Applications of Health Psychology
Applications of Health Psychology
Applications of Health Psychology
Getting people to follow medical advice and adhere to their treatment regimens is a
difficult task for health psychologists. People often forget to take their pills or are
inhibited by the side effects of their medicines. Failing to take prescribed medication is
costly and wastes millions of usable medicines that could otherwise help other people.
Estimated adherence rates are difficult to measure (see below); there is, however,
evidence that adherence could be improved by tailoring treatment programs to
individuals' daily lives.[21]
• Counting the number of pills in the medicine bottle - although this has problems
with privacy and/or could be deemed patronizing or showing lack of trust in
patients
• Using self-reports - although patients may fail to return the self-report or lie about
their adherence
• Asking a doctor or health worker - although this presents problems on doctor-
patient confidentiality
• Using 'Trackcap' bottles, which track the number of times the bottle is opened;
however, this either raises problems of informed consent or, if informed consent
is obtained, influence through demand characteristics.[22]
in philosophy, any theory that mind and body are distinct kinds of substances or natures.
This position implies that mind and body not only differ in meaning but refer to different
kinds of entities. Thus, a dualist would oppose any theory that identifies mind with the
brain, conceived as a physical mechanism.
The modern problem of the relationship of mind to body stems from the thought of René
Descartes, a 17th-century French philosopher and mathematician, who gave dualism its
classical formulation. Beginning from his famous Cogito, ergo sum (Latin: “I think,
therefore I am”), Descartes developed a theory of mind as an immaterial, nonextended
substance that engages in various activities such as rational thought, imagining, feeling,
and willing. Matter, or extended substance, conforms to the laws of physics in
mechanistic fashion, with the important exception of the human body, which Descartes
believed is causally affected by the human mind and which causally produces certain
mental events. For example, willing the arm to be raised causes it to be raised, whereas
being hit by a hammer on the finger causes the mind to feel pain. This part of Descartes’s
dualistic theory, known as interactionism, raises one of the chief problems faced by
Descartes: the question how this causal interaction is possible.
This problem gave rise to other varieties of dualism, such as occasionalism and some
forms of parallelism that do not require direct causal interaction. Occasionalism
maintains that apparent links between mental and physical events are the result of God’s
constant causal action. Parallelism also rejects causal interaction but without constant
divine intervention. Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, a 17th-century German rationalist and
mathematician, saw mind and body as two perfectly correlated series, synchronized like
two clocks at their origin by God in a preestablished harmony.
"For centuries and long before the first glimmerings of modern science,
physicians and non-physicians alike have acknowledged that the way
people felt in their minds could influence the way they responded in their
bodies. When prevailing medical theory denied the very possibility of such
interactions, common experience and sometimes quite startling clinical
encounters suggested otherwise."[32]
The humanistic revival of classical art, architecture, literature, and learning that
originated in Italy and later spreads throughout Europe. "Ideas about the 'balance of
the passions' were popular in the Renaissance and early modern
periods."[34]
The system of medicine prevailing in the Colonies in the years immediately preceding the
American Revolution, was that of the Dutch physician and teacher Hermann Boerhaave
(1668-1738). The Boerhaavian theory of disease explained it in terms of chemical and
physical qualities, such as acidity and alkalinity, or tension and relaxation. The
Boerhaavian system was increasingly being challenged in the second half of the 18th
century by the theories of William Cullen (1710-1790), a Scottish physician and teacher.
Cullen held that an excess or an insufficiency of nervous tension was the cause of all
disease. Too much tension was often characterized by a fever, to be treated by a
depleting regiment including bleeding, a restricted diet, purging, and rest and sedation. A
cold or chill, on the other hand, indicated too much relaxation and called for restorative
measures
Postbellum America
Health care is centered on the individual practitioner, rather than on the institution or in
science.
The pace of life begins to speed up. People began to notice how the acceleration of the
perception of the duration of time and the apparent shortening of physical distances was
inducing stress in them. Americans who lived through the second half of the
nineteenth century experienced the greatest, most fundamental changes ever
experienced by mankind: electricity, telephone, telegraph, and the railroad.[1]
Western notions of stress was a direct consequence of theses technological accelerations
that began to really take off during the second half of the 19th century. People in our
modern times have to do more things, with less and less time to do them in.
"The late 19th century spawned the psychoanalytical enterprise, the shift
from priest to therapist, and the abnegation of personal responsibility in
the face of social turmoil. By medicalizing neurosis, the early
psychologists and physicians initiated a disturbing trend that has now
reached crisis proportions."[17] "By the turn of the 20th century,
neurasthenia had become a medical phenomenon on both sides of the
Atlantic and neurologists found themselves sharing authority over the
illness. Homeopaths, eclectics, general practitioners, and gynecologists in
Europe and America tried their hand at treating the condition, each putting
their discipline's own spin on the illness. ... Cases of neurasthenia reached
a peak near the turn of the 20th century, and by the 1930s fewer and fewer
physicians were diagnosing the disease. There are a number of
explanations for this decline, including modern medicine's abandonment
of the 'nervous energy' model of health and the rise of Freud's
psychoanalysis as a way of explaining and treating psychosomatic
disorders."[4]