Criteria For Chamber Theater (Gas 12)

CRITERIA FOR CHAMBER THEATER (GAS 12)
Delivery -40%
(words are correctly pronounced, articulated andblended when

necessary,phrasing was divided according to thought unit,overalldelivery was
clear and audibly projected,voice was appropriately modulated basedon the idea
and emotional demands of the role, mood was properly projectedthrough pitch,
tone, tempo;pauses were appropriate and meaningful)
Interpretation-35%
(meaningand intent of the piece were clearly andcorrectly understood as shown

by the visual interpreation: movements were
appropriate and creative’execution of movement and gestures were orderly and
precise and consistent with the convention of Chamber Theater;costumes and

propsand other effects (if allowed) were meaningful and helpful in understanding
thetheme and in establishing the desired effect.
Stage Deportment and Discipline-15%
(the interpreter/s exhibiteddiscipline onstage (no distracting and inappropriate

movements and mannerisms),the interpreter/s mastered the piece by heart,the
interpreter/s exuded confidence inthe performance.
Over all effect-10%
( total harmony(vocal,aural and visual) waseffectively projected by the entire

performance)
35% – Content Quality: Does the video clearly make the connection between population and the
chosen topic?
4 Points
Population is clearly tied in with topic in an obvious manner; a strong connection is shown between
population and topic.
3 Points
Population is tied in with topic; a fairly clear connection is made between population and topic.
2 Points
Population is mentioned but the connection to topic is not supported.
1 Point
Population is not tied in with topic; no connection between population and topic is made.
Does the video explain why the chosen topic is important on a global scale?
4 Points
The video expertly makes the case for the topic’s importance using precise arguments.
3 Points
The video explains the topic’s importance but the arguments are not complete.
2 Points
The video states that the topic is important but provides little explanation.
1 Point
The video does not explain why the chosen topic is important.
35% – Memorable/Creative: How well does the video draw in the viewer and keep their attention?
4 Points
Viewer is left with a strong understanding of the topic, will remember the video, and feels like they want
to learn more.
3 Points
Viewer is left with general understanding and will remember the video.
2 Points
Viewer mostly understands the topic and might remember the video. Some introduced themes/topics
may distract from message.
1 Point
Presentation is unclear on the topic and unmemorable.
Is the video original and innovative?
4 Points
Video is original, creative and unique.
3 Points
Video has some original thought and is moderately creative.
2 Points
Video has little original thinking.
1 Point
Video has no original thinking.
20% – Logical Solution: Is the solution offered appropriate and supported by your claims?
4 Points
A strong solution is offered that is both logical and appropriate.
3 Points
A solution is offered but doesn’t clearly connect to the video’s claims. The solution is appropriate.
2 Points
A solution is offered by does not match the video’s claims or is not appropriate.
1 Point
No solution is offered.
10% – Production: What is the overall quality of production (including visual and sound elements)?
4 Points
Video is well planned with smooth transitions and edits. Sound is expertly balanced and easy to hear. All
sound and visual elements coincide with the video’s message.
3 Points
Video is well planned with competent edits. Sound is well balanced and easy to hear. Most sound and
visual elements blend with video’s message.
2 Points
Video was somewhat planned. Transitions and edits are rudimentary. Sound is reasonably balanced.
Some sound and visual elements are distracting.
1 Point
Video is not well planned and has poor edits. Sound is of poor quality. Many sound and visual elements
distract from the video’s message.

Criteria For Chamber Theater (Gas 12)

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Criteria For Chamber Theater (Gas 12)

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Criteria For Chamber Theater (Gas 12)

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

CRITERIA FOR CHAMBER THEATER (GAS 12)

(words are correctly pronounced, articulated andblended when

(meaningand intent of the piece were clearly andcorrectly understood as shown

appropriate and creative’execution of movement and gestures were orderly and

precise and consistent with the convention of Chamber Theater;costumes and

Stage Deportment and Discipline-15%

(the interpreter/s exhibiteddiscipline onstage (no distracting and inappropriate

Over all effect-10%

( total harmony(vocal,aural and visual) waseffectively projected by the entire

Population is mentioned but the connection to topic is not supported.

Presentation is unclear on the topic and unmemorable.

Is the video original and innovative?

Video is original, creative and unique.

Video has some original thought and is moderately creative.

Video has little original thinking.

Video has no original thinking.

A strong solution is offered that is both logical and appropriate.

You might also like

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.