Cartilage-Binding Antibodies Induce Pain Through Immune Complex - Mediated Activation of Neurons
Cartilage-Binding Antibodies Induce Pain Through Immune Complex - Mediated Activation of Neurons
Cartilage-Binding Antibodies Induce Pain Through Immune Complex - Mediated Activation of Neurons
20181657
Downloaded from jem.rupress.org on August 8, 2019
ARTICLE
Rheumatoid arthritis–associated joint pain is frequently observed independent of disease activity, suggesting unidentified
pain mechanisms. We demonstrate that antibodies binding to cartilage, specific for collagen type II (CII) or cartilage oligomeric
matrix protein (COMP), elicit mechanical hypersensitivity in mice, uncoupled from visual, histological and molecular
indications of inflammation. Cartilage antibody–induced pain-like behavior does not depend on complement activation or joint
inflammation, but instead on tissue antigen recognition and local immune complex (IC) formation. smFISH and IHC suggest that
neuronal Fcgr1 and Fcgr2b mRNA are transported to peripheral ends of primary afferents. CII-ICs directly activate cultured
WT but not FcRγ chain–deficient DRG neurons. In line with this observation, CII-IC does not induce mechanical
hypersensitivity in FcRγ chain–deficient mice. Furthermore, injection of CII antibodies does not generate pain-like behavior in
FcRγ chain–deficient mice or mice lacking activating FcγRs in neurons. In summary, this study defines functional coupling
between autoantibodies and pain transmission that may facilitate the development of new disease-relevant pain therapeutics.
Introduction
The molecular dialog between the immune system and no- RA-associated autoantibodies such as rheumatoid factor and
ciceptive neurons is a fundamental aspect of both acute and anti-citrullinated protein antibodies for several years before
chronic pain. In particular, the contribution of the adaptive clinical onset of the disease (Rantapää-Dahlqvist et al.,
immune system has recently come into focus. Reports show 2003), and antibodies present during early stages of arthritis
that autoantibodies against specific neuronal proteins in- can interact with joint cartilage and collagen type II (CII;
crease the excitability of nociceptors without involvement of Pereira et al., 1985; Haag et al., 2014). During the period
other inflammatory factors (Klein et al., 2012; Dawes et al., immediately before diagnosis, individuals frequently suffer
2018). For instance, autoantibodies against components of from joint pain, often without signs of joint inflammation (de
the voltage-gated potassium channel complex isolated from Hair et al., 2014). Furthermore, pain still persists in a sizable
patients with Morvan’s syndrome can directly elicit hyper- proportion of RA patients for whom other RA symptoms,
excitability in specific subsets of nociceptive neurons and including joint inflammation, are medically controlled
cause neuropathic pain (Klein et al., 2012; Dawes et al., (Taylor et al., 2010). Thus, joint pain uncoupled from ap-
2018). Similarly, autoantibodies have been suggested to parent disease activity is a pervasive problem and represents
cause pain in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Recent studies a fundamental gap in our mechanistic understanding of pain
demonstrate that individuals can be seropositive for in autoimmune disorders.
.............................................................................................................................................................................
1Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; 2Section for Medical Inflammation Research, Department of Medical Biochemistry
and Biophysics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; 3School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China; 4Department of Medical
Biochemistry and Biophysics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; 5Department of Medical Biochemistry and Microbiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden;
6Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; 7Centre for Cancer Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, University of
Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK; 8Alan Edwards Centre for Research on Pain, McGill University, Montréal, Quebec, Canada; 9Office of
Research on Women’s Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD; 10Division of Infection Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund,
Sweden; 11Department of Medical Science, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; 12Department of Unidad Academica Multidisciplinaria Reynosa Aztlan, Universidad
Autonoma de Tamaulipas, Reynosa, Tamaulipas, Mexico.
*A. Bersellini Farinotti, G. Wigerblad, and D. Nascimento contributed equally to this paper; **R. Holmdahl and C.I. Svensson contributed equally to this paper;
Correspondence to Camilla I. Svensson: camilla.svensson@ki.se; Rikard Holmdahl: rikard.holmdahl@ki.se.
© 2019 Bersellini Farinotti et al. This article is distributed under the terms of an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike–No Mirror Sites license for the first six months
after the publication date (see http://www.rupress.org/terms/). After six months it is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike
4.0 International license, as described at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/).
functional C5 and WT mice after injection of anti-CII mAbs et al., 2018). Using single-molecule fluorescence in situ hybrid-
(Fig. 3, D–F). As previously shown, the CIIF4 antibody binds to ization (smFISH), we detected mRNA molecules for Fcgr1, Fcgr2b,
CII but does not lead to cartilage damage (Burkhardt et al., 2002; and Fcgr3 in both neuronal (colocalizing with NeuN) and non-
Nandakumar et al., 2008; Croxford et al., 2010). Injection of neuronal cells, but failed to detect Fcgr4 (Fig. 4 D). Quantification
CIIF4 antibody also induced robust mechanical hypersensitivity of single mRNA molecules for each receptor in individual sen-
comparable to the other anti-CII mAbs tested (Fig. 3 G). These sory neurons plotted by area of neuronal soma showed the
experiments indicate that the mechanism responsible for anti- highest expression of Fcgr1 in neurons (Figs. 4 D and S1). Using
CII antibody–mediated nociception is independent of C5 (and Western blotting for protein analysis, Fcγ receptor (FcγR) I was
thereby terminal/lytic complement) or changes in cartilage detected in DRG and spleen (positive control) homogenates from
structure. WT but not from FcRγ-chain−/− mice, which lack cell surface
expression and signaling of all activating FcγRs (I, III, and IV;
FcγRs are present in mouse sensory neurons Fig. 4 E; Takai et al., 1994; Nimmerjahn et al., 2005). As FcγRIIb
As an alternative pronociceptive mechanism, we explored in- and FcγRIII antibodies did not work for Western blotting, we
teractions between CII immune complexes (CII-ICs) and neu- examined their presence in full DRGs lysates with high-
rons. We examined expression of FcγRs in mouse sensory performance nano–liquid chromatography/tandem mass spec-
neurons using several different techniques. First, we observed trometry (nanoLC-MS/MS) proteomics, revealing the presence
the mRNA expression of all four Fcgrs (Fcgr1, Fcgr2b, Fcgr3, and of FcγRIIb based on the identification of two unique peptides
Fcgr4) in mouse dorsal root ganglion (DRG) via gene expression originating from FcγRIIb (Fig. 4 F), along with two peptides that
microarrays (Fig. 4 A), which were subsequently confirmed by are shared between FcγRIIb and FcγRIII (data not shown).
quantitative real-time PCR (Fig. 4 B). These data are in line with Cellular localization was examined via immunohistochemis-
the publicly available resource DRG XTome database (Ted Price try (IHC). FcγRI immunoreactivity was detected in DRGs of WT
laboratory, University of Texas at Dallas, Dallas, TX), which BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice (Figs. 5 A and S2), colocalizing with
shows the presence of Fcgr mRNA in mouse DRGs (Fig. 4 C; Ray Iba1-positive resident macrophages (Fig. 5 B), but not satellite
cells or neurons (lack of colocalization with vimentin and tro- anti-FcγRI antibodies from several vendors (Figs. S2 and S3) and
pomyosin receptor kinase A [TrkA], respectively; Fig. S2). As using DRG sections from FcRγ-chain−/− mice as a negative con-
FcγRI is expressed in the soma of rat DRG neurons (Qu et al., trol. Three of four antibodies tested on DRG sections labeled
2011, 2012; Jiang et al., 2017), we verified our finding by using resident macrophages in WT mice with no detectible signal in
indicate that the binding of Fab to CII alone is not capable of compared with nonhematopoietic cells (including neurons).
activating nociceptors and that glycosylation of Fc is required. Mice were irradiated to deplete hematopoietic cells and then
transplanted with bone marrow (BM) from either WT or FcRγ-
FcγRs on neurons and not hematopoietic cells are responsible chain−/− mice. Irradiated WT mice that received WT BM were
for anti-CII antibody–induced pain-like behavior used as a control. Three groups of mice (WT-KO, KO-WT, and
We used chimeric mice to investigate the contribution of WT-WT) were injected with either saline or anti-CII mAbs and
FcγRI to anti-CII antibody–induced pain in hematopoietic cells monitored for mechanical thresholds for 6 d. Mice expressing
activating FcγRs solely on hematopoietic cells and not neurons examined protein expression of activating FcγRs in human DRGs
or other nonhematopoietic cells (WT-KO) were protected from (n = 4) and found that FcγRI expression did not colocalize with
anti-CII antibody–induced mechanical hypersensitivity, while the neuronal marker NeuN but was present in cells with a
mice lacking FcγRs on myeloid cells (KO-WT) developed me- macrophage-like morphology (Fig. 9, B and C). Using antibodies
chanical hypersensitivity indistinguishable from control mice against FcγRIIa, FcγRIIIb, and FcγRIIIa/b, we were able to detect
(WT-WT; Fig. 8, H–J). While these results do not exclusively test a positive signal only from FcγRIIIa/b, which colocalized with
the role of activating FcγRs on neurons, they indeed support NeuN-positive neurons as well as nonneuronal macrophage-like
such a link, as FcγRs on immune cells are not critical for in- cells in the human DRGs (Fig. 9, D and E).
duction of anti-CII mAb–mediated pain-like behavior.
molecular signs of inflammation, independently of complement between inflammatory processes and nociception during the
factor C5 and changes in cartilage integrity. By using modified first 5 d after antibody injection in the joints. Even though ac-
anti-CII antibodies and transgenic or chimeric mice, we estab- tivation of inflammatory cells is often indicated as necessary for
lished that, in addition to epitope recognition, interaction with induction of RA pathogenesis, arthritogenic antibodies can di-
neuronal FcγRI is critical for the pronociceptive properties of rectly cause cartilage destabilization both in vitro and in vivo,
anti-CII antibodies. Finally, the presence of FcγRIII in human preceding the onset of arthritis, independently of inflammation
DRG neurons suggests the translation potential of this work. (Nandakumar et al., 2008). We asked if associated actions could
While further studies are warranted, our findings support a role also drive pronociceptive processes. To test this, we used CIIF4,
for neuronal FcγRs in autoimmune pain conditions. an antibody that, unlike the other anti-CII mAbs used in this
CII antibodies readily bind joint cartilage in vivo, forming study, binds CII but lacks arthritogenicity. In fact, this antibody
ICs, which are likely crucial for the attraction of inflammatory is protective when given together with other anti-CII antibodies
cells and represent a key step in arthritis development. Thus, we both in vitro and in vivo (Nandakumar et al., 2008; Croxford
initially hypothesized that the early pain-like behavior following et al., 2010). Remarkably, CIIF4 induced pronounced mechanical
injection of anti-CII antibodies is mediated by local soluble CII- hypersensitivity. Thus, the processes associated with anti-CII
IC, inducing a low-grade, local inflammation, not detectable as antibody–induced cartilage loss unlikely mediate pain-like be-
swelling. However, we did not find any indications of coupling havior induced by the antibodies. Together, these experiments
led us to conclude that neither inflammation, terminal/lytic turned our attention to direct actions of anti-CII antibodies on
complement, nor cartilage breakdown are mechanistic ex- peripheral neurons.
planations for the pain-like behavior observed in the early phase To examine if anti-CII antibodies have a direct action on
of CAIA. Prompted to explore alternative mechanisms, we nociceptors, we added the antibodies in monomeric form to DRG
imaging protocol) at a constant flow rate (1–1.5 ml/min). CII-IC lysis buffer. 5–10 µg of protein per well was loaded, separated by
(1 µg/ml) and control IgG2b (1 µg/ml) were applied for 1 min, gel electrophoresis (4–12% Bis-Tris gel; Invitrogen), and trans-
and capsaicin (0.5 µM) was applied at the end of each recording ferred to nitrocellulose membranes. Nonspecific binding sites
for 10 s as a control (4-min wash period between applications). were blocked with 5% nonfat milk, and the membranes were
Cells were accepted as having a resting membrane potential more probed with primary antibody overnight at 4°C (FcγRI, 0.1 µg/ml,
negative than −40 mV and considered positive if the measured 50086-R001; Sino Biological). After washing, the membranes
current was ≥20 pA and higher than three standard deviations. All were probed with secondary antibodies conjugated to HRP
reagents were prepared from stock solutions, dissolved in modi- (Dako Antibodies), and the chemiluminescence signal (Super-
fied Hepes buffer, and applied via an 8-channel ValveLink 8.2 Signal West Pico PLUS, 34580; Thermo Fisher Scientific) was
Controller application system (AutoMate Scientific). detected by exposure to x-ray film (Fujifilm). Membranes were
then stripped (Re-Blot plus; Millipore) and reprobed with pri-
Western blot mary antibody against β-actin (3700; Cell Signaling Technol-
For Western blot analysis, spleen and lumbar DRGs were har- ogy) as a housekeeping protein reference. Quantification was
vested, snap frozen, and stored at −80°C until homogenized in performed using ImageJ.
Figure S1. Quantification from smFISH of mRNA molecules of Fcgr1, Fcgr2b, and Fcgr3 in mouse DRG. Related to Fig. 4. Scale bar represents 100 µm.
Fcgr1–3 molecules are plotted per individual cell according to neuronal area and showed as intensity of color gradient. Fcgr1 is shown expressed at the
highest level.