(A) Modernity and Social Changes in Europe and Emergence of Sociology
(A) Modernity and Social Changes in Europe and Emergence of Sociology
(A) Modernity and Social Changes in Europe and Emergence of Sociology
emergence of sociology
Sociology has a long past, but only a short history. The study of human society in scientific way is said to
have begun with August Comte. The emergence of sociology as a discipline of academic interest is of
recent origin. Its emergence as a discipline can be attributed to the vast changes that took place in the
nineteenth century.
b) artisans to produce
ARISTOTLE;
Ideal state is the one where laws are made and remade
J J Rousseau;
society must be driven by general will citizens must have the right to choose the sovereign
IDEOLOGIICAL TRANSFORMATION
INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION ;
OLD IDEAS FAIL TO GIVE SOLUTIONS TO THE NEW PROBLEMS IN THE SOCITY
FRENCH REVOLUTION;
AMERICAL REVOLUTIONS;
5) new society in old place 6) became root of frustration 7) increased social stress and strain
8) benefitting only minority 9) created the world of dissatisfaction and conflict 10) influenced
ideological .cultural .political .economic and social order
In order to address the social problems intellectuals begun to study society thus modernity and
subject matter of sociology are two sides of the same coin
(b) Scope of the subject and comparison with other
social sciences.
Scope of Sociology
There are two main schools of thought regarding the scope of Sociology: (1) The Specialist or
Formalistic school and (2) the Synthetic school. There is a good deal of controversy about the scope of
Sociology between the two schools. The supporter of first school believe that Sociology is a specific
science and the scope should be limited whereas others believe that it is a general science and its
scope is very vast
SPCIALIST SCHOOL
(v) Sociology need not study all the events connected with social science
Criticism:
(i) Sociologist alone does not study the forms of social relationships. Other social scientists also do
that.
(ii) the formalistic school has narrowed down the scope of Sociology.
SYNTHATIC SCHOOL:
The supporter; Durkheim, Comte, Sorokin, Spencer, F. Ward, and L.T. Hobhouse.
ACCORDING TO THEM
Conclusion:
From the above discussion, we come to know that formalistic school believes in the study of the parts,
which makes up the society and synthetic school advocates the study of the whole society. However,
both the schools complement to each other. They are not opposed to each other. Thus, Sociology is a
general science of society and specialised discipline. Sociology is a growing science. Therefore, it is
neither possible nor desirable to restrict its scope.
HISTORY;
POLITICAL SCIENCE ;
Science of governance
Rules of governance
Distribution of power
Sociology studies all societies including stateless societies and no primacy to any institutions through
field work at micro level attempts to generalize at macro level
ECONOMICS ;
PSYCHOLOGY ;
ANTHROPOLOGY;
COMMENCE SENCE ;
Perception of collectivity
Used to regulate behavior
Used to gather truth about the situation
Early thinker ; common sense is speculative and primitive
Criticized it as dogmas and superstition
ROBERT MADGE ;
People solve some problems by common sense and some by scientific knowledge
POSITIVISTS ;
Truth is verifiable .observable hence sociology can progress through scientific method only
expected behavior
‘’ Men is reflexive .culturally bound at the same time he is law bound and rationale he uses both
common science and science in different proportions .. social world is created and recreated by
humans offering respect to both science and common sense
Emergence of Sociology –