Lamb Waves
Lamb Waves
Lamb Waves
laminates
Cite as: Journal of Applied Physics 58, 4531 (1985); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.336268
Submitted: 09 May 1985 . Accepted: 03 September 1985 . Published Online: 04 June 1998
Leaky Lamb waves in an anisotropic plate. II: Nondestructive evaluation of matrix cracks in
fiber-reinforced composites
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 89, 1590 (1991); https://
doi.org/10.1121/1.401017
4531 J. Appl. Phys. 58 (12), 15 December 1985 0021-8979/85/244531-08$02.40 © 1985 American Institute of PhysiCS 4531
0000
(0)
0000
00000
(b) Matenal2
----~------~------
4532 J. Appl. Phys., Vol. 58, No. 12,15 December 1985 D. E. Chimenti and A. H. Nayfeh 4532
Together with Eqs. (5)-(7) we now have a two-dimensional
description of the elastic behavior of the "compound" bi-
layered structure.
a= 1,2, (4)
where no = ha /(h I + h z ) are volume fractions of materials 1
and 2. The momentum interaction term is P and S is a consti-
tutive-equation interaction term, to be derived from the re- B. Fibrous model
maining boundary conditions. The analysis so far parallels Building on the above calculation we now construct the
that of our earlier work.6-9 effective elastic properties for a fibrous composite, consider-
Since we consider only long-wavelength excitations, the ing the "compound" layer 1 stacked in series with the matrix
instantaneous displacements change very little on the scale material of layer 2 normal to the z axis. Following the devel-
of the cell dimension. Therefore, we invoke the approxima- opment that led to Eqs. (6) and (7), we define new elastic
tion ur---+U2 = u and wI---+W Z = W as h----..G. Summing Eq. (3) constants appropriate to mixtures in parallel and series of
written for the two media, we have the properties of compound layer 1 and matrix layer 2. These
ao-x ao-xz __
relations take the form
---;;;- + a;- = Pc u, (5) (10)
where o-x, o-xz' and Pc are weighted sums of the respective for a series combination of E and P, or for E and # in parallel
quantities for materials I and 2, e.g., Pc = n l PI + n l Pz' ( )*=[nj( )c+nt/( h]-I, (11)
Note that the term P has been eliminated, a consequence of whereas
the assumption of a frequency-independent wave speed. By
the procedure outlined in our previous work6-9 we derive the ,1.* = (Ac njEc + ,1.2 nt/E2HnjEc + nt/E2)-I. (12)
following expression for the constitutive-equation interac- Here nc is the volume fraction of the compound layer in Fig.
tion term lIb), and nt is that of the matrix layer. Now a new set offield
S =~
G
[A I (auaxI + Owl
az
) _ Az (au 2 + Owz )].
ax az
(6)
equations can be constructed which are formally identical to
Eq. (1), but where instead ofEq. (2) we have
Substituting from Eq. (6) into Eq. (4) with a = 1 and a = 2 au 1 * aw
leads to a -E
- -+/1.-
x ax az'
(7a) az
-E*
-
aw ,1.* au
a;+ ax' (13)
where
a xx au+aW)
=/1* (- - .
Ec = n 1(A I + 2,utl + n 2{A z + 2,u2) - (AI - A1f/G,
,.. az ax
Ac = n 1 Al + n 2 A. z - (AI - A.1f/G, Consider the fibrous composite modeled above to be in
the form of a plate of thickness d and immersed in an infinite
with
fluid medium. The upper and lower surfaces of the plate are
G = (AI + 2,u I)ln I + (,1.2 + 2,u2)1n 2. situated at z = 0 and z = d, and an incident harmonic sound
:For shear waves we have wave propagating in the x-z plane insonifies the plate. The
incident wave vector kf makes an angle 8 with thez axis, and
(7b) all particle motion is assumed to be confined to the x-z plane.
The calculation of the plane-wave reflection coefficient from
where ,uc = n 1 ,u I + n 2#1' Propagation along the z axis is a fluid-loaded, transversely isotropic plate proceeds in a
found by permuting x and z. This procedure gives straightforward manner. Substitution of the constitutive re-
lations of Eq. (13) into the field equations yields coupled,
(8) second-order partial differential equations for the displace-
ments. Making the usual ansatz for the formal solutions
(9) leads to a system of linear simultaneous equations for the
displacement amplitudes. These equations are
4533 J. Appl. Phys .. Vol. 58, No. 12, 15 December 1985 D. E. Chimenti and A. H. Nay1eh 4533
5.7 4.0
TRANSMITTER RECEIVER
5.0 -~ .~
4.3
36
2.9
FLUID
2.20~----:0:-'.2::-5----:0-:-5-:-0---""'0.-=-75:----~I.rro N LW
VOL FRACTiON
FIG. 5. Experimental geOmetry of Lamb-wave measurements in fibrous
FIG. 3. Principal wave speeds in unidirectional glass-epoxy composite as a composite plates. Transmitter is fixed with respect to sample, while receiver
function of fiber volume fraction, where Co and c~ are longitudinal speeds scans parallel to interface. Dashed lines show specular reflection. When
parallel and perpendicular to the fiber axis, and c2 is the common transverse Lamb wave is present, shaded region contains most of reflected energy. Null
speed. Particle motion is assumed to be confined to the :xz plane. zone is denoted by N, and leaky wave reflected field by L W. A similar radi-
ation pattern, not shown, exists below the plate.
where
are normalized wave speeds. The principal wave speeds cal-
~ = U *- E * aj Dj' ~i = iDj - aj'
culated for a sound wave whose particle motion is confined
Rj = exp( - a j td), j= 1,2, to the xz plane are collected in Fig. 3, as a function of the
(15) fiber volume fraction. Here, Co and c~ are the longitudinal
Pf = iiLf(a} - 1), af = (1 - k Jlt2)112, wave speeds parallel and perpendicular to the fiber axis, re-
spectively, while Cz is the common transverse wave speed.
kf = OJ/cf' c} = iLf/Pf'
This completes our analysis of ultrasonic reflection from a
Here, i = r-T, and the subscript/refers to the fluid. The fibrous composite plate.
circular frequency is OJ, t is the wavenumber of a propagat- As an illustration of this calculation Fig. 4 shows the
ing Lamb wave in the plate, and the Aj in Eq. (14) are dis- magnitude and phase of the plane-wave reflection coefficient
placement amplitUdes. Further required expressions are from a composite plate immersed in a fluid, where the mate-
aj = - [rl + (- l)i(y. - 4r2)1/2] t, rial parameters are appropriate to glass epoxy and water
with an incident angle of 20°. The sharp minima in the mag-
aj = [(k ~ - t 2) + c~o t a j ]I [it 2 a j (cfo - c~o) 1, (16)
nitude and rapid reversals in the phase of R indicate the
j= 1,2, presence of propagating modes, in this case Lamb waves, in
rl= [(k~ _tl)c~2 +(k~ _t2)C~0 the plate. 10,l1 From the angle of incidence of the ultrasonic
beam, the phase velocity of the Lamb wave can be inferred.
+ t 2(cio - c~0)(cf2 - 1)J/2c~0 202' We assume here that the Lamb wave vector equals the wave
(17) vector projection of the longitudinal wave from the fluid
r2=(k~ -t2)(k~ _t2)!c~0 202' onto the surface of the plate, cf!cL = sin 8. As discussed by
ko = OJ/Co, kl = OJ/c l , Schoch 10 this approximation is justified. for the conditions of
where the current study. It has been shown 11 that small errors are
possible in a narrow range offrequency times plate thickness
2o=Elp, ~=j.L*/p,
for the two lowest-order modes. Velocity dbpersion curves
cfo = (iL * + z,.t*)/E, ~o =/1-*/E, (1.8) can then be constructed by examining the reflection coeffi-
cfl =(iL*+z,.t*)I/1-*, C~2 =E*Ij.L*,
cient over a fi3,t;.ge of angles of incidence. Similar computa-
tions for isotropic or orthotropic plates either with or with-
1.0 - 100
out fluid loading have been carried out by others. 10-17
~ ILIEXPERiMENTAL TECHNIQUE
1\ I,
1\ " 60 An experimental study has been perfonned in conjunc-
I,
1\ I,
I' I tion with our theoretical investigations to test the range of
I I
I validity of the model calculation and its dependence on sig-
I I
I I nificant parameters. We have varied the plate thickness,
I I
\ I \ I composite fiber content, ultrasound frequency, and inci-
\ I \ I dence angle in the course of many measurements on five
\ I \ I
0.2 , I , I -60 different samples of unidirectional glass-epoxy composite
,I ,.
\'
plates. To speed acquisition and reduction of the data, the
0.~--~~~~--:~~~:--J~~~~:--~~--~·400
experiment and subsequent d.ata analysis are performed un-
0.0 08 1.6 2.4 3.2 4.0 4.8 5.6 64
FREQ (MHz)
der computer control.
Samples for this study are flat pl.ates approximately 10
FIG. 4. Ultrasonic plane-wave reflection coefficient from a composite plate
as calculated according to Eq. (14). Magnitude is solid curve; phase is plot- by 15 em, which have been fabricated from nonwoven
ted as dashed curve. Scotchply glass-reinforced plastic, type 1003, supplied by
4534 J. Appl. Phys., Vol. 58, No. 12,15 December 1985 D. E. Chimenti and A. H. Nayfeh 4534
Sine = 18 0
10
/---. - - - 2.19 MHz
I \ - - - - - 1.99MHz
~
8 - - - 2.39MHz
6 ~
I
//-'
\
I I
I
I 'i
4 I \
I \
I , \
2 I
I
I
\\
'"'
Y
I
\~~
0
-180 -12.0 -6.0 0.0 12.0 18.0 240 30.0
X(mm)
5.6
FIG. 6. Profile of reflected beam at and near the Lamb angle for a 1. 14-mm
FREQ (MHz)
glass-epoxy plate in water. Solid curve at Lamb condition corresponds to
2.19 MHz. Chained and dashed curves are 200 kHz above and below this FIG. 7. Deconvolved reflection spectrum from a 1.35-mm composite plate.
frequency, respectively. Strong null occurs only when Lamb waves are gen- Incident angle is 24°. Deep minima indicate excitation ofLarnb waves in the
erated. plate. Transducer center frequency is 2.2 MHz.
4535 J. Appl, Phys., Vol, 58, No. 12,15 December 1985 D. E. Chimenti and A. H. Nayfeh 4535
7.6 d = 0.56, 1.14 mm VF = .67 7.6
d = 1.35 mm
6.5 6.5
u
~
"-
~ 5.4
-' -'
w w
> >
w 4 .3 w 4.3
<f) <f)
<l <l
:I: :I:
0. 0.
3.2 3.2
FIG. 9. Velocity dispersion for Lamb waves in glass-epoxy composite plates FIG. 10. Velocity dispersion in a glass-epoxy plate 1.35 mm thick. Solid
0.56 and 1.14 mm in thickness. Model calculation assumes fiber volume curve is theory; data are discrete points.
fraction of 0.67. Theory is solid curve; experimental data are discrete points.
reflected field, corresponding to the existence of Lamb
waves. Some degree of scatter is seen in these and subsequent
In a separate stepped-frequency experiment, ultrasonic
data. We attribute this feature to a lack of uniformity in the
reflection from an isotropic bulk reflector is measured at a
glass-epoxy specimens. Rather good detailed a~reement is
similar incident angle, water-path distance, and x position.
seen between the prediction of our model calculatIOn and the
This transfer function is used to deconvolve the transducer
experimental data for the two thinnest samples in the series.
response from the raw data on the composite samples. An
The model accurately follows the trend of the data for all
example of the result of that operation is shown in Fig. 7. We
modes we observe. At the lower left in Fig. 9 the measured
plot the deconvolved signal amplitude as a function of fre-
and calculated phase velocities of mode extinction for the
quency for a composite plate 1.35 mm thick. Excellent sig-
lowest-order symmetric mode are very close. The pro-
nal-to-noise ratio and clear definition of the minima are ap-
nounced lateral shift in the data near 5.0 km/s is well. repro-
parent in these data. Figure 7 is similar to the magnitude
duced by the model and corresponds to the effective longitu-
curve of the calculated reflection coefficient seen in Fig. 4.
dinal critical angle of the composite plate. A similar, but less
Since the data are an integration over angle of the beam pro-
dramatic, effect can be detected in the calculation of Fig. 8
file with the reflection coefficient, it is expected that the ex-
on an isotropic aluminum plate.
act functional shapes of the curves in Figs. 4 and 7 will differ.
In Fig. 9 and subsequent results we have treated the
However, it can be demonstrated that the minima in R (Fd,e)
volume fraction of the fibers as a slightly adjustable param-
coincide with the onset of the null zone shown in Fig. 6,
eter, the only one in the model. The difference between the
indicating the presence of leaky Lamb waves in the plate.
measured fiber fraction and the one assumed in the theory
To verify our experimental procedure and data analysis,
curve of Fig. 9 is about 8 vol %. Experimental determina-
we have undertaken some preliminary measurements on alu-
tions of fiber fraction are performed at the edge of the speci-
minum plates. Lamb waves in aluminum plates have been
men and carry an uncertainty of 1 vol. %, but spatial varia-
studied extensively (see Ref. 22 and references contained
tions in the fiber fraction can be larger than that for glass
therein) and so offer a good opportunity for comparison. In
epoxy and can reduce the reproducibility of the data, ~s r~
Fig. 8 we show the results of dispersion measurements on an
ferred to earlier. The experimental fiber volume fractIOn IS
aluminum plate (Al707 5-T6 alloy) compared with our model
also sensitive to the assumed densities of the composite con-
calculation, where both materials in the model are alumi-
stituents. Another factor contributing to this disparity may
num. Very good detailed agreement at incident angles from
0 0
14 to 26 gives us confidence in the validity of our approach. 7.6
d = 1.63mm VF=.58
The two curves at the extreme left are the lowest-order sym-
~
metric and antisymmetric modes, which approach the Ray- 6.5
leigh wave velocity at large Fd. The higher-order modes con- u
~
verge to the transverse wave velocity. "-
~ 5.4
III. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION .J
w
>
Experimental. measurements of leaky Lamb wave dis- '"
<f)
4.3
persion in gl.ass-epoxy composite plates, compared to the <l
l:
0.
model calculations outlined in Sec. II, are presented in the 3.2
next series of plots. Figure 9 shows dispersion data and the-
ory for unidirectional composite plates 0.56 and 1.14 mm
2.1
thick. The phase velocities appropriate to Lamb eigenmodes 0 2
of the plate are plotted as a function of frequency times plate
thickness. The continuous curves are the model, and the dis- FIG. 11. Velocity dispersion in a glass-epoxy plate 1.63 mm thick. Solid
crete points are the experimental positions of minima in the curve is theory; data are discrete points.
4536 J. Appl. Phys., Vol. 58, NO.12,15 December 1985 D. E. Chimenti and A. H. Nayfeh 4536
7.6
d = 2.03 mm VF =.55 extrapolating the higher-order mode curves to large phase
velocity, we have identified the symmetry of each of the first
6.5 six modes. According to a well-known analysis,23 each of the
u.
'"
"-
higher-order modes approaches a standing wave at normal
~ 5.4 incidence. Integral transverse and half-integral longitudinal
-'
wavelengths in the plate correspond to symmetric modes,
'">
",4.3
while the reverse combination yields the antisymmetric
Vl
<t
modes. For the three mode overlaps we have examined, the
:x: pairs consist of one of each mode type. It is also possible that
Q.
3.2 the modes in this region are distinct but not resolvable within
the seven-digit accuracy of the numerical computations.
Since we evaluate the theoretical reflection coefficient
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 along the real Fd axis to identify the Lamb eigenmodes, cri-
Fd (MHz - mm)
teria for mode identification is a significant consideration.
FIG. 12. Velocity dispersion in a glass-epoxy plate 2.03 mm thick. Solid Initially, we searched for minima in the magnitUde of
curve is theory; data are discrete points.
R (Fd,e ) accompanied by rapid phase reversals, as illustrated
in Fig. 4. However, above a phase velocity of about 5.0 km/s,
be the small degree of fiber nonparallelism or variations in this method yielded equivocal results. A more reliable mea-
fiber-matrix wetting introduced when samples are pressed to sure of propagating modes in the plate is the large positive
a desired thickness. In spite of these material limitations and change in the phase of R (Fd,e ) by itself. In particular, this
considering the complexity of the composite, we have found phase reversal is a clear indication of passage beneath a
excellent agreement between these and subsequent measure- Lamb wave pole or between a pole-zero pair. Yet, detailed
ments and our straightforward model calculation. examination of the reflection coefficient in the range from
Data and analysis for a thicker plate (d = 1.35 mm) are 5.2 to 5.8 km/s reveals, by this criterion, no behavior sugges-
given in Fig. 10. Here, we have taken the fiber volume frac- tive of the existence of more than one Lamb-wave mode.
tion to be 0.63, or about 8 vol % higher than the density This observation leads us to conclude that the abrupt con-
determination on a coupon cut from the corner of this speci- vergence of the symmetric and antisymmetric modes
men. After this adjustment, many of the features of the pre- between 5.2 and 5.8 km/s is a fundamental property of the
vious comparison can be identified here as well. Over the model. Our data seem to support this conclusion.
entire spectrum the agreement is rather convincing, even The last aspect of the data upon which we comment is
better than the previous results. Only for some of the higher- the lack of reinstatement of both higher-order modes above
order modes is the comparison less favorable. But it should 5.8 km/s. Although the model predicts that, in every case,
be noted that these modes are highly sensitive to small varia- mode pairs reestablish distinct branches above this velocity,
tions in the material properties. Data and theory on two only in the data of Fig. 9 for the A 1 and S 1 modes is there
additional samples at plate thicknesses of 1.63 and 2.03 mm experimental evidence of this behavior. Examination of the
are presented in Figs. 11 and 12. These results display a simi- calculated reflection coefficient in this region shows marked
lar close agreement between measurement and model, al- differences in the depth of minima in the magnitude of Rand
though because of transducer bandwidth limitations, only degree of variation in the phase from one mode to the next.
Our previous work 20•21 suggests that these differences are
limited data could be collected on the lowest order symmet-
related to the strength of mode excitation. We conjecture,
ric mode. In each case the fiber volume fraction assumed in
the calculation has been about 5 vol % larger than the ex- therefore, that above 5.8 km/s the higher-order modes
which are predicted, but not observed, are much less strong-
perimental density measurements, which is consistent with
ly excited than those we could measure.
the results on the thinner specimens. Since our theoretical
model is a fairly simplified approximation to the real com-
posite, the slight adjustment (-15%) applied to the fiber iV. CONCLUSIONS
volume fraction is not unreasonable. Moreover, the values of In summary, we have calculated the effective homogen-
the constituent elastic constants we have used, which were eous anisotropic elastic behavior of a unidirectional compos-
obtained from the manufacturer. are experimental averages ite laminate in the long-wavelength limit using a two-step
over many measurements. Deviations from these average procedure based on alternating layered media. This interme-
values are certainly possible. We observe that the calculated diate result has then been incorporated into a calculation of
mode structure is relatively sensitive to the moduli of the the ultrasonic reflection coefficient of a fluid-loaded aniso-
constituents; therefore, uncertainty in the elastic constants tropic plate, which has been taken as an approximation to
must be considered a source of systematic error. the inhomogeneous composite laminate. Extensive experi-
An unusual feature of the calculations which is discern- mental results have been presented on Lamb-wave disper-
ible in all the data is the brief apparent coincidence of the sion in five composite specimens of different thickness. It is
symmetric and anti symmetric modes at the longitudinal important to state that the real composite can, and probably
wave speed in the dispersion results. These curves, extending will, deviate in several significant ways from the ideal mor-
downward from 5.2 km/s and upward from 5.8 km/s, ap- phology we have assumed in our model calculation. The fi-
parently merge into a single feature between those values. By bers will not always be perfectly aligned or evenly distribut-
4537 J. Appl. Phys., Vol. 58, No. 12, 15 December 1985 D. E. Chimenti and A. H. Nayfeh 4537
ed, leading to resin-rich and resin-starved regions in the 3A. Bedford and M. Stern, J. Appl. Mech. 38, 8 (1971).
plate. Furthermore, depending on its fabrication, some of 4B. Lempriere, Lockheed Palo Alto Research Laboratory, Report No.
LMSC-6-78-69-2I, (1969).
the composite's fibers will touch one another, or they may 5S. Minagawa, S. Nemat-Nasser, and M. Yamada, Int. J. Numer. Methods
not be in perfect welded contact with the matrix in all areas Eng. 17,1335 (1981).
of the laminate. Considering the complexity and potential 6G. A. Hegemier, G. A. Gurtman, and A. H. Nayfeh, Int. J. Solids Struct.
9,395 (1973).
nonideality of the real composite and the relative simplicity
7A. H. Nayfeh and G. A. Gurtman, J. Appl. Mech. 41,106 (1974).
of our theoretical model, the comparison between our calcu- SA. H. Nayfeh and E. A. Nasser, J. App\. Mech. 45,822 (1977).
lations and experimental measurements has yielded remar- 9A. H. Nayfeh, Fibre Sci. Technol. 10, 195 (1977).
kable agreement. lOA. Schoch, Acustica 2,1 (1952).
ilL. E. Pitts, T. J. Plona, and W. G. Mayer, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 60, 374
(1976).
12R. Fiorito, W. Madigosky, and H. Uberall, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 66,1857
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS (1979).
13T. J. Plona, L. E. Pitts, and W. G. Mayer, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 59, 1324
It is our pleasure to acknowledge the expert computer (1976).
programming assistance ofK. D. Shimmin and Jeffrey Fox. 14G. Maidanik, J. Sound Vih. 3, 288 (1966).
We also wish to thank R. J. Andrews and his staff at the ISD. C. Woriton, J. Appl. Phys. 32, 967 (1961).
University of Dayton Research Institute for providing the 16M. Heckl, Acustica 10, 109 (1960).
17M. F. M. Osborne and S. D. Hart, 1. Acoust. Soc. Am. 17, 1 (1945).
characterized samples of glass-epoxy composite. Funding 18Fiber: C II = 73.1, Coo = 29.9 GPa, p = 2.55; matrix: CII = 3.45,
for this work was provided by the Air Force Office of Scienti- Coo = 1.28 GPa,p = 1.25.
fie Research and the National Science Foundation. 19 A. H. Nayfeh, D. E. Chimenti, L. Adler, and R. L. Crane, J. Appl. Phys.
52,4985 (1981).
2°D. E. Chimenti, A. H. Nayfeh, and D. L. Butler, 1. App!. Phys. 53, 170
(1982).
'G. W. Postma, Geophysics 20,780 (1955). 21A. H. Nayfeh and D. E. Chimenti. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 75,1360 (1984).
2c. T. Sun, J. D. Achenbach, and G. Herrmann, J. App). Mech. 35, 476 Z2L. J. Derner and L. H. Fentnor, J. Nondestr. Test. 27.121 (1969).
(1968). 231. A. Viktorov. Rayleigh and Lamb Waves (Plenum, New York, 1967).
4538 J. Appl. Phys., Vol. 58, No. 12, 15 December 1985 D. E. Chimenti and A. H. Nayfeh 4538