The document discusses the flat tax system as an alternative to the current progressive tax system. It outlines some of the perceived advantages of a flat tax, such as simplicity, decreased tax fraud, and improved fairness. However, it also notes that the flat tax may not actually simplify the tax system that much and could result in lower tax revenues from wealthy individuals if the flat tax rate is too low. Ultimately, the document concludes that changing over 100 years of a progressive tax system to a flat tax would come with huge complications.
The document discusses the flat tax system as an alternative to the current progressive tax system. It outlines some of the perceived advantages of a flat tax, such as simplicity, decreased tax fraud, and improved fairness. However, it also notes that the flat tax may not actually simplify the tax system that much and could result in lower tax revenues from wealthy individuals if the flat tax rate is too low. Ultimately, the document concludes that changing over 100 years of a progressive tax system to a flat tax would come with huge complications.
The document discusses the flat tax system as an alternative to the current progressive tax system. It outlines some of the perceived advantages of a flat tax, such as simplicity, decreased tax fraud, and improved fairness. However, it also notes that the flat tax may not actually simplify the tax system that much and could result in lower tax revenues from wealthy individuals if the flat tax rate is too low. Ultimately, the document concludes that changing over 100 years of a progressive tax system to a flat tax would come with huge complications.
The document discusses the flat tax system as an alternative to the current progressive tax system. It outlines some of the perceived advantages of a flat tax, such as simplicity, decreased tax fraud, and improved fairness. However, it also notes that the flat tax may not actually simplify the tax system that much and could result in lower tax revenues from wealthy individuals if the flat tax rate is too low. Ultimately, the document concludes that changing over 100 years of a progressive tax system to a flat tax would come with huge complications.
Above is a cartoon that basically explains why the flat tax doesn’t work.
What is a Flat Tax?
Many – predominately Republicans (though many independents and Democrats support it as well)– have considered a very simple alternative to the current progressive tax system: a flat tax. A flat tax system is one in which people are charged the same tax rate (%) of their income. There are several kinds of flat-taxes, from a marginal flat tax-rate to one with limited deductions. However, this post will only be discussing the simple flat tax on taxable incomes, with all else remaining the same.
Advantages of The Flat Tax – Or Are They?
To most people the word “simple” comes to mind when asked what they think of a flat tax and that is the primary reason most people support a flat tax. But that is not so easy to say. While the flat tax would make taxes easier, by how much? Determining taxable income with deductibles and tax credits and all the other things would remain in place. Not only that, other complicated parts of the federal income tax could remain unaffected, such as the “alternative minimum tax” and other more complicated sections. The flip side is another argument for the flat tax, being simpler would decrease tax fraud and should increase government tax revenues. While it’s proven to be true in certain countries, it is not in all countries. The flat tax is also a generally low one, so the middle class and lower income individuals do not get angry. While it might keep them happy, the wealthy pay a lot less money to the federal government if the flat tax rate is too low. A third argument for the flat tax would be improved fairness because everyone pays the same percent of their taxable income. Several studies have also shown that many different companies whom are given the same person’s file, end up with a different amount of tax to be paid to the IRS. This can create income inequality because the smartest people could change their taxes in a way so that they pay the least. Another theory is that the flat tax will increase consumption spending and investment and cause a “trickle-down” effect in the economy. Because of the boom, people would pay more taxes and so government revenues would also increase despite having a lower tax rate. While this worked for some countires, it has also not worked for others. Simply put, changing 100+ years of a progressive tax into a flat tax has huge complications.