Is There A Scientific Explanation For Ufos?

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 2

Inglés - Francés – Alemán – Portugués - Italiano - Español - Traducciones

Is there a scientific explanation for UFOs?

People have long reported sightings of UFOs, which, by their very definition, are
unidentified flying objects. They are also quite often untestable and unexplainable
by scientific method, which is humanity's best tool for separating reality from
fantasy. It all hinges on something called the null hypothesis, which means the
burden of proof is on anyone making a positive claim. So whether you're claiming
that ghosts, aliens or a new breed of lemur exists, it's up to you to drag hard,
testable evidence into the unforgiving light of rigorous scientific testing and
evaluation. It's up to "ufologists" to prove that the UFOs they're seeing are real. So
far, despite countless sightings around the world, no one has come forth with
evidence beyond fallible eyewitness accounts, imperfect footage and conspiracy
theories regarding government cover-ups.

The sky is full of interesting phenomena, such as shooting stars, twinkling planets,
the aurora borealis and more, many of which are still under investigation as to the
exact science behind how they work. Could there be some natural phenomenon
in our atmosphere that people mistake for UFOs? If so, then there likely is a
scientific explanation, but it's probably weather or astrology related, which might
be disappointing to those who want to believe in UFOs.

As further proof that most UFO sightings have a scientific explanation, you could
look at the Project Blue Book study performed by the U.S. Air Force between 1948
and 1969. They investigated around 12,000 UFO sightings, and discovered that
11,917 were actually things like satellites, weather balloons, natural phenomena or
hoaxes [source: United States Department of Defense]. While the government shut
down the project in 1969, private organizations continue to study UFO sightings.

Comments

1) Evidence-- Since anecdotes never become evidence, even in vast numbers,


there is none.

2) Contact-- none known and proven to have occurred. The White House lawn is
not that hard to find, so if there are aliens attempting contact, they are
completely incompetent.

3) Abduction-- Also, none. To date, no one claiming abduction has sworn out a
warrant for these person or persons unknown. Coincidentally, lying to the FBI is a
good way to get sent to the pokey. One might logically conclude the "witnesses"
know they are lying.
Inglés - Francés – Alemán – Portugués - Italiano - Español - Traducciones

Discussion questions

 Does this article support or question the existence of UFOs?

 What do “ufologists” have to do to make scientists believe that UFOs exist?

 What kind of evidence have they provided up until now?

 What other things could explain people’s supposed UFO sightings?

 What did the “Project Blue Book study” discover?

 What does Comment 1 say there is more of than evidence?

 What does Comment 2 accuse aliens of being?

 Why have abductions not been proven?

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy