General Ecology PDF

HANS ULRIK RIISGÅRD
GENERAL ECOLOGY
OUTLINE OF CONTEMPORARY
ECOLOGY FOR
UNIVERSITY STUDENTS
2
General Ecology: Outline of contemporary ecology for university students
2nd edition
© 2018 Hans Ulrik Riisgård & bookboon.com
ISBN 978-87-403-2201-9
Peer review by Tom Fenchel, PhD & DSc, Professor of Ecology, University of Copenhagen
Photo on front page is taken by the author and shows the invasive comb jelly, Mnemiopsis
leidyi, which lives naturally off the US East Coast, but via ballast water from ships, it found
its way to the Black Sea in the late 1980s, and to the Dutch coast in 2006.
3
GENERAL ECOLOGY Contents
CONTENTS
Preface 6
1 Ecology and ecosystems 7

1.1 Ecology and biosystems 7
1.2 Ecosystem concept 8
2 Energy flow in ecosystems 10

2.1 Solar radiation and global energy balance 10
2.2 Primary production and productivity 14
2.3 Food chains 15
2.4 Bioenergetics 17
2.5 Ecological efficiencies 22
2.6 Biomagnification of pollutants 25
�e Graduate Programme
I joined MITAS because for Engineers and Geoscientists
I wanted real responsibili� www.discovermitas.com
Maersk.com/Mitas �e G
I joined MITAS because for Engine
I wanted real responsibili� Ma
Month 16
I was a construction Mo
supervisor ina const
I was
the North Sea super
advising and the No
Real work he
helping foremen advis
International
al opportunities
Internationa
�ree wo
work
or placements ssolve problems
Real work he
helping fo
International
Internationaal opportunities
�ree wo
work
or placements ssolve pr
4
GENERAL ECOLOGY Contents
3 Biogeochemical cycles 27
3.1 Sedimentary and gaseous nutrient cycles 27
3.2 Carbon cycle 29
3.3 Nitrogen cycle 35
3.4 Sulphur cycle 40
3.5 Phosphorus cycle 44
3.6 Water cycle 46
4 Population ecology 47
4.1 Regulation of population density 47
4.2 Population growth and mathematical models 67
5 Species diversity 83
5.1 Transition zones and edge effects 90
5.2 Island biogeography 91
6 Ecological succession 95
6.1 Autogenous succession 96
6.2 K and r-strategists 101
6.3 Allogeneic succession 102
6.4 Climax ecosystems 103
6.5 Succession in “space” 103
6.6 The biosphere as an ecosystem 105
6.7 Ecosystem complexity and stability 105
6.8 Ecosystem models and limits to growth 107
7 Marine ecosystems 109

7.1 Open seas 110
7.2 Marine shallow water areas 118
8 Lake ecosystems 119

8.1 Temperature stratification in lakes 120
8.2 Seasonal variations in lakes 124
9 Forest ecosystems 129

9.1 Food chains in forests 133
9.2 Humus and nutrient balance 137
References 138
Index 145
5
GENERAL ECOLOGY Preface
PREFACE
This book is written to meet the need for a concise textbook of ecology. The book describes
the basic features of the modern ecology and is addressed to college students without special
biological knowledge. The book can be used in high schools, technical colleges and other
places of study where ecology forms part of the education, but where time does not permit
a major review of the many ecological topics. This ecology book does not deal with ‘species
ecology’ or autecology, i.e. single species relation to their surroundings, although these factors
may be of importance for the understanding of many ecological conditions. The book
deals not particularly with pollution and environmental problems, which in many people’s
consciousness is almost synonymous with ecology, but touches on many such topics and
provides the foundation for a basic understanding of many of today’s urgent environmental
problems. For the sake of clarity, the number of references to textbooks, original articles,
etc. is kept to a minimum, and for reasons of space references are indicated by a number
in parentheses [ ] corresponding to reference number in the reference list.
Thanks are due to Tom Fenchel, Professor of Ecology, University of Copenhagen, for
constructive criticism of the manuscript, and to Kirstin Anderson Hansen and Josephine
Goldstein for linguistic corrections and technical assistance, respectively. Thanks to Prof. em.
Klaus H. Hoffmann, University of Bayreuth, for corrections on 1st edition of the book.
Hans Ulrik Riisgård

Professor, PhD & DSc
Department of Biology
University of Southern Denmark
6
GENERAL ECOLOGY Ecology and ecosystems
1 ECOLOGY AND ECOSYSTEMS

The word ecology is derived from the Greek word “oikos” meaning house, combined with
“logy” meaning the learning of ecology and can therefore be translated to “the learning of
nature’s household”, though the word ecology is not of ancient Greek origin. The term ecology
was first used in 1869 by the German biologist Ernst Haeckel. The concept of ecology only
slowly increased, and well into the 20th century it was still almost unknown outside the
group of professional biologists. It was especially botanists, who first used the word ecology
but later also by zoologists. It has been much debated how ecology should be defined and
distinguished from related fields. Ecology has previously been defined as “the study of the
distribution and amount of organisms in an area. This definition of ecology, which some
people still use, is different from the one most commonly use today. In the following, there
is first given a definition of the modern ecology succeeded by a brief description of what
is meant by an ecosystem.
1.1 ECOLOGY AND BIOSYSTEMS

It has become customary to define ecology as “the science of biological systems above the
organism level”. This definition and delimitation of modern ecology is illustrated in Fig. 1,
showing the different levels of organization (cell, organ, individual, population, community)
and how these living (biotic) components interacts with the non-living (abiotic) components
(matter and energy).
ecology
living cells organs organisms populations community

components
non-living
matter & energy
components
cell-
biosystems ecosystem
system
Fig. 1. Living components in interaction with the non-living (abiotic) components are called biosystems.
Ecology is defined as the science of biological systems (biosystems) above the organism level [1].
7
The living and the nonliving components are together called for biosystems. The highest level
of organization is the community, which consists of all animals, plants and microorganisms
in a given area. A community that functions together with the abiotic components of a
biosystem is called an ecological system or ecosystem. When moving from a biosystem to
another at a higher level of organisation, characteristic properties emerge that were not
present on the lower level of organization. This phenomenon is known as the “integrative
level concept” or the “hierarchical control principle”, which says that when biotic and
abiotic components are integrated to form larger functional units in a hierarchical (ranked)
series, new properties emerge [1]. Thus, when moving from organism systems to population
systems and further to ecosystems, new characteristic properties are developed which were
not present at the previous level of organization. By recognizing the specific characteristics
of a given organization, can this level can be studied without necessarily knowing everything
about the neighbouring organisation levels. For example it is possible to study ecology at
the ecosystem level without first studying cell biology and physiology. But how do you
study a large complicated ecosystem? As with the study of any other level of organization,
you begin with a description of simplified models that contains only the main components
and basic functions of the biosystem in question.
1.2 ECOSYSTEM CONCEPT

An ideal ecosystem is a closed – but not isolated – biosystem with all of its biotic and
abiotic components flowing through with energy. You can imagine an ideal ecosystem as
an illuminated aquarium, see Fig. 2.
RADIATION ENERGY
zooplankton
plankton algae
inorganic
nutrients
NUTRIENT
HEAT
CYCLES
bacteria and fungi
Fig. 2. Simplified model of an aquatic ecosystem. An ecosystem has a number of

characteristics: 1) cyclic transformation of the chemical components, 2) a flow of energy
through the system, 3) the energy flow rate determines the transformation speed of
the substances.
8
In the aquarium there are living organisms: primary producers (phytoplankton), consumers
(zooplankton, fish), decomposers (including bacteria and fungi) and abiotic components
(water, oxygen, carbon dioxide, phosphate, nitrogen compounds, dead organic matter
etc.). Primary producers (plankton algae) synthesise organic matter, using light energy and
inorganic nutrients. Plankton algae are “grazed” by filter-feeding zooplankton (copepods,
daphnia, etc.), which in turn are eaten by fish. Dead algae, animals and faeces, which sink
to the bottom, are degraded by bacteria and other organisms, releasing inorganic nutrients
that primary producers can exploit. The biological activity of the ecosystem gives rise to a
production of heat that is leaving the system by radiation. The system’s chemical components
remain on the other hand, in the system and are cyclically transformed. The velocity of this
substance’s transformation is determined by the flow of energy through the system. If the
system is isolated so that it does not receive energy and no energy can leave, the cycling will
stop and the structure of the ecosystem will disintegrate. An example of an ideal ecosystem
is the biosphere, which consists of the entire Earth’s surface containing life. Most natural
ecosystems are, to a greater or lesser extent different from the ideal, depending on the
mass and energy exchange with neighbouring ecosystems. Fairly well-defined ecosystems
are lakes, forests, fjords, the sea – or a rotten tree stump in a forest, if you are interested
in the turnover and interaction between microorganisms and the small animals that live
here. The limits of an ecosystem are arbitrary and in practice, determined by an ecologist’s
choice of working objective.
9
GENERAL ECOLOGY Energy flow in ecosystems
2 ENERGY FLOW IN ECOSYSTEMS

The biosphere is dependent on solar energy that reaches the earth’s surface as solar radiation.
This chapter explains how sunlight reaches the Earth’s surface and how the plants here utilize
sunlight for new production (primary production) of organic matter that form the basis of
energy for the ecosystem food chains.
2.1 SOLAR RADIATION AND GLOBAL ENERGY BALANCE

Solar radiation consists of electromagnetic waves which are created when hydrogen nuclei
in the sun fusion at very high temperatures. The sunbeam spectrum is very wide, but
almost all the radiation energy is in the visible light between the ultraviolet and the infrared
spectrum, see Fig. 3.
Spectral distribution of sunlight

outside the atmosphere
0.003 O3
O2
Radiation intensity, cal/cm2/min/μm
H2O
CO2
0.002
Spectral distribution of sunlight
at the surface of the sea
0.001
0.000
0 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6 2.0 2.4 2.8 3.2
Wavelength, μm
Orange
Yellow
Green
Violet
Blue
{ Red
uv visible light infrared
Fig. 3. The spectral distribution of the sun’s electromagnetic radiation is altered by passage
through the Earth’s atmosphere: almost all the deadly ultraviolet radiation (UV) is absorbed by
ozone (O3) in the stratosphere, while carbon dioxide (CO2) and water vapour (H2O) absorb a
very significant part of the infrared radiation. The figure shows the spectral distribution of the
solar radiation outside the atmosphere and at sea level. Shadings indicate some of the most
important gases’ selective absorption of certain wavelengths [3].
10
When sun’s radiation passes through the atmosphere, the radiation spectrum changes
considerably. At 10–50 km altitude (the stratosphere) there is an ozone layer, which absorbs
almost all the ultraviolet (UV) radiation that would otherwise have a killing effect on life
on land. Ultraviolet radiation has sufficient energy to break down important biological
molecules and can therefore, even in minor amounts damage crops and cause skin cancer.
Ozone (O3) is formed when oxygen (O2) by absorption of ultraviolet light is split to the
two reactive oxygen atoms (O) that soon react with intact oxygen molecules to form
ozone. Ozone is a gas, which readily absorb UV light and split (dissociate) into O2 and O.
The released oxygen atom can now react with another oxygen molecule whereby ozone is
regenerated. This process of splitting and regeneration can take place many times until the
ozone molecule eventually collides with a free-oxygen atom, thereby forming two stable
oxygen molecules. Under constant conditions, the result is a dynamic equilibrium in which
the formation and degradation rates of ozone are equal. It is this balance that determines
the thickness of the ozone layer.
In 1985, British scientists reported that the concentration of ozone in the atmosphere over
Antarctica in the spring was reduced by 40% in the years from1977 to 1984 (“ozone hole”).
Intense research quickly revealed that ozone depletion, which was also later detected in the
northern hemisphere, was due to man-made chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs or “freon”), used for
example in cooling liquids in refrigerators and propellants in aerosol spray cans and additives
in plastic foam. The large amounts of CFCs, which over the years had been released to the
atmosphere, in conjunction with long atmospheric lifetimes (up to several hundred years)
for many CFC gases, puts the problem of ozone depletion into perspective. CFCs have
been considered as ideal chemicals for industrial use because they are stable, unreactive and
non-toxic. But when CFCs. by upward air streams are brought into the stratosphere, they
are broken down by the strong ultraviolet radiation and release chlorine atoms that break
down the ozone layer. CFCs have given mankind a persistent environmental problem that
even extensive international agreements is difficult to reduce, over a long period of time.
But there is reason for optimism. The Montreal Protocol is an international agreement to
protect the ozone layer around the Earth by phasing out the production of CFCs. The
historic agreement entered into force in 1989 and is one of the most successful international
agreements to date. This phasing out of CFCs has in 2015, resulted in the first observation
of an incipient reduction in the size of the Antarctic ozone hole [2].
11
In addition to ozone, oxygen, water vapour and carbon dioxide can also selectively absorb
radiation at certain wavelengths [3]. Thus, carbon dioxide and water vapour absorb a large
part of the incoming infrared radiation. The main part of the solar radiation that reaches
the Earth’s surface, is in the visible spectrum between 0.4–0.8 µm, see Fig. 3. It is this
part of the spectrum (especially the red and blue light) that the green plants can utilize
for photosynthesis. On average, the Earth emits a similar amount of radiation energy into
space as the atmosphere and Earth’s surface absorb incoming solar radiation, see Fig. 4. This
energy balance determines the global average temperature, which is approximately 15 °C [4].
www.job.oticon.dk
12
incoming
outgoing infrared
sunlight
thermal radiation
reflected reflected sunlight
sunlight from from surface
the atmosphere of the earth
25 100 6 69
absorbed by
H2O, dust, atmosphere
O3, CO2 42
43
1 % absorbed Earth’s surface

by plants
absorbed sunlight
Fig. 4. The global energy balance. The energy of the incoming

solar radiation is set at 100. Note that the fraction of the incoming
short-wave solar radiation that is not reflected, leaves the
biosphere as infrared heat radiation [4].
About 30% of the incoming solar radiation is reflected to space by clouds, dust particles
and gases in the atmosphere, or snow, desert sand, etc. at ground level. The part of the
incoming solar radiation reflected to space (the Earth albedo) increases if dust and soot
particle concentration in the atmosphere increases (which can be caused by pollution,
volcanic eruptions, and nuclear explosions). This could lead to shorter or prolonged decline
in global average temperature. The part of the sun’s shortwave radiation energy that is
absorbed in and at ground level (40–45%) is emitted again from the ground as longwave
infrared radiation (“heat radiation”). Most of this radiation is absorbed and re-emitted
repeatedly by atmospheric water vapour, carbon dioxide, dust and ozone before it reaches
out into space. This warms up the atmosphere, and the effect is called “greenhouse-effect”
because the atmosphere – like glass in a greenhouse – is readily permeable to the short
wavelength solar radiation but relatively impermeable to longwave infrared radiation. Only
about 1% of the incoming solar radiation is used by the green plants for photosynthesis.
The remainder of the solar energy is absorbed mainly in the earth’s surface where it is
converted (transformed) into heat energy, which in turn is emitted to the atmosphere as
infrared heat radiation. This energy is not lost because the heat radiation makes the Earth
habitable for living organisms by e.g. heating up the atmosphere, creating winds, clouds
and precipitation, which is essential for life on land [5].
13
2.2 PRIMARY PRODUCTION AND PRODUCTIVITY

The fraction of light energy that is absorbed by the green plants is by photosynthesis converted
to chemically bound energy in the produced organic matter. The photosynthesis process
takes place in the chloroplasts of the plants and can be described by the following reaction:
CO2 + 2H2O* → (CH2O) + O2* + H2O

or
nCO2 + 2nH2O* → (CnH2nOn) + nO2* + nH2O
for example
6CO2 + 12H2O* → (C6H12O6) + 6O2* + 6H2O
where * indicates that the formed oxygen derives from the water; the example shows the
formation of glucose.
By means of photosynthesis, land plants take up atmospheric CO2 which is incorporated

into simple carbohydrates (CH2O) during concurrent production of O2 being released to the
surroundings. The produced carbohydrates (sugars) are used partly as energy suppliers for the
plants’ own metabolism (respiration), whereby the organic matter is oxidized to CO2 and
H2O during release of energy, and partly as suppliers of energy for production of new cells
and for storage. The total amount of organic matter produced by photosynthesis is called
gross primary production, while the share of production that is left when the metabolism
is covered is called net primary production, see Fig. 5.
Sunlight
100% 2% Net
1%
Absorbed Gross production
Reflected light production
light
1%
98% Respiration
Heat
Fig. 5. The flow of energy through a land plant. Approximately 2% of

the absorbed light energy goes to gross primary production, half of
which goes back to the plant’s own metabolism (respiration). In nature,
the net primary production is about half as large as the gross primary
production – which means that to about 1% of the absorbed light energy
is bound as chemical energy in organic matter that can be exploited by
the primary consumers in the grazing food chain or the decomposers
in the detritus food chain.
14
About 50% of the sunlight that hits a plant is absorbed. Approximately 2% of this absorbed
light is used for gross primary production. In nature, plants use around 50% of the gross
primary production for their own metabolism (respiration). However, by using energy-
consuming work, the consumption for metabolism may be reduced (by supplying essential
trace elements, nutrients, water, or by removing competing plants), making it possible to
strongly reduce the plants’ own energy needs. In agriculture, it is not uncommon that the
net production is up to 90% of the gross production.
2.3 FOOD CHAINS

The transfer of energy from plants to animals is done through a number of links called
a food chain. Organisms located at the same step in relation to the food source are said
to be on the same trophic level. The trophic classification is based on function – not on
species that often can be placed on multiple trophic levels depending on the food choices.
DEDICATED TEACHERS,
WORLD-CLASS
RESEARCH,
CLOSE INDUSTRY
CONNECTIONS.
English-taught MSc programmes
in Computer science and
Computational social science.
No tuition fees.
E liu.se/master
‡
15
The living organisms in an ecosystem can according to their function and place in the
system, be divided into four main groups:
1) Primary producers – autotrophic (green plants convert solar energy into chemical
energy bound in organic matter using photosynthesis.
2) Herbivores (lat.: herba = herb, vorare = swallow) – plant eaters or “grazers”; are
also called the primary consumers.
3) Carnivores (lat.: carnis = meat) – predators. Since some predators feed on herbivores,
while others feed on other predators (carnivores), we distinguish between primary
carnivores that eat herbivorous animals, and secondary, tertiary etc. carnivores that
eat other predators. Depending on their position relative to the primary consumers,
carnivores are also called secondary, tertiary, etc. consumers. Because the herbivores’
and carnivores’ energy ultimately comes from the autotrophic organisms’ primary
production, they are also called secondary producers.
4) Decomposers or detritivores (fungi, bacteria, etc.) that can utilise the energy of
dead organic material (detritus).
There are two types of food chains, “grazing food chains” and “detritus food chains”. The
two types of food chains are shown in Fig. 6. The grazing food chain consists of primary
producers, herbivores and carnivores. The detritus food chain consists of detritivores that
feed on dead organic matter from the grazing food chain, and the animals that live in part
of the detritivore organisms as well as of other animals. In the detritus food chain, it is
impossible to distinguish clearly between the trophic levels because there are no well-defined
food chains but complicated food webs.
Heat radiation
Solar radiation
Grazing Primary Primary Secondary

Herbivores
food chain: producers carnivores carnivores
Dead organic material (detritus)
Detritus Decomposers
food chain:
Predators
Fig. 6. As the organic matter produced by the primary producers is transported through the
grazing and detritus food chains (solid arrows), it is burned off in the organisms by their metabolism,
releasing energy that leaves the ecosystem as heat radiation
16
2.4 BIOENERGETICS
Bioenergetics is concerned with examining how the living organisms absorbs food, digests and
distributes consumed or synthesized substance and energy for maintenance (metabolism =
respiration) and production (new cells, storage, reproduction). The flow of energy through
a population can be determined from knowledge of the individual organism’s bioenergetics,
with extrapolation from a single organism to all the organisms in a population. It is therefore
often interesting to know how effective a given organism utilizes a given quantity of food
for production because such knowledge can provide information on how much food energy
that is available to the next link in the food chain. To calculate the efficiency of dietary
utilization of an organism you need to know the organism’s energy budget [6]. In Fig. 7
it is shown the fate of food energy in an animal consumer (e.g. a mammal or fish). It is
noted that the amount of energy production (P) can be expressed as the difference between
energy in assimilated food (A = I – F, where I = energy in ingested food, and F = energy
in faeces, urine etc.) and respiration (R):
P = I – F – R = A – R (I)
ENERGY OF FOOD: I
ENERGY IN FAECES ENERGY IN ABSORBED FOOD

F
ENERGY IN EXCRETION
PRODUCTS (URINE etc.)
ENERGY IN ASSIMILATED FOOD: A
DIGESTION PROCESSES,
DEAMINATION,
COSTS OF GROWTH, etc.
(SDA = SPECIFIC DYNAMIC ACTION)
RESPIRATION: R
STANDARD METABOLIC RATE
(OSMOTIC, CHEMICAL AND ELECTRICAL
WORK, etc.)
MUSCLE ACTIVITY
ENERGY FOR PRODUCTION

(NEW CELLS, STORAGE,
REPRODUCTION): P
ENERGY EQUATION FOR AN INDIVIDUAL ANIMAL

P=I-F-R=A-R
Fig. 7. The fate of food energy an animal, e.g. a mammal or a fish. It is seen that the amount
of energy available for growth can be expressed as the assimilated food energy minus the
energy consumption for the metabolism (often measured as the organism’s oxygen
consumption = respiration). It appears that the metabolism covers many ill-defined energy
items which cannot be measured or are difficult to measure separately [6].
17
In Fig. 8 is shown a universal model of the energy flow through an organism or through
a population [1].
P
I A
Fig. 8. Universal model of energy flow through an organism, a

population, or through a trophic level. I = energy content of food
consumed, F = energy content of faeces, urine and other
excretory products, A = assimilated food energy, R = metabolism
(respiration), P = energy to production, B = biomass.
INNOVATIVE
LIKE YOU.
If you’re hoping for a truly modern education, one where you’re
encouraged to speak your mind and to think long-term, both when
it comes to your own future and the future of the planet. Then the
University of Gothenburg is the place for you.
Study a Master’s programme in Gothenburg, Sweden | www.gu.se/education
18
A parameter of great ecological interest is the assimilation efficiency (AE), defined as:
AE = A/I (II)
where A = I – F or A = P + R.
The assimilation efficiency varies widely among different organisms depending on type of
food. The assimilation efficiency of predators is often close to 100%, while the herbivores
and detrivores have lower efficiencies (often less than 10%). Another efficiency of ecological
interest is the net growth efficiency (NGE), which expresses how much of the assimilated
food energy (A) that can be used for production:
NGE = P/A (III)
If a blue mussel, for example, has a net growth efficiency of 67% this means that 2/3 of the
assimilated food energy can be used for production of animal material, which is available
to the next link in the food chain.
The production of a population is the amount of energy stored as organic matter per unit
of time, regardless whether this substance is lost for the population along the way due to
death, lost skin cells etc. A population may therefore have a production even if you cannot
detect any differences in population weight (biomass). The production of natural populations
can be determined using various methods. Three methods are mentioned in the following:
1) An often used method is based on determination of the population’s energy budget.

With knowledge of the parameters of the energy equation for individuals belonging
to the different size classes of the population you can, when the population size and
age structure is known, determine production of the population as the difference
between the total amounts of food assimilated by the population and the total
respiration of the population.
2) The production of a population can be determined from knowledge of the individual
growth curve and with regular determination of the size and age structure of the
population. A particularly simple situation exists when one wishes to determine the
production of a population comprising a single generation (e.g. annual insects) or
a single brood. To determine the production of such a population a survival curve
is required. This is determined by counting the population at various times (t) and
an individual growth curve, see Fig. 9.
19
NW
Growth
No
Nn
∆Nn N n+1
Survival
W n+1
∆Wn
Wn
Wo
n n+1 a t
Fig. 9. Based on knowledge of the individual growth-curve and survival-

curve for a population of one litter or a single generation (e.g. annual
insects), it is possible to calculate the production of the population
over a given period of time. Explanation of all terms, see the text.
If ∆Nn is the number of individuals that have died in the period tn – tn+1 and ΔWn is the
individual growth during the same period, the production of the dead individuals in this
period approximately = (ΔNn × ΔWn)/2, as individuals on average die midway through the
period. The production of the surviving individuals is = Nn+1 × ΔWn. The whole production
(Pn) in the period tn – tn+1 then becomes: Pn = Nn+1 × ΔWn + (ΔNn × ΔWn)/2, and the entire
population production (P) is determined as:
where a is the maximum life expectancy.
3) If the biomass of a population is called B and the biomass eliminated from the
population in a given period is denoted E, then during this time there has been a
production P = ΔB + E, as illustrated in Fig. 10.
20
i=4
E= Ei
i=1
Biomass: B P
E2
∆B
E4
E3
E1
Fig. 10. The production of a population (P) can be determined by

summing the changes in biomass (ΔB) and the total biomass eliminated
(E) over a given period of time (t). The eliminated biomass may
represent dead individuals, casted skin, etc., and can be found by
determining the biomass of the population at appropriately frequent
time intervals, so that any decrease in biomass (E1, E2, E3 … Ei) is
recorded resulting in the sum of these being equal to E.

678'<)25<2850$67(5©6'(*5((
&KDOPHUV8QLYHUVLW\RI7HFKQRORJ\FRQGXFWVUHVHDUFKDQGHGXFDWLRQLQHQJLQHHU
LQJDQGQDWXUDOVFLHQFHVDUFKLWHFWXUHWHFKQRORJ\UHODWHGPDWKHPDWLFDOVFLHQFHV
DQGQDXWLFDOVFLHQFHV%HKLQGDOOWKDW&KDOPHUVDFFRPSOLVKHVWKHDLPSHUVLVWV
IRUFRQWULEXWLQJWRDVXVWDLQDEOHIXWXUH¤ERWKQDWLRQDOO\DQGJOREDOO\
9LVLWXVRQ&KDOPHUVVHRU1H[W6WRS&KDOPHUVRQIDFHERRN
21
2.5 ECOLOGICAL EFFICIENCIES

Figure 11 shows with realistic figures the flow of energy through three trophic levels in
a theoretical grazing food chain. The simplified diagram shows how energy (as heat and
detritus) is lost in and between each link in the food chain. The relationships between
energy flows both within and between trophic levels have significant ecological interest.
Such relationships are called “ecological efficiencies” and are expressed as percentages. Table
1 lists and defines some of the most frequently used ecological efficiencies. Experience shows
that the various efficiencies are often confused with misunderstandings as a result. There
is no agreed standard use of symbols; but the notation used in Fig. 11 is frequently seen.
Primary producers Herbivores Carnivores
D F
Lt
D F
Pg Pn I A
La P2 P3
Reflec- Heat R R R
3000 1500 15 1.5 0.3

Lt La Pn P2 P3
kcal/m2/day
Fig. 11. The flow of energy through three trophic levels in a theoretical grazing food chain consisting
of primary producers, herbivores and carnivores. Lt = total light energy La = absorbed light energy,
Pg = gross primary production, Pn = net primary production, R = respiration, I = ingested food
energy, A = assimilated food energy, F = not assimilated food energy (faeces, urine, etc.), D =
detritus, P2 and P3 = secondary and tertiary production [1].
The more simple notation used in Fig. 12, which does not pay special regard to the primary
producers, provides a quick overview and facilitate the definition of the ecological efficiencies
in Table 1. As shown, it is important to accurately define the relationship that should be
expressed when using ecological efficiencies. The trophic level production efficiencies in Fig.
11 is thus in the order of 10% (P2/P1 = P2/Pn = 1.5/15 = 0.1) for the second, and about
20% (P3/P2 = 0.3/1.5 = 0.2) for the third food chain link. As can be seen, it is limited
how many links there can be in a food chain. In practice, food chains have rarely more
than 3–4 links.
22
R1 R2 R3
I1 P1 I2 P2 I3 P3
A1 A2 A3
D1 D2 D3
F1 F2
Fig. 12. Linear grazing food chain consisting of three trophic levels: 1: primary producers
(plants), 2: herbivores, 3: carnivores. I: consumed energy; A: assimilated energy; R: respiration;
P: production; D: loss from the food chain (detritus); F: not assimilated food energy (faeces,
urine, etc.). Both D and F supply the decomposers (i.e. the detritus food chain).
Relationship between trophic levels:
It/It-1: efficiency of trophic level energy intake
At/At-1: trophic level assimilation efficiency
Pt/ Pt-1: trophic level production efficiency
It/Pt-1: utilization efficiency
Relationships within trophic levels:
Pt/At: production efficiency
Pt/It: ecological growth efficiency
At/It: assimilation efficiency
Tabel 1. Definitions of ecological efficiencies for relationships between and within trophic
levels. For explanation of symbols used, see Fig. 12.
Figure 13 shows a natural ecosystem, namely the Silver Springs which is a popular tourist
attraction in Florida. It is seen that the primary producers’ ecological net-production-efficiency
is 2% (P1/ I1 = Pn/La = 8833 /410,000 = 0.02). The herbivores’ trophic level assimilation
efficiency is 16%. (A2/A1 = A2/Pb = 3,368/20,810 = 0.16), whereas the primary carnivores’
trophic level assimilation efficiency is 11% (383/3,368 = 0.11). Moreover, the majority of
the primary production goes through the detritus food chain, and that (4.600/5.060)×100
= 91% of this energy is released from the ecosystem as heat. A large export relative to the
import (mostly bread that tourists throw out to the fish) shows that the ecosystem produces
more organic material than it uses for respiration. Such an ecosystem in which the production
(P) is greater than the respiration (R) is called an autotrophic ecosystem.
23
Import
406
383 5,060 460
Total incoming 1,478

light D
3,368
1,700,000
67 6
La
410,000 Pg =20,810
P2 P3 P4
Pn
8,833
R
0
1,89
2,500
6
31
11,977 Export
Light not
13
absorbed by 389,190 4,600
plants
1,290,000
18,796
Heat
Fig. 13. The flow of energy through an aquatic ecosystem, “Silver Springs”, Florida. La =
absorbed light energy, Pg = gross primary production, Pn = net primary production, R =
respiration, P2 = herbivores, P3 = primary carnivores, P4 = secondary carnivores, D =
detrivores (“decomposers”). It is noted that the largest part of net primary production
goes through the detritus food chain [1, 7]. All figures are in kcal/m2/year.
Striking a match, reconnecting with your family through Skype or over a phone network from Ericsson, refurnishing your
apartment at IKEA or driving safely in your Volvo - none of this would be possible if not for Sweden.
Swedish universities offer over 900 international master’s programmes taught entirely in English.
Don’t just pick a place - pick a future.

>studyinsweden.se
24
An ecosystem where P is less than R is called heterotrophic. An often used graphical way
to show how the chemically bound energy in a grazing food chain decreases is to build an
“energy pyramid” where the width of each step of the pyramid, which represents a trophic
level, is a measure of the assimilated energy in the organisms belonging to that trophic
level, see Fig. 14.
Top predators NP=6

R=13
NP=67
Primary carnivores
R=316
Herbivores R NP R
Producers 945 1,478 945
Respiration (R) Net production (NP) Respiration (R)

5,988 8,833 5,988
Fig. 14. Energy pyramid, based on data from the grazing food chain in “Silver Springs”, see fig. 13.
The energy pyramid shows how the assimilated energy is used for respiration (R) and net primary
production (NP) at each trophic level [7].
2.6 BIOMAGNIFICATION OF POLLUTANTS

Chemical substances (pollutants) that are difficult to decompose (persistent) and at the same
time fat-soluble, tend to accumulate (biomagnify) in the food chains because these substances
may effectively be transferred from link to link in the food chain. At the same time there
is combustion of biomass which becomes smaller and smaller, while the concentration of
pollutants become correspondingly higher in each link of the food chain. The insect poison
DDT, now banned in most industrialized countries, is an example of a substance that can
be biomagnified and thereby cause damage in the higher links of food chains. DDT and its
breakdown products are believed to be primarily responsible for the observation that since
1945, North American and English peregrines as well as Swedish ospreys have laid eggs
with thinner shells [8, 9]. For a time the population of these predatory birds in Sweden
was directly threatened, because the thin-shelled eggs broke during incubation. Since the
use of DDT was banned in Sweden and neighboring countries in the 1960s, eggshells have
become thicker and the population of ospreys is now re-establishing itself. Another example
of a substance that can biomagnify is the insecticide DDD, which was much used in the
U.S.A. after World War II, to eradicate mosquito larvae in Clear Lake near San Francisco.
Deaths among fish-eating birds in 1957 led to investigations, which showed that DDD was
biomagnified in the lake’s food chains. The concentration compared to the lake water was
265 times in the plankton, 500 times in small fish, 85,000 times in carnivorous fish, and
80–125,000 times in fish-eating birds [9].
25
Monomethyl mercury (CH3Hg+) can be mentioned as a final example of a chemical substance

that is biomagnified. Severe cases of polluting of lakes and rivers with mercury in Sweden
in the late 1950s, and the deaths of several hundred people in Japan in the mid-1960s, as
well as an extensive mercury pollution of the waters around Harboøre Tange in Denmark,
caused by a chemical factory [10] has led to intensified research in the ecotoxicology of
mercury (dispersion, circulation and biological effects in nature). Thus it was discovered
that phenylmercuric acetate, earlier used to control fungi in the wood-pulp industry and
for staining seed, can be converted by microorganisms to monomethyl mercury which in
contrast to inorganic mercury (Hg++), is fat-soluble, highly toxic, and persistent. These
properties make monomethyl mercury able to biomagnify in food chains. It must be added
that the “classical” description of biomagnification of monomethyl mercury seems to be
too simplified because the effectiveness of the degree to which this mercury compound
is transferred from link to link in the food chain, is also very much determined by the
physiology of the different organisms and their capabilities to detoxify and excrete the toxic
substance [11]. Thus, there are major physiological differences (blood circulation, liver and
kidney function, etc.) between filter-feeders (mussels, zooplankton) and fish that constitute
the important part of aquatic “grazing food chains”. Biomagnification of monomethyl
mercury cannot be exclusively assumed to be a simple consequence of the ability of the
substance to be “burned in the energy pyramid”.
Develop the tools we need for Life Science

Masters Degree in Bioinformatics
Bioinformatics is the
exciting ﬁeld where biology,
computer science, and
mathematics meet.
We solve problems from

biology and medicine using
methods and tools from
computer science and
mathematics.
Read more about this and our other international masters degree programmes at www.uu.se/master
26
GENERAL ECOLOGY Biogeochemical cycles
3 BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLES
All nutrients have their own characteristic biogeochemical cycle. This chapter deals with
macro- and micronutrients, as well as short reviews of four major biogeochemical cycles
are given.
3.1 SEDIMENTARY AND GASEOUS NUTRIENT CYCLES

In the biological evolution, only certain elements have been used as the atomic building
blocks in the living cell. Of the 92 naturally occurring elements, it is now believed that
only about 24 are involved in the life processes. The molecular building blocks of the cell,
namely proteins, carbohydrates and fats are made up of six relatively light elements: C, H,
N, O, P and S.
Five elements, which are also in the light-weight end of the periodic table, help to maintain
electroneutrality in body fluids or are used to maintain the electrochemical potential gradients
across the cell membrane. The latter is important, for example the impulse conductivity
of nerve cells, and for the ability of cells to maintain a constant volume. The elements,
which are all found on ion form are: Na, K, Ca, Mg and Cl. A third group of elements,
the essential trace elements (Zn, Cu, Co, Mn, Fe, Mo) are only found in the body in very
small quantities. These trace elements are necessary for particular the function of many
enzymes. All these elements are called nutrients because they are vital (essential) for the
living organism. Substances, which are required in large quantity, are called macronutrients
(C, H, N, O, P, S, Na, K, Ca, Mg, Cl), while the elements required in small quantities
are called micronutrients (especially Zn, Cu, Co, Mn, Fe, Mo, but also Va, In, Se, Si, F,
Ba are necessary in some species). All micro- and macronutrients are circulated between
the living organisms and the surrounding abiotic environment. Such cycles of nutrients
are called biogeochemical cycles. Fig. 15 shows a biogeochemical cycling incorporated in a
simple energy flow diagram. This is to show the interaction between energy and material
cycling. Energy is required to drive a nutrient cycle.
27
Import Reservoir
Export
Light
Pg Pn P
Heat
R R
Fig. 15. Biogeochemical cycle built into a simple energy-flow

diagram. The circulating material is represented by a circle extending
from the primary producers to the consumers and back again. The
large reservoir of non-biologically bound substances is shown by a
rectangle. Pg = gross primary production, Pn = net primary production,
P = heterotrophic production, R = respiration, F = not assimilated
food energy. Hatched = biomass [1].
It is convenient to distinguish between a large, slow moving non-biological pool and a

smaller but more active pool of substances that are exchanged quickly between organisms
and the environment. Fig. 15 demonstrates the circulating material represented by a circle
extending from the primary producers to the consumers and back again. The large reservoir
of non-biologically bound substances is shown by a rectangle. All micro- and macronutrients
have their own distinctive cycles, which are divided into two main types:
1) Sedimentary types of cycles where the largest reservoir is found in sediments

(e.g. S, P, Ca).
2) Gaseous types of cycles in which the atmosphere is the largest reservoir
(e.g. N, C, O).
In the following sections, an outline of some important biogeochemical cycles is given.
28
3.2 CARBON CYCLE

The carbon compounds in the biosphere are all the time being formed, transformed and
decomposed, see Fig. 16 [12, 13]. This dynamic state is maintained by the autotrophic and
heterotrophic organisms. The autotrophic organisms (i. e. the green plants and the chemo-
and photoautotrophic bacteria) produce organic carbon compounds by reducing CO2 using
energy coming from the sun or from inorganic chemical compounds. The primary producers
use a portion of the produced organic material for their own metabolism whereby CO2 is
produced and emitted into the surroundings. The heterotrophic organisms (animals, fungi
and decay-bacteria) are powered by breaking down organic matter that is ultimately derived
from the autotrophic organisms. As the energy is used up in the food chains, organically
bound carbon is released as CO2 to the atmosphere. On land, the larger plants take up
CO2 (with a concentration of 0.3%) from the atmosphere. From the free air and through
the stomata, the CO2 diffuses into the leaf where the photosynthesis takes place.
CO2 Combustion
Plants Animals
Detritus
Plankton algae CO2 Decomposers
Animals
Detritus
Coal, Oil, Chalk

Decomposers
Fig. 16. The biogeochemical cycle of carbon [13].
The uptake of CO2 by land plants is sometimes so pronounced that it can be detected as a
concentration drop in the atmosphere. In the height of a forest canopy on a sunny summer
day, a pronounced minimum can be recorded around noon where the photosynthetic activity
is at its peak. Variations can also be seen between the seasons, see Fig. 17. In the summer, the
CO2 concentration in the atmosphere is lower than in the winter when the photosynthesis
process comes to a standstill or is greatly reduced. Thus, variations in atmospheric CO2
content can be recorded during day and night, vertically and seasonally.
29
400
CO2 in atmosphere, ppm
320 360
1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010

Year
Fig. 17. The concentration (ppm = parts per million = µl/l) of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the atmosphere
has been measured in Hawaii since 1958. Over the 58 years that the figure illustrates, measurements
demonstrate a drastic increase in the atmospheric content of carbon dioxide, from about 290 ppm
in 1850 to 400 ppm in 2016. Other measurements taken around the world confirm this development
of which consequences for the world’s climate is unknown. The dashed curve shows the seasonal
variation in atmospheric CO2 content, which is lowest in summer when the plants’ photosynthesis
and thus CO2 consumption is highest [12].
LIFE SCIENCE IN UMEÅ, SWEDEN

– YOUR CHOICE!
• 32 000 students • world class research • top class teachers
• modern campus • ranked nr 1 in Sweden by international students
• study in English
– Bachelor’s programme in Life Science

– Master’s programme in Chemistry
– Master’s programme in Molecular Biology
APPLY
NOW!
30
In the aquatic environment, conditions are different. Here there are only a few plants that
can survive with the limited CO2 which is dissolved in the water. This is because the diffusion
rate of CO2 in water is only a fraction of the diffusion rate in air. Only the smallest single-
celled planktonic algae and mosses with thin leafs can adequately absorb CO2, by passive
diffusion across the outer surfaces. However, the diffusion distances in larger planktonic
algae (more than about 30 µm in diameter) and in macroplants are so long that the CO2
concentration is too low to ensure sufficient photosynthesis. These plants therefore take up
CO2 through the carbonic acid system occurring in water:
CO2 + H2O ⇋ H2CO3 ⇋ H+ + HCO3- ⇋ 2H+ + CO3--
Aquatic plants that cannot cope with the passive uptake of CO2 from the surrounding water,
actively take up HCO3-. In the plants’ chloroplasts the enzyme carbonic anhydrase catalyzes
the process: 2HCO3- → CO2 + H2O + CO3--. The CO2 that is split off is then used for
photosynthesis. The “carbonic acid system” in water implies that the photosynthesis gives
rise to a shift to a higher pH in the water, while the supply of CO2 caused by respiration
processes has the opposite effect. Thus, it is well known that the pH increases during the
day in the upper layers of water penetrated with light, while it drops during the night. It is
well known that pH can drop significantly due to CO2 production in the bottom sediments,
or in the water below light exposed water masses (photic zone), where settling organic
materials are being broken down by bacteria. The carbon circulation in the biosphere has
two distinct circuits, one on land and one at sea. The total amount of CO2 that marine
phytoplankton take up per year is of the same magnitude as the amount of CO2 that land
plants bind by their gross primary production. The carbon cycle in the ocean is practically
self-maintained. However, there is a lively exchange of CO2 between the atmosphere and
the ocean caused by winds and waves, which ensure that the amount of dissolved CO2 in
the oceans’ surface layer is in equilibrium with the concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere.
Because the oceans tend to be stratified (due to thermocline), there is only a limited
circulation between the surface water masses and the bottom water. Thus, it takes about
1,000 years to replace the water in the deepest parts of the ocean. In contrast, the CO2 in
the atmosphere is much more quickly circulated. Measurement of radioactive carbon-14
after the nuclear bomb-blasting tests in the early 1960s has shown that the residence time
of the CO2 in the atmosphere before it is dissolved in the sea is about 7 years. The carbon
that land plants bind by their photosynthesis is sooner or later returned to the atmosphere
when organic matter decomposes in the food chains. The decomposition of the organic
matter takes place quickly in the tropics (10–30 years) while the process is much slower in
the northern regions (several hundred years).
31
The photosynthesis by land plants removes annually about 100 billion tons of carbon from
the atmosphere in the form of carbon dioxide. Land plant and soil respiration (i.e. total
decomposition of organic matter) releases carbon dioxide equivalent to 2 × 50 billion tons
per year. Burning of coal and oil (fossil fuel) and the burning of tropical rainforests releases
5 and 2 billion tons of carbon, respectively. Physical and chemical processes at sea level
release about 100 billion tons of carbon into the atmosphere while around 104 billion tons
are taken up in the oceans. The annual net addition of carbon dioxide to the atmosphere is
equivalent to about 3 billion tons of carbon, see Fig. 18. This increase in atmospheric carbon
dioxide, which absorbs infrared radiation, results in increasing “greenhouse effect” and thus
an increased global temperature. In earlier geological periods the breakdown was less than
the amount of carbon fixed, and therefore large amounts of carbon accumulated as coal and
oil. But since the beginning of the Industrial Revolution in the mid-1800s, mankind has
performed a large-scale global geochemical experiment by burning large quantities of fossil
fuels. Since 1850, the atmospheric CO2 concentration has increased from approximately
290 ppm to nearly 350 ppm in 1990, with about 50% of the increase occurring since the
mid-1960s. In 2016, the CO2 concentration had further increased to 400 ppm for the first
time in the last 800,000 years [12].
Yearly increase in atmosphere

FOSSIL RESPIRATION PHOTOSYNTHESIS BURNING OF RESPIRATION PHYSICO-CHEMICAL
FUEL BY PLANTS BY PLANTS TROPICAL FORESTS BY SOIL DIFFUSION
5 50 100 2 50 100
Size of reservoir (billion tons)

Wold’s vegetation 560
World’s soil 1.500
Atmosphere 735 104
Oceans 36.000
Reserves of fossil fuel 5.000-10.000
Fig. 18. The global cycle of carbon. All rates are given in billion tons per year [15].
32
The total increase in the atmospheric content can account for about one third of the total 200
billion tons of CO2, which has so far been released from fossil fuels. Part of the remaining
CO2 have probably been taken up in the oceans, resulting in acidification of the water. Thus,
the pH of ocean surface waters has decreased from 8.25 in 1751 to 8.14 in 2004, and the
pH may further decline to around 7.85 in 2100, which will result in incalculable damage
effects on marine life [14]. But a significant portion of the CO2 that is not absorbed in the
oceans, may very likely result in an increase of the vegetation on land. Studies have shown
that plants grow faster when the ambient atmosphere is enriched with CO2. It is therefore
possible that the burning of oil and gas causes a “fertilization” of forests and agricultural
areas. However, there is no evidence for this fertilization effect.
33
3.2.1 INCREASED GREENHOUSE EFFECT
Since 1958 reliable measurements have been made of the atmospheric carbon dioxide
content. Fig. 17 shows that the content of carbon dioxide is increasing. It is not currently
known to what extent this increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide content will be able to
change the world’s climate. But there is reason for concern. Calculations have given some
evidence that a doubling of atmospheric carbon dioxide content (from 300 ppm to 600 ppm)
could raise the Earth’s average temperature by 2.5 °C which is enough to melt some of the
huge amounts of polar ice and put large areas of land under water, as has been the case in
previous warm geological periods. The term “global warming”, used in the climate debate,
refers to the increase in global average temperature, which has been measured since 1900
and more intensively after 1975. Since 1915 the global temperature has increased by about
0.8 °C. There is evidence that the increase in temperature has already resulted in increased
depth to the permafrost in Alaska, smaller maximum spread of ice around Antarctica, and
increased withdrawal of European glaciers. If the trend continues, there will be less rainfall
at the lower latitudes and more precipitation at higher latitudes. Signs of such a trend have
been observed already in the late 1980s [12, 15]. The so-called “greenhouse gases” consist in
addition to CO2 of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs).
Possible future climatic changes can be assessed by studying the correlation between the
atmospheric content of “greenhouse gases” and climatic changes in the past geological periods.
Analyses of air bubbles in Antarctic ice cores have been used to study the conditions 160,000
years back. It has been found that there is a “positive feedback” (i.e. an increased effect)
between the temperature and the greenhouse gases carbon dioxide and methane. When
the temperature goes up (as in the last interglacial period) the microbial decomposition of
organic matter increases, releasing carbon dioxide. Under anaerobic conditions (swamps,
bogs, moist soil) the bacterial decomposition of organic matter takes place by fermentation
whereby methane (“swamp gas”) is produced. Methane is 20 times more effective than carbon
dioxide in absorbing longwave heat radiation from the Earth. An increasing temperature
leads to an increased release of “greenhouse gases” and thus an increased temperature. This
self-reinforcing warming effect has been called “the respiratory feedback mechanism”.
34
3.3 NITROGEN CYCLE

Nitrogen (N2) constitutes 79% of the atmosphere, but only few living organisms can utilize
this nitrogen directly [16, 60]. Plants and animals can only take advantage of “fixed” nitrogen
in form of nitrate (NO3-) or ammonia (NH3). A few species of prokaryotes (characterized
by not having a cell nucleus) comprising bacteria, cyanobacteria and actinobacteria are
able to fix atmospheric nitrogen. Usually a distinction is made between symbiotic nitrogen
collectors (e.g. nodule bacteria on legume plants, Rhizobium, and actinomycetes in symbiosis
with plants, such as alder, sweet gale, sea buckthorn) and free-living nitrogen collectors
(cyanobacteria: Anabaena, Nostoc and others, and bacteria: Azotobacter (aerobic), Clostridium
(anaerobic)), see Figs. 19 & 20.
N2 in atmosphere
biological
electrical and photo- symbiotic and free-living

chemical nitrogen-fixa- nitrogen collectors
industrial
fixation
denitrification NH3
NO, NO
2
plants, R-NH
2
animals, R-NH
2
uptake by detritus, R-NH

2
plants
urine
deamination by
burning of coal denitrifying decomposers
and oil etc. bacteria
anammox
acid rain
NH4+ (ammonium)
NO2- (nitrite)
NO3- (nitrate)
nitrification
Fig. 19. The biogeochemical cycle of nitrogen [14]. Four types of processes operate the nitrogen cycle: 1) nitrogen-
fixation and incorporation of nitrogen as amino groups (R = NH2) in the living organisms, 2) deamination,
whereby the organically bound nitrogen is released as ammonia, 3) nitrification, whereby bacteria convert
ammonium (NH4+) to nitrite (NO2-) and nitrate (NO3-), and 4) denitrification (nitrate respiration), whereby bacteria
under anaerobic conditions convert nitrate to free nitrogen in the presence of easily degradable organic matter,
or sulphur, see table 2. In addition, certain bacteria under anaerobic conditions perform a denitrification process
called anammox (= anaerobic ammonium oxidation): NH4+ + NO2- → N2 + H2O [18].
35
Step Compound Formula Dot formula
O
+5 Nitrate ion NO3-
O N O
+3 Nitrite ion NO2- O N O
0 Nitrogen N2 N N
H N H
-3 Ammonia NH3
H
Fig. 20. When two elements chemically combine, their atoms share
one or more electrons in the atoms’ outer electron shell, which is
particularly stable when 8 electrons are present. Atoms of nitrogen and
oxygen, lacking only a few electrons in having filled the outer electron
shell, try to cover the missing electrons by taking up electrons from
other atoms that bind less to them. This principle explains why nitrogen
(N) can have several oxidation steps, depending on whether the nitrogen
is part of the hydrogen (H) or oxygen (O) under formation of nitrate
(NO3-), nitrite (NO2-) or ammonia (NH3). In the oxidized states (+) the
electrons of the nitrogen atom fill the outer electron shell of the oxygen
atom. In the reduced (-) state the outer electron shell of the nitrogen
atom is filled with the electrons of the hydrogen atoms.
36
Plant roots easily absorb ammonia and nitrate, in the soil, and the absorbed nitrogen
compounds are incorporated into amino acids, which in turn are incorporated into
proteins. When the plants die and decompose, or are eaten by animals and the proteins are
transported through the food chains, the amino groups (-NH2) of the amino acids are split
off and released to the surroundings as ammonia (NH3), or excreted in the urine as urea.
This process is called deamination. Ammonia and ammonium (NH4+) is a corresponding
acid-base pair. At pH 7, the concentration of ammonium is about 200 × higher than the
concentration of ammonia. Ammonium does not leach out very easy because the positive
charge allows it to bind to the negatively charged particles of clay and humus in the soil.
Nevertheless, the nitrogen compounds leach because the ammonium ions can be oxidized to
nitrite (NO2-) of chemoautotrophic bacteria (Nitrosomonas). Nitrite can be further converted
to nitrate (NO3-) by other bacteria (Nitrobacter). The conversion of ammonia to nitrite and
further to nitrate is called nitrification. Under anaerobic conditions, nitrate is reduced to
free nitrogen by a process known as denitrification, which is performed by the bacterium
Pseudomonas denitrificans: glucose + NO3- → CO2 + N2 + 2387 kJ. The process with O2
per mol glucose would have given an energy output of 2872 kJ. Thus, there is almost as
much energy gain by anaerobic denitrification as by combustion with oxygen, see Table 2.
Since it was learned to fix free atmospheric nitrogen through industrial processes, the
consumption of nitrogen fertilizers has increased dramatically. The natural biological fixation
Click here
to learn more
TAKE THE
RIGHT TRACK Give your career a head start
by studying with us. Experience the advantages
of our collaboration with major companies like
ABB, Volvo and Ericsson!
Apply by World class

www.mdh.se
15 January research
37
of nitrogen on land is of the order of 44 million tons per year, but the industrial fixation
is almost as large (30 million tons per year). This in combination with a strong increase
in the use of nitrogen fixing legumes, has given rise to increased nitrate concentrations in
ground- and surface water. The result is nitrate polluted groundwater and eutrophicated
rivers, lakes and coastal waters. Changed cultivation practices and use of excess manure at
the wrong times of the year have also been an important factor for the worsened situation
in many industrialised countries. In particular, sandy soils cannot retain nitrate, which leaks
down into the groundwater when the vegetation is insufficient to take it up. Globally, it
is estimated that today more nitrogen is fixed biologically, industrially and atmospherically
(92 million tons per year) than denitrified (83 million tons per year). This means that we
have significantly gained influence on the global nitrogen balance. Until now plant growth
both on land and in the sea has been limited by nitrogen, and therefore it is clear that an
increased fixation of nitrogen not being matched by a corresponding denitrification will
result in ecological disorders.
Finally it should be mentioned that the photo chemical and electrical processes in the
atmosphere can oxidize N2 to nitrogen oxides (NO and NO2), which can also be formed by
burning of oil and coal and brought to the soil by rain as nitric acid – on weight basis, this
nitrogen contribution is about 1/10 of the biological fixation. It is a thoughtful consideration
that without denitrifying bacteria, the oceans would be a nitric acid solution. Denitrification
must therefore have been developed soon after the emergence of O2 in the atmosphere. In
1999, the scientific world was surprised when a previously unknown denitrification process
was identified. It turned out that some bacteria under anaerobic conditions can perform
denitrification by a process called anammox (= anaerobic ammonium oxidation), where
ammonium and nitrite are converted to free nitrogen and water: NH4+ + NO2- → N2 +
H2O. Globally, this process is responsible for 30–50% of the free nitrogen produced in the
oceans. Anammox is the main sink of fixed nitrogen and thus directly contributing to the
limitation of the primary production in the oceans [17, 18].
Very large quantities of nitrogen are bonded in the oceans’ sediments and rocks in the
Earth’s crust, but since the turnover of this nitrogen is very slow, unlike the atmospheric
nitrogen, the nitrogen cycle is of the gaseous biogeochemical type.
38
Reaction Energy yield (kJ per mol)
Denitrification
1 C6H12O6 + 6KNO3 → 6CO2 + 3H2O + 6KOH + 3N2O 2282
glucose potassium potassium dinitrogen
nitrate hydroxide oxide
2 5C6H12O6 + 24KNO3 → 30CO2 + 18H2O + 24KOH + 12N2 2387 (per mol glucose)
nitrogen
3 5S + 6KNO3 + 2CaCO3 → 3K2SO4 + 2CaSO4 + 2CO2 + 3N2 553 (per mol sulphur)
sulphur potassium calcium
sulphate sulphate
Respiration
4 C6H12O6 + 6O2 → 6CO2 + 6H2O 2872
carbon water
dioxide
Deamination (ammonification)
5 CH2NH2COOH + 1.5O2 → 2CO2 + H2O + NH3 737
glycine oxygen ammonia
Nitrification
6 NH3 + 1.5O2 → HNO2 + H2O 276
nitrous acid
7 KNO2 + 0.5O2 → KNO3 73

potassium
nitrite
Nitrogen fixation
8 N2 → 2N “activation” of nitrogen -670
9 2N + 3H2 → 2NH3 54
Table 2. The energy yield of various chemical reactions of interest to the nitrogen cycle (14).
39
3.4 SULPHUR CYCLE

All living organisms contain sulphur (about 1.2% on dry weight basis). The most common
form of sulphur (S) is sulphhydryl (-SH) groups in organic molecules. The heterotrophic
organisms cover their individual requirements by consuming sulphur-containing amino acids
(cysteine and methionine) which the plants have built by incorporating sulphur absorbed
through the roots as inorganic sulphate (SO4--) or through the leaves as sulphur dioxide
(SO2). By aerobic bacterial decomposition, sulphate is released from the dead organic matter,
but under anaerobic conditions, for example in the deeper sediment layers, decomposition
of organic matter results in formation of hydrogen sulphide (H2S). Hydrogen sulphide that
is emitted to the atmosphere by spontaneous oxidation can be converted into SO2. But SO2
is also produced by combustion of coal, oil and gas, etc., see Fig. 21.
UNIVERSITY WEST
IN SWEDEN
With a University West master’s degree,
you’ll have the opportunity to gain the
skills you need to thrive - as a person
and as a professional.
40
photochemical oxidation
SO3 (sulphur trioxide) SO2 (sulphur dioxide)
plants, R-SH animals, R-SH
burning
acid rain
detritus, R-SH spontaneous oxidation

in atmosphere
microbial
breakdown
coal, oil etc.
SO42- (sulphate)
I
III IV
S (sulphur)
FeS2 (pyrite) II H2S (hydrogen sulphide)
FeS (iron sulphide)
Fig. 21. The biogeochemical cycle of sulphur [3, 16]. The Roman numerals close to the
arrows, showing the turnover of sulphate, hydrogen sulphide and sulphur, refer to:
I: a) spontaneous chemical reaction in an oxygen-rich environment

b) photoautotrophic sulphur bacteria:
2nCO2+ 4nH2O+ nH2S → (infrared light) → 2(CH2O)n + 2nH2O + 2nH+ + nSO4--
c) chemoautotrophic sulphur bacteria (Thiobacillus): chemical energy and no light power
the process, thereby forming organic material and sulphate.
II: a) chemoautotrophic bacteria (Beggiatoa = “white sulphur bacteria”):

nCO2 + 2nH2S → (chemical energy) → (CH2O)n + 2nS + nH2O
b) photoautotrophic sulphur bacteria:
nCO2 + 2nH2S → (infrared light) → (CH2O)n + nH2O +2nS
III: denitrifying bacteria:

5S + 6KNO3 + 2CaCO3 → 3K2SO4 + 2CaSO4 + 2CO2 + 3N2 + energy.
IV: sulphate-reducing bacteria (Desulfovibrio): in the absence of oxygen, these bacteria

respire by using SO4-- (instead of O2), leading to the formation of CO2 and H2S (and
not H2O, as in the respiratory process in an oxygen-rich environment). This causes
the sulphur to be in a gaseous form, which may be released to the atmosphere.
41
In small amounts SO2 may fertilise plants, but in larger quantities the compound is harmful.
By photochemical oxidation in the atmosphere, SO2 can be converted to SO3, which reacts
with water to form sulphuric acid (H2SO4), which together with nitric acid formed by
air pollution with nitrogen oxides, falls to the ground as “acid rain” (16). Acid rain can
cause forest decline and acidification of specially decalcified lakes [19]. In recent years in
Norway and Sweden, acid rain has wiped out fish stocks in many hundreds of lakes. But
“acid rain”, defined as rain with pH below 5.65, can give rise to other injuries. Sandstone,
containing calcium carbonate (CaCO3), decays much faster in sulphur contaminated air.
Striking examples are the historic monuments of Greece and Italy that have stood up to
several thousand years without major changes, but over the last decades, have suffered
much damage. This is because acid rain or dry deposit of sulphur dioxide (SO2), e.g. from
diesel cars, deposited on the monuments, react with the calcium carbonate forming soluble
calcium sulphate (plaster), which is easily washed away by rainwater.
Open your mind to

new opportunities
With 34,000 students, Linnaeus University is
one of the larger universities in Sweden. We
are a modern university, known for our strong
international profile. Every year more than Bachelor programmes in
2,000 international students from all over the Business & Economics | Computer Science/IT |
world choose to enjoy the friendly atmosphere Design | Mathematics
and active student life at Linnaeus University.
Master programmes in
Welcome to join us! Business & Economics | Behavioural Sciences | Computer
Science/IT | Cultural Studies & Social Sciences | Design |
Mathematics | Natural Sciences | Technology & Engineering
Summer Academy courses
42
Under anaerobic conditions in aqueous environments SO4-- can be converted to hydrogen

sulphide (H2S), by for example Desulfovibrio bacteria that are sulphate reducing. With the
aid of these bacteria, SO4-- is used for oxidizing organic matter, forming H2S, which in
the anaerobic (anoxic) sediments can react with iron (Fe+++) to form FeS (iron sulphide)
whereby the colour of the sediment becomes black. After some time, the iron sulphide is
eventually converted to pyrite (FeS2), which gives the deeper zone in the sediment a greyish
colour. Deposits of plant residues in oxygen-poor water where the breakdown is incomplete,
can lead to the formation of peat and brown coal with a high content of pyrite. When
pyrite by drainage or peat digging comes into contact with atmospheric oxygen, it can be
oxidized into sulphuric acid (H2SO4) and ochre (Fe(OH)3) in water. Brown coal digging
in Denmark during the two World Wars resulted in formation of extremely acidic lakes
in the former lignite excavation areas. Thus, a creek that drains a former digging area is
extremely acidic with pH = 2–3. At such a low pH, pyrite is not spontaneously oxidized in
an oxygenated environment, but some chemoautotrophic bacteria (Thiobacillus ferrooxidans)
may instead oxidize the pyrite to sulphate and ferric ions (Fe+++). When the pH rises, the
dissolved oxidized iron precipitates as ochre. Ochre pollution is the consequence which is
a problem seen not only in relation to peat and brown coal digging, but is also frequently
seen when the groundwater level is lowered by drainage of fields and straightening of rivers.
In aquatic environments with abundant organic matter, so much hydrogen sulphide may be
produced that it penetrates right up to the sediment surface, where photosynthetic sulphur
bacteria (green and purple sulphur bacteria) utilise the hydrogen sulphide, if enough infrared
light is penetrating down to the bottom. If no light is present, chemoautotrophic “white
sulphur bacteria” can exploit the chemical energy in the H2S, producing organic matter by
consumption of CO2 and formation of SO4-- (Thiobacillus) or elemental sulphur (Beggiatoa).
Finally, hydrogen sulfide released into the oxygen-rich water can be spontaneously converted
to SO4--.
The importance of sulphate breathing bacteria for the turnover in marine sediments is
great. About 50% of the decomposition of organic matter (mineralization) at the bottom
of a temperate marine area (Limfjorden in Denmark) is performed by sulphate breathing
bacteria – which also means that 50% of the oxygen consumption at the bottom is used for
oxidation of H2S. This acts as a carrier of energy from the deeper anoxic to the overlying
aerated (aerobic) zone near the sediment surface [20].
43
If the oxygen concentration at the bottom is very low (less than 2 mg O2l-1) and if at the
same time an abundance of hydrogen sulphide is produced, the “white sulphur bacteria”,
which are often seen as excessive white films on the bottom, may no longer be able to
absorb and transform the hydrogen sulphide, which is a powerful environmental poison.
Hydrogen sulphide can then penetrate the sediment and come up into the overlying water,
which kills the benthic fauna. This phenomenon caused by oxygen depletion has, since the
1970s, become an increasingly widespread and more frequent phenomenon in the many
marine coastal and shallow areas, due to increasing eutrophication (nutrient overloading
from domestic waste and agriculture). Although sulphur has a gas phase in the atmosphere,
this is not a large reservoir (though the turnover rate of sulphur in the atmosphere is poorly
known). The large reservoir is found in sediment. The sulphur cycle is therefore of the
sedimentary biogeochemical cycle type.
3.5 PHOSPHORUS CYCLE

Most biologically important elements – apart from the already mentioned (C, N, S) – have
only a small or no reservoir in the atmosphere. An example is phosphorus (P) present in
the environment as a phosphate (PO4---) or one of its analogues (HPO4--, H2PO4-). The
importance of phosphorus for living organisms appears from the fact that it is for example
part of the ATP molecules that control the biochemical transfer of energy in the cells.
Free phosphate ions are taken up across the outer surfaces of the phytoplankton cells or
through the roots of larger plants and incorporated into the living tissues. Phosphorus
passes through the grazing food chain in the same way as nitrogen and sulphur, and excess
phosphorus is predominantly excreted in faeces. Inorganic phosphate is released into the
abiotic environment when the decomposers in the detritus food chain break down the
phosphorus-containing organic material in faeces or dead plants and animals. The organic
phase of the biogeochemical cycling of phosphorus is very simple. The inorganic phase
of the phosphorus cycle is more complex and less well known, especially in terms of its
turnover in sediments [3, 7]. Sediments take up or release phosphate, depending on the
chemical conditions. Under aerobic conditions, there are often found large quantities of
phosphate bound to oxidized iron compounds (Fe+++) in the upper sediment layers (FePO4).
In summer, where there may be oxygen depletion at the bottom, sulphide can penetrate up
to the sediment surface and reduce the iron compounds producing iron sulfide, resulting
in the release of phosphate. The widespread and frequent incidents of oxygen depletion in
certain eutrophicated shallow marine areas, therefore leading to significantly higher phosphate
concentrations in the water during summer than during winter when the sediment surface
is oxidized (and light brown, due to iron hydroxides = “rust”). The first case of oxygen
depletion during summer starts an “evil circle” where the released phosphate (which is the
limiting nutrient factor in early summer) causes an increase in the phytoplankton production,
which during the summer and early fall triggers new incidents of oxygen depletion [20].
44
Phosphate is only to a lesser extent washed out of the ground. The reason is that phosphate
reacts chemically with the aluminium, calcium, manganese and iron ions, and form poorly
soluble compounds. The plants cannot absorb phosphate bound in these compounds, and
thus the amount of biologically available phosphate is not only determined by the absolute
amount of phosphate in an ecosystem, but rather by the speed at which it is recycled.
Especially in many freshwater lakes, where the “mobile pool” of phosphate is very small.
Thus, it is the phosphate that is the limiting factor for the growth of phytoplankton in
many lakes. They receive larger or smaller amounts of nitrate leached from surrounding
agricultural areas, but because phosphate, not being leached from the soil, is the limiting
factor, the nitrate does not cause immediate problems with growth of plankton algae.
But if domestic sewage, containing relatively high amounts of bioavailable phosphorous
is discharged at the same time (often being the case), causing rapid growth (“bloom”) of
phytoplankton then this can result in a series of environmental problems [21]. If a lake
during a number of years, has received phosphate containing wastewater, a large pool of
phosphate may have been bound in the mud at the bottom of the lake. This phosphate will
be released (“mobilized”) due to eutrophication and deposition of organic matter, if anoxic
conditions develop at the bottom. Therefore, a stop for further discharge of phosphate will
only have an effect many years later.
In the past four years we have drilled
89,000 km
That’s more than twice around the world.
Who are we?

We are the world’s largest oilfield services company1.
Working globally—often in remote and challenging locations—
we invent, design, engineer, and apply technology to help our
customers find and produce oil and gas safely.
Who are we looking for?

Every year, we need thousands of graduates to begin
dynamic careers in the following domains:
n Engineering, Research and Operations
n Geoscience and Petrotechnical
n Commercial and Business
What will you be?
careers.slb.com
Based on Fortune 500 ranking 2011. Copyright © 2015 Schlumberger. All rights reserved.
1
45
3.6 WATER CYCLE

Solar energy drives the water cycle [1, 7]. The sun heats the ocean surface, and large amounts
of water evapourates and rise into the air. The lower temperature at higher altitudes makes
the water vapour condense into clouds, which consists of very small water droplets. Winds,
which are also driven by solar energy, blow clouds into areas of land where they are cooled
to form precipitation in the form of rain, snow and hail. Rainfall can accumulate as ice
caps and glaciers, which can store frozen water for thousands of years; but a large part of
the water, which hits the ground surface, evapourates again. Only a small proportion of
the precipitation is taken up by plants, but most of the water evapourates quickly from
the leaves. A portion of the precipitation, which does not evapourate, flows through the
ground or runs through drain pipes to lakes and streams, and then back to the sea. But
the remainder of the precipitation seeps into the ground through the topsoil and becomes
groundwater. In the upper part of the soil where there is air present in the small cavities,
the water moves vertically downwards. This part of the soil is called the unsaturated zone. If
the soil is sandy, the water moves down with a speed of about 4 m per year; but if the soil
is clayey, the movement is only 0.5 m per year. At a certain depth is the groundwater zone
where all pores and small cavities are filled with water. The top of the groundwater zone
is called the water table. In the groundwater zone, water moves more or less horizontally
to areas where the water table is lower. Much of the uppermost water in the groundwater
zone flows with a slight inclination towards rivers, lakes and the sea. From here, the water
evapourates again and the cycle is closed. In this great cycle, the water moves at very different
speeds. Water moves very slowly in the groundwater zone, and a drop of water that has
fallen on a field far inland, can spend several thousand years to reach the sea. Some orders
of magnitude for how long time water stays in the individual stages are: clouds 10 days,
streams 20 days, lakes 10 years, unsaturated groundwater zone 5 years, saturated zone with
sand 500 years, saturated zone with moraine clay 10,000 years, the sea 3000 years. The oceans
contain 97% of all water in the biosphere, about 2% is bound in ice caps and glaciers, 1%
is found in lakes, rivers and groundwater; only a negligible amount is in the atmosphere.
46
GENERAL ECOLOGY Population ecology
4 POPULATION ECOLOGY
A population is defined as all individuals of the same species in a given area. A population
has a number of features that are characteristic of this organization level, and not found
on the organizational level below (individual) or above (community). A population has, for
example, an age structure, a distribution, and a density, see Fig. 22. This chapter describes how
populations are regulated by means of a complex interplay with the ambient environment.
Uniform Random Clumped, but groups

distribution distribution randomly distributed
B Age classes
100
95
90
85
80
75
Age classes 70
65
80 60
75
55
70
65 50
60 45
55 40
50
35
45
40 30
35 25
30 20
25
20 15
15 10
10 Mexico 5 Denmark
5 0
0
10 8 6 4 2 0 2 4 6 8 10 5 4 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 5
Percent of population Percent of population
Fig. 22. Populations have a number of features not found in the

individual (cf. “the hierarchical control principle”). For example, a
population has a distribution, a density, an age structure, and a birth-
and death rate. The figure illustrates (A) the possible distributions
and densities of a population in an area, and (B) the age structure of
males and females in the population of people in the two countries,
Mexico and Denmark, with different population growth rates.
4.1 REGULATION OF POPULATION DENSITY

A population’s size, density, age structure and growth is regulated by a complex interplay
of impacts from: 1) the abiotic surroundings, 2) populations of other species (interspecific
factors), and 3) impacts from the population itself (intraspecific factors), see Fig. 23.
47
INTERSPECIFIC FACTORS
(OTHER POPULATIONS)
COMPETITION
PREDATION/PARASITISM
SYMBIOSIS
ABIOTIC INCREASED/DECREASED
FACTORS
POPULATION POPULATION DENSITY
INTRASPECIFIC FACTORS
(FEEDBACK)
Fig. 23. Factors which affect the density of a population.
Some populations are regulated mainly by abiotic factors. Other populations are regulated
to a high degree by predators that pursue the individuals of the population. Still other
populations are regulated mainly through competition with other populations’ species,
which partially exploit the same food resources. Finally, there are also populations, which
are largely self-regulating and do not grow larger than the area can feed over a long period
of time [60].
48
In the following, some examples are given of interaction between populations and their
abiotic- and biotic surroundings, with emphasis on explaining how abiotic, inter- and
intraspecific factors can regulate populations’ growth and thus their size and distribution.
4.1.1 NICHE CONCEPT AND IMPORTANCE OF ABIOTIC FACTORS FOR

REGULATION OF POPULATIONS
It has been proposed to define the ecological niche of a species that the niche can only
contain one species in a given ecosystem. But this definition is not entirely satisfactory. A
more precise definition of an organism’s niche can be derived as follows: Plot linearly on
an x-axis an environmental factor (e.g. temperature) for a species S1, see Fig. 24. On the
axis is marked the interval x’- x” (“tolerance width”) within which the species can survive.
Out along a y-axis is marked the interval y’ – y” of another environmental factor (e.g. pH)
within which the species can survive. The resulting area containing the points with respect
to the two environmental factors x and y indicates S1’s ability to maintain a population. A
third factor z can be treated in the same way, which generates a volume that contains points
that describe S2’s environmental requirements in relation to three factors. If n -environmental
factors are treated in the same way, then an n-dimensional hyper-volume, N1, can be created.
The points contained in N1 correspond to all the environmental combinations where S1 can
maintain a population and N1 is called species S1’s “fundamental niche”. The fundamental
niche thus describes the physiological tolerance limits.
y’’
niche
y’
x
x’ x’’
Fig. 24. Two dimensions of the fundamental niche of a species

with regard to the environmental factors x and y.
49
The above model for the description of a species’ niche is more accurate and comprehensive
than the commonly used definition of a niche as a species’ “profession” in the ecosystem (as
opposed to the species’ habitat). One must be aware that the n-dimensional niche model
does not take into account that any tolerance range for a given environmental factor has
an optimum where the species thrives, and that the “graphic” mode of expression does
not allow a description of, for example, that certain environmental factors can mutually
influence each other’s tolerance width. As an example, the growth of diatoms in a lake
can be used to demonstrate how abiotic factors can be dominating in the regulation of
a population’s size. When light and temperature conditions are favourable in the spring,
the diatoms begin to grow fast due to the ample amounts of nutrients in the water at this
time of year. Because the zooplankton is only represented by a few individuals in the early
spring, the algae grow unimpeded until the nutrient silicon (Si) is exhausted and thereby
limiting further growth. The diatom bloom in early spring and the subsequent reduction
is governed exclusively by the abiotic factors (light and silicon). When the diatom growth
ceases due to silicon shortage, other algal species get a chance to grow. The growth of these
algae can in turn be strongly regulated by zooplankton, which by their “grazing” can reduce
the concentration of phytoplankton. Regulation of the zooplankton, which tends to graze
the algae down, takes place through fish predation of the zooplankton. This creates balance
in the ecosystem so that the size of the various populations fluctuates (oscillates) around a
more or less constant value.
4.1.2 IMPORTANCE OF INTERSPECIFIC FACTORS FOR REGULATION

OF POPULATIONS
There are many kinds of interactions between populations. The interspecific factors can be
subdivided into a number of types, between which, there can be gradual transitions. Interspecific
factors can be classified as: 1) competition, 2) predation or parasitism, 3) symbiosis. In the
following, these phenomena are described with some examples.
4.1.2.1 Competition
When the fundamental niches of two species completely or partly overlap one another, there
will be competition for food and/or space (see Figs. 25 & 26). This kind of competition
is called interspecific competition. The following sections describe four types of observations
that illustrate or demonstrate interspecific competition, which is very important for the
distribution of animals and plants in nature.
50
distance
between
niche tops
resource utilisation
species species
A B
niche
overlap
niche dimension
Fig. 25. A dimension of an ecological niche. The two bell-shaped

curves represent resource utilization of two species in a community.
The niche dimension may represent the temperature, pH, or, for
example, the size of food particles, which are eaten by the two
species. The competition is most intense where there is niche
overlap, resulting in restrictions in the two species distribution.
Such interspecific competition results in selection of individuals
that do not have overlap. This leads eventually to a separation
of the two species with completely separated niches (i.e.
diversification niche).
INNOVATIVE
LIKE YOU.
51
70
60
50
Corophium Hydrobia
40
30
20
10
0
3 6 12 24 48 96 192 364
Particle size, μm
Fig. 26. The size distribution of mineral particles found in the

intestine of the deposit-feeding amphipod crustacean Corophium
volutator and the deposit-feeding mud snail Hydrobia ulvae [22].
The two species are often living together on sandy tidal flats,
where they utilise the micro-organisms that sit on the particles.
The two species have “shared” the food resources by swallowing
particles of different size. Interspecific competition occurs where
there is “niche overlap” of the coexisting deposit-feeders, which
implies that the realized niche of both species is narrower than it
would have been if the competitor was not present.
1) Displacement of a species from another species
In the 1930s, the Russian biologist Georgy Gause conducted a large number of laboratory
experiments on competition between different species of single-celled ciliates of the genus
Paramecium fed with bacteria or yeast cells. In some of the experiments, two species were
cultivated separately with the amount of feed offered (bacteria) kept constant. After some
time the Paramecium populations grew up to the size that was allowed by the food supply,
see Fig. 27. Subsequently, the two species of Paramecium were grown in the same culture
chamber at the same constant amount of food. Up to about the fourth day, both species
populations grew. But when the food resources were fully utilized, one of the species
decreased in number while the other (more efficient) species still increased in number. After
about 16 days, the less effective species was extinct while the effective species approximately
attained a population size similar to that achieved when it was cultured alone.
52
P. caudatum (N2)
N2 together with P. aurelia
K2= 64
80
dN2 64 - N2
= 0.794 N x
40 dt 2 64
dN2 64 - N2 - βN1
= 0.794 N x
N1 and N2 (volume)
0 dt 2 64
P. aurelia (N1)
N1 together with P. caudatum
K1= 105
80 dN1 105 - N1
= 1.124 N x
dt 1 105
40 dN1 105 -αN2

= 1.124 N x
dt 1 105
0
2 6 10 14 18 days
Fig. 27. Growth of two ciliates (Paramecium aurelia and P. caudatum) that have “the same niche”.
The figure shows the growth of the two ciliates when cultured separately, or in a mixed culture.
It is seen that P. caudatum is competed by P. aurelia [23]. The mathematical expressions for the
growth of the two ciliates are explained in section 4.2.
Environment Percentage of experiments that won
hot-humid Y (100) X (0)
hot-dry X (90) Y (10)
temperate-moist Y (86) X (14)
temperate-dry X (87) Y (13)
cold-humid X (71) Y (29)
cold-dry X (100) Y (0)
Table 3. The results of the competition experiments started with the same number of the two species of flour
beetles (X) and (Y), respectively, under different climatic conditions [24].
53
Another example of interspecific competition between two closely related species can be
retrieved from American biologist Thomas Park’s experiments from the 1950-60s with flour
beetles. In a series of experiments conducted at various combinations of temperature and
humidity, Park examined the competition between the two species of flour beetles. It was
found that one species always completely suppressed the other species. One species (Tribolium
castaneum) always won in a hot-humid environment while the second species (Tribolium
confusum) always won in a cold-dry environment, see Table 3. However, in an environment
with temperature-humidity lying between the two extremes, there was – depending on the
initial number of individuals at the onset of the experiment – a certain randomness in the
outcome of which of the two species won, see Fig. 28. Elimination of a species due to
interspecific competition with another species has been known as “the competitive exclusion
principle” or “Gause’s principle” that says that “two species with the same ecological niche
cannot coexist”.
Brain power By 2020, wind could provide one-tenth of our planet’s

electricity needs. Already today, SKF’s innovative know-
how is crucial to running a large proportion of the
world’s wind turbines.
Up to 25 % of the generating costs relate to mainte-
nance. These can be reduced dramatically thanks to our
systems for on-line condition monitoring and automatic
lubrication. We help make it more economical to create
cleaner, cheaper energy out of thin air.
By sharing our experience, expertise, and creativity,
industries can boost performance beyond expectations.
Therefore we need the best employees who can
meet this challenge!
The Power of Knowledge Engineering
Plug into The Power of Knowledge Engineering.

Visit us at www.skf.com/knowledge
54
N2 wins
150
N2 (Tribolium castaneum)
120
90
ns
wi
60
N
2
or
30 N1 wins
N
1
30 60 90 120 150 180 210
N1 (Tribolium confusum)
Fig. 28. Competition experiments with two

species of flour beetles (N1 and N2) of the genus
Tribolium. Either N1 or N2 eventually wins,
depending on the initial population sizes, but in
certain combinations there is an “unstable
balance”, which implies that either N1 or N2
eventually winds – i.e. the result is random [33].
2) Fundamental and realized niche is not identical
If two species are not equally well adapted to all the habitats in “the fundamental niche”,
but otherwise exploit the same food resources, they can often co-exist by sharing the niche
between them. The part of “the fundamental niche” which is utilized when there is an
interaction (interspecific competition) with other species organisms is called the “realized
niche”. Based on the patterns of distribution, it has in many cases been documented that
the organisms in nature do not exploit (realize) their entire fundamental niche. A classic
example is the turbellarian worms Planaria montenegrina and Planaria gonocephala that
live in brooks. No individual species live in the whole extent of a brook, but when the
two species occur in the same brook, they share it between themselves: one species occurs
below 14 °C, the second species above this temperature [25].
Another classic example is the distribution of two species of acorn barnacles on Scottish
rocky coasts [26]. One of the barnacle species (Chthamalus) can live from the high-
tide line and downwards, but because of competition from the other barnacle species
(Semibalanus) which do not tolerate drying out at low tide, live usually only in that part
of its fundamental niche which lies in the tidal zone, see Fig. 29.
55
Mean tide levels Fundamental Realised

niches niches
High spring tide
High neap tide
Mean tide
Low neap tide

Low spring tide
Chthamalus
Semibalanus
Fig. 29. Interspecific competition between two species of barnacles,

Chthamalus and Semibalanus that live on rocky shores where they feed
on zooplankton and suspended food particles filtered from the water.
The free-swimming larvae of both species settle over a wide range,
but the adults live in a very precisely defined belt. The limit for
Semibalanus’ upper limit is determined by physical factors, including
drying. Chthamalus is not prevented from living in Semibalanus’ area
due to physical factors, but because of Semibalanus which grows faster
and either push away or overgrow Chthamalus. If Semibalanus is
removed (it has been done by biologists scraping them off), Chthamalus
will spread further down the rock side, i.e. it occupies a larger part of
its fundamental niche [26].
In a series of experiments dealing with competition between the two ciliate species
Paramecium bursaria and Paramecium aurelia grown in centrifuge glass tubes with yeast as
food, Gause demonstrated in 1935, that the ciliates divided the “niche” (centrifuge tubes
with yeast cells) between them, because Paramecium bursaria was found at the bottom of
the centrifuge tubes in which they were living of sedimented yeast cells, while the other
ciliate species swimming in the liquid fed on suspended yeast cells [27]. The culture of
yeast cells were part of both species “fundamental niche”, but each of the species could
only realize a part of this when the other species was present.
56
3) Niche diversification
By niche diversification it is meant that related species living in the same area exhibits a
specialization so as to avoid competing for the same limited resources – i.e. they avoid
niche overlap. Only two examples are cited from the abundant literature on the subject.
A study of the food choices of the great black cormorant (Phalacrocorax carbo) and the
closely related common shag (Phalacrocorax aristotelis) has shown that the two species
have specialized in catching different kinds of fish [28]: the great black cormorant eats
preferably sand eel and herring fish while the common shag eats a mixed feed of flatfish,
shrimps, gobies and other things, see Fig. 30.
Trust and responsibility

NNE and Pharmaplan have joined forces to create – You have to be proactive and open-minded as a
NNE Pharmaplan, the world’s leading engineering newcomer and make it clear to your colleagues what
and consultancy company focused entirely on the you are able to cope. The pharmaceutical field is new
pharma and biotech industries. to me. But busy as they are, most of my colleagues
find the time to teach me, and they also trust me.
Inés Aréizaga Esteva (Spain), 25 years old Even though it was a bit hard at first, I can feel over
Education: Chemical Engineer time that I am beginning to be taken seriously and
that my contribution is appreciated.
NNE Pharmaplan is the world’s leading engineering and consultancy company

focused entirely on the pharma and biotech industries. We employ more than
1500 people worldwide and offer global reach and local knowledge along with
our all-encompassing list of services. nnepharmaplan.com
57
Common shag Black cormorant
Sand eel
Herring
Flatfish
Shrimp
Wrasse
Goby
Other fish
0 10 20 30 40 50 % 10 20 30 40 50 % of diet
Fig. 30. The food choice of two cormorant species: the common shag (Phalacrocorax aristotelis,
left) and the great black cormorant (Phalacrocorax carbo). The two related cormorant species
are often observed at the same sites during the breeding season, but even if the habitat is the
same, the food choice is differently. Hence the two species have different niches, and the two
cormorant species do not directly compete with one another [28].
Three species that belong to the same genus of parasitic wasps live in the same area where
their larvae feed parasitically on the same wood boring larval species that can only lay eggs
in the “host” when their organ used for laying eggs (ovipositor) is fully inserted. Because
the wood-boring larvae are found at different depths in the tree trunks, the parasitic
wasps have specialized in boring larvae that live at different depths. The three parasitic
wasp species have developed significantly different length of ovipositors to avoid direct
competition [29].
4) Character displacement
When two related species geographically overlap each other, they tend to deviate from
each other in their form and construction (morphological) and there is less variation
within the species than in those cases where the species live apart from each other. This
phenomenon is called character displacement and can be considered as an illustration of the
phenomenon when interspecific competition has forced the species to niche diversification,
i.e. to share the niche between them.
58
A known example is Darwin’s finches on the Galapagos Islands. On islands where the
species occur together, the height of their beaks significantly deviates from each other while
on islands where the finches occur separately, the beak height can overlap [30], see Fig. 31.
%
Abingdon, 50
Bindloe,
James,
Jervis 0
50
Charles,
Chatham
0
40 Ground finches:
Daphne
small
0
40 medium
Crossmans large
0
8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22
Height of beak (mm)
Fig. 31. Height of beak in three species of ground-finches (Geospiza sp.) on the Galapagos
Islands. The measurements of the beak-height are depicted horizontally and the percentage
of individuals of each species is shown vertically. At Daphne and Crossmans, both of which are
very small islands, there is only one species of finches. These species have beak-heights that
lie between those found in small and medium sized finches on the larger islands. It is assumed
that the finches have descended from a single species, which at one time or another came to
the outlying islands from South America. As there was no other closely related species, the
finches specialized, and when Darwin visited the islands in 1835, he was captivated by seeing
how the finches had exploited ecological niches that were normally filled by other types of birds.
4.1.2.2 Predation
There is a gradual transition of possibilities for interaction between a predator and its
prey: 1) the predator limits the prey so much that the population of prey becomes extinct
or nearly eradicated, 2) the predator regulates the stock so that the prey population does
not become so large that the food resources are destroyed (overgrazed), 3) the predator is
neither highly regulating or limiting. An example of predator being highly limiting for a
prey population can be found in Canada, where the snowshoe hare is pursued by the lynx.
If the population of snowshoe hare is growing because of particularly favourable conditions,
this subsequently leads to such a strong increase in the population of lynxes that it can
reduce the population of snowshoe hare to near extinction [31]. This gives rise to violent
fluctuations of both species populations, see Fig. 32.
59
160
140 Snowshoe hare
120 Lynx
Number (x103) 100
80
60
40
20
1845 1855 1865 1875 1885 1895 1905 1915 1925 1935
Year
Fig. 32. Changes in the number of snowshoe hare (prey) and lynx (predator) in the years 1845
to 1935, determined as the number of furs received by the Hudson’s Bay Company [31].
This e-book
is made with SETASIGN
SetaPDF
PDF components for PHP developers
www.setasign.com
60
A predator has often a positive regulatory influence on a prey population by maintaining

it at a level that does not exceed the area’s carrying capacity. A classic example should be
mentioned [32]: In Kaibab National Forest, Arizona, a campaign was started in 1907 to
eliminate predators (mountain lions, wolves) because they pursued the deer. After 1910 the
deer population began to grow rapidly, which had otherwise remained constant at around
4,000 animals. Eight years later, the deer population burst and grew to about 30,000
individuals. In the mid-summer of 1924 the population was estimated at 100,000 individuals.
But the winter in Kaibab National Park was long and hard in both 1924 and 1925 with
a lot of snow and low temperatures. During the two long winters 50,000 deer starved to
death. As a result of the overpopulation and the destruction of grazing opportunities, the
deer population continued to decline in the following years. The area could now only carry
a deer population smaller than when the population was kept down by the predators.
In nature, it is rare that a predator (or parasite) exploits its prey so much that the existence
of the population is threatened. It is usually only when two species that are not adapted to
each other are brought together, that you see examples of extinction, cf. Fig. 33.
A
500 Host
Parasite
400
300
200
Population density
100
500 B
400
300
200
100
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Weeks
Fig. 33. “Host-parasite relationship” between the house fly and a

parasitoid wasp under laboratory conditions in newly established
conditions (A) and in a two-year-old host-parasite relationship (B) [1].
In the newly established conditions, the parasite is nearly eliminating
the “host” after 40 weeks and the population densities fluctuate
strongly, in contrast to the small fluctuations in population densities
in the two year old host-parasite relationship, where the species have
adapted to each other.
61
However, it is worth noting that predation is not a one-way interaction. The existence of
predation results in the selective development of an often effective prey defence mechanism.
Many defence mechanisms are behavioural. Some herd animals defend themselves from
attack by a predator, for example, by lumping together with the largest and strongest males
forming in front, against the attacker. Other defences are camouflage (e.g. fish, which adjusts
the colour on the surroundings, and butterflies where the colour coincides with tree bark
or leaves), toxic compounds (many insects and plants avoid being eaten because they are
toxic) and physical defences (many animals and plants have prickly needles, etc.). Finally,
it can be mentioned that many “harmless” animals use other poisonous species’ “warning
colouring” (mimicry).
4.1.2.3 Keystone species

Keystone species are in contrast to the dominant species not necessarily abundant in a
community. They exert strong control over the community structure, not by number but
by their key ecological niches. One way to identify a keystone species is to experimentally
remove or eliminate the species so that its importance becomes enhanced. Here are a couple
of examples on how a keystone species can help to increase diversity.
In a classic experiment, Robert Paine removed the starfish Pisaster ochraceus from an area on
the rocks in the intertidal zone and subsequently examined the effect on species diversity
[39]. This starfish, which is not very numerous, lives on the mussel, Mytilus californianus.
In the absence of starfish, Paine observed that the species diversity went steeply down since
the mussel gradually spread and eliminated the majority of other species. The experiment
shows that Pisaster is a keystone predator, which exerts great influence on the number of
species, although it is not abundant.
On the west coast of Alaska, the sea otter, Enhydra lutris, lives on the sea urchin, Strongylocentrotus
polyacanthus, which again mainly feed on seaweed (macroalgae), dominated by the genera
Laminaria and Agarum. In areas with many otters, urchins are rare and forests of seaweed
are therefore well-developed. Conversely, in areas with few sea otters, there are many sea
urchins and therefore seaweed is absent [43]. In the years between 1987 and 1997 it was
observed that the orca Orcinus orca had begun to predate on sea otters, due to a reduction
in the orca’s usual prey. The result was that the population of sea otters went significantly
down in large areas along the west coast of Alaska. This loss of a keystone predator allowed
the sea urchin population to increase, resulting in a pronounced reduction and loss of
seaweed forests [44].
62
Finally it can be mentioned that some organisms may exert a significant influence on a
community, not through their trophic interactions, but by causing physical changes in the
environment. Species that can dramatically alter the physical environment on a big scale
are called “ecosystem engineers”. A well-known representative is the beaver, which by wood
cutting and building of dams, can transform large areas of forest to flooded marshland.
4.1.2.4 Invasive species

An invasive species is a plant or an animal that has been spread by human action over large
geographical distances to a new area. This new species reproduce unrestrained and out of
control due to not having any natural enemies, thereby out-competing the native species.
In recent years, problems with invasive species have been increasing. This is primarily due
to increasing global transportation, for example, man has also deliberately introduced many
species to agriculture, forestry, horticulture and aquaculture. Some of these species, however,
have later spread to the countryside and become invasive species.
63
But also shipping between different parts of the world contributes to spreading of invasive
species. The comb jelly or sea walnut, ctenophore Mnemiopsis leidyi, lives naturally off the
US East Coast, but from ballast water from ships, it has now found its way to Europe and
Asia. The ctenophore lives mainly on zooplankton. During the late 1980s in the Black Sea,
there was a mass occurrence of this invasive ctenophore resulting in a drastic reduction
of zooplankton. Since zooplankton is also the food for anchovy and sprat, which in turn
are food for larger fish higher up the food chain (mackerel, tuna), this resulted in a total
collapse of the Black Sea fisheries [45]. In 2006, the ctenophore was observed for the first
time along the Dutch coast where it had probably been transported with ballast water from
large cargo ships. In the following years, the invasive ctenophore spread with the northbound
currents and since 2007, it is has been observed in mass occurrence in Danish and other
Scandinavian waters [51].
4.1.2.5 Symbiosis
Two species’ populations can be linked together in a cohabitation called symbiosis. Symbiosis
may be beneficial for one or both species. Therefore it is common practice to distinguish
between two main types of symbiosis, namely commensalism and mutualism. Commensalism
is a form of partnership where one species (“the guest”) is given food, shelter, transportation
etc., without demonstrable disadvantages or advantages to “the host”. Mutualism is a form
of cohabitation, which implies that both parties benefit from the partnership. There are
countless examples of mutualism in nature. Here are just a few examples:
a) Lichens are “double creatures” consisting of a fungus and an algal species. The algae
produce photosynthetic products that the fungi make use of. In return, the fungi
provide water and inorganic minerals to the algae.
b) Ruminants are totally dependent on cellulose degrading bacteria in the rumen because
they cannot produce enzymes that break down the cellulose in plant cell walls.
c) Most living plants are angiosperms, flowering plants, that require pollination by
animals (insects, birds) flying from flower to flower, while the animals benefit from
the plant nectar or pollen. Animals also play an important role by spreading plant
seeds and fruits. Many small forest plant seeds are spread by ants, due to the seeds
are equipped with a small organ (elaiosom) with nutritious ant food. Some birds
spread seed kernels by passing the seed through their gut, resulting in a convenient
dropping of fertilizer ready to sprout. This well-known example of partnership
benefits both parties.
64
d) Root infections by nitrogen fixing bacteria and fungi are widespread in nature.
Examples are nodule bacteria (Rhizobium) in sweet peas and similar bacteria included
under actinomycetes in alder, buckthorn and other trees that provide nourishment
for the bacteria, while they in turn benefit from the nitrogen compounds that the
nitrogen fixing bacteria produce.
e) Many forms of mutualism are not very conspicuous. For example, many aquatic
animals have unicellular algae in their cells. One of the best studied examples is
the ciliate Paramecium bursaria which is filled with single-celled green algae when
it is in light. In light, the ciliate can only utilize inorganic nutrients, but in the
dark (without the algal cells’ photosynthesis) the animal requires organic matter.
f ) There are many indications that mitochondria and chloroplasts were originally
symbiotic oxygen breathing bacteria and blue-green photosynthetic bacteria,
respectively. They were amoeba-like cells, which during prehistoric times developed
into animal and plant cells (“the endosymbiosis theory”).
4.1.3 IMPORTANCE OF INTRASPECIFIC FACTORS FOR THE REGULATION

OF POPULATIONS
Many biotic factors that help to regulate the densities of populations are intraspecific. These
factors are never completely separated from interspecific- and abiotic factors, but together
these intraspecific factors may ensure the stability of a population. Intraspecific factors can
be passive (e.g. competition between a plant population’s individuals) or active (e.g. social
organization within a population).
Competition for limited resources between a species’ individuals is a common feature of

all populations. The clearest examples of intraspecific competition can be obtained from
the plant kingdom due to plants not masking competition with social mechanisms. Two
examples that demonstrate this are: 1) In a beech forest the big trees overshadow the small
beech trees in the undergrowth. The growth here is therefore very slow. However, if an
old tree falls over in a storm resulting in plenty of light coming down to the forest floor,
the small beech trees begin to grow rapidly. But only the fastest growing tree will replace
the fallen tree because the other more slowly growing trees will eventually be outmatched
by shading. 2) The woody plants in the arid (dry) and semi-arid regions can compete so
aggressively for the sparse amount of water that they form a dispersed but very regular
distribution of plants. This distribution is is determined by the extensive root system of
the individual plant. When a plant has first established a root system, it will outcompete
all other plants within its root zone.
65
Many animals mark out a certain area (territory) for their activities (foraging, mating, nesting,
etc.). This territory is defended aggressively or more peacefully with signals (odours, sounds,
threatening postures etc.) against intruding individuals of the same species. This territoriality
is an expression of intraspecific competition. At low population densities there are enough
optimal territories for all, and territory defence has no effect on the reproductive success.
At moderate population densities, there are not enough optimal territories for everyone
and some individuals are forced out into “marginal territories”. At even higher population
densities, there is a need for even marginal territories and some individuals become “floaters”
without any territory. These individuals’ reproductive success is very small, but “floaters” act
as the population’s buffer, by taking over territories that become empty due to death of the
territory owner. When a population’s density is approaching the area’s ability to feed the
population, the number of “floaters” with poor reproductive success and scanty territory
assertive behaviour decrease, and in this way the population regulates itself. For example,
studies of the reproduction speed of great tits have shown that there is a clear decline in
the number of nestlings per couple with increasing population density. The number of
nestlings per couple can thus be reduced from 16 young birds per year when there is a
population density of 1 pair per 10 ha to only 6 young birds per couple when there are
16 pairs per 10 ha.
Sharp Minds - Bright Ideas!

Employees at FOSS Analytical A/S are living proof of the company value - First - using The Family owned FOSS group is
new inventions to make dedicated solutions for our customers. With sharp minds and the world leader as supplier of
cross functional teamwork, we constantly strive to develop new unique products - dedicated, high-tech analytical
Would you like to join our team? solutions which measure and
control the quality and produc-
FOSS works diligently with innovation and development as basis for its growth. It is tion of agricultural, food, phar-
reflected in the fact that more than 200 of the 1200 employees in FOSS work with Re- maceutical and chemical produ-
search & Development in Scandinavia and USA. Engineers at FOSS work in production, cts. Main activities are initiated
development and marketing, within a wide range of different fields, i.e. Chemistry, from Denmark, Sweden and USA
Electronics, Mechanics, Software, Optics, Microbiology, Chemometrics. with headquarters domiciled in
Hillerød, DK. The products are
We offer marketed globally by 23 sales
A challenging job in an international and innovative company that is leading in its field. You will get the companies and an extensive net
opportunity to work with the most advanced technology together with highly skilled colleagues. of distributors. In line with
the corevalue to be ‘First’, the
Read more about FOSS at www.foss.dk - or go directly to our student site www.foss.dk/sharpminds where
company intends to expand
you can learn more about your possibilities of working together with us on projects, your thesis etc.
its market position.
Dedicated Analytical Solutions

FOSS
Slangerupgade 69
3400 Hillerød
Tel. +45 70103370
www.foss.dk
66
Defending of territories can also help to regulate a population by forcing “floaters” to search
for territories in new areas. Studies have shown that the number of deer in a forest is kept
constant by territory defending behaviour that forces the excess deer without a territory to
emigrate. In this way, intraspecific competition can also affect the spreading of a species [34].
4.2 POPULATION GROWTH AND MATHEMATICAL MODELS

If the number of births per individual and per unit time (birth rate = natality) is called
x, and the number of deaths per individual and per unit time (mortality) is called y, the
specific growth rate is defined as: r = x – y. If a population has N individuals, the population
specific growth rate can be described by the equation:
r = (1/N)dN/dt (I)
The unit of r is time-1, and it is noted that the population growth rate, dN/dt, is proportional
to the size of the population, N. If r is constant, the growth is said to be exponential. If
r is positive then the population increases in size (positive growth); if r is negative, then
the size of the population is decreasing (negative growth), and if r = 0, then N is constant
(zero growth).
The differential equation can be solved by separation of the variables:
∫(1/N)dN = ∫rdt
and
lnN = rt + c
If N = N0 for t = 0, then c = lnN0, and
lnN = rt + lnN0
ln(N/N0) = rt
N/N0 = ert
or
N = N0ert(II)
where N is the population size at a given time t, and N0 is the population size at time t = 0.
If you insert a theoretical value of the specific growth rate in this equation (e.g. r = 1.15)
and plot the number of individuals (N) as a function of time (t) in an arithmetic plot, the
result is a J-shaped curve pattern, see Fig. 34A. But if you choose to plot N as a function
of time in a semi-natural logarithmic (semi-ln) plot, a linear line with slope r is obtained,
because lnN = lnN0 + rt, see Fig. 34B.
67
1000
A B
N = N0ert InN = InN0+ rt
lnN
500
Number of individuals (N)
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 0 2 4 6 8 10 12
1000
N = K/(1+ea-rt) K
C D
a = In((K-N0)/N0)
K
lnN
500
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 0 2 4 6 8 10 12
Time (t)
Fig. 34. Growth of two theoretical organisms where one grows exponentially (A) while the other
displays “sigmoid” growth (C). The arithmetic plots to the left (A & C) are comparable to the semi-
logarithmic plots to the right of (B & D). r = (unlimited) specific growth rate, K = carrying capacity.
The examples are based on one individual at t = 0.
The doubling of time (t2) for a population exhibiting exponential growth is obtained by
inserting N = 2N0 in the growth equation (II) which gives 2 = ert2 or:
t2 = ln2/r = 0.693/r (III)
If the exponential growth is negative (by analogy with the decay of radioactive substances),
the population is reduced by half at regular time intervals: t0.5 = ln0.5/r.
Growth in one period of time is: Nt+1/Nt = er. For example, if the growth is expressed by
periodical increments in percentage, then: er = 1 + rper or r = ln (rper + 1), where rper is called
the periodic specific growth (= percentage growth/100). Since rper = er – 1, it follows that:
N = N0ert = N0(1 + rper)t(IV)
68
For small values, the specific growth (r) and the period specific growth (rper) are almost equal:
r = 0.02 implies that rper = 1.01r. For populations the concepts of generation time can be
introduced: tg = the average difference between the date of birth of the offspring and the
parents, and net reproduction; R0 = the number of offspring each individual on average
produces (= number of new individuals per individual). Therefore, from equation (II) it will:
R0 = ertg(V)
In the previous section, it was shown how the growth of a population can be described
mathematically, if the specific growth rate (r) is constant. But is the population specific
growth rate ever constant? Fig. 35 shows the growth of a ciliate kept in the laboratory at
different temperatures, and this experiment confirms that a population can in fact have a
constant r value and thus increase exponentially. But it is clear that the exponential growth
cannot continue indefinitely; resources will eventually be exhausted and the growth will stop.
Challenge the way we run
EXPERIENCE THE POWER OF

FULL ENGAGEMENT…
RUN FASTER.
RUN LONGER.. READ MORE & PRE-ORDER TODAY
RUN EASIER… WWW.GAITEYE.COM
1349906_A6_4+0.indd 1 22-08-2014 12:56:57
69
20 °C
12 °C
4 °C
Number of individuals
100
10
0 °C
1
0 100 200 300
Hours
Fig. 35. Population growth in the ciliate Uronema

marina at different temperatures. The population
growth is exponential due to the number of
individuals over time being described by a straight
line in the semi-logarithmic plot. The slope of each
line expresses the specific growth rate (r) at the
specified temperature [64].
All populations will grow exponentially under constant conditions, but usually growth is
inhibited before all resources are exhausted, so growth is only exponential in the beginning.
However, there may be examples from nature where the growth is exponential until food
becomes limiting. Populations which grow exponentially are characterized by being unstable
and highly volatile (infestations and bacterial growth).
Many populations inhibit their own growth when their sizes approach the carrying capacity
of the area. The inhibition takes place through a so-called negative feedback, dN/dt, which
reduces the growth rate of the population more and more as the number of individuals
approach the carrying capacity, K. This can be expressed by modifying the equation for
the unrestrained exponential growth with the function f(N). Small values of N (N << K)
assumes values near
1 (almost exponential growth); but as N approaches K the function
f(N) goes towards 0 (zero): dN/dt = rNf(N) (r = maximum unlimited initial growth rate).
The requested function f(N) can be expressed by the size (K – N)/K, which has values
close to 1 for N << K and approaching 0 for N going towards K. The differential equation
thus becomes:
dN/dt = rN(K – N)/K (VI)
70
The growth model is called “the logistic model” or “the Pearl-Verhulst model” after its
two (independent) developers. It is immediately seen that (K – N)/K is an expression of
the number of “seats” that, at any time, are left over in relation to the maximum possible
number of “seats”, namely the carrying capacity (K). By integration (not to be shown here;
see e.g. reference [59]) the logistic growth equation is obtained:
N = K/(1 + e[a-rt])(VII)
where a = ln [(K – N0)/N0].
The number of individuals (N) versus time in an arithmetic plot describes an S-shaped
(“sigmoid”) curve, see Fig. 34C. It can be seen that the population growth is (almost)
exponential for small values of N, and that N with time approaches asymptotically to K.
The growth rate of the population is maximal when the population density is half of the
carrying capacity (the sigmoid curve’s tangent line). The optimum yield (dN/dt)opt that can
be obtained from the population is determined by inserting N = K/2 in the expression:
(dN/dt)opt = rN(1- N/K) = r(K/2)(l -1/2) = rK/4 (VIII).
If for example a fish population follows the logistic model, then the fish population will
be overfished (i.e. the population is driven towards extinction) if the yield is larger than
rK/4. If less is being fished, the maximum yield is not obtained. The simple rule of “half
the carrying capacity” is based strictly on the logistic growth model. Populations with more
complex, non-linear relationships between specific growth rate and population density will
have different points of optimum yields, for example (1/3)K, or (3/4)K.
In Fig. 34 there has been made a comparison between sigmoid and exponential growth, partly
in an arithmetic plot, partly in a semi-log plot. It is noted that the curves coincide at the
beginning. In the semi-logarithmic plot, the sigmoid growth curve approaches asymptotically
to K (Fig. 34D), whereas the exponential growth curve is linear with time (Fig. 34B). The
logistic growth model shows the relationship between the elements, all of which can be
ascribed a biological meaning. But the model has so many significant simplifications, that it
cannot be expected to give a realistic picture even in relatively simple situations. Thus, the
model does not taken into account: 1) the age structure of the population, 2) the minimum
size of the population for survival, 3) social animals have a minimal density, 4) changes
in the environment are not immediately reflected in a changed population growth rate,
5) competition with other species’ populations, 6) it is unreasonable simply to assume that
the specific growth rate decreases linearly with population density, see Fig. 36.
71
2
rm
Specific growth rate = (1/N)dN/dt

4
Population density (N) K
Fig. 36. Possible relationships between a population’s specific growth rate and
its density. Curve no. 1 shows the hypothetical line for a population which has a
specific growth rate (1/N)dN/dt = rm(1 – N/K), where rm = the maximum specific
growth rate, which decreases linearly as a function of population density (N) (one
of the prerequisites of the logistic growth equation). Curve no. 2 shows the specific
growth rate in a population that has a density-independent growth, and hence is
growing exponentially. Curve no. 3 shows a form which is often found in a density-
dependent, self-regulating population. Curve no. 4 shows the specific growth rate
in a population that has a maximum growth rate at a medium population density.
The Wake
the only emission we want to leave behind
.QYURGGF'PIKPGU/GFKWOURGGF'PIKPGU6WTDQEJCTIGTU2TQRGNNGTU2TQRWNUKQP2CEMCIGU2TKOG5GTX
6JGFGUKIPQHGEQHTKGPFN[OCTKPGRQYGTCPFRTQRWNUKQPUQNWVKQPUKUETWEKCNHQT/#0&KGUGN6WTDQ
2QYGTEQORGVGPEKGUCTGQHHGTGFYKVJVJGYQTNFoUNCTIGUVGPIKPGRTQITCOOGsJCXKPIQWVRWVUURCPPKPI
HTQOVQM9RGTGPIKPG)GVWRHTQPV
(KPFQWVOQTGCVYYYOCPFKGUGNVWTDQEQO
72
In spite of these objections, the logistic model has frequently been fitted to experimental data
from both laboratory and field studies. The reason for this is that the model is simple, that
the used terms can be attributed biological meaning, and that there is often a surprisingly
good agreement with the experimental data. In Fig. 37, the logistic growth model is used
to describe the sigmoid growth of a population of yeast cells. The concept of “negative
feedback” covers different conditions increasingly inhibiting the growth of the population
when its density increases. In the case of yeast cells (see Figs. 37 & 38), the inhibition is
caused by the yeast cells’ production of harmful substances (including alcohol).
750
K
Number of yeast cells per μl
600
450
300
150
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Hours
Fig. 37. The growth of yeast cells in a culture is self-limiting,

since the “negative feedback” or “ambient resistance” is
linearly proportional to the density of yeast cells. In the figure,
the logistic growth model is used to describe the yeast
population’s “sigmoidal growth” in an arithmetic plot [1].
73
1000
K
500
Number of yeast cells per μl

100
10
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Hours
Fig. 38. The same data for the growth of yeast cells
in culture, as shown in Fig. 37 but depicted in a
semi-log plot. An exponential curve that describes
the growth of the yeast culture during the first 4
hours has been plotted to illustrate how the growth
would be if there was no “negative feedback”. The
area between the two curves, and the line for the
carrying capacity (K), can be perceived as a
quantitative expression of the “ambient resistance”.
In larger animals, such as feral sheep (see Fig. 39), the negative feedback is caused by food
scarcity due to an increasing degree of overgrazing as the population approaches the area’s
carrying capacity. In territory defending animals, negative feedback is often caused by reduced
reproductive success of individuals without a territory. If the exponentially growing human
population in many developing countries should be lowered, it is a widespread assumption
that a negative feedback is needed in the form of social and material goods for families
with few children.
74
Number of individuals (x103)

2000
1000
1820 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 1900 10 20 30
Year
Fig. 39. Around year 1800, sheep were released into the wild on the island of Tasmania, south
of Australia, and for a period of more than 100 years, there exist reasonably good countings of
the sheep population [35]. In the new environment, with temporary unlimited food resources, the
sheep population grew exponentially at the beginning, but because of the delay in the feed-back
mechanism for the self-regulating population and consequent overgrazing, the stock began to
decline, followed by a series of “damped oscillations” around the carrying capacity of about
1,700,000 sheep. The plotted curve is based on the logistic growth equation (VII) fitted to the
dots showing data for the individual countings [7]. The increase in population size after 1925 can
be attributed to better living conditions due to cultivation of land.
Month 16
I was
the North Sea super
advising and the No
Real work he
International
al opportunities
Internationa
�ree wo
work
Real work he
helping fo
International
�ree wo
work
75
Independently of each other, the American mathematician, physical chemist and statistician
Alfred J. Lotka and the Italian mathematician Pierre F. Volterra in the mid-1920s, generated
a set of differential equations to describe the growth of two species’ populations that compete
for the same food resource, and similar equations for two species of which one species is
the other species’ prey [36, 37]. The equations have been known as “the Lotka-Volterra
equations” and are briefly presented below.
First we discuss a growth model that takes into account the competition between two species
competing for the same limited resource (i.e. “the competitive exclusion principle”). Each
species’ population will be limited not only by its own individuals but also by the growth
of the other species. If the two species’ populations are called N1 and N2, the following
growth equations for the two species can be established:
dN1/dt = r1N1(K1 – N1 – αN2)/K1

and
dN2/dt = r2N2(K2 – N2 – βN1)/K2
where r1 and r2 are the two species’ (unlimited) specific growth rates, K1 and K2 are the two
species’ carrying capacity when each of the species live alone, and α (alpha) and β (beta)
are conversion factors so that N1’s and N2’s inhibitory effects on each other can be made
equivalent to a corresponding number of individuals of the same species that “inhibit itself ”.
For example is αN2 = inhibitory competitive effect of species 2 on species 1. It can thus
be seen that α/K1 is a measure of how much an individual of species 2 inhibits species 1.
Further it can be inferred that:
β/K1 = 1/K2 or β = K1/K2

and
α/K2 = 1/K1 or α = K2/K1
In the experiments with the ciliates Paramecium aurelia and Paramecium caudatum (see
Fig. 27), it is found that β = 1.64 and α = 0.61. The higher β-value indicates that the
individuals in population N1 have a larger “competition efficiency” and therefore always
will win.
76
The established growth equations for the two species cannot be integrated; but the consequences
of the equations can be realized. N1 is in equilibrium when K1 – N1 – αN2 = 0 and N2
is in equilibrium when K2 – N2 – βN1 = 0. If the equations are graphically depicted in a
coordinate system, where the abscissa is N1 and the ordinate N2, it can be seen from the
points located either above or below the lines of equilibrium that N1 and N2 will either
grow or decrease, i.e., dN1/dt and dN2/dt are either positive or negative. The growth of
the populations can be depicted as vectors, as shown in Fig. 40. If α = 0.6 and β = 1.6,
the outcome of the competition can be graphically assessed and displayed, see Fig. 41. It
appears that N1, which has the highest competitive efficiency, will always win.
N2 N2
K2
K1/α K1 - N1 - αN2 = 0 K2 - N2 - βN1 = 0
dN1/dt <0 dN2/dt <0
dN1/dt >0 N1 dN2/dt >0 N1
K1 K2/ß
N2
K1/α
K2
N1
K2/ß K1
Fig. 40. Graphical solution of the Lotka-Volterra model for two species, N1 and N2,
competing for the same food resource. The shown example is for K2 < K1/α and K1 >
K2/β; the analogous possibility is K2 > K1/α and K1 < K2/β. Another two instances are
when the isoclines for dN/dt = 0 cross each other. In one case this indicates stable
coexistence, but lower population density for both species, the other case that one of
the species is outcompeted, depending on the initial population sizes (cf. Fig. 28)
77
N2
K1/α
150
K1 = 105 K2 = 64
β = 164 α = 0.61
100
K2
50
N1
0 K2/β50 100 K1
Fig. 41. Graphical presentation of the outcome of

the Lotka-Volterra model for interspecific competition
for the same food between the two species of ciliates
(N1 = Paramecium aurelia; N2 = P. caudatum) shown
in Fig. 27. It is seen that N1 always wins, regardless
of the initial population densities.
www.job.oticon.dk
78
In the following we discuss the predator/prey model. In words the model can be described
as follows:
{ The change in the number of prey per unit of time } = { Unlimited growth of prey per unit
of time } – { Extermination of prey per unit of time caused by the predator }
and
{ The change in the number of predators per unit of time } = { The increase in the number
of predators as a result of the change of prey per time unit } – { Deaths among predators per
unit time }
Mathematically, the predator/prey model can be formulated as:
dN1/dt = r1N1 – k1N1N2

and
dN2/dt = k2N1N2 – d2N2
where N1 and N2 are the population size of the prey and the predator, respectively, r1 is
the population growth rate of the prey in the absence of a predator, d2 is the predators’
mortality rate, and k1 and k2 are constants. The model assumes that the consumption of
prey is directly proportional to the size of the two populations, assuming that this is equal
to the probability that a predator and prey meet.
At the equilibrium point where dN1/dt = dN2/dt = 0, this implies that N1 = d2/k2 and N2
= r1/k1. It is seen that N1 increases when N2’s death rate increases, and conversely that N2
increases when N1’s growth rate r1 increases. Use of insecticides has in some cases unexpectedly
led to an increase in the number of pests because the insecticide resulted in an increased
mortality of the predator of the pest organism. Anecdotally it can be mentioned that it
was a similar phenomenon that made Volterra interested in population dynamics: during
World War I, when the fishing effort as a whole went down, he observed an increase in
the percentage of predatory fish at the fish market in Venice.
Although the Lotka-Volterra predator/prey model, in certain situations, is fairly robust,

one must not forget that the model is based on at least three major simplifications: 1) the
population growth rate of the predators is only limited by the population size of the prey,
2) none of the populations are limited by their own density, and 3) the population size
of the predator has no effect on the number of prey caught (no intraspecific competition
between predators).
79
Several attempts have been made to correct for some of the foregoing simplifications. Here
only a single further development of the original Lotka-Volterra equations is mentioned ,
namely the following differential equations:
dN1/dt = N1(r1 – k1N1 – k2N2)

and
dN2/dt = N2(r2 – k2N2/N1)
These equations take into account that the prey population restricts itself (made by introducing
the term k1N1 and that the unlimited growth of the predator population is increasingly
inhibited when the total number of predator to prey organisms (N2/N1) is growing.
In recent years, several books have been published on this subject and they give detailed
outlines of the consequences of the differential equations [37, 38, 60, 61], which are not
mentioned here.
In the following, some examples of the practical use of mathematical growth models are given.
Example 1
A culture of bacteria cells undergoing bifurcation (binary fission) has a constant

generation time, tg. The number of generations after time t is therefore t/tg so that N
= N02t/tg is the number of cells at the time t, and N0 is the initial number of cells. The
concentration of bacteria was measured during the exponential growth phase. Initially it
was measured to be 2 × 104 cells l-1. After 10 hours, the concentration was measured to
be 5.96 × 107 cells l-1. What was the generation time of the bacteria culture?
Answer: N = N02t/rt
5.96 × 107 = 2 × 104 × 210/tg
tg = 0.866 hours
Example 2
A green algal species has a constant generation time, tg, but do not divide in 2 but rather
in 4 cells.
a) Derive an expression for the number of cells after g generations.

Answer: 4g
b) Derive an expression of the population specific growth rate.
Answer: N = N0ert
4 = ert
r = (1/tg) ln4
80
Example 3
A population of algae is growing exponentially. It is observed that after 2 days there are
400 algal cells present, while after 6 days there are 800 algal cells.
a. What is the size of the initial population?

b. If the specific growth rate is constant, what is then the population size after
10 days?
Answer: a) t2 = 6 – 2 = 4 days
r = ln2/t2 = 0.693/4 = 0.173 d-1
N = N0ert = 800 = N0e0.173×6
N = 283
b) N = 283e0.173×10 = 1596
DEDICATED TEACHERS,
WORLD-CLASS
RESEARCH,
CLOSE INDUSTRY
CONNECTIONS.
No tuition fees.
E liu.se/master
‡
81
Example 4
The human population in a city grows with a constant rate of 4% per year. If the
population in 2001 was 100,000, how big will it be in 2017?
Answer: N = N0(1 + rper)t

N = 100,000 (1 + 0.04)16 = 187,298
Example 5
A population of yeast cells grows 48.2% per hour. At time t = 0 the population size is
N0 = 8.34 g biomass (DM = dry matter). During this growth period, the consumption of
glucose is f = 0.345 g per g of biomass (DM) per hour (h). What is the consumption of
glucose, Ft=4-5 from t = 4 to t = 5 h?
Answer: r = ln(1 + rper) = ln1.482 = 0.393 h-1

N = N0ert = 8.34e0.393t g DM
At time t = 0 the instantaneous consumption is F0 = 0.345 × 8.34 = 2.88 g glucose h-1.

Ft=4-5 = ∫54F0ertdt = ∫542.88e0.393tdt = (2.88/0.393) [e0.393t]54 = 17 g glucose.
82
GENERAL ECOLOGY Species diversity
5 SPECIES DIVERSITY
Species diversity is the multiplicity of species. If an area has high species diversity with regards
to butterflies, it is a good locality for a butterfly collector. As a measure of diversity the
number of species per individual can be used. If you collect 100 individuals in a community
and find 50 species, one can say that species diversity is 0.5. If there are 10 species then
the species diversity is only 0.1.
The distribution of species in a community can be very different. There may be approximately
an equal number of individuals of each species, but there may also be a few species with
many individuals and many species with few individuals. The experience shows that natural
communities almost always have a very large number of species, of which only a few are
very common.
When you describe the diversity of a community and want to compare the number of
species with the number of individuals, various diversity indexes may be applied depending
on what you are interested in information on [1, 36]. If you are interested in the dominant
species, you can use a diversity index that weights the most common species in favor of
the more rare. Such an index is, for example, the Simpson index = Σ(ni/N)2 where ni is
the number of specimens of the species i and N is the total number of individuals of all
species. It is seen that rare species, which represents only a small percentage of the total
number of individuals, contribute very little to this because of the squaring.
If you are interested in the more rare species, which empirically are the first to disappear
if an area becomes polluted, you can use an index that favors the rare species. Such an
index is for example the Shannon index = -Σ (ni/N) log(ni/N). It is seen that the smaller
the percentage of the total number of individuals a species constitutes, the relatively more
importance is attached to it (for example: log0.5 = -0.30 and log0.05 = -1.30).
When a plant or animal community is exposed to pollution (eutrophication, toxic substances),

it is characteristic that the diversity falls simultaneously with an increase in the breadth of
the niche of the surviving or newly established species, i.e. the populations of these species
increase (Fig. 42) demonstrates the number of species (S) as a function of the number of
individuals per species (N/S), both in a natural community and in a community exposed
to pollution. It is seen that the total number of species decreases while a few species of the
survivors will have many individuals.
83
60
50
rare species
Number of species (S)
40
30
common species
20
10
0
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 12000
Number of individuals per species (N/S)
Fig. 42. The relationship between the number of species (S) and the number of individuals per
species (N/S). In most natural communities, there is almost always a large number of species of
which only a few are very common. When a community is exposed to pollution, it is characteristic
that the rare species disappear while a few pollution-tolerant (“pollution indicators”) survive and
possibly get a large number of individuals – see dotted curve in the figure.
A number of biological and physical conditions that affect a community’s species diversity
can be pointed out:
INNOVATIVE
LIKE YOU.
84
The physical variation of the environment. Physically diverse (heterogeneous) habitats contain
more niches than physically homogeneous habitats. Therefore, relatively few species are found
in the homogeneous water masses of the oceans compared to the number of species in the
coastal areas where there are varied habitats (stones, rocks, coral reefs etc.).
In total about 1 million plant and animal species are described, but only one-sixth are
living in the sea. The remaining numbers of species live on land. The far greater number
of terrestrial species can be associated with a considerably higher physical heterogeneity on
land. A possible explanation for this phenomenon is that the smaller an animal is, the more
physically heterogeneous the environment appears to be (Fig. 43).
Danish freshwater snails,

50
width in mm - 30 species
40
30 Danish scarabs,
mm - 93 species
20
European carps,
cm - 58 species
Number of species
10 European rodents,
8 cm - 50 species
6
5
4
3
<5 5-10 10-20 20-40 40-80 mm

<20 20-40 40-80 80-160 160-320 cm
Length
Fig. 43. When different groups of animal species are divided into size classes, the result is
that the small species dominate, and that there are only a few large species within each
group of animals [67]. This statement applies when looking at a local community or within a
narrow group of organisms (taxon). But globally, the picture does not fit because there are
for example far more species of insects than of single-celled organisms (protozoans). The
reason for this is that small organisms have a far greater distribution and no local (endemic)
species. A given microorganism will occur when the environment fits it, and for microorganisms
historical (in geological sense) events are not important. Thus, small organisms tend to have
wider or even cosmopolitan distribution, a higher efficiency of dispersal, a lower rate of
geographic speciation (i.e. allopatric speciation), and lower rates of local and global extinction
than do larger organisms which may have endemic species on oceanic islands, mountain
peaks, etc. [79].
85
High/low productivity. In a given ecosystem, there is only a limited amount of energy available;
and the less productive an ecosystem is, the fewer number species can maintain a minimum
population. High productivity is a precondition for high species diversity.
The age of the biotic community. Age, seen from a geological time scale, affects species diversity.
Young ecosystems have lower species diversity than old stable ecosystems. Thus, there are
fewer species in the “young” Baltic Sea than in the “old” Caspian Sea.
Stable/unstable environmental factors. In areas with strong fluctuations in the environment

(salinity, temperature, water level, etc.), there are few species compared to areas with high
stability. For example, only a few species have adapted to the instability in estuaries and
other brackish waters. It is a characteristic of many brackish water species that they have
broad niches. Thus, the bivalve Macoma balthica lives in brackish water at all depths and
in all types of substrates (sand, mud, clay), but if the sea water has a high and constant
salinity, it lives only on sand bottom in very shallow water. Due to interspecific competition
caused by closely related bivalve species, Macoma balthica can only realize a fraction of its
fundamental niche in seawater with constantly high salinity.
Age and stability alone do not explain high species diversity in a community. According to
the so-called “intermediate disturbance hypothesis”, high species diversity is also determined
by a certain frequency of disturbances [58, 63]. In any community, organisms are killed or
damaged by disturbances that occur with varying frequency. In the tropical rain forest, trees
are damaged when they are pushed over in stormy weather or struck by lightning, insect
infestations, landslides etc. Corals are destroyed by storms, freshwater flooding, sedimentation
of mud or large flocks of predators. Small plant and animal communities on larger and smaller
stones in shallow water near the shore are disturbed by storms that relocate the stones. The
smaller the stones are, the more frequent and severe are the degree of disturbance caused
by stormy weather. According to the hypothesis, high species diversity is only maintained
if there is an appropriate frequency of disturbances of intermediate strength, see Fig. 44.
86
High
Diversity
Low
Disturbance frequent rare

Short time after disturbance long time after
Large disturbance small
Fig. 44. High species diversity is, according to the

“intermediate disturbance hypothesis” determined by
frequency, extent, and time after a disturbance of
a community.

678'<)25<2850$67(5©6'(*5((
&KDOPHUV8QLYHUVLW\RI7HFKQRORJ\FRQGXFWVUHVHDUFKDQGHGXFDWLRQLQHQJLQHHU
LQJDQGQDWXUDOVFLHQFHVDUFKLWHFWXUHWHFKQRORJ\UHODWHGPDWKHPDWLFDOVFLHQFHV
DQGQDXWLFDOVFLHQFHV%HKLQGDOOWKDW&KDOPHUVDFFRPSOLVKHVWKHDLPSHUVLVWV
IRUFRQWULEXWLQJWRDVXVWDLQDEOHIXWXUH¤ERWKQDWLRQDOO\DQGJOREDOO\
9LVLWXVRQ&KDOPHUVVHRU1H[W6WRS&KDOPHUVRQIDFHERRN
87
Disturbances interrupt and switch back the competitive elimination process that takes place
during an ecological succession. When species that competitively exclude other species are
removed, the weaker competitors invade the area. Although large geographical areas are
stable in the sense that new species come and old species disappear with imperceptible speed,
disturbances keep local communities in a state of imbalance, which promotes high species
diversity. Gradual climatic changes will also act as disturbance, which helps to maintain
high species diversity. If the frequency of disturbance is reduced, the species diversity
decreases. In the struggle for the limited resources, the most effective species are allowed to
outcompete the weaker species, and the species that are most resilient to disturbances, will
occupy all vacant places and exclude potential immigrants, although these (in the longer
run) are more effective.
Flowering plants Land snails
Labrador 390 Labrador 25
Massachusetts 1650 Massachusetts 100
Florida 2500 Florida 250
Marine mussels Ants
Newfoundland 30 Alaska 7
Cape Hatteras 150 Iowa 73
Florida 200 Trinidad 134
Beetles Coastal fish
Labrador 169 Labrador 25
Massachusetts 2000 Massachusetts 225
Florida 4000 Florida 650
Snakes Breeding birds
Canada 22 Greenland 56
U.S.A. 126 New York 195
Mexico 293 Colombia 1395
Table 4. Number of species in various systematic groups in areas with different climates
(arctic cold temperate, temperate, tropical). Note that the number of species increases
from north to south.
88
The four types of factors discussed above as being important for species diversity, have
collectively led to the existence of a global variation in species diversity. In general, the
diversity of biotic communities increase from the north towards the equator, see Table 4
and Fig. 45. The reasons for this change in diversity towards the equator are:
a) Higher degree of environmental stability from the poles towards the equator, allowing
plants and animals to have a smaller niche width (they are more specialized).
b) A constant production throughout the year at the equator allows a smaller niche
width and greater splitting of resources.
c) The tropical regions have been climatically stable for a long time (since the
Cretaceous period), while the temperate and polar regions have been exposed to
climate fluctuations, particularly during ice ages.
tropical shallow water

100
Number of mussel and
polychaete species
75 deep sea
50 continental shelf
25 tropical estuary temperate shallow

water
temperate estuary
1000 2000 3000

Number of individuals
Fig. 45. The number of bivalve and polychaete species in bottom samples of increasing size
and thus with an increasing number of individuals divided between an increasing number of
species [40]. It is seen that the number of species is highest in the productive tropical shallow
water where a constant high production throughout the year allows narrow widths of niches,
and thus a large number of species in relation to the less productive and more environmentally
unstable temperate shallow water. The species diversity is low in both the tropical and
temperate estuary due to strong fluctuations in salinity, temperature, water level, etc. The
great richness of species in the unproductive deep sea is remarkable. The explanation for this
is that the deep sea has been very environmentally stable for many millions of years, so that
in spite of the very meager food resources, many species have been able to evolve.
89
5.1 TRANSITION ZONES AND EDGE EFFECTS

It is often difficult or impossible to determine where plant and animal communities end and
new ones start. The reason is that they are usually interconnected with an environmental
gradient (temperature, rainfall, water depth, etc.) that causes smooth transitions. If the
environmental gradient between two communities is steep, it is called a “transition zone”.
The communities on either side of a transition zone may be very different, and individuals
of all species from the neighboring communities can invade the transition zone. Although
fluctuations in the environmental conditions allow the species to survive, the transition
zone is constantly being invaded by new individuals as well. In addition to species from
neighboring ecosystems, the transition zone may also contain species that are specially
adapted to this zone. The result is that the transition zone has higher species diversity than
is found in each of the adjacent ecosystems. The ability of a transition zone to be a habitat
for a species that cannot only live in one of the adjacent ecosystems is called the “edge
effect”. An example is the owl, which requires trees for nesting and hiding place, but with
regard to food, it depends entirely on small rodents in the open land.
Striking a match, reconnecting with your family through Skype or over a phone network from Ericsson, refurnishing your
apartment at IKEA or driving safely in your Volvo - none of this would be possible if not for Sweden.
Swedish universities offer over 900 international master’s programmes taught entirely in English.
Don’t just pick a place - pick a future.

>studyinsweden.se
90
5.2 ISLAND BIOGEOGRAPHY

In 1917, the bird fauna was registered on nine islands off southern California. In 1968,
the study was repeated. A comparison of the two studies demonstrated several notable
features, see Table 5. Most notable was that the total number of species on the islands were
almost unchanged over the past 51 years, but from 18% (on the largest island, Santa Cruz)
to 63% (on the smallest island, Santa Barbara) of the species were replaced. On basis of
these and similar types of observations made by the American biologists MacArthur and
Wilson, the so-called “island-biogeography theory”or the “island-biogeographical equilibrium
hypothesis” were established. According to this theory, the number of species on an island
is due to a dynamic balance between immigrations of new species and the extinction of
previously established species [41]. It has been found that small islands (even with the same
biotopes as found on the mainland) have a poorer fauna than can be observed on similar
biotopes on the mainland. The reason should be sought in the fact that all populations
have a certain probability of extinction and that this probability is rapidly increasing with
decreasing population size. On small isolated islands the total number of individuals of a
species is modest and local extinction of the species will occur intermittently, thus leaving
“empty niches”. This phenomenon explains the lower species diversity on small islands (and
other isolated habitats). In line with the lower interspecific competition pressure on small
islands, species living here have extended ecological niches compared to their fellow species
on the mainland, see Fig. 46.
91
Immigration
Extinction
Speed
E
Number of species
Immigration
Extinction
Large Small
Speed
Small
Large
ES EL
Number of species
Fig. 46. (A): The number of immigrations of new species decreases and the number
of endangered species increases as the total number of species on an island
increases. The two processes balance when the island has E species, i.e. there is
a dynamic equilibrium of the species. The steep increase in the number of extinct
species takes place when all the island’s habitats are occupied by reasonably well-
adapted species. (B): The dynamic equilibrium of species is greater on a large island
(EL) than on a small island (ES) when the distance from the mainland is the same.
The above principle has proven not only to apply to real islands, but also for “inverted islands”
in the form of inland lakes and small ponds that are isolated in a “sea” of land. A study
of lakes has shown that the number of species of freshwater snails is directly proportional
to the area of the lakes, that the number of species decrease faster with decreasing size in
nutrient-poor than in eutrophic lakes, and that the remaining snails in the small lakes utilise
a larger part of their fundamental niche compared with their fellow species in larger lakes.
Some snails that are strictly related to rooted aquatic plants in the shore zone of large lakes
can thus be found everywhere in small lakes [42].
92
Familiarity with the island biogeographic principles has great practical importance for nature
conservation. Nature sanctuaries that are surrounded by houses, farms, roads, etc. can be
thought of as a kind of island. A consequence of this is that even if the public authorities
preserve an area in order to sustain a certain fauna, some of the species will sooner or later,
depending on the size of the area, become extinct. Thus, although some Danish moorland
bogs may still be suitable habitats for the black grouse, these bogs are too few and small,
and also too widely dispersed to allow the black grouse in the long term to maintain a
sufficiently large population. As a result it was declared extinct in Denmark in 2001.
Another example is the bell frog, which in 1850 was fairly widespread on the Danish islands.
Today there are only 8–10 small entirely separate populations left, mostly on small islands.
By means of conservation planning, landscaping and new structures, efforts are being made
to ensure the remaining populations from extinction.
Develop the tools we need for Life Science

Masters Degree in Bioinformatics
Bioinformatics is the
exciting ﬁeld where biology,
computer science, and
mathematics meet.
We solve problems from

biology and medicine using
methods and tools from
computer science and
mathematics.
Read more about this and our other international masters degree programmes at www.uu.se/master
93
Island Area Distance 1917 1968 Extinct New Pct. species

(km )
2
from land number number species species replaced
(km) of species of species 1917- 1917- 1917-
1968 1968 1968
C D E F (E+F)/(C+D)
Los Coronados 3 13 11 11 4 4 36
San Nicolas 56 98 11 11 6 6 55
San Clemente 143 78 28 24 9 5 27
Santa Catalina 192 32 30 34 6 10 25
Santa Barbara 3 61 10 6 7 3 63
San Miguel 36 42 11 15 4 8 46
Santa Rosa 215 43 14 25 1 12 33
Santa Cruz 246 30 36 37 6 7 18
Anacapa 3 21 15 14 5 4 31
Table 5. Land and freshwater birds on 9 islands off southern California in 1917 and 1968 [41].
94
GENERAL ECOLOGY Ecological succession
6 ECOLOGICAL SUCCESSION
An ecological succession is a characteristic temporal order in which plant and animal species
replace each other in an ecosystem. A succession can for example be initiated by burning a
forest area or by adding nutrients to a biotope. One can distinguish between two different
models that describe ecological successions:
1) The facilitation model describes ecological successions, where the first pioneer plants
pave the way for the later succession stages that would not have been able to survive
under the pioneer conditions. Examples of facilitation-successions can be obtained
from ecosystems that start on sand, rocks or the like, and where the first succession
stages generate topsoil and other vital conditions (e.g. a favourable microclimate)
for the species that come later during the succession, see Fig. 47.
2) The tolerance model describes ecological successions where the way has previously been
opened for a quick growth of pioneer plants whose existence has been “tolerated”
in the earlier ecosystem in which they had a slow growth in the background. By
shading, the pioneer plants inhibit themselves from reproducing, and other plants
that tolerate shade turn up. If a forest is burned or a cultivated field is abandoned,
fast growing annual and perennial plants will be the first to arrive. After 10–25 years,
shrubs and low trees have suppressed the pioneer plants. After 25–100 years, the
shrubs have been replaced by tall conifers, and the succession will then slowly reach
its “climax” by possibly establishing a mixed forest of conifers and deciduous trees.
vegetation
climate soil time
basic geological
material
Fig. 47. Soil characteristics are determined by the geological starting material (granite,
sandstone, limestone, etc.), climate (wet/dry, cold/hot), the vegetation and the time spent on
soil formation.
95
6.1 AUTOGENOUS SUCCESSION

All ecosystems have a tendency to develop along certain predictable trajectories when under
stable external conditions. An ecological succession is called autogenous if it is allowed to
proceed to climax without any external physical disturbances. A succession where the primary
production is dominating in the beginning is called autotrophic, while a succession where
the respiration is dominating in the beginning is called heterotrophic.
The following is given an example of an autogenous, autotrophic succession: If inorganic

nutrients (e.g. in the form of biologically treated wastewater) is added to an illuminated
aquarium with sea water (with a natural content of living organisms), the following sequence
of events can be observed: There is a rapid proliferation of one or a few species of single-
celled plankton algae that have relatively large outer surfaces which effectively take up the
nutrients. The plankton algae are followed by an increase of “grazers” (copepods, daphnia,
large ciliates), which in turn forms the basis for an increase of predators (rotifers, predatory
daphnia). The increase in primary production gives rise to a production of detritus (dead
algae, dead animals, faeces), which sinks to the bottom where it is decomposed by bacteria
and fungi. The succession in the ecosystem of the illuminated aquarium with seawater is
characterized by:
LIFE SCIENCE IN UMEÅ, SWEDEN

– YOUR CHOICE!
• 32 000 students • world class research • top class teachers
• modern campus • ranked nr 1 in Sweden by international students
• study in English
– Bachelor’s programme in Life Science

– Master’s programme in Chemistry
– Master’s programme in Molecular Biology
APPLY
NOW!
96
1) The concentration of nutrients decreases (i.e. nutrient cycles tend to be “closed”)

with time.
2) Increasing species diversity and increasing complexity (simple food chains in the
beginning followed by a more complex food web).
3) Larger organisms play an increasing role (the biomass increases).
4) The gross primary production (P) decreases in proportion to the biomass (B), i.e.,
P/B-ratio is decreasing because larger organisms play an increasing role.
5) The gross primary production (P) is far greater than the total ecosystem respiration
(R) in the beginning, but it decreases with time so that P = R when the succession
is completed.
If organic matter (e.g. in the form of untreated sewage water) instead of inorganic nutrients
had been added to the above illuminated aquarium with water from a lake enriched with
the succession would have been dominated by respiration in the beginning. The succession
would then have been an example of a so-called autogenous, heterotrophic succession. The
succession process would go as follows, see Fig. 48.
multicellular green algae
green flagellates
blue-green algae
Population density
diatoms
hydra
amoeba daphnia
rotifers
ciliates
colourless flagellates
bacteria
Time
Fig. 48. Heterotrophic succession of freshwater organisms in

an aquarium with freshwater enriched with organic matter [68].
97
There is a strong increase of bacteria that have a high reproductive potential (high r-value)
and are able to utilize the initially high substrate concentrations (bacteria are known as
opportunists). The bacteria form the basis for an increase of bacteria-eating microorganisms
(colourless flagellates and small ciliates). The bacteria-eating flagellates and ciliates form again
basis for an increase of predators (amoebas, rotifers, large ciliates). Because of a progressive
mineralization of the organic matter, this creates the basis for growth of photoautotrophic
organisms (diatoms, blue-green algae, green flagellates). These photoautotrophic planktonic
algae are “grazed” by daphnia, large ciliates and other herbivores. This grazing of plankton
algae leads to growth of multicellular green algae, because these “big” filamentous algae
cannot be eaten by the small herbivores. Finally, the herbivores serve as food for larger
predators (hydra, a sessile freshwater polyp).
Based on the above two examples of autogenous successions, a number of characteristics

can be pointed out of how an ecosystem evolves from a young (juvenile) to a mature
climax ecosystem:
1) Increasing species diversity.

2) Increasing dominance of larger organisms and thus:
-- greater total biomass (B).
-- smaller production (P) per unit biomass (P/B decreasing).
-- essential nutrients are to a higher extend, being bound into living tissue and
thus “closed material cycles”.
3) Increasing degree of stability, as shown by reduced rate of changes in the ecosystem’s
species composition.
4) Development towards such a balance between photoautotrophic and heterotrophic
processes that the gross primary production in the climax stage becomes equal to
the total respiration in the ecosystem, see also Figs. 49 & 50.
5) The rate at which living matter in an ecosystem is theoretically renewed is called
the “turnover rate”, and is calculated as the ratio of the gross primary production
and the ecosystem’s total biomass. It is characteristic that the turnover rate (P/B)
in an ecosystem decreases during a succession. The inverse ratio (B/P) is called the
“turnover time”.
98
Gross primary production (P)
Young Producers NP RP
ecosystem
P>R Consumers RC
NEP
SUCCESSION
Gross primary production (P)
Climax Producers NP RP
ecosystem
P=R Consumers RC
Fig. 49. The gross primary production (P) in a young autotrophic ecosystem is greater than
the total ecosystem respiration = producers respiration (Rp) + the respiration of the consumers
(Rc). In the young ecosystem, all the net primary production is not used for respiration, which
implies that the system has a net production (NEP = net ecosystem production) which
accumulates as organic matter. The accumulation of organic matter (detritus and living
organisms) increases the physical heterogeneity of the ecosystem, and as long as there is
a surplus of organic matter, there are “empty niches”. Therefore, new species come and
carry on the autogenous, autotrophic succession until all the niches are “filled in” and the
whole the gross primary production of the ecosystem is spent on respiration (P = R) [46].
99
100
coral reefs
estuaries
fertile forests
AUTOTROPHIC pastures
10 SUCCESSIONS:
P>R
P, g O2/m2/day
R
=
P
nutrient-rich
lakes
HETEROTROPHIC
1 oceans SUCCESSIONS:
P<R
nutrient-poor
lakes
deserts
0.1 1 10
R, g O2/m /day
2
Fig. 50. In a mature climax ecosystem (on an annual basis) is the gross
primary production of the system (P) = the respiration of the system
(R). Both autotrophic and heterotrophic ecological successions will
develop towards this condition. Ecosystems with high flow through of
energy are placed high on the line P = R, while the opposite is true for
ecosystems with low flow through of energy [47].
The above characteristics of an ecosystem that evolves from a juvenile to a mature system
has by experience been shown to apply to any succession, whether it takes place over a few
days, weeks, months or years. In Fig. 51 is shown the changes in a number of ecological
parameters describing a succession following a forest fire, which proceed over a period of
more than 100 years.
100
P/B
biomass
NEP production
respiration
P D
species diversity
R
B
production/biomass
Pioneer plants Young forest Mature forest
Fire Time Climax
Fig. 51. Changes in different ecological parameters during a succession following a forest fire
[1, 3]. The shaded area between the curve of the gross primary production of the ecosystem (P)
and the total respiration of the ecosystem (R) is equal to the net ecosystem production (NEP),
see also Fig. 49. It is noted that the species diversity (D) reaches a maximum at the time of
invasion of the young forest trees, whereupon the diversity slightly decreases as pioneer species
are eliminated. The biomass (B) rises slightly in the beginning where the plant community is
dominated by herbs and scrub, but it increases as the larger trees grow up.
6.2 K AND R-STRATEGISTS

In the earliest stages of an ecological succession opportunistic, small organisms with a high
reproduction potential (high r-value) are favoured, because these organisms are capable
of utilizing the initially high substrate/nutrient concentrations. These organisms are
called r-strategists. Gradually, as a succession in a community is approaching the climax
ecosystem’s equilibrium community, increasingly larger organisms are favoured because these
have specialized niches, longer and more complex life cycles, good competitiveness, and a
population growth that is characterized by an increasingly inhibited “negative feedback”,
as the area’s carrying capacity (K) is approached. These organisms are called K-strategists.
101
6.3 ALLOGENEIC SUCCESSION

Successions in ecosystems that are caused by changes that come from outside are called
allogeneic. Allogeneic successions take place in ecosystems where the plant and animal
communities are not able to modify the physical environment to any particular degree – for
example in the sea’s free water masses. Here, the growth of phytoplankton and the species
composition are to a large extent controlled by light, temperature and other seasonally
controlled physical conditions, and therefore the “built-in” tendency of an autogenous
succession is disturbed so that a climax stage is never reached. External physical forces can
destabilize an ecosystem, but if the disturbances occur with regularity over a long time, plants
and animals adapt to the conditions, so that an ecosystem is stabilised to a succession stage
between the juvenile and the mature stage. Examples of such “pulse stabilised sub-climax”
ecosystems are tidal estuaries and rice fields.
Click here
to learn more
TAKE THE
RIGHT TRACK Give your career a head start
by studying with us. Experience the advantages
of our collaboration with major companies like
ABB, Volvo and Ericsson!
Apply by World class

www.mdh.se
15 January research
102
6.4 CLIMAX ECOSYSTEMS

If for example Denmark was uninhabited and uncultivated, this temperate country would
(probably) be covered by deciduous forest, which is the climax ecosystem that would develop
under the temperature conditions prevailing today. But looking back in time (using pollen
analysis) on the historical development of the woody vegetation in Denmark, since the Ice
Age, one will see that there have been various climatic stages at different times, depending
on the temperature and thus periods dominated by different deciduous tree-species such as
birch, hazel, fir, lime and beech.
6.5 SUCCESSION IN “SPACE”

The natural autogenous succession that an ecosystem will go through in time, if the external
physical conditions were stable, can often be studied in “space”. The natural succession a
sand dune close to the sea would undergo, if it was not constantly under strong influence of
physical forces (coastal erosion, sand drifting), can be studied in space when walking from
the sandy beach into the hinterland through the “white dune” which is without vegetation
and to the “grey dune” with some plant growth, therefore less affected by sand drifting and
erosion. This implies that the external conditions are relatively stable.
Another example that succession can be studied in “space” is illustrated in Fig. 52, which
shows what happens if a stream is continuously fed wastewater with a high content of
organic matter. By following the flow direction away from wastewater discharges, one can
observe an autogenous, heterotrophic succession in space. If water discharge ceased, one
would in time be able to observe a similar succession in the area near the discharge point.
103
Wastewater
discharge
Direction of stream
bacteria algae
A unicellular animals
oxygen
B
Concentration
ammonium
nitrate
C
phosphate
red polychaetes
chironomid larvae
clean-water fauna
Fig. 52. Zonation (= succession in “space”) in a stream supplied with untreated

wastewater with a high content of organic matter [48]. Close to the discharge point,
the organic matter causes a strong growth of bacteria. The bacterial decomposition
causes a large consumption of oxygen. This may result in oxygen concentrations in
the water being so low that only red worms (Tubifex) and red chironomid larvae
(Chironomus) can live in the waste water community. The large amounts of bacteria
give rise to a subsequent growth of bacteria-eating unicellular animals (protozoans).
As the organic material decomposes, ammonium, phosphate and other nutrients are
released and subsequently utilized by the photosynthetic algae. Further down the
stream, where the water has become more oxygenated, ammonium is converted to
nitrate, while the fauna increasingly resembles that which existed before the discharge.
104
6.6 THE BIOSPHERE AS AN ECOSYSTEM

The development (evolution) of the biosphere, which is the layer of the planet Earth where
life exists, is an interesting example of how there can be an interaction between allogeneic
succession processes caused by climatic/geological changes and autogenous succession
processes which run on due to the activity of the living organisms [1, 49, 50]. The first
living organisms developed on Earth more than 3 billion years ago were probably aquatic
anaerobic bacteria and other heterotrophic unicellular organisms. They lived off of amino acids
that were spontaneously formed due to strong ultraviolet solar radiation in an atmosphere
consisting of nitrogen, hydrogen sulphide, carbon dioxide, methane and water – but not
oxygen. However, this hypothesis of a “primordial soup” presented by John Haldane in 1929
[65], and which was very similar to Aleksander Oparin’s ideas published in 1914, has more
recently been questioned [66]. About 2 billion years ago the first photosynthetic autotrophic
organisms emerged. They produced organic matter from carbon dioxide, water and light
energy with concurrent formation of oxygen. Due to this oxygen production, an ozone
layer was gradually formed in the stratosphere, which greatly reduced the lethal ultraviolet
solar radiation so that life could exist also on land. Oxygen-breathing “grazing” organisms
were gradually developed, but for a long period in the latter half of the Paleozoic Era, the
biosphere’s gross primary production far exceeded the total respiration in the biosphere
ecosystem. This gave rise to a net production of organic matter that accumulated as coal
and oil. Since there were many “empty niches”, many new species could be developed.
They became more and more specialized due to increasing interspecific competition. As the
biosphere’s ecological succession progressed, the atmospheric oxygen and carbon dioxide
content changed resulting in changes in the climate. The climate changes gave rise to
allogeneic succession processes that interacted with autogenous succession processes, which
determined the onward evolution of the biosphere. In the last several millions of years, the
biosphere’s production has approximately been equal to its respiration and the number of
species on Earth (the species diversity) has been roughly constant. The succession of the
biosphere has thus been about to reach its climax until the industrialized world in recent
times started to release large quantities of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere by burning
of coal and oil. These resources were produced in an earlier geological period when the
conditions of life on Earth were completely different from today.
6.7 ECOSYSTEM COMPLEXITY AND STABILITY

The food resources in nature are often found in a “continuum of qualities” (e.g. as a size-
gradient of food particles) [60]. Various animals’ use of a resource-continuum is depicted
in Fig. 53.
105
Utilisation degree
I II III
Resource quality
Fig. 53. Three species’ (I, II, III) exploitation of a resource with a gradient of
qualities (= resource-continuum), such as a size-gradient of food particles [60].
UNIVERSITY WEST
IN SWEDEN
With a University West master’s degree,
you’ll have the opportunity to gain the
skills you need to thrive - as a person
and as a professional.
106
The bell-shaped curves show three species use of resources. It can be seen that each species
has a preferred grade on which it has specialized in exploiting most efficiently. The number
of species that may specialize in utilizing a certain part of such a resource-continuum is
limited by the fact that the specialization determines the width of the niche (narrow niche =
high specialization), the narrower the niche, the less food available to maintain a population.
The specialization implies therefore that the population becomes smaller, which in turn
means that the probability that the species die out becomes larger. The more productive
and climatically stable an area is, the more highly specialized species with small populations
will be able to develop. The tendency of ecosystems to evolve towards greater complexity
and higher species diversity is therefore limited by increased sensitivity to climate change
and other impacts from outside, which implies that the most specialized species die out.
The “stability” of an ecosystem is its ability to withstand external changes (climatic changes,
pollution, etc.) without the ecosystem being significantly affected through loss of species and
immigration of new species. It is still a common misconception – even among biologists – that
complex ecosystems are more “stable” than simple ecosystems. The misunderstanding seems
to depend on the assumption that the more ways food energy can be channeled through an
ecosystem, the more robust is the system against impacts from the outside. However, the
fact is that tropical ecosystems, which have a high degree of complexity and a large variety
of species, because of the very constant environmental conditions in the tropics, have only
a low degree of stability to changes in environmental factors. Conversely, arctic ecosystems
have a high degree of stability against extreme climatic fluctuations due to simpler food
chains with fewer specialist species that can utilize several different food resources depending
on the current situation. Experience also shows that tropical ecosystems are more sensitive
to disturbances than temperate ecosystems, and clearing of tropical rainforests can lead to
irreversible damages.
6.8 ECOSYSTEM MODELS AND LIMITS TO GROWTH

In principle – and sometimes in practice – the energy flow through the various components
of an ecosystem can be quantified by means of mathematical models (using computers).
These models can analytically examine the characteristics of the system based on different
assumptions. One can assess the consequences of intervention in nature, for example
increased fishing or pollution, in order to make rational planning that aims not to destroy
the natural balance of the ecosystem.
107
The book “Limits to Growth”, prepared by an American research group was published in
1972. The book contains the results of a number of model calculations of possible global
developments until 2100. Using mathematical models for the growth of the world population,
food production, consumption of natural resources, industrial production and pollution,
the researchers set up models for global development. The book aroused a fierce debate and
has been the most powerful contribution to the “ecology debate”. It points to a number of
technological measures and growth regulatory interventions. These interventions must be
made if humanity should not run into a disaster caused by an exponentially growing global
population that will lead to lack of resources, which sooner or later will set a definite limit
to further growth. The technical measures that the American researchers identified were
“recycling of resources”, “pollution control”, “increased lifetime of industrial products” and
other concepts that today form part of most people’s consciousness. Further, many other
serious human-induced environmental problems have emerged in recent time and become
part of the political agenda, e.g.: climate changes, loss of tropical rain forests, extinction of
mammals, spreading of invasive species, acidification of the sea.
Open your mind to

new opportunities
With 34,000 students, Linnaeus University is
one of the larger universities in Sweden. We
are a modern university, known for our strong
international profile. Every year more than Bachelor programmes in
2,000 international students from all over the Business & Economics | Computer Science/IT |
world choose to enjoy the friendly atmosphere Design | Mathematics
and active student life at Linnaeus University.
Master programmes in
Welcome to join us! Business & Economics | Behavioural Sciences | Computer
Science/IT | Cultural Studies & Social Sciences | Design |
Mathematics | Natural Sciences | Technology & Engineering
Summer Academy courses
108
GENERAL ECOLOGY Marine ecosystems
7 MARINE ECOSYSTEMS
Oceans cover about 70% of the Earth’s surface, and this is where you find the biggest and
the “thickest” ecosystems in the world. Fig. 54 shows a diagrammatic cross-sectional view
of an ocean adjacent to a continent. It is seen that the continent continues beneath the
ocean as a continental shelf which at a depth of 125–200 m continues in the continental
slope. At a depth of 4–5,000 m the continental slope flattens off and becomes replaced
by the abyssos plain (gr.: abyssos = “bottomless”). The flat abyssos plain is at several places
disturbed by high mountain ridges or deep-sea grooves down to 10,000 m depth.
At all depths in the ocean there are animals living on the bottom, and therefore the sea floor
has been divided into lifestyle zones (habitats) for bottom-dwelling (benthic) organisms: the
littoral zone is the area between high and low water mark (intertidal zone), the sublittoral
zone is the area between the low-water mark and out to the bathyal zone of the continental
slope that continues into the abyssal zone of the deep sea. Likewise, the open waters can
also be divided into several zones: the photic zone is the sun-light exposed surface water,
and the lower boundary of this zone is indicated by the compensation depth, which is the
depth where light intensity is so small that the entire primary production is used for the
phytoplankton’s own respiration. The open sea is called the pelagic zone, while the neritic
zone represents the coastal areas.
Pelagic zone Neritic zone

Photic
zone Littoral
Sublittoral zone
zone
Deep sea ridge ne Shelf
l zo
hya
at
B
Aphotic Abyssal zone
Continental slope
zone
100 -
10,000 m
Deep sea trench
Fig. 54. Diagram of the most important life-zones in an ocean. The boundary between the photic zone and
the aphotic zone is marked by the light-compensation depth – note that it decreases towards the coast
due to a higher content of suspended particles in the water. The oceans are vast sea areas with depths
down to 4–5000 m but with quite isolated, smaller areas with depths of up to 10,000 m. The boundary
between the continents and the oceans is formed by the so-called shelf which has a varying width and
depth. From the shelf, continues the quite steep continental slope down to the ocean bottom.
109
7.1 OPEN SEAS

The food chains in the open sea begin with the microscopic plankton algae, collectively
called phytoplankton. It is phytoplankton’s primary production that forms the basis of all
higher and lower marine life. It is the smallest known autotrophic organisms (diatoms,
dinoflagellates, coccolithophores and others) which fix all the energy used in the entire marine
ecosystem, see Fig. 55. The herbivore grazers in the open marine waters are copepods, krill
and other filtering zooplankton organisms. In the open sea areas, the main representatives
of these filter-feeders are the copepods that for example as prey, provide food for herring
and mackerel. Copepods assimilate about 60–70% of the organic matter in the consumed
plankton algae, while the rest sink to the bottom as “faecal pellets”. This faecal material,
together with descending but not consumed phytoplankton, is the main food supply for
the benthic animals.
In the past four years we have drilled
89,000 km
That’s more than twice around the world.
Who are we?

We are the world’s largest oilfield services company1.
Working globally—often in remote and challenging locations—
we invent, design, engineer, and apply technology to help our
customers find and produce oil and gas safely.
Who are we looking for?

Every year, we need thousands of graduates to begin
dynamic careers in the following domains:
n Engineering, Research and Operations
n Geoscience and Petrotechnical
n Commercial and Business
What will you be?
careers.slb.com
1
Based on Fortune 500 ranking 2011. Copyright © 2015 Schlumberger. All rights reserved.
110
Trophic
level
Photic zone
Coccolitho-
1 Diatoms phorids
Benthic inverte-
2 Copepods Krill brate larvae
Settling
plankton and
detritus
decompose
3 Herring Baleen whale
and release
nutrients
Upwelling
bottom
4 Mackerel Shark water
fertilises
photic zone
with
nutrients
5 Tuna
“Rain” of plankton algae
and detritus to benthic Ray Plaice
animals
Mussel Worm
2
Fig. 55. Food chains and nutrient cycles in the open sea. The schematic presentation of the
classical marine grazing food chains does not, however, take the “microbial loop” into account,
see Fig. 56.
111
A number of benthic animals are also adapted to a filtering life. Typical representatives of
these filter-feeders, or suspension-feeders, are certain mussel species, which have developed
large gills that pump large amounts of water while at the same time, are able to effectively
retain suspended plankton algae. Other mussel species pick up food on the seabed (“selective
deposit-feeders”). Some of the deposited organic material that these animals do not consume
ends in the sediment where it is decomposed by bacteria. The remaining organic material
can also be consumed by bivalves and polychaete worms (“non-selective deposit-feeders”)
that eat the sediment containing bacteria. All of these benthic invertebrates are important
food sources for benthic fish, such as cod, plaice and eel.
In the 1950s it was realized that the open ocean areas, which were previously believed
to be the population of the world’s upcoming inexhaustible larders were “wet deserts”.
Measurement of the primary production using the so-called carbon-14 method, which
measures the uptake of radiolabelled HCO3- in plankton algae in water samples taken at
different depths, have shown that the gross primary production is often less than 500 kcal/
m2/year. This corresponds to the primary production in desert areas on land. Enrichment
experiments where nutrients (ammonia, phosphate, iron or other trace elements) are added
to water samples, have shown that the production in most open sea areas is limited by
nutrients, primarily phosphorus and nitrogen. Only in sea areas where nutrients come to
the surface with ascending bottom water (“upwelling”), are favourable for a high primary
production, as well as a high secondary production of fish.
The perception of the classical grazing food chain, or rather the pelagic food web, has
changed dramatically since the mid-1970s. Until then, bacteria had only been considered as
decomposers of faeces and other organic material deposited on the sea floor. But with the
introduction of new measuring techniques, it became clear that the biomass and activity of
microorganisms in the water column (the pelagial) are significantly larger than previously
thought. Heterotrophic bacteria can utilize up to about 50% of the primary production that
is lost as dissolved organic matter (DOM), and the impact of protozoans is also far greater
than previously thought. Moreover, it has been found that 0.5–2 µm photo-autotrophic
bacteria (cyanobacteria) are important primary producers in many regions of the oceans.
This new knowledge has led to the realisation of a “microbial loop” in which dissolved
organic matter from phytoplankton is utilized by heterotrophic bacteria that are eaten by
zooplankton, whereby a portion of the energy of the “lost” dissolved organic matter from
phytoplankton is channelled back to the classic grazing food chain, see Fig. 56 [60, 62].
112
GRAZING FOOD CHAIN

Plankton algae Zooplankton Fish
(Primary production)
Carbon dioxide (Herbivores) (Carnivores)
Ammonia
Phosphate
DOM
Cyanobacteria
Zooplankton
Bacteria Ciliates
Micro flagellates
“MICROBIAL LOOP”
Fig. 56. The “microbial loop”. A significant proportion (30–50%) of the primary production is lost
from the classical grazing food chain, as dissolved organic matter (DOM). DOM is utilized almost
exclusively by free-living heterotrophic bacteria and therefore gives rise to a significant bacterial
secondary production. The free-living bacteria are eaten by protozoa (flagellates, ciliates), which
in turn are eaten by zooplankton (copepods), whereby the “microbial loop” is coupled to the
grazing food chain. Photosynthetic bacteria (cyanobacteria) also come into the “microbial loop”
when they are eaten by protozoa. Since there is a high turnover in the microbial loop, a large
fraction of the organic matter is mineralized to carbon dioxide, ammonia and phosphate.
The sea can be divided into an autotrophic layer (photic zone) and an underlying heterotrophic
layer (aphotic zone). Because of this vertical division, the inorganic nutrients, which are
incorporated into organic compounds in the photic zone, tend to be transported into the
heterotrophic zone, partly through the food chains and partly by settling of plankton algae
and faeces. The descending algae, dead animals and excrements are decomposed bacterially
whereby essential nutrients (ammonium, phosphate, trace metals, etc.) for phytoplankton are
released. Due to lack of vertical mixing of the water masses, the released nutrients cannot
immediately come back and nourish the phytoplankton in the photic zone.
113
Returning of nutrients to the oceans’ sunlight exposed water masses takes place by means
of ocean currents that collide with a continent whereby the nutrient-rich bottom water is
forced up to the surface. Here, the surface currents carry the nutrient-rich water to the open
oceans photic zones. Sea areas with ascending, old, nutrient-rich bottom water (“upwelling
zones”) are very productive, and it is at such places that the world’s best fishing areas are
found. An example of such an area is the sea off Peru where the Humboldt Current forces
nutrient-rich bottom water up to the surface. The productive fishing areas in the north-
west Atlantic is not caused by “upwelling” but eddies where the Gulf Stream hits the North
Atlantic “threshold”, which “only” has a depth of 500 m.
7.1.1 PRIMARY PRODUCTION AND HYDROGRAPHY
The photic zone reaches down to approximately 100 m in the open ocean areas, but closer
to land it does not penetrate that far down, due to suspended particles. The photic zone
is typically 30–40 m in the more coastal waters. Nevertheless, the primary production is
significantly higher in coastal areas than in the open ocean. This is caused by the nutrients
which are much more limiting for the growth of phytoplankton in open ocean areas. These
have been described as “wet deserts”, see Figs. 55, 57 & 58.
114
Primary production, kcal/m3/day

.01 .05 0.10 0.50 1.00
0
10
20
Coastal waters:
production = 11 kcal/m2/day
30
biomass = 40 kcal/m2
40
Depth, m
50
Open sea:
60 production = 1 kcal/m
2
/day
biomass = 2 kcal/m
2
70
80
90
100
Fig. 57. Vertical distribution of the gross primary production in a coastal area
and in an open sea area in the Northeast Atlantic [1].
1.4
Primary production, g C/m2/day
1.2
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
J F M A M J J A S O N D
Months
Fig. 58. Yearly cycle of the gross primary production in the Northeast Atlantic [52].
115
The vertical distribution of the gross primary production in a coastal and an open area in
the Northeast Atlantic Ocean is shown in Fig. 57. It is noted that the maximum production
takes place in a depth of 10–20 m. This is due to the planktonic algae circulating between
the surface and the thermocline. This makes the algae more or less adapted to darkness
so that they become light inhibited near the surface. The light-compensation depth in
coastal waters is at about 35 m depth but can extend down to 100 m in the open sea.
By integrating the primary production per m3 from the sea surface to the compensation
depth, the total production in the water column can be estimated. In the actual example,
the production in the coastal area estimated to be 11 kcal/m2/day, which is 11 times higher
than in the open sea area (note that production scale is logarithmic). Also the biomass is
higher – 20 times – in the coastal area. This difference between coastal and open sea is
due to a significantly larger amount of nutrients in the coastal areas, which are constantly
supplied with nutrients from the seabed and from land. Fig. 57 indicates the biomass of the
phytoplankton expressed in energy equivalents: 1 kcal = ca. 0.5 g of algal biomass, and this
makes it possible to calculate: 1) the turnover time = biomass/gross primary production, and
2) the turnover rate = gross primary production/biomass. In the coastal area, the turnover
time is around 4 days, and in the open sea area, it is about 2 days.
The annual cycle of the gross primary production in the Northeast Atlantic Ocean is shown
in Fig. 58. The formation of a thermocline in April-May gives rise to a “spring maximum”
in the primary production. Later on, nutrients become limiting for the algal production.
When the seasonal thermocline degrades in the autumn, nutrients return to the photic
zone. This can give rise to a weak “autumn maximum” in the primary production. In late
September through to April, light is the limiting factor for the primary production.
Figure 59 shows the vertical distribution of temperature and pH in the Northeast Atlantic
Ocean. During summer, the upper wind-mixed water masses are warmed by the sun and
this creates a thermocline at a depth of 100–200 m. Below this “seasonal thermocline” is
a “permanent thermocline” which reaches down to a depth of approximately 1000 m. This
temperature stratification prevents that the water masses are vertically mixed from surface to
bottom. The seasonal thermocline causes, however, that the plankton algae are kept mixed
within the photic zone, which results in the formation of a spring maximum in the primary
production, see Fig. 58. The photosynthesis activity in the photic zone causes an increase in
pH (since algae consume CO2), while the bacterial decomposition of organic matter (dead
algae, copepod faeces etc.) that falls from the photic zone, causes a decrease in pH (due to
formation of CO2). From the pH- curve in Fig. 59 it is seen that the microbial degradation
of organic material that falls down from the photic zone is brought to an end before the
material has sunk halfway to the bottom.
116
pH
7.6 7.8 8.0 8.2
0
thermocline
Depth, m 1000
2000
temperature pH
5000
0 5 10 15 20
Temperature, ºC
Fig. 59. The vertical distribution of temperature and pH in the

Northeast Atlantic [52].
INNOVATIVE
LIKE YOU.
117
The upper water masses in the northern hemisphere are heated by the sun in spring (April-
May) and a thermocline is formed between a warmer surface layer and a cooler (and heavier)
bottom layer, see Fig. 59. This stratification of the water column prevents mixing that could
provide a supply of nutrients from the underlying more nutrient rich water masses. The
depth of the thermocline is largely determined by wind mixing which stabilizes the water
masses. This implies that the phytoplankton remains in the photic zone where a “spring
maximum” in the primary production is seen soon after the formation of the thermocline.
The primary production becomes reduced when the nutrients are used up; therefore in the
summer there is a minimum in the primary production.
In the autumn, when the water masses near the sea surface are cooled, the thermocline
disappears and the wind mixes the water. The supply of nutrient-rich underlying water to
the surface often causes a more or less pronounced “autumn maximum” in the primary
production, which soon after begins to decrease because the light intensity and day length
decreases. The light becomes the limiting factor for the primary production, see Fig. 58.
7.2 MARINE SHALLOW WATER AREAS

The main primary producers in protected marine shallow water areas are macroalgae,
higher plants (eelgrass, seagrass) and microscopic diatoms (living on the surface of the sea
floor). In the summer months, these areas are very productive. Macroalgae and eelgrass are
negligibly being eaten, but they enter indirectly into the area’s food chains. During winter, the
macroalgae and eelgrass are being decomposed and mixed into the sediment. This input of
organic matter gives rise to a rich production of bacteria and small organisms-eating bacteria
(e.g. ciliates) in the sediment. In food chains, the so-called “browsers” appear that clean the
sediment surfaces for diatoms, and the “non-selective deposit-feeders” that via bacteria and
smaller bacteria-eating organisms, take up the organic matter from the sediment. Important
representatives of browsers and deposit-feeders are found among crustaceans, snails, worms
and clams. All these animals are food for fish, and the productive shallow water areas are
in this way important nursery places for flatfish and other edible fish.
118
GENERAL ECOLOGY Lake ecosystems
8 LAKE ECOSYSTEMS
Figure 60 shows a diagrammatic cross section of a lake with its various life zones.
Littoral
zone
Limnetic
zone
Pelagic
zone
Profundal
zone
Fig. 60. The three main zones in a lake ecosystem. The

boundary between the limnetic zone and the profundal
zone is marked by the light-compensation depth. The
littoral zone extends from the lake shore and out to where
the vegetation of larger-rooted plants terminates due to
lack of light.
Closest to the lakeshore is the littoral zone with larger roothold plants. The pelagic zone is
the open water outside the littoral zone where light is the limiting factor for the roothold
plants. The pelagic zone is subdivided into an upper limnetic zone and an underlying
profundal zone. The border between the two zones is marked by the light-compensation
depth. The photosynthetic unicellular planktonic algae in the autotrophic limnetic zone
create (depending on the lake’s size and depth) most of the primary production, which is
the basis of all other life in the lake. However, many lakes receive large amounts of organic
matter from the surroundings, such as dead leaves in the autumn. The plankton algae
(green algae, blue-green algae, dinoflagellates and others) are “grazed” by many species of
zooplankton (daphnia, copepods, rotifers, protozoa and others), which in turn are eaten by
fish, etc., see Fig. 61. The life in the heterotrophic profundal zone is based on descending
algae and detritus from the limnetic zone. The number of animal species that live on or in
the lake bottom (benthos animals) is not overwhelmingly high, because the lake bottom
is fairly homogeneous (i.e. there are few “niches”). Besides, the animals need to survive
during prolonged periods without or with very little oxygen in the water. There are two
main types of benthos animals: 1) “Suspension feeders” which live by filtering suspended
food particles from the ambient water, and 2) “deposit feeders” (e.g. tube-dwelling worms,
certain species of red chironomid larvae, snails) that live by eating the upper layer of bottom
mud that receives organic matter in the form of sinking plankton algae and detritus from
the limnetic zone. The benthic fauna is important prey for fish, where most larger fish live
in the profundal zone.
119
Corethra (mosquito)
Plankton algae Daphnia
Copepod
Common
Rotifer whitefish
Eel
Corethra
Predatory
daphnia Pike
Roach
Sialis
Tench
Mussel
Chironomid larvae and tube-dwelling worms
Fig. 61. Schematic representation of the food chains in a lake [53]. According to the “classical” view,
the grazing food chains start with plankton algae, which are eaten by filter-feeding zooplankton
(daphnia, copepods, rotifers, etc.). However, it has now been realised that about 30–50% of the organic
matter that the plankton algae (in fresh water as well as in the sea) produce by photosynthesis is lost
to the surrounding water as “dissolved organic matter”. This substance is taken up by bacteria which
converts the dissolved organic substance to bacterial substance which is available as feed for flagellates,
ciliates and other organisms that feed by filtering microscopic food particles from the water. The
“classical” description of the aquatic grazing food chains first link must therefore be revised.
8.1 TEMPERATURE STRATIFICATION IN LAKES

There are few examples of a physical factor that exerts a more direct control over an ecosystem
than the temperature of a lake. In the following sections, this shall be explained in more
detail. The density of freshwater is greatest at 4 °C, see Fig. 62.
120
1.0000
Density
4
0.9990
0.9980
0 4 8 12 16 20 ºC
Temperature
Fig. 62. The water density is highest

at 4 °C [52]. A consequence in deep
lakes, there is a stratification of the
water column during the summer.
Brain power By 2020, wind could provide one-tenth of our planet’s

electricity needs. Already today, SKF’s innovative know-
how is crucial to running a large proportion of the
world’s wind turbines.
Up to 25 % of the generating costs relate to mainte-
nance. These can be reduced dramatically thanks to our
systems for on-line condition monitoring and automatic
lubrication. We help make it more economical to create
cleaner, cheaper energy out of thin air.
By sharing our experience, expertise, and creativity,
industries can boost performance beyond expectations.
Therefore we need the best employees who can
meet this challenge!
The Power of Knowledge Engineering
Plug into The Power of Knowledge Engineering.

Visit us at www.skf.com/knowledge
121
This means that freshwater with a higher or lower temperature is lighter than at 4 °C and will
therefore tend to float above this. By observing a deep lake with 4 °C water from surface to
bottom (a normal situation in lakes in the temperate zone in the spring), you will see that
the sun heats the upper water masses as the days become longer and the sun rises higher
in the sky. If the water in the lake is not stirred, the temperature will drop gradually from
the surface down to 4 °C. However, the surface water in a lake is not stagnant because the
wind mixes the surface water down to a depth of 8–20 m. The result is the formation of
a warm surface layer heated by the sun and stirred by the wind. Below this warm surface
layer (epilimnion) is a thermocline (or metalimnion) that separates the warm surface layer
from the deeper water layer (hypolimnion), see Fig. 63.
Wind
4 ºC Temperature
0
Epilimnion
Metalimnion
or Thermocline
Water depth
Hypolimnion
Fig. 63. Typical distribution of temperature in a deep lake during summer.
Once a thermocline has been established, the warmer surface water and the deeper colder
water are in fact separated from each other since there is practically no exchange between
the two bodies of water (“summer stratification”). The thermocline thus prevents a direct
exchange of nutrients between the epilimnion and the hypolimnion, although the wind
may cause a secondary weak circulation in the hypolimnion, see Fig. 64.
122
Wind
Epilimnion
Metalimnion
Hypolimnion
Fig. 64. Diagrammatic illustration of wind-induced circulation in the epilimnion and hypolimnion
in a temperature-stratified lake.
Trust and responsibility

NNE and Pharmaplan have joined forces to create – You have to be proactive and open-minded as a
NNE Pharmaplan, the world’s leading engineering newcomer and make it clear to your colleagues what
and consultancy company focused entirely on the you are able to cope. The pharmaceutical field is new
pharma and biotech industries. to me. But busy as they are, most of my colleagues
find the time to teach me, and they also trust me.
Inés Aréizaga Esteva (Spain), 25 years old Even though it was a bit hard at first, I can feel over
Education: Chemical Engineer time that I am beginning to be taken seriously and
that my contribution is appreciated.
NNE Pharmaplan is the world’s leading engineering and consultancy company

focused entirely on the pharma and biotech industries. We employ more than
1500 people worldwide and offer global reach and local knowledge along with
our all-encompassing list of services. nnepharmaplan.com
123
In the autumn when the temperature drops in the epilimnion and eventually becomes the
same temperature as the hypolimnion, the thermocline vanishes and the wind can now
mix all the water in the lake, from surface to bottom (“autumn total circulation”). When
the temperature in late autumn drops below 4 °C, a “cold” epilimnion and a “warm”
hypolimnion is established so that the lake again becomes stratified (“winter stratification”).
Ice on the lake surface often causes the winter stratification to become weak due to the
wind not being able to stir the water in the epilimnion. In spring, when the ice melts and
the temperature at the surface rises to 4 °C, the wind can again completely mix the water
masses (“spring total circulation”), see Fig. 65.
Temperature (°C)
0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4
Water depth
Summer Autumn Winter Spring

stratification turnover stratification turnover
Fig. 65. The seasonal temperature distribution in a typical deep lake in the temperate zone. The
thermal-stratification causes that the water masses are only totally mixed in fall and spring.
8.2 SEASONAL VARIATIONS IN LAKES

The seasonal thermal stratification and total circulation of the water masses in spring and
autumn are critical to the energy and nutrient cycling in deeper lakes. This fact can be
illustrated with an example from one of the world’s most studied lakes, namely Lake Esrum
in Denmark, see Fig. 66.
124
13/10
18/10
11/11
11/5
12/7
25/8
15/9
11/6
6/1
0
5 Temperature
depth, m
10
15 9 11 13 15 17 19
°C
2 20
20 A
10
9 13 11 8 10
25
Distance in m 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900
13/10
25/8
8/12
15/9
3/8
0
ml/l 1 5 8
5 Oxygen
depth, m
10
15
20 B 1 5 7 7 8
25
March April May JuneJuly August Sept.

0
5 diatoms green algae

blue green
depth, m
10 algae
pH
15
20
C
decaying plankton algae
25
pH
7 8 9
Fig. 66. Cross section of Lake Esrum, Denmark [54]. On the top section (A) is a series of temperature
curves for year 1955 plotted. It is seen that the temperature is uniform from the surface to the bottom
on 11 May. During the summer, a thermocline is established, which however, “eats” its way further and
further down during the summer due to wind stirring the epilimnion. On 11 November, there is about 9
°C throughout the water column and this allows the wind to mix the water in the whole lake (“autumn
total circulation”). Section B shows the concentration of oxygen in the same period. It is seen that the
thermocline’s stabilization of the water masses causes an extremely low oxygen concentration in the
bottom-near water. Lower section C shows the phytoplankton succession during summer. The phytoplankton
growth and species composition is controlled by the nutrient cycling and loss to the hypolimnion. Green
algae start to grow under the ice in March and are replaced by diatoms in April, but due to the temperature
stratification of the lake, the diatoms gradually use up all the silicon in the epilimnion and in June, it is
green algae that dominate. In July, nitrogen probably becomes the limiting factor for the growth of green
algae and these are replaced by nitrogen fixating blue-green algae. As the thermocline “eats” down into
the more nutrient-rich bottom water, epilimnion is supplied with nutrients and this may the reason why
diatoms become dominant again in September.
125
The growth and species composition of the phytoplankton is controlled by the cycling and loss
of nutrients to the hypolimnion. But it is not only the allogeneic succession of phytoplankton
in the summer season that is controlled by the temperature and its stratification of the
water masses. Also the benthic fauna is affected, partly by the low oxygen concentrations
in the near-bottom water, and partly by the food value of the organic material that sinks
to the bottom. In the summer when the lake is stratified, the algae are dead and decaying
when they settle to the bottom. This is of great importance for the growth of the red
chironomid larva (midge larva) Chironomus anthracinus that is found in a number of about
20,000 individuals per m2 on the lake bottom, where it lives on settled algal cells. When
the temperature stratification causes low oxygen content and the food becomes more or less
rotten, the chironomid larvae stop feeding. Between the spring and autumn total circulation,
the larvae are hardly growing. On the other hand, they can make a tenfold increase of their
weight in the course of the few weeks during the spring- and autumn total circulation last.
In the summer stagnation period without oxygen at the bottom, the fish stay away, and
during this time there is no fish consumption of chironomid larvae. The thermal stratification
of the lake is critical not only for the population dynamics of the chironomid larvae, but
also for the fish production, and therefore the whole lake’s nutrient and energy turnover.
This e-book
is made with SETASIGN
SetaPDF
PDF components for PHP developers
www.setasign.com
126
Seasonal variation in a lake is largely determined by the individuality of the lake, i.e. its
depth, its exposure to wind, the amount of dissolved nutrients, the age of the lake, etc.,
which makes it impossible to generalize from conditions in Lake Esrum. Another example,
also from Denmark, can illustrate this. Hjarbæk Fjord is one of Limfjorden’s many branches
and was, until the establishment of a causeway in 1966, a shallow brackish water area.
With the dam construction Hjarbæk Fjord, it became a freshwater lake with poor water
exchange. This, together with the input of significant amounts of nutrients (nitrate leaching
from agricultural areas, phosphate from domestic sewage), has caused arise of a number
of environmental problems, both within and around this former fjord. Hjarbæk Fjord can
serve as a characteristic example of a lake ecosystem that has been brought out of ecological
balance due to eutrophication.
In the early 1980s, the residents around Hjarbæk Fjord were plagued by billions of flying
midges during the summer months. The plague has been described, in an ecological context,
in a comprehensive environmental report [55]. Briefly, the plague by midges is explained
as follows: Approximately 90% of Hjarbæk Fjord is so shallow that the wind can easily stir
the water masses so that oxygen never becomes a limitation factor for the growth of the
midges’ larvae (chironomid larvae) living on the bottom. A large production of plankton
algae ensures that more than 30,000 chironomid larvae per m2 can live on the bottom. In
the summer months, there is very little predation by fish on the larvae because the water
quality from May to August is so poor (high pH, high concentrations of ammonia) that the
fish perish or swim away, see Fig. 67. Therefore, billions of midges can hatch and spread
their wings. It has been calculated that if 1/10 of the chironomid production were used for
the production of eel biomass, then the annual eel production in Hjarbæk Fjord could be
around 250 tons of eels.
127
30
11
pH
10
Biomass, mg/l
9
Plankton algae
20 Zooplankton 8
7
J F M A M J J A S O N D
10 0.2
NH3, mg/l
0.1
J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D
Fig. 67. Seasonal variation of phytoplankton, zooplankton, pH and NH3 (ammonia) in Hjarbæk Fjord, Denmark,
in 1981 [55]. Due to the large amounts of plant nutrients (domestic waste water, trout farms, agricultural
areas), there was an intense algae production, which in the period from May to July, resulted in a high pH
that was so high that it was lethal for most fish (dashed line in figure), which therefore died or fled to adjacent
watercourses. The reduced fish predation impact on the zooplankton resulted in a drastic increase in the
population of especially daphnia, which gradually “grazed” down the plankton algae while releasing large
amounts of ammonia in the urine. From late June to late August, the ammonia concentration in the water
was mortally high for fish (dashed line in figure) and the total loss of fish as regulating factor for the zooplankton,
resulted in a complete grazing down of the plankton algae, so that the zooplankton population was
subsequently exposed for a drastic fall due to starvation. Consequently, the algal production increased again,
forming the basis for a renewed large zooplankton population. The violent variations in the algal and
zooplankton biomass show that the ecosystem is out of balance.
128
GENERAL ECOLOGY Forest ecosystems
9 FOREST ECOSYSTEMS
A deciduous forest can be divided into several layers, with the highest peaks of trees forming
a canopy, and below, where there is an undergrowth of smaller trees, can be found low
shrubs and shrubbery. Finally on the forest floor, there may be found a layer of herbaceous
plants. This stratification is caused by the light which is increasingly becoming a limiting
factor for plant growth. The tendency for stratification becomes more and more pronounced
when going from northern to southern geographical regions. In some tropical jungles, it is
so dark that the bats are out in the daytime.
The part of a forest that receives sunlight, i.e. the treetops in a dense forest, constitute the
autotrophic zone of the forest ecosystem, which is dominated by the photosynthetic tree
crowns’ primary production, while the underlying layer represents the forest ecosystem’s
heterotrophic zone, which is dominated by decomposition processes and thus respiration,
see Fig. 68.
129
mainly
production
light
O2
leaves leaves
CO 2
uptake uptake mainly

respiration
wash out
Fig. 68. A forest ecosystem can be divided into an autotrophic zone, where primary production is
dominant, and in a heterotrophic zone, where respiration is dominant. With fallen leaves, nutrients
are lost from the autotrophic zone to the heterotrophic zone where decomposition takes place,
whereby nutrients are released to the “abiotic pool”. From here, the nutrients are absorbed by plant
roots or they leach out. In a mature forest ecosystem, the leaching of nutrients is small compared to
the exchange between the “abiotic pool” and “biotic pool” (living organisms, detritus), i.e. the
nutrient cycles are “tight”.
From the ecosystem’s autotrophic zone, there is constantly loss of nutrients via fallen leaves,
twigs and branches to the heterotrophic zone. Here, the decomposers in the detritus-food
chain utilize the energy of dead organic material, which is mineralized with release of
inorganic nutrients that can be taken up by tree roots, and once again brought up into the
autotrophic zone. This cyclical transport of the chemical components between a biotic and
an abiotic pool is in mature ecosystems characterized by a very small loss, since usually only
a tiny fraction of the biologically available substances in the abiotic pool are leaching out and
carried away. Intensive studies of a number of nutrient cycles and leaching in a temperate
deciduous forest in New Hampshire (Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest) has shown, for
example, that a small wooded area had an abiotic calcium pool of 690 kg/ha. About 12
kg/ha/year were leaching out while there was an input of 3 kg/ha/year from precipitation,
and thus the annual net loss of calcium was 9 kg/ha or 1.3% of the abiotic pool. This loss
is compensated for, however, through the weathering of minerals, see Fig. 69.
130
Precipitation
3
Watershed
Biotic pool
biomass: 570
detritus: 1740 Streams
Weathering
50 50
of minerals
Abiotic pool
available Ca: 9
690
Loss with water

outflow
12
Fig. 69. Calcium’s cycle in a forest ecosystem

(Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest, New Hampshire,
U.S.A.). The figure shows the amount of calcium (kg/
ha) in the biotic- and abiotic pool, the rate (kg/ha /
year) by which calcium moves from one pool to the
other and input and loss of this chemical element. It
is seen that there is a small net loss of 9 kg/ha/year
(12-3 = 9), but this is compensated for by the
weathering of minerals. It is noteworthy that the input
and loss of calcium is very small in relation to the
internal circulation in the ecosystem, which is
bounded by a watershed. Studies of other nutrient
cycles in the same forest ecosystems have shown
similar closed cycles [56].
131
The distribution of nutrients in a biotic- and an abiotic pool in a temperate forest differ
substantially from the nutrient distributions in a tropical rainforest. While about half of
the organic carbon in a temperate forest is stored in the soil, only about one sixth of the
total organic carbon is stored in the soil in a tropical rainforest. Almost 60% of the total
amount of nitrogen in the rainforest is found in the biotic pool (leaves, wood), while it
is only about 6% of the total amount of nitrogen that is found in the biotic pool in a
temperate coniferous forest. In the tropical rainforest the abiotic pool of nutrients is thus
very small, relative to the amount bound in the living tissue. Dead plants and animals
decompose quickly in the humid and warm rain forest, and the released nutrients are
immediately taken up again in living plant tissue. In other words, the mineralization speed
is fast and the nutrient cycling “tight” in the tropical rainforest. When a temperate forest is
cleared, the soil preserves its structure and retains relatively effective nutrients. In this way,
the land can be cultivated for centuries, as long as the soil is plowed and with appropriately
intervals, fed manure equivalent to the amount of nutrients removed by crops. In addition,
the cold winter counteracts the tendency of pests and diseases in the annual monoculture
crops, which are typical of temperate European agriculture. The situation is different in the
tropics. Here, soon after the clearing or burning of forests, this results in an impoverishment
of the soil due to the nutrients being quickly washed away or used up, after a few years
of cultivation of “cashcrops” (cacao, coffee, etc.). Since the topsoil in tropical soils is very
thin, the tremendous clearing of tropical forests (rainforests as well as forests with scattered
growth of trees) in recent times, has led to extensive environmental devastations due to the
topsoil being washed away by rain or blown away by the wind. Many tropical forest areas
have been overexploited and foolishly have been transformed into shrub steppes or desert.
The importance of the devastations can be seen in Ethiopia where forests have been cleared
for fuel and timber and the bare fields have been overgrazed. About 100 years ago, half of
Ethiopia was covered by forests but today forests cover only about 3%. Around 1 billion tons
of soil is flushed down from the previous fertile highlands every year, causing the northern
parts of this area to be lost for farming forever. Something similar can happen in Tanzania,
where there will not be a tree left in a few years time, if the current trend continues.
132
Drought and hunger disasters in Africa are not only a question of declining rainfall, but
largely a result of overexploitation and wrong use of natural resources. The presence of trees
is crucial to evapouration in the tropics, and a large green cover can retain large amounts
of water and prevent that water is lost through run-off to rivers and lakes. Treetops pick
up a large part of the precipitation while the tree roots absorb and utilize the water that
reaches the ground level. Large areas with trees act as a living sponge that stabilizes the water
balance, the air humidity and the temperature. The conservation of forests and trees, to
prevent loss of water and nutrients, and to protect against erosion, has become an essential
part of the fight against drought and hunger in many developing countries. In recognition
of the ecological impact of the extensive deforestation, future international assistance to
African developing countries should support the introduction of new farming methods that
combine forestry and agriculture (agroforestry).
9.1 FOOD CHAINS IN FORESTS

Only a few larger animals directly eat the vegetation in a forest, but some insects graze on,
suck the fluids or eat their way inside the leaves (tunnelling). Fig. 70 shows an example
of a grazing food chain in a forest. It is only a small part of a forest ecosystem’s primary
production that passes through the “grazing food chains” due to (in the order of ) 90% of
the energy flow, in a deciduous forest, goes through the “detritus food chain”.
Sharp Minds - Bright Ideas!

Employees at FOSS Analytical A/S are living proof of the company value - First - using The Family owned FOSS group is
new inventions to make dedicated solutions for our customers. With sharp minds and the world leader as supplier of
cross functional teamwork, we constantly strive to develop new unique products - dedicated, high-tech analytical
Would you like to join our team? solutions which measure and
control the quality and produc-
FOSS works diligently with innovation and development as basis for its growth. It is tion of agricultural, food, phar-
reflected in the fact that more than 200 of the 1200 employees in FOSS work with Re- maceutical and chemical produ-
search & Development in Scandinavia and USA. Engineers at FOSS work in production, cts. Main activities are initiated
development and marketing, within a wide range of different fields, i.e. Chemistry, from Denmark, Sweden and USA
Electronics, Mechanics, Software, Optics, Microbiology, Chemometrics. with headquarters domiciled in
Hillerød, DK. The products are
We offer marketed globally by 23 sales
A challenging job in an international and innovative company that is leading in its field. You will get the companies and an extensive net
opportunity to work with the most advanced technology together with highly skilled colleagues. of distributors. In line with
the corevalue to be ‘First’, the
Read more about FOSS at www.foss.dk - or go directly to our student site www.foss.dk/sharpminds where
company intends to expand
you can learn more about your possibilities of working together with us on projects, your thesis etc.
its market position.
Dedicated Analytical Solutions

FOSS
Slangerupgade 69
3400 Hillerød
Tel. +45 70103370
www.foss.dk
133
LEAVES AND NEEDLES
Leaf and Juice Tunnellers, Leaf rollers, Gall formers,

needle eaters, suckers, e.g. e.g. e.g.
e.g. e.g.
aphids beatles aphids
leaf wasps mites aphids gall wasps
beatles beetles gall midges
Predatory insects and

parasites, e.g.
ladybirds parasitic wasps
Small birds and small

mammals, e.g.
tits forest mouse
songbirds shrew
Large birds and large

mammals, e.g.
owls foxes
birds of prey martens
Fig. 70. Only few larger animals eat the vegetation in a forest, but some insects graze on, suck
the fluids or eat their way inside the leaves and needles (tunnelling) [57]. The figure shows a
number of examples of herbivorous insects and the predators that pursue them. It is noted
that the secondary carnivores in the shown “grazing food chain” in a temperate forest, may
also act as primary carnivores. However, only a small part of the primary production passes
through the grazing food chains in forest ecosystems. The main part (approximately 90%) goes
through detritus food chains.
Among the organisms in a detritus food chain, for example in an oak forest floor, one can
(excluding of fungi and bacteria) find the following detritus eaters: woodlouse, snails, slugs,
mites, springtails, nematodes and enchytraeids (small whitish worms), and the following
predators: scolopendres, beetles, shrews. Most detritus-eating animals actually live off of the
microorganisms sitting on dead organic matter. However, the rate at which the microorganisms
grow is dependent on the activity of the detritus-eaters, since these mechanically degrade
the dead organic matter. This produces small particles, which together have a very large
surface area, upon which the microorganisms can act. In addition, the detritus-eating
animals create a bioturbation (“stirring”), so that the microorganisms’ environment does
not become anaerobic.
134
Fig. 71 shows an example of how the energy can flow through a temperate forest ecosystem.
It is seen that only 2.5% of the ecosystem’s primary production goes through the herbivore
organisms (30/1200 = 0.025), while 52% of the net primary production goes through the
detritus food chain’s decomposers ((250 + 370)/1,200 = 0.52). Further, note that the forest
ecosystem’s gross primary production (2650) is greater than the ecosystem’s total respiration
(2100), which gives rise to a net ecosystem production (NEP = 2650 - 2100 = 550). This
accumulates in the form of an increase in plant biomass. The accumulation of organic matter
occurs during an autotroph succession, and that this forest ecosystem is an approximately
80% mature ecosystem (2,100/2,650 = 0.79). In the present example, the biomass of the
primary producers is 10,000 g organic matter/m2, whereas their gross primary production
(Pb) is 2.650 g organic matter/m2/year, that is, the turnover time of the primary producers
(B/Pb) is about 4 years (10,000/2,650 = 3.8).
Challenge the way we run
EXPERIENCE THE POWER OF

FULL ENGAGEMENT…
RUN FASTER.
RUN LONGER.. READ MORE & PRE-ORDER TODAY
RUN EASIER… WWW.GAITEYE.COM
1349906_A6_4+0.indd 1 22-08-2014 12:56:57
135
Total respiration = 2,100
Plants Herbivores Decomposers
1,450 30 250 370
Gross primary
production 2,650
Net primary 500 Accumulation 500

Biomass
10,000 production 1,200
700 NEP
Dead leaves etc. 360
Leaves etc. 1,600 550
Roots 310 Humus 420 Accumulation 50

Humus 4,700
Leaching out
Fig. 71. The flow of energy in an oak-pine forest on Long Island, U.S.A. It is seen that about half of the
gross primary production is used for the plants’ own metabolism (respiration), which is normal for forests
in the temperate zone. In the tropics, a greater part of the primary production is used for the plants’ own
respiration, whereas in the arctic regions, a smaller part of the total primary production is used for the
plants’ own respiration. The net primary production goes to: 1) herbivores, 2) decomposers, 3) accumulation
(storage). The most important herbivores are insects and a scarce population of small mammals. But it is
only a few percent of the net primary production that is consumed directly by the herbivores, and virtually
everything that these animals consume is used for their own respiration. Thus, they do not contribute to
the net ecosystem production (NEP = 550). But the growing biomass of trees contributes substantially to
NEP, as more than 40% of the net primary production is used for this purpose. The remaining part of the
net ecosystem production is made up of easily degradable humus, which is accumulated in the soil. All
numbers for speed of energy flows are given in g organic matter/m2/year [46].
136
9.2 HUMUS AND NUTRIENT BALANCE

In young forest ecosystems, it is characteristic that the organisms in the detritus food chain
are not able to totally break down the dead organic material that is added to the soil in the
form of leaves, twigs, branches, herbs, animal waste etc. The end products of the organic
matter decomposition are typically a variety of organic molecules which are collectively called
humus. These molecules are characterized by being negatively charged (as clay particles). A
typical humus particle’s ability to absorb positively charged ions is up to 50 times greater
than that of a clay particle. The formation of humus in a forest ecosystem is therefore
crucial for the ability of the soil to retain essential nutrients, such as Ca++, K+, Mg++, NH4+,
which would otherwise be quickly washed out of the soil. The trees can release the absorbed
nutrients when their roots release H+ or the roots emit CO2 that forms carbonic acid, which
split off H+. By ion exchange, this releases the positively charged nutrients, which can then
be taken up by the tree roots. In this way, a delicate balance is established between the trees’
nutrient needs and the abiotic pool of these substances. It is important to note that this
balance can be disturbed by acid rain caused by air pollution with sulphur and nitrogen
oxides that react with water to form sulphuric acid and nitric acid (see sections 3.3 and
3.4). Acid rain can indirectly damage the trees by causing leaching of nutrients, resulting in
nutrient deficiency (the trees’ leaves become yellow). In addition, acid rain releases poisonous
heavy metals absorbed to humus and clay particles, which damage the tree roots resulting
in the trees suffering from lack of water and nutrients. Finally, soil acidification inhibits
the microbial processes causing the speed of the mineralization of detritus to be reduced,
resulting in nutrient deficiency for the trees.
137
GENERAL ECOLOGY References
REFERENCES
[1] Odum, E.P. 1971. Fundamentals of ecology. Saunders Co., Philadelphia, 574 pp.
[2] Solomon et al. 2016. Emergence of healing in the Antarctic ozone layer. Science, doi:
10.1126/science.aae0061
[3] Clapham, W.B. 1983. Natural ecosystems. Macmillan Publishing Co., Inc., New York,
282 pp.
[4] Ingersoll, A.P. 1983. The atmosphere. Scientific American, 249, 114–130.
[5] Revelle, R. 1982. Carbon dioxide and world climate. Scientific American, 247, 33–41.
[6] Warren, C.F. 1971. Bioenergetics and growth. – In: Biology and water pollution control,
pp. 135–167. Saunders Co., Philadelphia.
[7] Kormondy, E.J. 1969. Concepts of ecology. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New
Jersey, 209 pp.
The Wake
the only emission we want to leave behind
.QYURGGF'PIKPGU/GFKWOURGGF'PIKPGU6WTDQEJCTIGTU2TQRGNNGTU2TQRWNUKQP2CEMCIGU2TKOG5GTX
6JGFGUKIPQHGEQHTKGPFN[OCTKPGRQYGTCPFRTQRWNUKQPUQNWVKQPUKUETWEKCNHQT/#0&KGUGN6WTDQ
2QYGTEQORGVGPEKGUCTGQHHGTGFYKVJVJGYQTNFoUNCTIGUVGPIKPGRTQITCOOGsJCXKPIQWVRWVUURCPPKPI
HTQOVQM9RGTGPIKPG)GVWRHTQPV
(KPFQWVOQTGCVYYYOCPFKGUGNVWTDQEQO
138
[8] Cade, T.J., J.L. Lincer & C.M. White. 1971. DDE residues and eggshell changes in
Alaskan falcons and hawks. Science, 172, 955–957.
[9] Ratcliffe, D.A. 1967. Decrease in eggshell weight in certain birds and prey. Nature,
215, 208–210.
[10] Riisgård, H.U. 1984. Mercury pollution in the waters around Harboøre Tange and
Limfjord, Denmark. Mar. Pollut. Bull., 15, 129–133.
[11] Riisgård, H.U. & S. Hansen. 1990. Biomagnification of mercury in a marine grazing
food-chain: algal cells Phaeodaetylum tricornutum, mussels Mytilus edulis and flounders
Platichthys flesus studied by means of a stepwise reduction-CVAA method. Mar. Ecol. Prog.
Ser. 62, 259–270.
[12] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2016. Climate change indicators in the United
States, 2016. Fourth edition. EPA 430-R-16-004. www.epa.gov/climate–indicators
[13] Bolin, B. 1970. The carbon cycle. – In: The biosphere, pp. 49–56. Scientific American,
Inc.
[14] Delwiche, C.C. 1970. The nitrogen cycle. – In: The biosphere pp. 71–80. Scientific
American, Inc.
[15] Houghton, R.A. & G.M. Woodwell. 1989. Global climatic change. Scientific American,
260, 18–26.
[16] Deevey, E.S. 1970. Mineral cycles. – In: The biosphere, pp. 83–92. Scientific American,
Inc.
[17] Devol, A.H. 2003. Nitrogen cycle: solution to a marine mystery. Nature, 422, 575–576.
[18] Dalsgaard, T., D.E. Canfield, J. Petersen, B. Thamdrup & J. Acuna-Golzález. 2003.
N2 production by anammox reaction in the anoxic water column of Golfo Dulce, Costa
Rica. Nature, 422, 606–608.
[19] Likens, G.E., R.F. Wright, J.N. Galloway & T.J. Butler. 1979. Acid rain. Scientific
American, 241 (4), 39–47.
139
[20] Jørgensen, B.B. 1980. Seasonal oxygen depletion in the bottom waters of a Danish
fjord and its effect on the benthic community. Oikos, 34, 68–76.
[21] Schindler, D.W. 1974. Eutrophication and recovery in experimental lakes: implications
for lake management. Science, 184, 897–899.
[22] Fenchel, T., L.H. Kofoed & A. Lappalainen. 1975. Particle size-selection of two deposit
feeders: the amphipod Corophium volutator and the prosobranch Hydrobia ulvae. Marine
Biology, 30, 119–128.
[23] Gause, G.F. 1934. The struggle for existence. Hafner Publishing Company, New York,
163 pp.
[24] Park, T. 1984. Experimental studies on interspecies competition: II. Temperature,

humidity and competition in two species of Tribolium. Physiol. Zool., 27, 177–238.
[25] Beauchamp, R.S.A. & P. Ullyott. 1932. Competitive relationships between certain
species of freshwater triclads. J. Ecol., 20, 200–208.
[26] Connell, J.H. 1961. The influence and interspecific competition and other factors on
the distribution of the barnacle Chthamalus stellatus. Ecology, 42, 710–723.
[27] Gause, G.F. 1935. Verifications experimentales de la theorie mathematique de la lutte

pour la vie. Actualites scientifiques et industrielles 277. Hermann et cie, Paris, 62 pp.
[28] Lack, D. 1945. Ecology of closely related species with special reference to cormorant
(Phalacrocorax varbo) and shag (P. aristotelis). J. Anim. Ecol., 14, 12–16.
[29] Heatwole, H. & D.M. Davis. 1965. Ecology of three sympatric species of parasitic
insects of the genus Megarhyssa (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae). Ecology, 46, 140–150.
[30] Lack, D. 1947. Darwin’s finches. Cambridge University Press, 208 pp.
[31] MacLulich, D.A. 1937. Fluctuations in the numbers of the varying hare (Lepus
americanus). Univ. Toronto Studies, Biol. Ser. No. 43.
[32] Leopold, A. 1943. Deer irruptions. Wisconsin Cons. Dept. 321, 3–11.
140
[33] Slobodkin, L.B. 1961. Growth and regulation of animal populations. Holt, Rinehart
and Winston, New York, 184 pp.
[34] Strandgaard, H. 1972. The roe deer population at Kalø and the factors regulating its
size. D. Rev. Game Biol., 7, 1–205.
[35] Davidson, J. 1938. On the growth of the sheep population in Tasmania. Tr. Roy Soc.
S. Australia, 62: 342–346.
[36] Krebs, C.J. 1972. Ecology – the experimental analysis of distribution and abundance.
Harper International Edition, 694 pp.
[37] Christiansen, F.B. & T.M. Fenchel. 1977. Theories of populations in biological
communities. Springer-Verlag, 144 pp.
[38] Hedrick, P.W. 1984. Population biology. Jones and Bartlett Publishers, Inc. Boston,
445 pp.
Month 16
I was
the North Sea super
advising and the No
Real work he
International
al opportunities
Internationa
�ree wo
work
Real work he
helping fo
International
�ree wo
work
141
[39] Paine, R.T. 1966. Food web complexity and species diversity. American Naturalist
100:65–75
[40] Sanders, H.L. 1968. Marine benthic diversity: A comparative study. Amer. Natur.,
102: 243–282.
[41] MacArthur, R.H. 1972. Geographical ecology. Harper & Row, New York, 269 pp.
[42] Lassen, H.H. 1975. The diversity of freshwater snails in view of the equilibrium theory
of island biogeography. Oceologia, 19, 1–8.
[43] Estes, J.E., N.S. Smith & J.F. Palmisano. 1978. Sea otter predation and community
organization in the Western Aleutian Islands, Alaska. Ecology, 59, 822–833.
[44] Estes, J.A., M.T. Tinker, T.M. Williams & D.F. Doak. 1998. Killer whale predation
on sea otters linking oceanic and nearshore ecosystems. Science, 282, 473–476.
[45] Shiganova, T.A. Invasion of the Black Sea by the ctenophore Mnemiopsis leidyi and
recent changes in pelagic community structure. Fish. Oceanogr., 7, 305–310.
[46] Woodwell, G.M. 1970. The energy tyde of the biosphere. – In: The biosphere, pp.
26–36. Scientific American, Inc.
[47] Odum, H.T. 1956. Primary production in flowing waters. Limnology and Oceanography,
1, 102–117.
[48] Hynes, H.B.N. 1971. The biology of polluted waters. Liverpool University Press, 202 pp.
[49] Berkner, L.V. & L.C. Marshall. 1965. History of major atmospheric components.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 53 (6),
1215–1225.
[50] Van Valen, L. 1971. The history and stability of atmospheric oxygen. Science, 171,
439–443.
[51] Riisgård, H.U. & J. Goldstein. 2014. Jellyfish and ctenophores in Limfjorden (Denmark) –
mini-review, with recent new observations. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 2, 593–615.
[52] Steemann Nielsen, E. 1973. Hydrobiologi. Polyteknisk Forlag, 204 pp.
142
[53] Røen, U. 1969. Det dyriske plankton, pp. 209–236. I. Danmarks Natur, bind 5.
[54] Jonasson, P.M. 1969. Bottom fauna and eutrophication. In: Eutrophication: causes,
consequences, correctives pp. 274–305. National Academy of Sciences. Washington, D.C.
[55] Hjarbæk Fjord – recipientundersøgelser. 1982. Viborg Amtskommunes vand- og

miljøvæsen samt Vandkvalitetsinstituttet (9 reports in Danish).
[56] Bormann, F. & G.E. Likens. 1970. The nutrient cycles of an ecosystem. Scientific
American, 223, (4) 92–101.
[57] Bejer-Petersen, B. 1969. Hvirvelløse dyr som lever af træerne, pp. 425–479. Danmarks
Natur, bind 6. (book in Danish)
[58] Connell, J.H. 1978. Diversity in tropical rain forests and coral reefs. Science, 199,
1302–1310.
[59] Menell, A.C. & M.J. Bazin. 1988. Mathematics for the biosciences. Ellis Horwood
Limited, Chichester, 132 pp.
[60] Fenchel, T. 1987. Ecology – potentials and limitations. Excellence in Ecology 1. Ecology
Institute, Oldendorf/Luhe, FRG, 186 pp.
[61] Ginzburg, L.R. & E.M. Golenberg. 1985. Lectures in theoretical population biology.
Prentice-Hall, Inc., 246 pp.
[62] Azam, F., T. Fenchel, J.G. Field, J.S. Gray, L. Meyer-Reil, & F. Thingstad. 1983. The
ecological role of water-column microbes in the sea. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 10, 257–263.
[63] Sousa, W.P. 1979. Disturbance in marine intertidal boulder fields: the nonequilibrium
maintenance of species diversity. Ecology, 60, 1225–1239.
[64] Fenchel, T. 1968. The ecology of marine microbenthos III. The reproductive potential
of ciliates. Ophelia, 5, 123–136.
[65] Haldane, J.B.S. 1929. The origin of life. Tationalist Annual, 3, 3–10.
[66] Lane, N., J.F. Allen & M. Martin. 2010. How did LUCA make a living? Chemiosmosis
in the origin of life. BioEssays, 32, 271–280.
143
[67] Fenchel, T. 1975. Hvor mange arter? Naturens Verden, 6–7, 218–229. (in Danish)
[68] Bick, H. 1964. Die Sukzession der Organismen bei der Selbstreinigung von organisch
verunreinigtem Wasser unter verschiedenen Milieubedingungen. Ministerium für Ernährung,
Landwirtschaft und Forsten NRW, Düsseldorf, 139 pp.
[69] Fenchel, T. 1993. There are more small than large species? Oikos, 68, 375–378.
www.job.oticon.dk
144
GENERAL ECOLOGY Index
INDEX
A barnacle 55
abiotic 7, 27, 44, 47, 65, 130, 131, 132, 137 bathyal zone 109
abyssos 109 beaver 63
acid rain 42, 137 Beggiatoa 41, 43
actinobacteria 35 bell frog 93
actinomycetes 65 benthic 44, 109, 110, 119, 126
Agarum 62 benthic animals 112
agroforestry 133 benthic fish 112
Alaska 34, 62 benthic invertebrates 112
albedo 13 binary fission 80
algae 9, 31, 45, 50, 64, 81, 96, 98, 104, 110, 116, bioenergetics 17
119, 120, 125, 126, 127, 128 biogeochemical cycles 27, 28
allogeneic 102 biogeographical equilibrium 91
allogeneic succession 105, 126 biomagnification 26
ammonia 35, 36, 112, 113, 127, 128 biomass 18, 19, 20, 21, 25, 28, 82, 97, 98, 101,
amphipod 52 112, 116, 127, 128, 135, 136
Anabaena 35 biosphere 9, 10, 13, 29, 31, 46
anammox 35, 38 biosphere ecosystem 105
angiosperms 64 biosystem 8
anoxic 43, 45 biotope 95
aphotic zone 109, 113 bioturbation 134
assimilated food energy 17, 18, 22, 23, 28 birth rate 67
assimilation efficiency 19, 23 black cormorant 57, 58
Atlantic 114, 115, 116, 117 Black Sea 64
Atlantic Ocean 116 bloom 45, 50
atmosphere 10, 11, 28, 29, 30, 31, 35, 40, 41, 44, blue-green algae 98, 125
46, 105 blue-green photosynthetic bacteria 65
autecology 6 blue mussel 19
autogenous 96 brackish water 86, 127
autotrophic 16, 23, 29, 96, 99, 100, 105, 110, 119, browsers 118
129, 130 butterflies 62, 83
autumn maximum 116
C
autumn total circulation 124, 125, 126
Azotobacter 35 calcium carbonate 42
calcium sulphate 42
B camouflage 62
ballast water 64 carbohydrates 14, 27
Baltic Sea 86 carbon-14 method 112
145
carbon cycle 31 DDT 25

carbonic anhydrase 31 deamination 35, 37
carnivores 16, 22, 23, 24, 134 decomposers 9, 23, 24, 44, 112, 130, 135, 136
carrying capacity 61, 68, 70, 71, 74, 75, 76, 101 decomposition 31, 34, 40, 104, 116, 129, 130, 137
cash crops 132 deep sea 89, 109
Caspian Sea 86 deep-sea grooves 109
CFC 11 deer 61, 67
character displacement 58 defence mechanism 62
chemoautotrophic 41, 43 denitrification 35, 37
chironomid larvae 104, 119, 126, 127 density 47, 48, 66, 71, 72, 73, 79, 120
Chironomus anthracinus 126 deposit-feeders 52, 112, 118
chlorofluorocarbons 11, 34 Desulfovibrio 41, 43
Chthamalus 55, 56 detritus 16, 22, 23, 24, 44, 96, 99, 119, 130, 133,
ciliates 52, 53, 56, 65, 69, 70, 76, 78, 96, 98, 113, 134, 137
118, 120 detritus food chain 16, 23, 134
classical marine grazing food chains 111 detrivores 19, 24
Clostridium 35 diatoms 50, 98, 110, 118, 125
comb jelly 64 differential equations 80
commensalism 64 dinoflagellates 110, 119
community 7, 47, 51, 62, 83, 84, 87, 101, 104 dissolved organic matter 112, 113, 120
compensation depth 109, 116 diversity 62, 87, 89, 101, 107
competition 48, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 56, 65, 67, diversity index 83
71, 76, 79 DOM 112, 113
competition efficiency 76
E
competitive efficiency 77
continental shelf 109 ecological niches 59, 62, 91
continental slope 109 ecology 7, 108
continuum of qualities 105 ecosystem 7, 8, 10, 16, 23, 24, 45, 49, 86, 95, 97,
copepods 9, 96, 110, 113, 119, 120 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 107, 110, 119, 120,
coral reefs 85, 143 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 133, 136, 137
cormorant 57, 58 ecosystem engineers 63
Corophium 52 ecotoxicology 26
Crossmans 59 edge effect 90
ctenophore 64 electromagnetic radiation 10
cyanobacteria 35, 112, 113 emigrate 67
cysteine 40 endosymbiosis theory 65
energy budget 17
D energy pyramid 25, 26
damped oscillations 75 Enhydra lutris 62
Daphne 59 environmental poison 44
Darwin 59 environmental problems 45, 127
DDD 25 epilimnion 122, 123, 125
146
equations 76, 77, 80 flowering plants 64

essential trace elements 15, 27 food chains 14, 15, 16, 17, 19, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26,
estuaries 86, 89, 102 44, 64, 112, 113, 130, 133, 135, 137
Ethiopia 132 forest ecosystem 129, 130, 135
eutrophicated 38 fossil fuel 32
eutrophication 44, 45, 83, 127 freon 11
exponential 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 74, 80 fundamental niche 49, 55, 56, 86, 92
exponential growth 70, 71 fungi 9, 16, 26, 29, 64, 96, 134
F G
facilitation model 95 Galapagos Islands 59
facilitation-successions 95 gaseous types of cycles 28
faecal material 110 Gause 52, 54, 56
faecal pellets 110 generation time 69, 80
Fe+++ 43, 44 global energy balance 13
Fe(OH)3 43 global temperature 32, 34
FeS2 43 glucose 14, 37, 82
filter-feeders 26, 110, 112 grazers 16, 96, 110
finches 59 grazing food chain 14, 16, 22, 23, 25, 44, 112,
floaters 66, 67 113, 133, 134
flour beetles 53, 54, 55 greenhouse effect 32
DEDICATED TEACHERS,
WORLD-CLASS
RESEARCH,
CLOSE INDUSTRY
CONNECTIONS.
No tuition fees.
E liu.se/master
‡
147
gross primary production 14, 22, 24, 28, 31, 97, K

98, 99, 100, 101, 105, 112, 115, 116, 135, 136 Kaibab National Forest 61
groundwater 38, 43, 46 keystone species 62
grouse 93 krill 110
K-strategists 101
H
H2PO4- 44 L
H2S 40, 41 Lake Esrum 124
H2SO4 42, 43 Laminaria 62
Haldane, 105 legume plants 35
habitat 50, 58, 90 lichens 64
Haeckel 7 light-compensation depth 109, 116, 119
heat radiation 13, 16, 34 Limfjorden 43, 127
heavy metals 137 limnetic zone 119
heterotrophic 25, 28, 29, 40, 96, 97, 98, 100, 103, littoral zone 109, 119
112, 113, 119, 129, 130 logistic growth equation 71, 72, 75
heterotrophic bacteria 112 logistic growth model 71, 73
hierarchical control principle 8, 47 Long Island 136
Hjarbæk Fjord 127, 128 Lotka 76, 77, 79
host-parasite relationship 61 Lotka-Volterra equations 76, 80
Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest 130, 131 lynx 59, 60
Humboldt Current 114
M
humus 37, 136, 137
Hydrobia 52 MacArthur 91, 142
hydrogen sulphide 40, 41, 105 mackerel 64, 110
hypolimnion 122, 123, 125, 126 Macoma balthica 86
macroalgae 62, 118
I macronutrients 27
immigration 107 marginal territories 66
infrared radiation 10, 12, 32 metabolism 14, 16, 17, 18, 29, 136
inhibition 70, 73 metalimnion 122
insecticide 25, 79 methane 34, 105
insects 19, 20, 62, 64, 133, 134, 136 methionine 40
integrative level concept 8 microbial loop 111, 112, 113
intermediate disturbance hypothesis 86, 87 micronutrients 27
interspecific competition 50, 51, 54, 55, 58, 78, micro-organisms 52
86, 91, 105 midge larva 126, 127
interspecific factors 50 mimicry 62
inverted islands 92 Mnemiopsis leidyi 64
iron 43, 44, 112 monomethyl mercury 26
iron sulphide 43 mortality 67, 79
island-biogeography theory 91 mussel 62, 112
148
mutualism 64, 65 optimal territories 66

Mytilus californianus 62 Orcinus orca 62
organisation levels 8
N
organism level 7
N2 35, 55, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80 ospreys 25
natality 67 otter 62
negative feedback 70, 73, 74, 101 overgrazed 59, 132
(NEP) net ecosystem production 99, 101, 135, 136 overpopulation 61
net growth efficiency 19 oxidation 35, 36, 38, 40
net primary production 14, 24, 99, 135, 136 oxygen depletion 44
net production 15, 25, 99, 105 ozone 10, 11, 105
NGE (net growth efficiency) 19 ozone layer 11
NH3 35, 36, 128
NH4+ 35, 37, 137 P
niche diversification 57, 58 Paine 62
niche model 50 Paramecium 52, 53, 65, 76, 78
niche overlap 51, 52, 57 Paramecium aurelia 53, 76, 78
niches 50, 51, 58, 85, 89, 91, 99, 101, 105, 119 Paramecium caudatum 76
niche width 89 parasite relationship 61
nitrate 35, 36, 45, 104, 127 parasitic wasp 58
nitrate respiration 35 parasitism 50
nitrite 35, 36, 37 Park 54
Nitrobacter 37 Pearl-Verhulst model 71
nitrogen 9, 35, 36, 40, 42, 44, 65, 105, 112, 125, pelagial 112
132, 137 pelagic zone 109, 119
nitrogen cycle 35, 38 peregrines 25
nitrogen fixing 38, 65 permanent thermocline 116
nitrogen oxides 38 persistent 11, 25, 26
Nitrosomonas 37 pH 31, 37, 42, 49, 51, 116, 117, 127, 128
NO 38 Phalacrocorax aristotelis 57
NO2 35, 36, 37 Phalacrocorax carbo 57, 58
NO3- 35, 36 phosphate 9, 44, 104, 112, 113, 127
nodule bacteria 35, 65 phosphorus 44
North Atlantic threshold 114 phosphorus cycle 44
Nostoc 35 photic zone 31, 109, 113, 114
nutrients 9, 15, 27, 50, 65, 95, 97, 98, 104, 112, photo-autotrophic bacteria 112
114, 122, 125, 126, 128, 130, 132, 137 photochemical oxidation 42
photosynthesis 12, 14, 16, 29, 30, 31, 65, 116, 120
O photosynthetic sulphur bacteria 43
ochre pollution 43 phytoplankton 9, 31, 44, 50, 102, 109, 110, 114,
Oparin 105 125, 126, 128
opportunists 98 Pisaster ochraceus 62
149
Planaria gonocephala 55 primary producers 9, 16, 22, 23, 28, 29, 112, 118,
Planaria montenegrina 55 135
plankton algae 96, 98, 110, 116, 119, 120, 128 profundal zone 119
plaster 42 protozoans 104, 112
---
PO4 44 Pseudomonas denitrificans 37
pollutants 25 pulse stabilised sub-climax 102
pollution 13, 26, 42, 83, 84, 107, 137 purple sulphur bacteria 43
pollution indicators 84 pyrite 43
polychaete worms 112
R
population 7, 17, 18, 20, 21, 25, 47, 48, 52, 55,
59, 61, 62, 65, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 75, R0 69
76, 79, 80, 82, 86, 91, 93, 101, 107, 108, 112, rainforests 32, 107, 132
126, 128, 136, 141 realised niche 52
population density 66, 71, 72 resource-continuum 105, 106
population dynamics 79 respiration 14, 17, 18, 22, 23, 24, 25, 28, 31, 96, 97,
population production 20 98, 99, 100, 101, 105, 109, 129, 130, 135, 136
predation 50, 62, 127, 128 respiratory feedback mechanism 34
predator 59, 60, 62, 79, 80 respiratory process 41
predator/prey model 79 Rhizobium 35, 65
primary consumers 14, 16 root infections 65
INNOVATIVE
LIKE YOU.
150
ruminants 64 sulphate 40, 41

r-value 98, 101 sulphur 35, 40, 41, 44, 137
sulphur bacteria 41, 43
S
sulphur dioxide 40
S 25, 27, 28, 40, 44, 71, 83, 84, 131, 136, 139 sulphur trioxide 42
salinity 86, 89 sulphuric acid 42, 137
Santa Barbara 91 summer stratification 122
Santa Cruz 91 sun 10, 29, 46, 109, 116, 122
seaweed 62 survival-curve 20
secondary producers 16 suspension-feeders 112
sediment 40, 44, 112, 118 swamp gas 34
sedimentary types of cycles 28 symbiosis 35, 50, 64
selective deposit-feeders 112
semi-arid regions 65 T
Semibalanus 55, 56 t2 (doubling of time) 68, 81
Shannon index 83 Tanzania 132
sigmoid growth 68, 71, 73 Tasmania 75
silicon 50, 125 temperature 12, 34, 46, 49, 51, 54, 70, 86, 89, 90,
Silver Springs 23, 24, 25 102, 103, 116, 117, 120, 122, 123, 124, 125,
Simpson index 83 126, 133
snowshoe hare 59, 60 terrestrial 85
SO2 40 territory 66, 67, 74
SO3 42 tg 69, 80
SO4-- 40, 41, 43 thermal stratification 126
social mechanisms 65 thermocline 31, 116, 122, 125
social organization 65 Thiobacillus 41, 43
solar energy 10, 16, 46 Thiobacillus ferrooxidans 43
solar radiation 10, 13, 105 threatening postures 66
solar spectral distribution 10 tidal zone 55
species diversity 62, 83, 87, 89, 90, 91, 97, 98, tolerance model 95
101, 105 tolerance width 49
specific growth rate 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 80 transition zone 90
spring maximum 116 Tribolium 54, 55
spring total circulation 124 Tribolium confusum 54
stability 65, 86, 89, 98, 107 trophic classification 15
starfish 62 trophic level production efficiencies 22
stratification 116, 124, 125, 129 tropical rain forests 32, 86, 88, 89, 107, 129, 132
Strongylocentrotus polyacanthus 62 Tubifex 104
sublittoral zone 109 tuna 64
succession 88, 95, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, turbellarian worms 55
104, 125, 135 turnover rate 44, 98, 116
succession in space 12, 13, 50, 103, 104 turnover time 98, 116, 135
151
U waste water 104, 128

ultraviolet solar radiation 105 wet deserts 112, 114
universal model 18 white sulphur bacteria 43
upwelling 112 Wilson 91
urchin 62
winter stratification 124
urine 18, 22, 23, 37, 128
Uronema marina 70 Y
UV light 11 yield 40, 71
V
Z
Volterra 76, 77, 79
zonation 104
W zooplankton 9, 26, 50, 56, 64, 110, 113, 119,
wasp 58, 61 120, 128
152

General Ecology PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

General Ecology PDF

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

General Ecology PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

﻿

HANS ULRIK RIISGÅRD

1 Ecology and ecosystems 7

2 Energy flow in ecosystems 10

7 Marine ecosystems 109

8 Lake ecosystems 119

9 Forest ecosystems 129

Hans Ulrik Riisgård

1 ECOLOGY AND ECOSYSTEMS

1.1 ECOLOGY AND BIOSYSTEMS

living cells organs organisms populations community

1.2 ECOSYSTEM CONCEPT

bacteria and fungi

Fig. 2. Simplified model of an aquatic ecosystem. An ecosystem has a number of

2 ENERGY FLOW IN ECOSYSTEMS

2.1 SOLAR RADIATION AND GLOBAL ENERGY BALANCE

Spectral distribution of sunlight

uv visible light infrared

1 % absorbed Earth’s surface

Fig. 4. The global energy balance. The energy of the incoming

2.2 PRIMARY PRODUCTION AND PRODUCTIVITY

CO2 + 2H2O* → (CH2O) + O2* + H2O

By means of photosynthesis, land plants take up atmospheric CO2 which is incorporated

Fig. 5. The flow of energy through a land plant. Approximately 2% of

2.3 FOOD CHAINS

Grazing Primary Primary Secondary

Dead organic material (detritus)

ENERGY IN FAECES ENERGY IN ABSORBED FOOD

ENERGY IN ASSIMILATED FOOD: A

ENERGY FOR PRODUCTION

ENERGY EQUATION FOR AN INDIVIDUAL ANIMAL

Fig. 8. Universal model of energy flow through an organism, a

Study a Master’s programme in Gothenburg, Sweden | www.gu.se/education

NGE = P/A (III)

1) An often used method is based on determination of the population’s energy budget.

Fig. 9. Based on knowledge of the individual growth-curve and survival-

where a is the maximum life expectancy.

Fig. 10. The production of a population (P) can be determined by

2.5 ECOLOGICAL EFFICIENCIES

Primary producers Herbivores Carnivores

3000 1500 15 1.5 0.3

Relationship between trophic levels:

It/It-1: efficiency of trophic level energy intake

At/At-1: trophic level assimilation efficiency

Pt/ Pt-1: trophic level production efficiency

It/Pt-1: utilization efficiency

Relationships within trophic levels:

Pt/At: production efficiency

Pt/It: ecological growth efficiency

At/It: assimilation efficiency

Total incoming 1,478

Don’t just pick a place - pick a future.

Top predators NP=6

Respiration (R) Net production (NP) Respiration (R)

2.6 BIOMAGNIFICATION OF POLLUTANTS

Monomethyl mercury (CH3Hg+) can be mentioned as a final example of a chemical substance

Develop the tools we need for Life Science

We solve problems from

3.1 SEDIMENTARY AND GASEOUS NUTRIENT CYCLES

NGE = P/A (III)

IV: sulphate-reducing bacteria (Desulfovibrio): in the absence of oxygen, these bacteria

4.1.1 NICHE CONCEPT AND IMPORTANCE OF ABIOTIC FACTORS FOR

4.1.2 IMPORTANCE OF INTERSPECIFIC FACTORS FOR REGULATION