Going Back To The Dark Ages?: From The Stands Domini M. Torrevillas
Going Back To The Dark Ages?: From The Stands Domini M. Torrevillas
Going Back To The Dark Ages?: From The Stands Domini M. Torrevillas
16SHARES00
image: https://www.philstar.com/images/authors/1804859.jpg
FROM THE STANDS - Domini M. Torrevillas (The Philippine Star) - July 18, 2019
- 12:00am
During a recent interview with the press, former president, former Manila mayor, and now
citizen Joseph Estrada addressed the allegations of newly elected Manila Mayor Isko Moreno
about the way the ex-mayor supposedly drove the city into debt and bankruptcy.
Although I won’t weigh in on Estrada’s rebuttal, there is a particular portion of the interview
that I found quite interesting.
When GMA News reporter Susan Enriquez asked him whether he would be willing to run for
mayor again, he said that he would only do so if the Commission on Elections (Comelec) reverts
to a manual election.
I am the first to admit that I am not the most tech-savvy person. Nevertheless, I recognize and
appreciate the conveniences of technology, and in the case of elections, the security and
expediency it brings. Honestly, the only logical reason I could think of why anyone chooses to
go back to manual systems is if manual elections offered some other “conveniences” for the
electorate.
I’ve been through quite a number of elections in my lifetime, and I can attest that automated
elections have literally saved lives. I remember back in the day when manual elections were the
norm. Our brave teachers, nuns, priests, and other volunteers would guard ballots and face goons
at gunpoint. I’ve lost count of the many poll watchers I’ve interviewed over the years who have
had close calls with death – and this is not even counting the ones who did not survive their
encounters.
Now, with automated elections, such violence against poll watchers have become a thing of the
past – a relic of a dark and insidious age.
When news broke out over the past months about certain politicians advocating manual or
“hybrid” elections, I once again feared for the lives of these people. They will once again have
to defend ballots with their lives.
My fears were allayed when I spoke with my friends from the Department of Information and
Communications Technology (DICT) press corps about the recently concluded Automated
Election Systems (AES) Tech Fair at the DICT offices in Diliman. At the very least, the DICT is
working hard to find the best and most applicable solutions to the Philippines.
Our current technology provider Smartmatic was also present to showcase their latest tech. My
press corps friends were especially impressed with the touchscreen voting interface they
demonstrated.
Apparently, it was broached to the Comelec for use in the 2016 National Elections, but cost and
time constraints ultimately led to using paper ballots.
The other companies that presented also highlighted the use of blockchain technology, which
also has been reportedly used in Norway by Smartmatic. Looking forward, it is heartening to
know that there are many options available for Filipinos.
Despite the many choices, though, my friends still believe that what we currently have is the
best that our government can afford. Everything else – especially those that still rely on a human
element – is a downgrade.
As a political exercise, of course, it doesn’t matter who the provider is. It will always be
politicized. Whatever issues that our current provider is facing will be also the same ones hurled
at future providers.
Currently, we actually have one of the most secure and accurate electoral systems in Asia. There
is always room for improvement, but there is no room for going back to the dark ages.