Schema Theory

Jeff Pankin
Fall 2013

Basic Concepts
Definition: Schema theory is a branch of cognitive science concerned with how the brain
structures knowledge.
A schema is an organized unit of knowledge for a subject or event. It is based on past
experience and is accessed to guide current understanding or action.

Characteristics:
 Schemas are dynamic – they develop and change based on new information and
experiences and thereby support the notion of plasticity in development.
 Schemas guide how we interpret new information and may be quite powerful in their
influence (see work of Brewer and Treyens below).
 Schemas, or schemata, store both declarative (“what”) and procedural (“how”)
information.
Declarative knowledge is knowing facts, knowing that something is the
case; procedural knowledge is knowing how to do something – perhaps
with no conscious ability to describe how it is done (Hampson & Morris,
1996).
 Declarative schemas may be thought to contain slots, or characteristics and values. For
example, a house may be described in terms of its materials, such as wood and its parts,
such as rooms. Materials and parts, are the house schema’s slots and wood and rooms
are the slot values. Slots may have default values (house purpose: to live in) though
houses may also be places of worship or museums. Schemas may have parent and child
relationships with other schemas which inherit or pass on characteristics (Anderson,
2000).
 A special slot in each schema is its isa slot, and points to the superset. Thus stored with
the schema for building, the superset of house, we would have features such that it has
a roof and walls and that it is found on the ground (Anderson, 2000).
 Schemas allow writers and speakers to make assumptions about what the reader or
listener already knows.

1
People
Major Researchers
 F. C. Bartlett in Remembering (1932) – was the first to write extensively about schemas
as they applied to procedural memory (though the distinction between declarative and
procedural had not been made yet at that time).
o Movement, e.g., driving a car or playing a sport, is not simply a matter of
stimulus-response. We do not produce an exact copy of a previous movement,
nor do we create something entirely new.
o Past experiences help us make sense of new experiences by supplying us with
expectations and frameworks for action.
o Bartlett first wrote in the early 20th century when the prevailing theory was
behaviorism, which was largely concerned with observable stimuli and behavior.
 Jean Piaget (1896-1980) – credited as first to create a cognitive development theory
which included schemas.
o New information is added or assimilated into current schemas.
o Cognitive dissonance is caused by new information which cannot be easily
integrated.
o Schemas are forced to change or accommodate this new information.
o Three factors cause cognitive development – biological development which
progresses in stages, interaction with the world of nature and objects, and
interaction with others.
 David Rumelhart (1975) – Posed that there is an underlying grammar of stories and that
experience with this grammar would help in the understanding of new stories.
 Roger Schank and Abelson (1977) – Proposed that humans develop a grammar for
procedural knowledge in the form of a script for all common events in our lives.
o They wrote a computer program which was able to answer questions about
events in a restaurant based on scripts for what typically takes place in
restaurants.
o In 1982 Schank proposed that there are deeper levels in how scripts are
organized which account for scripts which share attributes, e.g., waiting on line
at a restaurant and waiting on line at a Post Office.
 Brewer and Treyens (1981) conducted an experiment where subjects were asked to wait
in an office for 30 seconds. When removed and asked what they saw in the office, many
reported seeing things which were not present, for example, books. The presumption is
that most people’s schemas of “office” includes books.
 Alba and Hasher (1983) suggested four ways schema might affect memory:
1. Guide attention to relevant information for encoding

2
 2. Allow specific stimuli to be encoded as abstractions to be stored as meaning
without details
3. Assist in interpreting new information by providing the relevant prior knowledge
4. Provide the means to integrate the previous three steps into a single memory
and provide the framework for reconstruction of that memory when required.
 John R. Anderson (1983) formulated a model of cognition know as ACT-R (Adaptive
Control of Thought-Rational) which describes the process of encoding and using
schemas, particularly in mathematics and problem solving. He was the first to employ
the use of both declarative and procedural schema in his theory. His work is based in
neuroscience and computer artificial intelligence. ACT-R is actually published as
computer code and is made available to researchers.

Perspectives
Historical Context and Schema Research
 In the latter half of 20th century psychologists began to focus more on human cognition
and less on behaviorism.
 The widespread use of computers also had an effect on the theories of how we store
and use information in our brain. Many models of cognition were based largely on how
computers function.
 In the last 40 years, cognitive science has shifted its study from small-scale knowledge
structures e.g., encoding words and simple concepts, to the study of large-scale
knowledge structures and how they interact (Hampson & Morris, 1996).

Self-Schema and Adult Development

 Self-schema is a term used to describe knowledge we accumulate about ourselves by
interacting with the natural world and with other human beings which in turn influences
our behavior towards others and our motivations.
 The self-schema continues to develop throughout life, supporting the life-span
developmental perspective.
Because information about the self is continually coming into the system as a
result of experience and social interaction, the self-schema will be constantly
evolving over the life span (Lemme, 2006).

Schema and Adult Learning and Development

 Schema continue to develop over the course of adulthood as our microsystem,
mesosystem, and exosystem change. Even as adults retire and age they are placed in
new situations requiring the accommodation and assimilation of new knowledge and
experience.

3
 Late-life in particular is full of many complex events, which require
learning new or modifying old behaviors, particularly for health,
compensation, and adaptability. For example, changing living
arrangements from one’s home to an assisted living facility is
complex and stressful, and challenges existing coping strategies and
requires adaptive compensation (Thornton, 2003).
 Schema theory reinforces the importance of prior knowledge to learning and the use of
tools such as advance organizers and memory aids to bridge new knowledge to older
knowledge stored in schema (Merriam, Caffarella & Baumgartner, 2007).
 In post-formal thought we are better able to balance two contradicting schema by
preserving both separately, until the ability to maintain a relativistic outlook decreases
with age.

Schema and Gender

 Gender schema theory states that children develop gender schema based on their
experiences and the gender attributes of their culture. An individual’s self-schema is
merged with the culturally determined schema for their gender (Bern, 1983).
…the phenomenon of sex typing, derives, in part, from gender-schematic
processing. Specifically, the theory proposes that sex-typing results, in
part, from the assimilation of the self-concept itself to the gender
schema. As children learn the contents of their society’s gender schema,
they learn which attributes are to be linked with their own sex and,
hence with themselves (Bern, 1983).
Schema and Culture
 There are two aspects to schema and culture. First, we develop schemas for our own
and other cultures. We then may develop a schema for cultural understanding.
 Cultural information and experiences are stored in schemas and support cultural
identity.
 The nature of schemas work to support one’s own cultural identity. Once a schema is
formed it focuses our attention on aspects of the culture as experienced and by
assimilating, accommodating or rejecting aspects which don’t conform.
 “A schema for understanding culture is culture-general – that is, it reflects knowledge
that applies to all cultures” (Renstch, Mot & Abbe, 2009).
 A schema for cultural understanding contrasts with the rigid structure of a stereotype.
A schema for cultural understanding is more than just a stereotype
about the members of a culture. Whereas stereotypes tend to be rigid,
a schema is dynamic and subject to revision. Whereas stereotypes tend
to simplify and ignore group differences, a schema can be quite
complex. (Renstch, Mot & Abbe, 2009).

4
References
Anderson, J. R. (2000). Cognitive Psychology and Its Implications (5th ed.). New York, NY. Worth Publishers
Bern, S. L. (1983) Gender Schema Theory and Its Implications for Child Development: Raising Gender-Aschematic
Children in a Gender-Schematic Society. Signs. 8(4), 598-616.
Hampson, P. J. & Morris, P. E. (1996) Understanding Cognition. Cambridge, MA. Blackwell Publishers Inc.
Lemme, B. H. (2006) Development in Adulthood. Boston, MA. Pearson Education, Inc.
Merriam, S. B., Caffarella, R. S. & Baumgartner, L. M. (2007) Learning in Adulthood. San Francisco, CA. Jossey-Bass.
Rentsch, J. R., Mot, I. & Abbe, A. (2009). Identifying the Core Content and Structure of a Schema for Cultural
Understanding. (Technical Report 1251). Arlington, VA: United States Army Research Institute.
Thornton, J. E. (2003). Life-span learning: A developmental perspective. International Journal of Aging and Human
Development, 57(1), 55-76.