Children VS Adults Second Language Learning

Learning is a process in which people study to acquire or obtain knowledge or skills.

Second language is another language after one’s native language. Second language learning

is a process of internalizing and making sense of a second language after one has an

established first language. Many think that second language learning is the same as second

language acquisition. In fact, it differs in some ways. Krashen1, a professor emeritus at the

University of Southern California, defines learning as a process between acquiring and

utterance. It can be said that language acquisition happens in subconscious system while

language learning happens in conscious system. Many think that second language learning is

the same as second language acquisition. In fact, it differs in some ways. Learning a second

language is different from learning first language. Learning first language has been started

since one is just a baby who does not have the ability to speak and only able to deliver

message by babbling, cooing and crying. However, second language is learned after one is

able to speak and has absorbed knowledge, which influences him/her in learning a second

language, both positively and negatively. Furthermore, there are some examples of learning

theories which are used in language learning over years; behaviorism, cognitivism, and

constructivism. Learning theory is applicable only if we recognize the differences between

children and adults in learning a second language.

Compared to children, adults have different ways to process a foreign language in

their brains. According to Tipping in his article, a research conducted by Dr. Paul Thompson

and other neuroscientists from UCLA, children use a part of their brains called “deep motor

area” to process language information. Deep motor area is a part of the brain which processes

the activity that is not thought about or happens without thinking consciously, such as reading
a sentence, blinking and breathing. It is like an automatic function of the child’s brain which

is used to acquire language, so it becomes a natura process for the child. Children acquire and

learn language intuitively, while adults think about it actively so it becomes “intellectual

process” for them. It is because when a person turns 18, the deep motor area narrowly shuts.

Hence, adults have to collect language information that they got in an area which is still

active. Thompson said neurological level of brain operates distinctively even though an adult

with comprehensive training feels he/she speaks instinctively.

The second difference is unlike children, adults are able to digest abstract or formal

thinking cognitively. Children have no merit or detention of formal operational thought in

learning language. Children’s cognitive abilities have not been developed while adults’ is

mature cognitively. Before we go further, we need to know what cognitive abilities are.

Cognitive abilities are skills based on brain to accomplish human activity from the simplest to

the most complex ones such as how to learn, pay attention, focus, problem-solve and

memorize. However, for children, these abilities are still under developed. That is why

children cannot develop their “formal operational thought”. “Formal operational thought” is

when people can think in abstract conditioning, combine and analyze things in a more

elaborate way. Children cannot draw a conclusion from an abstract thinking. In contrast,

adults have gained this ability which leads them to metalinguistic knowledge in which one is

aware of the use of language and realizes that sentence may have its literal and implied

meaning and analytic abilities which refers to the skills of picking up information,

visualizing, solving complex problems, analyzing and making decision as well as conclusion.

Because of this, they are aware of their utterances and compare it to their conscious

knowledge. For example, children will find it difficult to catch the implied meaning when

somebody says “it is very hot in here.” On the other hand, adults will find out the implied

meaning beyond its literal meaning and maybe respond it not by saying something but by
doing something like open the window or turn on the AC. It is because the sentence contains

abstract reasoning which put the meaning beyond the utterances that actually can be analyzed

by gestures, tone, and facial expression of the person saying and children do not have yet the

ability to think and analyze that way.

The last difference is adults are more conscious that they are learning than children

are. Children mostly learn without awareness of their proficiency and motivation. Even if

their proficiency of second language is limited, they do not feel nervous as much as adults do.

This is because adults have pride of not making mistakes. Thus adults pay more attention

when they speak in second language. It can be said that adults learn second language in an

analytic way. They tend to monitor their second language speech and avoid taking the risk of

making mistakes. Majority of adults often feel embarrassed by their lack of comprehension of

the second language they are learning. Different from adults, children learn second language

in a natural way. They absorb language information they got from teachers, parents and

people around them without thinking if it is true and beneficial for them. According to Brown

in his book Principles of Language Learning and Teaching, children are not aware of social

values and attitudes put on language. They produce utterances effortlessly compare to adults.

Self-consciousness of adults in second language learning affects them to filter and analyze

whether they use the correct grammar and vocabularies when they are talking and whether

the sentence they are saying has the right meaning and context. That may be the answer why

adults often correct themselves when they are talking, either correcting the grammar or the

words. They know they have to monitor and filter the utterances they produce to reduce

mistakes and to show that it is only a mistake, which means they know immediately that is

wrong and they can correct it after or by the time they speak and not an error where they do

not realize that the utterance they speak is wrong, so they cannot correct it until somebody

tells them it is wrong or until they eventually find it out wrong later.
 Despite having many different characteristics, children and adults have two things in

common in learning a second language.

The first similarity is imitating as a way which is used by both children and adults to

learn second language. Because adults have the experience in comprehensive learning, they

know how to imitate surface structure. Therefore, they are paying more attention to grammar

and surface features while children are paying more attention to the meaning of the utterance.

The most important is they can deliver the message to the person they are talking to without

paying too much attention to the grammar or proper vocabularies. In addition, children learn

by imitating people around them such parents and teachers. They will imitate the way those

people say something to deliver a message. For adults, they usually imitate native speakers by

watching movies or reading books. They imitate the idioms, accent and the pronunciation

said by the native speakers. By reading books, they imitate the structure of the sentence.

Both children and adults apply meaningful learning. Adults are able to relate their

experiences or existing knowledge to the second language they are learning about because

adults have cognitive framework. According to Weick, a professor at the Ross School of

Business at the University of Michigan, cognitive framework is a system where people make

interpretation of what information and experience they got into something reasonable. By

having this, they can transfer the knowledge of their first language to help them learning a

second language or relating the new learning materials to what they already know. Even

though it is said that children are rote learners by using aimless repetition and mimicking,

children actually practice contextual and purposeful activity by using imitation to learn. It is

not meaningless, it is not categorized to rote learning because by using imitating to learn a

second language, children acquire and store the items and information to an “established

conceptual hierarchy” in their minds. Afterwards, those are kept on their memory then it
forms a larger dan broader understanding comprehensively in cognitive structure called

”systematic forgetting” which the details can be recalled anytime.

To sum up, although adults and children are alike in the way of imitating and using

meaningful learning for second language learning, they have their own characteristics. In

order to be successful learners, both adults and children have to adopt the learning strategies

based on the characteristics they have. Therefore, adults have to realize that they have

different characteristics with children, so they cannot learn a second language in the same

way as children do. Not only the learners but also the teachers have to be aware of this. By

analyzing the differences between adults and children, teachers as the ones who give

guidance and instruction during the second language learning can apply the appropriate

methods.