International Journal of Applied Engineering Research ISSN 0973-4562 Volume 13, Number 10, 2018 (Special Issue)

© Research India Publications. http://www.ripublication.com

SHORT CIRCUIT ANALYSIS OF IEEE 14-BUS

SYSTEM USING ETAP
AKHILA CHILAKALA B NEELAKANTESHWAR RAO
Electrical and Electronics Engineering Electrical and Electronics Engineering
VNR VJIET VNR VJIET
Hyderabad Hyderabad
chilakalaakhila@gmail.com neelakanteshwarrao_b@vnrvjiet.in

Abstract—In this paper, short circuit analysis has been carried Asymmetrical faults are the single phase to ground (L-G),
out for IEEE 14-bus system using ETAP software. The double to phase to ground (L-L-G), phase to phase faults (L-L),
Maximum short circuit currents and the Minimum short circuit in which the single phase to ground fault occurs frequently.
currents, referring as Sub-Transient and Steady state fault
currents are used for determination of ratings of protective
devices. In IEEE 14-Bus system, the Maximum and Minimum
a
short circuit currents for Three-phase and Single line to ground Supply
faults applied at various buses are obtained in ETAP software. b
Side
Index Terms—ETAP software, Maximum short circuit c
current, Minimum Short circuit current

I. INTRODUCTION Fig. 3: Single phase to ground fault

A power system operating under balanced condition, which
when disrupted by a fault due to either flashover, insulation Short circuit studies are important for sizing in of
failure, physical damage or human error creates excessive high equipment and protection coordination of system. For an
currents to flow through the system that causes the system to efficient protection scheme of a power system, short circuit
operate in the abnormal state which is not desired. The short studies are to be performed, which are essential for Relay
circuit faults seen by the system can be classified as: Coordination studies. In this paper, a sample test case system
1. Symmetrical Faults and IEEE-14 bus system has been modeled and analyzed for
2. Asymmetrical Faults symmetrical three-phase fault and Single phase to ground fault
Symmetrical faults are those in which, (a) the three phases using ETAP software.
are short-circuited to each other (L-L-L), (b) the three phases
II. ETAP SOFTWARE
are grounded (L-L-L-G). In this, the three phases are equally
affected and so can be called as Balanced faults. Fortunately, The Electrical Transient Analyzer Program (ETAP) is a
these faults occur infrequently, that has the severity level much structured computer program that uses technically correct
higher than of all types. models, common data base. In addition, ETAP performs
3-phase fault numerical calculations with tremendous speed, automatically
a applies industry accepted standards, and provides easy to
Supply follow output reports. With the help of User-edited libraries,
Side b typical data can be substituted based on request [1].
Once the network is modeled, the software will calculates
c for 3 phase fault, single phase to ground fault, double phase to
Fig. 1: Balanced Three phase fault ground fault, phase to phase fault, voltage magnitude at the
faulted phase, and voltage magnitude at the healthy phase.
a Also, the minimum and maximum currents can be calculated in
which the minimum fault current is used for protection relay
Supply co-ordination and maximum fault current is used to determine
Side b
the breaking and making rating of the circuit breakers.
c The ETAP short-circuit program calculates different fault
currents corresponding to different time periods, specifically,
1/2 cycle, 1.5 to 4 cycle, 30 cycles. The 1/2 cycle studies
3-phase to ground fault
calculate momentary short-circuit current in their rms values at
Fig. 2: Balanced Three phase to ground fault
the ½ cycle at faulted buses, which are considered the

Page 97 of 101
International Journal of Applied Engineering Research ISSN 0973-4562 Volume 13, Number 10, 2018 (Special Issue)
© Research India Publications. http://www.ripublication.com

maximum short-circuit current values. The 1/2 cycle network is Three phase fault and L-G fault are created at Bus-1 and is
referred as the Sub-Transient network. The 1.5 to 4 cycle validated with hand calculation. The L-G fault currents are
studies calculate interrupting short circuit current 1.5 to 4 severe than the 3-phase fault currents at synchronous generator
cycles after the fault, and this network is referred as the terminal.
Transient network. The 30 cycle studies calculate the steady
state short circuit current after the fault.
III. ANALYSIS USING A TEST SYSTEM Maximum Short circuit current (1/2 Cycle) in kA when
fault created at Bus-1
Firstly, for a considered test bus system (Fig. 4), the fault
analysis has been performed. The assumed data for the test
system is shown in Table-1, Table-2. Fault Type Design Output Hand Calculation
3-Phase Fault 35.745 35.74
L-G Fault 43.987 43.97

Minimum Short circuit current (30 Cycle) in kA when fault

created at Bus-1

Fault Type Design Output Hand Calculation

3-Phase Fault 25.334 25.33
L-G Fault 37.655 37.65

Table–3: Three-phase & L-G fault currents when fault at

Bus-1

At Bus-5, 3-phase fault and L-G fault are created and the
maximum, minimum short circuit currents are validated with
Fig. 4: Single Line Diagram of Test System hand calculation and are tabulated below.

Generator Data
Bus P Q V∠° p.u. Bus Type Maximum Short circuit current (1/2 Cycle) in kA when
(MW) (Mvar) fault created at Bus-5
1 85 52.678 1.00∠0° Swing
2 50 30.987 1.00∠0° Voltage Controlled
Fault Type Design Output Hand Calculation
3 0 0 1.00∠0° -
4 0 0 1.00∠0° - 3-Phase Fault 3.517 3.517
5 0 0 1.00∠0° - L-G Fault 2.508 2.508
6 0 0 1.00∠0° Load Bus
Load Data
Minimum Short circuit current (30 Cycle) in kA when fault
Bus P (MW) Q (Mvar) created at Bus-5
6 80 0
Fault Type Design Output Hand Calculation
Table-1: Bus Data of Test System
3-Phase Fault 2.872 2.87
Bus to Bus R p.u. X p.u. Y p.u. L-G Fault 2.43 2.43
3-4 0.1 0.2 0
3-5 0.05 0.15 0 Table–4: Three-phase & L-G fault currents when fault at
4-5 0.15 0.1 0 Bus-5
5-6 0.1 0.2 0
Table-2: Line Data

Page 98 of 101
International Journal of Applied Engineering Research ISSN 0973-4562 Volume 13, Number 10, 2018 (Special Issue)
© Research India Publications. http://www.ripublication.com

IV. IEEE 14-BUS SYSTEM

The single line diagram of IEEE 14-Bus system is shown Load Data
in below Fig. 5. The parameters of dynamic model for the Bus P (MW) Q (Mvar)
synchronous generators considered in design are taken with 1 0.0 0.0
typical data values. The per unit sequence resistance and 2 21.7 12.7
reactance of machine are R2 = 2%, R0 = 1%, X2 = 18% and X0 3 94.2 19.0
= 7%. 4 47.8 -3.9
5 7.6 1.6
Xd’’ 19% Xq’’ 19% 6 11.2 7.5
Xd’ 28% Xq’ 65% 7 0.0 0.0
Xd 155% Xq 155% 8 0.0 0.0
Td0’’ 0.035 sec Tq0’’ 0.035 sec 9 29.5 16.6
Td0’ 6.5 sec Tq0’ 1.25 sec 10 9.0 5.8
11 3.5 1.8
Table-5: Dynamic Model Parameters 12 6.1 1.6
13 13.5 5.8
14 14.9 5.0

Table-6: Generator and Load Data of IEEE 14-Bus System

Bus to Bus R p.u. X p.u. Y p.u.

1-2 0.01938 0.05917 0.0528
1-5 0.05403 0.22304 0.0492
2-3 0.04699 0.19797 0.0438
2-4 0.05811 0.17632 0.0340
2-5 0.05695 0.17388 0.0346
3-4 0.06701 0.17103 0.0128
4-5 0.01335 0.04211 0.0
4-7 0.0 0.20912 0.0
4-9 0.0 0.55618 0.0
5-6 0.0 0.25202 0.0
Fig. 5 Single Line Diagram of IEEE 14-Bus System 6-11 0.09498 0.19890 0.0
6-12 0.12291 0.25581 0.0
The Generator data, Load data and Line data for the 6-13 0.06615 0.13027 0.0
considered IEEE 14-Bus system are shown in Table-5. 7-8 0.0 0.17615 0.0
7-9 0.0 0.11001 0.0
Generator Data 9-10 0.03181 0.08450 0.0
9-14 0.12711 0.27038 0.0
Bus P Q V∠° p.u Bus Type 10-11 0.08205 0.19207 0.0
(MW) (Mvar)
12-13 0.22092 0.19988 0.0
1 232.4 16.9 1.060 ∠0° Swing 13-14 0.17093 0.34802 0.0
2 40.0 42.4 1.045∠­4.98° Voltage Control
3 0.0 23.4 1.01∠­12.72° Voltage Control Table-7: Line Data of IEEE 14-Bus System
4 0.0 0.0 1.019∠­10.33° Load Bus
5 0.0 0.0 1.020∠­8.78° Load Bus
6 0.0 12.2 1.07∠­14.22° Voltage Control
7 0.0 0.0 1.062∠­13.37° Load Bus V. RESULTS
8 0.0 17.4 1.09∠­13.36° Voltage Control The design of IEEE 14-Bus in ETAP software is shown in
9 0.0 0.0 1.056∠­14.94° Load Bus below Fig. 6. The Maximum and Minimum short circuit
10 0.0 0.0 1.051∠­15.10° Load Bus currents of three-phase and single line to ground faults when
11 0.0 0.0 1.057∠­14.79° Load Bus occurred at Bus-3, Bus-6 and Bus-9 are simulated and
12 0.0 0.0 1.055∠­15.07° Load Bus tabulated in below Table-7, Table-8, Table-9, Table-10, Table-
13 0.0 0.0 1.05∠­15.16° Load Bus 11, Table-12.
14 0.0 0.0 1.036∠­16.04° Load Bus

Page 99 of 101
International Journal of Applied Engineering Research ISSN 0973-4562 Volume 13, Number 10, 2018 (Special Issue)
© Research India Publications. http://www.ripublication.com

Contribution 3-Phase Fault L-G Fault Contribution 3-Phase Fault L-G Fault
From To %V kA %V at From Bus From To %V kA %V at From Bus
Bus Bus From kA Bus Bus From kA
Va Vb Vc Va Vb Vc
ID ID ID ID
Bus3 Total 0.00 696.945 0.00 106.38 101.60 644.961 Bus9 Total 0.00 223.315 0.00 88.85 86.76 282.116
Bus2 Bus3 65.57 186.068 67.9 101.01 99.18 192.681 Bus7 Bus9 20.64 108.303 26.42 88.73 86.57 138.663
Bus4 Bus3 59.98 188.535 57.1 104.4 101.72 179.459 Bus10 Bus9 6.05 38.679 7.53 88.79 86.90 48.162
Gen3 Bus3 100 71.007 100 100.0 100.00 118.340 Bus14 Bus9 12.95 25.016 16.12 88.70 87.05 31.149
Load3 Bus3 100 255.750 100 100.0 100.00 156.955 Bus4 Bus9 50.57 52.497 74.31 94.89 70.89 65.899
Table-8: Maximum short circuit currents when 3-Phase & Table-13: Minimum short circuit currents when 3-Phase &
L-G Fault occurs at Bus-3 L-G Fault occurs at Bus-9

Contribution 3-Phase Fault L-G Fault

From To %V kA %V at From Bus
Bus Bus From kA
Va Vb Vc
ID ID
Bus3 Total 0.00 315.257 0.00 87.26 87.86 396.948
Bus2 Bus3 50.19 142.419 58.05 89.18 90.58 164.730
Bus4 Bus3 39.92 125.469 45.16 89.00 90.65 141.938
Gen3 Bus3 100 48.219 100 100 100 91.273
Table-9: Minimum short circuit currents when 3-Phase &
L-G Fault occurs at Bus-3

Contribution 3-Phase Fault L-G Fault

From To %V kA %V at From Bus
Bus Bus From kA
Va Vb Vc
ID ID
Bus6 Total 0.00 400.03 0.00 101.93 94.30 415.857
Bus11 Bus6 29.14 76.339 28.76 102.44 95.26 75.332
Bus12 Bus6 12.31 25.045 9.96 103.06 95.93 20.260
Bus13 Bus6 17.53 69.285 15.06 103.11 96.20 59.505
Bus5 Bus6 70.92 162.468 87.51 99.80 83.45 183.672
Gen6 Bus6 100 37.021 100 100.0 100.00 56.972
Load6 Bus6 100 35.873 100 100.0 100.00 24.760
Table-10: Maximum short circuit currents when 3-Phase &
L-G Fault occurs at Bus-6

Contribution 3-Phase Fault L-G Fault

From To %V kA %V at From Bus
Bus Bus From kA
Va Vb Vc
ID ID
Bus6 Total 0.00 215.440 0.00 87.69 86.38 276.058
Bus11 Bus6 15.74 41.229 18.93 88.04 87.04 49.592
Bus12 Bus6 2.68 5.448 3.22 87.77 86.47 6.553
Bus13 Bus6 5.39 21.285 6.48 87.81 86.61 25.603
Bus5 Bus6 54.07 123.866 75.47 95.00 72.83 150.661 Fig. 6 Design of IEEE 14-Bus System in ETAP Software
Gen6 Bus6 100 25.14 100 100.0 100.00 45.542
Table-11: Minimum short circuit currents when 3-Phase & CONCLUSION
L-G Fault occurs at Bus-6
For the test system considered, the maximum and minimum
Contribution 3-Phase Fault L-G Fault
short circuit currents are obtained when three-phase and single
From To %V kA %V at From Bus line to ground fault are created, and the values are validated
Bus Bus From
Va Vb Vc kA with hand calculation.
ID ID The same is implemented for IEEE 14-Bus system with
Bus9 Total 0.00 452.268 0.00 104.89 95.88 449.674
Bus7 Bus9 27.90 146.410 32.74 101.27 94.62 171.818
faults at Bus-3, Bus-6 and Bus-9. The maximum short circuit
Bus10 Bus9 13.70 87.577 12.95 105.01 96.43 82.783 current can be used to determine the breaking and making
Bus14 Bus9 32.34 62.489 29.70 105.48 97.77 57.390 rating of the circuit breakers. The value of minimum short
Bus4 Bus9 69.05 71.679 87.59 99.82 82.93 82.906 circuit current can be used for protection relay co-ordination
Load9 Bus9 100 90.087 100 100.0 100.00 59.540
scheme.
Table-12: Maximum short circuit currents when 3-Phase &
L-G Fault occurs at Bus-9

Page 100 of 101

International Journal of Applied Engineering Research ISSN 0973-4562 Volume 13, Number 10, 2018 (Special Issue)
© Research India Publications. http://www.ripublication.com

REFERENCES
[1] K. Brown, F. Shokoo, H. Abcede, G. Donner, Eason, [4] J. Prajapati, V. Patel and H. Patel, “Load flow, Short circuit and
“Interactive simulation of Power Systems: ETAP applications Stability Analysis using MATLAB,” 2014 International
and Techniques”, Conference Record of the 1990 IEEE Industry Conference on Green Computing Communication and Electrical
Applications Society Annual Meeting, 1990, vol. 2, pp. 1930– Engineering (ICGCCEE), Coimbatore, 2014, pp. 1-5.
1941. [5] Akhilesh Mathur, Vinay Pant, Biswarup Das, “Unsymmetrical
[2] Hadi Saadat, Power System Analysis, McGraw-Hill, 2006. short-circuit analysis for distribution system considering
loads”, Electrical Power and Energy Systems, 70(2015), pp 27-
[3] ETAP 14.0 Manual
28.

Page 101 of 101