018 - Eastern Broadcasting V Dans JR
018 - Eastern Broadcasting V Dans JR
018 - Eastern Broadcasting V Dans JR
Facts:
This petition was filed to compel the respondents to allow the reopening of Radio
Station DYRE which had been summarily closed on grounds of national security. It appears
from the records that the respondents' general charge of "inciting people to commit acts
of sedition" arose from the petitioner's shift towards what it stated was the coverage of
public events and the airing of programs geared towards public affairs.
Issue:
1. on a mere allegation that the radio station was used to incite people to sedition;
2. no hearing was held and not a bit of proof was submitted to establish a factual basis
for the closure;
3. The petitioner was not informed beforehand why administrative action which closed
the radio station was taken against it; and
4. No action was taken by the respondents to entertain a motion seeking the
reconsideration of the closure action.
Ruling:
On March 25, 1985, before the Court could promulgate a decision squarely passing
upon all the issues raised, the petitioner through its president, Mr. Rene G. Espina suddenly
filed a motion to withdraw or dismiss the petition alleging the following:
1. Petitioner Eastern Broadcasting Corporation has already sold its radio broadcasting station in favor
of Manuel B. Pastrana;
2. Respondent NTC granted to the said new owner the requisite license and franchise to operate the
said radio station and approve the sale; and
3. Petitioner has no longer any interest in said case, and the new owner, Manuel B. Pastrana is likewise
not interested in pursuing the case.
However, for the guidance of inferior courts and administrative tribunals exercising
quasi-judicial functions, the Court issues the following guidelines:
3. All forms of media, whether print or broadcast, are entitled to the broad protection
of the freedom of speech and expression clause. The test for limitations on
freedom of expression continues to be the clear and present danger rule — that
words are used in such circumstances and are of such a nature as to create a
clear and present danger that they will bring about the substantive evils that the
lawmaker has a right to prevent, In his Constitution of the Philippines (2nd Edition,
pp. 569-570)
4. The clear and present danger test, however, does not lend itself to a simplistic and
“all embracing” interpretation applicable to all utterances in all forums.
All forms of communication are entitled to the broad protection of the freedom
of expression clause. Necessarily, however, the freedom of television and radio
broadcasting is somewhat lesser in scope than the freedom accorded to
newspaper and print media.
Because:
d) On the other hand, the transistor radio is found everywhere. The television
set is also becoming universal. Their message may be simultaneously
received by a national or regional audience of listeners including the
indifferent or unwilling who happen to be within reach of a blaring radio or
television set.
e) The materials broadcast over the airwaves reach every person of every
age, persons of varying susceptibilities to persuasion, persons of different
I.Q.s and mental capabilities, persons whose reactions to inflammatory or
offensive speech would be difficult to monitor or predict. The impact of the
vibrant speech is forceful and immediate. Unlike readers of the printed
work, the radio audience has lesser opportunity to cogitate analyze, and
reject the utterance.
5. The clear and present danger test, therefore, must take the particular
circumstances of broadcast media into account. The supervision of radio stations-
whether by government or through self-regulation by the industry itself calls for
thoughtful, intelligent and sophisticated handling.
7. Broadcast stations deserve the special protection given to all forms of media by
the due process and freedom of expression clauses of the Constitution.