See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/327446334

Biogas generation from distillery spent wash by using an OPUR western

biotechnology process: a case study

Article  in  Desalination and water treatment · September 2018

DOI: 10.5004/dwt.2018.22404

CITATIONS READS

0 225

1 author:

Manoj Wagh
Padmashri Dr. Vithalrao Vikhe Patil College of Engineering
13 PUBLICATIONS   39 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

I am working on distillery wastewater, microbial calcite precipitation MICP, for your reference View project

3. To study the effect of Steel &polypropylenefibers on geopolymer concrete.Fibers View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Manoj Wagh on 28 May 2019.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

 Desalination and Water Treatment 118 (2018) 241–248
June
www.deswater.com
doi: 10.5004/dwt.2018.22404

Biogas generation from distillery spent wash by using an

OPUR western biotechnology process: a case study

Manoj Pandurang Wagha,*, Pravin Dinkar Nemadeb

a
Department of Civil Engineering, D.Y. Patil College of Technology Pimpri, Pune, Savitribai Phule Pune University,
Pune 411018, Maharashtra, India, Tel. +91 9766252452; email: profmpwagh@gmail.com
b
Department of Civil Engineering, S.B. Patil College of Engineering, Indapur, Savitribai Phule Pune University,
Pune 413106, Maharashtra, India, Tel. +91 9423975240; email: pravin.nemade@gmail.com

Received 16 October 2017; Accepted 25 April 2018

abstract
In India, sugar molasses are used on a large scale to manufacture ethanol. Global ethanol production in
2015 was around 224 crore L. While manufacturing ethanol, distillery wastewater generated is around
2,688 crore L, which affects terrestrial and aquatic ecosystem very badly. In the present paper, an
OPUR treatment process is studied to treat the distillery industry wastewater specially implemented
for Indian climatic condition. Distillery wastewaters treated by anaerobic digestion produces biogas as
a nonconventional energy source and controls the pollution; OPUR process reduces the COD around
from 140,000 to 38,500 mg L–1 (65%–72%), BOD reduction from 70,000 to 13,000 mg L–1 (80%–85%),
total dissolved solids reduction from 100,000 to 25,000 (75%), and biogas generation from 0.45 to
0.55 Nm3 kg–1 COD degraded. Calorific value is 4,500 kcal Nm–3, saving bagasse costs with biogas as
fuel, €4,891.5 per day, and total revenue generated €911,250 per year.
Keywords: OPUR process; Distillery spent wash; Fermentation; Biogas; Anaerobic digestion; Aerobic

1. Introduction wastewater, processed wastewater (biodigested effluent)

consisting fermenter sludge, spent less, spent wash and
Sugar molasses based distillery industries expel the tre-
lagoon effluent [8,9]. During ethanol production, spent wash
mendous quantity of high-strength wastewater, which is
is generated, and its characteristic depends on the feed of raw
highly hazardous to the environment and ecosystem. Spent
material [10]. The colour of distillery wastewater is mainly
wash generated from the distillery industry is one of the most
attributed due to alkaline degradation products of hexoses,
terrific risks that tackle humankind today [1,2]. Industries
caramels, polyphenols, and so on. Melanoidin has the empiri-
produce recalcitrant organic compounds, which cause malig-
cal formula C17–18H26–27O10N and low molecular weight (5,000–
nant colour and odour complication to terrestrial, aquatic
40,000) formed by Maillard reaction [11,12]. Raw spent wash
environment and ecosystem [3,4]. Distillery spent wash
generated during the ethanol, alcohol and rectified spirit
(DSW) is highly complex wastewater having high chemical
manufacturing is highly acidic, complicated, inconvenient,
oxygen demand (COD, 1,10,000–190,000 mg L–1), very high
caramel furfural and highly putrid [13,14]. Fig. 1 illustrates
biochemical oxygen demand (BOD, 35,000–70,000 mg L–1),
the spent wash generation path for the ­distillery plant during
total solids (82,480 mg L–1), nitrogen (2,200 mg L–1), phenolics
alcohol manufacturing.
(4.20 mg L–1), sulphate (3,410 mg L–1) and several heavy met-
BOD to COD ratio suggests biological treatment is the
als (Mn, Fe, Zn, Cd, Ni and Pb) [5–7]. Three types of effluent
primary treatment to treat the DSW followed by aerobic
are generated from distillery industries such as unprocessed
treatment methods to reduce pollution potential of raw
­
DSW [15,16]. Spent wash is treated by anaerobic digestion
* Corresponding author. to produce biogas. In an anaerobic digestion process, an
organic compound present in the spent wash is digested

1944-3994/1944-3986 © 2018 Desalination Publications. All rights reserved.

242 M.P. Wagh, P.D. Nemade / Desalination and Water Treatment 118 (2018) 241–248

Fig. 1. Spent wash generation path for the distillery plant during alcohol manufacturing.

by the microorganism (methanogens bacteria) to furnish

­biogas (methane 60% and CO2 40%). 1 m3 of spent wash gen-
erates 38–40 m3 of biogas. Fig. 2 indicates that the anaerobic
process is more effective than aerobic process, as in anaero-
bic digestion process, 90% waste is converted into methane
gas, and only 10% sludge is formed. In aerobic digestion
process, 50% sludge is formed; 50% heat is liberated; and
individual secondary treatment is required for the sludge
and effluent.
Anaerobic treatment consists single- and bi-phase anaer-
obic system, anaerobic lagoons, the high-rate anaerobic
reactor, anaerobic fixed anaerobic reactor, upflow anaerobic
sludge blanket (UASB) reactor and anaerobic fluidized bed
reactor [17]. Anaerobic treatment recovers substantial poten-
tial energy by biogas production and provides a stable pro-
cess for medium- and high-strength aqueous organic efflu-
ents other than minimizing the effluent load; the methane Fig. 2. Comparison of anaerobic and aerobic methods to treat dis-
generated is normally used as a fuel [18]. The aerobic pro- tillery spent wash.
cess was quite a bit accepted during the late 1960s to dispose
of the distillery effluent. The effluent was neutralized with
time and diluted for land irrigation. It creates problems like in the system as suspended growth or as a fixed filter reac-
land pollution, leachate generation and infertility of land. tor. As compared with the conventional biological process,
In 1970s, to counterbalance these problems, energy conser- anaerobic method is now being universally acknowledged as
vation became an important point of concern, and thus, an a better process for the treatment of wastewater. In this paper,
anaerobic digestion process has been developed, which was the performance of OPUR biotechnology has been initiated to
realized as an acceptable alternative as it generates biogas generate the biogas and minimize the pollution of the spent
[19]. Countries like India have established several large-scale wash by anaerobic treatment. This work also illustrates that
digesters to treat DSW; out of these, the first of its kind was how OPUR western biotechnology is more effective than
set up in 1979 at Vuyyuru, Krishna, Andhra Pradesh, India. UASB and fixed film reactor. It also insights typical design of
The anaerobic method is developed to retain the biomass the aerobic composting process.
 M.P. Wagh, P.D. Nemade / Desalination and Water Treatment 118 (2018) 241–248 243

2. Study area
Dr. Vitthalrao Vikhe Patil is the first co-operative sugar
mill situated in Ahmednagar, Maharashtra, India (Fig. 3).
The first co-operative distillery plant was started in 1970
with capacity of 15 KLPD, by Chemical Consultants and
Engineers, Ahmednagar. OPUR biotechnology (Sulzer tech-
nology) has been implemented to generate the biogas with
capacity of 60 KLPD in 1987. Mill first started biogas plant
and composting yard in Ahmednagar.

2.1. Sample analysis

The sample of DSW was collected from a Vikhe Patil dis-
tillery industry. Raw spent wash and biomethanted samples
were analyzed. Different parameters were determined such
as COD, BOD, pH, total dissolved solids (TDS), and so on in
triplicate as per the standard methods for the examination of
water and wastewater [20] (Table 1).

2.2. Process description (fermentation process)

In the fermentation process, molasses are carried out from
molasses storage tank(s) and brought into fermentation tank
no. 1. Yeast and nutrient such as diammonium phosphate
are added; pH of the tank is kept at 4–4.2; the temperature is
maintained at 32°C; and then, fermentation is permitted. At
that time, the material is transferred into fermentation tank Fig. 3. Location of Dr. Vitthalrao Vikhe Patil S.S.K. Ltd.,
no. 2 with dilution 1:2 ratio. At this stage, sludge is separated, ­Pravaranagar, Ahmednagar, Maharashtra, India.
and the clarified wash is then transferred into fermentation
tank no. 3. Clarified wash is further separated, and yeast
Table 1
cream is removed and transferred into fermentation tank Characteristics of Pravara distillery effluent before treatment [16]
nos. 1 and 2. In a clarified wash tank, the supernatant liquid
has been taken and delivered to distillation and wash distil- Parameter Concentration in ppm except pH
lation to stripper column (temperature 76°C). At this phase,
vapours proceed to condenser and reflux feed to extraction Colour Dark brown
column. In extraction column, impurities are separated; Odour Sugar smell
alcohol–water relays to rectifier column; and then, water is pH 4–4.5
drained, and rectified spirit (R.S.) is collected in a receiver COD 87,000–125,000
tank and then stored in the storage tank. R.S. contains 96% BOD 33,000–45,000
of alcohol; the vapours of R.S. are superheated up to 130°C TDS 65,000–100,000
with the pressure of 0.7 kg cm–2. The effluent initiated during
TSS 4,300–64,000
the distillery and brewery operations contains high organic
Acidity 5,300–8,200
loads.
Sulphate 13,300–14,100
Chlorides 4,650–8,450
2.3. Western biosystem (Sulzer), an OPUR process Total nitrogen 4,300–4,960
(primary treatment)
Anaerobic digestion offers potential energy recovery
through the generation of biogas and is a relatively stable pro- biogas digester (to collect the gas), degassing pond (to release
cess for medium- and high-strength aqueous organic efflu- the H2S and CO2 gas) and lamella clarifier unit work as a sed-
ents [21,22]. Apart from reducing a load of wastewater (BOD imentation unit. Table 2 indicates details of OPUR western
and COD), the methane produced from the anaerobic system biotechnology. COD degraded 65%–72% and BOD removal
can be used as a fuel for the partial or complete substitute for 80%–87% in OPUR treatment technology. Fig. 4 illustrates the
oil and coal [23]. India is perhaps one of the few countries in working process of OPUR western biotechnology.
the world to establish several commercial-scale digesters for The three biogas digesters are being used for treating
the production of methane gas from the DSW. An OPUR pro- about 900 m3 spent wash. Biogas generation depends on the
cess is an elegant anaerobic contact technique with the fully spent wash feed rate. In the month of July, biogas generation
mixed reactor (anaerobic activation process). The OPUR pro- rate is maximum 9,43,800 Nm3, as in the month of July, efflu-
cess consists of spent wash feed pump, heat exchanger (unit ent feed rate is maximum than another month. The indus-
to maintain the constant temperature during the process), try has also been getting the gas generation of about 45–55
244 M.P. Wagh, P.D. Nemade / Desalination and Water Treatment 118 (2018) 241–248

Nm3K L–1 spent wash, which is being used as fuel for boiler for the period April 2015–October 2015. Fig. 5 shows the pro-
and surplus to sugar boiler. Salient features of biogas plant file of concentration of feed COD entering the digester and
are shown in Table 3. the concentration of final COD of the effluent. The slightly
Table 4 illustrates a summary of average weekly observa- fluctuating nature of the COD concentration of the distillery
tions of feed COD, final COD, feed rate and biogas generation wastewater (98–104 g L–1) is evident from feed COD curve.
It is important to observe that the digester effluent COD
concentration remains reasonably consistent despite the
Table 2
OPUR western biotechnology details fluctuations in the COD of incoming wastewater. This also
reflects the capability of the system to perform in a very sta-
OPUR western biosystem ble manner.
The overall performance shows biogas generation rate
Number of reactor 4 of 28,127 m3 d–1, with specific biogas generation 0.45 Nm3
Reactor diameter 30 m kg–1 COD removal, based on 300 working days per year.
Sludge blanket zone 1.2 m A similar result has been produced by author Abdullah et
Height 14 m al. [24] that daily biogas generation was 55,760 m3 d–1 from
Hydraulic retention time, in days 5–6 d 1,394 m3 spent wash, and total electricity generation was
37.7 million kWh. A similar result has been illustrated by
Specific biogas generation, Nm3 kg–1 COD 0.45
author Aftab et al. [25] that 1-ton biomass anaerobically
COD reduction (%) 68%–70%
digested and 10 times diluted sugarcane molasses gener-
Total biogas generation, Nm3 d–1 35,000–40,000 ate 6.55 m3 biogas. The anaerobic process of winery efflu-
Biogas composition ent produces biogas 400–600 L kg–1 COD degraded with
CH4 65–70
60%–70% methane content [26]. The total volume of biogas
production was throughout 1,048,393 m3/year from a spent
CO2 20–25
wash of quantity 34,627,395 m3 [27]. Anaerobic digestion
H 2S 1.8 is one of the most efficient and effective renewable energy
Calorific value, kcal Nm–3 4,500 sources than other alternative nonconventional sources of
Steam generation energy, very less capital investment per unit manufacturing
cost [28].
Boiler efficiency (%) 85%
Steam enthalpy at 10 kg cm–2, kcal kg–1 180 MT d–1
Fuel saving 3. Secondary treatments (process of composting)
Steam from 1 MT of bagasse, MT The biomethanated distillery effluent has been treated in
Equivalent bagasse saving per day, MT d–1 90.440 MT the secondary effluent plant by the process of aerobic com-
Bagasse price Rs MT–1 2,500/MT posting. An aerobic biocomposting is the thermophilic pro-
Saving in bagasse costs with biogas as fuel, 2,26,100 cess, adopted by several Indian distilleries as it results in rich
Rs d–1 humus and can be utilized as a fertilizer [29]. Total effluent
is being consumed in the composting plant by using press
Number of working days per year 270–300
mud, waste bagasse and boiler ash as a filler material. The
Saving per year, Rs 60,750,000 composting cycle is of 4–5 weeks. The compaction is carried

Fig. 4. An OPUR process to treat distillery spent wash.

 M.P. Wagh, P.D. Nemade / Desalination and Water Treatment 118 (2018) 241–248 245

Table 3 out in such way that no leaching of the effluent from the
Salient features of biogas plant hips, and the moisture content in the hips is always main-
tained below 70%. Spent wash mixed with pressmud gives
Plant supplied M/s Western Bio-system Ltd., Pune, high fertile value pressmud, and bagasse-rich resources of
Sulzer Technology An OPUR Process COD are also reduced while using bacteria at temperature
Receiving pit 900 m3 d–1 65°C–700°C. The thermophilic bacteria can survive gener-
Digester 4 Nos. (total holding capacity, m3) ally in this temperature. The mesophilic bacteria can toler-
9,200 × 2 Nos. ate up to temperature 450°C and in the range of 15°C–450°C
secreting acids, and increasing temperature goes up to
6,300 × 2 Nos.
65°C–700°C. The mesophilic bacteria slow down, and the
Biogas digester in 3 Nos. (9,200 m3 × 2 Nos.) (working) thermophilic bacteria start to grow. Generally, composting
operation 1 No. (6,300 m3 × 1 Nos.) (standby) is possible at the 40% moisture. Microbial degraded organic
Loading rate 4.5–5 m3 kg COD m–3 matter of spent wash and carbon content of press mud fur-
Biogas generation 0.45–0.55 Nm3 kg–1 COD degraded ther convert organic matter into complex organic matter to
COD reduction 65%–72% compost. Characteristic of compost consists of N: 1.5%–2.5%,
BOD reduction 80%–85% P: 2%–3% and K: 2%–2.5%.

Table 4
Performance of an OPUR system during April–October 2015

Week Average feed Feed COD Final COD COD reduction Biogas generation
rate (m3 d–1) (g L–1) (g L–1) (%) (m3)
1. 720 102 29 71.57 24,457
2. 724 102 30 70.59 24,500
3. 696 103 28 72.8 24,571
4. 682 101 29 71.29 25,157
5. 675 100 30 70.00 21,700
6. 716 98 31 68.37 26,714
7. 720 98 30 69.39 27,486
8. 720 98 29 70.41 28,357
9. 720 99 28 71.72 28,071
10. 744 102 29 71.57 29,157
11. 754 101 30 70.30 29,771
12. 768 101 29 71.29 29,700
13. 768 98 31 68.37 30,129
14. 768 99 29 70.71 30,343
15. 768 102 29 71.57 30,029
16. 768 101 30 70.30 30,571
17. 768 99 30 69.70 30,686
18. 768 104 31 70.19 29,300
19. 768 99 28 71.72 30,129
20. 757 98 29 70.41 30,086
21. 744 101 30 70.30 30,314
22. 744 102 31 69.61 30,057
23. 740 102 31 69.61 30,314
24. 745 100 30 70.00 30,843
25. 727 101 31 70.00 27,100
26. 684 99 29 70.70 27,657
27. 606 98 29 70.41 23,986
28. 635 98 29 70.40 29,914
29. 601 98 28 71.43 28,829
30. 519 98 29 70.41 23,871
Average 717 100 29.50 70.50 28,127
246 M.P. Wagh, P.D. Nemade / Desalination and Water Treatment 118 (2018) 241–248

3.1. Design of compost yard 4. Conclusions

The design of compost yard depends on the quantity of The following conclusions are drawn from the present
pressmud, bagasse and biodigested spent wash. Space width study:
of each windrow is 1.9 m. 1 ton of 65% moisture pressmud
requires about 2 m length (based on field trial). Hence, 100 • OPUR western biosystem was impressive to handle the
tons of pressmud requires the length of 200 m. Each wind- DSW; daily ethanol production capacity was 110 KLPD. 1 L
row is 176 m long, with 7 m on either side for vehicle turning of ethanol production generates 13 L of spent wash, which
and 5 m either side for canal and piping. 176 m of windrow means daily 1.43 million L of spent wash is generated.
can hold 0.88 d of production. 25 d of processing requires 29 • COD and BOD value of raw spent wash was very high in
windrows. Hence, the total width of compost yard is 55 m. the influent, but after the OPUR treatment, it reduces up
Land required to process 100 TPD of pressmud is 2.7 acres. to 72% and 85%, respectively, with specific biogas gener-
Fig. 6 shows the layout of compost yard. ation of 0.45–0.55 Nm3 kg–1 COD removal.

Fig. 5. Profile of weekly average feed and final values and biogas generation rates.

Fig. 6. Compost yard to dispose of the spent wash and pressmud.

 M.P. Wagh, P.D. Nemade / Desalination and Water Treatment 118 (2018) 241–248 247

• Biogas generation contains 65%–70% methane (CH4), fuel for the steam generation has been estimated to be €91,125
20%–25% carbon dioxide (CO2), 1.8% hydrogen sulphide per annum. The biogas system has also proved to be profit-
(H2S) and a small quantity of moisture. able with a capital cost of €375,000. Plant saves daily 90.440
• COD reduces from 87,000 ppm to 20,000 ppm. MT bagasse; bagasse costs is reduced by using biogas as fuel,
• BOD minimizes up to 4,500 ppm; pH of treated effluent €4,891.5 per day; total revenue generated is €911,250 per year.
is 7.2–7.8. Energy generation of another plant is very high as com-
• OPUR western biosystem is having benefits throughout pared with other renewable energy sources: capital cost of
other technology processes of biogas generation such as small hydropower plant is €7,50,000–€9,00,000, and esti-
UASB and fixed film reactor that are indicated in Table 5. mated cost of generation of 1 kWh is €0.0225–€0.0375; capital
cost of wind power is €6,00,000–€7,50,000, and estimated cost
During the period of April–September, plant was run- of generation of 1 kWh is €0.03–€0.045; capital cost of biomass
ning at 100% capacity due to the simultaneous supply of power is €6,00,000, and estimated cost of 1 kWh is €0.0375–
molasses. From the month of October, the amount of spent €0.0525; and capital cost of bagasse cogeneration is €5,25,000,
wash was decreased due to deficiency of molasses. The total and estimated cost of generation of 1 kWh is €0.0375–€0.045
spent wash feed during these months was 152,855 m3, and [30]. Fixed film reactor technology has been implemented
the average spent wash feed was 28,127 m3. The cost saving to molasses-based distillery by applying organic loading of
through the replacement of bagasse (when available) as fuel 22 kg COD m–3 d–1, which gives COD reduction 71.8% and
for the steam generation has proved to be profitable with biogas generation 0.45 m3 kg–1 COD [31]. Hence, anaerobic
payback period less than 2 years. OPUR western biotech- digestion is proved to be a primary treatment to distillery
nology is in operation for the last 3 decades and gives satis- effluent with very high energy potential.
factory performance with respect to biogas generation and The authors also illustrate that the quantity of effluent
increased COD removal efficiency. This shows that anaerobic produced by anaerobic treatment will not be sufficient to
digestion technology can remove up to 69% of COD and offer fulfill discharge requirement and required additional treat-
very economical option to solve the effluent treatment prob- ment technologies to dispose of the cumbersome complex
lems of the distillery. Cost saving through the replacement effluent. Several distilleries in India follow aerobic treatment
of bagasse (when insufficient or not available) by biogas as a as a secondary process to treat the biomethanated effluent

Table 5
Comparison of OPUR western bioprocess with UASB and fixed film reactor

Parameter UASB Fixed film OPUR biosystem (Sulzer’s CSTR)

Biomass form Pellets, granules Biogas film Flocky structure
Start-stop Effects formation of pellets Chances of clogging or channel- Perfect due to adjustable hydrau-
­capability ling of filter bed lic system
Tolerance of SS in Less tolerance Clogging of filter bed Wide tolerance
the influent
Capability of No segregation of suspended No segregation system Excellent due to lamella clarifier
solid/water biomass
separation
Tolerance to pH Poor tolerance as needed plug Vast tolerance due to excessive Extensive tolerance
variation in the flow for pellet formation recycling rate
influent
Process stability Crucial depending upon changes Poor stability due to accumula- Good stability due to biomass
in influent characteristics tion of filter bed segregation system
Required skill for Not required Required Not required
operation
Eliminate of Complicated Complicated due to clogging Easily feasible
sullage filter bed
Hazardous of bio- Possible Not possible Not possible
mass washout
Retention time 8–10 d 8–10 d 18–20 d
Addition of alkali Necessary due to less retention Necessary due to short retention No need due to high retention
time and less tolerance to pH period time and sludge recycling
variation
Safety of feed Sensitive due to nozzles Good due to effluent recycling Better as homogeneous mixing by
distribution agitators
system
248 M.P. Wagh, P.D. Nemade / Desalination and Water Treatment 118 (2018) 241–248

(anaerobically digested effluent). Aerobic process is capable [13] M.P. Wagh, P.D. Nemade, Treatment processes and technologies
of reducing 90% BOD and has rich humus, which is used as for decolourization and COD removal of distillery spent wash:
a review, Int. J. Innov. Res. Adv. Eng., 2 (2015) 30–40.
a fertilizer. However, the effluent will still contain the high
[14] M.P. Wagh, P.D. Nemade, Treatment of distillery spent wash by
appreciable level of COD and the intense colour, which poses using chemical coagulation (CC) and electro-coagulation (EC),
a serious problem in its disposal. Hence, advanced treatment Am. J. Environ. Prot., 3 (2015) 159–163.
technologies are required for the disposal of effluent. [15] A. Kansal, R.K. Prasad, S. Gupta, Delhi municipal solid waste
and environment – an appraisal, Indian J. Environ. Prot., 18
(1998) 123–128.
Acknowledgement [16] M.P. Wagh, P.D. Nemade, Colour and COD removal of distillery
spent wash by using electrocoagulation, Int. J. Eng. Res. Gen.
The authors would like to express sincere thanks to the Sci., 3 (2015) 1159–1173.
principal of D.Y. Patil College of Technology, Pimpri, Pune, [17] R. Sowmeyan, G. Swaminathan, Effluent treatment process in
and Savitribai Phule Pune University for sanctioning the molasses-based distillery industries, a review, J. Hazard. Mater.,
research fund. Special thanks to Dr. Sujay Vikhe, CEO of Dr. 152 (2008) 453–462.
[18] Y.Q. Tang, Y. Fujimura, T. Shigematsu, S. Morimura, K. Kida,
Vikhe Patil distillery plant, and Dr. R.K. Jain. Anaerobic treatment performance and microbial population of
thermophilic upflow anaerobic filter reactor treating awamori
distillery wastewater, J. Biosci. Bioeng., 104 (2007) 281–287.
References [19] Y. Satyawali, M. Balakrishnan, Wastewater treatment in
[1] A.R. Santal, N.P. Singh, B.S. Saharan, A novel application of molasses-based alcohol distilleries for COD and color removal,
Paracoccus pantotrophus for the decolourization of melanoidins a review, J. Environ. Manage., 86 (2008) 481–497.
from distillery effluent under static conditions, J. Environ. [20] American Publication Health Association,. Standard Methods
Manage., 169 (2016) 78–83. for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 20th Ed., APHA,
[2] C. David, M. Arivazhagan, M. Ibrahim, Spent wash New York, 2008.
decolourization using nano-Al2O3/kaolin photocatalyst: Taguchi [21] B.K. Acharya, S. Mohana, D. Madamwar, Anaerobic treatment
and ANN approach, J. Saudi Chem. Soc., 19 (2015) 537–548. of distillery spent wash—a study on upflow anaerobic fixed
[3] P. Asaithambi, M. Susree, R. Saravanathamizhan, M. film bioreactor, Bioresour. Technol., 99 (2008) 4621–4626.
Matheswaran, Ozone assisted electrocoagulation for treatment [22] X.L. Melamane, R. Tandlich, J.E. Burgess, Treatment of wine
of distillery effluent, Desalination, 297 (2012) 1–7. distillery wastewater by high rate anaerobic digestion, Water
[4] M.P. Wagh, P.D. Nemade, An influence of experimental Sci. Technol., 56 (2007) 9–16.
parameters in the treatment of anaerobically treated distillery [23] Biradar, A Physicochemical and Biological Methods for the
spent wash by using ozone assisted electrocoagulation, Desal. Treatment of Post Anaerobic Distillery Spent Wash, PhD Thesis,
Wat. Treat., 83 (2017) 7–15. Centre for Environmental Science and Engineering, Indian
[5] R. Chandra, Biodegradation of distillery effluent: isolation and Institute of Technology, Bombay, 2003.
characterization of a microbial consortium, Indian J. Environ. [24] Y. Abdullah, A. Ali, A.B. Tabinda, A. Tahir, Waste to energy
Prot., 16 (1996) 352–355. analysis of Shakarganj sugar mills, biogas production from the
[6] R. Chandra, K. Kumar, J. Singh, Impact of anaerobically spent wash for electricity generation, Renew. Sustain. Energy
treated and untreated (raw) distillery effluent irrigation on soil Rev., 43 (2015) 126–132.
microflora, growth, total chlorophyll and protein contents of [25] T. Aftab, J. Iqbal, K. Iqbal, S. Aslam, R. Ahmad, Production of
Phaseolus aureus L., J. Environ. Biol., 25 (2004) 381–385. biogas from an agro-industrial waste and its characteristics, J.
[7] S. Mohana, C. Desai, D. Madamwar, Biodegradation and Sci. Res., 6 (2014) 347–357.
decolorization of anaerobically treated distillery spent wash [26] R. Moletta, Winery and distillery wastewater treatment by
by a novel bacterial consortium, Bioresour. Technol., 98 (2007) anaerobic digestion, Water Sci. Technol., 51 (2005) 137–144.
333–339. [27] National Master Plan for Development of Waste-to-Energy in
[8] K. Sankaran, M. Premalatha, M. Vijayasekaran, V.T. India, Structured Urban and Industrial Database, 2007.
Somasundaram, DEPHY project: distillery wastewater treatment [28] P. Venkateswara Rao, S.S. Baral, R. Dey, S. Mutnuri, Biogas
through anaerobic digestion and phycoremediation—A green generation potential by anaerobic digestion for sustainable
industry approach, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 37 (2014) energy development in India, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 14
634–643. (2010) 2086–2094.
[9] A.K. Prajapati, P.K. Chaudhari, Physicochemical treatment of [29] Y. Satyawali, M. Balakrishnan, Wastewater treatment in
distillery wastewater—a review, Chem. Eng. Commun., 202 molasses-based alcohol distilleries for COD and colour removal
(2015) 1098–1117. a review, J. Environ. Manage., 86 (2008) 481–497.
[10] D. Pant, A. Adholeya, Biological approaches for the treatment [30] P. Schroder, R. Herzig, B. Bojinov, A. Ruttens, E. Nehnevajova,
of distillery wastewater: a review, Bioresour. Technol., 98 (2007) S. Stamatiadis, Bioenergy to save the world producing novel
2321–2334. energy plants for growth on abandoned land, Environ. Sci.
[11] M.M. Arimi, Y. Zhang, G. Gotz, K. Kiriamiti, S.-U. Geißen, Pollut. Res., 15 (2008) 196–204.
Antimicrobial colorants in molasses distillery wastewater and [31] R. Seth, S.K. Goyal, B.K. Handa, Fixed film biomethanation
their removal technologies, Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad., 87 of distillery spent wash using low-cost porous media, Resour.
(2014) 34–43. Conserv. Recycl., 14 (1995) 79–89.
[12] M.P. Wagh, P.D. Nemade, Biodegradation of anaerobically
treated distillery spent wash by Aspergillus species from a
distillery effluent contaminated site, Desal. Wat. Treat., 104
(2018) 234–240.

View publication stats