Cold Case Investigation
Cold Case Investigation
Cold Case Investigation
INTRODUCTION:
The modern day investigator must be as diverse as the crimes that face him
or her. The investigator’s mind set is the key to success. The criminal investigator
must be creative to defeat all attempts at preventing the investigations from
continuing. He or she must be a problem solver and must be able to see beyond
their station. The investigator must face challenges as a game and must be
determined to win.
The investigator has the responsibility to investigate those crimes that are
brought to his attention by whatever means available. The normal investigation
has two (2) stages:
In each stage, the investigator must pay close attention to the facts and
make critical decisions that will affect the duration and impact of the case. The
investigator must always look for patterns and motivation for the crimes no matter
what stage he or she in.
a) Source of Information;
b) Interrogations and Interviews;
c) Observation; and
d) Background Investigation.
1) A “HOT CASE” – is one where the violation of law or regulation has just been
unearthed or discovered and the suspects and the witnesses to the case are
still emotionally affected, upset or involved.
2) A “COLD CASE” - is a dormant case where the witnesses and the suspects
have had the luxury of ample time to mull over the ramifications of the case
and to put up their respective alibi or defenses or otherwise form of
subjective impressions of the case. It is useful to bear this distinction in
mind so that in “HOT CASE”, an investigator should lose no time in taking
down the sworn statement.
When attempting to reopen the old cases whether because of a tip received or
through proactive methods, the following steps should be considered. Not every
step will be applicable in every case. However, each step should be carefully
considered before being abandoned.
1) Conduct a complete and thorough initial review of the case filed. Determine
if all reports are in the case file;
2) Once you have established that there is a statutory case, the very next step
should be to contact the evidence custodian and make sure the evidence can
be located. Go to the evidence custodian and personally view the evidence.
Make absolutely sure it is there before you go any further;
5) Reconstruction of the Crime. You must determine what, how, why and when
the crime happened by:
Team conferences.
Brainstorm Sessions.
Application of the six (6) cardinal points of investigation (5Ws and 1H).
6) Try to determine who has benefited that, financially, from the death of the
victim. This step can sometime surprise you and get you going in a totally
new direction;
8) Carefully review the medical examiner’s file and make sure it is complete.
Identify and locate the doctor who did the original autopsy examination.
Establish contact with the person who made the legal identification;
9) Contact the victim’s family and see if any help can be obtained from them.
Be especially careful at this point not to unjustly raise their hopes. Explain
what has brought about the new or continuing interest, and try to involve
them (unless of course they are the suspect);
10) Formulate an investigative plan and start to program your
investigative options;
11) Begin your interviews with peripheral witnesses and associates first.
Keep in mind that this may alert your suspect, so weigh this factor heavily.
Considerer the grapevine effect. These type of interviews will also give insight
in the changes in relationship and associations. Use the changes in
relationship to your advantage. The areas, both past and present should be
examined;
14) During this process, control and direction are essential. The use of an
investigative lead sheet is important here just as in handling a fresh case;
17) Remember that the ultimate goal is the successful prosecution of the
case in court; and
3) The BASIC ASSUMPTION is nobody has to talk to him if he does not want to.
Therefore, the person being interviewed will have to be persuaded always
within the purview of legal and ethical limits, to talk to said public safety
officers.
4) This make INTERVIEW as an art. You have your own style of interviewing a
person. However, you must consider the following:
1) Interview the victim, the accuser, or the discoverer of the crime before
interrogating the suspect;
3) Make no promise when asked “What will happen to me if I tell you the
truth”.
8) Ability to collect, mark, preserve, examine and then finally to confirm and
present physical evidence in court; and