Test Report Field Density Test Sand Replacement Method: Project Name

MECADEZ CORE TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE LIMITED
PROJECT MANA6EMENT 6 C O N S U L T A W SERVICES
Test Report
Field Density Test by Sand Replacement Method
Project Name Improvements and Asphalting to Hosur road fiom Lalbagh North Gate to
Dairy circle
Client The Executive Engineer, Road Infrastructure, South Division, BBMP

Job NO MCTPL/BBMP/RI-S/PMC/13- 14/RW/O9
Mix Type Wet Mix Macadam
Contractor K.R.1.D.L
Test Method IS: 2720 (Part - 16) 1963 & Specification for Road & Bridge Works,
Location bay
Material Wet Mix Macadam
Sample No 2
Date 20-Dec-20 14
Test Hole No 2
MDD 2.24
OMC in % 3.20
Bulk Density Ys 1.39
Weight of Sand In cone W 1 (gm) 1195.00
Weight Of Wet soil From Hole (W2) 4325.00
Wt Of Sand +Cylinder Before Pouring (W3)gm 17000.00
Wt Of Sand +Cylinder After Pouring (W4) gm 13170.00
Wt Of Sand In Hole: W5 = W3 - W4- W l (gm) 2635.00
Volume of Hole: V= W5/ Ys
Bulk Density Yb= W 2 N (gdcc)
Moisture Meter Reading (%)
Moisture Content : w (From Graph In %)
1892.96
2.28
1.59
3.30
4
Dry Density Yd = Yb/(l+W/100) 2.21
Field Compaction(%) 98.74
Note:
i. The results indicated above are based on the tests carried out on the sample at site.
ii. The results relate only to the items tested.
ort should not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of this laboratory.
garding the report must be reported immediately.
nologies Private Limited.
Authorised Signature
F
PROJECT MANAQMMT 6 CONSULTAW SERmES
Test Report '
Field Density Test by Sand Replacement Method
Project Name Improvements and Asphalting to Hosur road fiom Lalbagh North Gate to
Dairy circle

Job NO MCTPLIBBMPIRI-SIPMCI13-14/RW/09
Mix Type Wet Mix Macadam
Test Method IS: 2720 (Part - 16) 1963 & Specification for Road & Bridge Works,
Location bay
Material Wet Mix Macadam
Sample No 3
Date 20-Dec-2014
Test Hole No 3
MDD 2.24
OMC in % 3.20 -
Bulk Density Y s 1.39
Weight of Sand In cone W 1 (gm) 1195.00
Weight Of Wet soil From Hole (W2) 4430.00
Wt Of Sand +Cylinder Before Pouring ( W 3 ) p 17000.00
Wt Of Sand +Cylinder After Pouring (W4) gm 13110.00
Wt Of Sand In Hole: W5 = W3 - W4- W1 ( p ) 2695.00
Volume of Hole: V= W5I Ys 1936.06
Bulk Density Yb= W2N (gmlcc) 2.29
Moisture Meter Reading (%) 1.56
Moisture Content : w (From Graph In %) 3.32
Dry Density Yd = Yb/(l tWI100) 2.21
Field Compaction(%) 98.87
Note:
iii. This test report should not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of this laboratory.
regarding the report must be reported immediately.
Fo
A
Mecadez Core Technologies Private Limited
Project Management and Consultancy Services
Temperature Record Log Sheet
Project Name I m p r o v e m e n t & A s p h a l t i n g to H o s u r road f r o m L a l b a g h N o r t h g a t e to D a i r y Circle
Client BBMP
Mix Type D E N S E BITUMINOUS MACADAM
Contractor KRIDL
Date: 121112015
Mix Depth of
Cleaning of the Application M i x Laying Rolling Depth of the the mix
S1 No Tipper No Time M i x Before After Remarks
Surface of Tackcoat Temperature (c') Temperatu
Rolling (mm) Rolling
re (cO)
fmm)
25 KA 51 8998 11.40 Yes Yes 132 119 65 50
26 KA 05 A B 413 11.50 Yes Yes 131 116 65 50
27 KA 05 C 9339 12.00 Yes Yes 131 116 65 50
28 KA05 D 9119 12.05 Yes Yes 131 122 65 50
29 KA 51 B 4122 12.15 Yes Yes 130 119 65 50
30 KA 05 D 9229 12.20 Yes Yes 132 118 65 50
31 KA 51 B 1661 12.30 Yes Yes 132 119 65 50
32 KA 51 B 1551 12.40 Yes Yes 131 122 65 50
33 KA 05 C 9449 12.50 Yes Yes 132 119 65 50
Mix Depth of
Rolling Depth of the the
Cleaning of the Application M i x Laying
S1 No Tipper No Time M i x Before After Remarks
Surface of Tackcoat Temperature (c")Temperatu
Rolling (mm) Rolling
re (cO)
Imm)
59 KA 51 B 4122 4.45 Yes Yes 130 119 65 50
60 KA 05 D 9229 4.55 Yes Yes 132 118 65 50
61 KA 51 B 1661 5.10 Yes Yes 132 119 65 50
62 KA 51 B 1551 5.15 Yes Yes 13 1 122 65 50
Project Management and Consultancy Services
Temperature Record Log Sheet
Project N a m e I m p r o v e m e n t & A s p h a l t i n g t o H o s u r road f r o m L a l b a g h N o r t h gate to D a i r y Circle
Client BBMP
Mix Type D E N S E BITUMINOUS MACADAM
Contractor KRIDL
22 KA 51 B 4122 11.05 Yes Yes 130 119 65 50

23 KA 05 D 9229 11.15 Yes Yes 132 118 65 50
24 KA 51 B 1661 11.25 Yes Yes 132 119 65 50
25 KA 51 B 1551 11.30 Yes Yes 131 122 65 50
26 KA 05 C 9449 11.40 Yes Yes 132 119 65 50
Mix Depth of Depth of
M i x Laying the M i x the M i x
Cleaning of the Application Rolling
S1 No Tipper No Time Temperature Before After Remarks
Surface of Tackcoat Temperatu
(cO) re (c0)
Rolling Rolling
Imm) Imm)
27 KA 05 B 9559 11.50 Yes Yes 132 118 65 50
28 KA 51 C 1419 11.55 Yes Yes 13 1 119 65 50
29 KA 51 5998 12.05 Yes Yes 130 120 65 50
CONCRETE
MIX DESIGN
PROJECT MANA6EMENT d, CONSULTANCY SERVICES i
BITUMINOUS CONCRETE
(Design Mix 1Job Mix Formula)
Project Name Improvements a n d Asphalting t o H o s u r r o a d f r o m Lalbagh North G a t e t o

Dairy circle
Client T h e Executive Engineer, Road Infrastructure, S o u t h Division, BBMP
Design Mix Bituminous Concrete (BC)
Date 28/12/2014
Design MixlJob Mix formula for Bituminous Concrete (BC) is based from clause 507 of MORT&H Specification
for Road and Bridge work (5' Revision).
1. MATERIALS PROPOSED TO BE USED
I. Coarse Aggregate (A) 19.2mm & down Size

(B) 13.2 mm & down size
(C) 2.36 & down Size
11. Fine Aggregate
(D) Mineral Filler Cement
111. Bitumen 60170 Grade Bitumen
2. PHYSICAL REQUIREMENT OF COARSE AGGREGATE FOR

BITUMINOUS CONCRETE (BC)
SL.
TEST REQUIREMENT RESULT AS REMARKS
NO PER TEST
1 Grain size Analysis (Dust) 5% max passing, 0.075 4.75 %
mm sieve Physical
Requirement
2 Flakiness and Elongation Indices 30% (Max) 21%
of
(Combined)
Aggregates
3 Aggregate Impact Value 24% (Max) 18% proposed to
be used for
4 Water absorption Value 2% (Max) 0.9% BC conforms
5 Coating and Stripping of Bitumen Minimum Retained No Stripping to MORT
Aggregate to Mixtures Coating 95% &H
specification
3. ANALYSIS CONDUCTED BY ROTHFUCH's METHOD
A 12.5mm & Down Size 63% NOTE: Mix proportion given is for
the sample aggregates Supplied. Any
B 6mm & Down Size 35% Minor Mixing percentage shall be
altered during production of BC Mix
C Mineral Filler (Cement) 2% to ensure graded mix conforming to
PROJECT MANAGEMENT 6 CONSULTANCY SERVICES
SPECIFIED RESULTS AS PER TEST SPECIFIED

IS SEIVE GRADATIO Test 1 Test 2 GRADATION
(RANGE) (RANGE) as
(mm) as per cumulative % by wt ...,oftotal obtained by
MORTH aggregate passing
Rothfuch's Method
1 2 3 4 5
19.0 mm 100 100 100 100
13.20 mm 79 - 100 93 94 72 - 100
9.50 mm 70 - 88 76 74 64 -94
4.75 mm 53 - 71 65 63 48 - 76
2.36 mm 42 - 58 50 45 38-62
1.18 mm 34 -48 40 36 31 -51
0.6 mm 26-38 29 30 22 - 42
0.3 mm 18 - 28 24 21 15 -31
0.15 mm 12-20 14 15 9-23
0.075 mm 4 - 10 6 4 2.5 - 11.5
4 BITUMEN CONTENT
5.5 % minimum binder content shall be ensured during production of BC mix material.
5. DEGREE OF COMPACTION TO BE ACHIEVED IN THE FIELD
Degree of compaction in the field should be minimum 2.35 glcc
6. BITUMEN TEST (60170 GRADE BITUMEN TO BE USED)
SL.NO TEST REQUIREMENT AS PER RESULT AS PER REMARKS

TEST AS PER IS 73-1992 PER TEST
1 Ductility Should be min of 75 cms 90 cms Bitumen sample
conforming to
2 Softening Between 45OC to 55OC 48' C 60170 grade as per
Point to IS 73:1992
specification
3 Flash Point Should be min of 175 O C 240' c requirement.
4 Penetration Should be Less than division 66.67

of 11100' in 5 seconds
(0. lmm , 100 gms)
MECADEZCORETECHNOLOGIES
PRIVATELIMITED
PROJECTMANA6EMENTd CONSULTANCY SERVICES
7 RESULT OF MARSHALL STABILITY TEST FOR BITUMINOUS CONCRETE (BC)
SL.NO PROPERTIES REQUIREMENT as RESULT AS PER

per MORTH TEST
1. Marshall Stability value at 60' c in Kgs 900 '1 195kgs
2. Flow Value (mm) 2-4mm 3.1
3. Percent Air Voids 3-6 4
4. Percent voids in mineral aggregate (VMA) 11 - 13 12
5. Percent Voids filled with Bitumen (VFB) 65 - 75 70
6. Bitumen Binder content in mix (% by wt., 5.5% (minimum) 5.5%
of total mix )
7. Degree of Compaction to be achieved 2.35 2.38 g d c c
(gdcc)
8 MANUFACTURING AND ROLLING TEMPERATURE FOR BITUMINOUS CONCRETE (BC)
NOTE; 60170 Grade Bitumen to be used.
Tes ecadez Core Technologies Private Limited.,
Mecadez Core Technologies Pvt. Ltd., Client Representative Contractor Representative

SHEET
F'roject Management and Consultancy Services
Summary of Frequencies of Field Tests and Lab Tests Conducted
Improvements and Asphalting t o Hosur road from Lalbagh North

Name of the work:
Gate to Dairy circle
Job No: MCTPL/BBMP/RI-S/Pnac/ 1 3 - 1 4 / R W / 0 9
I I 1 Bituminous Concrete
- . lBCI
- -- - - -
.--. I
1 Sl. No lParticulars of the t e s t s
1 /Quality of Binder
Quantity Frequency of
- --....
, 'rn-*a
2 Test / lot
Tests Required
I
2
Tests Carried
m--&
1V U C
2
2 IRate of Spread of Tack Coat/ Prime Coat 3 Test / Day I
6 6
3 Aggregate Impact Value 1 Test / 350 m3 I
I
4 Combined Flakiness 86 Elongation Indices
I
5 Aggregate Stripping Value
I I
11 Test / 400 m3 I
+filG 076Mix 3 Tests / Day
Blnder content and M u Gradahon 2 Tests / Day
10 Control of Temperature Regular
Intervals
I I I
11 1 Density of Compacted Layer one test/700m2 I
ASSISTANT ENGI EXECUTIVE

ENGINEER
Assistvlt Executive Engineer

Rs~adInh.astructure - South
amhat h g d o r e Mahanag- ~ i k e
PROJECT MANAGEMENT 6 CONSULTAW SERVICES
Test Report
Quality of Bitumen
Project Name Improvements and Asphalting to Hosur road from Lalbagh North Gate
to Dairy circle
Job NO MCTPL/BBMP/RI-S/PMC/ 13- 14/RW/09
Mix Type Bituminous Concrete IBC)
-
Test Method IS : 73 - 1992 & Specification for Road & Bridge Works, MORT&H,
Grade of Bitumen 60
-- ,/ 70
- -
Location Hot Mix Plant
Material Bitumen
Sample No 1
Date 2-Jan-20 15
I Require 1
S1. No. Description
1 Test 1 ment as /
1992
1 Penetration at 2 5 ' ~, 1 / 10 mm 65 60-70
2 Softening Point, (OC) 54 45-55
Min.
3 Specific Gravity 1.1 0.97
4 Ductility at 2 7 ' ~ , in cm 80 Min. 75
pp
5
1 Hash Point, tc) 184 Min. 175
Note:
...
111. This test report should not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of this laboratory.
PROJECT MANAMMENT6 CONSULTANCY SERVItES
Test Report
Quality of Bitumen
/project Name 1 Improvements and Asphalting to Hosur road from Lalbagh North Gate /
to Dairy circle
Job NO MCTPLJBBMPJRI-S/PMC/ 13- 14/RW/09
Mix Type
.- l~ituminousConcrete lBCl
, , 1
Test Method IS : 73 - 1992 & Specification for Road & Bridge Works, MORT&H,
Grade of Bitumen 60 / 70
Location Hot Mix Plant
Material Bitumen
Sample No 2
Date 2-Jan-20 15
I Require /
S1. No. Test ment as
Description per
Results
IS:73 -
1992
1 Penetration at 2 5 ' ~, 1 / 10 mm 68 60-70
2 Softening Point, (OC) 54 45-55
Min.
3 Specific Gravity 1.1 0.97
4 Ductility at 2 7 ' ~ ,in cm 80 Min. 75
1 5 1 Flash Point, PC) 1 180 / Min. 1751

--
Note:
ry regarding the report must be reported immediately.
For hnologies Private Limited
PRIVATE LIMITED
PROJECT MANAGEMENT 6 CONSULTANN SERVICES ,
Test Report
Rate of Spread of Tack Coat
Project Name Improvements and Asphalting to Hosur road from Lalbagh North Gate to Dairy
circle
I
Job No I MCTPL/BBMP/RI-S/PMC/ 1 3 - 1 4 / ~ ~ / 0 9
1 Mix Type .- (I ~ i t u m i n o uConcrete
s (BC)
. . 1
Contractor /K.R.I.D.L
-
Location At Site
Material Bitumen
Sample No 1
81. No. Determination Unit Test No 1

Longitudinal Distribution
I
I
1 1 Size of Plate (rnxn) / m2 1 0.2x0.2 / 0.2x0.2 1 0 2 x 0 2 1
I
2 Area of the Plate (a) m2 0.04
3
Initial weight of the empty Plate
kg 1 1.641 1.641 1.641 1
1
(b)
Final weight of plate after
4 kg 1.653 1 . 6 5 1 1.653
application of Tack Coat (c)
Weight of Prime coat/ Tack Coat
(d = C-b) kg 0.012 0.01 0.0 12
Rate of spread (d/a) pp
kg / m2 0.300 1 0.250 / 0.300
7 Average kg / m2 0.283
8 Specified Limit kg / m2 Not less than 0.25 kg / m2
Results: Rate of Spread of Prime Coat / Tack Coat is: 0.283 kg / m2
Note:
iii. This test report should not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of this lhboratory.
a
the report must be reported immediately.
n fl N h I
MECADEZ CORE TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE LIMITED ,
PROJECTMANAQMENT 6 CONSULTANN SERVICES I
Test Report
pyame
1
Improvements and Asphalting to Hosur road from Lalbagh North Gate to Dairy
circle
The Executive Engineer, Road Infrastructure, South Division, BBMP
1
,
I
Job No 1 MCTPL/BBMP/RI-S/PMC/ 13-1 4 / ~ ~ / 0 9

1
Mix Type /BituminousConcrete (BC)

Location At Site
Material Bitumen
1 Sample No 12 I
Test No 1
S1. No. Determination Unit
1 Size of Plate (mxn) m2 I 0.2x0.2 I 0 2 x 0 2 / 0 2 x 0 2
Area of the Plate (a)
fbl 1 kg / 1641 1.6411.641
4 1 Final weight of plate after 1 1.652 1.65 1.652
I application of Tack Coat (c) 1 kg
(d = C-b)
/ kg 1 0.011 1 0.009 / 0.011 1
Rate of spread (d/a)
8 Specified Limit kg / m2 Not less than 0.25 kg /-m2
Note:
the report must be reported immediately.
Private
PROJECT MANAQMENT 6 CONSULTANCY SERVICES
Test Report
circle
IClient
Mix Type Bituminous Concrete (BC)

1 Location I A ~ Site I
1 Material 1 Bitumen I
Sample No 3
Date 7-Jan-20 15
81. No. Test No 1

Determination Unit
Size of Plate (mxn)
Area of the Plate (a)
(b)
6
7
8
(d = c-b )
Rate of spread (d/a)
Average
Specified Limit
kg / m2
kg / m2
1 0.275 1
0.292
0.25
Not less than 0.25 kg / m

1 0.:
kg / m2
Note:
arding the report must be reported immediately.
Technologies Private Limited
PRIVATELIMITED
MECADEZCORETECHNOLOGIES I
PROJECT MANAGEMENT 6 CONSULTANCY SERYICES ,
Test Report
circle
r Client
Job NO
MCTPL/BBMP/RI-S/PMC/ 13-141RW/09
Location I
At Site
Material 1 Bitumen
Sample No 4
Date 8-Jan-2015
Test No 1
Sl. No. Determination Unit
I 1 1 Size of Plate (mxn) I m2 / 0.2x0.2 / 0.2x0.2 I 0 2 x 0 2
I 2 Area of the Plate (a) m2 0.04 0.04 0.04
(b)
/ kg 1 1.641 1 1.641 1 1.641

4 kg 1.653 1.651 1.651
(d = c-b )
1 kg 1 0.012 1 0.01 0.01
6 Rate of spread (d/a) kg / m2 0.300 / 0.250 1 0.250

Note:
i. This test report should not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of this laboratory.
ding the report must be reported immediately.
Technologies Private Limited A
PROJECT MANAQMENT6 CONSULTANCY SERVICES
Test Report I
circle
Job NO MCTPL/BBMP/RI-S/PMC/ 13-14/RW/09

I contractor
I
IK.R.I.D.L
I
Location I ~t Site
Test No 1
S1. No. Determination Unit
1 1 I Size of Plate (mxn) I m2 I 02x02 I
0 2 x 0 2 0.2x0.2 I I
1 Area of the Plate (a)
(b)
1 kg 1 1.641 1.641 1 1.641
1
application of Tack Coat (c) 1 kg 1.651 1.653 1.655 1
(d = C-b)
I kg / 0.01 1 0.012 / 0.014 1
6 Rate of spread (d/a) kg / m2 0.250 1 0.300 1 0.350 1
Note:
PRIVATE LIMITED
PROJECT TUANAMYENT & CONSJLTANCY SERVICES
1
, ,
Test Report
circle
I
Job No I MCTPL/BBMP/RI-S/PMC/ 13-14/RW/09
Location --
At Site
Material Bitumen
Sample No 6
S1. No. Determination Unit Test No 1

1 Size of Plate (rnxn) m2 0.2x0.2 0.2x0.2 0.2x0.2
pppp
2 Area of the Plate (a) m2 0.04 0.04 0.04
1 1
I

/ kg 1 1.641 1.641 1.641
4 Final weight of plate after

I
1 kg 1.654 1 1.652 1.65
Id = C-bI
1 kg 1 0.013 1 0.011 1 0.009
1 6 1 Rate of spread (d/a) I kg / m2 1 0.325 / 0.275 1 0.225

7 Average 1 kg 1 m2 1 0.275
Specified Limit 1 kg / m2 Not less than 0.25 kg / m2 1
Note:
iv. ing the report must be reported immediately.
For echnologies Private Limited
PRIVATE LIMITED
PROJECT MANAQMENT & CONSULTAW SERVICES
Test Report
Aggregate Impact Value
Project Name Improvements and Asphalting to Hosur road from Lalbagh North
r
Gate to Dairy circle
Job NO MCTPL/BBMP/RI-S/PMC/ 13-14/RW/09

Test Method IS : 2386 (Part - 4) 1963 & Specification for Road & Bridge Works,
MORT&H, Rev. V.
Location At Site
Material Coarse Aggregate
Sample No 1
1 S1. No. Determination / unit =rails

Weight of empty cylinder, wl 1 gm
Weight of container filled with
Aggregate, w2
Weight of the Aggregate before
1 gm !
compaction, (w2 - wl) = w3 P
Weight of the sample passing

through 2.36 mm IS sieves after 1 gm I
Impact, w4 I I
Weight of the sample retained on
2.36 mm IS sieve after Impact, Em 26 1
w5
Aggregate Impact Value (w4 / w3
)xlOO
% / 1 23.24 1 23.46 1
I 7 1 S~ecifiedLimit 1 % 1 24
Results: Average Aggregate Impact Value: 23.35 %
0 Note:
i. The results indicated above are based on the tests carried out on the sample a t site.
iii. This test report should not be reproduced except in full, without written approval
of this laboratory.
iv. A.
- - g the report must be reported immediately.
For :)~93t$ -
Technologies Private Limited
1
Authorised Signature Road Xairastralcture - Soath

MECADEZCORETECHNOLOGIESPRIVATELIMITED
PROJECT MANAGEMENT 6 CONSULTANCV SERVICES
Test Report
m r e ~ a t Impact
e Value
to Dairy circle
1 Client he Executive Engineer, Road Infrastructure, South Division, BBMP 1
Job NO MCTPLJBBMPJRI-S/PMC/ 13- 14/RW/09
I ~gpe / ~ i t u m i n o u sConcrete (BC) 1
l Contractor IK.R.I.D.L I
Test Method IS : 2386 (Part - 4) 1963 & Specification for Road & Bridge Works,
MORT&H, Rev. V.
Location At Site
Sample No I
2
Date 16- an-2015
S1. No. Determination 1 Unit 1 Trails

1 1 Weight of empty cylinder, w l 1 P 960 1 960
Weight of container filled with
Aggregate, w2
1 gm 1 1305 1306 1
1
I

3 gm 345 346
compaction, (w2 - w l ) = w3 ! I

through 2.36 mm IS sieves after gm 77
I
Impact, w4
2.36 mm IS sieve after Impact, Em 268 268
w5
)x100
% 1 1 22.32 1 22.54 1
7 Specified Limit % 24
Results: Average Aggregate Impact Value: 22.43 %
Note:
i. The results indicated above are based on the tests carried out on the sample a t site.
'
iii. This test report should not be reproduced except in full, without written approval
of this laboratory.
g the report must be reported immediately.
Technologies Priv
Road Imfrastrueture - South
PRIVATELIMITED
MECADEZCORETECHNOLOGIES j
PROJECT MANAGEMENT 4 CONSULTANCI SERVICES I
Test Report
m e g a- t e Impact Value
. to Dairy circle
I
Job NO MCTPLJBBMPJRI-S/PMC/13-14/RW/09
0
Mix T Y P ~ Bituminous Concrete (BC)
0 Contractor K.R.1.D.L
0 Test Method IS : 2386 (Part - 4) 1963 & Specification for Road & Bridge Works,
MORT&H, Rev. V.
0 Location At Site
0 Sample No 3
0 Date 7-Jan-20 15
0
S1. No. Determination Unit Trails
0
1 Weight of empty cylinder, wl gm 960 960
0 Weight of container filled with
2 W 1310 1311
Aggregate, w2
0
3 gm 350 35 1
0 compaction, (w2 - wl) = w3
0 4
through 2.36 mm IS sieves after gm 75 76
0 Impact, w4
0 5 2.36 mm IS sieve after Impact, gm 275
0 w5
275 I
6 % 21.43 21.65
0 )xlOO
7 Specified Limit % 24
0 Results: Average Aggregate Impact Value: 21.54 %
0 Note:
1 The results mdicated above are based on the tests camed out on the sample a t site
0 n The results relate only to the items tested
0 m Thls test report should not be reproduced except m full, wthout wntten approval
of this laboratory.
0 g the report must be reported ~mmediately
0
0
0 Authorised Signature
0

Test Report Field Density Test Sand Replacement Method: Project Name

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Test Report Field Density Test Sand Replacement Method: Project Name

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Test Report Field Density Test Sand Replacement Method: Project Name

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

MECADEZ CORE TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE LIMITED

PROJECT MANA6EMENT 6 C O N S U L T A W SERVICES

Client The Executive Engineer, Road Infrastructure, South Division, BBMP

nologies Private Limited.

Test Report '

Field Density Test by Sand Replacement Method

Client The Executive Engineer, Road Infrastructure, South Division, BBMP

22 KA 51 B 4122 11.05 Yes Yes 130 119 65 50

Project Name Improvements a n d Asphalting t o H o s u r r o a d f r o m Lalbagh North G a t e t o

1. MATERIALS PROPOSED TO BE USED

I. Coarse Aggregate (A) 19.2mm & down Size

2. PHYSICAL REQUIREMENT OF COARSE AGGREGATE FOR

3. ANALYSIS CONDUCTED BY ROTHFUCH's METHOD

SPECIFIED RESULTS AS PER TEST SPECIFIED

5. DEGREE OF COMPACTION TO BE ACHIEVED IN THE FIELD

Degree of compaction in the field should be minimum 2.35 glcc

6. BITUMEN TEST (60170 GRADE BITUMEN TO BE USED)

SL.NO TEST REQUIREMENT AS PER RESULT AS PER REMARKS

4 Penetration Should be Less than division 66.67

7 RESULT OF MARSHALL STABILITY TEST FOR BITUMINOUS CONCRETE (BC)

SL.NO PROPERTIES REQUIREMENT as RESULT AS PER

8 MANUFACTURING AND ROLLING TEMPERATURE FOR BITUMINOUS CONCRETE (BC)

NOTE; 60170 Grade Bitumen to be used.

Tes ecadez Core Technologies Private Limited.,

Mecadez Core Technologies Pvt. Ltd., Client Representative Contractor Representative

Summary of Frequencies of Field Tests and Lab Tests Conducted

Improvements and Asphalting t o Hosur road from Lalbagh North

ASSISTANT ENGI EXECUTIVE

Assistvlt Executive Engineer

1 5 1 Flash Point, PC) 1 180 / Min. 1751

For hnologies Private Limited

81. No. Determination Unit Test No 1

2 Area of the Plate (a) m2 0.04

Results: Rate of Spread of Prime Coat / Tack Coat is: 0.283 kg / m2

PROJECTMANAQMENT 6 CONSULTANN SERVICES I

Job No 1 MCTPL/BBMP/RI-S/PMC/ 13-1 4 / ~ ~ / 0 9

Mix Type /BituminousConcrete (BC)

Results: Rate of Spread of Prime Coat / Tack Coat is: 0.258 kg / m2

Mix Type Bituminous Concrete (BC)

81. No. Test No 1

Not less than 0.25 kg / m

Results: Rate of Spread of Prime Coat / Tack Coat is: 0.292 kg / m2

Technologies Private Limited

Final weight of plate after

6 Rate of spread (d/a) kg / m2 0.300 / 0.250 1 0.250

Results: Rate of Spread of Prime Coat / Tack Coat is: 0.267 kg / m2

Technologies Private Limited A

Rate of Spread of Tack Coat

Job NO MCTPL/BBMP/RI-S/PMC/ 13-14/RW/09

Results: Rate of Spread of Prime Coat / Tack Coat is: 0.300 kg / m2

S1. No. Determination Unit Test No 1

2 Area of the Plate (a) m2 0.04 0.04 0.04

Initial weight of the empty Plate

4 Final weight of plate after

1 6 1 Rate of spread (d/a) I kg / m2 1 0.325 / 0.275 1 0.225

For echnologies Private Limited

Job NO MCTPL/BBMP/RI-S/PMC/ 13-14/RW/09

1 S1. No. Determination / unit =rails

Weight of the sample passing