Elective
Elective
Elective
Many patients suffer unnecessarily when they do not receive adequate attention for the
symptoms accompanying serious illness. Careful evaluation of the patient should include not only
the physical problems but also the psychosocial and spiritual dimensions of the patient’s and
family’s experience of serious illness.
COMMUNICATION
Remarkable strides have been made in the ability to prolong life, but attention to care for
the dying lags behind each of us will eventually face death, and most would agree that one’s own
demise is a subject he or she would prefer not to contemplate. Indeed, Glaser and Strauss (1965)
noted that unwillingness in our culture to talk about the process of dying is tied to our discomfort
with the notion of particular deaths-those of our patients and our own-rather than death in the
abstract. Finucane (2002) observed that our struggle to stay alive is a prerequisite to being human.
Confronting death in our patients uncovers our own deeply rooted fears.
To develop a level of comfort and expertise in communication with seriously and terminally
ill patients and their families:
Nurses and other clinicians should first consider their own experiences with and values
concerning illness and death.
Reflection, reading, and talking with family members, friends, and colleagues can help
nurses examine beliefs about death and dying.
Talking with people from different cultural backgrounds can help nurses view personally
held beliefs through a different lens and can help nurses become sensitive to death-related
beliefs and practices in other cultures. Discussion with nursing and non-nursing colleagues
can also be useful; it may reveal the values shared by many health care professionals and
identify diversity in the values of patients in their care.
Values clarification and personal death awareness exercise can provide a starting point for
self-discovery and discussion.
Nurses need to develop skill and comfort in assessing patients’ and families’ responses to
serious illness and planning interventions that will support their values and choices throughout
the continuum of care. Patients and families need ongoing assistance. Throughout the course of a
serious illness, patients and their families encounter complicated treatment decisions, bad news
about disease progression, and recurring emotional responses.
In addition to the time of initial diagnosis, lack of response to the treatment course,
decisions to continue or withdraw particular interventions, and decisions about hospice care are
examples of critical points on the treatment continuum that demand patience, empathy, and
honesty from nurses.
Discussing sensitive issues such as serious illness, hopes for survival, and fears associated
with death is never easy. However, the art of therapeutic communication can be learned and, like
other skills, must be practiced to gain expertise. Similar to the other skills, communication should
be practiced in a safe setting.
Although communication with each patient and family should be tailored to their particular
level of understanding and values concerning disclosure, general guidelines for nurses include the
following (Addington, 1991):
Deliver and interpret the technical information necessary for making decisions without
hiding behind medical terminology.
Realize that the best time for the patient to talk may be when it is least convenient for you.
Being fully present during any opportunity for communication is often the most helpful form
of communication
Allow the patient and family to set the agenda regarding the depth of the conversation.
Patients often direct questions or concerns to nurses before they have been able to fully
discuss the details of their diagnosis and prognosis with their physicians or the entire health care
team.
Using open ended questions allows the nurse to elicit the patient’s and family’s concerns,
explore misconception and needs for information, and form the basis for collaboration with
physicians and other team members.
In one case, a seriously ill patient may ask the nurse, “Am I dying?”
o The nurse should avoid making unhelpful responses that dismiss the patient’s real
concerns or defer the issue to another car provider.
o The nurse could establish eye contact and follow with a statement acknowledging the
patient’s fears and an open-ended statement or question.
As a member of the interdisciplinary team caring for the patient at the end of life, the nurse
plays an important role in facilitating the team’s understanding of the patient’s values and
preferences, family dynamics concerning decision making, and the family’s response to treatment
and changing health status. The nurses can help the patient and family clarify their values and
preferences concerning end-of-life care by using structured approach. Nurses may need to plan
several meetings to accomplish the four steps described the table below.
4. Contribute to the Provide guidance and/or referral for understanding medical options
interdisciplinary care Make recommendations for referrals to other disciplines or services
plan Identify need for patient/family teaching
Develop a plan for follow-up:
o Schedule
o Participants
o Tasks/ assignments
o Communication that needs to occur before the next meeting
o Family member responsible for coordination
REFERENCE: Brunner & Suddarth’s Textbook of Medical-Surgical Nursing 11th Edition Volume 1
1. Empathy
o Is the ability to enter into another person’s experience to perceive it accurately and
to understand how situation is viewed from the client’s perspective.
o Empathy is a complex process, The nurse should:
Have enough knowledge and experience to perceive the client’s
perspective accurately.
Feel secure enough not to be intimated if client experiences a situation
differently.
Feel comfortable enough to be able to imagine what a situation might be
like someone else, while remaining outside that situation to maintain
objectivity.
Convey to the client that the nurse perceives that client’s feelings, thoughts
and experiences accurately.
o Simple action such as touch, kindness, attentiveness and information sharing also
signify empathy.
2. Positive Regard
o Refers to warmth, caring, interest and respect for the person, seeing the person
unconditionally or non-judgmentally.
o Respect or the person does not mean that the nurse accepts all aspects of a
person’s behavior.
3. Comfortable Sense of Self
o Before a nurse can communicate therapeutically, a comfortable sense of self, such
as being aware of one’s own personality, values, cultural background and style of
communication, is necessary.
The nurse with comfortable sense of self can evaluate his/her work strength
and weaknesses.
Self-evaluation also means taking responsibility for one’s actions as a
professional.
A person with a comfortable sense of self is open to experiences and is
aware of his/her feelings and attitudes.
The professional with comfortable sense of self feels separate from others,
an important aspect of being therapeutic.
Being therapeutic with one’s self is necessary before one can be therapeutic
with others.
Illness is a highly personal state in which the person’s physical, emotional. Intellectual,
social, developmental, or spiritual functioning is thought to be diminished.
Effects of Illness
Illness brings about change in both the involved individual and in the family. The changes
vary depending on the nature, severity, and duration of the illness, attitudes associated with the
illness by the client and others, the financial demands, lifestyle changes incurred, adjustments to
usual roles, and so on.
A. Impact on Client
o Ill clients may experience behavioral and emotional changes, changes in self-concept and
body image.
o All individuals are also vulnerable to loss of autonomy (state of being independent without
outside control)
Nurses Role:
Nurses need to help clients express their thoughts and feelings, and to provide care
that helps the client effectively cope with change.
Nurses need to support client’s right to self-determination and autonomy as much as
possible.
Nurses need to help patient adjust their lifestyle.
Nurses committed to family-centered care involved both the ailing individual and the
family in the nursing process.
Nurses make sure that not only the individual but also each family member
understands the disease, its management, and the effect of these factors on family
functioning.
Nurses help families cope with the realities of the illness and the changes it may have
brought about, which may include new roles and functions of family members or the
need to provide continued medical care to the ill or recovering person.
It is a critical skill for nursing. It is the process by which humans meet their survival needs,
build relationships and experience joy. In nursing, communication is used to gather information,
to teach and persuade, and to express caring and Comfort. Comforting is the process by which
nurses assist clients and significant other to face the distress and discomforts they may encounter.
In nursing, Communication is an integral part of the helping relationship.
CARING
COMFORTING
Comforting Process
Comfort
o Physical comfort needs to relate to bodily sensations and the physiologic problems
associated with the medical diagnosis.
o Psychospiritual comfort needs relate to the internal awareness of self, esteem, concept,
sexuality and meaning in one’s life.
o Social comfort needs relate to interpersonal, family, and social relationships.
o Environmental comfort needs relate to the external background of human experience
and can include light, noise, ambience, color, temperature and natural versus synthetic
elements.
Comfort Measures
Comfort measures may be provided both directly to the client and indirectly through other
personnel, family, or environment. Comfort measures are initiated when the nurse perceives
client distress or discomfort or the client indicates a specific need for comforting.
-Philosophy of and system for delivering care that expands on traditional medical care for serious,
progressive illness to include a focus on quality of life, function, decision making, and opportunities
for personal growth.
-an approach to care and a structured system for care delivery that aims to “prevent and relieve
suffering” and to support the best possible quality of life for patients and their families, regardless
of the stage of the disease or the need for other therapies.
-in palliative care, interdisciplinary collaboration is necessary to bring out the desired outcomes
for patients and their families. Interdisciplinary collaboration is based on communication and
cooperation among the various disciplines, with each member of the team contributing to a single
integrated care plan that addresses the needs of the patient and family.
All hospice care is palliative care; however, not all palliative care is hospice care. The difference is
that the hospice care is an application of palliative care delivered at the end of life. Hospice care
focus on quality of life, and by necessity, it usually includes realistic emotional, social, spiritual, and
financial preparation for death. The palliative approach to care could benefit many more patients
if it were available across care settings and earlier in the disease process.
The following characteristics are those traditionally used to refer to a community hospice setting,
however, many may be applicable for care in other settings.
1. Patient-centered
The comfort of the patient is the primary concern. Diagnosis and pathology are important
but primarily for understanding the basis of symptoms and how to relieve them, and for
assessing prognosis.
2. Family/friend-centered
The patient is seen as an integral part of a larger unit, which is the network of family and
friends. In crisis situations, family dynamics are often strained. One of the tasks of hospice
team members is to distinguish between problems which are clearly those for the patient,
and others which may stem from discomforts being experienced by other members of the
family. Family conferences are often very valuable in clarifying such tensions.
3. Comprehensive
Care attends to the physical, emotional and spiritual needs of the patient and family. It
addresses fear and anger as well as pain, recognizing the emotional associations of physical
Source:
Brunner & Suddarth’s Textbook of Medical-surgical Nursing 13th edition, Hinkle J.L., Cheever K.H.
https://hopewell.org.au/your-family/what-palliative-care/characteristics-palliative-care
Communication is the process of conveying information through various complex verbal and
nonverbal behaviors.
1. Communicators are people who simultaneously send and receive messages through words
and nonverbal actions
Examples: nodding, eye contact, facial expressions, posture).
2. Encoding is the process by which a communicator put into words or behaviors the ideas or
feeling that he or she is trying to convey.
Examples: shouting, crying, looking away, and choosing particular words.
5. Feedback is the discernible responses that a receiver makes to a sender’s message. All
behaviors, including silence, ignoring, are forms of feedback.
6. Environment refers to the personal experiences that each communicator brings to the
interaction.
Therapeutic communication – occurs when the nurse demonstrate empathy uses effective
communication skills, and responds to the client’s thoughts needs and concerns. This planned
process allows nurse and client to build a trusting relationship in which the client is free to express
thoughts, feelings, and options without fear or judgment.
Nontherapeutic communication - develop when nurses respond in ways that cause clients feel
defensive, misunderstood, controlled, minimized, alienated, or discouraged from expressing
thoughts and feelings. Although most people use nontherapeutic responses in everyday
communication, it is important to be aware of how these responses deter open discussion and
increase the like hood of withdrawal by clients. Learning the labels for non-therapeutic responses
helps nurses to recognize and avoid them.
MACATANGAY, ARLENE
BSN 3
BRAVO, ROSEDEL
BSN 3
ELECTIVE COURSE I
SUBMITTED TO:
SUBMITTED BY:
ALONZO, JEVERLYN
BRAVO, ROSEDEL
BULLIONAN, LIZA
CALLANG, DAWN GELLINE
MACARUBBO, RESSIE CATHERINE
MACATANGAY, ARLENE
MANANGPA, LIGAYA
MAGO, IRENE JESSICA
NAVARRETE, GEOFFRIEY SANDLER
PAGGAD, HECY
SAGUN, MARC EROLL
SALAZAR, FROILAN
VALDEZ, ROSELYN
BSN - 3
A.Y 2018-2019
Denial, sadness, anger, fear, and anxiety are normal grief reaction in people with life
threatening illness and those close to them. Kubler-Ross (1969) described five common emotional
to dying that are applicable to the experience to loss. Not every patient or family member
experiences every stage; many patients never reach a stage of acceptance, and patients and
families fluctuate on sometimes daily basis in their emotional responses. Furthermore, although
impending loss stresses the patient, people who are close to him or her, and the functioning of
the family unit, awareness of dying also provides a unique opportunity for family members to
reminisce, resolve relationships, plan for the future, and say goodbye
Individual and family coping with the anticipation of death is complicated by the varied and
conflicting trajectories that grief and mourning may assume in families. For example, the patient
may be experiencing sadness while contemplating for changes that have been brought about by
the illness and the patient’s spouse or partner may be expressing or suppressing feelings of anger
about the current changes in role and impending loss of the relationship. Others in the family may
be engage in denial (e.g. “dad will get better; he just needs to eat more”), fear (“ho will take care
of us.” Or “will I get sick too”), or profound sadness and withdrawal. Although each of these
behaviors is normal, tension may arise when one or more family members perceive that others
are less caring, too emotional, or too detached.
The nurse should assess the characteristics of the family system and intervene in a manner
that supports and enhances the cohesion of the family unit. Parameters for assessing the family
facing life-threatening are identified in Chart 17-12. The nurse can suggest that family members
talk about their feelings and understand them in the border context of anticipatory grief and
mourning. Acknowledging and expressing feelings, continuing to interact with the patient in
meaningful ways, and planning for the time of death and bereavement are adaptive family
behaviors. Professional support provided by grief counselors, whether in the community, at a local
hospital, in the long-term care facility, or associated with a hospice program, can help both the
patient and the family sort out and acknowledge feelings and make the end of life as meaningful
as possible.
Whether practicing in the trauma Centre, intensive care unit or other acute care setting,
home care, hospice, long-term care, or the many locations where patients and their families
receive ambulatory services, nurses are closely involved with complex and emotionally laden
issues surrounding loss of life. To be most effective and satisfied with the care they provide, nurses
need to attend their own emotional responses to the losses they witness every day. Well before
the nurse exhibits symptoms of stress or burn out, he or she acknowledge the difficulty of coping
with others’ pain on a daily basis and put healthy practices in place that will guard against
emotional exhaustion. In hospice setting, where death grief and loss are expected outcomes of
patient care, interdisciplinary colleagues rely for each other for support, using meeting time to
express frustration, sadness, anger, and other emotions; to learn coping skills from each other;
and to speak about how they were affected by life of those patient who have died since the last
meeting. In many setting, staff members organized or attend memorial services to support families
and other caregivers, who fine comfort in joining each other to remember and celebrate the life
of patients. Finally, healthy personal habits, including diet, exercise, stress reduction activities
(such as dance, yoga, Tai chi, meditation), and sleep, will help to guard against the detrimental
effects of stress.
Reference: handbook for brunner and suddarth’s textbook of Canadian medical-surgical nursing
[https://books.google.com.ph]
Providing good care for dying patients requires that physicians be knowledgeable of ethical
issues pertinent to end of-life care. Effective advance care planning can assure patient autonomy
at the end of life even when the patient has lost decision-making capacity. Medical futility is
difficult to identify in the clinical setting but may be described as an intervention that will not allow
the intended goal of therapy to be achieved. Medical interventions, including artificial nutrition
and hydration, can be withheld or withdrawn if this measure is consistent with the dying patient’s
wishes. Physicians caring for terminally ill patients receive requests for physician-assisted suicide.
The physician should establish the basis for the request and work with the healthcare team to
provide support and comfort for the patient. Physician-assisted suicide could negate the
traditional patient-physician relationship and place vulnerable populations at risk. Physicians need
to incorporate spiritual issues into the management of patients at the end of life. The integrity of
the physician as a moral agent in the clinical setting needs to be recognized and honored. The
physician has a moral imperative to assure good care for dying patients.
Physicians and other healthcare professionals providing care for dying patients will
confront many ethical dilemmas and challenges. Providing good care to dying patients requires
physicians to be knowledgeable of potential ethical dilemmas and be aware of strategies and
interventions aimed at avoiding conflict. It is important for the physician to be proactive with
regard to decision making and have good communication skills. Keeping the patient central in all
decision making, that is, respecting patient autonomy, is essential to ethical care for dying
patients. Thus, the role of advance care planning is important in caring for patients at the end of
life. The physician needs to have a good understanding of ethical principles and issues such as
medical futility and the withdrawing and withholding of medical interventions as well as the legal
ramifications of these ethical issues. With the growing attention on physician-assisted suicide and
euthanasia, physicians need not only to be knowledgeable of the ethical, legal, and professional
ramifications of these issues, but also to have a clear understanding of their own beliefs on this
and other ethical issues at the end of life. Good care for dying patients also encompasses attention
to spiritual issues at the end of life. Therefore, physicians need to be comfortable with their role
regarding end-of-life care and spirituality. It is important that physicians have an understanding of
the ethical principles that underlie biomedical ethics and how they relate to providing care for
dying patients.1 Providing good care to dying patients is an ethical mandate inherent in the very
nature of the physician’s role. As indicated in the 18th Century by John Gregory, “It is as much the
business of a physician to alleviate pain as to smooth the avenues of death...as to cure disease.
An understanding of the principles that underlie biomedical ethics is important in addressing the
issues that confront physicians and their patients at the end of life. The ethical principles include
autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, justice, and fidelity. If one of the ethical principles could
be viewed as central to ethical decision making, autonomy would meet that description.
Autonomy calls for the patient to be the decision maker,that is, having the right to self-
determination. This principle calls for physicians to preserve a patient’s right to self-determination
even when the patient has lost decision-making capacity. This preservation can be achieved
through the appropriate use of advance directives. Because of the difficulty physicians and
patients have in discussing end-of-life issues, physicians frequently resort to caregivers to make
decisions in lieu of the patient. This action may be a violation of the principle of autonomy if the
patient still has decisional capacity and has not authorized a surrogate decision maker, or if the
patient no longer has decisional capacity and the decision maker was not designated by the patient
or is unaware of the patient’s wishes. The ethical principle of beneficence calls for the physician
to advocate for what is good or beneficial for the patient.
Frequently, patients’ choices regarding end-of-life decisions have not been expressed through
advance care planning and caregivers who are knowledgeable of the patient’s wishes may be
absent. In this case, the physician’s role for the dying patient must always be to advocate for
approaches that promote good care for the patient at the end of life. The physician needs to be
careful that patient autonomy must not be violated in an attempt to do what the physician views
is in the patient’s
best interest. The patient’s desire to choose an option should be respected even if the physician
views the option as not in the patient’s best interest. Thus, patient autonomy should prevail over
paternalism.1 The principle of nonmaleficence calls for the physician not to inflict harm
intentionally. This principle relates to a basic maxim in good medical care, Primum non
nocere(“above all, do no harm”. Many physicians view participation in physician-assisted-suicide
as a violation of this principle. This position is reflected in the Osteopathic Oath required of all
graduates of colleges of osteopathic medicine, which states “I will give no drug for deadly purposes
to any person though it may be asked of me.” The ethical principle of justice demands fairness in
the delivery of healthcare. It may apply on a societal level by assuring a just distribution of
healthcare resources, or it may apply to an individual patient by assuring fair treatment to that
patient at the end of life. In either case, physicians have an ethical obligation to advocate for fair
and appropriate treatment of patients at the end of life. The last ethical principle, fidelity, requires
the physician to be faithful and truthful to the dying patient. The physician should provide ongoing
information about the patient’s condition when appropriate. Also, the physician needs to be
Physicians should encourage dialogue about end-of life care and use of advance directives so that
autonomy can be preserved even if patient’s decision-making capacity is lost.
Physicians should do what they believe is in the patient’s best interest, but this action must not
conflict with the patient’s right to self-determination
Many physicians view participation in physician assisted suicide as a violation of this principle.
Physicians should advocate for treatment of their dying patients which is just and without
discrimination.
Physicians should be truthful to their dying patients regarding the diagnosis and prognosis and
advocate for their dying patients’ wishes even when those patients’ decision-making capacity has
been lost.
The management of patients at the end-of-life will involve several issues that can be challenging
ethical dilemmas. These may include issues such as withdrawing and withholding of interventions,
medical futility, and physician-assisted suicide.
Medical Futility
The issue of medical futility is a clinical situation in medical ethics that may pose challenges in
providing care at the end of life. Reference to an intervention as being medically futile is a common
description; however, clear definitions of medical futility are still lacking and few clinical scenarios
exist in which there may be uniform agreement that a specific intervention is medically futile. For
example, most would agree that providing cardiopulmonary resuscitation to a patient who is
determined to have brain death would be futile. In contrast, there would not be uniform
agreement that the provision of artificial nutrition and hydration to a patient in a persistent
vegetative state would be medically futile. Yet, either of these interventions may be considered
medically futile, depending on one’s definition of medical futility. Thus, unequivocal cases of
medical futility are not commonplace.
Physician-Assisted Suicide
Most physicians involved in end-of-life care have received requests for physician-assisted suicide.
Physician-assisted suicide involves the physician’s providing the means to end the patient’s life,
usually by prescribing a lethal dose of a sedative hypnotic. Patients may request physician-assisted
suicide because of intractable pain, depression, fear of being a burden on their family, or fear of
loss of their dignity. It is important that the physician identify the underlying cause of the patient’s
suffering. Depression should be assessed and managed, and other professionals such as
psychiatrists, psychologists, and the clergy should be engaged when appropriate. Patients should
be reassured that physical symptoms such as pain can be effectively managed. Spiritual symptoms
of guilt, loss of purpose in life, and abandonment often can be addressed by including the chaplain
as part of the healthcare team. The physician should address common fears that the patient may
exhibit which lead to the desire for physician-assisted suicide. It is important that the physician
work as part of a healthcare team in addressing the varied etiologies that lead to a patient’s
request for physician-assisted suicide. Through a team approach, nearly all the reasons for which
patients may request physician-assisted suicide can be addressed effectively. It is important for
the physician to provide support and a commitment to dying patients that they will not be
abandoned and their symptoms will be managed throughout the dying process. Physicians must
be cautious not to affirm the patient’s request for physician-assisted suicide as the request
frequently emanates from the patient’s feelings of self-worthlessness. Therefore, the patient
could interpret the physician’s affirmation as supporting that perception of self-worthlessness.
Traditionally, there has been reluctance on the part of physicians to use higher doses of narcotic
analgesics in terminally ill patients because of a fear of causing death due to central nervous
system depression. Some have viewed this administration of such medication as euthanasia. Data
have indicated that this effect has largely been overstated. Nevertheless, even if administration of
a narcotic analgesic may hasten the dying process in patients who are near death, as long as the
prime intention of administering the narcotic analgesic is for the purpose of pain management
and not the purposeful hastening of death, it is ethically acceptable to administer the analgesic. In
this case, the ethical principle of the double effect allows for the unintended, secondary
consequences—that is, the hastening of death—because of the good primary intention of the
principle intervention—that is, pain management. One assumes that the patient or proxy decision
maker is aware of the unintended consequences of aggressive pain management.
The physician’s role as a moral agent in medical ethics is frequently overlooked. Although few
argue about the centrality of patient autonomy as it relates to ethical decision making, one cannot
lose sight of the fact that the physician is an integral agent in moral acts that take place in
healthcare. Therefore, physicians should not be compelled to violate ethical convictions or
religious beliefs at the request of a patient or the patient’s caregiver. When a patient indicates
requests or desires for interventions that may violate the physician’s own conscience or ethical
standards, the physician should recognize and discuss these differences at the outset. When a
patient and physician are at odds regarding proceeding with care that the patient requests, the
patient should seek another healthcare provider and the physician should assist and support the
transition.
Physicians frequently hesitate to ask their patients questions about spiritual issues, yet spirituality
may become central to a patient near the end of life. Spirituality may span affirmation of specific
religious beliefs to simply making sense or identifying meaning in life. It has been recognized that
patients at the end of life could experience significant spiritual growth. The physician should
explore the patient’s past and current spiritual life, whether the patient would value a visit from a
clergy person, and the importance of religious rituals to the patient. Physicians should be aware
of how important religion may be to a specific patient, and physicians should facilitate available
resources to aid their patients in spiritual care.
-Owning feelings
Encourage client to connect their feelings in a compassionate way and to take
responsibility for those feeling and connection with their bodies.
-Taking responsibility
Encourage client to accept full responsibility for their feeling.
-Saying “won’t, not, can’t”
Another language technique encourage client to stop saying “can’t” and replace it
with “wont”
Enabling clients to behave differently
-Writing feeling down
We routinely recommend clients to keep a journal or diary to record thei feeling
and monitor which skills and techniques they find useful.
-Using “empty chair”
This is a valuable and flexible techniques people to say what they feel.it can help
client recognize and accept their feeling to deal with inappropriate feeling and to take
responsibility for these feeling.
1. Expressing an emotion
2. Dealing with inner conflict
3. Making difficult choices
-Sculpting and other psychodrama techniques
Congruence: this technique involves therapists being genuine and authentic, and ensuring that
their facial expressions and body language match their words.
Unconditional Positive Regard: unconditional positive regard (UPR) is practice by accepting,
respecting, and caring about one’s clients; the therapist should operate from the perspective
that clients are doing the best they can in their circumstances and with the skills and knowledge
available to them.
Empathy: it is vital for the therapist to show clients that s/he understands their emotions rather
than just feeling sympathy for them.
Non directiveness: a cornerstone of client-centered therapy, non-directiveness refers to the
method of allowing the client to drive the therapy session; therapists should refrain from giving
advice or planning activities for their sessions.
Reflection of Feelings: repeating what the client has shared about his or her feelings; this lets
the client know the therapist is listening actively and understanding what the client is saying,
as well as giving them an opportunity to further explore their feelings.
Open Questions: this technique refers to the quintessential “therapist” question – “How does
that make you feel?” Of course, that is not the only open question that can be used in client-
centered therapy, but it is a good open question that can encourage clients to share and be
vulnerable.
Paraphrasing: therapists can let clients know that they understand what the clients have told
them by repeating what they have said back to them in the therapist’s own words; this can also
help the client to clarify their feelings or the nature of their problems.
Encouragers: these words or phrases, like “uh-huh,” “go on,” and “what else?” are excellent at
encouraging the client to continue; these can be especially useful for a client who is shy,
introverted, or afraid of opening up and being vulnerable (J & S Garrett, 2013)
Genitalia, rectum
HOSPICE CARE
Many people consider hospice to be a place where people go to die. However, hospice (or
palliative care) is not a place, but a special type of care for terminally ill patients and their families.
Terminally ill means that the patient's illness can't be cured and he or she is going to die from the
illness. Therefore, hospice care is not meant to cure the patient, but to provide comfort for him or
her. Hospice caregivers often provide this type of care in the patient's home, but can also provide
it in a hospital or nursing home.
The goal of hospice care is to help terminally ill patients and their families cope with the end of
life. Hospice is made up of a team of caregivers who specialize in end-of-life care. This team usually
includes doctors, nurses, social workers, counselors, home health aides, and trained volunteers.
Usually a family member or close friend is the main caregiver, who helps the patient make
important decisions.
The hospice team tries to make the patient's death as peaceful and painless as possible. The team
may use medical treatments to help ease the patient's pain and discomfort.
The goal of palliative care is to provide treatment that eases the patient’s pain and other
symptoms, as opposed to trying to cure the disease causing the symptoms. Palliative care
specifically addresses quality of life issues and symptom management.
Communication plays a very large role in palliative care. Good communication between the
patient, family, caregivers, and hospice team or healthcare providers can provide comfort, relieve
stress, and ease the fears of everyone involved.
Addressing the patient's quality of life is the central focus of palliative care. This may mean
addressing psychological, spiritual, and social issues, as well as the physical symptoms the patient
may have. It is very important that the patient feel as comfortable as possible.
Dying at home
Many people choose to receive hospice care in the comfort of their home, which means that they
choose to die in their home. There are advantages and disadvantages of a home death, which
people need to consider when making their decision.
When diagnosed with a terminal illness, many people feel a loss of control. A home death allows
them to keep some sense of control over their lives. It also provides a more comfortable setting in
which to die. However, while dying at home may be the right choice for some patients, family
members and caregivers have to decide if they can provide the intense care needed. They
must also decide if they can cope with the care and how having their loved one die at home will
affect them.
When a patient chooses to die at home, it is important for his or her family members and
caregivers to learn what to expect. The hospice team will provide them with information and
support. This will help them cope with the issues and emotions involved in a home death. Family
members and caregivers need to be prepared for the symptoms and suffering that may occur
while the patient is dying. They also need to know how to manage the symptoms and whom they
should contact if the symptoms can't be controlled, in an emergency, or when death occurs. With
the right support and education, some families find that a home death can be a peaceful and
natural experience.
When a person is very close to dying, his or her family members may begin to feel grief. Grieving
is a natural response to loss. Bereavement (the state of sorrow over the loss of a loved one)
support is a very important part of hospice care, and it should begin before the death occurs.
The hospice team helps the family grieve by guiding the family as they say good-bye. Expressing
love and other emotions is very important when someone is near death. It can be helpful for family
members to share stories and look through photos with the patient. Sharing memories is a great
way to ease grief and recall the happy moments in the patient's life.
Family members should also try to settle any conflicts that may exist before the patient dies. Family
members should try to resolve any issues that they fought over. This helps to relieve any guilt or
regret they may feel after the patient is gone.
Grief is a process that takes time; the amount of time depends on the individual. The hospice team
will generally tend to the survivor(s) for up to one year, such as counseling, support groups, and
educational classes. Without the proper bereavement support, the survivor(s) are in danger of
developing a more severe grief response. The hospice team can check for signs of this behavior
(such as suicide attempts or drug abuse) and help guide the survivor(s) in a safer direction.
Humor plays an important role in healthcare even when patients are terminally ill
Humour can play an essential role in the most serious healthcare settings, even when patients are
receiving intensive or end of life care.
They concluded that humour played an essential role in promoting team relationships and adding
a human dimension to the care and support that staff provided to seriously ill patients and their
families.
The researchers found that staff used humour in a number of ways, including:
To cope with, and sometimes distance themselves, from difficult situations. As one
interviewee commented: "When you've had the most stressful day and you're ready to cry,
sometimes it's easier to bring out humour and take it in the other direction instead of
bawling on somebody's shoulder.
To connect with other healthcare professionals and provide mutual support. Shared
laughter energised and nurtured a sense of community. "If you have those fun moments
and that connectedness even the worst hell can happen" said one healthcare professional
who worked with terminally ill patients. "You sail through it as opposed to walking out
really wounded"
To reduce tension when things don't go as well as they could do. A doctor who admitted
he had been hasty suggesting that a terminally ill man give up his apartment so soon was
greeted with the quip: "Shall I chart that you made a confession or that you made a
mistake"
To express frustration at life-prolonging measures that staff disagreed with. Staff in the
intensive care unit told researchers how they paralleled what was happening to one
patient by using an inflatable dinosaur called Dino and putting him through the same
interventions. He became a symbol of their dissatisfaction with the situation.
To connect with patients and make them feel cared for as individuals. When a health care
aide took a joke picture of a patient with a bubble bath helmet on his head to put him at
ease it became one of his prized possessions. He showed it to everyone who visited as
evidence of the special treatment he was receiving. And when he died, it was displayed
alongside important family photos.
THE IMPORTANCE OF PALLIATIVE CARE FOR TERMINALLY ILL CANCER PATIENTS AND THEIR
FAMILY MEMBERS
The present paper focuses on close family members’ report of satisfaction with the care
that terminally ill cancer patients and their close family members receive at the end of the patients’
life. The situation today is that the death has moved out of the home and into the institution. It
seems that the more developed a country's health care system is, the fewer patients die at home.
Palliative care is active, holistic care and treatment for patients with incurable diseases and short
expected time left to live. Relieving physical pain and other bothersome symptoms are central
together with efforts against psychological, social, spiritual and existential problems. The aim of
palliative care is to improve both the patients’ and the close family members’ quality of life and
well-being.
Do health care personnel have the courage and take the time it needs to listen to the terminally ill
who often have thoughts and wishes in their last days to live? Talking about the death may create
safety and reduce anxiety for all the involved. Unpleasant symptoms occur frequently among
dying patients in hospitals the last days of their lives. In order to provide dignity for the terminally
ill’s last days and the death, improving relief of symptoms of physical, psychological, spiritual and
existential character is needed. It may be challenging for the health care personnel to open up for
talks with palliative patients about short expected time left to live and about the death. Dignity in
death is related to having someone together with them in the death moment. It is important that
the dying one receive good pain relief and support to cope with anxiety, worries, and physical
symptoms. To succeed in this, cooperation among the patients, close family members and health
personnel is provided.
Although dying patients may have different needs and wants, there are some assumptions that
characterize "good care” for the dying, such as relief from emotional and physical problems, social
support, continuity in care, and good communication both with the physicians and the nurses. To
evaluate palliative care, satisfaction with care is an often used method.
In the last decades several kinds of palliative care have been developed, such as home
care and hospice. So far few randomized trials comparing such program with traditional treatment
have been executed. Based on existing studies it is difficult to make any certain conclusions about
what kind of influences such interventions may have on the patients’ and the close family
members’ satisfaction with the palliative care they receive.
https://www.urmc.rochester.edu/encyclopedia/content.aspx?contenttypeid=34&contentid=235
05-1
https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2008-04/w-hpa040808.php