Just-In-Time: Study Unit Six Operational Efficiency and Business Process Performance
Just-In-Time: Study Unit Six Operational Efficiency and Business Process Performance
Just-In-Time: Study Unit Six Operational Efficiency and Business Process Performance
OPERATIONAL EFFICIENCY
AND BUSINESS PROCESS PERFORMANCE
Just-in-time
Definitions:
Just-in-time system :A comprehensive production and inventory system that purchases or produces
materials and parts only as needed and just in time to be used at each stage of the production
process.
Just-in-time (JIT) production (Also called lean production): Demand-pull manufacturing system in
which each component in a production line is produced as soon as and only when needed by the
next step in the production line..
Just-in-time (JIT) purchasing: The purchase of goods or materials so that they are delivered just as
needed for production.
Just-In-Time Inventory management systems are based on a manufacturing philosophy that
combines purchasing, production and Inventory control into one function.
Purpose
In a push system, a department produces and sends all that it can to the next step for further
processing, which means that the manufacturer is producing something without understanding
consumer demand. This can result in large, useless stocks of inventory. The main Idea of JIT is that
nothing is produced until the next process in the assembly line needs it. This demand-pull feature
requires close coordination between workstations.
Lot sizes based on immediate need are typical of just-in-time systems, while lot sizes based
on formulas are characteristic of traditional inventory management systems.
Benefits
o Reduction in the cost of carrying the inventory and reduces nonvalue adding activities.
o Greater emphasis on improving quality by eliminating the causes of rework, scrap and waste.
o Setup times are decreased.
o Lower investments in space
o The focus of quality control under JIT shifts from the discovery of defective parts to the prevention
of quality problems, so zero machine breakdowns (achieved through preventive maintenance)
and zero defects are ultimate goals. Higher quality and lower inventory go together.
o JIT increases inventory turnover (cost of sales ÷ average inventory) and decreases inventory as
a percentage of total assets.
o Backflush costing is utilized with just-in-time production as a planning and control system.
Backflush costing is less costly to operate than most traditional costing systems.
Limitations
o an increased risk of stockout costs
o JIT implementation is not appropriate for high-mix manufacturing environments, which often have
thousands of products and dozens of work centers.
kanban
A set of control cards used by workers to signal the need for materials and products to move from
one operation to the next in an assembly line
Kanban is one of the many elements in the JIT system it means “ticket " "card" or "sign" or "visual
record" or “markers” in Japanese.Workers respond only after receiving a kanban. When production is
complete, the kanban is attached to the finished order and sent downstream to the next work cell
Limitations
Manufacturing resource planning (MRP II) is a closed-loop manufacturing system that integrates
all facets of a manufacturing business, including production, sales, inventories, . schedules, and cash
flows.. The same system is used for both the financial reporting and managing operations (both use
the same transactions and numbers). Because manufacturing resource planning encompasses
materials requirements planning, MRP is a component of an MRP system.
Process of purchasing goods and services from outside vendors rather than producing the same
goods or providing the same services within the organization. For smaller business, outsourcing may
provide access to resources and expertise for capabilities they may not have internally. For larger
businesses, outsourcing can improve specific functions.
Benefits
By Outsourcing certain functions to a specialist, management can free up resources within the
company in order to focus on the primary operations of the company and strategic revenue-
generating activities.
It may also be cheaper to outsource a function to a company that specializes in an area than
It Is to run and support that function internally.
Benefits of outsourcing include reliable service, reduced costs, avoidance of the risk of
obsolescence, and access to technology.
Can improve efficiency and effectiveness by gaining outside expertise or scale
Can provide access to current technologies at reasonable cost without the risk of
obsolescence
Can reduce expenses by gaining capabilities without incurring overhead costs (for example,
staffing, benefits, space)
May improve the quality and/or timeliness of products or services
Limitations
Despite many attractive advantages, outsourcing is not the answer for all activities or functions and
should consider the following key cautions: May cost more to go outside for specific expertise
Theory of Constraints (TOC) Describes methods to maximize operating income when faced with
some bottleneck and some nonbottleneck operations.
Theory of Constraints (TOC) is a means of making decisions at the operational level that will Impact a
company's profitability positively. For a company to be competitive, it needs to be able to respond
quickly to customer orders. Theory of Constraints is an Important way for a company to speed up its
manufacturing time so it can improve its customer response time and its profitability
Manufacturing cycle time, also called manufacturing lead time or throughput time, is defined as
the amount of time between the receipt of a customer order the shipment of the order.
Duration between the time an order is received by manufacturing to the time it becomes a
finished good.
Inventory
Inventory refers to all the money the system invests in purchasing items it intends to resell. Typically,
this refers to all physical inventory items but is now more broadly defined to include all assets.
Operating Expenses
In the TOC, operating (or operational) expenses refer to the money the system spends to convert
inventory into throughput. Operating expenses include expenditures such as direct and indirect labor,
supplies, outside contractors, interest payments, and depreciation. Employees are responsible for
turning inventory into throughput.
Throughput Contribution
Throughput contribution, also known as throughput margin or simply throughput, is a TOC measure
of product profitability. It is the rate at which the entire system generates money through product
and/or service sales.
Throughput contribution is represented by the following formula:
Throughput contribution assumes that the material costs include all purchased components and
material handling costs. TOC analysis also assumes that labor is a fixed cost, not a direct and
variable cost. The relationship between TOC and throughput contribution is explained in further detail
later in this section. Direct labor and other manufacturing costs such as overhead are excluded,
because it is assumed they will not change in the short term.
Drum-Buffer-Rope System
The drum-buffer-rope (PBR) system is a TOC method for balancing the flow of production through the
constraint thereby reducing the amount of inventory at the constraint and improving overall
productivity .
The drum connotes the constraint, the rope is the sequence of processes prior to and including the
constraint, and the buffer is the minimum amount of work-in-process input needed to keep the drum
busy.
The objective of the drum-buffer-rope system is to keep the process flow running smoothly through
the constraint by careful timing and scheduling of the processes in the rope leading up to the
constraint.
Prepared by: Sameh.Y.El-lithy. CMA,CIA. 5
Theory of constraints (TOC) analysis describes three basic measurements: throughput contribution (sales – direct materials), investments
(raw materials; work-in-process; finished goods; R&D costs; and property, plant, and equipment), and operating costs (all costs except
direct materials).
Throughput margin
A TOC measure of product profitability; it equals price less materials cost, including all purchased
components and materials handling costs
The constraint in a system is determined by the step that has the smallest capacity
maximizing the contribution margin through the constraint called the throughput margin or throughput
contribution
Throughput costing
Companies involved in TOC use a form of variable costing(Throughput costing, sometimes called
supervariable costing). However, one difference of the TOC approach is that it treats direct labor as a
fixed cost for three reasons:
Many companies have a commitment to guarantee
workers a minimum number of paid hours.
Direct labor is usually not the constraint.
TOC emphasizes the role direct laborers play in driving continuous improvement. Since
layoffs often devastate morale, managers involved in TOC are extremely reluctant to lay off
employees.
Throughput costing, sometimes called supervariable costing recognizes only direct materials costs as
being truly variable and thus relevant to the calculation of throughput margin. All other manufacturing
costs are ignored because they are considered fixed in the short run.
Throughput costing puts a penalty on production without a corresponding sale in the same period.
Costs other than direct materials that are variable with respect to production are expensed in the
period of incurrence, whereas under variable costing they would be capitalized. As a result,
Prepared by: Sameh.Y.El-lithy. CMA,CIA. 6
throughput costing provides less incentive to
produce for inventory than either variable costing or absorption costing.
Advocates of throughput costing maintain that, in the short run, manufacturing costs other than direct
materials are relatively fixed. They view costs relating to workers, equipment, occupancy, and so on
as relatively fixed with respect to providing productive capacity during the period.
5.Redesign the manufacturing process for greater flexibility and fast cycle time.
Value engineering is useful for this purpose because it explicitly balances product cost and
the needs of potential customers (product functions).
TOC ABC
Main Short-term focus: through put margin Long-term focus; analysis
Objective analysis based on materials and materials- of all product costs,
related costs concerned with strategic
pricing and profit planning
Resource Included explicitly, a principal focus of Not included explicitly
constraints TOC
Cost drivers No direct utilization of cost drivers Develop an understanding
of cost drivers at all levels
Major Use Optimization of production flow and short- Strategic pricing and profit
term product mix planning
Theoretical or Ideal (perfect ) capacity - This is the level of activity that will occur IF the company
produces at Its absolute most efficient level at all times(under ideal conditions). (This means no
allowances for idle time and downtime and no machine breakdowns or maintenance, delays and no
decrease in sales demand and no waste and no time lost to illness and that the workers are already
working at maximum efficiency.). This is not a good basis to use because a company will not be able
to achieve this level in the long run. Theoretical capacity represents the largest volume of output
possible, but is unattainable and unrealistic.
Using theoretical capacity when calculating overhead allocations would mean that a large
denominator activity level would be used, resulting in a lower overhead allocation to individual units of
product. This would distort the allocated costs (making them too low) and provide management with
product cost information that is not representative of actual costs.
Practical (or currently attainable) capacity - This is the theoretical level reduced by allowances
For idle time and downtime, but not For a decrease in sales demand. Thus it represents the highest
level of capacity that can be achieved, while allowing for unavoidable losses of productive time, such
as machine breakdowns, employee vacations, maintenance, etc. Unlike theoretical capacity, it is the
level of capacity that can realistically be achieved.
Normal capacity utilization - This is the level of activity that will be achieved in the long run, taking
into account seasonal changes in the business and cyclical changes. Seasonal changes in business
result From the seasons during the year and cyclical changes are connected to the larger business
cycle. Normal capacity utilization is the level of activity that will satisfy average customer demand
over a long-term period such as 2-3 years. Though this will cause inaccuracies in some years, they
will be offset in others. This is the method that a company should generally use to determine the
overhead standard cost.
Usually normal capacity or expected actual capacity (also called master budget capacity) is used as
the denominator in calculating the overhead standard rate. It is much simpler if the activity level used
in developing the overhead standard is the same activity level as is used in developing the budgeted
overhead costs. If it is not, differences between budgeted costs and standard costs due to the:
different activity levels will appear in variance reports as additional variances.
Overhead is allocated based on machine hours. So we need to convert that to a rate per machine
hour. The standard number of machine hours for each unit produced is 1.5 machine hours, so total
machine hours budgeted for the year is 500,000 * 1.5, or 750,000. Therefore, the amount of overhead
to be budgeted for each machine hour allowed For the budgeted output is $ 1.20 ($1.80 per unit ÷ 1.5
machine hours per unit OR $900,000 ÷ 750,000 machine hours).
Production is not planned to take place evenly throughout the year. The production budget For the
first quarter calls for 40,000 units to be produced in January, 50,000 in February, and 45,000 in
March. Therefore, budgeted overhead will be (40,000 K $1.80) or $72,000 in January, (50,000 X
$1.80) or $90,000 in February, and (45,000 X $1.80) or $81,000 in March.
We can calculate the same amounts by using machine hours: January's budgeted machine hours is
40,000 production units X 1.5 machine hours per unit, or 60,000 machine hours. 60,000 machine
hours x $1.20 per machine hour = $72,000 budgeted overhead for January, and so forth for February
and March.
At the end of the year, the total budgeted overhead for the year should equal $900,000. We will have
allocated it unequally to each month in the year, based upon each month's budgeted output.
Value chain
The sequence of business functions in which usefulness is added to the products of services of a
company.
Value-chain analysis
A strategic analysis tool used to
identify where value to customers can be increased or costs reduced, and
to better understand the firm's linkages with suppliers, customers, and other firms in the
industry.
o Because the value chain identifies and connects the organization's strategic
activities, value chain analysis improves the firm's knowledge of its relations with
customers; suppliers, and competitors.
It also facilitates the strategic determination of the phase(s) of the industry's Value chain in
which the firm should operate.
to focus on those activities that are consistent with its overall strategy.
help an organization gain competitive advantage by identifying what steps or activities do
and do not increase the value to the customers.
o Once those areas are identified, the organization can increase the related benefits,
or reduce (even eliminate) non value-added activities. The increase in value to the
customer and/or the decrease in production costs will make the company more
competitive. The firm should analyze each step in its operations carefully to
determine how each activity contributes to the company's profits and its
competitiveness.
2) Identify the cost driver or cost drivers for each activity, and
3) Develop a competitive advantage by adding value to the customer or reducing the costs of
the activity.
For example,
R&D can add value to established products or services by finding ways to improve them,
in addition to developing new ones.
Production's function is to acquire the necessary raw materials and assemble them into
finished goods. By doing this efficiently, costs can be lowered, leading to higher profits.
Marketing adds value by informing customers about the products or services, which may
increase the utility that customers attribute to the product or service and enable the
company to charge a higher price. Marketing can also discover what customers want and
need through marketing research and communicate that to the R&D group so the R&D
group can design products that match the customers' needs.
Customer service after the sale adds value by delighting customers with the responsive
service received, thus creating superior value for them. Increased utility for customers
because of excellent customer service can also enable the company to charge more for its
products.
Value chain and supply chain analysis performed by the management accounting function can
contribute to the achievement of key success factors. When each business function adds value and
all business functions are coordinated and well integrated, it contributes to cost control, high quality,
timely response, and innovation.
Value engineering is a systematic evaluation of all aspects of the value-chain business functions,
with the objective of reducing costs while satisfying customer needs. Value engineering via
improvement in product and process designs is a principal technique that companies use to achieve
target costs per unit.
Definition
High-value-added activity
A high-value-added activity increases significantly the value of the product or service to the
customers. Removal of a high-value-added activity decreases perceptively the value of the product or
service to the customer. Such an activity may be mandated (e.g., a regulatory requirement) or
discretionary.
Examples : Inserting a flange into a part, pouring molten metal into a mold, and preparing a field for
planting are examples of high-value-added activities. Installing software to protect a computer from
spam is a high-value-added activity to customers annoyed by bombardments of unwanted e-mail.
Designing, processing, and delivering products and services are high-value-added activities.
Value-added cost A value-added cost is incurred to perform a value-added activity without waste. It
is a cost that customers perceive as adding value, or utility, to a product or service. Examples are
costs of materials, direct labor, tools, and machinery.
Low-value-added activity
A low-value-added activity consumes time, resources, or space, but adds little in satisfying
customer needs. If eliminated, customer value or satisfaction decreases inperceptively or remains
unchanged. Moving parts between processes, waiting time, repairing, and rework are examples of
low-value-added activities.
Examples
Value-added costs: Materials and labor for regular repairs
Nonvalue-added costs: Rework costs, expediting costs caused by work delays, breakdown
maintenance of equipment
Gray area: Materials handling costs, Materials procurement and inspection costs, Preventive
maintenance of equipment
Classifications of value-added, nonvalue-added, and gray area costs are often not clear-cut.
Other classifications of some of the cost categories are also plausible. For example, some students
may include materials handling, materials procurement, and inspection costs and preventive
maintenance as value-added costs (costs that customers perceive as adding value and as being
necessary for good repair service) rather than as in the gray area. Preventive maintenance, for
instance, might be regarded as value-added because it helps prevent nonvalueadding breakdown
maintenance.
The selection of value-added activities in each place of the value chain reflects the firm's
determination of its competitive advantage and its choice of competitive strategy. For example,
different design strategies require different activities and costs. A firm might choose to be the low-cost
producer of an undifferentiated product rather than compete on the basis of superior product quality.
Definition
Management decisions and activity analysis that use activity-based costing information to satisfy
customers and improve operational control, management control and profitability.
ABM applications can be classified into two categories: operational ABM and strategic
ABM.
o Operational ABM enhances operation efficiency and asset utilization and lowers costs; its
focuses are on doing things right and performing activities more efficiently.
o Operational ABM applications use management techniques such as activity
management, business process reengineering, total quality management, and
performance measurement.
o Strategic ABM attempts to alter the demand for activities and increase profitability through
improved activity efficiency.
o Strategic ABM focuses on choosing appropriate activities for the operation, eliminating
nonessential activities and selecting the most profitable customers. Strategic ABM
applications use management techniques such as process design, customer
profitability analysis, and value chain analysis.
Definition
Process
A process is how something is accomplished in a firm. It is a set of activities directed toward the
same objective. A process is an activity or a group of interrelated activities that takes an input of
materials and/or resources, adds value to it, and provides an output to internal or external customers.
Reengineering
Is process innovation and core process redesign. Instead of improving existing procedures, it finds
new ways of doing things. Thus, reengineering should be contrasted with process improvement.
Process improvement
Consists of incremental but constant changes that improve efficiency.
Process reengineering
Process reengineering diagrams a process in detail, evaluates and questions the process [low, and
then completely redesigns the process to eliminate unnecessary steps, reduce opportunities for
errors, and reduce costs. All activities that do not add value are eliminated.
Process analysis
a collection of analytic methods that can be used to examine and measure the basic elements for a
process to operate. It can also identify those processes with the greatest need for improvement.
Process analysis looks at the linkage of quality, productivity, and process improvements:
• Productivity implies trying to improve upon what already exists.
• Improving productivity requires continuous quality improvement.
• Continuous improvement necessitates ongoing organizational learning, process improvements, and
reengineering.
These continuous productivity improvements, then can help an organization be competitive in the
long term.
Accordingly, BPR techniques eliminate many traditional controls. They exploit modern technology to
improve productivity and decrease the number of clerical workers. Thus, the emphasis is on
developing controls that are automated and self-correcting and require minimal human intervention.
The emphasis therefore shifts to monitoring internal control so management can determine when an
operation may be out of control and corrective action is needed. Most BPR techniques also assume
that humans will be motivated to work actively in improving operations when they are full participants
in the process.
Monitoring-assesses the quality of internal control over time. Management considers whether internal
control is properly designed and operating as intended and modifies it to reflect changing conditions,
Monitoring may be in the form of separate, periodic evaluations or of ongoing monitoring. Ongoing
monitoring occurs as part of routine operations. It includes management and supervisory review,
comparisons, reconciliations, and other actions by personnel as part of their regular activities.
Benchmarking is an ongoing process that entails quantitative and qualitative measurement of the
difference between the company's performance of an activity and the performance by the best in the
world. The benchmark organization need not be a competitor.
Mechanism
It analyzes and measures the key outputs of a business process or function against the best and also
identifies the underlying key actions and root causes that contribute to the performance difference.
Many people think of benchmarking as simply capturing best-in-class information, but the practice
has a much wider application. Quite often, best-in-class levels are comparisons to external
benchmarks of industry leaders. However, they may also be based on internal benchmarking
information or measures from other organizations (outside an industry) that have similar processes.
Benchmarking phases
1) Select and prioritize benchmarking projects.
2) The next phase is to organize benchmarking (cross functional) teams.
3) Documenting own work process: determining relevant benchmarking measurements
3) Researching and identifying best-in-class performance
4) Analyzing benchmarking data: The data analysis phase entails identifying performance gaps,
understanding the reasons they exist; and prioritizing the key activities that will facilitate the
behavioral and process changes needed to implement the benchmarking study's recommendations.
5) The implementation phase (Leadership is most important).
Through benchmarking, a firm identifies best-in-class levels and conducts a study to determine how
those levels can be adopted and lead to improved performance. It provides a rational method for
setting performance goals and gaining market leadership; important decisions are based on facts and
data, rather than on emotions. Because benchmarking is based on what the best are doing, it
provides an accurate assessment of what needs to change.
Best practice analysis involves assessing how a firm’s given performance level measures up to a
best practice and then defining the logical next steps in transitioning to the desired performance level.
Typical activities are:
o Defining the gap (through a comparison to internal operational data)
o Determining the reasons for the gap
o Examining the factors that contribute to the existence of the best practice(s)
o Developing recommendations and an approach to implement the best practice(s)
Techniques and tools for conducting a best practice analysis vary. Qualitative and quantitative tools
are used but most of the tools are common to total quality management and kaizen.
It may be said that best practice analysis tools—such as value chain analysis, process analysis,
business process reengineering, benchmarking, total quality management, and kaizen---are the clout
behind business process improvement initiatives. Best practice analysis enables firms to identify and
undertake performance improvements.
SMA 4R lists four categories of costs of quality: prevention, appraisal, internal failure, and external
failure. An organization should attempt to minimize its total cost of quality.
a. Conformance costs include prevention and appraisal, which are both financial measures of
internal performance.
1) Prevention attempts to avoid defective output. These costs include preventive maintenance,
employee training, review of equipment design, and evaluation of suppliers.
o Prevention costs are the costs of quality system design, implementation, and maintenance,
including audits of the quality system itself. Examples include quality planning, review of new
products, surveys of supplier capabilities, team meetings for quality, and training for quality,
as well as related to ensuring the quality or quality improvement of the product: market
research, product testing, and product design.
2) Appraisal embraces such activities as statistical quality control programs, inspection, and testing.
o Appraisal costs are the costs of auditing processes for quality, including formal and informal
measurements and evaluations of quality levels and setting quality standards and
performance requirements. Examples include inspection and testing of raw materials, work-in-
process and finished goods testing, calibration of equipment, and audits or operations or
services. In addition, they address more externally focused costs such as monitoring market
reaction and competitors’ products.
2) The costs of external failure or lost opportunity include lost profits from a decline in market
share as dissatisfied customers make no repeat purchases, return products for refunds, cancel
orders, and communicate their dissatisfaction to others.
a) Thus, external failure costs are incurred for customer service complaints; rejection, return, repair,
or recall of products or services; warranty obligations; products liability claims; and customer losses.
b) Environmental costs are also external failure costs, e.g., fines for nonadherence to
environmental law and loss of customer goodwill.
External failure costs are the costs involved with shipping a defective product to a
customer. Examples include customer complaints, returns, product recalls, and warranty claims.
Overall, these costs relate to an inability to meet customer
perceptions for product quality and service.
i) To minimize environmental damage and its resulting costs, the International Organization for
Standardization has issued ISO 14000 standards to promote the reduction of environmental damage
by an organization’s products, services, and operations and to develop environmental auditing and
performance evaluation systems.
Kaizen also has something to say about standards in manufacturing. If you recall, we said that standard costs
may be either Ideal standards, attainable only under the best possible conditions, or practical, expected
costs, which are challenging to attain, but attainable under normal conditions. Toyota, the company most
recognized for its use of kaizen, would say that standards are temporary and not absolutes. Improvement is
always possible, and the goal is to attain the ideal standard. Even though practical standards are being
attained, the ultimate goal is still not being achieved.
Ideal standards have been adopted by some companies that apply continuous improvement
and other total quality management principles.
A company may use target costing along with kaizen principles to determine what its ideal standard costs are.
This puts the focus on the market because it starts with a target price based on the market price. The market
determines the target price, and the company must attain the target cost in order to realize its desired profit
margin for the product. The Ideal standard is thus defined as the target cost, or the standard cost that will
enable the company to attain its desired cost and desired profit margin. Using Kaizen principles, the company
figures out how it can manufacture the product for the target cost. The standard is achieved through
development of new manufacturing methods and techniques that entail continuous improvement Or the ongoing
search for new ways to reduce costs.
Implementing ideal standards and quality improvements is the heart of the kaizen concept. Kaizen challenges
people to imagine the ideal condition and strive to make the necessary improvements to achieve that ideal.