Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 589 views

    Case #/ Name G.R. No. L-33628 December 29, 1987 Parties Ebarle vs. Sucaldito Topic/Point of Discussion Facts

    Uploaded by

    ann laguardia
    1) Petitioner Bienvenido Ebarle, the provincial Governor of Zamboanga, was accused of various graft violations related to government contracts awarded to his relatives' companies. 2) Ebarle claimed the criminal complaints against him did not follow the procedures outlined in Executive Order 264 for administrative charges. 3) However, the Supreme Court dismissed the petition, finding that EO 264 applies exclusively to administrative charges, not criminal complaints, as the language refers to "irregularities" rather than criminal offenses.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Case #/ Name G.R. No. L-33628 December 29, 1987 Parties Ebarle vs. Sucaldito Topic/Point of Discussion Facts

    Uploaded by

    ann laguardia
    589 views1 page
    1) Petitioner Bienvenido Ebarle, the provincial Governor of Zamboanga, was accused of various graft violations related to government contracts awarded to his relatives' companies. 2) Ebarle claimed the criminal complaints against him did not follow the procedures outlined in Executive Order 264 for administrative charges. 3) However, the Supreme Court dismissed the petition, finding that EO 264 applies exclusively to administrative charges, not criminal complaints, as the language refers to "irregularities" rather than criminal offenses.

    Original Title

    ebarle vs sucaldito.docx

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    1) Petitioner Bienvenido Ebarle, the provincial Governor of Zamboanga, was accused of various graft violations related to government contracts awarded to his relatives' companies. 2) Ebarle claimed the criminal complaints against him did not follow the procedures outlined in Executive Order 264 for administrative charges. 3) However, the Supreme Court dismissed the petition, finding that EO 264 applies exclusively to administrative charges, not criminal complaints, as the language refers to "irregularities" rather than criminal offenses.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    589 views1 page

    Case #/ Name G.R. No. L-33628 December 29, 1987 Parties Ebarle vs. Sucaldito Topic/Point of Discussion Facts

    Uploaded by

    ann laguardia
    1) Petitioner Bienvenido Ebarle, the provincial Governor of Zamboanga, was accused of various graft violations related to government contracts awarded to his relatives' companies. 2) Ebarle claimed the criminal complaints against him did not follow the procedures outlined in Executive Order 264 for administrative charges. 3) However, the Supreme Court dismissed the petition, finding that EO 264 applies exclusively to administrative charges, not criminal complaints, as the language refers to "irregularities" rather than criminal offenses.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    You are on page 1of 1

    Case #/ Name G.R. No.

    L-33628 December 29, 1987

    Parties Ebarle vs. Sucaldito

    Topic/Point of Discussion Title


    Facts
     Petitioner Bienvenido Ebarle was then provincial Governor of Zamboanga and a candidate for re-
    election in the 1971 local elections
     Anti-Graft League of the Phils. filed different complainst with the City Fiscal against the
    petitioner for violations of provisions of the Anti-Graft Law (RA 3019) as well as Arts. 171, 182,
    183, 213 & 318 of the Revised Penal Code
    o on the bidding for the supply of gravel and sand for the province of Zamboanga del Sur
    in favour of Tabiliran Trucking Company
    o on the collection of advances under the trucking contract of Tabiliran Trucking
    Company, making it appear that it was collected by Teoson Trucking Company, who
    held the subsisting contract
    o on the bidding for the construction of the right wing portion of the Capitol Building of
    the Province of Zamboanga del Sur, in favour of supposed winning bidder who is the
    brother-in-law of Ebarle
    o on petitioner’s testifying falsely under oath that he acquired a certain lot by purchase
    but the lot was in fact owned by the provincial government of Zamboanga del Sur
    (where the provincial jail is located)
    o on the simulated bidding in favour of Tabiliran Trucking Company
    o on appointments of people related to Ebarle to different positions in the government
     petitioner filed for prohibition and certiorari in the Court of First Instance of Zamboanga del Sur
    but the case was dismissed
     in the petition filed before the SC, petitioner claims that the respondents City Fiscal and the Anti-
    Graft League failed to comply with the provisions of EO 264 preliminary to their criminal
    recourses
    o OUTLINING THE PROCEDURE BY WHICH COMPLAINANTS CHARGING THE GOV’T
    OFFICIALS AND EPLOYEES WITH THE COMMISSION OF IRREGULARITIES SHOULD BE
    GUIDED
     petitioner assails the standing of respondent Anti-Graft League to commence the series of
    prosecutions
     petitioner contends that the respondent Fiscal (in G.R. No. 34162) in giving due course to the
    complaints notwithstanding the order the SC had issued (in G. R. 33628) which he claims
    applies as well thereto, committed a grave abuse of discretion
     petitioner claims that the prosecutions were politically motivated, initiated by his rivals

    Issue Whether or not EO 264 is exclusively applicable to administrative charges and not to criminal complaints

    Held/Ruling
    Petition dismissed.

    Ratio: The title of the EO 264 is of “Commission of Irregularities”. It speaks of commission of irregularities
    and not criminal offenses. Had the order intended to make it applicable thereto, it could have been
    referred to the more specific terms like “accused,” “convicted,” and the like.

    Executive Order No. 264, "OUTLINING THE PROCEDUE BY WHICH COMPLAINANTS CHARGING
    Supplemental Notes GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS AND EMPLOYEES WITH COMMISSION OF IRREGULARITIES SHOULD BE GUIDED,"

    You might also like

    pFad - Phonifier reborn

    Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

    Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


    Alternative Proxies:

    Alternative Proxy

    pFad Proxy

    pFad v3 Proxy

    pFad v4 Proxy