Plaintiff found a gold Rolex watch and cannot determine if Defendant 1 or Defendant 2 has a legitimate ownership claim over the watch. Plaintiff filed a complaint requesting the court to compel the Defendants to litigate their claims against each other in an interpleader action so Plaintiff can determine the rightful owner and receive compensation for storing the watch.
Plaintiff found a gold Rolex watch and cannot determine if Defendant 1 or Defendant 2 has a legitimate ownership claim over the watch. Plaintiff filed a complaint requesting the court to compel the Defendants to litigate their claims against each other in an interpleader action so Plaintiff can determine the rightful owner and receive compensation for storing the watch.
Plaintiff found a gold Rolex watch and cannot determine if Defendant 1 or Defendant 2 has a legitimate ownership claim over the watch. Plaintiff filed a complaint requesting the court to compel the Defendants to litigate their claims against each other in an interpleader action so Plaintiff can determine the rightful owner and receive compensation for storing the watch.
Plaintiff found a gold Rolex watch and cannot determine if Defendant 1 or Defendant 2 has a legitimate ownership claim over the watch. Plaintiff filed a complaint requesting the court to compel the Defendants to litigate their claims against each other in an interpleader action so Plaintiff can determine the rightful owner and receive compensation for storing the watch.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 1
COMPLAINT
PLAINTIFF, by counsel, respectfully states that:
1. Plaintiff and defendants are all of legal age; plaintiff resides at at 3
Rose st. Tondo Manila while defendants reside at at 4 Rose st. Tondo Manila and at 5 Rose st. Tondo Manila, respectively, where they may be served with pertinent notices; 2. On 1 June 2007, plaintiff found a Gold Rolex Oyster watch, without knowing who its true owner is. The watch is now in plaintiff’s possession. On or about 5 June 1999, defendants made similar representations to plaintiff as to ownership of the watch. 3. Plaintiff, who claims no interest in the watch, cannot determine the conflicting claims of defendants and thus seeks to compel defendants to interplead and litigate their several claims between themselves.
WHEREFORE, it is respectfully prayed that this Honorable Court issue
an order directing defendants to interplead with one another to determine their respective rights and claims and to allow plaintiff to recover his expenses for safekeeping and the costs of this suit, as first lien upon the subject matter of this action.