Solid Rocket Motor Propulsion

Solid rocket motor propulsion
Satellite design & engineering
A. SQUELARD
Propulsion basics
Solid Rocket Motors Propulsion - ULg - 02.10.2017 2

Principles of propulsion
A reaction force (thrust) is created by the ejection of gas.
F ≈ q . Ve
The thrust created by a balloon is clearly not sufficient !
Let’s try to improve this technology !
Furthermore, the pressure in the balloon drops quickly !
We must find a way to maintain the pressure inside the motor.
We need to increase q and Ve
To do that, the best solution is to use a controllable exothermic chemical reaction that transforms a liquid
or a solid into a gas at high temperature : the commonest one is : combustion, but there are other
solutions !

Other types of propulsion

Liquid or solid propulsion
We will limit ourselves to combustion, and give the advantages of the two solutions
LIQUID
• High specific impulse
• Re-ignition and throttling possible
SOLID (fuel and oxidizer mixed in one solid

block (grain)
• Can deliver high thrust from a limited volume
• Almost immediate availability
• High reliability
• Moderate costs
From now on, we will limit ourselves to solid propulsion.

Solid propulsion
To reach sufficient thrusts, we will have to operate at pressures of several tens to hundreds bars, and eject
the gasses at supersonic velocities.
Therefore, the main elements of a solid rocket motor are :
IGNITION SYSTEM THERMAL PROTECTION
PROPELLANT
NOZZLE
CASING
History and applications
The first utilization dates back to 7th century, when black powder was invented in China, as
incendiary arrows.
Propelled arrows were found in the 11th century, also in China

History (2)
The first scientific study is made by William Congreve, and the first rockets were used in battles against
Napoleon, in particular Waterloo (1815).

History and applications
In 1888, Alfred Nobel discovers the
homogeneous double base
propellants, and that leads the way
to military applications, which start
growing during WWII.
Are well known the Stalin organs

C-130 takes off with the help of JATO rockets
(USSR – 1941), the anti-tank
weapons like the Panzerfaust
(Germany – 1943), and the bazooka
(USA – 1944).
We find also applications to
accelerate vehicles : (Opel car – 1928)
and the JATO system (USA – 1942)
M13 rocket for Stalin organ
Opel rocket car RAK-1 – 1928 -

Modern applications : military
Missiles
Strategic – ICBM Trident D2 (US) Tactical – air-to-air MICA (France) Tactical : anti-tank LAHAT (Israel)
Boosters for missiles
Tomahawk cruise missile (US)

Modern applications : civilian
Launcher stages Launcher boosters Other applications
STAR-5D rocket motors used to

decelerate Mars Pathfinder to
AJ-60A boosters mounted on Atlas V launcher zero velocity on the Martian
surface
Vega launcher – 3 solid propellant stages

The propellant grain
We have to define two parameters : composition and shape : these will define the performance and the
thrust law of our motor.
COMPOSITION
History :
The first propellant was black powder (mixture of sulfur, charcoal and saltpeter [KNO3]). Inefficient as
propellant.
From end of XIX° century : homogeneous double base propellants : mixture of nitrocellulose and
nitroglycerine. Still in use today (smokeless), but not able to be used in large motors (tens to hundreds of
tons.

Composite propellants
Criteria of choice :
Energetic performances (high reaction temperature)

Kinetic performances (combustion velocity)
Mechanical behavior (resistance to loads)
Safety and vulnerability (resistance to unwanted ignition)
Resistance to ageing (life duration in storage)
Cost in production
Interface specifications
I will present here the composition that all the above requirements, and is used on all space launchers :
• Ammonium perchlorate (oxidizer) (70 %)
• Aluminum powder (fuel) (15 %)
• Polybutadiene matrix (binder and fuel) (12%)

Composite propellants
Ammonium perchlorate is a white powder. Its particle size controls :

• The viscosity
• The combustion velocity
• The particle size of Al2O3 (combustion by-product)
Aluminum is used in the form of powder. It increases

the reaction temperature
The polybutadiene is a polymer that allows cross-linking between

chains after curing, giving to the propellant grain its mechanical
properties.
The propellant grain
After ignition, the burning reaction takes place on the free surface of the propellant.
The mass flow, and consequently the thrust generated by a propellant grain is proportional to the
combustion surface at any moment of its operation.
Assuming that the combustion velocity is the same in all directions, the combustion proceeds in parallel
layers.
Therefore, the thrust depends on the motor and the propellant grain geometries.
This initial geometry is the only way to control the thrust law of a solid rocket motor.
There are many geometries according to the required thrust law

Shapes of propellant grain
Cylindrical shape
Star shape
Axisymmetric shape with teeth

Cylindrical shape with rear finocyl

Shapes of propellant grains and thrust laws

Grain shape and thrust law : case of Ariane 5 MPS

Solid propulsion fundamental equations
Γ
ρ . Vc . Sc = CD . Pc . At = gas mass flow
Where ρ = propellant density
Vc = combustion velocity /
Sc = surface of combustion With Γ .
CD = nozzle discharge coefficient
PC = combustion pressure
At = nozzle throat area
For most solid propellants :
Vc = a . ( Pc )n with n < 1

Operation point of a solid rocket motor
n < 1 (curve concavity
oriented to the bottom)
means stable operation
for the motor.
n < 1 for most

propellants, but not all !
SAFETY !!
The linear burning rate of the

propellant is the velocity at
which the chemical reaction
progresses under the effect of
conduction and radiation and is
function of pressure, but also of
the initial temperature

Propellant grain design
VERY, VERY SIMPLIFIED !
Requirements Propellants database Ballistics + structural integrity

(see next page)
Choice of propellant Choice of grain geometry

(fuel + oxidizer)
Thrust = f (t)

Requirements for propellant design
• Energy performance : Isp , Tc , density

• Kinetic performances : maximum pressure, overall dimensions, weight
• Resistance to loads : shrinkage during curing, long-term storage, thermal
cycles, firing
• Safety : resistance to mechanical or electrical aggression
• Resistance to ageing
• Compliance with interface specifications
• Production cost

Main steps to manufacture a propellant grain
Perchlorate manufacturing Pre-mixing of polybutadiene with

with particles size control aluminum powder and additives*
Additives :
Mixing • Burning rate

modifiers (Fe2 O3)
• Surface agents
• Catalysts
Vacuum casting • Anti-oxidants
Controls : propellant integrity Curing

through X-ray inspections, few days at 60°C
ballistic data and mechanical
characteristics through
samples
Thermal protections
• Protects the casing from combustion gas when propellant has completely burned
• Inhibits the combustion where it is not needed (on Ariane MPS : frontal PT)
• Controls the loads due to propellant shrinkage when curing
• Made of rubber + additives

Thermal protections

Thermal protections installation
On metallic casings :
• Two possible processes
• TP is installed on a mandrel, polymerized, machined, and then installed in the casing
• TP in raw rubber is installed inside the casing by winding or draping and then polymerized in an
autoclave.
On composite casings :
TP is wound around a mandrel, polymerized, machined, and then the casing is wound around the PTI.

Thermal protections installation
Rubber tape machine feeding
Manual draping on mandrel Automatic winding machine

Casings (structures)
Two types of casings :
Metallic : steel or aluminum
Composite : carbon, glass or Kevlar fibers embedded in resin (epoxy)
The criteria of choice are :
• Production costs (raw materials, machines, control equipment, manufacturing difficultness)

• Performance (weight / allowable stress)
• Resistance to environment (heat, mechanical or chemical aggression)
• Other constraints (interfaces)

Comparison between materials

Metallic casings
Example : MPS of Ariane 5
Material : Steel D6AC

Domes : disk formed in shape of domes
Cylinders : from
preforms flow-forming
into cylinders, then
heat treatment and
welding of three
cylinders

Composite casings
Carbon fiber
Polymerization in autoclave
OR Winding on TP
Pre-impregnated fibers
Mandrel removal and final

machining

Composite casings
There are essentially two types of winding : polar and hoop
P80 (1st stage of VEGA) winding

Composite casings
Finished P80 composite casing Finished Pathfinder booster segment (Prototype

for SLS booster)

Booster segments
• For space launchers, the propellant grains are manufactured in several segments.
• To cast a booster grain in one piece would require huge installations for casting, handling and
transportation.
• However, progress is made, and newer boosters stages are manufactured in one segment.

Booster segments (2)

Joints
The joints between the segments are critical for safety. Any hot gas leak to the outside of the booster
can have catastrophic consequences
Casing tightness is made by redundant o-rings
Thermal protection tightness is made by a labyrinth geometry filled with grease. No flow → the gasses
cool rapidly.
Problem : the casing inflates when the inside pressure increases and the geometry around the o-rings
changes : the pressure has to close gaps and not open them.

Joints (2)
Primary and secondary

o-rings
Labyrinth filled with grease
Deformation under pressure (5x)

The Challenger Space Shuttle accident
Description

The technical cause
At low temperatures, the elastomeric o-rings became hard, and
they were sensitive to hot gas erosion. This was a known problem
because it was seen on previous flights, but was considered as an
acceptable risk (because of the redundancy of the secondary o-ring.)
This resulted in a hot gas plume impacting the booster attachment
point on the external tank, and eventually a large flame perforating
the hydrogen tank wall. This caused the external tank explosion, and
the vehicle breakup.

The organizational causes
Reference : “The Challenger Launch Decision” by Diane Vaughan
1. Normalization of deviance : increase of “acceptable risk” criteria : several observations of eroded o-

rings became more and more acceptable, and the argument of the redundancy of the secondary O-
ring was more and more used, but wrong.
2. Culture of production : initially, NASA was managed by technicians, but it became more complex and
bureaucratic, and the budgetary constraints transformed the organization into a production
organization, with the objective to recommend launch in all cases.
3. Secrecy of information : the way information circulates, the processes, and the structure of
regulatory relations have as a result that the information available to the top managers is filtered,
and technical details, considered by engineers as “acceptable risk” were not clearly presented.

The lessons
1. The assessment of risks may not rely upon routine evaluations. In a production process, you may not
use the argument “This has been already accepted” because other influential factors, or the
environment, may have changed.
2. The budget scarcities, or the delay constraints, or the bureaucratic organization may not change the
risk evaluation or let you use a limited rationale, not taking into account all the contributing factors.
3. The way information is relayed to top decision makers, and the way this information is presented
(this is particularly true for statistics) must be carefully crafted, and must not deform the engineering
reality.

The nozzle (theory)
Objective : to transform thermal energy of the gasses into kinetic energy.
Modelling of nozzle operation needs several simplifying assumptions :

• Combustion and expansion are two separate phenomena happening respectively in the
combustion chamber and the nozzle.
• The expansion in the nozzle is isentropic
• The flow is one-dimensional.
• The gas kinetic energy at the entrance of the nozzle is negligible.
• The gas flow occurs without separating from the nozzle wall.
• The combustion gas is a perfect gas, and its molecular weight and γ are constant.

Nozzle theory (2)
We shall use the following variables :
• P, T and ρ : respectively pressure, temperature and density
• V : gas flow velocity
• A : cross section of the nozzle
• R : universal gas constant
• a : the speed of sound
• M : the Mach number
And the following equations :

.
• The Mariotte law : .
• The continuity equation : . . !" "
• The energy conservation equation : 2. .Δ .
• The Mayer formula : % &

The nozzle theory (3)
From all the above, we can deduce :
'( '
• The Hugoniot formula : ( % 1 ,showing that on a convergent-divergent nozzle :
• The gas velocity increases continuously;
• The gas velocity is equal to the speed of sound at the throat (M = 1)
• There is a maximum exhaust velocity, reached through isentropic expansion until absolute vacuum :
* 2. . + 2. . . +
%1
• The isentropic flow allows us to write :

-
-./
, , ,

The nozzle theory (4)
The velocity at the exit cone section can be written :
-./
1 - ,
0 * 1% where is the expansion ratio.
, 1
To best see the influence of various parameters, this can be rewritten :
-./
1 -
0 . + 1%
,
The exhaust velocity increases with + , and the expansion ratio, and when the gas molar mass decreases.

The nozzle – Example of Ariane 5 MPS
Throat
Rubber
Phenolic composites
Carbon/carbon composites
The nozzle : objectives
1. Transform the thermal energy into kinetic energy.
2. Give a guidance capability by allowing movement of the nozzle
Some figures for MPS nozzle :

• Mass : 6,1 tons
• Throat diameter : 900 mm
• Exit diameter : 2,9 m
• Gimbal angle : 7,1°
The design of a nozzle is very difficult : use of FE thermomechanical model, with complex phenomena like
ablation (material is stripped off through action of 3000 K gas at high velocity.) Also the characterization of
complex materials like carbon/carbon composites at high temperatures is very difficult. And finally, the
loads are difficult to evaluate, due to the very high temperature gradients through the nozzle wall.

The nozzle : operation
Ablated zone
Temperature
Pyrolysis
gas
Pyrolized zone Efficiency zone

The performance calculation of the motor must take into account the nozzle
ablation and the corresponding diameter increase.

Piloting a launcher through nozzle orientation
To reach this objective, the nozzle must be movable in all directions, under control of two actuators
positioned at 90° of each other.
One end of each actuator is fixed on the nozzle, the other end on the stage structure.
Therefore, there must be a flexible object between the nozzle and the stage : on the MPS, it is the flex
seal.

The flex seal
It is composed of alternating spherical layers of steel and rubber. The rubber must remain in compression
under all loads. The flex seal must be protected from the hot gasses by a membrane.
Membrane
This design allows high stiffness in

compression, but low stiffness in
shear.

The ignition system

The ignition system
It is essentially a small solid propellant

motor whose objective is to send hot gas
and particles onto the motor propellant
grain to ignite it.
On the Ariane 5 EAP, it is a 3-stage
ignition system :
1. A pyrotechnic ignition system made
of BKNO3 pellets.
2. A relay charge
3. The main charge.

Thrust oscillations
This behavior can be observed on most Absolute pressure
solid propellant motors
Dynamic transducer (=with

high-pass filter)

Thrust oscillations
These oscillations are of a few tenths of % in pressure, but of few % in thrust. This amounts to several kN !
The frequency of one of the modes can dangerously approach the structural resonant modes of the stage
or the launcher, and possibly cause damage to the payloads !
This phenomenon has been actively investigated since the years 1970 : the origin is now understood : it
comes from the interaction of vortices at the nozzle entrance and the acoustical cavity formed by the last
segment of the booster.
The last segment is a hollow cylinder which has an acoustic longitudinal resonant frequency which varies
slowly with time.
Vortices are created in the gas flow according to several phenomena.

Thrust oscillations
1. Parietal vortices (created by the interaction of turbulent flow along the wall)
2. Obstacles vortices (created by inhibitor rings)
3. Discontinuity vortices (geometry of

propellant grain)

Thrust oscillations
The frequency of these vortex shedding is characterized by a dimensionless number called Strouhal
3 *
number : 2" 4
, where L is a characteristic length, f the frequency of the vortex
shedding, and U is the flow velocity.
The pressure oscillations created by

the vortices create a coupling with
the combustion velocity, which
resonates for certain frequencies
corresponding to specific Strouhal
numbers

Thrust oscillations

Solid propellant stage qualification
1. Through a qualification flight and, if possible, recovery.
On Ariane 5, there are only a few (20) telemetry sensors, not sufficient to evaluate the correct
operation of the whole EAP stage.
For qualification flights, specific transducers have been added.
The recovery was made on a few stages, but needed a complex parachute system.

Solid propellant stage qualification
2. Through a firing test on the ground
Necessitates a specific firing test bench, and an additional operational stage, unusable to launch a
satellite !
But : it eliminates the reentry damage, and allows much more measurements (in theory, no limit in the
ground telemetry system), and can later be used for production improvements qualification.
BEAP Kourou NASA Test bench for SLS booster, Utah, USA

ARTA 6 MPS firing test

Hybrid propulsion
This type of rocket engine uses liquid oxygen or nitrous
oxide as oxidizer.
The main advantage of hybrid propulsion is that the propellant burn rate is
driven by the oxidizer flow rate, and is therefore independent of defects in the
propellant grain like cracks, debonding. It is also safer to handle and
manufacture, is controllable, and has a higher Isp than solid propulsion.

Hybrid propulsion
SpaceShip One
That is why this type of
propulsion is used on a
commercial human space
flight project : SpaceShip One
and Two, by the company
Scaled Composites.
SpaceShipTwo was destroyed in

flight due to premature aerodynamic
brake deployment.
SpaceShipTwo and White

Knight mother ship

Thank you for your attention !

Solid Rocket Motor Propulsion

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Solid Rocket Motor Propulsion

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Solid Rocket Motor Propulsion

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Solid rocket motor propulsion

Satellite design & engineering

Solid Rocket Motors Propulsion - ULg - 02.10.2017 2

A reaction force (thrust) is created by the ejection of gas.

Solid Rocket Motors Propulsion - ULg - 02.10.2017 3

Solid Rocket Motors Propulsion - ULg - 02.10.2017 4

SOLID (fuel and oxidizer mixed in one solid

From now on, we will limit ourselves to solid propulsion.

IGNITION SYSTEM THERMAL PROTECTION

Propelled arrows were found in the 11th century, also in China

Solid Rocket Motors Propulsion - ULg - 02.10.2017 7

Solid Rocket Motors Propulsion - ULg - 02.10.2017 8

Are well known the Stalin organs

M13 rocket for Stalin organ

Solid Rocket Motors Propulsion - ULg - 02.10.2017 9

Opel rocket car RAK-1 – 1928 -

Boosters for missiles

Tomahawk cruise missile (US)

Solid Rocket Motors Propulsion - ULg - 02.10.2017 10

STAR-5D rocket motors used to

Vega launcher – 3 solid propellant stages

Solid Rocket Motors Propulsion - ULg - 02.10.2017 11

Solid Rocket Motors Propulsion - ULg - 02.10.2017 12

Energetic performances (high reaction temperature)

Solid Rocket Motors Propulsion - ULg - 02.10.2017 13

Ammonium perchlorate is a white powder. Its particle size controls :

Aluminum is used in the form of powder. It increases

The polybutadiene is a polymer that allows cross-linking between

Solid Rocket Motors Propulsion - ULg - 02.10.2017 15

Axisymmetric shape with teeth

Solid Rocket Motors Propulsion - ULg - 02.10.2017 16

Solid Rocket Motors Propulsion - ULg - 02.10.2017 17

Solid Rocket Motors Propulsion - ULg - 02.10.2017 18

For most solid propellants :

Solid Rocket Motors Propulsion - ULg - 02.10.2017 19

n < 1 for most

The linear burning rate of the

Solid Rocket Motors Propulsion - ULg - 02.10.2017 20

Requirements Propellants database Ballistics + structural integrity

Choice of propellant Choice of grain geometry

Solid Rocket Motors Propulsion - ULg - 02.10.2017 21

• Energy performance : Isp , Tc , density

Solid Rocket Motors Propulsion - ULg - 02.10.2017 22

Perchlorate manufacturing Pre-mixing of polybutadiene with

Mixing • Burning rate

Controls : propellant integrity Curing

Solid Rocket Motors Propulsion - ULg - 02.10.2017 24

Solid Rocket Motors Propulsion - ULg - 02.10.2017 25

Solid Rocket Motors Propulsion - ULg - 02.10.2017 26

Rubber tape machine feeding

Manual draping on mandrel Automatic winding machine

Solid Rocket Motors Propulsion - ULg - 02.10.2017 27

Two types of casings :

Metallic : steel or aluminum

Composite : carbon, glass or Kevlar fibers embedded in resin (epoxy)

The criteria of choice are :

• Production costs (raw materials, machines, control equipment, manufacturing difficultness)

Solid Rocket Motors Propulsion - ULg - 02.10.2017 28

Solid Rocket Motors Propulsion - ULg - 02.10.2017 29