Blackbook Bata
Blackbook Bata
Blackbook Bata
In August 2003, Doug Hearns, CEO Bata Pakistan, was considering the
efforts necessary to realign Bata Pakistan’s manufacturing outsourcing,
distribution, and brand strategy in the light of increased local competition
and Chinese imports. Doug had joined Bata as CEO in January 2002,
with 19 years of experience in the company including 1½ years as Head
of Marketing in Bangladesh, and another 2½ years in the same capacity in
Pakistan. Traditionally, Bata had catered to the lower middle and middle
class market. In 2001, however, Bata decided that instead of competing at
the lower end of the Pakistani market, it would concentrate on the higher
end, through new fashion brands such as Marie Claire and licensing
global brands such as Slazenger and Hush Puppies.
Thus, it seemed critical that Bata should take some bold decisions to
prepare for the strategic landscape ahead. In 2002, Pakistan, with a
population of 140 million and about 3 per cent annual growth rate, had a
footwear market of above 150 million pairs per year. There were two
distinct classes of suppliers to this market. The informal sector with about
80 per cent market share comprised over 17,000 units, each with an
average of two employees. Firms in this sector generally paid no taxes,
and predominantly sold non-branded shoes through cobbler shops.
The other vertically integrated firm was Service Industries1 which was
established in 1954 and owned a tannery and shoe factories in Muridke
and Gujrat. During the 1960s and 1970s, Service followed the practice of
opening a store wherever Bata opened a store.
The retail outlets were mostly in rented properties, and both firms
benefited from an inefficient property market, which allowed low rents to
continue for decades despite double digit inflation. Both brands were
extensively advertised particularly during Eid festivals and school
openings, and became known for providing reliable quality shoes at
affordable prices.
By 2001, Bata had invested Rs 430 million2 in its factories and about Rs
150 million in stores and fittings (see Exhibit 2 for an organisation chart
and Exhibit 3 for financial statements). Smaller non-integrated
manufacturers with limited access to quality raw material, reliable
distribution networks, low cost capital and imported technology, were
unable to compete against Bata and Service.
Smaller players lacked access to low cost capital and imported
technology available to the larger players in the 1960’s. At that time, the
government through an extensive industrialization plan provided selected
access to capital and licenses which were required for importing
equipment. The smaller players neither had the political clout of the
Service Group nor the multinational influence wielded by Bata to benefit
from government policy.
This allows retail chains, who are sourcing from such manufacturers, to
make 20 per cent higher margins than is possible at stores owned by Bata
and Servis. Throughout the six decades since its establishment in 1942,
Bata remained the country’s largest shoe manufacturer, with a share of 11
per cent of the 150 million pair shoe market. In 2002, Bata had two plants,
350 retail outlets, over 3 thousand employees, sales turnover of Rs 2.3
billion, and profits before taxes of Rs 79 million. Bata produced 14
million pairs and procured another 3 million from outside suppliers.
Bata’s closest competitor was Service with local sales of 5 million pairs.
The number of tanneries tripled during the decade from 180 to 509,
making quality finished leather widely available to footwear
manufacturers. The increase in tanneries was a direct consequence of
increased leather exports, caused by the widespread closure of tanneries
in Europe resulting from ecological concerns. Changes in the global
leather industry provided local tanners access to inexpensive used
equipment and technology from their international customers.
In 2002, Bata’s product line included about 1,500 SKUs. Bata marketed
these SKUs under international brands licensed from the parent company.
Some of these international brands which had been introduced in the
early 1980s and even earlier included North Star, a unisex brand of
joggers aimed at teenagers; Power, a brand designed for specialized
sports footwear such as football, tennis and cricket; Bubble Gummers,
which were fun shoes for children; Marie Claire, fashion shoes for
women; Sandak, trendy low-cost plastic shoes worn as casual footwear in
the summer; and Safari casual footwear.
Bata’s aim is to cater to the middle and upper middle class segments. Our
core customer is a family with four children. We do not want to compete
head-on with Servis, which caters to a somewhat richer segment. During
the late 1990s, Servis had a strong brand Calza in the PU slipper segment,
and Cheetah in joggers. With help from our development centre in
Padova Italy, Bata developed Plaza, which was a house brand aimed at
competing with Calza.
Plaza was a great success and captured a major market share of this
subcategory. We then looked at our jogger brand Power. Our
merchandising department said that Power could not sell as it was just not
competing with Cheetah. The management decided to take a period of
three years from 1999 to 2002 to develop a new product range.
At the same time, with the help of our design consultant in Taiwan, we
obtained training in new technology and designs. We are importing
complete finished shoes, and in 2003 are launching Power with a variety
of product lines. In the meantime, we introduced the Slazenger brand to
compete against Cheetah.
We had expanded from 4 brands in the early eighties to 40, and now we
are coming back to 5 global brands, i.e., Bata, Marie Claire, Power,
Bubble Gummers and Weinbrenner, in addition to our local brands such
as Sandak and Hawaii. We have decided to discontinue several brands
including Emozioni in women’s fashion, King Street in men’s, and North
Star in joggers. In the future we will go for global brands, using BIG
(Bata International Group). These could include Barbie a fashion shoe for
young girls, Hush Puppies for men, and Dr Scholl’s for women.
.
In 2002, the department had three brand managers, one each for Hush
Puppies, sports shoes (Slazenger, Power), and women’s shoes (Marie
Claire), and also four merchandising officers, one each for other shoe
categories such as men’s formal shoes, children’s shoes, PVC, and
Sandak. Another position being considered was for non-footwear items
such as clothing.