Icrp 128 PDF
Icrp 128 PDF
The data on effective dose shown in this report are calculated as specified in
Publication 60 (ICRP, 1991a). However, work is in progress to develop a new set
of dose coefficients calculated in accordance with the Publication 103 methodology
(ICRP, 2007).
The data are not intended for therapeutic applications of radionuclides. More
detailed and patient-speciEc dosimetry and dose planning should be applied for
therapeutic application of radionuclides.
The membership of Committee 2 during the period of preparation of this report was:
(2009–2013)
(2013–2017)
10
The membership of Committee 3 during the period of preparation of this report was:
(2009–2013)
(2013–2017)
The authors wish to thank the former ICRP Assistant Scientific Secretary Michiya
Sasaki, former ICRP Interns Ian Steadman, Taylor Whitter, Tudor Dragea, and
Robert Martin who contributed to the checking and editing at the early stage of
this publication.
11
13
EXM code (where EXM stands for ‘EXponential Modelling’) allows users to fit data
to one, two, or three exponential functions. The OLINDA/EXM code uses the same
technical basis (phantoms, organ masses, equations, relationships assumed, and
other details) as the MIRDOSE code and the RADAR system.
(5) Reference biokinetic and dosimetric models and reference data for workers and
members of the public exposed to radionuclides have been published by the
Commission, giving dose coefficients for intake of radionuclides by inhalation and
ingestion (ICRP, 1973, 1979, 1980, 1981, 1993, 1994, 1996, 2012).
(6) The Task Group has made extensive use of the information and material
available from these sources.
14
(7) Certain general principles were followed in establishing the list of radiophar-
maceuticals for inclusion in this report. A radiopharmaceutical that has been
described in the literature and proposed for use in humans was included if there is
evidence that it has been in, or is coming into, common use, provided that acceptable
and sufficient metabolic data for making absorbed dose calculations are available.
The list of radiopharmaceuticals covers not only those used in the practice of nuclear
medicine, but also some of those used in clinical research.
(8) It is important to note that the inclusion of a radiopharmaceutical in this
report does not imply any recommendation regarding its use. For this reason, the
amounts of administered radiopharmaceutical required for a particular investigation
are not given. The list is based on the judgement of the Task Group regarding their
past, present, or potential future application in nuclear medicine procedures. Data
relating to these substances were obtained from an extensive search of the literature.
Some information had been published in scientific journals covering subjects other
than nuclear medicine.
(9) Complete radionuclide and radiochemical purity is assumed in all absorbed
dose calculations.
15
(10) Absorbed doses are calculated for most organs and tissues (‘target organs and
tissues’). These absorbed doses may arise as a result of radioactive decay occurring in
other regions (‘source regions’). Thus, absorbed doses in a particular organ or tissue
are typically the sum of contributions from various sources, including the target
organ or tissue itself. Two groups of target organs and tissues are included in the
calculation of absorbed dose (Table 3.1):
. target organs and tissues for which the absorbed dose is always calculated
(Group 1); and
. other organs and tissues that receive significantly higher absorbed doses than
the average to the rest of the body, or which are of special interest in the
investigation (Group 2).
Table 3.1. Organs and tissues for which absorbed dose is calculated.
Group 1 Group 2
17
(11) The absorbed dose to organs and tissues not included in Table 3.1 can usually
be approximated by using the absorbed dose provided for ‘Other tissues’ (e.g.
muscle). The absorbed doses given in the annexes are the mean absorbed doses to
an organ or region. In general, these mean absorbed doses are calculated assuming
uniform distribution of the radionuclide in the source regions.
(12) An exception to the assumption of a uniform dose distribution is made for the
kidneys, where a non-uniform distribution of radionuclides may be taken into
account. However, even in this case, absorbed doses to other organs and tissues
are calculated under the assumption that the radionuclide is distributed uniformly
throughout both kidneys; this is justified because, in practice, use of a non-uniform
distribution when calculating the absorbed doses to other organs and tissues results
in very small changes (<10%) in the results obtained.
(13) Discussions were held regarding whether or not to calculate doses to regions
of the brain that will receive doses considerably higher than the average dose, such as
the putamen and nucleus caudatus from 123I-labelled FP-CIT. As S values for the
calculation of regional doses in this case have been published (Bouchet et al., 1999),
the decision was made to include the absorbed dose to the region of the brain that
receives the highest absorbed dose as a footnote to the dose table. However, this dose
is not used in calculation of the effective dose for these radiopharmaceuticals. It is
important to stress that the doses are small; even if the central regions of the brain
receive doses 10 times higher than average, this is still below levels at which known
deterministic effects (‘tissue reactions’) can be observed.
(14) The lens of the eye is considered as a tissue at risk in Publication 60 (ICRP,
1991a) because of the possibility of inducing opacities that may interfere with vision.
The radionuclides in radiopharmaceuticals currently used in nuclear medicine do not
concentrate in the tissues of the healthy human eye, with the possible exception of
iodo-amphetamine which is used in the synthesis of melanin (Winchell et al., 1980).
For this reason, the lens of the eye is not included in the list of target organs and
tissues.
18
(15) The Task Group encountered several problems in finding good biokinetic
information from measurements on man. In general, published data are scarce,
especially with regard to quantitative measurements. The clinician is often only
interested in the initial distribution and metabolism of a test substance, whereas
for dosimetry calculations, long-term retention is of prime importance.
(16) The Task Group wishes to repeat the requests most recently made in
Publication 106 (ICRP, 2008) for securing the maximum information possible
from any investigation that involves radiopharmaceuticals. The information
needed for dose calculations includes fractional long-term retention of radionuclides
and labelled compounds, turnover of the radiopharmaceutical and its metabolites,
fractional gastrointestinal absorption values for orally administered compounds,
distribution of radionuclides within different organs, and their excretion pathways.
Collection of such data should be encouraged by professional and scientific societies
and by regulatory authorities, and data should be made available by publication and
storage in accessible databases. The editors and referees of scientific journals are
encouraged to request such information in papers on new, as well as commonly
administered, radiopharmaceuticals.
(17) For each radioactive compound, the Task Group has agreed upon a bioki-
netic model giving quantitative estimates for the distribution and metabolism of the
radiopharmaceutical in the body. The literature on which each model is based is
referenced. In appropriate cases, the range of pathological variation expected in the
metabolic data is also indicated.
(18) Some biokinetic models have been developed within a generic framework for
application to a class of radiopharmaceutical (e.g. monoclonal antibodies and brain
receptor substances). Each of the generic model frameworks is a compromise
between biological realism and practical considerations regarding the amount and
quality of information that is available to determine parameter values for specific
compounds.
(19) A realistic maximum model (assuming no biological elimination) have been
developed for substances labelled with 11C.
(20) For absorbed dose calculations, knowledge of the time–activity curve in
different organs and tissues of the body after administration of a radiopharmaceu-
tical is needed. The best way to get this information is by pharmacokinetic analysis,
which includes knowledge about mechanisms affecting radionuclide localisation and
physiological assumptions regarding its behaviour in body tissues. On the basis of
this knowledge, a biokinetic model is defined, delineating the detailed distribution
and flow, or transfer, of the radionuclide.
(21) This biokinetic model, in turn, allows the derivation of a mathematical model,
consisting of differential and/or integral equations for the variation with time of the
amounts of radionuclide in different parts of the body. The model may be either
compartmental or non-compartmental. Knowledge of the values for compartment
sizes, flow rates, and other physiological parameters allows numerical solution of the
19
equations, giving activity–time relationships for all parts of the system which are
then integrated to obtain the cumulated activities needed for calculations of
absorbed dose.
(22) The method outlined above could, in principle, be applied to derive absorbed
doses in those disease states leading to quantitative changes in normal physiological
processes. However, this is not generally possible because, with some exceptions,
there is insufficient information to define a complete model including all pools or
compartments, as well as flow rates in or out of the system and between the parts of
the system. For absorbed dose calculations, only the time–activity curves are needed;
these can be established in alternative ways, as discussed in detail in ICRU Reports
32 and 67 (ICRU, 1979, 2002), the MIRD primer (Loevinger et al., 1991) and the
MIRD Pamphlet 21 (Bolch et al., 2009).
(23) For example, a simple approach involves modification of the bone dose in
younger individuals in whom bone growth is assumed to result in higher uptakes and
thus doses. In these tissues, the absorbed dose may be approximately two to five
times higher for 99mTc-phosphonates (Gelfand et al., 1983; Kaul et al., 1985) com-
pared with the mean absorbed dose to the bone surfaces, which is the target tissue
considered in this report. Similar ratios can be derived for 67Ga-citrate from data
reported by Gelfand et al. (1983). Thus, in these cases, the use of the same biokinetic
model for both children and adults would underestimate radiation doses to a parti-
cular part of the skeleton, although the mean absorbed dose to bone surfaces is not
likely to be underestimated substantially. In calculations of absorbed doses to chil-
dren, age-dependent data are used for organ mass, blood distribution, and S values.
(24) The influence of pathological changes on absorbed dose has also been studied.
Variations of absorbed dose in disease states can generally be calculated using the
same model as for the healthy state, but with appropriate data for organ or tissue
mass, uptake, and retention. Separate absorbed dose estimates are presented in cases
where such variations lead to significant changes in these absorbed doses.
(25) The models and absorbed dose values presented are intended for use in
diagnostic nuclear medicine and clinical research with radionuclides, and should
not be used in radionuclide therapy.
(26) Some radiopharmaceuticals administered to breast-feeding women may be
excreted in the breast milk and thus transferred to the breast-fed child. This problem
is covered in Annex D of this report. Excretion in breast milk in connection with
occupational exposure is covered in Publication 95 (ICRP, 2004).
(27) In the case of radionuclides such as 67Ga, 111In, 125I, and 201Tl, administered
in forms that result in their uptake in cell nuclei, the minor fraction of the energy
carried by Auger electrons may have a disproportionately large effect due to their
very short range in tissue (Stepanek et al., 1996; Bingham et al., 2000; Taylor, 2000;
Kassis, 2004). The assumption made here, that the absorbed dose is distributed
uniformly within the cell, may result in underestimation of the risk.
(28) This problem has been discussed in earlier publications (ICRP, 1979, 1991a,
2003), and by many other authors (e.g. Hofer, 1996; Gardin et al., 1999; Bingham
et al., 2000; Feinendegen and Neumann, 2004). MIRD has given detailed advice and
20
presented S values for the cellular level (Goddu et al., 1994, 1997). Nonetheless, it is
still difficult to establish the intracellular distribution of the radionuclides of interest
so that such detailed S values can be used effectively.
(29) It is usually assumed that daughter radionuclides produced within the body
stay with, and behave metabolically like, their parent nuclide. This may be an over-
simplification in some cases, and if specific information to the contrary is available,
the dose estimates presented here should be modified appropriately.
(30) For some substances, such as iodine-labelled compounds, pertechnetate, and
some radiopharmaceuticals used for renal studies, blocking agents may be adminis-
tered before or simultaneously with the radiopharmaceutical (e.g. to induce compe-
titive inhibition of uptake in specific organs). In such circumstances, including
blocking of the thyroid, total inhibition of radionuclide uptake has been assumed,
although this may be difficult to achieve in practice.
(31) It is often possible to reduce the absorbed dose to a patient by increasing the
rate of elimination of the radionuclide from the body, for example by more frequent
emptying of the urinary bladder (with hydration, diuretics, and catheterisation), the
bowel (with laxatives and enemas), and the gallbladder (with a meal of high fat
content and cholecystokinin).
21
(33) Several methods of calculating the absorbed dose to an organ from radio-
active sources in the same organ and in other organs have been proposed and used.
For a review of these methods, the reader is referred to ICRU Reports 32 and 67
(ICRU, 1979, 2002), Publication 30 (ICRP, 1979), and NCRP Report 84 (NCRP,
1985). The most common method currently in use in nuclear medicine was originally
developed from an approach by Loevinger and Berman (1968), using tabulated data
on absorbed fractions of energy in a target tissue from a specific source region
(Snyder et al., 1969; Loevinger et al., 1991). This method was later improved by
Snyder et al. (1975) who introduced the ‘S value’, which also contains all necessary
physical information for a specific radionuclide.
(34) With this more straightforward method, the absorbed dose in T from a radio-
nuclide in a single source organ S is given by:
where MT is the mass of the target organ or tissue (see Table A.1), Ei is the mean
energy of radiation type i, Yi is the yield of radiation type i per transformation, ’i is
23
the absorbed fraction of energy of radiation type i, and c is a constant, the value of
which depends on the units of the included quantities (for E in joules, MT in kg, and
c ¼ 1, the absorbed dose per transformation, S, will be in gray).
where AS(u) is the activity at time u in the source organ or tissue considered. Due to
the relatively short physical half-life of radionuclides used in nuclear medicine, the
upper integration limit, t, can be taken as infinity.
(39) Although the mechanisms by which radionuclides are distributed within, or
excreted from, the body are not necessarily well represented by first-order kinetic
models, such models are generally adequate for representing overall uptake
and retention of radionuclides in individual organs and tissues. As this is all that
is required for dosimetric calculations, these models are used extensively in this
report.
(40) A general first-order kinetic model can be represented as a system of n com-
partments, interlinked with constant rate coefficients. In such a system, the rate of
change of the amount of material (qi) in compartment i is given by:
dqi Xn
¼ ii qi ðtÞ p qi ðtÞ þ ij qj ðtÞ ð5:5Þ
dt j¼1
j6¼i
where ii is the fraction of the amount of material in compartment i leaving per unit
time, ij is the fraction of the amount of material in compartment j flowing to
compartment i per unit time, and p is the radioactive decay constant, as
appropriate.
(41) A direct correspondence between compartments and anatomical regions of
the body does not usually exist. However, for absorbed dose calculations, it is
necessary to know the amount of substance in different regions of the body.
Therefore, for practical reasons, specific organs and tissues are considered instead
24
X
n
AS ðtÞ ¼ ki eði þp Þt ð5:6Þ
i¼1
nX Xn
A~ S þm
Ti lnð2Þ lnð2Þ
¼ FS aj ai exp t exp t ð5:7Þ
A0 j¼nþ1 i¼1
Ti Tj Ti,eff Tj,eff
where FS is the fractional distribution to organ or tissue S (i.e. the fraction of the
administered substance that would arrive in source organ or tissue S over all time if
there were no radioactive decay), ai is the fraction of FS eliminated with a biological
half-time Ti ( ai ¼ 1), aj is the fraction of FS taken up with a biological half-time Tj
(marked by a minus sign in the biokinetic data tables) ( aj ¼ 1), n is the number of
elimination components, m is the number of uptake components, and Tj,eff and Ti,eff
are the elimination and uptake effective half-times, respectively. Eq. (5.7) is, under
certain constraints, a solution to Eq. (5.5).
(43) The effective half-time can be calculated from the corresponding biological
half-time Ti and the functional physical half-life Tp:
1 1 1
¼ þ ð5:8Þ
Ti,eff Ti Tp
(44) Eq. (5.7) describes the build-up and subsequent decline of activity. If Ti ¼ Tj
for some combination of i and j, the corresponding term in the sum in Eq. (5.7)
becomes:
lnð2Þ lnð2Þ
ai t exp t ð5:9Þ
Ti Ti,eff
(45) A special case, which often occurs, is that immediate uptake in the organ is
assumed. Eq. (5.7) then reduces to:
Xn
AS ðtÞ lnð2Þ
¼ FS ai exp t ð5:10Þ
A0 i¼1
Ti,eff
25
Integrating Eq. (5.7) over time up to infinity gives the normalised cumulated
activity:
nX Xn
A~ S þm
Ti Ti,eff Tj,eff
¼ FS aj ai ð5:11Þ
A0 j¼nþ1 i¼1
Ti Tj lnð2Þ lnð2Þ
A~ S Xn
Ti,eff
¼ FS ai ð5:12Þ
A0 i¼1
lnð2Þ
26
27
where DT,R is the mean absorbed dose from radiation R in tissue or organ T, and wR
is the radiation weighting factor. For all types of radiation used in diagnostic nuclear
medicine, wR equals 1 (even if this value may not be appropriate for Auger emitters
incorporated into DNA).
(52) To reflect the combined detriment from stochastic effects due to the equiva-
lent doses in all the organs and tissues of the body, the equivalent dose in each organ
and tissue is multiplied by a tissue weighting factor, and the results are summed over
the whole body to give the effective dose. The special name for the SI unit for
effective dose is the sievert (Sv).
(53) The effective dose was developed primarily for radiation protection of
occupationally exposed persons (ICRP, 1977, 1991a). It attributes weighting fac-
tors wT to organs or tissues, representing the fraction of the total stochastic risk
(i.e. fatal cancer and serious inherited disorders) resulting from the irradiation of
that organ or tissue T when the whole body is irradiated uniformly. The effective
dose is calculated by adding the weighted organ or tissue mean dose equivalents,
HT, i.e.:
X
E¼ w T HT ð6:2Þ
T
where E is the effective dose, wT is the relative radiation sensitivity of organ or tissue
T (see Table 6.1), and HT is the mean equivalent dose in target organ or tissue T. For
radionuclides used in diagnostic nuclear medicine, the effective dose is numerically
equal to that of the mean absorbed dose as the radiation weighting factor wR is taken
as unity for these radionuclides.
(54) If the body is irradiated uniformly, all the HT values are the same and the
equivalent dose at any point in the body is numerically equal to the effective dose.
(55) The weighting factors used in computing this quantity are applied both to
workers and the general population.
29
Tissue wT
Gonads 0.20
Colon 0.12
Lung 0.12
Red marrow 0.12
Stomach 0.12
Bladder 0.05
Breast 0.05
Liver 0.05
Oesophagus 0.05
Thyroid 0.05
Skin 0.01
Bone surfaces 0.01
Remainder* 0.05
*Adrenals, brain, upper large intestine, small intestine, kidney, muscle,
pancreas, spleen, thymus, and uterus.
(56) The Commission has issued its 2007 Recommendations (ICRP, 2007), super-
seding the 1990 Recommendations (ICRP, 1991a) with updated and amended tissue
weighting factors (and radiation weighting factors). Currently, work is in progress
within ICRP to generate correspondingly updated dose coefficients for the calcula-
tion of doses to workers and members of the public due to intake of radioactive
substances. In due course, doses to patients from intake of radiopharmaceuticals will
also be calculated. However, pending the availability of such updated information,
the present data should be used.
(57) Effective dose can be of practical value for comparing doses related to sto-
chastic effects from: different diagnostic examinations and interventional procedures;
the use of similar technologies and procedures in different hospitals and countries;
and the use of different technologies for the same medical examination, provided that
the representative patients or patient populations for which the effective doses are
derived are similar with regard to age and gender. However, comparisons of effective
doses may be inappropriate when there are significant dissimilarities between the age
and gender distributions of the representative patients or patient populations being
compared (e.g. children, all females, elderly populations), and the Commission’s
reference distribution of both genders and all ages. This is a consequence of the
fact that the magnitudes of risk for stochastic effects are dependent on age and
gender.
30
(58) Effective dose should not be used to assess risks of stochastic effects in retro-
spective situations for exposures in identified individuals, nor should it be used in
epidemiological evaluations of human exposure.
(59) Risk assessment for medical uses of ionising radiation is best evaluated using
appropriate risk values for the individual tissues at risk, and for the age and gender
distribution of the population groups undergoing the medical procedures.
(60) For the exposure of young children, the risk would be higher, perhaps by a
factor of two or three (ICRP, 1991a, Annex C). For many common types of diag-
nostic examination, the higher risk will be offset by the reduction in administered
activity relative to that to an adult. For an age at exposure of approximately 60
years, the risk would be lower, perhaps by a factor of three. At higher ages at
exposure, the risks are even less (ICRP, 1991a, Annex C). The specific demographics
of the medically exposed population present obstacles to applying the concept of
effective dose as a tool for comparing doses from medical irradiation with other
sources of exposure to humans.
where HULI and HLLI are the equivalent doses in the walls of the ULI and LLI,
respectively.
(63) The biokinetic model presented here contains no information on uptake and
retention of radionuclides in the oesophagus. As the transit time of materials through
the oesophagus is normally quite rapid in comparison with the physical half-life, only
the absorbed dose from penetrating radiation emitted from other source regions is
considered. In the absence of absorbed fraction values for the oesophagus, the dose
to the thymus has been used previously as a surrogate (ICRP, 1991b), and this
method is used in the present report.
(64) The weighting factor for the remainder tissues, 0.05, is applied on the mass-
weighted average dose of those organs listed in the footnote of Table 6.1. In those
cases in which a single remainder tissue or organ receives an equivalent dose that
31
exceeds the dose to any other organ, a weighting factor of 0.025 should be applied to
that organ, and 0.025 to the average dose in the rest of the remainder tissues or
organs as defined above. This ‘rule’ may also apply for any other organ that is
recognised as radiation sensitive.
(65) As many radiopharmaceuticals are excreted rapidly in the urine, the absorbed
dose to the wall of the urinary bladder is often large compared with the absorbed
dose to other organs and tissues in the same study, and may contribute considerably
to the effective dose. In cases where the contribution is more than 50%, a note at the
foot of the dosimetry table states the actual contribution.
(66) The presence of chemical forms of the radionuclide other than that intended
may change the distribution and kinetics of the radionuclide. This may lead to a
different distribution of the absorbed dose.
(67) In this report, complete radiochemical purity has been assumed, unless other-
wise stated.
32
(68) The absorbed dose to the uterus, which is included in the dose tabulations,
may be used as a substitute for the absorbed dose to the embryo if the subject is in
the first 2–3 months of pregnancy. Similarly, the absorbed dose to the fetus from
radioactive substances without placental transfer is expected to be in the same range
as the dose to the uterus. For radioactive substances with placental transfer, the
absorbed dose to organs and tissues of the mother may, as a first approximation,
be taken as representative of the absorbed dose to the corresponding organs and
tissues of the fetus.
(69) More detailed radiation dose estimates for the fetus from administration of a
number of radiopharmaceuticals to women at various stages of pregnancy are given
by Russell et al. (1997). Their data illustrate that the majority of studies will probably
involve fetal doses <10 mGy. Only studies using 131I-iodide, 201Tl-chloride, and
67
Ga-citrate appear to result in fetal doses >10 mGy, according to present knowl-
edge. Therapeutic administrations are routinely contra-indicated in the case of preg-
nancy or breast feeding as this may result in very high fetal doses. In addition,
beyond 10–13 weeks of gestation, the fetal thyroid may receive extremely high
doses in cases of therapy using 131I-iodide (Watson et al., 1989; Berg et al., 1998).
For substances in their ionic form, a comprehensive compilation of doses to the
embryo and fetus is found in Publication 88 (ICRP, 2001).
33
35
ICRP, 1981. Limits for intakes of radionuclides by workers. ICRP Publication 30, Part 3.
Ann. ICRP 6(2/3).
ICRP, 1987. Radiation dose to patients from radiopharmaceuticals. ICRP Publication 53.
Ann. ICRP 18(1–4).
ICRP, 1991a. 1990 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological
Protection. ICRP Publication 60. Ann. ICRP 21(1–3).
ICRP, 1991b. Radiation dose to patients from radiopharmaceuticals. Addendum 1 to
Publication 53. ICRP Publication 62. Ann. ICRP 22(3).
ICRP, 1993. Age-dependent doses to members of the public from intake of radionuclides.
Part 2: ingestion dose coefficients. ICRP Publication 67. Ann. ICRP 23(3/4).
ICRP, 1994. Dose coefficients for intake of radionuclides by workers. ICRP Publication 68.
Ann. ICRP 24(4).
ICRP, 1996. Age-dependent doses to members of the public from intake of radionuclides. Part
5. ICRP Publication 72. Ann. ICRP 26(1).
ICRP, 1998. Radiation dose to patients from radiopharmaceuticals. Addendum 2 to ICRP
Publication 53. ICRP Publication 80. Ann. ICRP 28(3).
ICRP, 2001. Doses to the embryo and fetus from intake of radionuclides by the mother. ICRP
Publication 88. Ann. ICRP 31(1–3).
ICRP, 2003. Relative biological effectiveness (RBE), quality factor (Q), and radiation weight-
ing factor (wR). ICRP Publication 92. Ann. ICRP 33(4).
ICRP, 2004. Doses to infants from ingestion of radionuclides in mothers’ milk. ICRP
Publication 95. Ann. ICRP 34(3/4).
ICRP, 2007. The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological
Protection. ICRP Publication 103. Ann. ICRP 37(2/3).
ICRP, 2008. Radiation dose to patients from radiopharmaceuticals – addendum 3 to ICRP
Publication 53. ICRP Publication 106. Ann. ICRP 38 (1/2).
ICRP, 2012. Compendium of dose coefficients based on ICRP Publication 60. ICRP
Publication 119. Ann. ICRP 41(Suppl.).
ICRU, 1979. Methods of Assessment of Absorbed Dose in Clinical Use of Radionuclides.
ICRU Report 32. International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements,
Bethesda, MD.
ICRU, 2002. Absorbed-dose specification in nuclear medicine. ICRU Report 67. J. ICRU 2, 1–110.
Johansson, L., Mattsson, S., Nosslin, B., Leide-Svegborn, S., 1992. Effective dose from radio-
pharmaceuticals. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. 19, 933–938.
Jönsson, L., Ljungberg, M., Strand, S.E., 2005. Evaluation of accuracy in activity calculations
for the conjugate view method from Monte Carlo simulated scintillation camera images
using experimental data in an anthropomorphic phantom. J. Nucl. Med. 46, 1679–1686.
Kassis, A.M., 2004. The amazing world of Auger electrons. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 80, 789–903.
Kaul, A., Krauss, O., Petrausch, G., 1985. Strahlenexposition durch Tc-99m-
Methylendiphosphonat — lokale Dosisverteilung in Wachstum zonen des kindlichen
Skelett und Organdosen. In: Poretti, G. (Ed.), Medizinische Physik. Deutsche
Gesellschaft für Medizinische Physik, Bern.
Loevinger, R., Berman, M., 1968. A schema for absorbed-dose calculations for biologically
distributed radionuclides. MIRD Pamphlet No. 1. J. Nucl. Med. 9(Suppl. 1), 7–14.
Loevinger, R., Budinger, T.F., Watson, E.E., 1991. MIRD Primer for Absorbed Dose
Calculations. Revised edition. Society of Nuclear Medicine, New York, NY.
36
NCRP, 1982. Nuclear Medicine – Factors Influencing the Choice and Use of Radionuclides in
Diagnosis and Therapy. NCRP Report No. 70. National Council on Radiation Protection
and Measurements, Bethesda, MD.
NCRP, 1985. General Concepts for the Dosimetry of Internally Deposited Radionuclides.
NCRP Report No. 84. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements,
Bethesda, MD.
Norrgren, K., Svegborn, S.L., Areberg, J., Mattsson, S., 2003. Accuracy of the quantification of
organ acticity from planar gamma camera images. Cancer Biother. Radiopharm. 18, 125–131.
Roedler, H.D., 1980. Accuracy of Internal Dose Calculations with Special Consideration of
Radiopharmaceutical Biokinetics. Third International Radiopharmaceutical Dosimetry
Symposium, Oak Ridge, TN, USA, October 7–10, 1980. HHS Publication (FDA 81-
8166). Department of Health and Human Welfare, Bureau of Radiological Health,
Rockville, MD, USA, pp. 1–20.
Roedler, H.D., Kaul, A., 1976. Dose to Target Organs from Remaining Body Activity: Results of
the Formally Exact and Approximate Solution. In: Cloutier, R.J., Coffey, J.L., Snyder, W.S.,
Watson, E.E. (Eds.), Radiopharmaceutical Dosimetry Symposium, Oak Ridge, TN, USA,
April 26–29, 1976. HEW Publication (FDA 76-8044), Department of Health, Education and
Welfare, Bureau of Radiological Health, Rockville, MD, USA. pp. 155–163.
Roedler, H.D., Kaul, A., Hine, G.J., 1978. Internal Radiation Dose in Diagnostic Nuclear
Medicine. Hoffman, Berlin.
Russell, J.R., Stabin, M.G., Sparks, R.B., Watson, E.E., 1997. Radiation absorbed dose to the
embryo/fetus from radiopharmaceuticals. J. Nucl. Med. 73, 756–769.
Snyder, W.S., Ford, M.R., Warner, G.G., Watson, S.B., 1975. ‘S’ Absorbed Dose per Unit
Cumulated Activity for Selected Radionuclides and Organs. MIRD Pamphlet No. 11.
Society of Nuclear Medicine, New York, NY.
Snyder, W.S., Ford, M.R., Warner, G.G., 1978. Estimates of Specific Absorbed Fractions for
Photon Sources Uniformly Distributed in Various Organs of a Heterogeneous Phantom.
Medical Internal Radiation Dose Committee (NM/MIRD) Pamphlet No. 5, revised.
Society of Nuclear Medicine, New York, NY.
Snyder, W.S., Ford, M.R., Warner, G.G., Fisher, H.R. Jr, 1969. Estimates of absorbed frac-
tions for monoenergetic photon sources uniformly distributed in various organs of a het-
erogeneous phantom. MIRD Pamphlet No. 5. J. Nucl. Med. 10(Suppl. 3), 5–52.
Stabin, M.G., 1996. MIRDOSE: personal computer software for internal dose assessment in
nuclear medicine. J. Nucl. Med. 37, 538–546.
Stabin, M.G., Sparks, R.B., Crowe, E., 2005. OLINDA/EXM: the second-generation personal
computer software for internal dose assessment in nuclear medicine. J. Nucl. Med. 46,
1023–1027.
Stepanek, J., Larsson, B., Weinreich, R., 1996. Auger-electron spectra of radionuclides for
therapy and diagnostics. Acta Oncol. 35, 863–868.
Taylor, D.M., 2000. Subcellular distribution of gallium-67 and other Auger-emitting radio-
nuclides in human and animal tissues. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 92, 229–231.
Watson, E.E., Stabin, M.G., Eckerman, K.F., 1989. A model of the peritoneal cavity for use in
internal dosimetry. J. Nucl. Med. 30, 2002–2011.
Winchell, H.S., Horst, W.D., Braun, L., Oldendorf, W.H., Hattner, R., Parker, H., 1980.
N-isopropyl (123I)p-iodoamphetamine: single-pass brain uptake and washout; binding to
brain synaptosomes; and localisation in dog and monkey brain. J. Nucl. Med. 21, 947–952.
Zanzonico, P.B., 2000. Internal radionuclide radiation dosimetry: a review of basic concepts
and recent developments. J. Nucl. Med. 41, 297–308.
37
39
Table A.1. Masses (g) of models of selected organs and tissues at different ages.*
40
Table A.2. Adult values for blood content and blood flow in different organs.
41
Ingestion
Stomach (ST)
λST
λB
Small intestine (SI) Body fluids
λSI
Upper large
intestine (ULI)
Colon λULI
Lower large
intestine (LLI)
λLLI
Excretion
Fig. A.1. Compartment model used to describe the kinetics of radionuclides in the gastroin-
testinal tract.
Table A.3. Parameters used for calculating absorbed dose to the gastrointestinal tract.
42
dose to different parts of the gastrointestinal tract, depending upon the physical half-
life of the radionuclide. Absorbed doses for radionuclides with long half-lives will be
overestimated, and those for radionuclides with short half-lives will be underesti-
mated. For newborn babies, however, use of the same gastrointestinal transit time as
for adults is not recommended. For substances for which the dose is calculated for
newborn babies, further details about data for the transit time through the intestine
are given in the biokinetic model, where applicable.
(A7) A modified model is used for non-absorbable inert markers intended for
studying different aspects of the physiology of the gastrointestinal tract (e.g. gastric
emptying, intestinal transport and transit time, abnormal intestinal permeability,
etc.). These substances are usually labelled with 99mTc or 111In. Small quantities of
non-absorbable markers (i.e. up to a few percent) may be absorbed into the blood.
For the purposes of this report, the amounts absorbed are considered to have a
negligible effect on the dose calculations. The modification to the standard ICRP
model is that the gastric residence time is changed to 0.5 h for fluids and 1.5 h for
solids (ICRP, 2002, 2006).
X
n
ATB ¼ ai exp i þ p t ðA:1Þ
i¼1
1 expðp TK Þ X
n
i
A~ K ¼ fr ai ðA:2Þ
p i¼1
i þ p
43
where fr is the fraction of excreted activity that is eliminated through the kidneys,
and TK is the mean transit time through the kidneys appropriate for the given radio-
pharmaceutical and physiological status; unless otherwise stated, this is assumed to
be 5 min.
(A11) The expression is approximate as fr may differ for the individual compo-
nents of whole-body clearance. However, for practical application, this approxima-
tion is judged to be adequate. The cumulated activity in the kidneys given in the
biokinetic data tables for the individual substances is the sum of the cumulated
activity from the excretion process and a contribution from activity distributed uni-
formly in the remaining organs and tissues, which can include the kidneys.
(A12) The cumulated activity in bladder contents, A~ B , is given by:
X1
1 expðp tv Þ 1 expðði þ p Þtv Þ
A~ B ¼ fr ai
i¼1
p i þ p
ðA:3Þ
1
expðp TK Þ
1 expððp þ p Þtv Þ
where tv is the bladder filling and voiding interval, which for the purpose of the
present model is assumed to be constant and equal to 3.5 h for adults and
children aged 10 years; the average urinary cycle in humans (Syed, 1976). The
first voiding is assumed to occur at time tv after administration of the radio-
pharmaceutical to the patient. In the equations above, the effect of kidney resi-
dence time has been neglected as it is usually much shorter than the physical half-
life of the radionuclide; if this is not the case, this equation should be multiplied
by expðp TK Þ.
(A13) Calculating the radiation absorbed dose to the bladder wall involves
consideration of a complex relationship between urine flow rate, voiding period,
and urine volume initially present in the bladder when the radiopharmaceutical is
administered, and is critically dependent on the model used to describe the geome-
trical relationships between the wall of the bladder and its contents. Such a model
was developed by Snyder and Ford (1976) to investigate the effects of the above
physiological variables on absorbed dose to the bladder wall, and was extended by
Smith et al. (1982) to examine these effects for any radiopharmaceutical. The
MIRD Committee has published a dynamic bladder model (Thomas et al., 1999)
incorporating more physiologically realistic features providing for a varying blad-
der volume, varying initial content and voiding interval, and a night gap in the
voiding pattern.
(A14) Within the ranges of urine flow rate of 0.5–2 l/day, voiding period of 0.5–8 h,
and initial bladder contents of 0–300 ml, the predicted bladder wall dose varies over a
range of approximately 25 fold for radiopharmaceuticals that are cleared rapidly by
the renal system [e.g. 99mTc-labelled mercaptoacetyl triglycine (MAG3)], reducing to
a range of approximately five fold for substances that are cleared more slowly (e.g.
131
I-iodide). For voiding periods of 3.5 h, the bladder dose predicted by the
44
Table A.4. Parameters used for calculating absorbed dose to the urinary bladder wall.
simplified method used in this report lies within the spread of doses obtained using
the above ranges of parameter values, but may be as much as five times lower than
the highest values. As the voiding period decreases, the simple method leads to a
further underestimate of the dose, which, for a period of 0.5 h, may be of the order of
25 fold.
(A15) An age-related bladder voiding model is used. The voiding periods are based
on urinary production rates as described in Publication 89 (ICRP, 2002), and volume
of the content as described by Stabin and Siegel (2003). The voiding periods are
presented in Table A.4.
(A16) The S values used for calculation of the absorbed dose to the bladder wall
relate to the contents and the wall of the bladder as the source and target tissue,
respectively. It should be noted that the S values, which for electrons and beta
particles represent a surface dose to the bladder wall, are based on fixed average
bladder contents (Table A.4). These S values have been used in the present report in
conjunction with cumulated activities in the bladder contents estimated for an age-
dependent bladder voiding interval presented in Table A.4. This method does not
allow for the variation in dose rate to the wall as the bladder fills with urine contain-
ing radionuclides.
45
46
(A24) The distribution of activity thus follows the surface area or mass distribution
of mineral bone. For adults, the mass ratio cortical:trabecular bone, according to
Publication 89, is 80:20 and the surface area ratio is 40:60 (ICRP, 2002). As no
reference values for the distribution between cortical and trabecular bones for chil-
dren are available, and as the information on this matter in the open literature is very
scarce, the Task Group has also adopted these values for 15- and 10-year-old children.
For 5- and 1-year-old children, the mass ratio cortical:trabecular bone used for the
calculations is assumed to be 60:40 and the surface area ratio is assumed to be 30:70.
(A25) A few radiopharmaceuticals are concentrated to a significant extent in the
metaphyseal growth plates of children’s bones. This factor is not taken into account
in the dose calculations given herein. Thus, radiation doses to this part of the ske-
leton may be underestimated for children. However, the mean absorbed dose to bone
surfaces is not likely to be underestimated substantially.
A.7. Model for colloids taken up preferentially in the liver, spleen, and red marrow
(A26) Colloids of 99mTc-sulphur and 198Au were discussed in MIRD Reports
No. 3 and No. 4, respectively (Atkins et al., 1975; Cloutier et al., 1975). The
colloids were assumed to be taken up preferentially in the liver, spleen, and red
marrow, with a uniform distribution of any residue in the remainder of the body.
Uptake fractions were given for three patient categories: normal liver condition,
early to intermediate diffuse parenchymal liver disease, and intermediate to
advanced diffuse parenchymal liver disease. These categories differ not only in
biokinetics, but also with regard to liver and spleen mass. In the normal case,
the uptake in liver, spleen, and red marrow was set at 85, 7, and 5% for sulphur
colloid and 90, 3, and 7% for gold colloid, respectively. These values were esti-
mates based on clinical studies, but no details about the methods used for calculat-
ing the percentages were given. However, the values are in good agreement with
results obtained from animal studies.
(A27) Studies on man have shown decreased uptake of colloids with increasing
degree of liver disease, with corresponding increases in uptake for other organs
(Herzog et al., 1987; Groshar et al., 2002). The change in uptake depends on the
particle size of the administered colloid.
(A28) The Task Group has adopted the same view as the MIRD Committee
with regard to choice of patient categories, definition of organs with active uptake,
organ masses, and biokinetic differences between large and small colloids. The
uptake values used are based on the report by Herzog et al. (1987), which contains
results of quantitative measurements with conjugate view whole-body counting and
double-window regional counting over liver and spleen. For all types of colloid,
immediate uptake is assumed. The biological half-time of the radionuclide is
assumed to be long compared with the physical half-time, except for iodine-labelled
albumin micro-aggregates. For these substances, the metabolic breakdown of the
particles is assumed to be represented by biological half-times (fraction) of 3 h (0.8)
and 5 days (0.2).
47
Condition
Organ 1* 2y 3z
Total body 70 70 70
Liver 1.8 2.4 1.4
Spleen 0.17 0.25 0.4
Red marrow 1.5 1.5 1.5
*Normal liver.
y
Early to intermediate diffuse parenchymal liver disease.
z
Intermediate to advanced diffuse parenchymal liver disease.
Condition
Organ 1y 2z 3§
(A29) The organ masses for different patient categories and uptake data for dif-
ferent sizes of colloid are presented in Tables A.5–A.7. For further details, the reader
is referred to the biokinetic data on the individual substances.
48
Condition
Organ 1y 2z 3§
Extra-
cellular 1 3
fluid Liver Gallbladder
(blood)
2 4 5
Kidney Small
intestine
Excretion
Excretion
Fig. A.2. Model for liver and biliary excretion. The flows are defined as follows: 1, uptake
in liver; 2, uptake in kidney; 3, excretion from liver to gallbladder; 4, excretion from liver
directly to small intestine; and 5, emptying of gallbladder to small intestine.
be taken up rapidly in the liver from the blood and then excreted, via the biliary
tract, partly to the gallbladder for temporary storage and partly to the intestine.
A minor portion of the radiopharmaceutical is excreted in the urine. In pathological
states (liver disease, occlusion of the biliary tract, congenital biliary atresia), the same
model is used but with different kinetic data (transfer factors). The compartmental
model is shown in Fig. A.2.
(A32) Similar models have been used for all substances that undergo biliary excre-
tion. For each substance, the fraction and half-time for movement between compart-
ments are specified in the biokinetic data table. Unless otherwise stated in the model,
it is assumed that 65% of the activity entering the liver is transferred directly from
the liver to the small intestine, and 35% goes to the gallbladder (Wu et al., 1984).
(A33) The gallbladder empties at intervals on stimulation by food. It is assumed to
empty in an identical manner for all substances. The first emptying is after 3 h, during
which time 75% of the radioactive material present in bile is assumed to be excreted
49
to the small intestine. The second emptying is after 9 h, again associated with the
excretion of 75% of the radioactive material in bile. For the dose estimation, the
third and final emptying is assumed to occur after 24 h when all the radioactive
material is excreted. Earlier emptying can be induced by a meal of high fat content
or by cholecystokinin.
(A34) The final excretion from the body follows the models for the gastrointestinal
tract and the kidney–bladder system (see above).
50
Gössner, W., Masse, R., Stather, J.W., 2000. Cells at risk for dosimetric modelling relevant to
bone tumour induction. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 92, 209–213.
Groshar, D., Slobodin, G., Zuckerman, E., 2002. Quantitation of liver and spleen uptake of
99mTc-phytate colloid using SPECT: detection of liver cirrhosis. J. Nucl. Med. 43,
312–317.
Herzog, H., Spohr, G., Notohamiprodjo, G., Feinendegen, L.E., 1987. Absolute quantifica-
tion of pharmacokinetic distribution of RES colloids in individuals with normal liver
function. Nucl. Med. Commun. 8, 157–175.
ICRP, 1975. Report of the Task Group on Reference Man. ICRP Publication 23. Pergamon
Press, Oxford.
ICRP, 1979. Limits for intakes of radionuclides by workers. ICRP Publication 30, Part 1.
Ann. ICRP 2(3/4).
ICRP, 1991a. 1990 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological
Protection. ICRP Publication 60. Ann. ICRP 21(1–3).
ICRP, 2002. Basic anatomical and physiological data for use in radiological protection: refer-
ence values. ICRP Publication 89. Ann. ICRP 31(3/4).
ICRP, 2006. Human alimentary tract model for radiological protection. ICRP Publication
100. Ann. ICRP 35(1/2).
Johansson, L., 1996. Absorbed dose in the salivary glands from technetium-99m labeled
radiopharmaceuticals. In: Schlafke-Stelson, A., Stabin, M.G., Sparks, R.B. (Eds.), Sixth
International Radiopharmaceutical Dosimetry Symposium, Gatlinburg, TN, USA, May
7–10, 1996, Oak Ridge Associated Universities, Oak Ridge, TN, USA, pp. 513–521.
Leggett, R.W., Williams, L.R., 1991. Suggested reference values for regional blood volumes in
humans. Health Phys. 60, 139–154.
Leggett, R.W., Williams, L.R., 1995. A proposed blood circulation model for reference man.
Health Phys. 69, 187–201.
Ryan, J., Cooper, M., Loberg, M., Harvey, E., Sikorski, S., 1977. Technetium-99m-labelled
N-(2,6-dimethylphenyl carbamoylmethyl)-iminodiacetic acid (Tc99mHIDA): a new radio-
pharmaceutical for hepatobiliary imaging studies. J. Nucl. Med. 18, 997–1004.
Smith, T., Veall, N., Wootton, R., 1982. Bladder wall dose from administered radiopharma-
ceuticals: the effect of variation in urine flow rate, voiding interval and initial bladder
content. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 2, 183–189.
Snyder, W.S., Ford, M.R., 1976. Estimation of doses to the urinary bladder and to the gonads.
In: Cloutier, R.J., Coffey, J.L., Snyder, W.S., Watson, E.E. (Eds.), Radiopharmaceutical
Dosimetry Symposium, Oak Ridge, TN, USA, April 26–29, 1976. HEW Publication (FDA
76-8044). Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Bureau of Radiological Health,
Rockville, MD, USA, pp. 313–349.
Stabin, M.G., 1996. MIRDOSE: personal computer software for internal dose assessment in
nuclear medicine. J. Nucl. Med. 37, 538–546.
Stabin, M.G., Siegel, J.A., 2003. Physical models and dose factors for use in internal dose
assessment. Health Phys. 85, 294–310.
Stabin, M.G., Sparks, R.B., Crowe, E., 2005. OLINDA/EXM: the second-generation personal
computer software for internal dose assessment in nuclear medicine. J. Nucl. Med. 46,
1023–1027.
Syed, I.B., 1976. Dosimetry of indium-113m radiopharmaceuticals with special attention to
the urinary bladder. In: Cloutier, R.J., Coffey, J.L., Snyder, W.S., Watson, E.E. (Eds.),
Radiopharmaceutical Dosimetry Symposium, Oak Ridge, TN, USA. HEW Publication
51
52
53
(C1) Orally administered fat is absorbed rapidly and completely from the gastro-
intestinal tract. Within 3–4 h, all activity has reached the blood via the lymphatic
system. After transient uptake and chemical modification in the liver, the fat is
transported to the adipose tissue, which occurs principally in subcutaneous tissue,
yellow marrow, and the abdominal cavity, and to the muscles. Other organs and
tissues receive small amounts. It is then metabolised by b-oxidation, with water and
carbon dioxide (CO2) as end products. The turnover rate is highly dependent on the
nutritional state, especially the supply of carbohydrates.
(C2) Pedersen and Marqversen (1981) measured 14CO2 in expired air in five
healthy subjects who were given labelled neutral fat in a test meal after an 8-h
fast. Unrestricted food was allowed from 6 h later. After 1 day, 15–33% of ingested
fat had been metabolised, and this increased to 25–40% by 10 days. The residue
was retained for a much longer time with a calculated half-time of 304–493 days.
Malmendier et al. (1974) injected 14C-labelled palmitic acid into four fasting
normal subjects and measured expired air for 24 h. They found that 45% of the
fatty acid was oxidised directly to CO2. No carbohydrate was given simultaneously,
which may explain the larger fraction that was metabolised more rapidly than in
the study of Pedersen and Marqversen (1981). Hirsch et al. (1960) studied the
turnover of neutral fat incorporated into adipose tissue, and found half-times up
to 750 days.
(C3) The model adopted here is intended for fat containing unbranched long-
chain (13–18 C atoms) fat molecules and labelled with 14C or 3H, administered
orally or intravenously. Rapid and complete resorption is assumed. After transient
uptake in the liver, the activity is deposited in the adipose tissue (85%), in muscles
(10%), and in all other organs and tissues (5%) according to their fat content as
given in Publication 23 (ICRP, 1975). Assuming adequate supply of carbohy-
drates, 30% is metabolised rapidly (T1/2 ¼ 2 days) and 70% is retained for a
longer time (T1/2 ¼ 400 days). The half-time of 400 days assumed for the
longer-term component of retention of 3H (and 14C) in the body fat is longer
than the overall half-time of 40 days assumed for the total body hydrogen (and
carbon) in Publication 30 (ICRP, 1979) and Publication 56 (ICRP, 1990). This
long-lived component refers only to the fraction of the body fat which is labelled
following administration of a single dose of labelled fat (Gunnarsson et al., 2000),
and which probably represents only a small fraction of the total body carbon
pool. The long-lived component refers in this case to the fraction of body fat
which becomes labelled with the administered radiopharmaceutical. This probably
only represents a small fraction of the total carbon pool in the body.
55
(C4) This model is intended for adults only. It is possible that the metabolism is
significantly different in children, with longer half-times in some tissues (e.g. the
nervous system). The absorbed dose per unit activity administered for adults are
presented in Table C.2.
56
Table C.1. Biokinetic data for 3H-neutral fat and free fatty acids.
57
Table C.2. Absorbed doses for 3H-neutral fat and free fatty acids.
Adrenals 5.1E01
Bone surfaces 6.1E01
Breast 6.9E02
Gastrointestinal tract
Stomach wall 1.3E01
Small intestine wall 1.1E01
Colon wall 1.3E01
(Upper large intestine wall 1.3E01)
(Lower large intestine wall 1.3E01)
Heart wall 2.4E01
Kidneys 1.3E01
Liver 1.4E01
Lungs 2.1E02
Muscles 4.4E04
Ovaries 4.9E02
Pancreas 1.8E01
Red marrow 1.2Eþ00
Spleen 4.6E02
Testes 1.1E01
Thyroid 2.0E01
Remaining organs 2.0E03
58
(C5) Acetate labelled with 11C in the carboxyl position, [1-11C]-acetate, is used for
dynamic positron emission tomography (PET) studies of myocardial metabolism
(Armbrecht et al., 1990; van den Hoff et al., 1996; Sun et al., 1997), and in renal
(Shreve et al., 1995), pancreatic (Shreve and Gross, 1997), and nasopharyngeal dis-
ease (Yeh et al., 1999).
(C6) In most tissues, after extraction from the blood, [1-11C]-acetate is activated to
acetyl co-enzyme A (CoA) and enters the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle. From the
TCA cycle, the label is lost mainly in the form of 11CO2 (Armbrecht et al., 1990). In
resting myocardium, the behaviour of [1-11C]-acetate can be summarised as follows
(Armbrecht et al., 1990):
. extraction of approximately two-thirds of the activity in a single capillary
transit;
. a very rapid initial washout phase (T1/2 < 5 s);
. activation of [1-11C]-acetate to [1-11C]-acetyl-CoA within a few seconds;
. labelling of TCA cycle intermediates takes several minutes;
. onset of rapid 11CO2 release after 2–3 min; and
. 11CO2 release is bi-exponential.
(C7) In all the tissues studied, peak uptake appears to be reached within less than
3 min. After 3–5 min, 50% of the tissue activity is present as 11CO2, 24% as non-
ionised species, and 13% each as acetate and TCA-amino acid intermediates (Sun
et al., 1997). The rate of metabolism of the radiopharmaceutical reflects the rate of
oxidative metabolism in the tissue, and thus the oxygen supply.
(C8) Clinical studies indicate that in both myocardium and kidney parenchyma,
the initial uptake is complete by 2.5–3 min post injection, and that between 3 and
30 min, the 11C is lost from the tissues with a half-time of approximately 10 min. In
normal pancreas, the uptake is also complete in 3 min, and by 30 min, the activity is
lost from the tissue with a half-time of 38 min. In the liver, uptake is again rapid,
peaking at approximately 3 min; thereafter, loss of 11C from the tissue follows a tri-
exponential clearance, with 35% being cleared with a half-time of 10 min and the
remainder with half-times of 1 (30%) and 2 h (35%).
(C9) Few data on the fractional deposition of [1-11C]-acetate in human tissues
appear to be available in the literature. However, as there is a high extraction rate for
[1-11C]-acetate in most tissues and its rate of metabolism reflects the tissue oxygen
supply, the rate of blood flow, expressed as a fraction of cardiac output, in the tissue
may be used as an approximation of the tissue uptake of [1-11C]-acetate. Leggett and
Williams (1995) have tabulated blood flow data for most human tissues, and these
values have been used to construct the biokinetic model illustrated in Table C.3
below. In this model, uptake in all tissues is assumed to be rapid, with a half-time
of 1 min.
59
60
61
62
(0.25) and 6 h (0.75) in the blood. It has also been assumed that 3% of the injected
activity is excreted into the small intestine; half with a biological half-time of 6 h and
half with a biological half-time of 12 h. As labelled amino acids are potentially
important for studies of protein synthesis in the brain (Bergmann et al., 1995;
Schmidt et al., 1997; Shoup et al., 1999), it is assumed that 1.5% of the injected
activity deposits in brain, from where it is released back to the circulation with
biological half-times of 50 (70%) and 5000 days (30%). The parameters of this
generic model are shown in Table C.5.
(C15) Taylor (2000) noted that the biokinetic data from humans or animals that
were used to derive both the compound-specific and the generic models are subject to
fairly large uncertainties (coefficients of variation ranging from approximately 20% to
approximately 80%); therefore, when comparing doses calculated by the generic and
compound-specific biokinetic models, differences in individual tissue or organ doses of
a factor of two, or even three, should be regarded as good agreement.
(C16) This agreement appears to be close enough for the single generic biokinetic
model to be used for normal prospective radiation dosimetry, and for general assess-
ment of the risk from the use of amino acids labelled with 11C, 14C, 18F, or 75Se. In
situations where compound-specific retrospective dosimetry is necessary (e.g. in the
case of accidental intake of a large amount of a radionuclide compound), it might
reasonably be expected that some subject- and compound-specific biokinetic infor-
mation would be available upon which a more accurate person-specific dose assess-
ment could be based. This model is not appropriate for the interpretation of
bio-assay data following intake of 14C-labelled amino acids.
11
C.3.2. References for C-labelled amino acids (generic model)
Atkins, H.L., Christman, D.R., Fowler, J.S., et al., 1972. Organic radiopharmaceuticals
labeled with isotopes of short half-life. V. 18F-labeled 5- and 6-fluorotryptophan. J.
Nucl. Med. 13, 713–719.
Bergmann, R., Brust, P., Kampf, G., Coenen, H.H., Stöcklin, G., 1995. Evaluation of radio-
selenium labeled selenomethionine, a potential tracer for brain protein synthesis by PET.
Nucl. Med. Biol. 22, 475–481.
Coenen, H.H., Kling, P., Stöcklin, G., 1989. Cerebral metabolism of L-[2-18F]fluorotyrosine, a
new PET tracer of protein synthesis. J. Nucl. Med. 30, 1367–1372.
Cottrall, M.F., Taylor, D.M., McElwain, T.J., 1973. Investigations of 18F-p-fluorophenylala-
nine for pancreas scanning. Br. J. Radiol. 46, 277–288.
Deloar, H.M., Fujiwara, T., Nakamura, T., et al., 1998. Estimation of internal absorbed dose
of L-[methyl-11C] methionine using whole body positron emission tomography. Eur. J.
Nucl. Med. 25, 629–633.
Inoue, T., Tomiyoshi, K., Higuichi, T., et al., 1998. Biodistribution studies on L-3-[fluorine-
18]fluoro-a-methyl tyrosine: a potential tumor-detecting agent. J. Nucl. Med. 39, 663–667.
ICRP, 1987. Radiation dose to patients from radiopharmaceuticals. ICRP Publication 53.
Ann. ICRP 18(1–4).
ICRP, 2008. Radiation dose to patients from radiopharmaceuticals. Addendum 3 to ICRP
Publication 53. Ann. ICRP 38(1/2).
63
Schmidt, D., Langen, K-J., Herzog, H., et al., 1997. Whole-body kinetics and dosimetry of L-
3-[123I]iodo-a-methyltyrosine. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. 24, 1162–1166.
Shoup, T.M., Olson, J., Hoffman, J.M., et al., 1999. Synthesis and evaluation of [18F]1-amino-
3-fluorocyclobutane-1-carboxylic acid to image brain tumours. J. Nucl. Med. 40, 331–338.
Stenhouse, M.J., Baxter, M.S., 1977. Bomb 14C as a biological tracer. Nature (Lond.) 267,
828–832.
Stenström, K., Leide-Svegborn, S., Erlandsson, B., et al., 1996. Application of accelerator
mass spectrometry (AMS) for high-sensitivity measurements of 14CO2 in long-term studies
of fat metabolism. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 47, 417–422.
Taylor, D.M., 2000. Generic models for radionuclide dosimetry: 11C, 18F or 75Se-labelled
amino acids. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 52, 911–922.
Taylor, D.M., Cottrall, M.F., 1973. Evaluation of amino acids labelled with 18F for pancreas
scanning. In: Radiopharmaceuticals and Labelled Compounds. Vol. I. IAEA, Vienna, pp.
443–441.
Wester, H.J., Herz, M., Senkowitsch-Schmidtke, R., Schwaiger, M., Stöcklin, G., Hamacher,
K., 1999a. Preclinical evaluation of 4-[18F]fluoroprolines: diasteromeric effect on metabo-
lism and uptake in mice. Nucl. Med. Biol. 26, 259–265.
Wester, H.J., Herz, M., Weber, W., et al., 1999b. Synthesis and radiopharmacology of O-(2-
[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine for tumor imaging. J. Nucl. Med. 40, 205–212.
64
11
Table C.5. Biokinetic data for C-labelled amino acids (generic model).
65
11
Table C.6. Absorbed doses for C-labelled amino acids (generic model).
66
(C17) A large number of radiopharmaceuticals labelled with 11C are being devel-
oped for PET studies of different types of receptor in the human brain. For most of
these agents, the available biokinetic data are insufficient to construct realistic com-
pound-specific biokinetic models for calculating the internal radiation dose delivered
to persons undergoing investigation. Table C.7 shows a list of references and avail-
able data. A generic model for brain receptor substances that predicts the internal
dose with sufficient accuracy for general radiation protection purposes has, therefore,
been developed (Nosslin et al., 2002).
(C18) Biokinetic data for 13 11C radiopharmaceuticals used clinically for imaging
different brain receptors indicate that, despite differences in chemical structure, their
uptake and retention in the human brain and other tissues are broadly similar. The
proposed model, which is shown in Table C.8, assumes instantaneous deposition of
5% of the injected activity in the brain, with the remaining activity being distributed
rapidly and uniformly throughout all other tissues. Elimination from all tissues is
assumed to occur with a half-time of 2 h. It is further assumed that 75% of the injected
11
C is excreted in the urine and 25% via the gallbladder, with a half-time of 2 h.
11
C.4.2. References for C-labelled brain receptor substances (generic model)
Burns, H.D., Dannals, R.F., Langström, B., et al., 1984. 3-N-[11C]methylspiperone, a ligand
binding to dopamine receptors: radiochemical synthesis and biodistribution studies in mice.
J. Nucl. Med. 25, 1222–1227.
Farde, L., Hall, H., Ehrin, E., Sedvall, G., 1986. Quantitative analysis of D2 dopamine
receptor binding in the living human brain. Science 231, 258–261.
Farde, L., Suhara, T., Nyberg, S., et al., 1997. A PET study of [11C]FLB 457 binding to
extrastriatal D2-dopamine receptors in healthy subjects and antipsychotic drug-treated
patients. Psychopharmacology 133, 394–404.
Frost, J.J., Mayberg, H.S., Sadzot, B., et al., 1990. Comparison of [11C]diprenorphine and
[11C]carfentanil binding to opiate receptors in humans by positron emission tomography. J.
Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 10, 484–492.
Herscovitch, P., Schmall, B., Doudet, D., Carson, R., Eckelman, W., 1997. Biodistribution
and radiation dose estimates for [11-C]raclopride (abstract). J. Nucl. Med. 5(Suppl.), 224.
Houle, S., DaSilva, J.N., Wilson, A.A., 2000a. Imaging the 5-HT1A receptors with PET:
WAY-100635 and analogues. Nucl. Med. Biol. 27, 463–466.
Houle, S., Ginovart, N., Hussey, D., Meyer, J.H., Wilson, A.A., 2000b. Imaging the serotonin
transporter system with positron emission tomography: initial human studies with
[11C]DAPP and [11C]DASB. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. 27, 1719–1722.
ICRP, 1987. Radiation dose to patients from radiopharmaceuticals. ICRP Publication 53.
Ann. ICRP 18(1–4).
Iyo, M., Namba, H., Fukushi, K., et al., 1997. Measurement of acetylcholinesterase by posi-
tron emission tomography in the brains of healthy controls and patients with Alzheimer’s
disease. Lancet 349, 1805–1809.
67
Kim, S., Wagner, H.N. Jr, Villemagne, V.L., et al., 1997. Longer occupancy of opioid recep-
tors by nalmefene compared to naloxone as measured in vivo by a dual detector system. J.
Nucl. Med. 38, 1726–1731.
McClain, D.A., Hug, C.C. Jr, 1980. Intravenous fentanyl kinetics. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 28,
106–114.
Mulholland, G.K., Kilbourn, M.R., Sherman, P., et al., 1995. Synthesis, in vivo biodistribu-
tion and dosimetry of [11C]N-methylpiperidyl benzilate ([11C]NMPB), a muscarinic acet-
ylcholine receptor antagonist. Nucl. Med. Biol. 22, 13–17.
Nosslin, B., Johansson, L., Leide-Svegborn, S., Liniecki, J., Mattsson, S., Taylor, D., 2003. A
generic model for 11C-labelled radiopharmaceuticals for imaging receptors in the human
brain. Presented at Workshop of Internal Dosimetry of Radionuclides in Oxford, 9–12
September 2002. Rad. Prot. Dosim. 105, 587–591.
Olsson, H., Halldin, C., Swahn, G., Farde, L., 1999. Quantification of [11C]FLB 457 binding
to extrastriatal dopamine receptors in the human brain. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 19,
1164–1173.
Osman, S., Lundkvist, C., Pike, V.W., et al., 1996. Characterization of the radioactive meta-
bolites of the 5-HT1A receptor radioligand, [O-methy-11C]WAY-100635, in monkey and
human plasma by HPLC: comparison of the behaviour of an identified radioactive meta-
bolite with parent radioligand in monkey using PET. Nucl. Med. Biol. 23, 627–634.
Pappata, S., Samson, Y., Chavoix, C., Prenant, C., Mazière, M., Baron, J.C., 1988. Regional
specific binding of [11C]RO 15 1788 to central type benzodiazepine receptors in human
brain: quantitative evaluation by PET. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 8, 304–313.
Persson, A., Pauli, S., Swahn, C.G., Halldin, C., Sedvall, G., 1989. Cerebral uptake of 11C-Ro
15 1788 and its acid metabolite 11C-Ro 15 3890: PET study in human volunteers. Hum.
Psychopharmacol. 4, 215–220.
Pike, V.W., McCarron, J.A., Hume, S.P., et al., 1995. Preclinical development of a radioligand for
studies of central 5-HT1A receptors in vivo – [11C]WAY-100635. Med. Chem. Res. 5, 208–227.
Szabo, Z., Scheffel, U., Mathews, W.B., et al., 1999. Kinetic analysis of [11C]McN5652: a
serotonin transporter radioligand. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 19, 967–981.
Tanaka, N., Fukushi, K., Shinotoh, H., et al., 2001. Positron emission tomographic measure-
ment of brain acetylcholinesterase activity using N-[11C]methylpiperidin-4-yl acetate with-
out arterial blood sampling: methodology of shape analysis and its diagnostic power for
Alzheimer’s disease. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 21, 295–306.
Verhoeff, N.P., Buseman Sokole, E.B., Hengst, D., Stubbs, J.B., van Royen, E.A., 1993.
Dosimetry of iodine-123 iomazenil in humans. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. 20, 580–584.
Volkow, N.D., Ding, Y-S., Fowler, J.S., et al., 1995. A new PET ligand for the dopamine
transporter: studies in human brain. J. Nucl. Med. 36, 2162–2168.
Votaw, J.R., Ansari, M.S., Scott Mason, N., et al., 1995. Dosimetry of iodine-123-epidepride:
a dopamine D2 receptor ligand. J. Nucl. Med. 36, 1316–1321.
Westera, G., Buck, A., Burger, C., Leenders, K.L., von Schultness, G.K., Schubiger, A.P.,
1996. Carbon-11 and iodine-123 labelled iomazenil: a direct PET-SPECT comparison. Eur.
J. Nucl. Med. 23, 5–12.
Wilson, A.A., Inaba, T., Fischer, N., et al., 1998. Derivatives of WAY 100635 as potential
imaging agents for 5-HT1A receptors: syntheses, radiosyntheses, and in vitro and in vivo
evaluation. Nucl. Med. Biol. 25, 769–776.
68
11
Table C.7. Brain receptor substances – comparison of C retention in brain up to approxi-
mately 90 min.
Brain
Uptake Tmax Tb
Substance (%) (h) (h) Other tissues References
69
11
Table C.8. Biokinetic data for C-labelled brain receptor substances (generic model).
70
11
Table C.9. Absorbed doses for C-labelled brain receptor substances (generic model).
71
72
73
74
[Methyl-11C]-thymidine
(C22) PET studies in a small number of patients (Martiat et al., 1988; Thierens
et al., 1994) have provided information for the distribution of [methyl-11C]-thymidine
over a period of 40 min following intravenous injection. Thierens et al. (1994)
observed that 95% of the activity was cleared rapidly from the blood (T1/2 ¼ 1 min)
and deposited in the liver (40–45%), skeletal muscle (30–34%), and kidneys (5–6%),
with much smaller quantities going to other tissues. At 10 min after injection, less than
15% of the activity remaining in the blood was present as [methyl-11-C]thymidine; this
amounts to less than 0.75% of the injected activity.
(C23) Martiat et al. (1988) reported ‘substantial’ uptake in lungs, spleen, and
intestine, but Thierens et al. (1994) stated that the concentration in spleen and
lungs does not exceed that observed in muscle. Using the data of Martiat et al.
(1988) to calculate organ contents at 30-min post injection suggests uptake of 40%
in liver, 10% in kidneys, 2% in lungs and spleen, and 13% in muscle. Analysis of the
tissue retention data reported by Martiat et al. (1988) and Thierens et al. (1994)
suggests biological half-times of retention ranging from 60 min in the lungs to
460 min in muscle.
(C24) The data of Martiat et al. (1988) and Thierens et al. (1994) have been used to
derive the biokinetic model for [methyl-11C]-thymidine.
[2-11C]-thymidine
(C25) Van der Borght et al. (1992) compared the retention of [2-11C]-thymidine
and [methyl-11C]-thymidine in a PET study involving five patients. Although the
masses of labelled thymidine injected, 3.1 mmol [2-11C]-thymidine and 0.17 mmol
[methyl-11C]-thymidine, differed by a factor of 18, they were both small in relation
to the plasma levels of non-radioactive thymidine, and mass-related changes in the
biokinetics of the two labelled compounds appear unlikely. The initial plasma clear-
ance was very rapid, with more than 99% of the injected activity being removed with
a half-time of less than 1 min. Although there were some differences in the retention
of the small fraction of the injected activity remaining in the plasma at 10 min, these
75
were quite small. At 10-min post injection, 70% of the plasma activity was in the
form of [11C]CO2. The retention of 11C in the liver and kidneys was seven and three
times less for [2-11C]-thymidine than for [methyl-11C]-thymidine, respectively.
(C26) The dosimetric model for [2-11C]-thymidine, as shown in Table C.12, is
based on the assumption that 70% of the injected compound is converted rapidly
to [11C]CO2, which then follows the biokinetic model for continuous inhalation of
[11C]CO2 proposed in Publication 53 (ICRP, 1987); the remaining activity is assumed
to follow a model derived from that for [methyl-11C]-thymidine, but with uptake
values for liver and kidneys based on the observations of Van der Borght et al.
(1992).
11
C.6.2. References for C-labelled thymidine
ICRP, 1987. Radiation doses to patients from radiopharmaceuticals. ICRP Publication 53.
Ann. ICRP 18(1–4).
Martiat, Ph., Ferrant, A., Labar, D., et al., 1988. In vivo measurement of carbon-11 thymidine
uptake in non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma using positron emission tomography. J. Nucl. Med.
29, 1633–1637.
Thierens, H., van Eijkeren, M., Goethals, P., 1994. Biokinetics and dosimetry for
[methyl-11C]thymidine. Br. J. Radiol. 67, 292–295.
Van der Borght, T., de Maeght, S., Labar, D., et al., 1992. Comparison of thymidine labelled
in methyl group and in 2C-ring position in human PET studies. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. 19, 578.
76
11
Table C.12. Biokinetic data for C-labelled thymidine.
[Methyl-11C]-thymidine
Blood 1.00 0.017 0.95 0.046
24 0.05
Liver 0.45 0.017 1.00 0.18
2.0 1.00
Kidneys 0.07 0.017 1.00 0.032
24 1.00
Muscles 0.30 0.0178.0 1.00 0.13
1.00
Other organs and tissues 0.13 0.017 1.00 0.056
4.0 1.00
[2-11C]-thymidine
Blood 1.00 0.017 0.99 0.028
24 0.01
Liver 0.07 0.017 1.00 0.024
0.67 0.70
2.0 0.30
Kidneys 0.03 0.017 1.00 0.011
0.67 0.70
24 0.30
Other organs and tissues 0.90 0.017 1.00 0.31
0.67 0.70
8.0 0.30
77
11
Table C.13. Absorbed doses for C-labelled thymidine.
[Methyl-11C]-thymidine
Adrenals 4.3E03 5.3E03 7.9E03 1.2E02 2.0E02
Bone surfaces 1.8E03 2.2E03 3.3E03 5.1E03 1.0E02
Brain 9.6E04 1.1E03 1.7E03 2.6E03 5.1E03
Breast 1.3E03 1.5E03 2.6E03 3.9E03 7.5E03
Gallbladder wall 5.5E03 6.2E03 8.1E03 1.3E02 2.6E02
Gastrointestinal tract
Stomach wall 2.2E03 2.5E03 4.1E03 6.5E03 1.3E02
Small intestine wall 2.0E03 2.4E03 3.8E03 6.1E03 1.1E02
Colon wall 1.9E03 2.2E03 3.5E03 5.6E03 1.0E02
(Upper large intestine wall 2.3E03 2.6E03 4.3E03 6.8E03 1.3E02)
(Lower large intestine wall 1.4E03 1.6E03 2.5E03 3.9E03 7.0E03)
Heart wall 4.0E03 5.1E03 7.9E03 1.2E02 2.2E02
Kidneys 3.1E02 3.8E02 5.4E02 8.0E02 1.4E01
Liver 3.2E02 4.2E02 6.4E02 9.4E02 1.8E01
Lungs 3.5E03 4.4E03 6.9E03 1.1E02 2.1E02
Muscles 2.2E03 3.4E03 6.7E03 1.8E02 3.1E02
Oesophagus 1.6E03 1.9E03 2.7E03 4.2E03 7.5E03
Ovaries 1.6E03 1.9E03 3.0E03 4.8E03 8.9E03
Pancreas 3.5E03 4.2E03 6.6E03 1.0E02 1.7E02
Red marrow 2.2E03 2.5E03 3.8E03 5.6E03 1.0E02
Skin 1.1E03 1.3E03 1.9E03 3.0E03 5.7E03
Spleen 3.1E03 3.9E03 6.1E03 9.5E03 1.8E02
Testes 1.1E03 1.3E03 2.0E03 3.1E03 5.9E03
Thymus 1.6E03 1.9E03 2.7E03 4.2E03 7.5E03
Thyroid 1.5E03 1.9E03 3.1E03 5.0E03 9.6E03
Urinary bladder wall 1.4E03 1.5E03 2.4E03 4.0E03 6.6E03
Uterus 1.5E03 1.9E03 3.0E03 4.8E03 8.8E03
Remaining organs 2.4E03 3.7E03 6.7E03 1.4E02 2.2E02
78
[2-11C]-thymidine
Adrenals 2.9E03 3.7E03 5.8E03 9.3E03 1.7E02
Bone surfaces 2.4E03 3.0E03 4.7E03 7.6E03 1.5E02
Brain 1.9E03 2.4E03 4.0E03 6.7E03 1.3E02
Breast 1.8E03 2.3E03 3.6E03 5.9E03 1.1E02
Gallbladder wall 2.8E03 3.4E03 5.2E03 7.9E03 1.5E02
Gastrointestinal tract
Stomach wall 2.4E03 2.9E03 4.6E03 7.3E03 1.4E02
Small intestine wall 2.4E03 3.1E03 4.9E03 7.8E03 1.5E02
Colon wall 2.4E03 2.9E03 4.7E03 7.4E03 1.4E02
(Upper large intestine wall 2.4E03 3.0E03 4.8E03 7.7E03 1.4E02)
(Lower large intestine wall 2.3E03 2.7E03 4.5E03 7.1E03 1.3E02)
Heart wall 3.4E03 4.3E03 6.8E03 1.1E02 2.0E02
Kidneys 1.1E02 1.3E02 1.9E02 2.8E02 5.1E02
Liver 5.2E03 6.8E03 1.0E02 1.6E02 2.9E02
Lungs 3.0E03 3.9E03 6.2E03 9.9E02 1.9E02
Muscles 2.1E03 2.6E03 4.1E03 6.6E03 1.3E02
Oesophagus 2.2E03 2.8E03 4.3E03 6.9E03 1.3E02
Ovaries 2.4E03 3.0E03 4.8E03 7.6E03 1.4E02
Pancreas 2.7E03 3.4E03 5.3E03 8.3E03 1.6E02
Red marrow 2.5E03 3.1E03 4.8E03 7.6E03 1.4E02
Skin 1.7E03 2.1E03 3.4E03 5.6E03 1.1E02
Spleen 3.0E03 3.7E03 5.9E03 9.6E03 1.8E02
Testes 2.0E03 2.5E03 3.9E03 6.2E03 1.2E02
Thymus 2.2E03 2.8E03 4.3E03 6.9E03 1.3E02
Thyroid 2.3E03 2.9E03 4.7E03 7.8E03 1.5E02
Urinary bladder wall 2.3E03 2.7E03 4.3E03 7.1E03 1.3E02
Uterus 2.4E03 3.0E03 4.8E03 7.6E03 1.4E02
Remaining organs 2.1E03 2.6E03 4.2E03 6.8E03 1.3E02
79
(C27) It is assumed that 50% of the decay occurs while the substance passes the
urinary bladder, and the remaining 50% of the total disintegration occurs when it is
distributed homogeneously throughout the whole body.
11
Table C.14. Biokinetic data for C-labelled substances (realistic maximum).
80
11
Table C.15. Absorbed doses for C-labelled substances (realistic maximum).
81
11
C.8.2. References for C-raclopride
Glatting, G., Mottaghy, F.M., Karitzky, J., et al., 2004. Improving binding potential analysis
in [11C]raclopride PET studies using cluster analysis. Med. Phys. 31, 902–906.
ICRP, 1987. Radiation dose to patients from radiopharmaceuticals. ICRP Publication 53.
Ann. ICRP 18(1–4).
Ribeiro, M-J., Ricard, M., Bourgeois, S., et al., 2005. Biodistribution and radiation dosimetry
of [11C]raclopride in healthy volunteers. Eur. J. Nucl. Mol. Imag. 32, 952–958.
Slifstein, M., Lawrence, S., Kegeles, L.S., et al., 2007. [11C]NNC 112 selectivity for dopamine
D1 and serotonin 5-HT2A receptors: a PET study in healthy human subjects. J. Cerebr.
Blood Flow Metab. 27, 1733–1741.
Slifstein, M., Suckow, R.F., Javitch, J.A., Cooper, T., 2011. Characterization of in vivo
pharmacokinetic properties of the dopamine D1 receptor agonist DAR-0100A in non-
human primates using PET with [11C] NNC112 and [11C] raclopride. J. Cerebr. Blood
Flow Metab. 31, 293–304.
82
11
Table C.16. Biokinetic data for C-raclopride.
83
11
Table C.17. Absorbed doses after intravenous administration of C-raclopride.
84
(C30) Orally administered fat is absorbed rapidly and completely from the gastro-
intestinal tract. Within 3–4 h, all activity has reached the blood via the lymphatic
system. After transient uptake and chemical modification in the liver, the fat is
transported to the adipose tissue, which occurs principally in subcutaneous tissue,
yellow marrow, and the abdominal cavity, and to the muscles. Other organs and
tissues only receive small amounts. It is then metabolised by b-oxidation, with water
and CO2 as end products. The turnover rate is highly dependent on the nutritional
state, especially the supply of carbohydrates.
(C31) Pedersen and Marqversen (1981) measured 14CO2 in expired air in five
healthy subjects, who were given labelled neutral fat in a test meal after an 8-h
fast. From 6 h later, unrestricted food was allowed. After 1 day, 15–33% of ingested
fat was metabolised, and this increased to 25–40% by 10 days. The residue was
retained for a much longer time with a calculated half-time of 304–493 days.
Malmendier et al. (1974) injected 14C-labelled palmitic acid into four fasting
normal subjects and measured expired air over 24 h. They found that 45% of the
fatty acid was oxidised directly to CO2. No carbohydrate was given simultaneously,
which may explain the larger fraction metabolised more rapidly than in the study of
Pedersen and Marqversen (1981). Hirsch et al. (1960) studied the turnover of neutral
fat incorporated into adipose tissue and found half-times up to 750 days.
(C32) The model adopted here and shown in Table C.18 is intended for fat con-
taining unbranched long-chain (13–18 C atoms) fat molecules and labelled with 14C
or 3H, administered orally or intravenously. Rapid and complete resorption is
assumed. After transient uptake in the liver, the activity is deposited in the adipose
tissue (85%), in muscles (10%), and in all other organs and tissues (5%) according to
their fat content as given in Publication 23 (ICRP, 1975). Assuming adequate supply
of carbohydrates, 30% is metabolised rapidly (T1/2 ¼ 2 days) and 70% is retained for
a longer time (T1/2 ¼ 400 days). The half-time of 400 days assumed for the longer-
term component of retention of 3H (and 14C) in the body fat is longer than the
overall half-time of 40 days assumed for the total body hydrogen (and carbon) in
Publications 30 and 56 (ICRP, 1981, 1990). This long-lived component refers only to
that fraction of the body fat that is labelled following administration of a single dose
of labelled fat administered as a radiopharmaceutical, and which probably represents
only a small fraction of the total body carbon pool. The long-lived component refers
in this case to the fraction of body fat which becomes labelled with the administered
radiopharmaceutical. This probably only represents a small fraction of the total
carbon pool in the body.
(C33) This model is intended for adults only. It is possible that the metabolism is
significantly different in children, with longer half-times in some tissues (e.g. the
nervous system).
85
14
C.9.2. References for C-neutral fat and free fatty acids
Hirsch, J., Farquhar, J.W., Ahrens, J.E.H., Petersen, M.L., Stoffel, W., 1960. Studies of
adipose tissue in man. J. Clin. Nutr. 8, 499–510.
ICRP, 1975. Report of the Task Group on Reference Man. ICRP Publication 23. Pergamon
Press, Oxford.
ICRP, 1981. Limits for intakes of radionuclides by workers. ICRP Publication 30, Part 3.
Ann. ICRP 6(2/3).
ICRP, 1990. Age-dependent doses to members of the public from intake of radionuclides. Part
1. ICRP Publication 56. Ann. ICRP 20(2).
Malmendier, C.L., Delcroix, C., Berman, M., 1974. Interrelations in oxidative metabolism of
free fatty acids, glucose and glycerol in normal and hyperlipemic patients. A compartmen-
tal model. J. Clin. Invest. 54, 461–476.
Pedersen, N.T., Marqversen, J., 1981. Metabolism of ingested 14C-triolein. Estimation of
radiation dose in tests of lipid assimilation using 14C- and 3H-labelled fatty acids. Eur. J.
Nucl. Med. 6, 327–329.
14
Table C.18. Biokinetic data for C-neutral fat and free fatty acids.
86
14
Table C.19. Absorbed doses for C-neutral fat and free fatty acids.
Adrenals 4.8Eþ00
Bone surfaces 5.8Eþ00
Breast 6.5E01
Gastrointestinal tract
Stomach wall 1.2Eþ00
Small intestine wall 1.0Eþ00
Colon wall 1.3Eþ00
(Upper large intestine wall 1.3Eþ00)
(Lower large intestine wall 1.2Eþ00)
Heart wall 2.3Eþ00
Kidneys 1.2Eþ00
Liver 1.3Eþ00
Lungs 2.0E01
Muscles 3.8E03
Ovaries 4.6E01
Pancreas 1.7Eþ00
Red marrow 1.1Eþ01
Spleen 4.3E01
Testes 1.0Eþ00
Thyroid 1.9Eþ00
Remaining organs 1.8E02
87
(C34) Urea (carbamide, H2NCONH2) is the main end product in the human
catabolism of proteins, polypeptides, amino acids, and other nitrogen-containing
substances. It is freely water soluble and distributes rapidly into the total body
water. The main part is excreted unchanged by the kidneys, while a small part
diffuses into the intestinal content where it is broken down by urease-producing
bacteria to ammonia and CO2. The CO2 is reabsorbed and equilibrates with bicar-
bonate, thus entering the CO2/bicarbonate pools in the body and finally being
exhaled by the lungs (Walser and Bodenlos, 1959).
14
C urea
(C35) A breath test employing per-oral administration of 14C-urea is commonly
used to detect the presence of Helicobacter pylori in the stomach of patients with peptic
ulcer and other gastric diseases. Normally, the stomach does not contain urease-pro-
ducing bacteria, so the urea is rapidly absorbed unchanged into body water. H. pylori,
on the other hand, produces urease and therefore brings about extensive early expira-
tion of labelled CO2, resulting in a positive breath test (Marshall and Surveyor, 1988;
Combs et al., 1999; Walser and Bodenlos, 1959).
(C36) In the model for per-oral administration, there is, in the normal case,
complete and rapid (T1/2 ¼ 5 min) resorption from the stomach. In the case of H.
pylori infection in the stomach, it is assumed that 65% is immediately converted to
CO2, which is treated further according to the dosimetric model for CO2/bicarbonate
(see below). The remaining 35% is resorbed from the stomach in the same way as in
the normal case.
(C37) Urea resorbed in the stomach is distributed rapidly in the total body water.
Eighty percent is excreted by the kidneys with a half-time of 6 h, and 20% is broken
down rapidly in the same way as intravenously administered urea to ammonia and
CO2, treated according to the dosimetric model for CO2/bicarbonate.
14
C carbon dioxide/bicarbonate
(C38) CO2 is formed continuously in the metabolism of all organic substances in
the body. Together with water, it forms carbonic acid (H2CO3), which dissociates
and equilibrates with bicarbonate ions (HCO3). The substances are present in all
body fluids. Winchell et al. (1970) presented a kinetic model with two compartments,
one (Compartment I) with rapid (within 3 min) equilibration with CO2/HCO3 in
blood and another (Compartment II) with slower equilibration. CO2 leaves the
system from Compartment I by exhalation. A certain small fraction was assumed
to be ‘relatively fixed’ in the body, presumably in the form of bone bicarbonate and
as a constituent of larger molecules with slow turnover. Compartment I included
organs with high vascular perfusion (heart, liver, kidneys, intestinal tract, etc.), while
Compartment II was represented by muscle, skin, and fat with a lower blood
flow rate.
88
(C39) Stubbs and Marshall (1993) modified this model slightly by defining a
Compartment III, corresponding to the ‘fixed’ fraction and having a flow back to
Compartment I with a half-time of 1000 h in accordance with the assumption for
carbon metabolism in Publication 30 (ICRP, 1981). This half-time of 1000 h may not
be sufficient to account for carbon deposited in the bone compartments with
slow metabolic turnover, as there is experimental evidence for a much longer turn-
over time.
(C40) The biokinetic model adopted here (Fig. C.1) is based on the models men-
tioned above with the following modifications. Compartment III has been further
divided into three compartments, one (Compartment 3) being assumed to represent
uptake in large molecules having a slow turnover with a biological half-time of
1000 h. The other compartments are assumed to represent bone. In the present
model, bone has been divided into trabecular bone (Compartment 4) and cortical
(compact) bone (Compartment 5), from which the activity is lost at a rate of 0.18 per
year (half-time 3.9 years) and 0.03 per year (half-time 23 years), respectively (ICRP,
1995). Eighty percent of the bone mass is assumed to be cortical bone and 20% is
assumed to be trabecular bone (ICRP, 1995). The rate of inflow to Compartments 3,
4, and 5 is chosen so that realistic carbonate/bicarbonate pool sizes are reached
during a lifetime. This means that the inflow rate constants to the bone compart-
ments have been set to twice the steady-state value calculated to give a carbonate/
bicarbonate pool in the bone of 300 g. The model is shown in Fig. C.1, and the tables
in this subsection show values used for the transfer constants. The numerical values
Fig. C.1. Biokinetic model for carbon dioxide/bicarbonate. The model presented is valid
for adults. The transfer constants are given as h1. Compartment 1 represents organs with
high vascular perfusion (heart, liver, kidneys, intestinal tract, etc.), and Compartment 2
represents tissues with a lower blood flow rate (muscle, skin, and fat).
89
for transfer constants not taken from Publication 70 (ICRP, 1995) or calculated from
steady-state conditions are taken from Winchell et al. (1970).
14
C.10.2. References for C-labelled urea including carbon dioxide/bicarbonate
Combs, M.J., Stubbs, J.B., Agarwal, A.K., et al., 1999. Dose estimates for a capsule-based
14
C-urea breath test. In: S-Stelson, A.T., Stabin, M.G., Sparks, R.B. (Eds.), Proceedings of
the Sixth International Radiopharmaceutical Dosimetry Symposium, Gatlinburg, TN,
USA, May 7–10, 1996. Oak Ridge Associated Universities, Oak Ridge, TN, USA, pp.
620–630.
ICRP, 1981. Limits for intakes of radionuclides by workers. ICRP Publication 30, Part 3.
Ann. ICRP 6(2/3).
ICRP, 1995. Basic anatomical and physiological data for use in radiation protection: the
skeleton. ICRP Publication 70. Ann. ICRP 25(2).
Marshall, B.J., Surveyor, I., 1988. Carbon-14 urea breath test for the diagnosis of
Campylobacter pylori associated gastritis. J. Nucl. Med. 29, 11–16.
Stubbs, J.B., Marshall, B.J., 1993. Radiation dose estimates for the carbon-14-labeled urea
breath test. J. Nucl. Med. 34, 821–825.
Walser, M., Bodenlos, L.J., 1959. Urea metabolism in man. J. Clin. Invest. 38, 1617–1626.
Winchell, H.S., Stahelin, H., Kusubov, N., et al., 1970. Kinetics of CO2-HCO3 in normal
adult males. J. Nucl. Med. 12, 711–715.
90
14
Table C.20. Biokinetic data for C-labelled urea.
Normal case
Oral administration
Stomach contents 1.00 0.083 1.00 0.12
Total body (excluding contents) 0.80 0.083 1.00 6.9
6.0 1.00
Urinary bladder contents 0.80 1.5
CO2 pool 0.20 (Immediate transfer in the body)
Cortical bone 5.0
Trabecular bone 1.4
Other organs and tissues 50
Helicobacter-positive patient
Oral administration
Stomach contents 1.00 0.083 1.00 0.12
Total body (excluding contents) 0.28 0.083 1.00 2.4
6.0 1.00
Urinary bladder contents 0.28 0.52
CO2 pool 0.65 (Immediate conversion in the stomach)
0.07 (Immediate transfer in the body)
Cortical bone 18
Trabecular bone 5.0
Other organs and tissues 180
91
14
Table C.21. Absorbed doses for C-labelled urea.
92
93
(C41) Water labelled with 15O is widely used to evaluate regional cerebral blood
flow using PET, and has been proposed for blood flow measurement in other organs
and tissues. Early biokinetic models based on equilibrium tracer distribution in body
water are inaccurate for use with 15O-water. On account of the short physical half-
life of 15O (2.04 min), uniform radionuclide concentration in body water is not
attained; consequently, such models underestimate dose values for this substance.
(C42) A more satisfactory method of kinetic modelling is based on organ blood
flow rates. Using this model, the concentration of 15O-water in a given organ is
derived by convolution of the arterial blood concentration (arterial input function)
and the transit time function (impulse response) of the organ. The latter is given by
exp[- (F/Vd þ )t], where F (ml min1 g1) is the organ blood flow, Vd (ml g tissue1/
ml ml blood1) is its relative water distribution space, and (min1) is the radio-
active decay constant of 15O. Thus, following intravenous administration of
15
O-water and measurement of the arterial blood concentration, a retention equation
can be derived for organs for which values of F and Vd are known.
(C43) In practice, a measured amount of 15O-water activity is injected via a fore-
arm vein, and the arterial blood concentration is monitored continuously from the
other forearm. Residence time (min) in a given organ is calculated as the product of
the areas under the curves of the arterial input function (min ml1 per administered
MBq) and the organ transit time function (min), multiplied by the total blood flow to
the organ (ml min1). The latter is given by F M, where M is the mass (g) of the
organ. Table C.22 lists organ residence times that lead to organ doses equal to the
mean values that have been estimated using the blood flow model at four different
centres (Berridge et al., 1991; Herscovich et al., 1993; Brihaye et al., 1995; Eichling
et al., 1997). Direct measurements of the retention in some organs by PET (Smith
et al., 1994) have shown good agreement with the model for brain, heart, liver, and
spleen.
15
C.11.2. References for O-water
Berridge, M.S., Adler, L.P., Rao, P.S., 1991. Radiation absorbed dose for O-15-butanol and
O-15 water estimated by positron emission tomography. J. Nucl. Med. 32, 1043.
Brihaye, C., Depresseux, J.C., Comar, D., 1995. Radiation dosimetry for bolus administration
of oxygen-15 water. J. Nucl. Med. 36, 651–656.
Eichling, J.O., Bergman, S.R., Schwarz, S.W., et al., 1997. Equivalent dose estimates in adults
for intravenously administered O-15 water. Unpublished; personal communication through
S.W. Schwarz.
Herscovitch, P., Carson, R.E., Stabin, M., et al., 1993. A new kinetic approach to estimate the
radiation dosimetry of flow-based radiotracers. J. Nucl. Med. 34, 155.
Smith, T., Tong, C., Lammertsma, A.A., et al., 1994. Dosimetry of intravenously administered
oxygen-15 labelled water in man: a model based on experimental human data from 21
subjects. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. 21, 1126–1134.
94
15
Table C.22. Biokinetic data for O-water.
Adrenals 0.000044
Brain 0.0036
Bone 0.0012
Gastrointestinal tract
Stomach wall 0.00047
Small intestine wall 0.0018
Upper large intestine wall 0.00061
Lower large intestine wall 0.00047
Heart contents 0.0015
Heart wall 0.00067
Kidneys 0.0010
Liver 0.0053
Lungs 0.0031
Muscles 0.011
Ovaries* 0.000014
Pancreas 0.00025
Red marrow 0.0016
Spleen 0.00056
Testes* 0.000056
Thyroid 0.000064
Other organs and tissues 0.016
*For adults, the ratio between cumulated activity in the gonads and that in the total
body is proportional to the ratio of gonad weight and total body weight. For chil-
dren, the same assumption is made.
95
15
Table C.23. Absorbed doses for O-water.
96
(C44) The generic biokinetic model for 18F-labelled amino acids is the same as the
generic biokinetic model for 11C-labelled amino acids (see Section C.3.1). It is based
on the following references: Coenen et al., 1989; Cottrall et al., 1973; Inoue et al.,
1998; ICRP, 1987, 2008; Schmidt et al., 1997; Shoup et al., 1999; Stenhouse and
Baxter, 1977; Stenström et al., 1996; Taylor, 2000; Taylor et al., 1973; Wester et al.,
1999a, 1999b.
18
C.12.2. References for F-labelled amino acids (generic model)
Coenen, H.H., Kling, P., Stöcklin, G., 1989. Cerebral metabolism of L-[2-18F]fluorotyrosine, a
new PET tracer of protein synthesis. J. Nucl. Med. 30, 1367–1372.
Cottrall, M.F., Taylor, D.M., McElwain, T.J., 1973. Investigations of 18F-p-fluorophenylala-
nine for pancreas scanning. Br. J. Radiol. 46, 277–288.
Inoue, T., Tomiyoshi, K., Higuichi, T., et al., 1998. Biodistribution studies on l-3-[fluorine-
18]fluoro-a-methyl tyrosine: a potential tumor-detecting agent. J. Nucl. Med. 39, 663–667.
ICRP, 1987. Radiation dose to patients from radiopharmaceuticals. ICRP Publication 53.
Ann. ICRP 18(1–4).
ICRP, 2008. Radiation dose to patients from radiopharmaceuticals. Addendum 3 to ICRP
Publication 53. Ann. ICRP 38(1/2).
Schmidt, D., Langen, K-J., Herzog, H., et al., 1997. Whole-body kinetics and dosimetry of
123
L-3-[ I]iodo-a-methyltyrosine. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. 24, 1162–1166.
Shoup, T.M., Olson, J., Hoffman, J.M., et al., 1999. Synthesis and evaluation of [18F]1-amino-
3-fluorocyclobutane-1-carboxylic acid to image brain tumours. J. Nucl. Med. 40, 331–338.
Stenhouse, M.J., Baxter, M.S., 1977. Bomb 14C as a biological tracer. Nature (Lond.) 267,
828–832.
Stenström, K., Leide-Svegborn, S., Erlandsson, B., et al., 1996. Application of accelerator
mass spectrometry (AMS) for high-sensitivity measurements of 14CO2 in long-term studies
of fat metabolism. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 47, 417–422.
Taylor, D.M., 2000. Generic models for radionuclide dosimetry: 11C, 18F or 75Se-labelled
amino acids. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 52, 911–922.
Taylor, D.M., Cottrall, M.F., 1973. Evaluation of amino acids labelled with 18F for pancreas
scanning. In: Radiopharmaceuticals and Labelled Compounds. Vol. I. IAEA, Vienna,
pp. 443–441.
Wester, H.J., Herz, M., Senkowitsch-Schmidtke, R., Schwaiger, M., Stöcklin, G., Hamacher,
K., 1999a. Preclinical evaluation of 4-[18F]fluoroprolines: diasteromeric effect on metabo-
lism and uptake in mice. Nucl. Med. Biol. 26, 259–265.
Wester, H.J., Herz, M., Weber, W., et al., 1999b. Synthesis and radiopharmacology of O-(2-
[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine for tumor imaging. J. Nucl. Med. 40, 205–212.
97
18
Table C.24. Biokinetic data for F-labelled amino acids (generic model).
98
18
Table C.25. Absorbed doses for F-labelled amino acids (generic model).
99
(C45) A large number of radiopharmaceuticals labelled with 18F and 123I have
been developed for PET and single photon emission computer tomographic
(SPECT) studies of different types of receptor in the human brain. For many of
these substances, the available biokinetic data are insufficient to construct realistic
compound-specific biokinetic models for the calculation of absorbed dose to persons
undergoing an investigation. Therefore, a generic model for radionuclide-labelled
brain receptor substances that would predict the internal radiation dose with suffi-
cient accuracy for general radiation protection purposes has been developed.
(C46) A generic model for 11C-labelled brain receptor substances has been pub-
lished previously (Nosslin et al., 2003). A review of the literature has identified
biokinetic and dosimetric data for five 18F-labelled and 15 123I-labelled compounds
considered to be potential substances for the clinical imaging of brain receptors (e.g.
acetylcholinesterase receptors, benzodiazepine receptors, dopamine receptors, dopa-
mine transporters, and serotonin receptors). These data indicate that despite fairly
large differences in chemical structure, the patterns of uptake in the human brain,
and other tissues for which information is available, appear to be sufficiently similar
to justify a generic model for each radionuclide. For details, the reader is referred to
Booij et al. (1998a, 1998b), Boundy et al. (1995), Deterding et al. (2001), Gründer et
al. (2001, 2003), Kauppinen et al. (2003), Kuikka et al. (1994), Mitterhauser et al.
(2004), Mozley et al. (1995, 1996), Taylor (2000), van de Wiele et al. (1999), Verhoeff
et al. (1993a, 1993b), Versijpt et al. (2000), Votaw et al. (1995), Volkow et al. (1995),
and Waterhouse et al. (2003).
(C47) For some compounds, the published data on the dosimetry of 18F- and 123I-
labelled receptor radiopharmaceuticals were derived from PET and SPECT studies
in humans, and for other compounds, the biokinetic models were derived, at least in
part, from studies of biodistribution in experimental animals.
(C48) The generic model proposed for 18F-labelled substances assumes that frac-
tions of 0.07, 0.08, 0.05, 0.02, 0.02, and 0.002 of the administered activity are dis-
tributed instantaneously to the brain, liver, lungs, kidneys, stomach wall, and
thyroid, respectively, from where they are excreted with a biological half-time of
10 h. The remaining activity is assumed to be distributed uniformly throughout the
rest of the body, and eliminated with a biological half-time of 10 h. A biological half-
time of 10 h means that approximately 98% of the 18F will decay in the tissue of
interest. It is assumed that of the activity entering the liver, 30% is eliminated via the
gallbladder and the remainder would pass directly into the small intestine. A total of
90% of the administered activity is assumed to be excreted in the urine and 10% via
the gastrointestinal tract.
100
18
C.13.2. References for F-labelled brain receptor substances (generic model)
Booij, J., Sokole, E.B., Stabin, M.G., Janssen, A.G.M., de Bruin, K., van Royen, E.A., 1998a.
Human biodistribution and dosimetry of [123I]FP-CIT: a potent radioligand for imaging of
dopamine transporters. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. 25, 24–30.
Booij, J., Sokole, E.B., Stabin, M.G., Janssen, A.G.M., de Bruin, K., van Royen, E.A., 1998b.
Human biodistribution and dosimetry of [123I]FP-CIT: a potent radioligand for imaging of
dopamine transporters: erratum. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. 25, 458.
Boundy, K.L., Barnden, L.R., Rowe, C.C., et al., 1995. Human dosimetry and biodistribution
of iodine-123-iododexetimide: a SPECT imaging agent for cholinergic muscarinic neuror-
eceptors. J. Nucl. Med. 36, 1332–1338.
Deterding, T.A., Votaw, J.R., Wang, C.K., et al., 2001. Biodistribution and radiation dosi-
metry of the dopamine transporter ligand [18F]FECNT. J. Nucl. Med. 42, 376–381.
Gründer, G., Siessmeier, T., Lange-Asschenfeldt, C., et al., 2001. [18F]Fluoroethylflumaazenil:
a novel tracer for PET imaging of human benzodiazepine receptors. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. 28,
1463–1470.
Gründer, G., Siessmeier, T., Piel, M., et al., 2003. Quantification of D2-like dopamine recep-
tors in the human brain with [18F]-desmethoxyfallypride. J. Nucl. Med. 44, 109–116.
Kauppinen, T.A., Bergström, K.A., Heikman, P., Hiltunen, J., Ahonen, A.K., 2003.
Biodistribution and radiation dosimetry of [123I]ADAM in healthy human subjects: pre-
liminary results. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. 30, 132–136.
Kuikka, J.T., Bergström, K.A., Ahonen, A., Länsimies, E., 1994. The dosimetry of iodine-123
labelled 2b-carbomethoxy-3b-(4-iodophenyl)tropane. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. 21, 53–56.
Mitterhauser, M., Wadsak, W., Wabnegger, L., et al., 2004. Biological evaluation of 2’-
[18F]fluoroflumazenil ([18F]FFMZ): a potential GABA receptor ligand for PET. Nucl.
Med. Biol. 31, 291–295.
Mozley, P.D., Stubbs, J.T., Kim, H-J., et al., 1995. Dosimetry of a D2/D3 dopamine receptor
antagonist that can be used with PET or SPECT. J. Nucl. Med. 36, 1322–1331.
Mozley, P.D., Stubbs, J.T., Kim, H-J., et al., 1996. Dosimetry of an iodine-123-labeled tro-
pane to image dopamine transporters. J. Nucl. Med. 37, 151–159.
Nosslin, B., Johansson, L., Leide-Svegborn, S., Liniecki, J., Mattsson, S., Taylor, D.M., 2003.
A generic model for [11C]-labelled radiopharmaceuticals for imaging receptors in the
human brain. Rad. Prot. Dosim. 105, 587–591.
Taylor, D.M., 2000. Unpublished assessments.
van de Wiele, C., De Vos, F., De Sutter, J., et al., 1999. Biokinetics and dosimetry of (iodine-
123)-iodomethyl-N,N-dimethyltamoxifen, an (anti)oestrogen receptor radioligand. Eur. J.
Nucl. Med. 26, 1259–1264.
Verhoeff, N.P., Sokole, E.B., Stabin, M., et al., 1993a. Dosimetry of iodine-123 iodobenza-
mide in healthy volunteers. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. 20, 747–752.
Verhoeff, N.P., Busemann Sokole, E., Hengst, D., Stubbs, J.B., van Royen, E.A., 1993b.
Dosimetry of iodine-123 iomazenil in humans. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. 20, 580–584.
Versijpt, J., Dumont, F., Thierens, H., et al., 2000. Biodistribution and dosimetry of [123I]iodo-
PK 11195: a potential agent for SPET imaging of the peripheral benzodiazepine receptor.
Eur. J. Nucl. Med. 27, 1326–1333.
Votaw, J.R., Ansari, M.S., Scott Mason, N., et al., 1995. Dosimetry of iodine-123-epidepride:
a dopamine D2 receptor ligand. J. Nucl. Med. 36, 1316–1321.
Volkow, N.D., Ding, Y.S., Fowler, J.S., et al., 1995. A new PET ligand for the dopamine
transporter: studies in human brain. J. Nucl. Med. 36, 2162–2168.
101
Waterhouse, R.N., Stabin, M.G., Page, J.G., 2003. Preclinical acute toxicity studies and
rodent-based dosimetry estimates of the novel sigma-1 receptor radiotracer [18F]FPS.
Nucl. Med. Biol. 30, 555–563.
18
Table C.26. Biokinetic data for F-labelled brain receptor substances (generic model).
102
18
Table C.27. Absorbed doses for F-labelled brain receptor substances (generic model).
103
(C49) Choline uptake is increased in cancerous tissues because the high metabolic
rates of tumour cells require choline for the synthesis of phospholipids. For example,
choline kinase is overexpressed in prostate cancer cells (Ramirez de Molina et al.,
2002; Ackerstaff et al., 2003), thus making choline a suitable indicator for early and
differential diagnosis of prostate cancer. PET with radiolabelled choline is therefore
used for diagnosis of malignant and recurrent tumours, and metastases in prostate
cancer patients (DeGrado et al., 2002; Schmid et al., 2005; Kwee et al., 2006; Steiner
et al., 2009). Correct evaluation of the patient dose and optimisation of the imaging
protocols imply knowledge of the biodistribution and kinetics of the administered
compounds. The biokinetics of 18F-choline (18F-FCH) in four prostate cancer
patients were investigated in a study conducted in the frame of the European
Collaborative project MADEIRA (Hoeschen et al., 2010; Uusijärvi et al., 2010).
Six new patients were later included in the study. In these investigations, biodistribu-
tion and excretion data were collected for up to 4 h after injection of the radio-
pharmaceutical (Janzen et al., 2010; Giussani et al., 2012; Tavola et al., 2012).
Previous human studies with 11C- or 18F-choline were limited up to 1 h after admin-
istration (Roivainen et al., 2000; DeGrado et al., 2002; Schmid et al., 2005; Kwee
et al., 2006; Steiner et al., 2009; Sutinen et al., 2004).
(C50) The biokinetics of 11C-choline and 18F-choline differ due to the different
interactions of carbon and fluorine in the organism. A paper with dosimetric data on
11
C-choline has been published by Tolvanen et al. (2010), and the biokinetics and
dosimetry of 11C-choline will be subject to further evaluation by ICRP.
18
C.14.2. References for F-choline
Ackerstaff, E., Glunde, K., Bhujwalla, Z., 2003. Choline phospholipid metabolism: a target in
cancer cells? J. Cell Biochem. 90, 525–533.
DeGrado, T.R., Reiman, R.E., Price, D.T., Shuyan, W., Coleman, R.E., 2002.
Pharmacokinetics and radiation dosimetry of 18F-fluorocholine. J. Nucl. Med. 43, 92–96.
Giussani, A., Janzen, T., Uusijärvi-Lizana, H., et al., 2012. A compartmental model for
biokinetics and dosimetry of 18F-choline in prostate cancer patients. J. Nucl. Med. 53,
985–993.
Hoeschen, C., Mattsson, S., Cantone, M-C., et al., 2010. Minimising activity and dose with
enhanced image quality by radiopharmaceutical administrations. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 139,
250–253.
Janzen, T., Tavola, F., Giussani, A., et al., 2010. Compartmental model of 18F-choline. In:
Molthen, R.C., Weaver, J.B. (Eds.), Medical Imaging 2010, Biomedical Applications in
Molecular, Structural, and Functional Imaging. SPIE, Bellingham, WA.
Kwee, S.A., Wei, H., Sesterhenn, I., Yun, D., Coel, M.N., 2006. Localization of primary
prostate cancer with dual-phase 18F-fluorocholine PET. J. Nucl. Med. 47, 262–269.
104
Roivainen, A., Forsback, S., Grönroos, T., et al., 2000. Blood metabolism of [methyl-11C]
choline; implications for in vivo imaging with positron emission tomography. Eur. J. Nucl.
Med. Mol. Imag. 27, 25–32.
Ramirez de Molina, A., Rodriguez-Gonzalez, A., Gutierrez, R., et al., 2002. Overexpression of
choline kinase is a frequent feature in human tumor-derived cell lines and in lung, prostate,
and colorectal human cancers. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 296, 580–583.
Schmid, D.T., John, H., Zweifel, R., et al., 2005. Fluorocholine PET/CT in patients with
prostate cancer: initial experience. Radiology 235, 623–628.
Steiner, C., Vees, H., Zaidi, H., et al., 2009. Three-phase 18F-fluorocholine PET/CT in the
evaluation of prostate cancer recurrence. Nuklearmedizin 48, 1–9.
Sutinen, E., Nurmi, M., Roivainen, A., et al., 2004. Kinetics of [11C]choline uptake in prostate
cancer: a PET study. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imag. 31, 317–324.
Tavola, F., Janzen, T., Giussani, A., et al., 2012. Non-linear compartmental model of 18F-
choline. Nucl. Med. Biol. 39, 261–268.
Tolvanen, T., Yli-Kerttula, T., Ujula, T., et al., 2010. Biodistribution and radiation dosimetry
of [11C]choline: a comparison between rat and human data. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imag.
37, 874–883.
Uusijärvi, H., Nilsson, L.E., Bjartell, A., Mattsson, S., 2010. Biokinetics of 18F-choline studied
in four prostate cancer patients. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 139, 240–244.
18
Table C.28. Biokinetic data for F-choline.
105
18
Table C.29. Absorbed doses for F-choline.
106
18
C.15.2. References for F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose
Deloar, H.M., Fujiwara, T., Shidahara, M., et al., 1998. Estimation of absorbed dose for 2-[F-
18]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose using whole-body positron emission tomography and mag-
netic resonance imaging. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. 25, 565–574.
Hays, M.T., Segall, G.M., 1999. A mathematical model for the distribution of fluorodeox-
yglucose in humans. J. Nucl. Med. 40, 1358–1366.
Hays, M.T., Watson, E.E., Thomas, S.R., Stabin, M., 2002. Radiation absorbed dose esti-
mates from 18F-FDG. MIRD Dose Estimate Report No. 19. J. Nucl. Med. 43, 210–214.
ICRP, 1987. Radiation dose to patients from radiopharmaceuticals. ICRP Publication 53.
Ann. ICRP 18(1–4).
ICRP, 2008. Radiation dose to patients from radiopharmaceuticals. ICRP Publication 106.
Addendum 3 to ICRP Publication 53. Ann. ICRP 28(3).
107
Meija, A.A., Nakamura, T., Masatoshi, I., Hatazawa, J., Mazaki, M., Watanuki, S., 1991.
Estimation of absorbed doses in humans due to intraveneous administration of fluorine-18-
fluorodeoxyglucose in PET studies. J. Nucl. Med. 32, 699–706.
18
Table C.30. Biokinetic data for F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose.
108
18
Table C.31. Absorbed doses for F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose.
109
110
111
112
113
114
Luxen, A., Guillaume, M., Melega, W.P., Pike, V.W., Solin, O., Wagner, R., 1992. Production
of 6 [18F]fluoro-L-DOPA and its metabolism in vivo – a critical review. Nucl. Med. Biol. 19,
149–158.
Melega, W.P., Hoffman, J.M., Luxen, A., Nissenson, C.H.K., Phelps, M.E., Barrio, J.P.,
1990. The effects of carbidopa on the metabolism of 6-[18F]fluoro-L-dopa in rats, monkeys
and humans. Life Sci. 47, 149–157.
Meyer, G-J., Waters, S.L., Coenen, H.H., Luxen, A., Maziere, B., Långström, B., 1995. PET
radiopharmaceuticals in Europe: current use and data relevant for the formulation of
summaries of product characteristics (SPCs). Eur. J. Nucl. Med. 22, 1420–1432.
Pauwels, T., Dethy, S., Goldman, S., Monclus, M., Luxen, A., 1994. Effect of catechol-O-
methyl transferase inhibition on peripheral and central metabolism of 6-[18F]fluoro-L-
DOPA. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 257, 53–58.
115
116
(C63) Considering the high uptake in mineral bone, and given that the skeleton
model has been improved considerably since Publication 53 (ICRP, 1987) was pub-
lished, ICRP has re-reviewed the literature and proposes a new biokinetic model and
a new dose table for this substance.
(C64) 18F-fluoride is a highly effective bone-seeking PET tracer used for the
detection of skeletal abnormalities (Fair et al., 2010). The uptake mechanism of
18
F-fluoride resembles that of 99mTc-methylene diphosphonate, but has better
pharmacokinetic characteristics, including faster blood clearance and two-fold
higher uptake in bone. Uptake of 18F-fluoride reflects blood flow and bone
remodelling. The proposed biokinetic model is mainly based on the compartment
model of Blake et al. (2001) and Park-Holohan et al. (2001). Additional infor-
mation was extracted from Hawkins et al. (1992) and Doot et al. (2010). The
Task Group has agreed on the following simple model: with a 15-min uptake
half-time, the fraction of the administered activity in the skeleton is estimated to
be 60%. Retention on the bone surface is considered to be infinitive.
The immediate uptake of 40% of the administered activity in other organs and
tissues is assumed to be retained with biological half-times of 15 min (75%) and
13 h (25%).
18
C.18.2. References for F-fluoride
Blake, G.M., Park-Holohan, S., Cook, G.J.R., Fogelman, I., 2001. Quantitative studies of
bone with use of 18F-fluoride and 99mTc-methylene diphosphonate. Sem. Nucl. Med. 31,
28–49.
Doot, R.K., Muzi, M., Peterson, L.M., et al., 2010. Kinetic analysis of 18F-fluoride PET
images of breast cancer bone metastases. J. Nucl. Med. 51, 521–527.
Fair, J., Sajdak, R., Smith, G.T., 2010. SNM practice guideline for sodium 18F-fluoride PET/
CT bone scans. J. Nucl. Med. 51, 1813–1820.
Hawkins, R.A., Choi, Y., Huang, S-C., et al., 1992. Evaluation of the skeletal kinetics of
fluorine-18-fluoride ion with PET. J. Nucl. Med. 33, 633–642.
ICRP, 1987. Radiation dose to patients from radiopharmaceuticals. ICRP Publication 53.
Ann. ICRP 18(1–4).
Park-Holohan, S-J., Blake, G.M., Fogelman, I., 2001. Quantitative studies of bone using 18F-
fluoride and 99mTc-methylene diphosphonate: evaluation of renal and whole-blood
kinetics. Nucl. Med. Commun. 22, 1037–1044.
117
18
Table C.36. Biokinetic data for F-fluoride.
118
18
Table C.37. Absorbed doses of F-fluoride.
119
120
for the retention times in the various organs and tissues, a biological half-time of 24 h
is assumed for all tissues. It is further assumed that 15% of the total radioactivity
would be eliminated in the urine.
121
122
123
51
C.20.2. References for Cr-ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid
Bjarnason, I., Peters, T.J., Veall, N., 1983. A persistent defect in intestinal permeability in
coeliac disease demonstrated by a 51Cr-labelled EDTA absorption test. Lancet 321,
323–325.
Briichner-Mortensen, J., Giese, J., Rossing, N., 1969. Renal inulin clearance versus total
plasma clearance of 51Cr-EDTA. J. Lab. Clin. Invest. 23, 301–305.
ICRP, 1987. Radiation dose to patients from radiopharmaceuticals. ICRP Publication 53.
Ann. ICRP 18(1–4).
ICRP, 1998. Radiation dose to patients from radiopharmaceuticals. Addendum 2 to ICRP
Publication 53. ICRP Publication 80. Ann. ICRP 28(3).
Chantler, C., Garnett, E.S., Parsons, V., Veall, N., 1969. Glomerular filtration rate measure-
ment in man by the single injection method using 51Cr-EDTA. Clin. Sci. 37, 169–180.
O’Reilly, P.H., Shields, R.A., Testa, H.J., 1979. Nuclear Medicine in Urology and
Nephrology. Butterworths, London.
124
51
Table C.40. Biokinetic data for Cr-ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid.
125
51
Table C.41. Absorbed doses for Cr-ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid.
126
127
128
(C75) The biokinetic model given in MIRD Dose Estimate Report No. 2 (MIRD,
1973), which is based on human data, is adopted here without change. In children,
the bone uptake is predominantly in the metaphyseal growth zones; this is discussed
in Section A.6, Paragraph A25.
(C76) The activity excreted via faeces (0.09) is assumed to have entered the
bowel in the small intestine. The mean residence times in the gut are those of the
standard gastrointestinal tract model [see Section A.3 in Publication 53 (ICRP,
1987)].
67
C.21.2. References for Ga-citrate
ICRP, 1987. Radiation dose to patients from radiopharmaceuticals. ICRP Publication 53.
Ann. ICRP 18(1–4).
MIRD, 1973. Summary of current radiation dose estimates to humans from 66Ga-, 67Ga-,
68
Ga- and 72Ga-citrate. MIRD Dose Estimate Report No. 2. J. Nucl. Med. 14, 755–756.
129
67
Table C.42. Biokinetic data for Ga-citrate.
130
67
Table C.43. Absorbed doses for Ga-citrate.
131
68
c.22.2. Reference for Ga-labelled ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid
ICRP, 1987. Radiation dose to patients from radiopharmaceuticals. ICRP Publication 53.
Ann. ICRP 18(1–4).
68
Table C.44. Biokinetic data for Ga-labelled ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid.
132
68
Table C.45. Absorbed doses for Ga-labelled ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid.
133
(C78) The generic biokinetic model for 75Se-labelled amino acids is the same as the
generic biokinetic model for 11C-labelled amino acids (see Section C.3.1). For details,
please see Bergmann et al. (1995), Coenen et al. (1989), Cottrall et al. (1973), Deloar
et al. (1998), ICRP (1987, 2008), Inoue et al. (1998), Schmidt et al. (1997), Shoup
et al. (1999), Stenhouse and Baxter (1977), Stenstrüm et al. (1996), Taylor (2000),
and Taylor et al. (1973).
75
C.23.2. References for Se-labelled amino acids (generic model)
Bergmann, R., Brust, P., Kampf, G., Coenen, H.H., Stöcklin, G., 1995. Evaluation of radio-
selenium labeled selenomethionine, a potential tracer for brain protein synthesis by PET.
Nucl. Med. Biol. 22, 475–481.
Coenen, H.H., Kling, P., Stöcklin, G., 1989. Cerebral metabolism of l-[2-18F]fluorotyrosine, a
new PET tracer of protein synthesis. J. Nucl. Med. 30, 1367–1372.
Cottrall, M.F., Taylor, D.M., McElwain, T.J., 1973. Investigations of 18F-p-fluorophenylala-
nine for pancreas scanning. Br. J. Radiol. 46, 277–288.
Deloar, H.M., Fujiwara, T., Nakamura, T., et al., 1998. Estimation of internal absorbed dose
of l-[methyl-11C] methionine using whole body positron emission tomography. Eur. J.
Nucl. Med. 25, 629–633.
ICRP, 1987. Radiation dose to patients from radiopharmaceuticals. ICRP Publication 53.
Ann. ICRP 18(1–4).
ICRP, 2008. Radiation dose to patients from radiopharmaceuticals. Addendum 3 to ICRP
Publication 53. Ann. ICRP 38(1/2).
Inoue, T., Tomiyoshi, K., Higuichi, T., et al., 1998. Biodistribution studies on l-3-[fluorine-
18]fluoro-a-methyl tyrosine: a potential tumor-detecting agent. J. Nucl. Med. 39, 663–667.
Schmidt, D., Langen, K-J., Herzog, H., et al., 1997. Whole-body kinetics and dosimetry of l-3-
[123I]iodo-a-methyltyrosine. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. 24, 1162–1166.
Shoup, T.M., Olson, J., Hoffman, J.M., et al., 1999. Synthesis and evaluation of [18F]1-amino-
3-fluorocyclobutane-1-carboxylic acid to image brain tumours. J. Nucl. Med. 40, 331–338.
Stenhouse, M.J., Baxter, M.S., 1977. Bomb 14C as a biological tracer. Nature (Lond.) 267,
828–832.
Stenström, K., Leide-Svegborn, S., Erlandsson, B., et al., 1996. Application of accelerator
mass spectrometry (AMS) for high-sensitivity measurements of 14CO2 in long-term studies
of fat metabolism. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 47, 417–422.
Taylor, D.M., 2000. Generic models for radionuclide dosimetry: 11C, 18F or 75Se-labelled
amino acids. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 52, 911–922.
Taylor, D.M., Cottrall, M.F., 1973. Evaluation of amino acids labelled with 18F for pancreas
scanning. In: Radiopharmaceuticals and Labelled Compounds. Vol. I. IAEA, Vienna, pp.
443–441.
Wester, H.J., Herz, M., Senkowitsch-Schmidtke, R., Schwaiger, M., Stöcklin, G., Hamacher,
K., 1999a. Preclinical evaluation of 4-[18F]fluoroprolines: diasteromeric effect on metabo-
lism and uptake in mice. Nucl. Med. Biol. 26, 259–265.
Wester, H.J., Herz, M., Weber, W., et al., 1999b. Synthesis and radiopharmacology of O-(2-
[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine for tumor imaging. J. Nucl. Med. 40, 205–212.
134
75
Table C.46. Biokinetic data for Se-labelled amino acids (generic model).
135
75
Table C.47. Absorbed doses for Se-labelled amino acids (generic model).
136
(C79) Tauroselcholic acid (SeHCAT) is a bile acid analogue used to study various
aspects of the enterohepatic circulation. Following oral administration, approxi-
mately 95% of the bile acid is absorbed in normal humans (Heaton, 1976), mainly
by the terminal ileum, during each enterohepatic cycle, and is almost entirely con-
fined to the lumen of the biliary ducts, gut, and liver (Nyhlin et al., 1983). SeHCAT
first appears in the gallbladder, on average, 73 min after oral administration (Jazrawi
et al., 1984), and the substance undergoes enterohepatic circulation approximately
five times each day (Merrick et al., 1985). The distribution of the bile acid pool in the
fasting state and postprandially was measured by Jazrawi et al. (1984), and was 30%,
62%, and 8%, on average, in gallbladder, small intestine, and liver, respectively.
Whole-body retention data from normal subjects (Nyhlin et al., 1983) showed that
97–100% of the bile acid was excreted with a half-time of 2.6 days and that, in most
cases, a small component of approximately 3% was slowly eliminated with a mean
half-time of 62 days.
(C80) Based on the above data, the biokinetic model for the normal case assumes
that a fraction (0.97) of orally administered 75SeHCAT circulates within the enter-
ohepatic system, and that a fraction (0.95) of this is absorbed by the terminal ileum
during each cycle. The mean transit time through the small intestine prior to absorp-
tion is assumed to be 3 h and, on the basis of bile acid pool distribution, the transit
times through liver and gallbladder are 0.4 and 1.4 h, respectively. These conditions
lead to a total body retention half-time of 2.7 days. The small fraction of the sub-
stance transferred to the large intestine on each cycle is excreted according to the
gastrointestinal tract model. The residual fraction (0.03) of the administered sub-
stance is assumed to be distributed uniformly in the total body and retained with a
half-time of 62 days.
(C81) In most clinical investigations for which this substance is used (e.g.
Crohn’s disease), the effects of impaired ileal absorption and shorter gastrointest-
inal transit time tend to reduce the dose commitment compared with the normal
case. However, in patients with severe cholestatic jaundice, the liver dose has been
estimated to be approximately 100 times the normal value (Soundy et al., 1982).
75
C.24.2. References for Se-labelled bile acid
Heaton, K.W., 1976. Clinical aspects of bile acid metabolism. Rec. Adv. Gastroenterol. 3,
199–230.
Jazrawi, R.P., Lanzini, A., Britten, A., Meller, S.T., Northfield, T.C., 1984. Dynamics of
gallbladder function and of the enterohepatic circulation studied by g labelled bile acid.
Clin. Sci. 66, 10P.
Merrick, M.V., Eastwood, M.A., Ford, J.J., 1985. Is bile acid malabsorption underdiagnosed?
An evaluation of accuracy of diagnosis by measurement of SeHCAT retention. BMJ 290,
665–668.
137
Nyhlin, H., Merrick, M.V., Eastwood, M.A., Brydon, W.G., 1983. Evaluation of ileal func-
tion using 23-selena-25-homotaurocholate, a g-labeled conjugated bile acid.
Gastroenterology 84, 63–68.
Soundy, R.G., Simpson, J.D., Ross, H.M., Merrick, M.V., 1982. Absorbed dose to man from
the Se-75 labeled conjugated bile salt SeHCAT. J. Nucl. Med. 23, 157–161.
75
Table C.48. Biokinetic data for Se-labelled bile acid.
138
75
Table C.49. Absorbed doses for Se-labelled bile acid.
139
140
141
82
Table C.50. Biokinetic data for Rb-chloride.
Adrenals 4.6E05
Brain 1.8E04
Breast 4.9E05
Gallbladder wall 5.9E05
Gastrointestinal tract
Stomach wall 3.5E04
Small intestine wall 1.8E03
Upper large intestine wall 4.5E04
Lower large intestine wall 2.9E04
Heart contents 1.3E03
Heart wall 9.4E04
Kidneys 3.3E03
Liver 1.8E03
Lungs 2.9E03
Muscles 4.7E03
Ovaries 4.1E06
Pancreas 2.8E04
Bone (cortical) 1.5E04
Bone (trabecular) 2.2E04
Red marrow 4.3E04
Spleen 6.2E04
Testes 6.4E06
Thyroid 3.8E05
Urinary bladder contents 4.4E05
Uterus 8.7E05
Other organs and tissues 1.1E02
142
82
Table C.51. Absorbed doses for Rb-chloride.
143
(C86) Apcitide is a peptide that binds to the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor on the
surface of activated platelets; a major component of active thrombus formation.
Apcitide is used for the detection and localisation of acute venous thrombosis in
the lower extremities (Taillefer et al., 2000). A biokinetic model with distribution in
circulating blood and an effective half-life equal to the physical half-life is assumed.
99m
C.26.2. Reference for Tc-apcitide
Taillefer, R., Edell, S., Innes, G., Lister-James, J.; Multicenter Trial Investigators, 2000. Acute
thromboscintigraphy with 99mTc-apcitide: results of the phase 3 multicenter clinical trial
comparing 99mTc-apcitide scintigraphy with contrast venography for imaging acute DVT.
J. Nucl. Med. 41, 1214–1223.
99m
Table C.52. Biokinetic data for Tc-apcitide.
144
99m
Table C.53. Absorbed doses for Tc-apcitide.
145
(C87) These are defined in Section A.8 in Publication 53 (ICRP, 1987) for two
types of 99mTc-labelled colloids:
. large colloids (100–1000 nm) – sulphur colloid, tin colloid, micro-aggregated
albumin, and phytate; and
. small colloids (<100 nm) – mini-/micro-aggregated albumin and antimony sul-
phide colloid.
99m
Due to the short physical half-life of Tc, it is assumed that no redistribution or
excretion occurs.
99m
C.27.2. Reference for Tc-labelled large colloids
ICRP, 1987. Radiation dose to patients from radiopharmaceuticals. ICRP Publication 53.
Ann. ICRP 18(1–4).
99m
Table C.54. Biokinetic data for Tc-labelled large colloids.
146
99m
Table C.55. Absorbed doses for Tc-labelled large colloids.
147
148
149
99m
C.28.2. References for Tc-labelled small colloids (intratumoural injection)
Bronskill, M.J., 1983. Radiation dose estimates for interstitial radiocolloid lymphoscintigra-
phy. Small colloids. Semin. Nucl. Med. 13, 20–25.
Eshima, D., Fauconnier, T., Eshima, L., et al., 2000. Radiopharmaceuticals for lymphoscinti-
graphy; including dosimetry and radiation considerations. Semin. Nucl. Med. 30, 25–32.
Wilhelm, A.J., Mijnhout, G.S., Franssen, J., 1999. Radiopharmaceuticals in sentinel lymph-
node detection – an overview. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. 26(Suppl.), S36–S42.
99m
Table C.56. Biokinetic data for Tc-labelled small colloids (intratumoural injection).
Time to removal: 6 h
Breast 1.0 4.3
Time to removal: 18 h
Breast 1.0 7.6
150
99m
Table C.57. Absorbed doses for Tc-labelled small colloids (intratumoural injection).
6 h to removal 18 h to removal
151
99m
C.29.2. References for Tc-dimercaptosuccinic acid
Arnold, R.W., Subramanian, G., McAfee, J.G., Blair, R.J., Thomas, F.D., 1975. Comparison
of 99mTc complexes for renal imaging. J. Nucl. Med. 16, 357–367.
Elliott, A.T., Britton, K.E., Brown, N.J.G., Pearce, P.C., Smith, F.R., Barnasconi, E.W.,
1976. Dosimetry of current radiopharmaceuticals used in renal investigation. In:
Proceedings of the Radiopharmaceutical Dosimetry Symposium, 26–29 April 1976, Oak
Ridge, TN, USA. HEW Publication (FDA) 768044. US Department of Health and
Welfare, Washington, DC, pp. 293–304.
Enlander, D., Weber, P.M., dos Remedios, L.V., 1974. Renal cortical imaging in 35 patients:
superior quality with 99mTc-DMSA. J. Nucl. Med. 15, 743–749.
Handmaker, H., Young, B.W., Lowenstein, J.M., 1975. Clinical experience with 99mTc-DMSA
[dimercaptosuccinic acid], a new renal imaging agent. J. Nucl. Med. 16, 28–32.
99m
Table C.58. Biokinetic data for Tc-dimercaptosuccinic acid.
152
99m
Table C.59. Absorbed doses for Tc-dimercaptosuccinic acid.
153
99m
C.30.2. References for Tc-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid
ICRP, 1987. Radiation dose to patients from radiopharmaceuticals. ICRP Publication 53.
Ann. ICRP 18(1–4).
Klopper, J.F., Hauser, W., Atkins, H.L., Eckelman, W.C., Richards, P., 1972. Evaluation of
99m
T-DTPA for the measurement of glomerular filtration rate. J. Nucl. Med. 13, 107–110.
McAfee, J.G., Gagne, G., Atkins, H.L., et al., 1979. Biological distribution and excretion of
DTPA labelled with Tc-99m and In-111. J. Nucl. Med. 20, 1273–1278.
O’Reilly, P.H., Shields, R.A., Testa, H.J., 1979. Nuclear Medicine in Urology and
Nephrology. Butterworths, London.
154
99m
Table C.60. Biokinetic data for Tc-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid.
155
99m
Table C.61. Absorbed doses for Tc-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid.
156
157
(C97) 99mTc-ethylenedicysteine (EC) is used for renal studies. The biokinetic beha-
viour of the substance is very similar to that of Hippuran (sodium orthoiodohippu-
rate) with a half-time in the total body of 25 min (ICRP, 1987). The cumulated
amount found in urine at different times is as follows: 40 min, 70%; 60 min, 80%;
and 90 min, 95% (Surma et al., 1994; Surma, 1998a, 1998b; Liniecki, 1998). The
clearance is approximately 70% of that of Hippuran.
99m
C.31.2. References for Tc-ethylenedicysteine
ICRP, 1987. Radiation dose to patients from radiopharmaceuticals. ICRP Publication 53.
Ann. ICRP 18(1–4).
Liniecki, J., 1998. Private communication. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical
University of Lodz, Lodz.
Surma, M.J., 1998a. Verification of 99mTc-ethylenedicysteine (99mTc-EC) distribution model in
the organism. Nucl. Med. Rev. 1, 29–32.
Surma, M.J., 1998b. 99mTc-Ethylenedicysteine (99mTc-EC) renal clearance determination error
for the multiple- and single-sample methods. Nucl. Med. Rev. 1, 33–40.
Surma, M.J., Wiewiora, J., Liniecki, J., 1994. Usefulness of 99mTc-N,N0 -ethylene-1-dicysteine
complex for dynamic kidney investigations. Nucl. Med. Comm. 15, 628–635.
158
99m
Table C.62. Biokinetic data for Tc-ethylenedicysteine.
159
99m
Table C.63. Absorbed doses for Tc-ethylenedicysteine.
160
161
162
99m
C.32.2. References for Tc-ethylenedicysteine diester
Barthel, H., Wiener, M., Dannenberg, C., Bettin, S., Sattler, B., Knapp, W.H., 1997. Age-
specific cerebral perfusion in 4- to 15-year-old children: a high-resolution brain SPET study
using 99mTc-ECD. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. 24, 1245–1252.
Holman, B.L., Hellman, R.S., Goldsmith, S.J., et al., 1989. Biodistribution, dosimetry and
clinical evaluation of technetium-99m ethyl cysteinate dimer in normal subjects and in
patients with chronic cerebral infarction. J. Nucl. Med. 30, 1018–1024.
ICRP, 1987. Radiation dose to patients from radiopharmaceuticals. ICRP Publication 53.
Ann. ICRP 18(1–4).
Léveillé, J., Demonceau, G., Walovitch, R.C., 1992. Intrasubject comparison between tech-
netium-99m-ECD and technetium-99m-HMPAO in healthy human subjects. J. Nucl. Med.
33, 480–484.
Vallabhajosula, S., Zimmerman, R.E., Picard, M., et al., 1989. Technetium-99m ECD: a new
brain imaging agent. In vivo kinetics and biodistribution studies in normal human subjects.
J. Nucl. Med. 30, 599–604.
163
99m
Table C.64. Biokinetic data for Tc-ethylenedicysteine diester.
164
99m
Table C.65. Absorbed doses for Tc-ethylenedicysteine diester.
165
(C102) [Trans-1,2-bis(dihydro-2,2,5,5-tetramethyl-3(2H)furanone-4-methylenei-
mino ethane) bis tris(3-methoxy-1propyl)–phosphine] technetium (III)-99 m is a
non-reducible complex of Tc(III). 99mTc-furifosmin is prepared from a freeze-dried
kit (TechneCard) and is used for studies of myocardial perfusion.
(C103) 99mTc-furifosmin accumulates in viable myocardial tissue in proportion to
regional blood flow in a manner similar to thallous chloride. After intravenous injec-
tion, the substance is cleared rapidly from the blood (<5% left by 20 min) and taken
up predominantly in muscular tissues (including heart), liver, and kidneys.
Biodistribution is generally similar to that of 99mTc-methyl oxy-isobutyl-isonitrile
(MIBI, Cardiolite) (ICRP, 1991) and 99mTc-tetrofosmin (Myoview; ICRP, 1998),
but there are some differences which have a bearing on diagnostic technique. 99mTc-
furifosmin shows a heart uptake of 1.2–2.4%. It is cleared rapidly from the liver
(<6.5% left by 1 h), and lung uptake is low (4%). More than 50% of the substance
has entered excretory pathways by 24 h and the faecal:urinary excretion ratio is 60:40.
(C104) It is assumed that the fractions of the substance taken up by the liver
and kidneys are excreted in faeces and urine, respectively. When the substance is
injected in conjunction with an exercise stress test, there is little change in heart
uptake, and biodistribution is similar to that observed at rest. The initial rate of
urinary clearance is lower than at rest, and the same faecal:urinary excretion ratio
is assumed.
(C105) The quantitative figures for uptake and excretion in man, presented in
Table C.66, are based on the rest and exercise studies of Rossetti et al. (1994) with
supplementary information from Gerson et al. (1994). Substance excreted by the
hepatobiliary system is assumed to leave the body via the intestinal tract according
to the ICRP model for the gastrointestinal tract (ICRP, 1979).
(C106) The biodistribution and excretion data used to derive this model were
based on a small number of subjects (seven at rest and three after exercise), with
the result that significant differences between rest and exercise data could not be
established. The difference between the biokinetic data tables presented for rest
and exercise studies is therefore largely based on experience of models for similar
99m
Tc-labelled myocardial perfusion imaging agents such as MIBI and
tetrofosmin.
99m
C.33.2. References for Tc-furifosmin
Gerson, M.C., Lukes, J., Deutsch, E., et al., 1994. Comparison of technetium 99m Q12 and
thallium 201 for detection of angiographically documented coronary artery disease in
humans. J. Nucl. Cardiol. 1, 499–508.
ICRP, 1979. Limits for intakes of radionuclides by workers. ICRP Publication 30, Part 1.
Ann. ICRP 2(3/4).
166
167
99m
Table C.66. Biokinetic data for Tc-furifosmin.
Resting subject
Heart wall 0.024 6.0 0.67 0.13
24 0.33
Lungs 0.04 24 1.0 0.28
Kidneys 0.052 1.0 0.5 0.21
24 0.5
Liver 0.07 6.0 1.0 0.30
Other organs and tissues 0.814 0.42 0.48 3.4
36 0.52
Gallbladder contents 0.20 0.35
Gastrointestinal tract contents
Small intestine 0.60 0.72
Upper large intestine 0.60 0.94
Lower large intestine 0.60 0.46
Urinary bladder contents 0.40
Adult, 15 years, 10 years 0.47
5 years 0.40
1 year 0.26
Exercise
Heart wall 0.027 6.0 0.67 0.14
24 0.33
Lungs 0.04 24 1.0 0.28
Kidneys 0.06 1.3 0.75 0.23
24 0.25
Liver 0.08 6.0 1.0 0.26
Other organs and tissues 0.793 1.0 0.45 4.0
96 0.55
Gallbladder contents 0.20 0.29
Gastrointestinal tract contents
Small intestine 0.60 0.59
Upper large intestine 0.60 0.77
Lower large intestine 0.60 0.38
Urinary bladder contents 0.40
Adult, 15 years, 10 years 0.38
5 years 0.32
1 year 0.21
168
99m
Table C.67. Absorbed doses for Tc-furifosmin.
Resting subject
Adrenals 4.3E03 5.5E03 8.4E03 1.2E02 2.1E02
Bone surfaces 5.1E03 6.2E03 9.1E03 1.3E02 2.4E02
Brain 1.6E03 2.0E03 3.3E03 5.3E03 9.3E03
Breast 1.8E03 2.2E03 3.5E03 5.7E03 1.1E02
Gallbladder wall 5.1E02 5.7E02 7.5E02 1.3E01 4.4E01
Gastrointestinal tract
Stomach wall 4.6E03 6.2E03 1.0E02 1.5E02 2.6E02
Small intestine wall 1.9E02 2.4E02 3.9E02 6.1E02 1.1E01
Colon wall 3.2E02 4.1E02 6.8E02 1.1E01 1.9E01
(Upper large intestine wall 3.6E02 4.7E02 7.7E02 1.2E01 2.2E01)
(Lower large intestine wall 2.6E02 3.3E02 5.5E02 8.8E02 1.6E01)
Heart wall 7.8E03 1.0E02 1.5E02 2.3E02 4.0E02
Kidneys 1.4E02 1.7E02 2.3E02 3.4E02 5.8E02
Liver 6.9E03 8.8E03 1.3E02 1.9E02 3.4E02
Lungs 5.5E03 7.8E03 1.1E02 1.7E02 3.1E02
Muscles 3.1E03 3.9E03 5.8E03 8.7E03 1.5E02
Oesophagus 2.5E03 3.2E03 4.6E03 7.1E03 1.3E02
Ovaries 1.0E02 1.3E02 1.9E02 2.8E02 4.6E02
Pancreas 5.1E03 6.6E03 1.1E02 1.7E02 2.7E02
Red marrow 3.7E03 4.4E03 6.4E03 8.7E03 1.4E02
Skin 1.7E03 2.0E03 3.1E03 5.0E03 9.3E03
Spleen 3.6E03 4.7E03 7.4E03 1.1E02 2.0E02
Testes 2.7E03 3.5E03 5.7E03 8.8E03 1.5E02
Thymus 2.5E03 3.2E03 4.6E03 7.1E03 1.3E02
Thyroid 2.0E03 2.6E03 4.2E03 6.7E03 1.2E02
Urinary bladder wall 2.2E02 2.9E02 4.2E02 5.5E02 7.1E02
Uterus 8.8E03 1.1E02 1.7E02 2.5E02 3.9E02
Remaining organs 3.8E03 4.9E03 7.6E03 1.2E02 2.0E02
169
Exercise
Adrenals 4.5E03 5.7E03 8.7E03 1.3E02 2.2E02
Bone surfaces 5.5E03 6.6E03 9.7E03 1.4E02 2.6E02
Brain 1.9E03 2.4E03 3.9E03 6.3E03 1.1E02
Breast 2.0E03 2.5E03 3.9E03 6.2E03 1.2E02
Gallbladder wall 4.3E02 4.9E02 6.3E02 1.1E01 3.6E01
Gastrointestinal tract
Stomach wall 4.6E03 6.2E03 1.0E02 1.5E02 2.5E02
Small intestine wall 1.6E02 2.1E02 3.3E02 5.1E02 9.2E02
Colon wall 2.7E02 3.4E02 5.7E02 8.9E02 1.7E01
(Upper large intestine wall 3.0E02 3.9E02 6.4E02 1.0E01 1.9E01)
(Lower large intestine wall 2.2E02 2.8E02 4.7E02 7.4E02 1.4E01)
Heart wall 8.7E03 1.1E02 1.7E02 2.5E02 4.4E02
Kidneys 1.5E02 1.8E02 2.5E02 3.6E02 6.1E02
Liver 6.3E03 7.9E03 1.2E02 1.7E02 3.0E02
Lungs 5.6E03 8.0E03 1.1E02 1.7E02 3.1E02
Muscles 3.2E03 4.0E03 6.0E03 9.0E03 1.6E02
Oesophagus 2.9E03 3.6E03 5.2E03 8.1E03 1.4E02
Ovaries 9.2E03 1.2E02 1.7E02 2.5E02 4.2E02
Pancreas 5.2E03 6.7E03 1.1E02 1.6E02 2.7E02
Red marrow 3.7E03 4.5E03 6.6E03 9.1E03 1.5E02
Skin 1.8E03 2.2E03 3.4E03 5.5E03 1.0E02
Spleen 3.9E03 4.9E03 7.8E03 1.2E02 2.1E02
Testes 2.8E03 3.6E03 5.7E03 8.9E03 1.5E02
Thymus 2.9E03 3.6E03 5.2E03 8.1E03 1.4E02
Thyroid 2.4E03 3.0E03 4.9E03 7.8E03 1.4E02
Urinary bladder wall 1.8E02 2.3E02 3.4E02 4.4E02 5.8E02
Uterus 7.9E03 9.9E03 1.5E02 2.2E02 3.6E02
Remaining organs 3.8E03 4.9E03 7.5E03 1.2E02 2.0E02
170
99m
C.34.2. References for Tc-labelled human immunoglobulin
Buscombe, J.R., Lui, D., Ensing, G., et al., 1990. 99mTc-human immunoglobulin (HIG) – first
results of a new agent for the localisation of infection and inflammation. Eur. J. Nucl. Med.
16, 649–655.
Corstens, F.H.M., Claessens, R.A.M.J., 1992. Imaging inflammation with polyclonal immu-
noglobulin: not looked for but discovered. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. 19, 155–158.
Datz, F.L., Castronovo, F.P., Christian, P.E., et al., 1995. Biodistribution and dosimetry of
indium-111-polyclonal IgG in normal subjects. J. Nucl. Med. 36, 2372–2379.
Hovi, I., Taavitsainen, M., Lantto, T., et al., 1993. Technetium-99m-HMPAO-labeled leuko-
cytes and technetium-99m-labelled human polyclonal immunoglobulin G in diagnosis of
focal purulent disease. J. Nucl. Med. 9, 1428–1434.
171
ICRP, 1975. A Report of the Task Group on Reference Man. ICRP Publication 23. Pergamon
Press, Oxford.
Kinne, R.W., Becker, W., Schwab, J., et al., 1993. Comparison of 99Tcm-labelled specific
murine anti-CD4 monoclonal antibodies and non-specific human immunoglobulin for
imaging inflamed joints in rheumatoid arthritis. Nucl. Med. Comm. 14, 667–675.
Saptogino, A., Becker, W., Wolf, F., 1991. Biokinetics and estimation of dose from 99Tcm
labelled polyclonal human immunoglobulin (HIG). Nuklearmedizin 30, 18–23.
Sciuk, J., Brandau, W., Vollet, B., et al., 1991. Comparison of technetium-99m polyclonal
human immunoglobulin and technetium-99m monoclonal antibodies for imaging chronic
osteomyelitis. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. 18, 401–407.
Solomon, A., Waldmann, T.A., Fahey, J.L., 1963. Metabolism of normal 6,6 S g-globulin in
normal subjects and in patients with macroglobulinemia and multiple myeloma. J. Lab.
Clin. Med. 62, 1–17.
99m
Table C.68. Biokinetic data for Tc-labelled human immunoglobulin.
172
99m
Table C.69. Absorbed doses for Tc-labelled human immunoglobulin.
173
99m
C.35.2. References for Tc-labelled hexamethylpropyleneamineoxine
Costa, D.C., Ell, P.J., Cullum, I.D., et al., 1986. The in vivo distribution of 99mTc-HM-PAO in
normal man. Nucl. Med. Comm. 7, 647–658.
ICRP, 1987. Radiation dose to patients from radiopharmaceuticals. ICRP Publication 53.
Ann. ICRP 18(1–4).
Sharp, P.F., Smith, F.W., Gemmel, H.G., et al., 1986. Technetium-99m HM-PAO stereoi-
somers as potential agents for imaging regional cerebral blood flow: human volunteer
studies. J. Nucl. Med. 27, 171–177.
Soundy, R.G., Tyrrell, D.A., Pickett, R.D., et al., 1990. The radiation dosimetry of 99mTc-
exametazime. Nucl. Med. Comm. 11, 791–799.
Vestergren, E., Jacobsson, L., Mattsson, S., et al., 1992. Biokinetics and dosimetry of Tc-99 m
HM-PAO in children. In: S-Stelson, A., Watson, E.E. (Eds.), Fifth International
174
Radiopharmaceutical Dosimetry Symposium, Oak Ridge, TN, USA, May 7–10, 1992.
CONF-910529. Oak Ridge Associated Universities, Oak Ridge, TN, USA, pp. 444–456.
Villanueva-Meyer, J., Thompson, D., Mena, I., et al., 1990. Lachrymal gland dosimetry for
the brain imaging agent technetium-99m-HMPAO. J. Nucl. Med. 31, 1237–1239.
175
99m
Table C.70. Biokinetic data for Tc-labelled hexamethylpropyleneamineoxine.
176
99m
Table C.71. Absorbed doses for Tc-labelled hexamethylpropyleneamineoxine.
Effective dose (mSv MBq1) 9.3E03 1.1E02 1.7E02 2.7E02 4.9E02 1.2E01
99m
The physical half-life of Tc is 6.01 h.
177
99m
C36.2. Reference for Tc-labelled iminodiacetic acid derivatives
ICRP, 1987. Radiation dose to patients from radiopharmaceuticals. ICRP Publication 53.
Ann. ICRP 18(1–4).
178
99m
Table C.72. Biokinetic data for Tc-labelled iminodiacetic acid derivatives.
179
180
99m
Table C.73. Absorbed doses for Tc-labelled iminodiacetic acid derivatives.
181
182
183
184
99m
C.37.2. Reference for Tc-labelled macro-aggregated albumin
ICRP, 1987. Radiation dose to patients from radiopharmaceuticals. ICRP Publication 53.
Ann. ICRP 18(1–4).
99m
Table C.74. Biokinetic data for Tc-labelled macro-aggregated albumin.
185
99m
Table C.75. Absorbed doses for Tc-labelled macro-aggregated albumin.
186
99m
C.38.2. References for Tc-labelled mercaptoacetyl triglycine
Bubeck, B., Brandau, W., Weber, E., et al., 1990. Pharmacokinetics of technetium-99m-
MAG3 in humans. J. Nucl. Med. 31, 1285–1293.
Jafri, R.A., Britton, K.E., Nimmon, C.C., et al., 1988. Technetium-99m-MAG3, a comparison
with iodine-123 and iodine-131 orthoiodohippurate, in patients with renal disorders.
J. Nucl. Med. 29, 147–158.
Stabin, M.G., Taylor, A. Jr, Eshima, D., et al., 1992. Radiation dosimetry for Tc-99m MAG3,
technetium-99m-DTPA, and iodine-131 OIH based on human distribution studies. J. Nucl.
Med. 33, 33–40.
Taylor, A. Jr, Eshima, D., Fritzberg, A.R., et al., 1986. Comparison of iodine-131 OIH and
technetium-99m MAG3 renal imaging in volunteers. J. Nucl. Med. 27, 795–803.
187
99m
Table C.76. Biokinetic data for Tc-labelled mercaptoacetyl triglycine.
188
99m
Table C.77. Absorbed doses for Tc-labelled mercaptoacetyl triglycine.
189
190
191
99m
C.39.2. References for Tc-labelled non-absorbable markers
99m
Chadhuri, T.K., 1974. Use of Tc-DTPA for measuring gastric emptying time. J. Nucl.
Med. 15, 391–395.
Fisher, R.S., Malmud, L.S., Roberts, G.S., Lobis, I.F., 1976. Gastroesophageal (GE) scinti-
scanning to detect and quantitate GE reflux. Gastroenterology 70, 301–308.
ICRP, 1987. Radiation dose to patients from radiopharmaceuticals. ICRP Publication 53.
Ann. ICRP 18(1–4).
Meyer, J.H., MacGregor, I.L., Gueller, R., Martin, P., Cavalieri, R., 1976. 99mTc-tagged
chicken liver as a marker of solid food in the human stomach. Am. J. Dig. Dis. 21, 296–304.
99m
Table C.78. Biokinetic data for Tc-labelled non-absorbable markers.
192
99m
Table C.79. Absorbed doses for Tc-labelled non-absorbable markers.
193
194
99m
C.40.2. References for Tc-labelled methoxy-isobutyl-isonitrile
Andersson, L., Jönsson, B-A., Leide, S., et al., 1990. Biodistribution and retention of Tc-99m-
HEXA-MIBI evaluated in the rat, Eur. J. Nucl. Med. 16(Suppl.), S105.
ICRP, 1979. Limits for intakes of radionuclides by workers. Part 1. ICRP Publication 30.
Ann. ICRP 2(3/4).
ICRP, 1987. Radiation dose to patients from radiopharmaceuticals. ICRP Publication 53.
Ann. ICRP 18(1–4).
Leide, S., Diemer, H., Ahlgren, L., et al., 1992. In vivo distribution and dosimetry of Tc-99m
MIBI in man. In: S-Stelson, A., Watson, E.E. (Eds.), Fifth International
Radiopharmaceutical Dosimetry Symposium, Oak Ridge, TN, USA, May 7–10, 1992.
CONF-910529. Oak Ridge Associated Universities, Oak Ridge, TN, USA, pp. 483–497.
Wackers, F.J.T., Berman, D.S., Maddahi, J., et al., 1989. Technetium-99m hexakis-2 methoxy
isobutyl isonitrile; human biodistribution, dosimetry, safety, preliminary comparison to Tl-
201 for myocardial perfusion imaging. J. Nucl. Med. 30, 301–311.
195
99m
Table C.80. Biokinetic data for Tc-labelled methoxy-isobutyl-isonitrile.
Resting subject
Heart wall 0.015 4.0 0.67 0.070
24 0.33
Liver 0.68
Immediate uptake 0.18 1.3 0.85
24 0.15
Delayed uptake 0.51
Gallbladder 0.23 0.25
Gastrointestinal tract contents
Small intestine 0.69 0.50
Upper large intestine 0.69 0.65
Lower large intestine 0.69 0.32
Kidneys 0.14 7.0 1.00 0.66
Muscles 0.20 24 1.00 1.4
Salivary glands 0.015 24 1.00 0.10
Thyroid 0.003 2.0 1.00 0.0064
Other organs and tissues 0.45 24 1.00 3.1
Urinary bladder contents 0.31
Adult, 15 years 0.17
10 years 0.15
5 years, 1 year 0.099
Exercise
Heart wall 0.02 4.0 0.67 0.093
24 0.33
Liver 0.53
Immediate uptake 0.10 1.3 0.85
Delayed uptake 0.60 24 0.15
Gallbladder 0.23 0.20
Gastrointestinal tract contents
Small intestine 0.70 0.39
Upper large intestine 0.70 0.50
Lower large intestine 0.70 0.25
Kidneys 0.10 7.0 1.00 0.47
Muscles 0.40 24 1.00 2.8
Salivary glands 0.01 24 1.00 0.070
Thyroid 0.002 2.0 1.00 0.0044
Other organs and tissues 0.37 24 1.00 2.6
(continued on next page)
196
197
99m
Table C.81. Absorbed doses for Tc-labelled methoxy-isobutyl-isonitrile.
Resting subject
Adrenals 7.5E03 9.9E03 1.5E02 2.2E02 3.8E02
Bone surfaces 8.2E03 1.0E02 1.6E02 2.1E02 3.8E02
Brain 5.2E03 7.1E03 1.1E02 1.6E02 2.7E02
Breast 3.8E03 5.3E03 7.1E03 1.1E02 2.0E02
Gallbladder wall 3.9E02 4.5E02 5.8E02 1.0E01 3.2E01
Gastrointestinal tract
Stomach wall 6.5E03 9.0E03 1.5E02 2.1E02 3.5E02
Small intestine wall 1.5E02 1.8E02 2.9E02 4.5E02 8.0E02
Colon wall 2.4E02 3.1E02 5.0E02 7.9E02 1.5E02
(Upper large intestine wall 2.7E02 3.5E02 5.7E02 8.9E02 1.7E01)
(Lower large intestine wall 1.9E02 2.5E02 4.1E02 6.5E02 1.2E01)
Heart wall 6.3E03 8.2E03 1.2E02 1.8E02 3.0E02
Kidneys 3.6E02 4.3E02 5.9E02 8.5E02 1.5E01
Liver 1.1E02 1.4E02 2.1E02 3.0E02 5.2E02
Lungs 4.6E03 6.4E03 9.7E03 1.4E02 2.5E02
Muscles 2.9E03 3.7E03 5.4E03 7.6E03 1.4E02
Oesophagus 4.1E03 5.7E03 8.6E03 1.3E02 2.3E02
Ovaries 9.1E03 1.2E02 1.8E02 2.5E02 4.5E02
Pancreas 7.7E03 1.0E02 1.6E02 2.4E02 3.9E02
Red marrow 5.5E03 7.1E03 1.1E02 3.0E02 4.4E02
Salivary glands 1.4E02 1.7E02 2.2E02 1.5E02 2.6E02
Skin 3.1E03 4.1E03 6.4E03 9.8E03 1.9E02
Spleen 6.5E03 8.6E03 1.4E02 2.0E02 3.4E02
Testes 3.8E03 5.0E03 7.5E03 1.1E02 2.1E02
Thymus 4.1E03 5.7E03 8.6E03 1.3E02 2.3E02
Thyroid 5.3E03 7.9E03 1.2E02 2.4E02 4.5E02
Urinary bladder wall 1.1E02 1.4E02 1.9E02 2.3E02 4.1E02
Uterus 7.8E03 1.0E02 1.5E02 2.2E02 3.8E02
Remaining organs 3.1E03 3.9E03 6.0E03 8.8E03 1.6E02
198
Exercise
Adrenals 6.6E03 8.7E03 1.3E02 1.9E02 3.3E02
Bone surfaces 7.8E03 9.7E03 1.4E02 2.0E02 3.6E02
Brain 4.4E03 6.0E03 9.3E03 1.4E02 2.3E02
Breast 3.4E03 4.7E03 6.2E03 9.7E03 1.8E02
Gallbladder wall 3.3E02 3.8E02 4.9E02 8.6E02 2.6E01
Gastrointestinal tract
Stomach wall 5.9E03 8.1E03 1.3E02 1.9E02 3.2E02
Small intestine wall 1.2E02 1.5E02 2.4E02 3.7E02 6.6E02
Colon wall 1.9E02 2.5E02 4.1E02 6.4E02 1.2E01
(Upper large intestine wall 2.2E02 2.8E02 4.6E02 7.2E02 1.3E01)
(Lower large intestine wall 1.6E02 2.1E02 3.4E02 5.3E02 9.9E02)
Heart wall 7.2E03 9.4E03 1.0E02 2.1E02 3.5E02
Kidneys 2.6E02 3.2E02 4.4E02 6.3E02 1.1E01
Liver 9.2E03 1.2E02 1.8E02 2.5E02 4.4E02
Lungs 4.4E03 6.0E03 8.7E03 1.3E02 2.3E02
Muscles 3.2E03 4.1E03 6.0E03 9.0E03 1.7E02
Oesophagus 4.0E03 5.5E03 8.0E03 1.2E02 2.3E02
Ovaries 8.1E03 1.1E02 1.5E02 2.3E02 4.0E02
Pancreas 6.9E03 9.1E03 1.4E02 2.1E02 3.5E02
Red marrow 5.0E03 6.4E03 9.5E03 1.3E02 2.3E02
Salivary glands 9.2E03 1.1E02 1.5E03 2.0E03 2.9E03
Skin 2.9E03 3.7E03 5.8E03 9.0E03 1.7E02
Spleen 5.8E03 7.6E03 1.2E02 1.7E02 3.0E02
Testes 3.7E03 4.8E03 7.1E03 1.1E02 2.0E02
Thymus 4.0E03 5.5E03 8.0E03 1.2E02 2.3E02
Thyroid 4.4E03 6.4E03 9.9E03 1.9E02 3.5E02
Urinary bladder wall 9.8E03 1.3E02 1.7E02 2.1E02 3.8E02
Uterus 7.2E03 9.3E03 1.4E02 2.0E02 3.5E02
Remaining organs 3.3E03 4.3E03 6.4E03 9.8E03 1.8E02
199
Tp Teff
ðC:1Þ
Teff
where Tp is the physical half-life, and Teff is the effective half-time of the antibody.
200
99m
C.41.2. References for Tc-labelled monoclonal tumour-associated antibodies
Bischof Delaloye, A., Delaloye, B., 1995. Radiolabelled monoclonal antibodies in tumour
imaging and therapy: out of fashion? Eur. J. Nucl. Med. 22, 571–580.
Britton, K.E., Granowska, M., 1987. Radioimmunoscintigraphy in tumour identification.
Cancer Surv. 6, 247–267.
Fishman, A.J., Khaw, B.A., Strauss, H.N., 1989. Quo vadis radioimmune imaging. J. Nucl.
Med. 20, 1911–1915.
ICRP, 1987. Radiation dose to patients from radiopharmaceuticals. ICRP Publication 53.
Ann. ICRP 18(1–4).
201
99m
Table C.82. Biokinetic data for Tc-labelled monoclonal tumour-associated antibodies.
Intact antibody
Kidneys 0.03 24 0.5 0.23
96 0.5
Liver 0.50 24 0.5 3.8
96 0.5
Spleen 0.09 24 0.5 0.68
96 0.5
Red marrow 0.20 24 0.5 1.5
96 0.5
Other organs and tissues 0.18 24 0.5 1.4
96 0.5
*
Released technetium 1.0 24 0.5
96 0.5
F(ab’)2 fragments
Kidneys 0.20 12 1.0 1.2
Liver 0.30 12 1.0 1.7
Spleen 0.06 12 1.0 0.35
Red marrow 0.10 12 1.0 0.58
Other organs and tissues 0.34 12 1.0 2.0
y
Released technetium 1.0 12 1.0
F(ab’) fragments
Kidneys 0.40 6.0 1.0 1.7
Liver 0.10 6.0 1.0 0.43
Spleen 0.02 6.0 1.0 0.09
Red marrow 0.03 6.0 1.0 0.13
Other organs and tissues 0.45 6.0 1.0 2.0
z
Released technetium 1.0 6.0 1.0
*To obtain the contribution from released technetium, the cumulated activities given in the pertechnetate
model should be multiplied by 0.13.
y
To obtain the contribution from released technetium, the cumulated activities given in the pertechnetate
model should be multiplied by 0.33.
z
To obtain the contribution from released technetium, the cumulated activities given in the pertechnetate
model should be multiplied by 0.50.
202
99m
Table C.83. Absorbed doses for Tc-labelled monoclonal tumour-associated antibodies.
Intact antibody
Adrenals 1.0E02 1.2E02 1.8E02 2.4E02 3.7E02
Bone surfaces 1.2E02 1.6E02 2.6E02 4.4E02 1.0E01
Brain 1.4E03 1.7E03 2.6E03 4.2E03 7.9E03
Breast 2.1E03 2.6E03 4.3E03 6.6E03 1.2E02
Gallbladder wall 1.5E02 1.7E02 2.4E02 3.7E02 6.1E02
Gastrointestinal tract
Stomach wall 8.4E03 1.1E02 1.6E02 2.6E02 4.6E02
Small intestine wall 5.6E03 7.0E03 1.1E02 1.7E02 2.9E02
Colon wall 8.9E03 1.1E02 1.9E02 3.0E02 5.4E02
(Upper large intestine wall 1.2E02 1.5E02 2.5E02 4.1E02 7.3E02)
(Lower large intestine wall 4.9E03 6.4E03 1.0E02 1.6E02 2.8E02)
Heart wall 5.5E03 6.9E03 1.0E02 1.4E02 2.5E02
Kidneys 1.9E02 2.2E02 3.2E02 4.5E02 7.4E02
Liver 4.5E02 5.8E02 8.5E02 1.2E01 2.1E01
Lungs 4.9E03 6.3E03 8.7E03 1.3E02 2.2E02
Muscles 2.9E03 3.7E03 5.4E03 7.9E03 1.4E02
Oesophagus 2.5E03 3.0E03 4.3E03 6.5E03 1.1E02
Ovaries 4.0E03 5.1E03 7.6E03 1.1E02 1.9E02
Pancreas 1.1E02 1.4E02 2.0E02 3.0E02 4.8E02
Red marrow 1.7E02 1.9E02 3.0E02 5.2E02 1.1E01
Salivary glands 4.2E03 5.4E03 7.6E03 1.1E02 1.7E02
Skin 1.6E03 1.9E03 3.0E03 4.7E03 8.9E03
Spleen 6.0E02 8.4E02 1.3E01 1.9E01 3.4E01
Testes 1.3E03 1.6E03 2.6E03 4.2E03 7.7E03
Thymus 2.5E03 3.0E03 4.3E03 6.5E03 1.1E02
Thyroid 4.0E03 6.0E03 9.2E03 1.9E02 3.5E02
Urinary bladder wall 3.7E03 4.9E03 6.9E03 9.6E03 1.6E02
Uterus 3.3E03 4.2E03 6.6E03 1.0E02 1.7E02
Remaining organs 3.1E03 4.0E03 5.8E03 8.7E03 1.4E02
203
F(ab’)2 fragments
Adrenals 9.1E03 1.1E02 1.7E02 2.4E02 4.0E02
Bone surfaces 8.3E03 1.0E02 1.6E02 2.6E02 5.6E02
Brain 1.8E03 2.3E03 3.6E03 5.8E03 1.0E02
Breast 2.0E03 2.6E03 4.0E03 6.4E03 1.2E02
Gallbladder wall 1.1E02 1.3E02 1.9E02 2.9E02 4.6E02
Gastrointestinal tract
Stomach wall 1.3E02 1.6E02 2.3E02 3.7E02 7.0E02
Small intestine wall 8.1E03 1.0E02 1.6E02 2.4E02 4.2E02
Colon wall 1.6E02 2.2E02 3.6E02 5.7E02 1.0E01
(Upper large intestine wall 2.2E02 2.9E02 4.8E02 7.7E02 1.4E01)
(Lower large intestine wall 9.0E03 1.2E02 1.9E02 3.0E02 5.5E02)
Heart wall 4.4E03 5.6E03 8.3E03 1.2E02 2.1E02
Kidneys 6.2E02 7.4E02 1.0E01 1.5E01 2.5E01
Liver 2.3E02 2.9E02 4.3E02 6.1E02 1.1E01
Lungs 3.9E03 5.1E03 7.3E03 1.1E02 1.9E02
Muscles 3.3E03 4.1E03 6.0E03 8.9E03 1.6E02
Oesophagus 2.6E03 3.3E03 4.8E03 7.5E03 1.3E02
Ovaries 5.6E03 7.1E03 1.1E02 1.6E02 2.7E02
Pancreas 9.4E03 1.2E02 1.7E02 2.5E02 4.1E02
Red marrow 8.7E03 9.7E03 1.5E02 2.5E02 4.8E02
Salivary glands 6.4E03 7.2E03 1.1E02 1.6E02 2.6E02
Skin 1.8E03 2.2E03 3.5E03 5.5E03 1.0E02
Spleen 3.4E02 4.7E02 7.1E02 1.1E01 1.9E01
Testes 2.0E03 2.6E03 4.0E03 6.3E03 1.2E02
Thymus 2.6E03 3.3E03 4.8E03 7.5E03 1.3E02
Thyroid 8.5E03 1.3E02 2.0E02 4.3E02 8.0E02
Urinary bladder wall 7.3E03 9.6E03 1.3E02 1.6E02 2.8E02
Uterus 4.8E03 6.0E03 9.3E03 1.4E02 2.4E02
Remaining organs 3.6E03 4.5E03 6.8E03 1.0E02 1.8E02
204
F(ab’) fragments
Adrenals 8.4E03 1.1E02 1.6E02 2.4E02 4.2E02
Bone surfaces 6.3E03 7.5E03 1.1E02 1.7E02 3.2E02
Brain 2.0E03 2.5E03 4.1E03 6.5E03 1.2E02
Breast 1.9E03 2.5E03 3.8E03 6.0E03 1.1E02
Gallbladder wall 8.7E03 1.1E02 1.7E02 2.4E02 3.6E02
Gastrointestinal tract
Stomach wall 1.6E02 2.1E02 2.9E02 4.6E02 9.0E02
Small intestine wall 1.0E02 1.3E02 2.0E02 3.0E02 5.2E02
Colon wall 2.3E02 3.0E02 4.9E02 8.0E02 1.5E01
(Upper large intestine wall 3.1E02 4.0E02 6.6E02 1.1E01 2.0E01)
(Lower large intestine wall 1.2E02 1.6E02 2.6E02 4.1E02 7.6E02)
Heart wall 3.7E03 4.7E03 7.1E03 1.1E02 1.8E02
Kidneys 8.9E02 1.1E01 1.5E01 2.1E01 3.7E01
Liver 8.7E03 1.1E02 1.7E02 2.4E02 4.0E02
Lungs 3.1E03 4.2E03 6.2E03 9.5E03 1.7E02
Muscles 3.4E03 4.2E03 6.2E03 9.4E03 1.7E02
Oesophagus 2.6E03 3.3E03 4.9E03 7.8E03 1.4E02
Ovaries 6.8E03 8.6E03 1.3E02 1.9E02 3.3E02
Pancreas 8.1E03 1.0E02 1.5E02 2.2E02 3.5E02
Red marrow 4.7E03 5.5E03 8.1E03 1.2E02 2.0E02
Salivary glands 7.9E03 9.8E03 1.4E02 1.9E02 3.1E02
Skin 1.9E03 2.3E03 3.7E03 5.9E03 1.1E02
Spleen 1.4E02 1.8E02 2.8E02 4.1E02 7.0E02
Testes 2.5E03 3.2E03 4.9E03 7.5E03 1.4E02
Thymus 2.6E03 3.3E03 4.9E03 7.8E03 1.4E02
Thyroid 1.2E02 1.9E02 2.9E02 6.2E02 1.2E01
Urinary bladder wall 1.0E02 1.3E02 1.7E02 2.0E02 3.7E02
Uterus 5.8E03 7.3E03 1.1E02 1.7E02 2.8E02
Remaining organs 3.7E03 4.6E03 6.9E03 1.0E02 1.8E02
205
99m
C.42.2. References for Tc-Pertechnegas
Isawa, T., Lee, B.T., Hiraga, K., 1996. High-resolution electron microscopy of Technegas and
Pertechnegas. Nucl. Med. Commun. 17, 147–152.
Kotzerke, J., van den Hoff, J., Burchert, W., et al., 1996. A compartmental model for alveolar
clearance of Pertechnegas. J. Nucl. Med. 37, 2066–2071.
Lloyd, J.J., Shields, R.A., Taylor, C.J., et al., 1995. Technegas and Pertechnegas particle size
distribution. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. 22, 473–476.
206
99m
Table C.84. Biokinetic data for Tc-Pertechnegas.
207
99m
Table C.85. Absorbed doses for Tc-Pertechnegas.
Inhalation
Adrenals 3.7E03 4.7E03 7.2E03 1.1E02 1.9E02
Bone surfaces 5.2E03 6.3E03 9.3E03 1.4E02 2.5E02
Brain 1.9E03 2.4E03 3.9E03 6.2E03 1.1E02
Breast 2.0E03 2.6E03 3.9E03 6.2E03 1.1E02
Gallbladder wall 6.5E03 8.7E03 1.4E02 2.0E02 3.1E02
Gastrointestinal tract
Stomach wall 2.1E02 2.8E02 3.9E02 6.4E02 1.3E01
Small intestine wall 1.3E02 1.6E02 2.6E02 3.9E02 6.8E02
Colon wall 3.4E02 4.4E02 7.3E02 1.2E01 2.2E01
(Upper large intestine wall 4.6E02 6.0E02 1.0E01 1.6E01 3.1E01)
(Lower large intestine wall 1.8E02 2.3E02 3.8E02 5.9E02 1.1E01)
Heart wall 3.5E03 4.6E03 6.8E03 1.0E02 1.8E02
Kidneys 3.9E03 4.8E03 7.3E03 1.1E02 1.9E02
Liver 3.7E03 4.8E03 7.8E03 1.2E02 2.1E02
Lungs 8.1E03 1.2E02 1.6E02 2.5E02 4.7E02
Muscles 3.1E03 3.9E03 5.7E03 8.6E03 1.6E02
Oesophagus 2.7E03 3.5E03 5.2E03 8.0E03 1.4E02
Ovaries 8.6E03 1.1E02 1.6E02 2.3E02 3.9E02
Pancreas 5.2E03 6.7E03 1.0E02 1.5E02 2.5E02
Red marrow 3.4E03 4.2E03 6.2E03 8.5E03 1.4E02
Salivary glands 9.3E03 1.2E02 1.6E02 2.2E02 3.5E02
Skin 1.7E03 2.1E03 3.4E03 5.3E03 1.0E02
Spleen 4.1E03 5.1E03 7.7E03 1.1E02 2.0E02
Testes 2.7E03 3.6E03 5.5E03 8.2E03 1.5E02
Thymus 2.7E03 3.5E03 5.2E03 8.0E03 1.4E02
Thyroid 1.9E02 3.0E02 4.5E02 9.7E02 1.8E01
Urinary bladder wall 1.9E02 2.5E02 3.2E02 3.5E02 6.2E02
Uterus 7.4E03 9.3E03 1.4E02 2.0E02 3.3E02
Remaining organs 3.3E03 4.1E03 6.0E03 9.0E03 1.6E02
208
(C132) The MIRD Dose Estimate Report No. 8 (MIRD, 1976) presents two sets
of biological parameters based on a compartmental model and constructed using
data from measurements on different groups of subjects. The two groups are possibly
related to different levels of physical activity (resting and non-resting). For most
organs and tissues, the difference in absorbed dose per unit administered activity
between the two groups is small (less than a factor of two).
(C133) The following model is based on mean values for the parameters in the two
MIRD groups. Data published by Dayton et al. (1969) on renal clearance, by Beasley
et al. (1966) on distribution in humans, and by Andros et al. (1965) have also been
used. All published studies have demonstrated early active uptake in the thyroid,
salivary glands, and stomach, and delayed uptake in the colon. The remaining frac-
tion of administered activity is assumed to be distributed uniformly throughout all
other organs and tissues (except brain). Elimination is by way of the kidneys and
intestines.
(C134) Pre-treatment with blocking agents such as perchlorate or iodide inhibits
active uptake and diminishes whole-body retention (Coffey et al., 1984). The model
for this case therefore assumes uniform distribution and a higher rate of renal excre-
tion than in the standard model set out above.
(C135) For oral administration, the fractional absorption is taken to be 0.8 (ICRP,
1980).
99m
C.43.2. References for Tc-pertechnetate
Andros, G., Harper, P.V., Lathrop, K.A., McCardle, R.J., 1965. Pertechnetate-99m localisa-
tion in man with application to thyroid scanning and the study of thyroid physiology.
J. Clin. Endocrinol. 25, 1067–1076.
Beasley, T.M., Palmer, H.E., Nelp, W.B., 1966. Distribution and excretion of technetium in
humans. Health Phys. 12, 1425–1435.
Coffey, J.L., Hayes, R.L., Rafter, J.J., Watson, E.E., Carlton, J.E., 1984. Radiation dosimetry
and chemical toxicity considerations for 99Tc. Health Phys. 46, 418–422.
Dayton, D.A., Maher, F.T., Elveback, L.R., 1969. Renal clearance of technetium (99mTc) as
pertechnetate. Mayo Clin. Proc. 44, 549–551.
ICRP, 1980. Limits for Intakes of Radionuclides by Workers. ICRP Publication 30, Part 2.
Pergamon, Oxford.
MIRD, 1976. Summary of current radiation dose estimates to normal humans from 99mTc as
sodium pertechnetate. Dose Estimate Report No. 8. J. Nucl. Med. 17, 74–77.
209
99m
Table C.86. Biokinetic data for Tc-pertechnetate.
Organ (S) Fs T (h) a Ãs/A0 (h)
210
99m
Table C.87. Absorbed doses for Tc-pertechnetate.
211
212
213
99m
C.44.2. References for Tc-labelled phosphates and phosphonates
Ackerhalt, R.E., Blau, M., Bakshi, S., Sondel, J.A., 1974. A comparative study of three
99mTc-labeled phosphorus compounds and 18F-fluoride for skeletal imaging. J. Nucl.
Med. 15, 1153–1157.
Fogelman, F., Bessent, R.G., Turner, J.G., Citrin, D.L., Boyle, I.T., Greig, W.R., 1978. The
use of whole body retention of Tc99m diphosphonate in the diagnosis of metabolic bone
disease. J. Nucl. Med. 19, 270–275.
Krishnamurthy, G.T., Huebotter, R.J., Walsh, C.F., et al., 1975. Kinetics of 99mTc-labeled
pyrophosphate and polyphosphate in man. J. Nucl. Med. 16, 109–115.
Makler, P.T., Charkes, N.D., 1980. Studies of skeletal tracer kinetics IV. Optimum time delay
for Tc-99m (Sn) methylene diphosphonate bone imaging. J. Nucl. Med. 21, 641–645.
Rudd, T.G., Allen, D.R., Hartnett, D.E., 1977. Tc99m methylene diphosphonate versus
Tc99m pyrophosphate: biologic and clinical comparison. J. Nucl. Med. 18, 872–876.
Subramanian, G., McAfee, J.G., Blair, R.J., Kallfelz, F., Thomas, F.D., 1975. Technetium
99m methylene diphosphate-A superior agent for skeletal imaging. Comparison with other
technetium complexes. J. Nucl. Med. 16, 744–755.
214
99m
Table C.88. Biokinetic data for Tc-labelled phosphates and phosphonates.
215
99m
Table C.89. Absorbed doses for Tc-labelled phosphates and phosphonates.
216
217
(C139) Erythrocytes can be labelled with 99mTc in vitro, in vivo, or with a com-
bined in-vitro/in-vivo method (Callahan et al., 1982). Several studies have demon-
strated some elution of technetium from the circulating cells, with half-times of 40
and 80 h after in-vitro or in-vivo labelling, respectively. The exact mechanism of
elution and the fate of the eluted technetium is not known, but approximately
15% of the activity is excreted in the urine during the first day (Porter et al.,
1983). The reader is referred to Dahlström et al. (1979), Larson et al. (1978), and
Ryo and Pinsky (1976) for further information.
(C140) In the model chosen, the activity is assumed to be distributed in the blood,
being removed with a half-time of 60 h by excretion via the kidneys. No specific
uptake in any organ or tissue is assumed. The model assumes 100% efficiency in
labelling of the erythrocytes. In the case of incomplete labelling, the separate con-
tribution from free pertechnetate has to be taken into account.
99m
C.45.2. References for Tc-labelled erythrocytes
Callahan, R.J., Froelich, J.W., McKusick, K.A., Leppo, J., Strauss, W.H., 1982. A modified
method for the in vivo labeling of red blood cells with Tc-99m: concise communication.
J. Nucl. Med. 23, 315–318.
Dahlström, J.A., Carlsson, S., Lilja, B., Mattsson, S., Pettersson, C., 1979. Cardiac blood pool
imaging–a clinical comparison between red blood cells labeled with 99mTc in vivo and
in vitro and 99mTc-labeled human serum albumin. Nuklearmedizin 18, 271–273.
Larson, S.M., Hamilton, G.W., Richards, P., Ritchie, J.L., 1978. Kit-labeled technetium-99m
red blood cells (Tc-99m-RBC’s) for clinical cardiac chamber imaging. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. 3,
227–231.
Porter, W.C., Dees, S.M., Freitas, J.E., Dworkin, H.J., 1983. Acid-citrate-dextrose compared
with heparin in the preparation of in vivo/in vitro technetium-99m red blood cells. J. Nucl.
Med. 24, 383–387.
Ryo, U.Y., Pinsky, S.M., 1976. Radionuclide angiography with 99m technetium-RBC’s. Crit.
Rev. Clin. Radiol. Nucl. Med. 8, 107–128.
99m
Table C.90. Biokinetic data for Tc-labelled erythrocytes.
218
99m
Table C.91. Absorbed doses for Tc-labelled erythrocytes.
219
99m
C.46.2. References for Tc-Technegas
Burch, W.M., Sullivan, P.J., McLaren, C.J., 1986. Technegas – a new ventilation agent for
lung scanning. Nucl. Med. Commun. 7, 865–871.
ICRP, 1987. Radiation dose to patients from radiopharmaceuticals. ICRP Publication 53.
Ann. ICRP 18(1–4).
Isawa, T., Teshima, T., Anazawa, Y., et al., 1991. Technegas for inhalation lung imaging.
Nucl. Med. Commun. 12, 47–55.
Isawa, T., Lee, B.T., Hiraga, K., 1996. High-resolution electron microscopy of Technegas and
Pertechnegas. Nucl. Med. Commun. 17, 147–152.
Lloyd, J.J., Shields, R.A., Taylor, C.J., et al., 1995. Technegas and Pertechnegas particle size
distribution. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. 22, 473–476.
Strong, J.C., Agnew, J.E., 1989. The particle size distribution of Technegas and its influence
on regional lung deposition. Nucl. Med. Comm. 10, 425–430.
220
99m
Table C.92. Biokinetic data for Tc-Technegas.
221
99m
Table C.93. Absorbed doses for Tc-Technegas.
Inhalation
Adrenals 6.8E03 9.1E03 1.3E02 2.0E02 3.4E02
Bone surfaces 4.9E03 6.3E03 8.8E03 1.4E02 2.6E02
Brain 2.5E04 3.3E04 5.8E04 9.4E04 1.5E03
Breast 6.7E03 7.3E03 1.3E02 1.9E02 2.7E02
Gallbladder wall 2.3E03 3.2E03 5.5E03 8.4E03 1.1E02
Gastrointestinal tract
Stomach wall 4.4E03 6.2E03 8.8E03 1.3E02 2.2E02
Small intestine wall 8.7E04 1.3E03 2.2E03 3.9E03 7.8E03
Colon wall 1.4E03 1.9E03 3.4E03 5.9E03 1.2E02
(Upper large intestine wall 1.9E03 2.5E03 4.6E03 7.7E03 1.5E02)
(Lower large intestine wall 7.4E04 1.0E03 1.8E03 3.4E03 7.0E03)
Heart wall 1.3E02 1.7E02 2.3E02 3.2E02 4.8E02
Kidneys 2.0E03 3.0E03 4.6E03 7.2E03 1.3E02
Liver 5.7E03 7.8E03 1.0E02 1.5E02 2.5E02
Lungs 1.1E01 1.6E01 2.2E01 3.3E01 6.3E01
Muscles 2.8E03 3.6E03 4.9E03 7.3E03 1.3E02
Oesophagus 8.2E03 1.0E02 1.5E02 1.9E02 2.7E02
Ovaries 4.1E04 5.5E04 1.1E03 2.0E03 4.2E03
Pancreas 5.2E03 7.3E03 1.0E02 1.6E02 2.8E02
Red marrow 3.3E03 3.8E03 5.0E03 6.6E03 1.1E02
Salivary glands 2.8E03 3.6E03 6.3E03 9.8E03 1.8E02
Skin 1.2E03 1.3E03 2.2E03 3.3E03 5.9E03
Spleen 4.8E03 6.3E03 9.3E03 1.5E02 2.5E02
Testes 6.1E05 9.1E05 2.0E04 3.3E04 1.1E03
Thymus 8.2E03 1.0E02 1.5E02 1.9E02 2.7E02
Thyroid 2.9E03 3.9E03 6.9E03 1.1E02 2.0E02
Urinary bladder wall 3.2E04 4.5E04 7.4E04 1.2E03 2.8E03
Uterus 3.0E04 4.6E04 8.3E04 1.6E03 3.6E03
Remaining organs 2.7E03 3.5E03 4.7E03 6.8E03 1.2E02
222
99m
C.47.2. References for Tc-labelled tetrofosmin
Higley, B., Smith, F.W., Smith, T., et al., 1993. Technetium-99m-1,2-bis(bis(2-ethoxyethyl)
phosphino)ethane: human biodistribution, dosimetry and safety of a new myocardial per-
fusion imaging agent. J. Nucl. Med. 34, 30–38.
ICRP, 1979. Limits for intakes of radionuclides by workers. ICRP Publication 30, Part 1.
Ann. ICRP 2(3/4).
ICRP, 1987. Radiation dose to patients from radiopharmaceuticals. ICRP Publication 53.
Ann. ICRP 18(1–4).
ICRP, 1991. Radiation dose to patients from radiopharmaceuticals. Addendum 1 to
Publication 53. ICRP Publication 62. Ann. ICRP 22(3).
Smith, T., Lahiri, A., Gemmell, H.G., et al., 1992. Dosimetry of 99mTc-P53, a new myocardial
perfusion imaging agent. In: S-Stelson, A., Watson, E.E. (Eds.), Fifth International
Radiopharmaceutical Dosimetry Symposium, Oak Ridge, TN, USA, May 7–10, 1992.
CONF-910529. Oak Ridge Associated Universities, Oak Ridge, TN, USA, pp. 467–481.
223
99m
Table C.94. Biokinetic data for Tc-labelled tetrofosmin.
Organ (S) Fs T (h) a Ãs/A0 (h)
Resting subject
Thyroid 0.003 2.0 1.00 0.0064
Salivary glands 0.15 24 1.00 0.10
Heart wall 0.012 4.0 0.67 0.055
24 0.33
Kidneys 0.07 1.0 0.70 0.21
24 0.30
Liver 0.10 0.50 0.85 0.088
2.0 0.15
Other organs and tissues 0.80 0.33 0.15 4.8
24 0.85
Gallbladder contents 0.18 0.24
Gastrointestinal contents
Small intestine 0.54 0.51
Upper large intestine 0.54 0.67
Lower large intestine 0.54 0.33
Urinary bladder contents 0.46
Adult, 15 years 0.33
10 years 0.28
5 years, 1 year 0.18
Exercise
Thyroid 0.002 2.0 1.00 0.0044
Salivary glands 0.01 24 1.00 0.070
Heart wall 0.013 4.0 0.67 0.060
24 0.33
Kidneys 0.05 1.0 0.70 0.15
24 0.30
Liver 0.05 0.50 0.85 0.045
2.0 0.15
Other organs and tissues 0.875 0.33 0.05 5.8
24 0.95
Gallbladder contents 0.153 0.18
Gastrointestinal contents
Small intestine 0.46 0.36
Upper large intestine 0.46 0.46
Lower large intestine 0.46 0.23
Urinary bladder contents 0.54
Adult, 15 years 0.25
10 years 0.22
5 years, 1 year 0.14
224
99m
Table C.95. Absorbed doses for Tc-labelled tetrofosmin.
Resting subject
Adrenals 4.2E03 5.3E03 8.1E03 1.2E02 2.2E02
Bone surfaces 5.8E03 6.9E03 1.0E02 1.5E02 2.7E02
Brain 2.3E03 2.9E03 4.6E03 7.4E03 1.3E02
Breast 2.0E03 2.5E03 3.7E03 6.1E03 1.2E02
Gallbladder wall 3.6E02 4.1E02 5.3E02 9.3E02 3.0E01
Gastrointestinal tract contents
Stomach wall 4.5E03 6.0E03 9.7E03 1.4E02 2.4E02
Small intestine wall 1.5E02 1.8E02 2.9E02 4.6E02 8.1E02
Colon wall 2.4E02 3.1E02 5.0E02 7.9E02 1.5E01
(Upper large intestine wall 2.7E02 3.5E02 5.6E02 8.9E02 1.6E01)
(Lower large intestine wall 2.0E02 2.6E02 4.2E02 6.6E02 1.2E01)
Heart wall 4.7E03 5.9E03 8.9E03 1.3E02 2.3E02
Kidneys 1.3E02 1.6E02 2.2E02 3.2E02 5.5E02
Liver 4.0E03 5.0E03 7.7E03 1.1E02 2.0E02
Lungs 2.8E03 3.7E03 5.5E03 8.5E03 1.6E02
Muscles 3.3E03 4.1E03 6.2E03 9.4E03 1.7E02
Oesophagus 2.8E03 3.6E03 5.4E03 8.5E03 1.6E02
Ovaries 8.8E03 1.1E02 1.6E02 2.4E02 4.0E02
Pancreas 4.9E03 6.2E03 1.0E02 1.5E02 2.5E02
Red marrow 3.8E03 4.6E03 6.8E03 9.5E03 1.6E02
Skin 2.0E03 2.4E03 3.8E03 6.0E03 1.1E02
Spleen 3.9E03 5.0E03 7.8E03 1.2E02 2.1E02
Testes 3.1E03 3.9E03 6.2E03 9.6E03 1.7E02
Thymus 2.8E03 3.6E03 5.4E03 8.5E03 1.6E02
Thyroid 5.5E03 8.2E03 1.3E02 2.6E02 4.7E02
Urinary bladder wall 1.7E02 2.2E02 3.2E02 4.2E02 5.6E02
Uterus 7.8E03 9.7E03 1.5E02 2.2E02 3.5E02
Remaining organs 3.8E03 4.9E03 7.6E03 1.2E02 2.0E02
225
Exercise
Adrenals 4.4E03 5.5E03 8.3E03 1.2E02 2.2E02
Bone surfaces 6.3E03 7.5E03 1.1E02 1.6E02 3.0E02
Brain 2.7E03 3.4E03 5.5E03 8.9E03 1.6E02
Breast 2.3E03 2.9E03 4.3E03 6.9E03 1.3E02
Gallbladder wall 2.7E02 3.2E02 4.2E02 7.3E02 2.3E01
Gastrointestinal tract
Stomach wall 4.6E03 6.1E03 9.8E03 1.4E02 2.4E02
Small intestine wall 1.1E02 1.4E02 2.2E02 3.4E02 6.1E02
Colon wall 1.8E02 2.2E02 3.7E02 5.8E02 1.1E01
(Upper large intestine wall 2.0E02 2.5E02 4.1E02 6.5E02 1.2E01)
(Lower large intestine wall 1.5E02 1.9E02 3.2E02 4.9E02 9.2E02)
Heart wall 5.2E03 6.5E03 9.7E03 1.5E02 2.5E02
Kidneys 1.0E02 1.2E02 1.7E02 2.5E02 4.3E02
Liver 3.3E03 4.1E03 6.3E03 9.2E03 1.6E02
Lungs 3.2E03 4.2E03 6.3E03 9.6E03 1.7E02
Muscles 3.5E03 4.3E03 6.5E03 9.9E03 1.8E02
Oesophagus 3.3E03 4.2E03 6.2E03 9.6E03 1.7E02
Ovaries 7.7E03 9.6E03 1.4E02 2.1E02 3.6E02
Pancreas 5.0E03 6.3E03 9.8E03 1.5E02 2.5E02
Red marrow 3.9E03 4.7E03 7.1E03 1.0E02 1.7E02
Skin 2.2E03 2.7E03 4.3E03 6.8E03 1.3E02
Spleen 4.1E03 5.2E03 8.2E03 1.2E02 2.2E02
Testes 3.4E03 4.3E03 6.6E03 1.0E02 1.8E02
Thymus 3.3E03 4.2E03 6.2E03 9.6E03 1.7E02
Thyroid 4.7E03 6.8E03 1.1E02 2.0E02 3.7E02
Urinary bladder wall 1.4E02 1.8E02 2.7E02 3.5E02 4.9E02
Uterus 7.0E03 8.7E03 1.3E02 2.0E02 3.2E02
Remaining organs 3.8E03 4.9E03 7.5E03 1.2E02 2.0E02
226
(C146) The same model is used as for indium-labelled leukocytes [see p. 255 in
Publication 53 (ICRP, 1987)], with the exception that, in view of the short physical
half-life, the retention half-times are set to infinity. For further information, the
reader is referred to Hanna et al. (1984), Kelbaek et al. (1985), and Schroth et al.
(1981).
99m
C.48.2. References for Tc-labelled leukocytes
Hanna, R., Braun, T., Levendel, A., Lomas, F., 1984. Radiochemistry and biostability of
autologous leukocytes labelled with 99mTc-stannous colloid in whole blood. Eur. J. Nucl.
Med. 9, 216–219.
ICRP, 1987. Radiation dose to patients from radiopharmaceuticals. ICRP Publication 53.
Ann. ICRP 18(1–4).
Kelbaek, H., Fogh, J., Gjorup, T., Bülow, K., Vestergaard, B., 1985. Scintigraphic demon-
stration of subcutaneous abscesses with 99mTc-labeled leukocytes. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. 10,
302–303.
Schroth, H.J., Oberhausen, E., Berberich, R., 1981. Cell labelling with colloidal substances in
whole blood. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. 6, 469–472.
227
99m
Table C.96. Biokinetic data for Tc-labelled leukocytes.
228
99m
Table C.97. Absorbed doses for Tc-labelled leukocytes.
229
111
C.49.2. References for In-labelled human immunoglobulin
Buijs, W.C.A.M., Oyen, W.J.G., Dams, E.T., et al., 1990. Dynamic distribution and dosi-
metric evaluation of human non-specific immunoglobulin G labelled with 111In or 99mTc.
Nucl. Med. Commun. 19, 743–751.
Claessens, R.A.M.J., Koenders, E.B., Solomon, H.F., et al., 1994. Pharmacokinetics of
111
In-14C-DTPA-IgG-123I in rats with a focal infection. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. 21, 832.
Datz, F.L., Castronovo, F.P., Christian, P.E., et al., 1995. Biodistribution and dosimetry of
indium-111-polyclonal IgG in normal subjects. J. Nucl. Med. 36, 2372–2379.
Fischman, A.J., Rubin, R.H., Khaw, B.A., et al., 1988. Detection of acute inflammation with
111In-labeled non-specific polyclonal IgG. Sem. Nucl. Med. 18, 335–344.
Morrel, E.M., Tompkins, R.G., Fischman, A.J., et al., 1989. Autoradiographic method for
quantitation of radiolabelled proteins in tissues using indium-111. J. Nucl. Med. 30,
1538–1545.
Oyen, W.J.G., Claessens, R.A.M.J., van Horn, J.R., et al., 1990. Scintigraphic detection of
bone and joint infections with indium-111-labelled non-specific polyclonal human immu-
noglobulin G. J. Nucl. Med. 31, 403–412.
230
111
Table C.98. Biokinetic data for In-labelled human immunoglobulin.
231
111
Table C.99. Absorbed doses for In-labelled human immunoglobulin.
232
111
C.50.2. References for In-labelled monoclonal tumour-associated antibodies
Bischof Delaloye, A., Delaloye, B., 1995. Radiolabelled monoclonal antibodies in tumour
imaging and therapy: out of fashion? Eur. J. Nucl. Med. 22, 571–580.
Britton, K.E., Granowska, M., 1987. Radioimmunoscintigraphy in tumour identification.
Cancer Surv. 6, 247–267.
Fishman, A.J., Khaw, B.A., Strauss, H.N., 1989. Quo vadis radioimmune imaging. J. Nucl.
Med. 20, 1911–1915.
ICRP, 1987. Radiation dose to patients from radiopharmaceuticals. ICRP Publication 53.
Ann. ICRP 18(1–4).
233
111
Table C.100. Biokinetic data for In-labelled monoclonal tumour-associated antibodies.
Intact antibody
Kidneys 0.03 24 0.5 1.2
96 0.5
Liver 0.50 24 0.5 21
96 0.5
Spleen 0.09 24 0.5 3.7
96 0.5
Red marrow 0.20 24 0.5 8.3
96 0.5
Other organs and tissues 0.18 24 0.5 7.5
96 0.5
*
Released indium 1.0 24 0.5
96 0.5
F(ab’)2 fragments
Kidneys 0.20 12 1.0 2.9
Liver 0.30 12 1.0 4.4
Spleen 0.06 12 1.0 0.88
Red marrow 0.10 12 1.0 1.5
Other organs and tissues 0.34 12 1.0 5.0
y
Released indium 1.0 12 1.0
F(ab’) fragments
Kidneys 0.40 6.0 1.0 3.2
Liver 0.10 6.0 1.0 0.80
Spleen 0.02 6.0 1.0 0.16
Red marrow 0.03 6.0 1.0 0.24
Other organs and tissues 0.45 6.0 1.0 3.6
z
Released indium 1.0 6.0 1.0
*To obtain the contribution from released indium, the cumulated activities given in the model for ionic
indium (ICRP, 1987) should be multiplied by 0.58.
y
To obtain the contribution from released indium, the cumulated activities given in the model for ionic
indium (ICRP, 1987) should be multiplied by 0.88.
z
To obtain the contribution from released indium, the cumulated activities given in the model for ionic
indium (ICRP, 1987) should be multiplied by 0.92.
234
111
Table C.101. Absorbed doses for In-labelled monoclonal tumour-associated antibodies.
Intact antibody
Adrenals 3.1E01 3.7E01 5.3E01 7.2E01 1.2E+00
Bone surfaces 3.2E01 3.6E01 5.7E01 9.4E01 1.6E+00
Brain 5.7E02 7.3E02 1.1E01 1.8E01 3.3E01
Breast 6.9E02 8.5E02 1.4E01 2.1E01 3.8E01
Gallbladder wall 3.8E01 4.3E01 6.0E01 9.2E01 1.6E+00
Gastrointestinal tract
Stomach wall 1.6E01 2.0E01 3.1E01 4.8E01 8.3E01
Small intestine wall 1.5E01 1.8E01 2.8E01 4.3E01 7.1E01
Colon wall 1.4E01 1.7E01 2.7E01 4.2E01 6.9E01
(Upper large intestine wall 1.6E01 2.0E01 3.2E01 5.1E01 8.4E01)
(Lower large intestine wall 1.1E01 1.4E01 2.1E01 3.0E01 4.9E01)
Heart wall 1.6E01 2.0E01 2.9E01 4.1E01 7.3E01
Kidneys 8.0E01 9.5E01 1.3E+00 1.9E+00 3.1E+00
Liver 1.1E+00 1.4E+00 2.0E+00 2.8E+00 4.8E+00
Lungs 1.4E01 1.8E01 2.6E01 3.8E01 6.7E01
Muscles 9.6E02 1.2E01 1.8E01 2.6E01 4.8E01
Oesophagus 8.6E02 1.0E01 1.5E01 2.2E01 3.8E01
Ovaries 1.2E01 1.5E01 2.2E01 3.3E01 5.5E01
Pancreas 2.9E01 3.5E01 5.3E01 8.0E01 1.3E+00
Red marrow 4.1E01 4.6E01 6.9E01 1.2E+00 2.8E+00
Skin 5.4E02 6.5E02 1.0E01 1.6E01 3.1E01
Spleen 1.1E+00 1.5E+00 2.2E+00 3.4E+00 5.9E+00
Testes 4.8E02 6.2E02 9.5E02 1.5E01 2.7E01
Thymus 8.6E02 1.0E01 1.5E01 2.2E01 3.8E01
Thyroid 6.6E02 8.2E02 1.2E01 2.0E01 3.6E01
Urinary bladder wall 7.8E02 9.9E02 1.6E01 2.4E01 4.1E01
Uterus 1.1E01 1.3E01 2.0E01 3.0E01 5.0E01
Remaining organs 1.0E01 1.3E01 2.0E01 3.0E01 5.1E01
235
F(ab’)2 fragments
Adrenals 2.7E01 3.3E01 4.7E01 6.6E01 1.1E+00
Bone surfaces 3.2E01 3.6E01 5.7E01 9.3E01 1.6E+00
Brain 6.5E02 8.3E02 1.3E01 2.0E01 3.8E01
Breast 6.6E02 8.2E02 1.3E01 1.9E01 3.5E01
Gallbladder wall 2.9E01 3.3E01 4.6E01 7.0E01 1.1E+00
Gastrointestinal tract
Stomach wall 1.4E01 1.7E01 2.7E01 4.0E01 6.8E01
Small intestine wall 1.5E01 1.8E01 2.8E01 4.1E01 6.7E01
Colon wall 1.4E01 1.7E01 2.6E01 3.9E01 6.4E01
(Upper large intestine wall 1.5E01 1.9E01 2.9E01 4.5E01 7.3E01)
(Lower large intestine wall 1.2E01 1.5E01 2.2E01 3.2E01 5.2E01)
Heart wall 1.4E01 1.7E01 2.5E01 3.5E01 6.2E01
Kidneys 1.2E+00 1.4E+00 1.9E+00 2.7E+00 4.6E+00
Liver 6.7E01 8.6E01 1.3E+00 1.7E+00 3.0E+00
Lungs 1.2E01 1.6E01 2.3E01 3.3E01 5.9E01
Muscles 9.5E02 1.2E01 1.8E01 2.6E01 4.7E01
Oesophagus 8.7E02 1.1E01 1.5E01 2.3E01 4.0E01
Ovaries 1.3E01 1.6E01 2.3E01 3.4E01 5.7E01
Pancreas 2.3E01 2.8E01 4.1E01 6.2E01 1.0E+00
Red marrow 4.0E01 4.5E01 6.8E01 1.2E+00 2.7E+00
Skin 5.6E02 6.7E02 1.1E01 1.7E01 3.1E01
Spleen 4.9E01 6.7E01 1.0E+00 1.5E+00 2.6E+00
Testes 5.7E02 7.3E02 1.1E01 1.7E01 3.1E01
Thymus 8.7E02 1.1E01 1.5E01 2.3E01 4.0E01
Thyroid 7.5E02 9.3E02 1.4E01 2.2E01 4.0E01
Urinary bladder wall 8.8E02 1.1E01 1.7E01 2.6E01 4.4E01
Uterus 1.2E01 1.4E01 2.1E01 3.2E01 5.2E01
Remaining organs 9.9E02 1.2E01 1.8E01 2.7E01 4.8E01
236
F(ab’) fragments
Adrenals 2.6E01 3.2E01 4.6E01 6.4E01 1.1E+00
Bone surfaces 3.2E01 3.6E01 5.7E01 9.4E01 1.6E+00
Brain 6.7E02 8.5E02 1.3E01 2.1E01 3.9E01
Breast 6.5E02 8.0E02 1.2E01 1.9E01 3.4E01
Gallbladder wall 2.7E01 3.0E01 4.3E01 6.5E01 1.0E+00
Gastrointestinal tract
Stomach wall 1.3E01 1.6E01 2.5E01 3.8E01 6.4E01
Small intestine wall 1.5E01 1.8E01 2.7E01 4.0E01 6.6E01
Colon wall 1.4E01 1.7E01 2.5E01 3.9E01 6.2E01
(Upper large intestine wall 1.5E01 1.8E01 2.8E01 4.4E01 7.0E01)
(Lower large intestine wall 1.2E01 1.5E01 2.2E01 3.2E01 5.2E01)
Heart wall 1.3E01 1.6E01 2.4E01 3.4E01 5.9E01
Kidneys 1.3E+00 1.5E+00 2.0E+00 2.9E+00 4.9E+00
Liver 5.9E01 7.5E01 1.1E+00 1.5E+00 2.6E+00
Lungs 1.2E01 1.5E01 2.2E01 3.2E01 5.7E01
Muscles 9.5E02 1.2E01 1.7E01 2.6E01 4.7E01
Oesophagus 8.7E02 1.1E01 1.5E01 2.3E01 4.0E01
Ovaries 1.3E01 1.6E01 2.3E01 3.5E01 5.7E01
Pancreas 2.2E01 2.6E01 3.9E01 5.8E01 9.4E01
Red marrow 4.0E01 4.5E01 6.9E01 1.2E+00 2.8E+00
Skin 5.6E02 6.7E02 1.1E01 1.7E01 3.1E01
Spleen 3.4E01 4.5E01 6.8E01 1.0E+00 1.7E+00
Testes 5.9E02 7.5E02 1.1E01 1.8E01 3.1E01
Thymus 8.7E02 1.1E01 1.5E01 2.3E01 4.0E01
Thyroid 7.6E02 9.5E02 1.4E01 2.3E01 4.0E01
Urinary bladder wall 9.0E02 1.1E01 1.7E01 2.6E01 4.4E01
Uterus 1.2E01 1.4E01 2.1E01 3.2E01 5.2E01
Remaining organs 9.7E02 1.2E01 1.8E01 2.7E01 4.7E01
237
111
C.51.2. References for In-labelled octreotide
Bajc, M., Palmer, J., Ohlsson, T., et al., 1994. Distribution and dosimetry of 111In DTPA-D-
Phe-octreotide in man assessed by whole body scintigraphy. Acta Radiol. 35, 53–57.
Claessens, R.A.M.J., Koenders, E.B., Boerman, O.C., et al., 1995. Dissociation of indium
from indium-111 labelled triamine penta acetic acid conjugated with non-specific polyclo-
nal human immunoglobulin G in inflammatory foci. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. 22, 212–219.
238
Forssell Aronsson, E., Fjälling, M., Nilsson, O., et al., 1995. 111In activity concentration in
human tissue samples after i.v. injection of 111In-DTPA-D-Phe-1-octreotide. J. Nucl. Med.
36, 7–12.
Forssell Aronsson, E., Lanhede, B., Fjälling, M., et al., 1999. Pharmacokinetics and dosimetry
of 111In-DTPA-D-Phe-1-octreotide in patients with neuroendocrine tumours. In: S-Stelson,
A.T., Stabin, M.G., Sparks, R.B. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth International
Radiopharmaceutical Dosimetry Symposium, Gatlinburg, TN, USA, May 7–10, 1996.
Oak Ridge Associated Universities, Oak Ridge, TN, USA, pp. 643–655.
ICRP, 1987. Radiation dose to patients from radiopharmaceuticals. ICRP Publication 53.
Ann. ICRP 18(1–4).
Koizumi, M., Endo, K., Watanabe, Y., et al., 1989. Pharamcokinetics of internally labeled
monoclonal antibodies in osteogenic sarcoma xenografts in nude mice. Cancer Res. 49,
1752–1757.
Krenning, E.P., Bakker, W.H., Kooij, P.P.M., et al., 1992. Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy
with indium-111-DTPA-D-Phe-1-octreotide in man: metabolism, dosimetry and compar-
ison with iodine-123-Tyr-3-octreotide. J. Nucl. Med. 33, 652–658.
Krenning, E.P., Kwekkeboom, D.J., Bakker, W.H., et al., 1993. Somatostatin receptor scinti-
graphy with (111In-DTPA-D-Phe1)-and 123I-Tyr3)-octreotide: the Rotterdam experience
with more than 1000 patients. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. 20, 716–731.
Leide-Svegborn, S., Nosslin, B., Mattsson, S., 1996. Biokinetics and dosimetry of 111In-
DTPA-D-Phe-1-octreotide in patients. In: S-Stelson, A.T., Stabin, M.G., Sparks, R.B.
(Eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth International Radiopharmaceutical Dosimetry
Symposium, Gatlinburg, TN, USA, May 7–10, 1996. Oak Ridge Associated Universities,
Oak Ridge, TN, USA, pp. 631–642.
Stabin, M.G., Kooij, P.P.M., Bakker, W.H., et al., 1997. Radiation dosimetry for indium-111-
pentetreotide. J. Nucl. Med. 38, 1919–1922.
111
Table C.102. Biokinetic data for In-labelled octreotide.
239
111
Table C.103. Absorbed doses for In-labelled octreotide.
240
(C153) The kinetic behaviour of iodide has been studied extensively, and several
biokinetic models have been suggested (Riggs, 1952; Berman et al., 1968; MIRD,
1975; Smith, 1988; Zanzonico, 2000; Johansson et al., 2003; Leggett, 2010). These
may be described either as compartment models or in terms of fractional uptakes and
half-times. The model presented in Publication 53 (ICRP, 1987) is a highly simplified
kinetic model presenting the absorbed dose for different thyroid uptakes, expressed
as the fractional distribution of iodide in the thyroid, Fs, in the range 0.05–0.55.
ICRP has published another model to be used for members of the public, including
occupational exposure to radioiodine, in Publications 56 and 67 (ICRP, 1990, 1993),
and this model is also a greatly simplified model, expressed as half-times and frac-
tional distributions. In addition to these models, Publication 88 (ICRP, 2001) pre-
sents a more complex compartment model for the biokinetics of iodine in a pregnant
mother and the fetus, with the aim of calculating the dose to the embryo and fetus.
(C154) The biokinetic model adopted for the present report was developed by
Leggett (2010). It is described as a compartment model including inorganic iodide
as well as organically bound iodine released to the body tissues following discharge
from the thyroid. For a more comprehensive discussion and description of the
model, the reader is referred to the original paper (Leggett, 2010). Applying the
transfer coefficients proposed by Leggett (Table C.104) results in 26% uptake of
131
I in the thyroid 24 h after administration. The same 24-h uptake is obtained
with the Publication 53 model if a fractional distribution in the thyroid, Fs, of 0.33
is used (ICRP, 1987). The adopted model is also well in accordance with the ICRP
model for occupational exposure (ICRP, 1990), where it is assumed that 0.3 of iodine
entering the blood is taken up by the thyroid.
(C155) The Leggett model, as presented in Fig. C.2, has, for the purpose of dose
calculations, been adjusted in order to be congruent with other radiopharmaceutical
models. The modifications are included in Table C.104.
. For the biokinetics of the gastrointestinal tract, the HAT model (ICRP, 2006)
has been used. The resulting cumulated activities in the different parts of the
colon have, for dose calculations thereafter, been redistributed to ULI and
LLI, as defined by the old gastrointestinal tract model (ICRP, 1979).
. An organ ‘kidneys 3’ has been introduced for the transfer of iodide to the
urinary bladder. The mean residence time in ‘kidneys 3’ is 5 min, which is in
accordance with other models for radiopharmaceutical dosimetry (ICRP,
1998).
(C156) The uptake of iodide in the normal thyroid depends on the dietary intake
of stable iodine (Stanbury et al., 1954; Zvonova, 1989) which varies in different
regions of the world. In order to take this variation into account, the Task Group
has chosen to include dose data for typical ‘low’ and ‘high’ thyroid uptake of iodide.
This has been accomplished by adjusting the transfer coefficient for thyroid uptake
(i.e. from blood to thyroid), aiming at 24-h uptake of 16% and 36%, respectively, for
241
131
I. For the Publication 53 model (ICRP, 1987), this is obtained if Fs is set to 0.20
and 0.45, respectively. All other transfer factors are independent of the uptake in
thyroid, including the release of organically bound iodine from the thyroid.
Blocked thyroid
(C157) In order to obtain the cumulated activities in different organs when the
thyroid has been blocked, the transfer between the compartments representing inor-
ganic iodide in the thyroid to the compartment for organically bound iodine is set to
zero. The dose to the thyroid in this case is thus only a result of uptake of iodide and
irradiation from other parts of the body. Incomplete blockage will, however, increase
the radiation dose to the thyroid; one may use dose data for the thyroid for different
uptakes to get some idea of the magnitude of this dose.
Age dependence
(C158) There is no significant age dependence of uptake in the thyroid after the
first few days after birth. However, for organically bound iodine, the biological half-
time of thyroid to blood shows distinct age dependence. The half-time in adults is 90
days, and 65, 50, 30, and 15 days for 15, 10, 5, and 1 year olds, respectively (Leggett,
2015). In general, the turnover rate of organically bound iodine, also between other
compartments, may be assumed to be faster (Leggett, 2015) with a transfer coefficient
approximately 50% larger for the youngest ages.
242
Leggett, R.W., 2010. A physiological systems model for iodine for use in radiation protection.
Radiat. Res. 174, 496–516.
Leggett, R.W., 2015. An age-specific biokinetic model for iodine. To be published.
MIRD, 1975. MIRD/Dose Estimate Report No. 7. Summary of current radiation dose esti-
mates to humans from 123I, 124I, 126I, 130I, and 131I as sodium rose bengal. J. Nucl.
Med. 16, 1214–1217.
Riggs, D.S., 1952. Quantitative aspects of iodine metabolism in man. Pharmacol. Rev. 4,
284–370.
Smith, T., 1988. A simplified recycling model for the dosimetry of radioiodide. Phys. Med.
Biol. 33, 1141–1157.
Stanbury, J.B., Brownell, G.L., Riggs, D.L., et al., 1954. Endemic Goiter. The Adaption of
Man to Iodide Deficiency. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Zanzonico, P.B., 2000. Age-dependent thyroid absorbed doses for radiobiologically significant
radioisotopes of iodine. Health Phys. 78, 60–67.
Zvonova, I.A., 1989. Dietary intake of stable I and some aspects of radioiodine dosimetry.
Health Phys. 78, 471–475.
243
Fig. C.2. Compartment model used to describe the kinetics of iodine (Leggett, 2010).
244
245
246
247
Ãs/A0, time-integrated activity (cumulated activity) in organ S for adults. (continued on next page)
248
Table C.105.(continued)
15 years Ã/A0 (h)
249
250
Table C.105.(continued)
251
Table C.105.(continued)
10 years Ã/A0 (h) (as for Adult and 15 year above and as for 5 years and 1 year below)
252
Table C.105.(continued)
253
254
Table C.105.(continued)
255
256
123
Table C.106. Absorbed doses for I-iodide.
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
124
Table C.107. Absorbed doses for I-iodide.
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
125
Table C.108. Absorbed doses for I-iodide.
273
274
275
276
131
Table C.109. Absorbed doses for I-iodide.
277
278
279
280
(C159) Free fatty acids are major energy sources for the myocardium, and iodine-
labelled free fatty acids are used to study the energy metabolism of the heart. Long-
chain fatty acids are taken up rapidly by the heart and metabolised by b-oxidation
(Tamaki et al., 2000). The first iodine-labelled free fatty acids that were developed
had the disadvantage of excessive release of radioiodide. This was overcome by the
introduction of 123I-para-iodophenyl pentadecanoic acid (123I-IPPA), a terminally
phenylated straight-chain fatty acid, where the iodine was substituted in the phenyl
group (Machulla et al., 1980; Reske et al., 1982; Reske, 1985; Dudzcak et al., 1986).
(C160) The rapid clearance of 123I-IPPA from the myocardium is, however, a
problem when tomography (SPECT) is performed. This problem has been overcome
by the introduction of a methyl group on the 3-carbon of the fatty acid. 3-Methyl-
branched fatty acids are metabolised in the peroxisomes by initial a-oxidation fol-
lowed by peroxisomal b-oxidation, a process that is slower than mitochondrial
b-oxidation (Casteels et al., 2003). This principle was first used by Knapp et al.
(1986) by the introduction of b-methyl-p-(123I)-iodophenylpentadecanoic acid (123I-
BMIPP) [see references in Knapp and Kropp (1995)].
(C161) After intravenous injection, 123I-IPPA and 123I-BMIPP are cleared rapidly
from the blood (biological half-time 2.5–3.0 min) (Knapp et al., 1995) due to fast
uptake in various organs and tissues (Torizuka et al., 1991; Yoshizumi et al., 2000).
Whole-body pictures shortly after the injection (Torizuka et al., 1991; Sloof et al.,
1997; Caveliers et al., 1998; Yoshizumi et al., 2000) show a concentration of activity
in liver and heart, and uniform distribution in the rest of the body.
(C162) After uptake, only some 123I-IPPA and 123I-BMIPP will be metabolised
immediately to water-soluble low-molecular-weight products. 123I-IPPA is, to a large
extent, metabolised like long-chain fatty acids by rapid mitochondrial b-oxidation,
resulting in p-(123I)-iodobenzoic acid which is excreted in a conjugated form in the
urine. The metabolism of 123I-BMIPP is slower than that of 123I-IPPA due to the
methyl group on the b-carbon. The end product is p-(123I)-iodophenyl acetic acid,
which is also excreted as a conjugate in the urine. In either case, no release of free
iodine has been detected. The initially unmetabolised part of 123I-IPPA and
123
I-BMIPP will become incorporated into the fat stores in the body, which have
slow turnover thus causing considerably delayed metabolism.
(C163) Time–activity curves for the heart and liver indicate bi-exponential elim-
ination of 123I-BMIPP (Torizuka et al., 1991; De Geeter et al., 1998). Out of these
curves, initial uptake has been calculated to be 5.0–5.7% of the activity administered
(excluding blood activity) in the heart and 13–14% in the liver. For 123I-BMIPP, the
biological half-time of the fast phase is approximately 1 h, and that of the slow phase
is approximately 2 days. The fast phase corresponds to a fraction of 0.43 of uptake in
the heart. In the liver, the fast-eliminated fraction is 0.33–0.36. The final metabolite is
excreted via the kidneys and urinary bladder. After 16 h, 15% (Dudzcak et al., 1986)
has been excreted, and this increases to 22.6% after 24 h (Torizuka et al., 1991).
281
There are no data for 123I-BMIPP covering longer time periods, but from studies on
labelled fatty acids (Gunnarsson et al., 2003), one must assume uptake into body fat
and, consequently, slow turnover of part of the administered activity.
(C164) The biokinetic model for 123I-BMIPP adopted here assumes initial uptake
of 6% of the administered activity in the heart and 14% in the liver. The rest is
assumed to be distributed uniformly in the remaining organs and tissues. From the
heart, 40% is excreted with a biological half-time of 1 h and 60% with a half-time of
48 h. For the liver, the fractions are 30% and 70%, respectively. Elimination from the
rest of the body is assumed to be bi-exponential, with a fast phase with a half-time of
48 h and a slow phase with a half-time exceeding 100 h (Gunnarsson et al., 2003).
(C165) The faster phase corresponds to the combined fast and slow phases of the
heart and liver, and represents the turnover of a more dynamic fat pool of the body.
The slow phase represents the turnover of the rest of the body fat. The size of the
latter long-lasting pool is taken to be 20% of the administered activity; a high value
according to data in the literature (Gunnarsson et al., 2003).
(C166) For 123I-IPPA, there are no data suitable for dose estimations. Initial
uptake in the heart, liver, and other organs and tissues is assumed to be the same
as for 123I-BMIPP. The first-phase elimination from heart and liver, however, should
be much faster as b-oxidation is not inhibited. The model assumes a half-time that is
five times lower (i.e. a biological half-time of 10 min for the initial fast phase). For the
slow phase of the heart and liver, and for elimination from the rest of the body, the
same figures are used as in the 123I-BMIPP model. Note that the models are intended
for 123I only.
123
C.53.2. References for I-labelled fatty acids
Casteels, M., Foulon, V., Mannaerts, G.P., van Veldhoven, P., 2003. Alpha-oxidation of
3-methyl-substituted fatty acids and its thiamine dependence. Eur. J. Biochem. 270,
1619–1627.
Caveliers, V., Franken, P.R., Florian, F.L., Lou, H., Knapp, F.F. Jr, 1998. Intra-individual
comparison of 3(R)-BMIPP and 3(S)-BMIPP isomers in humans. J. Nucl. Med. 39,
1672–1675.
De Geeter, F., Caveliers, V., Pansar, I., Bossuyt, A., Franken, P.R., 1998. Effect of oral
glucose loading on the biodistribution of BMIPP in normal volunteers. J. Nucl. Med.
39, 1850–1856.
Dudzcak, R., Schmoliner, R., Angelberger, P., Knapp, F.F., Goodman, M.M., 1986.
Structurally modified fatty acids: clinical potential as tracers of metabolism. Eur. J.
Nucl. Med. 12, S45–S48.
Gunnarsson, M., Stenström, K., Leide-Svegborn, S., et al., 2003. Biokinetics and radiation
dosimetry for patients undergoing a glycerol tri[1-14C]oleate fat malabsorption breath test.
Appl. Radiat. Isot. 58, 517–526.
Knapp, F.F. Jr, Ambrose, K.R., Goodman, M.M., 1986. New radioiodinated methyl-
branched fatty acids for cardiac studies. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. 12(Suppl.), S39–S44.
Knapp, F.F. Jr, Franken, P., Kropp, J., 1995. Cardiac SPECT with iodine-123-labeled fatty
acids: evaluation of myocardial viability with BMIPP. J. Nucl. Med. 36, 1022–1030.
282
Knapp, F.F. Jr, Kropp, J., 1995. Iodine-123-labelled fatty acids for myocardial single-photon
emission tomography: current status and future perspectives. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. 22,
361–381.
Machulla, H.J., Marsmann, M., Dutschka, K., 1980. Biochemical concept and synthesis of a
radioiodinated phenyl fatty acid for in vivo metabolic studies of the myocardium. Eur. J.
Nucl. Med. 5, 171–173.
Reske, S.N., Biersack, H.J., Lackner, K., et al., 1982. Assessment of regional myocardial
uptake and metabolism of omega-(p-123I-phenyl) pentadecanoic acid with serial single-
photon emission tomography. Nuklearmedizin 21, 249–253.
Reske, S.N., 1985. 123I-phenylpentadecanoic acid as a tracer of cardiac free fatty acid meta-
bolism. Experimental and clinical results. Eur. Heart J. 6(Suppl. B), 39–47.
Sloof, G.W., Visser, F.C., van Lingen, A., et al., 1997. Evaluation of heart-to-organ ratios of
123
I-BMIPP and the dimethyl-substituted 123I-DMIPP fatty acid analogue in humans.
Nucl. Med. Commun. 18, 1065–1070.
Tamaki, N., Morita, K., Kuge, Y., Tsukamoto, E., 2000. The role of fatty acids in cardiac
imaging. J. Nucl. Med. 41, 1525–1534.
Torizuka, K., Yonekura, Y., Nishimura, T., et al., 1991. The phase 1 study of b-methyl-p-
(123I)-iodophenyl-pentadecanoic acid (123I-BMIPP). Kagu Igaku 28, 681–690.
Yoshizumi, T., Nozaki, S., Fukuchi, K., et al., 2000. Pharamacokinetics and metabolism of
123
I-BMIPP fatty acid analog in healthy and CD36-deficient subjects. J. Nucl. Med. 41,
1134–1138.
283
Table C.111. Biokinetic data for 123I-labelled fatty acids (123I-para-iodophenyl pentadecanoic
acid).
284
123
Table C.112. Absorbed doses for I-labelled fatty acids [beta-methyl-p-(123I)-iodophenyl-
pentadecanoic acid].
285
Table C.113. Absorbed doses for 123I-labelled fatty acids (123I-para-iodophenyl pentadecanoic
acid).
286
(C167) A large number of radiopharmaceuticals labelled with 18F and 123I have
been developed for PET and SPECT studies of different types of receptor in the
human brain. For many of these substances, the available biokinetic data are insuffi-
cient to construct realistic compound-specific biokinetic models for the calculation of
absorbed dose to persons undergoing an investigation. Therefore, a generic model
for radionuclide-labelled brain receptor substances that would predict the internal
radiation dose with sufficient accuracy for general radiation protection purposes has
been developed.
(C168) A generic model for 11C-labelled brain receptor substances has been pub-
lished (Nosslin et al., 2003). A review of the literature has identified biokinetic and
dosimetric data for five 18F-labelled and 15 123I-labelled compounds considered to be
potential substances for the clinical imaging of brain receptors (e.g. acetylcholines-
terase receptors, benzodiazepine receptors, dopamine receptors, dopamine transpor-
ters, and serotonin receptors). These data indicate that despite fairly large differences
in chemical structure, the patterns of uptake in the human brain, and other tissues
for which information are available, appear to be sufficiently similar to justify a
generic model for each radionuclide.
(C169) For some compounds, the published data on the dosimetry of 18F- and
123
I-labelled receptor radiopharmaceuticals were derived from PET and SPECT
studies in humans, and for other compounds, the biokinetic models were derived,
at least in part, from studies of biodistribution in experimental animals.
(C170) For the 123I model, it is assumed that fractions of 0.06 and 0.003 of the
administered activity are distributed instantaneously to brain and thyroid, respec-
tively. The activity is excreted from these tissues with a biological half-time of 100 h
(i.e. more than 99% of 123I will decay in situ). It is also assumed that 0.20 of the
administered activity is distributed instantaneously to the lungs and then excreted
with a biological half-time of 8 h. Fractions of 0.20 and 0.03 are assumed to be
deposited in the liver and the kidneys, and are excreted bi-exponentially with biolo-
gical half-times of 8 h (50%) and 100 h (50%), respectively. Thirty percent of the
activity uptake in liver is eliminated via the gallbladder, and the remainder of the
liver uptake is passed directly into the small intestine. It is assumed that 75% of the
administered 123I is excreted in the urine and 25% via the gastrointestinal tract.
123
C.54.2. References for I-labelled brain receptor substances (generic model)
Booij, J., Sokole, E.B., Stabin, M.G., Janssen, A.G.M., de Bruin, K., van Royen, E.A., 1998.
Human biodistribution and dosimetry of [123I]FP-CIT: a potent radioligand for imaging of
dopamine transporters. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. 25, 24–30.
Booij, J., Sokole, E.B., Stabin, M.G., Janssen, A.G.M., de Bruin, K., van Royen, E.A., 1998.
Human biodistribution and dosimetry of [123I]FP-CIT: a potent radioligand for imaging of
dopamine transporters: erratum. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. 25, 458.
287
Boundy, K.L., Barnden, L.R., Rowe, C.C., et al., 1995. Human dosimetry and biodistribution
of iodine-123-iododexetimide: a SPECT imaging agent for cholinergic muscarinic neuror-
eceptors. J. Nucl. Med. 36, 1332–1338.
Deterding, T.A., Votaw, J.R., Wang, C.K., et al., 2001. Biodistribution and radiation dosi-
metry of the dopamine transporter ligand [18F]FECNT. J. Nucl. Med. 42, 376–381.
Gründer, G., Siessmeier, T., Lange-Asschenfeldt, C., et al., 2001. [18F]Fluoroethylflumaazenil:
a novel tracer for PET imaging of human benzodiazepine receptors. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. 28,
1463–1470.
Gründer, G., Siessmeier, T., Piel, M., et al., 2003. Quantification of D2-like dopamine recep-
tors in the human brain with [18F]-desmethoxyfallypride. J. Nucl. Med. 44, 109–116.
Kauppinen, T.A., Bergström, K.A., Heikman, P., Hiltunen, J., Ahonen, A.K., 2003.
Biodistribution and radiation dosimetry of [123I]ADAM in healthy human subjects: pre-
liminary results. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. 30, 132–136.
Kuikka, J.T., Bergström, K.A., Ahonen, A., Länsimies, E., 1994. The dosimetry of iodine-123
labelled 2b-carbomethoxy-3b-(4-iodophenyl)tropane. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. 21, 53–56.
Mitterhauser, M., Wadsak, W., Wabnegger, L., et al., 2004. Biological evaluation of
20 -[18F]fluoroflumazenil ([18F]FFMZ) a potential GABA receptor ligand for PET. Nucl.
Med. Biol. 31, 291–295.
Mozley, P.D., Stubbs, J.T., Kim, H-J., et al., 1995. Dosimetry of a D2/D3 dopamine receptor
antagonist that can be used with PET or SPECT. J. Nucl. Med. 36, 1322–1331.
Mozley, P.D., Stubbs, J.T., Kim, H-J., et al., 1996. Dosimetry of an iodine-123-labeled tro-
pane to image dopamine transporters. J. Nucl. Med. 37, 151–159.
Nosslin, B., Johansson, L., Leide-Svegborn, S., Liniecki, J., Mattsson, S., Taylor, D.M., 2003.
A generic model for [11C]-labelled radiopharmaceuticals for imaging receptors in the
human brain. Rad. Prot. Dosim. 105, 587–591.
Taylor, D.M., 2000. Unpublished assessments.
van de Wiele, C., De Vos, F., De Sutter, J., et al., 1999. Biokinetics and dosimetry of (iodine-
123)-iodomethyl-N,N-dimethyltamoxifen, an (anti)oestrogen receptor radioligand. Eur. J.
Nucl. Med. 26, 1259–1264.
Verhoeff, N.P., Sokole, E.B., Stabin, M., et al., 1993. Dosimetry of iodine-123 iodobenzamide
in healthy volunteers. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. 20, 747–752.
Verhoeff, N.P., Busemann Sokole, E., Hengst, D., Stubbs, J.B., van Royen, E.A., 1993.
Dosimetry of iodine-123 iomazenil in humans. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. 20, 580–584.
Versijpt, J., Dumont, F., Thierens, H., et al., 2000. Biodistribution and dosimetry of [123I]iodo-
PK 11195: a potential agent for SPET imaging of the peripheral benzodiazepine receptor.
Eur. J. Nucl. Med. 27, 1326–1333.
Votaw, J.R., Ansari, M.S., Scott Mason, N., et al., 1995. Dosimetry of iodine-123-epidepride:
a dopamine D2 receptor ligand. J. Nucl. Med. 36, 1316–1321.
Volkow, N.D., Ding, Y-S., Fowler, J.S., et al., 1995. A new PET ligand for the dopamine
transporter: studies in human brain. J. Nucl. Med. 36, 2162–2168.
Waterhouse, R.N., Stabin, M.G., Page, J.G., 2003. Preclinical acute toxicity studies and
rodent-based dosimetry estimates of the novel sigma-1 receptor radiotracer [18F]FPS.
Nucl. Med. Biol. 30, 555–563.
288
123
Table C.114. Biokinetic data for I-labelled brain receptor substances (generic model).
289
123
Table C.115. Absorbed doses for I-labelled brain receptor substances (generic model).
290
291
123
from the values presented here. Note that the models are intended for I-labelled
substance only.
123
C.55.2. References for I-labelled 2ß-carbomethoxy 3ß-(4-iodophenyl)-N-(3-fluoro-
propyl) nortropane
Abi-Dargham, A., Innis, R.B., Wisniewski, G., Baldwin, R.M., Neumeyer, J.L., Seibyl, J.P.,
1997. Human biodistribution and dosimetry of iodine-123-fluoroalkyl analogs of ß-CIT.
Eur. J. Nucl. Med. 24, 1422–1425.
Booij, J., Tissingh, G., Winogrodzka, A., et al., 1997. Practical beneEt of [123I]FP-CIT SPET
in the demonstration of the dopaminergic deEcit in Parkinson’s disease. Eur. J. Nucl. Med.
24, 68–71.
Booij, J., Busemann Sokole, E., Stabin, M.G., Janssen, A.G., de Bruin, K., van Royen, E.A.,
1998. Human biodistribution and dosimetry of [123I]FPCIT: a potent radioligand for ima-
ging of dopamine transporters. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. 25, 24–30.
Booij, J., de Jong, J., de Bruin, K., Knol, R., de Win, M.M., van Eck-Smit, B.L., 2007.
Quantification of striatal dopamine transporters with 123I-FP-CIT SPECT is influenced
by the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor paroxetine: a double-blind, placebo-
controlled, crossover study in healthy control subjects. J. Nucl. Med. 48, 359–366.
Colloby, S.J., O’Brien, J.T., Fenwick, J.D., et al., 2004. The application of statistical para-
metric mapping to 123I-FP-CIT SPECT in dementia with Lewy bodies, Alzheimer’s disease
and Parkinson’s disease. Neuroimage 23, 956–966.
ICRP, 1987. Radiation dose to patients from radiopharmaceuticals. ICRP Publication 53.
Ann. ICRP 18(1–4).
Lim, S.M., KatsiEs, A., Villemagne, V.L., et al., 2009. The 18F-FDG PET cingulate island sign
and comparison to 123I-beta-CIT SPECT for diagnosis of dementia with Lewy bodies.
J. Nucl. Med. 50, 1638–1645.
Sydoff, M., Lizana, H., Mattsson, S., Stabin, M.G., Leide-Svegborn, S., 2013. Determination
of the biodistribution and dosimetry of 123I-FP-CIT in male patients with suspected
Parkinsonism or Lewy body dementia using planar and combined planar and SPECT/
CT imaging. Appl. Radiat. Isotopes 82, 300–307.
Tavola, F., Janzen, T., Giussani, A., et al., 2012. Non-linear compartmental model of 18F-
choline. Nucl. Med. Biol. 39, 261–268.
Tolosa, E., Borght, T.V., Moreno, E., 2007. Accuracy of DaTSCAN (123I-Ioflupane) SPECT
in diagnosis of patients with clinically uncertain parkinsonism: 2-year follow-up of an
open-label study. Mov. Disord. 22, 2346–2351.
Walker, Z., Costa, D.C., Walker, R.W., et al., 2004. Striatal dopamine transporter in demen-
tia with Lewy bodies and Parkinson disease: a comparison. Neurology 62, 1568–1572.
292
293
123
Table C.117. Absorbed doses for I-labelled 2ß-carbomethoxy 3ß-(4-iodophenyl)-N-(3-
fluoropropyl) nortropane.
294
(C175) The models for iodine-labelled antibodies and fragments are the same as
those used for the corresponding technetium-labelled substances (see Section C.41.1),
with the modification that released iodine is assumed to be handled by the body
according to the model proposed for iodine with blocking of uptake in the thyroid
(ICRP, 1987, p. 275). The reader is referred to Bischof Delaloye and Delaloye (1995),
Britton and Granowska (1987), and Fishman et al. (1989) for further information.
This biokinetic model is not intended to apply to therapeutic use of the substance.
123
C.56.2. References for I-labelled monoclonal tumour-associated antibodies
Bischof Delaloye, A., Delaloye, B., 1995. Radiolabelled monoclonal antibodies in tumour
imaging and therapy: out of fashion? Eur. J. Nucl. Med. 22, 571–580.
Britton, K.E., Granowska, M., 1987. Radioimmunoscintigraphy in tumour identification.
Cancer Surv. 6, 247–267.
Fishman, A.J., Khaw, B.A., Strauss, H.N., 1989. Quo vadis radioimmune imaging. J. Nucl.
Med. 20, 1911–1915.
ICRP, 1987. Radiation dose to patients from radiopharmaceuticals. ICRP Publication 53.
Ann. ICRP 18(1–4).
295
123
Table C.118. Biokinetic data for I-labelled monoclonal tumour-associated antibodies.
Intact antibody
Kidneys 0.03 24 0.5 0.44
96 0.5
Liver 0.50 24 0.5 7.3
96 0.5
Spleen 0.09 24 0.5 1.3
96 0.5
Red marrow 0.20 24 0.5 2.9
96 0.5
Other organs and tissues 0.18 24 0.5 2.6
96 0.5
*
Released iodine 1.0 24 0.5
96 0.5
F(ab’)2 fragments
Kidneys 0.20 12 1.0 1.8
Liver 0.30 12 1.0 2.7
Spleen 0.06 12 1.0 0.54
Red marrow 0.10 12 1.0 0.91
Other organs and tissues 0.34 12 1.0 3.1
y
Released iodine 1.0 12 1.0
F(ab’) fragments
Kidneys 0.40 6.0 1.0 2.4
Liver 0.10 6.0 1.0 0.60
Spleen 0.02 6.0 1.0 0.12
Red marrow 0.03 6.0 1.0 0.18
Other organs and tissues 0.45 6.0 1.0 2.7
z
Released iodine 1.0 6.0 1.0
*To obtain the contribution from released 123I, the cumulated activity given in the model for iodide with
blocked thyroid should be multiplied by 0.24.
y
To obtain the contribution from released 123I, the cumulated activity given in the model for iodide with
blocked thyroid should be multiplied by 0.52.
z
To obtain the contribution from released 123I, the cumulated activity given in the model for iodide with
blocked thyroid should be multiplied by 0.69.
296
123
Table C.119. Absorbed doses for I-labelled monoclonal tumour-associated antibodies.
Intact antibody
Adrenals 2.7E02 3.4E02 5.0E02 6.9E02 1.1E01
Bone surfaces 3.2E02 3.7E02 6.0E02 1.0E01 1.8E01
Brain 4.5E03 5.8E03 9.0E03 1.5E02 2.8E02
Breast 6.0E03 7.4E03 1.2E02 1.9E02 3.7E02
Gallbladder wall 4.0E02 4.8E02 6.7E02 1.0E01 1.9E01
Gastrointestinal tract
Stomach wall 1.5E02 1.9E02 3.2E02 5.1E02 9.2E02
Small intestine wall 1.2E02 1.5E02 2.4E02 3.9E02 6.9E02
Colon wall 1.2E02 1.4E02 2.4E02 4.0E02 6.8E02
(Upper large intestine wall 1.4E02 1.7E02 3.0E02 5.0E02 8.6E02)
(Lower large intestine wall 8.6E03 1.1E02 1.7E02 2.6E02 4.4E02)
Heart wall 1.4E02 1.8E02 2.8E02 4.2E02 7.7E02
Kidneys 5.9E02 7.2E02 1.0E01 1.5E01 2.5E01
Liver 1.5E01 1.9E01 2.9E01 4.0E01 7.3E01
Lungs 1.4E02 1.8E02 2.7E02 4.0E02 7.2E02
Muscles 8.5E03 1.1E02 1.6E02 2.4E02 4.5E02
Oesophagus 6.9E03 8.6E03 1.3E02 2.0E02 3.5E02
Ovaries 9.4E03 1.2E02 1.9E02 2.9E02 5.0E02
Pancreas 3.0E02 3.7E02 5.8E02 8.9E02 1.5E01
Red marrow 3.7E02 4.2E02 6.7E02 1.3E01 3.0E01
Skin 4.7E03 5.7E03 9.1E03 1.5E02 2.8E02
Spleen 2.0E01 2.9E01 4.4E01 6.7E01 1.2E+00
Testes 4.3E03 5.6E03 9.0E03 1.4E02 2.6E02
Thymus 6.9E03 8.6E03 1.3E02 2.0E02 3.5E02
Thyroid 5.1E03 6.5E03 1.0E02 1.7E02 3.1E02
Urinary bladder wall 2.4E02 3.1E02 4.6E02 6.3E02 8.6E02
Uterus 9.3E03 1.2E02 1.9E02 2.9E02 5.0E02
Remaining organs 9.0E03 1.1E02 1.7E02 2.6E02 4.6E02
297
F(ab’)2 fragments
Adrenals 2.1E02 2.7E02 4.1E02 6.1E02 1.1E01
Bone surfaces 1.9E02 2.3E02 3.6E02 5.9E02 1.1E01
Brain 5.6E03 7.0E03 1.1E02 1.9E02 3.4E02
Breast 5.6E03 7.0E03 1.1E02 1.7E02 3.3E02
Gallbladder wall 2.3E02 2.8E02 4.0E02 6.0E02 1.0E01
Gastrointestinal tract
Stomach wall 1.2E02 1.6E02 2.5E02 3.8E02 6.7E02
Small intestine wall 1.1E02 1.4E02 2.3E02 3.7E02 6.5E02
Colon wall 1.1E02 1.4E02 2.2E02 3.5E02 6.2E02
(Upper large intestine wall 1.2E02 1.5E02 2.4E02 3.9E02 6.8E02)
(Lower large intestine wall 9.8E03 1.2E02 1.9E02 3.0E02 5.4E02)
Heart wall 1.1E02 1.3E02 2.1E02 3.1E02 5.7E02
Kidneys 1.7E01 2.0E01 2.8E01 4.1E01 7.1E01
Liver 6.0E02 7.7E02 1.2E01 1.6E01 2.9E01
Lungs 1.0E02 1.3E02 2.0E02 3.0E02 5.6E02
Muscles 8.3E03 1.0E02 1.6E02 2.4E02 4.6E02
Oesophagus 7.0E03 8.9E03 1.4E02 2.1E02 3.9E02
Ovaries 1.0E02 1.3E02 2.0E02 3.2E02 5.8E02
Pancreas 2.0E02 2.5E02 3.9E02 5.9E02 1.0E01
Red marrow 1.7E02 1.9E02 3.0E02 5.2E02 1.1E01
Skin 5.0E03 6.1E03 9.7E03 1.6E02 3.0E02
Spleen 9.3E02 1.3E01 2.0E01 3.0E01 5.3E01
Testes 6.4E03 8.3E03 1.3E02 2.1E02 4.1E02
Thymus 7.0E03 8.9E03 1.4E02 2.1E02 3.9E02
Thyroid 6.4E03 8.1E03 1.3E02 2.1E02 4.0E02
Urinary bladder wall 4.7E02 6.1E02 8.9E02 1.3E01 2.4E01
Uterus 1.2E02 1.5E02 2.4E02 3.8E02 6.8E02
Remaining organs 8.8E03 1.1E02 1.7E02 2.7E02 4.8E02
298
F(ab’) fragments
Adrenals 1.7E02 2.3E02 3.6E02 5.5E02 9.9E02
Bone surfaces 1.4E02 1.7E02 2.7E02 4.2E02 8.3E02
Brain 5.9E03 7.4E03 1.2E02 2.0E02 3.6E02
Breast 5.2E03 6.6E03 9.8E03 1.6E02 3.0E02
Gallbladder wall 1.4E02 1.7E02 2.6E02 4.0E02 6.1E02
Gastrointestinal tract
Stomach wall 1.0E02 1.3E02 2.1E02 3.1E02 5.3E02
Small intestine wall 1.1E02 1.4E02 2.2E02 3.4E02 6.0E02
Colon wall 1.1E02 1.4E02 2.1E02 3.2E02 5.4E02
(Upper large intestine wall 1.1E02 1.4E02 2.1E02 3.3E02 5.6E02)
(Lower large intestine wall 1.0E02 1.3E02 2.0E02 3.0E02 5.2E02)
Heart wall 8.5E03 1.1E02 1.7E02 2.5E02 4.6E02
Kidneys 2.2E01 2.6E01 3.6E01 5.1E01 8.9E01
Liver 1.8E02 2.3E02 3.5E02 5.0E02 8.8E02
Lungs 7.8E03 1.0E02 1.6E02 2.4E02 4.6E02
Muscles 8.0E03 9.9E03 1.5E02 2.3E02 4.3E02
Oesophagus 6.8E03 8.7E03 1.3E02 2.1E02 3.9E02
Ovaries 1.1E02 1.3E02 2.1E02 3.2E02 5.6E02
Pancreas 1.5E02 1.8E02 2.8E02 4.3E02 7.4E02
Red marrow 8.8E03 1.0E02 1.6E02 2.4E02 4.4E02
Skin 5.0E03 6.1E03 9.7E03 1.6E02 2.9E02
Spleen 3.0E02 4.1E02 6.3E02 9.6E02 1.7E01
Testes 7.2E03 9.3E03 1.5E02 2.3E02 4.1E02
Thymus 6.8E03 8.7E03 1.3E02 2.1E02 3.9E02
Thyroid 6.7E03 8.6E03 1.4E02 2.3E02 4.2E02
Urinary bladder wall 6.1E02 7.9E02 1.1E01 1.5E01 1.9E01
Uterus 1.3E02 1.7E02 2.7E02 3.9E02 6.3E02
Remaining organs 8.1E03 1.0E02 1.6E02 2.4E02 4.3E02
299
(C176) The models for iodine-labelled antibodies and fragments are the same as
those used for the corresponding technetium-labelled substances (see Section C.41.1),
with the modification that released iodine is assumed to be handled by the body
according to the model proposed for iodine with blocking of uptake in the thyroid
(ICRP, 1987, p. 275). The reader is referred to Bischof Delaloye and Delaloye (1995),
Britton and Granowska (1987), and Fishman et al. (1989) for further information.
This biokinetic model is not intended to apply to therapeutic use of the substance.
131
C.57.2. References for I-labelled monoclonal tumour-associated antibodies
Bischof Delaloye, A., Delaloye, B., 1995. Radiolabelled monoclonal antibodies in tumour
imaging and therapy: out of fashion? Eur. J. Nucl. Med. 22, 571–580.
Britton, K.E., Granowska, M., 1987. Radioimmunoscintigraphy in tumour identification.
Cancer Surv. 6, 247–267.
Fishman, A.J., Khaw, B.A., Strauss, H.N., 1989. Quo vadis radioimmune imaging. J. Nucl.
Med. 20, 1911–1915.
ICRP, 1987. Radiation dose to patients from radiopharmaceuticals. ICRP Publication 53.
Ann. ICRP 18(1–4).
300
131
Table C.120. Biokinetic data for I-labelled monoclonal tumour-associated antibodies.
Intact antibody
Kidneys 0.03 24 0.5 1.9
96 0.5
Liver 0.50 24 0.5 31
96 0.5
Spleen 0.09 24 0.5 5.5
96 0.5
Red marrow 0.20 24 0.5 12
96 0.5
Other organs and tissues 0.18 24 0.5 11
96 0.5
*
Released iodine 1.0 24 0.5
96 0.5
F(ab’)2 fragments
Kidneys 0.20 12 1.0 3.3
Liver 0.30 12 1.0 4.9
Spleen 0.06 12 1.0 0.98
Red marrow 0.10 12 1.0 1.6
Other organs and tissues 0.34 12 1.0 5.5
y
Released iodine 1.0 12 1.0
F(ab’) fragments
Kidneys 0.40 6.0 1.0 3.4
Liver 0.10 6.0 1.0 0.84
Spleen 0.02 6.0 1.0 0.17
Red marrow 0.03 6.0 1.0 0.25
Other organs and tissues 0.45 6.0 1.0 3.8
z
Released iodine 1.0 6.0 1.0
*To obtain the contribution from released 131I, the cumulated activity given in the model for iodide with
blocked thyroid should be multiplied by 0.78.
y
To obtain the contribution from released 131I, the cumulated activity given in the model for iodide with
blocked thyroid should be multiplied by 0.94.
z
To obtain the contribution from released 131I, the cumulated activity given in the model for iodide with
blocked thyroid should be multiplied by 0.97.
301
131
Table C.121. Absorbed doses for I-labelled monoclonal antibodies.
Intact antibody
Adrenals 2.6E01 3.2E01 4.7E01 6.6E01 1.1E+00
Bone surfaces 4.5E01 4.7E01 8.1E01 1.4E+00 2.3E+00
Brain 6.2E02 7.9E02 1.3E01 2.1E01 4.1E01
Breast 8.2E02 1.0E01 1.7E01 2.7E01 5.2E01
Gallbladder wall 3.5E01 3.9E01 5.4E01 8.5E01 1.6E+00
Gastrointestinal tract
Stomach wall 1.6E01 2.0E01 3.1E01 5.0E01 9.3E01
Small intestine wall 1.3E01 1.7E01 2.7E01 4.3E01 7.5E01
Colon wall 1.3E01 1.6E01 2.6E01 4.1E01 7.3E01
(Upper large intestine wall 1.5E01 1.8E01 3.0E01 4.9E01 8.8E01)
(Lower large intestine wall 1.0E01 1.3E01 2.0E01 3.1E01 5.4E01)
Heart wall 1.5E01 1.9E01 3.0E01 4.4E01 7.9E01
Kidneys 1.0E+00 1.2E+00 1.7E+00 2.5E+00 4.4E+00
Liver 2.4E+00 3.2E+00 4.9E+00 7.3E+00 1.4E+01
Lungs 1.4E01 1.8E01 2.6E01 3.9E01 7.2E01
Muscles 9.8E02 1.2E01 1.9E01 3.0E01 5.6E01
Oesophagus 8.8E02 1.1E01 1.7E01 2.6E01 4.9E01
Ovaries 1.1E01 1.4E01 2.2E01 3.4E01 6.1E01
Pancreas 2.7E01 3.3E01 5.1E01 7.8E01 1.3E+00
Red marrow 7.4E01 8.2E01 1.4E+00 2.7E+00 6.6E+00
Skin 6.8E02 8.5E02 1.4E01 2.2E01 4.3E01
Spleen 4.0E+00 5.8E+00 9.0E+00 1.4E+01 2.6E+01
Testes 6.4E02 8.3E02 1.4E01 2.2E01 4.1E01
Thymus 8.8E02 1.1E01 1.7E01 2.6E01 4.9E01
Thyroid 7.0E02 8.9E02 1.4E01 2.3E01 4.5E01
Urinary bladder wall 5.0E01 6.4E01 9.8E01 1.3E+00 1.8E+00
Uterus 1.1E01 1.4E01 2.2E01 3.5E01 6.1E01
Remaining organs 1.1E01 1.4E01 2.2E01 3.5E01 6.2E01
302
F(ab’)2 fragments
Adrenals 9.9E02 1.2E01 1.9E01 2.9E01 5.2E01
Bone surfaces 9.9E02 1.1E01 1.8E01 3.1E01 5.4E01
Brain 4.2E02 5.3E02 8.9E02 1.5E01 2.8E01
Breast 4.4E02 5.6E02 9.1E02 1.5E01 2.9E01
Gallbladder wall 1.0E01 1.2E01 1.8E01 2.8E01 4.9E01
Gastrointestinal tract
Stomach wall 7.1E02 8.7E02 1.4E01 2.2E01 4.0E01
Small intestine wall 6.9E02 8.7E02 1.4E01 2.2E01 4.0E01
Colon wall 6.7E02 8.4E02 1.4E01 2.1E01 3.8E01
(Upper large intestine wall 7.0E02 8.7E02 1.4E01 2.2E01 4.0E01)
(Lower large intestine wall 6.4E02 7.9E02 1.3E01 2.0E01 3.5E01)
Heart wall 6.3E02 8.1E02 1.3E01 2.0E01 3.7E01
Kidneys 1.4E+00 1.7E+00 2.4E+00 3.6E+00 6.4E+00
Liver 4.0E01 5.3E01 8.2E01 1.2E+00 2.3E+00
Lungs 5.8E02 7.5E02 1.2E01 1.8E01 3.5E01
Muscles 5.4E02 6.8E02 1.1E01 1.7E01 3.3E01
Oesophagus 5.0E02 6.4E02 1.0E01 1.6E01 3.1E01
Ovaries 6.6E02 8.4E02 1.3E01 2.1E01 3.7E01
Pancreas 9.7E02 1.2E01 1.9E01 2.9E01 5.0E01
Red marrow 1.3E01 1.5E01 2.4E01 4.5E01 1.0E+00
Skin 4.2E02 5.2E02 8.6E02 1.4E01 2.7E01
Spleen 7.3E01 1.1E+00 1.6E+00 2.6E+00 4.8E+00
Testes 5.0E02 6.4E02 1.1E01 1.6E01 3.1E01
Thymus 5.0E02 6.4E02 1.0E01 1.6E01 3.1E01
Thyroid 4.7E02 6.0E02 9.7E02 1.6E01 3.1E01
Urinary bladder wall 5.6E01 7.3E01 1.1E+00 1.5E+00 1.9E+00
Uterus 7.6E02 9.5E02 1.5E01 2.3E01 4.0E01
Remaining organs 5.8E02 7.5E02 1.2E01 2.0E01 3.7E01
303
F(ab’) fragments
Adrenals 7.1E02 9.1E02 1.4E01 2.3E01 4.1E01
Bone surfaces 5.1E02 6.2E02 9.7E02 1.5E01 3.0E01
Brain 3.7E02 4.7E02 7.9E02 1.3E01 2.5E01
Breast 3.6E02 4.6E02 7.4E02 1.2E01 2.4E01
Gallbladder wall 6.3E02 7.7E02 1.2E01 1.8E01 3.1E01
Gastrointestinal tract
Stomach wall 5.4E02 6.6E02 1.1E01 1.6E01 3.0E01
Small intestine wall 5.7E02 7.2E02 1.1E01 1.8E01 3.3E01
Colon wall 5.5E02 6.9E02 1.1E01 1.7E01 3.1E01
(Upper large intestine wall 5.5E02 6.9E02 1.1E01 1.7E01 3.1E01)
(Lower large intestine wall 5.6E02 6.9E02 1.1E01 1.7E01 3.0E01)
Heart wall 4.7E02 6.0E02 9.6E02 1.5E01 2.8E01
Kidneys 1.4E+00 1.7E+00 2.4E+00 3.6E+00 6.6E+00
Liver 8.7E02 1.1E01 1.7E01 2.6E01 4.7E01
Lungs 4.3E02 5.6E02 8.9E02 1.4E01 2.7E01
Muscles 4.5E02 5.7E02 9.1E02 1.4E01 2.8E01
Oesophagus 4.2E02 5.4E02 8.6E02 1.4E01 2.7E01
Ovaries 5.7E02 7.3E02 1.1E01 1.8E01 3.2E01
Pancreas 6.6E02 8.2E02 1.3E01 2.0E01 3.6E01
Red marrow 5.0E02 5.9E02 9.3E02 1.5E01 2.8E01
Skin 3.6E02 4.5E02 7.4E02 1.2E01 2.4E01
Spleen 1.6E01 2.2E01 3.4E01 5.3E01 9.6E01
Testes 4.5E02 5.9E02 9.6E02 1.5E01 2.8E01
Thymus 4.2E02 5.4E02 8.6E02 1.4E01 2.7E01
Thyroid 4.1E02 5.3E02 8.6E02 1.4E01 2.7E01
Urinary bladder wall 5.7E01 7.4E01 1.1E+00 1.5E+00 1.9E+00
Uterus 6.8E02 8.5E02 1.4E01 2.0E01 3.5E01
Remaining organs 4.6E02 5.8E02 9.3E02 1.5E01 2.8E01
304
127
C.58.2. References for Xe gas
Ackery, D.M., Goddard, B.A., 1975. Radiation doses from 133Xe and 127Xe used for lung
function investigations. In: Höfer, R. (Ed.), Radioaktive Isotope in Klinik und Forschung
11. Band. Urban und Schwarzenberg, Munich, pp. 31–43.
Atkins, H.L., Robertson, J.S., Croft, B.Y., et al., 1980. Estimates of radiation absorbed doses
from radioxenons in lung imaging. MIRD Dose Estimate Report No. 9. J. Nucl. Med. 21,
459–465.
Goddard, B.A., Ackery, D.J., 1975. Xenon-133, 127Xe and 125Xe used for lung function
investigations: a dosimetric comparison. J. Nucl. Med. 16, 780–786.
Susskind, H., Atkins, H.L., Cohn, S.H., Ellis, K.J., Richards, P., 1977. Whole body retention
of radioxenon. J. Nucl. Med. 18, 462–471.
305
127
Table C.122. Biokinetic data for Xe gas.
Single inhalation with 30-s breath hold or intravenous injection with 30-s breath hold
Lungs 0.98 0.0061 0.98 0.010
0.052 0.02
Remaining tissues 0.02 0.40 0.50 0.080
2.7 0.35
11 0.15
Rebreathing for 5 min
Lungs 0.86 0.0061 0.91 0.013
0.052 0.09
Remaining tissues 0.14 0.40 0.50 0.56
2.7 0.35
11 0.15
Rebreathing for 10 min
Lungs 0.77 0.0061 0.88 0.013
0.052 0.12
Remaining tissues 0.23 0.40 0.50 0.92
2.7 0.35
11 0.15
306
127
Table C.123. Absorbed doses for Xe gas.
307
308
309
133
C.59.2. References for Xe gas
Ackery, D.M., Goddard, B.A., 1975. Radiation doses from 133Xe and 127Xe used for lung
function investigations. In: Höfer, R. (Ed.), Radioaktive Isotope in Klinik und Forschung
11. Band. Urban und Schwarzenberg, Munich, pp. 31–43.
Atkins, H.L., Robertson, J.S., Croft, B.Y., et al., 1980. Estimates of radiation absorbed doses
from radioxenons in lung imaging. MIRD Dose Estimate Report No. 9. J. Nucl. Med. 21,
459–465.
Goddard, B.A., Ackery, D.J., 1975. Xenon-133, 127Xe and 125Xe used for lung function
investigations: a dosimetric comparison. J. Nucl. Med. 16, 780–786.
Susskind, H., Atkins, H.L., Cohn, S.H., Ellis, K.J., Richards, P., 1977. Whole body retention
of radioxenon. J. Nucl. Med. 18, 462–471.
310
133
Table C.124. Biokinetic data for Xe gas.
Single inhalation with 30-s breath hold or intravenous injection with 30-s breath hold
Lungs 0.98 0.0061 0.98 0.010
0.052 0.02
Remaining tissues 0.02 0.40 0.50 0.076
2.7 0.35
11 0.15
Rebreathing for 5 min
Lungs 0.86 0.0061 0.91 0.013
0.052 0.09
Remaining tissues 0.14 0.40 0.50 0.53
2.7 0.35
11 0.15
Rebreathing for 10 min
Lungs 0.77 0.0061 0.88 0.013
0.052 0.12
Remaining tissues 0.23 0.40 0.50 0.88
2.7 0.35
11 0.15
311
133
Table C.125. Absorbed doses for Xe gas.
312
313
314
(C181) Intravenously injected ionic monovalent thallium leaves the blood rapidly
by uptake into the cells of all organs and tissues. The distribution is largely deter-
mined by the magnitude of the regional blood flow, and is therefore dependent on the
degree of physical activity. Compared with the situation at rest, which is considered
in the present model, uptake in muscles increases two- to three-fold during exercise,
with a corresponding reduction in other tissues.
(C182) The organ uptake data in the model are based on the reports by Samson
et al. (1978), Atkins et al. (1977), and Chen et al. (1983). Bartlett et al. (1984) showed
that 80% of thallium is excreted via the gastrointestinal tract and 20% by the renal
tract. The whole-body retention curve can be represented by a bi-exponential func-
tion, with half-times of 7 days for 63% of the injected activity and 28 days for 37% of
the injected activity (Chen et al., 1983). It is assumed here that all organs and tissues
have similar retention kinetics, with the exception of the heart which shows more
rapid initial clearance (Freeman et al., 1986).
(C183) The uptake of thallium ions in the testes has been studied extensively.
Direct organ measurements at autopsy in two cases (Samson et al., 1978) showed
0.11–0.12%, while Hosain and Hosain (1981) and Gupta et al. (1981) derived values
of 0.8–1.0% from gamma camera images of the testicular–scrotal region. More
recent studies, however, have indicated lower uptake (Rao et al., 1995; Nettleton
et al., 2004; Thomas et al., 2005). Thomas et al. (2005) measured testicular uptake in
28 individuals using a collimation method, so that the testes were shielded from body
background with lead during imaging. However, activity in the scrotum could still
influence the measurements. Based on data from Thomas et al. (2005) and
Krahwinkel et al. (1988), uptake in the testes of 0.3% has been adopted.
201
C.60.2. References for Tl ion
Atkins, H.L., Budinger, T.F., Lebowitz, E., et al., 1977. Thallium-201 for medical use. Part 3.
Human distribution and physical imaging properties. J. Nucl. Med. 18, 133–140.
Bartlett, R.D., Lathrop, K.A., Faulhaber, P.F., Harper, P.V., 1984. Transfer of thallous ion to
and from gastrointestinal sections. J. Nucl. Med. 25, 92.
Chen, C.T., Lathrop, K.A., Harper, P.V., et al., 1983. Quantitative measurement of long term
in vivo thallium distribution in the human. J. Nucl. Med. 24, 50.
Freeman, M.R., Kanwar, N., Armstrong, P.W., 1986. The variability of thallium half life at
rest as compared to exercise. J. Nucl. Med. 27, 997.
Gupta, S.M., Herrera, N., Spencer, R.P., et al., 1981. Testicular-scrotal content of 201Tl and
67
Ga after intravenous administration. Int. J. Nucl. Med. Biol. 8, 211–213.
Hosain, P., Hosain, F., 1981. Revision of gonadal radiation dose to man from thallium-201. In:
Proceedings of the Third International Radiopharmaceutical Dosimetry Symposium, Oak
315
Ridge, TN, USA, October 7–10, 1980. (FDA 81-8166). U.S. Department of Health and
Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Washington, DC, USA, pp. 333–345.
Krahwinkel, W., Herzog, H., Feinendegen, L.E., 1988. Pharmacokinetics of thallium-201 in
normal individuals after routine myocardial scintigraphy. J. Nucl. Med. 29, 1582–1586.
Nettleton, J.S., Lawson, R.S., Prescott, M.C., Morris, I.D., 2004. Uptake, localization, and
dosimetry of 111In and 201Tl in human testes. J. Nucl. Med. 45, 138–146.
Rao, D.V., Shepstone, B.J., Wilkins, H.B., Howell, R.W., 1995. Kinetics and dosimetry of
thallium-201 in human testes. J. Nucl. Med. 36, 607–609.
Samson, G., Wackers, F.J.Th., Becker, A.E., et al., 1978. Distribution of thallium-201 in man.
In: Oeff, K., Schmidt, H.A.E. (Eds.), Nuklearmedizin und biokybernetik. Vol. 1. Medico-
informationsdienste, Berlin, pp. 385–389.
Thomas, S.R., Stabin, M.G., Castronovo, F.P., 2005. Radiation-absorbed dose from 201Tl-
thallous chloride. J. Nucl. Med. 46, 502–508.
316
201
Table C.126. Biokinetic data for Tl ion.
317
201
Table C.127. Absorbed doses for Tl ion.
318
319
320
321