Australian Dental Journal 2008; 53: 83–92

CLINICAL PROTOCOL
doi:10.1111/j.1834-7819.2007.00004.x

The Caries Management System: an evidence-based

preventive strategy for dental practitioners. Application
for adults
RW Evans,* A Pakdaman,! PJ Dennison,* ELC Howe*
*Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Sydney, Australia.
!Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Tehran, Iran.

ABSTRACT
In the absence of effective caries preventive methods, operative care became established as the means for caries control in
general practice. Water fluoridation resulted in a declining caries incidence which decreased further following the advent of
fluoridated toothpaste. The challenge today is to develop a non-invasive model of practice that will sustain a low level of
primary caries experience in the younger generation and reduce risk of caries experience in the older generations.
The Caries Management System is a ten step non-invasive strategy to arrest and remineralize early lesions. The governing
principle of this system is that caries management must include consideration of the patient at risk, the status of each lesion,
patient management, clinical management and monitoring. Both dental caries risk and treatment are managed according to
a set of protocols that are applied at various steps throughout patient consultation and treatment.
The anticipated outcome of implementing the Caries Management System in general dental practice is reduction in caries
incidence and increased patient satisfaction. Since the attainment and maintenance of oral health is determined mainly by
controlling both caries and periodontal disease, the implementation of the Caries Management System in general practice
will promote both outcomes.
Key words: Dental caries, risk, non-invasive management, fluoride, evidence-based care.
Abbreviations and acronyms: CPP-ACP = casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate; DEJ = dentino-enamel junction.
(Accepted for publication 19 June 2007.)

following the advent of fluoridated toothpaste. The

INTRODUCTION
dentate population now, in many countries including
The principles of modern operative dental care were Australia, is a mix of those who did not benefit from
established by GV Black one century ago, long before water fluoridation during their early years and as a
it became evident that dental caries could be arrested result have many restored teeth in need of lifelong
or prevented. In the absence of effective preventive maintenance, and those who did benefit and are either
strategies and with an increasing incidence of caries in clinically caries-free or have few restored teeth. In
industrialized countries, the operative model of care addition, there are in both groups, those who are more
became firmly established as the "ideal# means of dental at risk of caries than others. The challenge today in
practice. On the other hand, the concept of preventive relation to these caries risk groups is to develop a model
dentistry which was developed in the early 1970s has of practice that will: (a) sustain a low level of pri-
not been included in the dental psyche despite the mary caries experience in the younger generation; and
overwhelming evidence of its value.1 Operative care has (b) prevent primary and secondary caries experience in
remained the central management strategy for caries the older generations.
control in general practice.
Diagnosis and intervention
Need for new directions
In 1972, Rugg-Gunn reported little association between
The introduction of water fluoridation resulted in a the depth of a radiolucency and the clinical status of the
declining caries incidence which decreased further tooth surface (whether or not it was sound, had an
ª 2008 Australian Dental Association 83
RW Evans et al.

extensive white spot, or was cavitated).2 In this study of Both dental caries risk and dental caries treatment are
English children, about 50 per cent of the bitewing managed according to a set of protocols which refer
radiolucencies that extended to the dentino-enamel only to those interventions that are well supported by a
junction (DEJ), but not beyond, were associated with strong evidence base. The protocols are applied at
cavities, yet 50 per cent were not. A decade later in various steps throughout patient consultation and
Denmark, Bille and Thylstrup found among adolescents treatment, and have a twin focus on the primary
that cavities were associated with only around 20 per prevention of caries and its secondary prevention
cent of radiolucences that extended to the DEJ and only (arrest and reversal of early lesions) through non-
50 per cent of radiolucencies that were confined to the invasive measures. The system is not concerned directly
outer half of dentine.3 with the management of cavitated or symptomatic
Hence the dilemma; what sign at a particular point lesions other than recognizing their need for operative
in time indicates whether an approximal surface is care. Moreover, it is not concerned with the manage-
cavitated and in need of a restoration, or has a ment of patients suffering acute rampant caries due to
progressive lesion that cannot be arrested, or could be extreme salivary insufficiency.
arrested, or in fact, is already arrested? The Caries
Management System offers a structured evidence-based
The patient at risk of caries
strategy to address this problem.
The case history and clinical examination provides an
overview of unfavourable exposures to potential caries
THE CARIES MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
risk factors, namely: sucrose intake, fluoride use, dental
The Caries Management System is a ten step non- plaque, tooth morphology, and salivary characteristics.
invasive strategy to arrest and remineralize early lesions
(Table 1). This system was developed for use by general
Diet assessment
practitioners according to a new Caries Management
Policy that had been adopted by the Faculty of One of the main risk factors for caries is frequent
Dentistry, University of Sydney, where learning and exposure to refined dietary sugar. However, this risk
teaching within the new curriculum was designed to be appears to have diminished in the face of better plaque
informed by evidence-based practice.4 control and better fluoride exposure in recent times.5
The governing principle of the Caries Management As part of the dental history, a Usual 24-hour Diet
System is that caries management must include consid- Questionnaire is completed (Table 2). A thorough
eration of: (a) the patient at risk; (b) the status of each analysis of the frequency of consumption of between-
lesion; (c) patient management; (d) clinical manage- meal sugar-containing snacks and beverages will give
ment; and (e) monitoring. an insight into the burden of diet-related caries risk.

Table 2. Diet information obtained using the Usual

Table 1. Ten step summary of the Caries Management 24 hour Snacking Questionnaire
System
Content of the Usual 24 hour Snacking Questionnaire
Ten steps of the Caries Management System
Five questions are asked.
1 Diet assessment
2 Plaque assessment Do you usually have anything to eat or drink:
3 Bitewing radiographic survey
4 Diagnosis and caries risk assessment 1 as soon as you get up in the morning before breakfast?
5 Preparation of treatment plan 2 between breakfast and lunch?
6 Case presentation at which patient is informed about: 3 between lunch and dinner?
• Dental caries: 4 after dinner?
s Arrest
5 just before you go to bed or during the night?
s Reversal/natural repair (remineralisation)
In relation to yes answers, the type and frequency of each
s Prevention
sugar-containing food and beverage (shown on the lists below)
s Number and status of current lesions
that is consumed on that occasion is recorded. The number of
s Role of dental practitioner in caries management
spoons of sugar added to hot beverages is also recorded.
s Role of home care in caries prevention

s Current caries risk status

Biscuit Fruit juice
• Result of diet assessment and recommendations Cake Cordial
7 Oral hygiene coaching Pastry Fizzy drinks (coke, lemonade, etc)
8 Topical fluoride application (both professional and home care) Chocolates, lollies Tea
9 Monitoring of plaque control and treatment outcomes at Other sweet food Coffee
each visit Other hot drink
10 Recall program tailored to caries risk status

84 ª 2008 Australian Dental Association

 Caries management system for adults

seems little point in profiling these characteristics, at

Assessment of dental plaque control
great expense, when no meaningful action can be
Visible plaque indicates that the toothbrush, carrying taken to alter them.
the toothpaste, has not reached that part of the mouth
recently to disrupt the biofilm. For caries control,
The status of each lesion
the concentration of fluoride in the plaque fluid, at
susceptible sites, is all important. Final assessment of the patient at risk follows comple-
At the initial clinical examination and at every tion of the clinical examination bitewing radiographic
appointment thereafter, dental plaque distribution is survey.
recorded according to the Plaque Index on a special
form that allows for multiple dated entries which is part
Clinical examination
of the Caries Management System pack (Fig 1).6 The
scores represent both increasing plaque thickness which Smooth surfaces and fissures are dried and explored
is a surrogate for its age and its maturity. It is equally with sharp eyes and a blunt probe to reveal incipient
acceptable to record, instead, scores that relate to lesions and enamel breaks. These are recorded on
gingivitis or bleeding on gentle probing. Twelve sites standard dental charts. Unless frank cavitation is
are assessed: the buccal and lingual surfaces of the first evident, the diagnosis of dentine caries is via a
permanent molars (8 sites) and the buccal and lingual radiographic bitewing survey.
surfaces of the upper and lower right permanent
incisors (4 sites). The site on the buccal and lingual
Bitewing radiographic survey
surfaces of each tooth to be assessed is the area adjacent
to the gingival margin, extending from papilla to Radiolucencies are scored according to the five category
papilla. Individual surface scores are summed to give system proposed by Mejare (Table 3).9 These results are
the patient a score which has a maximum value of 36. entered on a form that also allows for multiple dated
entries so that radiographic changes can be followed
serially (Fig 2) (Dennison PJ, written communication,
Saliva assessment
April 2003). The purpose of this form is to aid
The quantity (mL/min) of stimulated whole saliva monitoring of non-invasive management of early non-
produced in two minutes by chewing paraffin wax is restored occlusal and approximal lesions. There is
measured. If the quantity collected during this time is provision for recording the radiographic status of
less than 1 mL, and the caries risk is assessed as high distal, occlusal and mesial surfaces of posterior teeth.
risk (see below), then further investigation of hypo- For each surface, there is a column of boxes numbered
salivation is required. Otherwise, extreme reduction 1 to 5 corresponding to a lesion score. Radiolucencies
in salivary flow is very rare, and other salivary associated with already restored occlusal and approx-
characteristics, though easily measured, are very imal surfaces (i.e., secondary caries) are not recorded on
poorly associated with caries incidence.7,8 There this form.

Criteria for Plaque Index (Silness & Loe, 1964)

3 = thick plaque is visible along gingival margin (no need to probe)
2 = plaque is visible along gingival margin, with or without air drying (no need to probe)
1 = following air drying, plaque is not visible but can be wiped off with an explorer
0 = following air drying, plaque is not visible nor cannot be wiped off with an explorer
0 1 2 3
Notes: 1 If an index tooth is missing, score the nearest tooth in that sextant. If there are no teeth in the sextant, enter X.
2 If plaque thickness varies along the gingival margin, score according to the worst situation.
3 The overall score is the sum of the 12 surface scores (maximum of 36).

16 11 26 16 11 26

Buccal Lingual

Date Score
46 41 36 46 41 36

Fig 1. Criteria and instructions for reporting the Plaque Index scores, and one panel of recording boxes for the scores. (Note: There are 13 panels of
boxes on an A4 sized form.)

ª 2008 Australian Dental Association 85

RW Evans et al.

Table 3. Criteria for scoring bitewing radiolucencies pragmatically. Risk of caries, according to the Caries
on occlusal and approximal surfaces (after Mejare, Management System, is determined at the first visit
1999) solely according to the clinical presentation of the
dentition (Table 4). At later follow-up appointments,
Criteria for Bitewing Radiolucency Scores
risk is determined according to the incidence rate of
C0 No radiolucency evident (not recorded) new lesions and progression status of existing lesions.
C1 Radiolucency is evident within the outer half of enamel
C2 Radiolucency extends to the inner half of enamel and
may reach the DEJ
C3 Radiolucency extends just beyond the DEJ Patient management
C4 Radiolucency is evident within the outer third of dentine
C5 Radiolucency extends to the inner two thirds of dentine The management of the patient at risk entails obtaining
and may reach the pulp cooperation to implement protocols that will deliver a
package of non-invasive measures designed to arrest
active non-cavitated lesions and, once arrested, to
Table 4. Criteria for assigning caries risk status maintain them in that condition.
Criteria for Caries Risk Status

Caries Risk New patient Recall patient Case presentation and treatment planning
Low 1. No clinical signs of caries 1. <1 new lesion per year The caries findings are presented to the patient in a case
2. May have bitewing 2. Or no progression of presentation and this is aided by reference to a Tooth
radiolucencies not greater existing radiolucencies
than C3 Decay information leaflet (Fig 3). The front side of this
Medium 1. No frank cavitation 1. 1 new lesion per year leaflet contains essential information regarding caries
2. May have sticky pits 2. And/or progression of (that the decay process involves demineralization and
or fissures existing radiolucencies
3. And/or bitewing remineralization, or natural repair, and that home care
radiolucencies not is the key to oral health) while other important
greater than C4 information is contained on the reverse side. The leaflet
High 1. Untreated frank cavities 1. >1 new lesion per year
2. And/or extensive white avoids dental terminology, instead utilizing words and
spot lesions phrases familiar to the Sydney population. This leaflet
3. And/or C5 bitewing serves as the principle patient educational material for
radiolucencies
dental caries and provides a basis for obtaining informed
consent from patients regarding the treatment plan.
On this leaflet, the number of tooth surfaces show-
Assessment of the patient#s caries risk status
ing bitewing radiolucencies of varying depth is entered
Following the clinical examination and bitewing sur- as appropriate. Alongside is an explanation of the
vey, the caries risk status of the patient is determined diagnosis and related treatment need. The prime

Key to Rating Caries 18 17 16 15 14 13 23 24 25 26 27 28

55 54 53 63 64 65
Outer 1/2 of Enamel 1 D O M D O M D O M D O M D O M D O M M O D M O D M O D M O D M O D M O D
1
2
Inner 1/2 of Enamel 2 3
4
5

Just into Dentine 3

1
2
Outer 1/3 of Dentine 4 3
4
5
Inner 2/3 of Dentine 5 D O M D O M D O M D O M D O M D O M M O D M O D M O D M O D M O D M O D

85 84 83 73 74 75
Date of radiograph: / / 48 47 46 45 44 43 33 34 35 36 37 38
Read by: (Print name) .......................................... Other findings:
Date of reading: / / e.g. bone loss,
unerupted teeth
resorption, cysts, etc.
Signature: .............................................................

Fig 2. One panel of boxes on the Bitewing radiographic assessment form for recording bitewing findings. In this example, tooth 16 has a grade 4
radiolucency on the mesial surface and a grade 3 radiolucency on the occlusal surface. (Note: There are 3 such panels on an A4 sized form.)
86 ª 2008 Australian Dental Association
 Caries management system for adults

Tooth Decay
Tooth decay, can be stopped, reversed, and prevented.

Hidden decay can be seen on your X-rays.

Holes in teeth need to be cleaned out and then filled by your

dental practitioner.
What can your dental practitioner do to stop decay?
give you the latest information on diet management and decay prevention
show you a tooth brushing method tailor-made for you
clean out and fill any teeth that have holes
seal any deep groves on your chewing surfaces
put concentrated fluoride on your teeth
see you for regular checks
What can you do at home to prevent and stop decay?
use fluoridated water for drinking and preparing food
eat and drink less sugary things between meals to stop the acid attack and aid the
process of natural repair
brush twice daily with a fluoride toothpaste – before bed and in the morning
take care to do a good job with your brushing
use fluoride gel, paste, or rinse if recommended
use an antibacterial gel or rinse if recommended

Your situation is shown on the chart below:

Number of
surfaces
X-ray shadow affected The most likely situation is Treatement need
Outer 1/2 The surface has minimal decay which is most
C1 likely non-active or arrested.
Normal home care.
of enamel

Inner 1/2 The surface has slightly more decay which

C2 of enamel may be non-active or arrested.
Normal home care.

Just into Decay on this surface is just under the enamel Special home care
C3 dentine layer, but is probably not a hidden cavity. depending on risk.

Outer 1/3 Decay extends under the enamel layer, and it Special home care and,
C4 may or may not be a hidden cavity. depending on risk, filling.
of dentine

Inner 2/3 This deep decay needs urgent attention. Filling plus special
C5 of dentine home care.

Your current risk of decay is Low Medium High

Your are strongly recommended to

attend your next appointment on
Fig 3. Tooth decay information leaflet (front side only).

responsibility of the dental practitioner is to ensure that diet-caries relationship, the probability that caries risk
patients understand the diagnosis and management will be reduced by reducing refined sugar is strong only
plan. in the case where there is close to complete absence of
sugar in the diet. But since sugar use is ubiquitous in
processed food, it cannot be avoided.5 Nevertheless,
Diet advice
dental practitioners accept responsibility for: (a) assess-
It is important that patients understand the diet-caries ing this dietary risk; (b) bringing this risk to the attention
relationship. However, because of the complexity of the of patients; and (c) providing appropriate advice.
ª 2008 Australian Dental Association 87
RW Evans et al.

Lip side of front teeth Behind front teeth

(upper & lower) (upper & lower)

Cheek side of upper teeth Biting surface of upper teeth Tongue side of upper teeth
(right & left) (right & left) (right & left)

Cheek side of lower teeth Biting surface of lower teeth Tongue side of lower teeth
(right & left) (right & left) (right & left)

Fig 4. The Where do I brush? leaflet (front side only).

Oral hygiene instruction and coaching Clinical management

The attainment of effective toothbrushing skills takes The risk-based caries management options are: pre-
time and effort. Oral hygiene instruction and coaching ventive, preservative (non-invasive) and operative
which has as its objective the reduction in the Plaque (invasive). Cavitated lesions are managed using opera-
Index score (or bleeding on probing). Patients are tive procedures. Sealants should be placed, without the
trained to recognize plaque and gingivitis and to removal of any tooth structure, over pre-cavitated
observe how quickly gingivitis will resolve following incipient or friable, fissure lesions.11 They will need to
the institution of regular and careful toothbrushing. For be checked regularly as sustained caries arrest depends
very high risk patients, the use of chlorhexidine is on sealant retention.12
indicated. Clinical experience shows that more than Most other lesions, discovered as a result of the
two intensive sessions is necessary for patients to reach bitewing survey, are managed with non-invasive
a level of proficiency and self-motivation that will methods (Table 5). The application of topical fluo-
sustain a lifelong commitment to a habit of twice daily rides for preventing, arresting and remineralizing
and careful toothbrushing. lesions follows protocols relating to professional and
The development of oral hygiene skills is facilitated home care use (Tables 6 and 7).13–15 Other than for
with reference to the Where do I brush? leaflet shown in lesions scored C4, management decisions about indi-
miniature in Fig 4.10 The main purposes of this leaflet vidual lesions are relatively uncomplicated. C5 lesions
are: (a) to illustrate toothbrush positions for oral are almost certainly associated with cavitation into
hygiene practice; (b) for reference at future visits to dentine and in need of urgent operative treatment if
demonstrate where plaque has not been removed; and pulp complications are to be avoided. Most C1, C2
(c) on the reverse side, to record the diet goals. This and C3 lesions are unlikely to exhibit enamel
leaflet complements the use of models during oral cavitation and, therefore, do not warrant operative
hygiene coaching. Note that the order of the boxes is: intervention, whereas C4 lesions may or may not be
left – front – right, i.e., the patient#s mirror image. so affected.
88 ª 2008 Australian Dental Association
 Caries management system for adults

Table 5. Protocol for the management of lesions when, following tooth separation, cavitation into
following caries diagnosis based on the bitewing dentine is confirmed.
radiographic survey
Lesion Management Protocol Benefits and safety of non-invasive management
Lesion score Treatment Provided that any cavities remain within enamel,
C1 Do not restore – apply topical fluoride and monitor the underlying dentine, although affected, remains
C2 Do not restore – apply topical fluoride and monitor uninfected and risk of rapid lesion progression is
C3 Do not restore – apply topical fluoride and monitor minimal. Radiographic analysis reveals that progres-
C4 Do not restore without further consideration
C5 Restore now – it is almost certain that the cavity has sion of lesions through enamel is usually very slow.
breached the DEJ For example, in Holland in 1966, at the height of the
Caries Risk Further consideration for surfaces scored C4 caries pandemic, it was estimated that the mean time
Low and • Restore only if the radiolucency extends
Medium fully 1/3 into dentine, or following tooth separation for lesion progression from enamel to dentine was
when cavitation is confirmed four years.16 In Australia today, where the use of
• Otherwise do not restore because it is most likely: fluoridated toothpaste is almost universal and where
s that the approximal surface is not cavitated, and

s that the lesion has arrested

most people have access to fluoridated water, caries
• Apply topical fluoride and monitor: experience in children and adolescents is substantially
s to arrest and remineralise active lesions, or
less than formerly.17 Accordingly, it may be assumed
s to maintain arrested lesions

High • Restore now that lesion progression rates have also declined.
• Apply topical fluoride and monitor: Hence, there is no urgency for operative intervention
s to arrest and remineralise lesions not yet showing
on discovery of lesions scored C4. The C4 lesions are
radiographically, and
s to prevent recurrent caries
potentially arrestable and time is on the side of success
in boosting the natural repair mechanism of reminer-
alization. For low and medium risk patients, it is
According to the Caries Management System proto- beneficial and safe to defer the restoration of most C4
col, C4 lesions are scheduled for operative care only surfaces, either indefinitely or until cavitation is
where patients are rated as high risk or, for medium and proved, because the negative consequences of acting
low risk patients, only when the lesion depth extends on false positive diagnoses are minimized. That is, if
through fully one-third of the dentine thickness, or arrested C4 lesions are not restored, then there are no

Table 6. Professional care topical fluoride protocol for adults aged 18 years and over
Topical Fluoride Protocol for Professional Care

Caries Risk Fluoride Varnish (Duraphat) Fluoride Gel

5% NaF (22,600 ppm) or GIC (Fuji 7) 1.23% NaF (12,300 ppm)

Low 1. Apply varnish or GIC to newly erupted wisdom teeth. At recall appointments to maintain lesion arrest.
2. Yearly applications on lesions until arrested
Medium 1. Apply varnish or GIC to newly erupted wisdom teeth. NOT APPLICABLE
2. Apply varnish to all lesions at each treatment session, then
3. 6-monthly varnish applications on lesions until patient becomes low risk.
High 1. Apply varnish or GIC to newly erupted wisdom teeth. NOT APPLICABLE
2. Apply varnish to all lesions at each treatment session, then
3. 3-monthly varnish applications on lesions until patient becomes medium risk.

Table 7. Home care topical fluoride protocol for adults aged 18 years and over
Topical Fluoride Protocol for Home Care

Caries Risk Toothbrushing with Fluoride rinse Chlorhexidine rinse

fluoride toothpaste (pea size) 0.05% (220 ppm) NaF (neutral) or gel 0.2% CHX
ONE MINUTE

Low Twice daily using 1000 ppm Not applicable Not applicable
Medium Twice daily using 1000 ppm Once daily at a separate Not applicable
time from toothbrushing
High Twice daily using 5000 ppm Not applicable Not applicable
Very high* Twice daily using 5000 ppm Not applicable Once daily before bed

*For example, patients with hyposalivation, or who have active lesions on anterior teeth, or who have active lesions on buccal surfaces of posterior
teeth.

ª 2008 Australian Dental Association 89

RW Evans et al.

harmful consequences for surfaces that are actually

Monitoring
sound although showing white-spot lesions without
cavitation. Patients are recalled for monitoring caries activity and
With referral to the Tooth Decay leaflet, the patient is oral hygiene competency according to a schedule based
informed of the potential problem, the probability of on caries risk (Table 8). Monitoring of caries activity
arrest, and the potential for arresting the lesion in this and patient health behaviour comprises the assessment
case. If, on follow-up, a C4 lesion has not progressed of: clinical status, dental bitewing radiolucency pro-
then it is reasonable to conclude that it has arrested, or gression, diet control, plaque control, fluoride exposure
had already been arrested, and that the surface is and, in extreme cases of hyposalivation, saliva control
probably sound. If, on the contrary, it turns out that the (but not described here).
C4 lesions are enamel cavities, they may progress
(without detriment in patients on regular recall) and
Caries activity
when, at a later regular checkup, the increased depth of
the radiolucencies reveals that the lesions have not The monitoring of lesions through the review of
arrested, they may then be restored. bitewing radiolucencies is the means to assessing caries
activity. At recall appointments, the radiolucency
status of new bitewings is compared with those of
Unreliable patients and clinical management
earlier series. Radiolucency regression or stability
An anticipation that unreliable patients would not indicates lesion arrest and the need to maintain
attend for remineralizing care and would, therefore, be preventive care. On the other hand, radiolucency
better off if their lesions were restored rather than progression and/or the appearance of new lesions,
leaving them to become the cause of dental emergen- either approximally or elsewhere, indicates caries
cies, is unfounded. Such patients are better served: activity. Accordingly, the patient risk determination is
(a) with information on their risk; and (b) with confirmed or amended and this, in turn, indicates
assistance on how to manage it. If they fail to act, which management protocols are to be followed.
dentists cannot shoulder responsibility for the conse- Consequently, some invasive intervention may be
quences, whereas dentists are responsible for the warranted, or the non-invasive measures may need to
negative consequences of investing in extensive restor- be applied with greater urgency.
ative care in hopeless situations where restorations are
bound to fail because of uncontrolled disease.
Diet control
The dentist#s main responsibility towards all patients
is to help them understand three facts: (a) that serious A review of diet history from time to time enables
dental disease is not inevitable; (b) that oral health is trends to be identified and discussed.
relatively simple to attain; and (c) that tooth repairs and
replacement parts do not come with lifetime guaran-
Plaque control
tees; they are subject to breakdown necessitating
lifelong maintenance including, from time to time, At each appointment, the plaque distribution and
replacement. overall Plaque Index score is recorded. Ongoing oral

Table 8. Recall protocol – schedule for monitoring caries activity and bitewing surveys
Recall Protocol

Caries risk Caries activity Bitewing survey

Low • 12 months following completion of treatment plan • at first visit

developed at first visit • then 12 months later
• then consider 18–24 month recalls • then every 18–24 months
Medium • 6 months following completion of treatment plan • at first visit
developed at first visit • then 6 monthly until patient becomes low risk
• then 6-monthly until patient is classified as low risk
High • 3 months following completion of treatment plan • at first visit
developed at first visit • then 6 monthly until patient is reclassified as low risk
• then 3-monthly until
s home care goals have been achieved for:

– oral hygiene
– fluoride therapy
s lesion progression has arrested/reversed and patient is

reclassified as medium/low risk

90 ª 2008 Australian Dental Association

 Caries management system for adults

hygiene coaching and encouragement is necessary. The of caries and detailed options for preventive strategies
active demonstration of recording plaque or bleeding were reviewed.23
on probing, and reviewing serial findings at each visit, With regard to the management of existing lesions,
motivates patients to improve and maintain a high and taking into account the new understanding of
standard of oral hygiene. caries dynamics, the concept of minimal intervention
dentistry was developed, as reviewed by Tyas et al.24
Minimal intervention aims to conserve sound tissue
Fluoride exposure
whereas previously the removal of sound dental tissue
More than any other factor, the management of an was not only encouraged but incorporated into resto-
appropriate fluoride exposure is the key to caries ration design (extension for prevention). The main
control. In the absence of a positive response to caries emphasis of minimal intervention is upon techniques
arrest, fluoride exposure is increased since it is the that minimize collateral damage to sound tissues
intervention that the patient is most likely to manage during operative intervention.25 However, it fails to
well. Both professional and home care schedules are address the question of how to keep sound teeth
adjusted, as necessary, according to patient risk. sound.
While there is a theoretical basis for recommending
that dietary sugar should be reduced, both in relation to
DISCUSSION
caries26 and other health problems, it should be clearly
In this millennium, Kidd and Fejerskov issued a understood that effective diet counselling protocols
challenge to dental schools to accept responsibility aimed at reducing dietary sugar are scant, possibly non-
for changing the attitude of dental practitioners to existent.5 Studies suggest that use of sugar substitutes
reflect that the more important and complex aspect of would be effective in controlling caries and would
care is to arrest lesion progression and prevent cavity require people to change their diet, but most people do
development.18 One of the main reasons for the not change their diet, even to save their lives.27
current attitude is the confusion that is created through But, whatever the diet-related risk, the plaque-related
the use of the term "dental caries# for three different caries risk increases substantially as plaque thickness
entities: (a) the multifactorial, lifestyle-associated bac- increases.28 Since thick plaque indicates accessible sites
terial disease that affects individuals within the phys- where the toothbrush (and toothpaste) has not been
ical and social context; (b) the actual lesion affecting applied, and since an abundance of strong evidence
the dental hard tissues of enamel, dentine and cemen- supports the role of toothbrushing with fluoridated
tum; and (c) the dynamic process of demineralization toothpaste in caries risk reduction, a heavy emphasis is
and remineralization which, on becoming grossly placed on this measure in the Caries Management
unbalanced, leads to bacterial invasion of the pulp System.
tissues. The literature refers to dental caries in all three We have not focused on the adjunctive use of
contexts with much of the focus being on lesion chewing gum for adults because gum-chewing is not a
management as if this was the disease rather than its mainstream part of adult culture and, like diet, is a
manifestation. behaviour where it is extremely difficult to introduce
The Caries Management System is concerned with change.
interventions that are known to be effective in arresting In cohort studies, it has been demonstrated that
lesions and reducing caries risk in the individual. It is implementation of intensive preventive strategies results
not concerned with the management of dental erosion, in substantial reduction in new lesions,29,30 and arrest
which is another issue, unless this is associated with and remineralization of existing lesions.30,31 In general
caries. Not included, at this stage, are promising new dental practice, similar results have also been
materials containing casein phosphopeptide-amor- reported.30,32 Such results imply that patients under-
phous calcium phosphate (CPP-ACP)19 which will be stand the benefits of a non-invasive approach and since
considered for inclusion once population clinical trails they do not enjoy having to endure operative care, are
report on its efficacy. motivated to maintain effective plaque control and
The challenge to reform dental caries management topical fluoride use.
has been taken up elsewhere. Anusavice20 published a The anticipated outcome of implementing the Caries
protocol on "how modern preservative dentistry can be Management System in general dental practice is
implemented# and new management principles, involv- reduction in caries incidence and increased patient
ing both preventive and operative strategies which satisfaction. Since the attainment and maintenance of
have since been described.21,22 In particular, the oral health is determined mainly by controlling both
principles and rationale for treating caries as a dental caries and periodontal disease, the implementa-
transmissible bacterial infectious disease were pro- tion of the Caries Management System in general
moted. The main focus was on the primary prevention practice will promote both outcomes.
ª 2008 Australian Dental Association 91
RW Evans et al.

REFERENCES operative treatment. In: Fejerskov O, Kidd EAM, eds. Dental

caries - The disease and its clinical management. Oxford:
1. Dunning JM. Preventive dentistry. In: Principles of dental public Blackwell Munksgaard, 2003:167–169.
health. 2nd edn. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 19. Reynolds EC, Cai F, Shen P, Walker GD. Retention in plaque and
1970:215–249. remineralization of enamel lesions by various forms of calcium
2. Rugg-Gunn AJ. Approximal carious lesions. A comparison of the in a mouthrinse or sugar free chewing gum. J Dent Res 2003;
radiological and clinical appearances. Br Dent J 1972;133:481– 82:206–212.
484. 20. Anusavice KJ. Protocol for conservative treatment decisions.
3. Bille J, Thylstrup A. Radiographic diagnosis and clinical tissue J Am Dent Assoc 1995;126:740–743.
changes in relation to treatment of approximal carious lesions. 21. Kidd EAM. Caries management. Dent Clin N Am 1999;43:743–
Caries Res 1982;16:1–6. 764.
4. Klineberg I, Massey W, Thomas M, Cockrell D. A new era of 22. Thompson VP, Kaim JM. Nonsurgical treatment of incipient and
dental education at the University of Sydney, Australia. Aust Dent hidden caries. Dent Clin N Amer 2005;49:905–921.
J 2002;47:194–201.
23. American Dental Association Council on Access Prevention and
5. van Loveren C, Duggal MS. The role of diet in caries prevention. Interprofessional Relations. Treating caries as an infectious
Int Dent J 2001;51:399–406. disease. J Am Dent Assoc 1995;126(Suppl):S2–S24.
6. Silness J, Loe H. Periodontal disease in pregnancy. II. Correlation 24. Tyas M, Anusavice KJ, Frenchen JE, Mount GJ. Minimal inter-
between oral hygiene and periodontal condition. Acta Odontol vention dentistry - a review. FDI Commission Project 1-97. Int
Scand 1964;22:121–135. Dent J 2000;50:1–12.
7. Billings RJ. Saliva flow and dental caries in aging adults. In: 25. Mount GJ, Hume WR. Preservation and restoration of tooth
Bowen WH, Tabak LA, eds. Cariology for the nineties. structure. Sandgate, Queensland: Knowledge Books and Soft-
Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press, 1993:235–260. ware, 2005.
8. Johnson NW. Risk markers for oral diseases. Volume 1: Dental 26. Burt BA, Satishchandra P. Sugar consumption and caries risk: a
caries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991. systematic review. J Dent Educ 2001;65:1017–1023.
9. Mejare I, Kallestal C, Stenlund H. Incidence and progression of 27. Perry KN, Rapoport L, Wardle J. Adherence to lipid lowering
approximal caries from 11 to 22 years of age: a prospective dietary advice. In: Myers L, Midence K, eds. Adherence
radiographic study. Caries Res 1999;33–100. to treatment in medical conditions. Amsterdam: Harwood
10. Pakdaman A. Implementation of the Caries Management System Academic Publishers, 1998.
in student clinics. PhD thesis. Sydney: The University of Sydney, 28. Kleemola-Kujula E, Rasanen L. Relationship of oral hygiene and
2006. sugar consumption to risk of caries in children. Community Dent
11. Mount GJ, Ngo H. Minimal intervention: early lesions. Quint Int Oral Epidemiol 1982;10:224–234.
2000;31:535–546. 29. Axelsson P, Lindhe J, Nystrom O. On the prevention of caries
12. Mertz-Fairhurst EJ, Curtis JW, Ergle JW, Rueggeberg FA, Adair and periodontal disease. Results of a 15-year longitudinal study in
SM. Ultraconservative and cariostatic sealed restorations: results adults. J Clin Periodontol 1991;18:182–189.
at year 10. J Am Dent Assoc 1998;129:55–66. 30. Johansen E, Papas A, Fong W, Olsen TO. Remineralization of
13. Australian Research Centre for Population Oral Health. The use carious lesions in elderly patients. Gerodontology 1987;3:47–
of fluorides in Australia: guidelines. Aust Dent J 2006;51:195– 50.
199. 31. DePaola PF. Caries in our aging population: What are we
14. Marinho VCC, Higgins JPT, Sheiham A, Logan S. The Cochrane learning? In: Bowen WH, Tabak LA, eds. Cariology for
Database of Systematic Reviews. Fluoride toothpastes for pre- the nineties. Rochester: Rochester University Press, 1993:25–
venting dental caries in children and adolescents. September 36.
2002. 32. Barnard PD, Gillings BRD, Gillings KJR. Assessment of a pre-
15. Marinho VCC, Higgins JPT, Logan S, Sheiham A. The Cochrane ventive dentistry programme in private practice. N Z Dent J
Database of Systematic Reviews. Fluoride varnishes for prevent- 1974;70:15–24.
ing dental caries in children and adolescents. May 2002.
16. Backer Dirks O. Posteruptive changes in dental enamel. J Dent
Res 1966;45:503–511. Address for correspondence:
17. Australian Health Ministers# Advisory Council. Oral health of Associate Professor Wendell Evans
Australians: National planning for oral health improvement. Population Oral Health
Final Report. Adelaide: South Australian Department of Human
Services, 2001:17–47. 1 Mons Road
18. Kidd EAM, Fejerskov O. Prevention of dental caries and the Westmead, New South Wales 2145
control of disease progression: concepts of preventive non- Email: w.evans@dentistry.usyd.edu.au

92 ª 2008 Australian Dental Association