Reflection 2

Running head: DE/RECONSTRUCTING YOUR STRENGTHS 1
De/Reconstructing Your Strengths
Critical Reflection Exercise #2
Madison Schaefer
Loyola University Chicago

DE/RECONSTRUCTING YOUR STRENGTHS 2
I have always enjoyed learning about myself in any way that I can and personality tests,
like the StrengthsFinder, are no exception. My five strengths are Discipline, Learner,
Communication, Focus, and Woo and I see parts of myself in each one. However, in discussing
these results, I was not aware of the many questions surrounding the accuracy and reliability of
the StrengthsFinder. I found deconstructing this theory rather difficult as I feel my results are a
fairly accurate representation of myself. What could possibly be wrong with a test that simply
informs someone of their best attributes and how they can be applied to the world? Conversely,
when considering the tools of deconstruction, it is easy to see that many are at play.
Commodification is applicable as this is a company that makes money from telling people what
is great about them without providing statistical facts to prove its relevancy. Willful blindness is
also it pertinent because it urges people to relinquish their weaknesses and recognize only their
strengths. Although, when reconstructing, if we cultivate agency and identify our strengths, we
bolster our efficacy. By also striving to build unity among those who we acknowledge have
different strengths than us, we can disrupt the hegemonic norms of society and form interest
convergence. Although it was initially challenging to deconstruct the StrengthsFinder,
reconstructing it gave me a greater perspective which has encouraged me to remain
conscientious of everyone’s differing stocks of knowledge and how it could affect their
perception of the StrengthsFinder in a potentially negative way.
After deconstructing and reconstructing the StrengthsFinder, I have become more aware
of my implicit biases. In engaging with this theory, I automatically assumed that it is a universal
test that applies to everyone. However, Dugan discusses in Chapter 4 that the strength of
Activator cannot pertain to students of color and by taking the StrengthsFinder, colored people
are involved in hegemony, probably without even realizing it (Dugan, 2017, p. 102). This idea
helped me grasp the importance of my social location, even concerning something as seemingly
positive and innocent as a personality test. Being a majority race and growing up with a decent
amount of privilege, I must take extra care in considering how hegemonic norms could be at play
in all experiences of my life. Similarly, this activity has lead me to a better understanding of how
the context and social constructions of a situation can leave a lasting impact on society.
StrengthsFinder is a platform that businesses use globally and one’s results could be a reason to
get a job or not. However, Gallup does not release any statistical support in attempt to prove its
accuracy. Instead, organizations have ignored this lack of evidence and socially constructed the
StrengthsFinder to simply be an efficient tool to find someone who is the right fit for a position
being sought to fill. We do not challenge social constructions because we are often unaware that
they are in fact socially constructed. It was valuable for me to learn that social constructions can
be anywhere, even places I am not looking.
Although it was initially difficult, I have gained a lot from deconstructing and
reconstructing strengths-based leadership. A benefit to doing so is addressing how strengths-
based leadership completely ignores the idea that people have weaknesses. I believe that in order
to be the best leader possible, one must bolster their strengths but also recognize their
weaknesses. Although I do not think that it is always necessary, or possible, to work on or fix
one’s weaknesses, a person cannot reach their full potential without acknowledging their flaws.
However, since this theory encourages one to only learn the best parts of themselves, that is the
only part they will focus on, leaving a disconnect in understanding oneself. Likewise, if a person
is only aware of their strengths, they will often overcompensate these characteristics as they
believe they are simply putting their best selves forward. Nonetheless, too much of a good thing
can lead to a bad thing because overemphasized strengths can easily turn into weaknesses. For
instance, if I over-used my strength of Discipline, I would likely become excessively controlling
and autonomous, causing exclusion among my colleagues without acknowledging it. However, it
is also beneficial to recognize the notion that everyone has diverse strengths in life. It is
important to remain cognizant to that idea because all people will go about life in a different way
than myself personally and that does not necessarily mean it is wrong.
As previously stated throughout my reflection, I initially found it arduous to deconstruct
the StrengthsFinder as it is so widely used and I deemed it to be an accurate representation of
myself. I am a strong believer in taking any step possible to better understand myself and I saw
the StrengthsFinder as an excellent avenue to do so. This leads me to address why I may have
struggled with this process. It is human nature and part of our ego to withstand judgement
regarding the things we love simply because no one ever wants to admit they are wrong. This
explains why humans experience cognitive dissonance in attempt to justify being blatantly
incorrect. It is also difficult to pick apart an idea that is so widely accepted as the ultimate truth
preached by a company that is earning a solid amount of revenue for this testimony. Because of
these ideas, I blindly succumbed to hegemonic views regarding the StrengthsFinder. Often once
we are exposed to hegemony, we turn a blind eye to it because we do not want to admit that we
are pawns in the ideology of society. However, by deconstructing these ideas, we are admitting
to our faults head on. It is sometimes challenging for me to foresee how much of an impact I can
truly make, individually, in countering ideology and hegemony. Yet, in deconstructing ideas I
hold dear, I can inspire and encourage others to do the same.

References
Dugan, J. P. (2017). Leadership theory: cultivating critical perspectives. San Francisco, CA:
Jossey-Bass.

Reflection 2

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Reflection 2

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Reflection 2

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Running head: DE/RECONSTRUCTING YOUR STRENGTHS 1

De/Reconstructing Your Strengths

Critical Reflection Exercise #2

Loyola University Chicago

convergence. Although it was initially challenging to deconstruct the StrengthsFinder,

reconstructing it gave me a greater perspective which has encouraged me to remain

perception of the StrengthsFinder in a potentially negative way.

be anywhere, even places I am not looking.

reconstructing strengths-based leadership. A benefit to doing so is addressing how strengths-

instance, if I over-used my strength of Discipline, I would likely become excessively controlling

As previously stated throughout my reflection, I initially found it arduous to deconstruct

the StrengthsFinder as it is so widely used and I deemed it to be an accurate representation of

hold dear, I can inspire and encourage others to do the same.

You might also like

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.