Library Satisfaction
Library Satisfaction
Library Satisfaction
A Thesis Proposal
Submitted by
CHAPTER 1
Introduction
School library are filled with stacks of books and resources where students,
teachers and other staff members have access in it. It includes magazines,
newspapers, films, audios, DVDs, maps, manuscripts, e-books and various other
formats. Libraries are becoming a center where people can engage in learning,
enjoy reading and explore their interest in different subjects. Library is the best
place to spend leisure time wisely that leads to the overall development and well-
to books, resources and information technology to all the members of the school.
The benefits of libraries are countless as they play a vital role in helping people by
attract people to read and develop habit of reading and learning. It increases their
thirst for reading and expands knowledge. Library is also essential for any kind of
read peacefully. Any kind of library is an asset to our community. It is the leap in
good habit. Visiting the library and reading can be the best way to spend leisure
time and to learn something new. Libraries play important role in progress and
Polytechnic University of the Philippines, Sta. Mesa, Manila. For the study
use library?
4. Is there a significant relationship between the students’ satisfaction and library
Hypothesis
There is a high level of satisfaction of students in Library at Polytechnic
This study is limited to all selected students who are using library at Polytechnic
satisfaction in library and to identify if the students has relation into the factors that
Sta. Mesa, Manila and will not scope the students from other schools for more
University Library. This study will help the University Library to improve its own
facilities and to encourage more students to use our Library. It will also help them
Students. This study will help for the educational and personal development of the
the students.
Future Researchers. This study will offer the future researchers’ data, information,
familiarity and relevance to different topics that can be related to their research.
Theoretical Framework
his LibrayCrunch blog. Though his writings on Library 2.0 are groundbreaking and
in many ways authoritative, Casey (2006a) defines the term very broadly, arguing it
blogging librarians have begun conceptually exploring what Library 2.0 might
mean, and because of this disparate discussion with very wide parameters, there is
some controversy over the definition and relative importance of the term. The
nature of this controversy Lawson (2006), Peek (2005), and Tebbutt (2006) explore
and begin to adequately rectify, and Crawford (2006) provides a very thorough
P O LY T E C H N I C U N I V E R S I T Y O F T H E P H I L I P P I N E S 5
account of the ambiguity and confusion surrounding the term, partially suggesting
A theory for Library 2.0 could be understood to have these four essential
elements:
services they view within the library's web-presence, OPAC, etc. The
consumption and creation of content is dynamic, and thus the roles of librarian
Library 2.0 contain video and audio components. While this is not often cited as
There are both synchronous (e.g. IM) and asynchronous (e.g. wikis) ways for
understands that as communities change, libraries must not only change with
them, they must allow users to change the library. It seeks to continually
change its services, to find new ways to allow communities, not just individuals
egalitarian electronic space. While Librarian 2.0 might act as a facilitator and
provide support, he or she is not necessarily primarily responsible for the creation
of the content. Users interact with and create resources with one another and with
the library as place. A library's presence on the Web in Library 2.0 includes the
presence of that library's constituency and utilizes the same applications and
Conceptual Framework
The dependent variable of the researchers was Students’ satisfaction and the
Library Services, Library Collections. It shown that the library users do concern
P O LY T E C H N I C U N I V E R S I T Y O F T H E P H I L I P P I N E S 7
about the library quality. Therefore, it can be concluded that a library can achieve
high impact on the quality if it emphasizes the students’ satisfaction and meet all
CHAPTER 2
provided correspond closely with the information needs of its users. Edem and
part of universities and have a critical role to play in supporting the core mission of
the university that is teaching, learning and research. However, according to Tiefel
(2004) most library users are unaware of the quality and variety of information
available. Tiefel pointed out that students are often satisfied with materials that an
experienced librarian would find inadequate and /or inappropriate. It was identified
that discipline has a major influence on usage patterns and preferences, and that
faculty members in science tend to use the library more intensively than their
al., 2003). Danuta A. Nitecki (1996) also claims that the assessment of how well a
library succeeds depends on the user as a judge of quality. As these views gain
and their programs to become better customer advocates and address their
the provision of relevant information resources and quality services to meet their
users’ information needs. Sowole (1995) noted that users are described as the
raison (reason for existence) of the library. Meeting the information needs of users
P O LY T E C H N I C U N I V E R S I T Y O F T H E P H I L I P P I N E S 9
requires the provision of the actual information resources and services that will
satisfy the needs of users. Simmonds (2001) stated several factors that can
make maximum efforts to ensure that their library users derived the best possible
benefits from the services they render. Materials are to be provided by libraries to
support the learning, teaching and research processes and to provide assistance
to users. Simmonds and Andaleeb (2001) argued that providing quality services in
academic libraries is now a major issue among academic librarians; they see the
library more in terms of the provision of and access to service quality than as just a
physical place. Technology and automation have also changed the way people
perceive libraries. They emphasize the provision of good library service as more
important to the users than the mere physical library building. This perspective as
evidence in several recent studies on users’ satisfaction with library services with
academic and research libraries can distinguish their services through friendly,
helpful and knowledgeable advice and the best technological resources academic
libraries users have varying needs and expectations, it is the responsibility of the
library staff to know these needs and expectations and strive to meet them. Igben
(1993) noted that for a library to be most functional, the services it renders should
correspond closely with the needs of its users. Ensuring that relevant information
resources are provided and made accessible to users goes a long way to
encourage users to visit the library more often. Simmonds and Andaleeb (2001)
stated that the effectiveness of libraries has often been measured by the volume of
library materials available to clients, the amount of use of services and resources,
designing library services based on user needs. He notes that user needs change
continuously and recognizes also the need to reach out to users with new services.
Sureshchandar et al. (2002) found that service quality and customer satisfaction
knowledge and information availability from both printed as well as online media.
User satisfaction and optimization of resources have become important areas for
libraries to maintain awareness of. Many libraries especially the university libraries
are focusing on evaluation of the users' needs and their satisfaction with their
services. User surveys can provide useful perceptions of service quality in libraries.
For example, Texas University libraries conducted focus group studies in 2001 with
P O LY T E C H N I C U N I V E R S I T Y O F T H E P H I L I P P I N E S 11
service points. The sessions revealed that users were generally pleased with the
assistance provided them by professional staff at reference desks and that they
found librarians to be usually patient and helpful although there were some
studies are being used to improve library directional tools and to improve staff
training for public service staff (Crowley and Gilreath, 2002). User feedback is
any library. This is the reason that library user surveys have become another study
did not use library resources for various reasons, among which are students‟
found that about 69% indicated that they approached the library resources by first
going to the shelves instead of the catalogues. McCarthy (1999) studied students‟
use of library resources at the University of Rhodes Island. The results showed that
60% of the students believed that they are effective seekers and users of library
resources, only 40% were not satisfied with their search for resources in that
library. Berling, and Cudd (1997) assert that the library user is regarded as the
most logical source to determine whether the library is playing its role satisfactorily
or not. The resources of a library can influence its use as depicted by Adeoti,
(1998) which showed that students indicated that they use the library more to read
P O LY T E C H N I C U N I V E R S I T Y O F T H E P H I L I P P I N E S 12
their personal books than for any other purposes. Osinulu, (1998) examines
patterns of use in a university library in Nigeria by analyzing user records and data
which show low use of the library due to lack of awareness. The emerging role of
enhanced by two main challenges. First, the value of information lies in the ability
to access and adapt to suit new applications and improve the efficiency of existing
systems. Universities are called upon not only to generate new knowledge but also
to be able to market the innovations that have been generated out of knowledge
facilitate quick, efficient access, integrate and repackage information for the end-
Second, the new knowledge economy emphasizes that knowledge from wherever
aspect of users’ studies is a vital aid for effective planning and management in
important part of the set-up of academic institutions and perhaps the major users of
particularly the academic staff also use the library. The need for good libraries in
education depends on the library, not the library as a magnificent building but the
P O LY T E C H N I C U N I V E R S I T Y O F T H E P H I L I P P I N E S 13
use of it. It is important that libraries serving academic communities have the
broadest possible collection of books and other essential materials. The academic
unrestricted to help himself to the whole field of knowledge and practical life of the
past, present and prognostications for the future. If a library is well stocked and the
students know they can find more information than what they are taught, they will
use the library maximally Ikolo (2015) examined user’s satisfaction with library
services: a case study of Delta State University Library. It was discovered that
library users were not satisfied with reference services, inter-library loan services,
library services, book lending services, CD-ROM services and indexing and
abstracting services. It was also seen that library users were not satisfied with the
journals and the inability to borrow books from the library. But they were satisfied
user’s satisfaction with library resources and services in the College of Health
Sciences Library, Niger Delta University. It is in the light of the above that this study
to assure that users' information needs are continually being met. The availability
influence on users' satisfaction. When users are satisfied with library information
resources, they not only come back but speak well of the library to other users.
Library plays a very important role in promoting the progress of knowledge. Library
resources. This study will fill in as a manual for improve the collection and services
of the library. The results of the survey will inform gap in the way of improvement of
CHAPTER 3
P O LY T E C H N I C U N I V E R S I T Y O F T H E P H I L I P P I N E S 15
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
Research Design
of research led on library services quality and related issues. The following stage
included assembling data straightforwardly from the students that use the library.
familiar with their academic libraries. The survey was an instrumental in evaluating
the qualities and shortcomings of the questionnaire and in guaranteeing that every
The overall population are the students from Polytechnic University of the
Philippines who are using library. Therefore, the selected students were the main
type of sampling, specifically, stratified random sampling. It will be used to get the
population size in library. This method allows the researcher to get a small group of
respondents which is also called sample size. The target sample size will be
considered by getting the 25% of the population. The said 25% will make the
The selected students who are using library at Polytechnic University of the
Philippines.
The gathering of data was made possible through the effort done by the
First, the researchers approached the Director of the Library and requested to
Finally, the researchers collected the questionnaires after acquiring all the data
needed for tallying purpose. The score was treated and interpreted through the
Research Instrument
The questionnaire will be the major instrument used in this study. The
The following arbitrary levels will be used to describe the said library
5 - Fully satisfied
3 - Satisfied
2 - Less satisfied
1 - Not Satisfied
The data collected by the researchers followed some statistical tools and
measures for the data analysis: Multiple regression analysis: used for predicting
the unknown value of a variable from the known value of two or more variables. By
multiple regression, we mean models with just one dependent and two or more
independent variables.