M.

Kaleem Asif
Trait Report

T hanks for t aking t he t ime out t o complet e t he pymet rics assessment for Unilever! We hope you enjoyed t he experience, and t hat you will find your unique t rait report
int erest ing and informat ive. Remember, t here is no wrong end of t he spect rum - each t rait makes you unique and a great fit for cert ain t ypes of jobs!

Attention Control

59 %

You're e fficie nt Thoughtful

Attention Duration

56 %

Your mind some time s wande rs Atte ntive

Distraction - Freedom from Distraction (Speed)

52%

You're slowe d down by distractions You're not slowe d down by distractions

Distraction Filtering Effort

6 7%

You e ffortle ssly avoid distractions You do not scre e n out distractions without e xpe nding e ffort

Distraction Filtering Agility

60%

You block out distractions slowly You block out distractions quickly

Distraction - Freedom from Distraction

55%

You're more focuse d without distractions You re main focuse d in a distracting e nvironme nt

Distraction Filtering Ability

6 5%

You're ope n to ne w information You're gre at at scre e ning out distractions

Flexibility with Switching

60%

You focus on one thing at a time You're a maste r multi-taske r

77%

You're focuse d A maste r multi-taske r

Flexibility Adjustment Speed

57%

You e xpe nd e ffort to multi-task You're an e ffortle ss multi-taske r

Memory Span

58 %

You re me mbe r shorte r strings of information You re me mbe r longe r strings of information

Planning Speed

8 2%
You plan at a ve ry de libe rate pace You're an e fficie nt planne r

Planning Efficiency

56 %

You use trial and e rror to formulate a plan You're a planne r

Planning Accuracy

57%
You're improvisational A planne r

Processing Speed

55%

You're de libe rate in your proce ssing spe e d You're e fficie nt in your proce ssing spe e d

Processing Consistency

9 2%
Your proce ssing spe e d varie s Your proce ssing spe e d is consiste nt

Effort Overall

10 0 %
You don't waste e ffort on small de tails You go above and be yond to achie ve de sire d re sults

Effort with High Chance of Success

55%
You don't e xce ssive ly chase be tte r odds of succe ss You e xe rt e xtra e ffort to e nsure ce rtain succe ss
Effort with Low Chance of Success

55%
You don't e xe rt e xce ssive e ffort if the like lihood of succe ss is low You e xpe nd a lot of e ffort e ve n whe n the re is a low like lihood of succe ss

Effort for Low Reward

55%
You're not motivate d by re wards that are pe rce ive d as be ing only slightly large r You e xe rt e xtra e ffort to achie ve a slightly large r re ward

Effort for High Reward

51%
You're ofte n satisfie d by a mode rate re ward In se arch of a big re ward

Emotion Identification from Faces

9 7%
You de pe nd on more than just facial e xpre ssions to re ad e motions You're ade pt at re ading facial e xpre ssions

Emotion Identification from Context

75%
You're not influe nce d by situation and conte xt with re spe ct to your ability to re ad facial e xpre ssion Ade pt at re ading facial e xpre ssions in conte xt

Emotion Identification from Facts

57%
You trust your own e motions You're influe nce d e motionally by a situation's conte xt

Altruism Preference

66%

You make altruistic de cisions base d primarily on inte rnal be lie fs You incorporate the e xte rnal e nvironme nt and conte xt into altruistic de cisions

Altruism Extent

50 %

You're primarily conce rne d with your own goals You're altruistic

Fairness

90%

You te nd to be critical You're fair-minde d

Learning from Mistakes Well

58 %
You're not fluste re d by mistake s You do a good job of le arning from your mistake s
Learning from Mistakes Quickly

56 %

You're conte mplative afte r making a mistake You move quickly afte r making a mistake

Learning from Feedback

8 1%

You're se lf-dire cte d You le arn from fe e dback

Learning from Reward

50 %

You're inte rnally motivate d You're motivate d by mone tary re wards

Risk Learning from Ambiguous Risks

54 %
You stay focuse d on one strate gy You do a good job of le arning from your mistake s

Risk Preference for Ambiguous Risks

50 %

You're more like ly to be cautious You take ambiguous risks

Risk Learning from Low Risks

52%

Your ability to le arn isn't influe nce d by low-risk conditions You le arn we ll unde r low-risk conditions

Risk Preference for Low Risks

76 %

You're ve ry cautious You're willing to take risks unde r low-risk conditions

Risk Learning from High Risks

6 1%
Your ability to le arn isn't influe nce d by high-risk conditions You le arn we ll unde r high-risk conditions

Risk Preference for Medium Risks

88%

You're cautious You're willing to take risks unde r me dium-risk conditions

Risk Learning from Medium Risks

59 %

Your ability to le arn isn't influe nce d by me dium-risk conditions You le arn we ll unde r me dium-risk conditions
 Risk Preference for High Risks

90%

You're not like ly to se e k out high-risk e nvironme nts You're willing to take risks unde r high-risk conditions

T rust

60%
You te nd to be ske ptical You're trusting

Hope you found t his report useful. Remember, what ever t he out come, hope t his helps in your career journey.