Fruit N' Gel Bowls with Cochineal Cochineal Unclean
Jar Fruit Cochineal Unclean
Old Homes Foods Oberweiss, Low Fat Yogurt Gelatin, Beef Clean
Soft Whip Yogurt Non-Pork Clean
Oberweiss Milk VD3, non-pork Clean
Sara Lee Ball Park Beef & Kosher Beef Franks Non-Pork Clean
Use both pork and non-pork casing. The non-pork casing is collagen and is
The Turkey Store, Co.
man
made. NOTE: PLEASE READ THE LABEL!
Restaurant
Red Labeled Box (FRANKS) Check Casing
Brand:
Blue Labeled box (POLISH) Check Casing
Vlasic Foods
Swanson Pot Pies (All varieties) Lard, Pork Unclean
International
Great Starts Breakfast Entrée Pork Unclean
Swanson Frozen Entrée Meals Beef/Pork Unclean
Products bearing the OU kosher sysbol Clean
White Castle Frozen Hamburgers & Cheese Burgers Buns, L-Cysteine Unclean
Notes:
cRc - Chicago Rabbinical Council
OK - Organized Kashruth
OU - Orthodox Union
UMK - United Mehadrin Kosher