Traditional Bases For Pay
Traditional Bases For Pay
Traditional Bases For Pay
Traditional pay systems sets pay levels in a narrow band with regular annual
increases. There may be 3 to 4 percent pay increase annually. Increases are meant for
promotions, merit, and cost of living. There is less distinction between merit increases
and cost of living increases.
Because of the low levels (3 to 4 percent) of salary budget funding, most people
are familiar with. Often, it includes a set salary or wage, a set schedule for merit
increases, and a set benefits package.
Seniority Pay
Rewards employees with periodic additions to base pay according to employee's
length of service in performing their jobs. These pay plans assume that employees
become more valuable to companies with time and that valued employees will leave if
they do not have a clear idea that their salaries will progress over time. Designed to
award job tenure. Employees perceive that they are treated fairly. Facilitates
administration of pay. Poor fit with most competitive strategies.
Longevity Pay
Designed to reduce employee turnover and pay grade maximum for length of
service. Used for most government employees. General schedule system for federal
employees.
Characteristics:
Same principle as seniority pay
Longevity pay designed to: Addresses pay of employees pay of employees who
reach maximum pay grade rates based on seniority.
Rewards employees with periodic pay increases that do not become part of base
pay
Used for most government employees
General schedule system for federal employees
General Schedule
Classifies federal government jobs into 15 classifications based on such factors
as skill, education, and experience levels. Employees are eligible for 10 with-grade pay
increases. The waiting periods within steps: Steps 1-3: 1 year. Steps 4-6: 2 Years.
Steps 7-9: 3 years.
Trait Systems
Ask raters to evaluate each employee's traits or characteristics.
Comparison Systems
Evaluate a given employee's performance against that of other employees. Rates
and ranks performance and pay raises based on ranking
Forced Distribution
Assigns employees to groups that represent the entire range of performance.
Paired Comparisons
Supervisors compare each employee to every other employee, identifying the
better performer in each pair
Behavioral Systems
Rate employees on the extent to which they display successful job performance
behaviors. In contrast to trait and comparison methods, behavioral methods rate
objective job behaviors.
Types of Behavioral Systems (3)
Critical Incident Technique (CIT)
Employees and supervisor identify and label job behaviors and results
Supervisors observe and record
Requires extensive documentation
Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scales (BARS)
Based on 8-10 expected job behaviors
Employees rated on ability to perform each behavior \
Ratings highly defensible
Encourage all rates to make evaluations in similar ways
Behavioral Observation Scale (BOS)
Contrast Errors
Takes place when rater compares employees to other employees rather than
specific employee standards.
Leniency Errors
Managers rate employees' performance more highly than they would rate them using
objective criteria. Causes employees to believe that they deserve higher raises than
they actually do.
Strictness Errors
Managers rate employees' performance lower than they would rate them using
objective criteria.