The Effects of Smart-Shaming To Oral Discourse Chapter 1
The Effects of Smart-Shaming To Oral Discourse Chapter 1
The Effects of Smart-Shaming To Oral Discourse Chapter 1
Sarmiento Campus
Education Department
A.Y. 2018-2019
Submitted by
Dandin, Michelle
Submitted to
Marites Valendez
I. Introduction
the form of shaming (Rodriguez, 2017). “Edi wow!” (Then wow!), “Ikaw na matalino!”
(You’re the smart one!), and “Ikaw na magaling.” (You know it all.) are some of the
your friend leads to various possibilities. Beside the emotions being obstructed by the
dropped statement, the flow of facts and information has been clogged leading to the
wherein the speaker is being shamed for knowing a certain ideology that he has shared to
the listener. Totalitarian governments apply and manipulate this movement to repress
political dissent. This repression of the intellect is evident not just in European and
American history but as well in our own during the Spanish colonization.
In the time of social media and the rise of global communication, smart-shaming is
very evident. Give this; it is undeniable that we are in the age of knowledge. The
information and facts are free-flowing in our surroundings through fraud issues are
rampant. In this flow of data, smart-shaming is still in action. How does this affect by
discourse and find out specifically how it becomes a variable on the image of the
and interaction humans have. Through communication, people share information and
emotion, solve conflict, build relationships and initiate innovation and growth. Crucially,
conversations involve more than just the autonomous encoding and decoding of linguistic
messages—that is, utterances are not simply a ‘conduit’ for information transmission
between independent speakers and listeners (Cherry, 1956; Reddy, 1979). Clark (1996)
and Garrod (1999) stated that in the vast majority of conversational situations, the
contribution is shaped by what has been said previously in the discourse and in turn
strongly shape what follows next. This then lead the researchers to hypothesize on what
became a form of comedy. Given its negative connotation, it is undeniably a problem one
should avoid and dissolve immediately. According to Cuaron. S. and Fortuno, R.C, Anti-
intellectualism is the downgrading of any intellectual display in any form which can be
traced back in history which then resulted to negative effects. Correlating the two
disciplines of language and psychology, the researchers will be trying to understand how
this action can affect communication. In addition, since conversation is a natural day-to-
day activity, we tend to overlook the concepts contributing to discourse. Therefore, the
context, conversation analysis, maxims of conversation, politeness and culture for these
culture and political psychology are highlighted more on further readings. This research
must remember that it can also be neutral and even negative. (Estoque, P., & Estoque, V.,
2009)
III. Statement of the Problem
This research study is conducted to identify the effects of smart-shaming to the oral
Campus students:
2.1. Context
2.2. Politeness
2.3. Maxims of Communication
3. When do students in Bulacan State University – Sarmiento Campus get smart-
the oral discourse as perceived by Bulacan State University- Sarmiento Campus students
V. Research Objectives
researchers.
2. The quantitative method will produce reliable data.
3. Smart-shaming can yield to both positive and negative effects.
of language above the sentence level therefore to study the larger linguistic units
communicate with others in a society and the factors that influence that
spoken discourse as well. There are three very important characteristics of discourse
that it:
a) Concerned with language use beyond the boundaries of a sentence utterance
b) Concerned with the interrelationships between language & society
c) Concerned with the interactive or dialogue properties of everyday
communication.(S. Ziauddin, personal Communication, Summer-15)
So the meaning of a sentence in use, the context of using it, what the speaker really
means and how they say it, users’ personality all need to be considered in analyzing
discourse (Cutting, 2008; Oshima, Oshima & Matsuzawa, 2012).
Study points of Discourse Analysis:
Some particular points that need to be focused on during analysing discourse are of
all are included in the context of analyzing discourse. Moreover, user’s fear for
maintaining privacy in account, implicature behind a certain status and inferences that
conversation.
perceived by the Bulacan State University- Sarmiento Campus students who belong to a
being smart-shamed.
A.3.The students may value education more.
B. Teachers
C. Community
D. Future Researchers
D.1.The future researchers have an established local study regarding the topic.
2. Context – It is the words that are used with a certain word or phrase and that helps
Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.
Alternative Proxies: