Intelligent Transport Systems-A Case Study
Intelligent Transport Systems-A Case Study
Intelligent Transport Systems-A Case Study
Center
A Case Study
October 1999
Metropolitan Transportation
Management Center
A CASE STUDY
Michigan Intelligent
Transportation Systems
October 1999
Foreword
Dear Reader,
ITS has matured to the point that you don’t have to go it alone. We have
gained experience and are committed to providing our state and local
partners with the knowledge they need to lead their communities into
the next century.
The inside back cover contains details on the documents in this series,
as well as sources to obtain additional information. We hope you find
these documents useful tools for making important transportation
infrastructure decisions.
NOTICE
The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers.
Trademarks or manufacturers’ names appear herein only because they are
considered essential to the objective of this document.
The following case study provides a snapshot of Michigan’s Intelligent Preface
Transportation Systems transportation management center (MITSC). It
follows the outline provided in the companion document, Metropolitan
Transportation Management Center Concepts of Operation—A Cross Cutting
Study, which describes operations and management successful practices
and lessons learned from eight transportation management centers in the
United States and Canada.
This case study reflects information gathered from interviews and
observations at the downtown Detroit transportation management
center. The authors appreciate the cooperation and support of the
Michigan Department of Transportation and its partners in the
development of this document.
Background 1 Contents
Design and Implementation 3
Operations 5
Maintenance 6
1
Background
The Michigan Intelligent Transportation System Transportation Manage-
ment Center (MITSC) contains both an original system dating from 1981
covering 32.5 miles, and an expansion of the system to cover a total of
180 centerline miles of freeway that is still being constructed. The original
system concept was prepared in 1969. On the basis of the performance of
the original system, there was a desire within Michigan Department of
Transportation for system expansion, but acquiring the necessary funding
was a problem. Two years of Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality
funding was eventually identified to fund the expansion.
A formal set of goals and objectives are being developed. Based on discus-
sions to date, the primary system objectives are to:
• Improve safety and air quality
• Reduce stress for motorists.
The focus of activity in the MITSC is to make the traveler’s trip less stressful
by providing better information to the traveler. When a problem occurs,
the MITSC helps Michigan State Patrol and others correct it quickly.
Courtesy of MapQuest
2
Design and Implementation
General system design parameters for Michigan’s Intelligent The Detroit TMC
Transportation System Transportation Management Center are the developed special
following:
procedures to smooth
• The older portion of the system includes ramp meters, detectors, and traffic flow to and
closed-circuit television with communications via coaxial cable. The from major parking
portion being implemented includes the same components and
Highway Advisory Radio, communicating via microwave and spread sites for its large
spectrum to an OC-48 fiber optic network. downtown special
• The control center is above the Greyhound bus garage in downtown events venues.
Detroit with close access to the freeway. The control room is roughly
30 feet by 80 feet. The front of the room contains two dozen 25-inch
color video monitors and an 8-foot by 9-foot video wall. Front to
back, the room contains a row of four operator positions, a supervisor
console, and then two rows of cubicles for Michigan State Patrol
dispatch and other services. The rear of the room provides closed
offices for the Michigan State Patrol.
3
Design and Implementation
Method of • The new system is being implemented through a firm fixed-price
design/build/warranty contract. The contractor was selected based
Implementation
on best perceived value. The original system was implemented and
has been expanded through conventional consultant design and low-
bid construction contracts.
Training • The contractor will provide training and operator and system
documentation. Staff are being trained as new subsystems come
online. New system staff are provided “hands-on” training by the
Assistant Operations Manager.
• Once training materials are accepted, their upkeep becomes Michigan
Department of Transportation’s responsibility.
4
Operations
• There are two shifts, operated by three temporary personnel per shift. Workload and
Shift break is at noon, with roughly a 30-minute overlap. Michigan State
Patrol works 24 hours a day, 7 days a week with different shift breaks.
Performance
• System operation is being privatized; the privatization contractor is
studying system operation.
• Typically six to twelve incidents that require active management occur
daily. The system is also used to provide information regarding
recurring congestion, including congestion related to the road
construction in the area.
• Operator actions are logged manually. The new system will provide
automatic logging of most activity.
• Operations staff work extensively with MDOT Construction and
MDOT Maintenance in identifying faults and repairing field
equipment. They also monitor radio traffic to maintenance staff and
field engineers, and answer the MITSC’s switchboard number.
• Traffic management plans for special events are developed by ad hoc Nonstandard
teams. MDOT coordinates with major parking facilities during special
events. Operations
• An emergency operation planning process will be implemented once
the new system is accepted.
5
Maintenance
Fault Detection • The new system indicates equipment malfunction through changes in
icon color of the device on the system map. Not all devices are
and Correction
monitored constantly due to limitations on total communication
bandwidth.
• Failures noted in use or reported by the system are logged manually,
and calls placed to MDOT Maintenance, internal MITSC staff, or to
the contractor.
6
For further information, contact:
Representing:
FOR A CURRENT LISTING OF AVAILABLE DOCUMENTS, PLEASE VISIT OUR WEB SITE AT:
www.its.dot.gov
ITS WEB RESOURCES
FHWA-OP-99-007 FTA-TRI-11-99-20