Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 44 views

    C3c - 3 - Alvarez v. Ramirez

    Uploaded by

    Aaron Ariston
    This document summarizes a Philippine Supreme Court case from 2005 about whether a wife could testify against her estranged husband in a criminal arson case. The wife, Esperanza Alvarez, was called as the first witness against her estranged husband Maximo Alvarez, who filed a motion to disqualify her testimony based on marital privilege. The trial court initially disqualified the wife's testimony but an appeals court overturned this. The Supreme Court then ruled that the wife could testify over her husband's objection, as their marital relations were so strained due to the estrangement that the privilege no longer applied. The state also has an interest in punishing criminals and exonerating the innocent.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    C3c - 3 - Alvarez v. Ramirez

    Uploaded by

    Aaron Ariston
    44 views1 page
    This document summarizes a Philippine Supreme Court case from 2005 about whether a wife could testify against her estranged husband in a criminal arson case. The wife, Esperanza Alvarez, was called as the first witness against her estranged husband Maximo Alvarez, who filed a motion to disqualify her testimony based on marital privilege. The trial court initially disqualified the wife's testimony but an appeals court overturned this. The Supreme Court then ruled that the wife could testify over her husband's objection, as their marital relations were so strained due to the estrangement that the privilege no longer applied. The state also has an interest in punishing criminals and exonerating the innocent.

    Original Description:

    Evidence

    Original Title

    C3c- 3 - Alvarez v. Ramirez

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document summarizes a Philippine Supreme Court case from 2005 about whether a wife could testify against her estranged husband in a criminal arson case. The wife, Esperanza Alvarez, was called as the first witness against her estranged husband Maximo Alvarez, who filed a motion to disqualify her testimony based on marital privilege. The trial court initially disqualified the wife's testimony but an appeals court overturned this. The Supreme Court then ruled that the wife could testify over her husband's objection, as their marital relations were so strained due to the estrangement that the privilege no longer applied. The state also has an interest in punishing criminals and exonerating the innocent.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    44 views1 page

    C3c - 3 - Alvarez v. Ramirez

    Uploaded by

    Aaron Ariston
    This document summarizes a Philippine Supreme Court case from 2005 about whether a wife could testify against her estranged husband in a criminal arson case. The wife, Esperanza Alvarez, was called as the first witness against her estranged husband Maximo Alvarez, who filed a motion to disqualify her testimony based on marital privilege. The trial court initially disqualified the wife's testimony but an appeals court overturned this. The Supreme Court then ruled that the wife could testify over her husband's objection, as their marital relations were so strained due to the estrangement that the privilege no longer applied. The state also has an interest in punishing criminals and exonerating the innocent.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 1

    C3c- 3 Marital Disqualification

    Alvarez v. Ramirez
    GR No.143439
    October 14, 2005

    Sandoval-Gutierrez, j.:

    FACTS:
    Respondent Susan Ramirez (Ramirez) was the complaining witness in a criminal case or
    arson pending before the RTC. The accused was petitioner Maximo Alvarez (Alvarez), estranged
    husband of Esperanza Alvarez (Esperanza), sister of respondent. On June 21, 1999, Esperanza
    Alvarez was called to the witness stand as the first witness against petitioner, her husband.
    Petitioner filed a motion to disqualify Esperanza from testifying against him pursuant to Rule 130 of
    the Revised Rules of Court on marital disqualification.

    Respondent filed an opposition to the motion. Pending resolution of the motion, the trial court
    directed the prosecution to proceed with the presentation of the other witnesses. On September
    2, 1999, the trial court issued the questioned Order disqualifying Esperanza Alvarez from further
    testifying and deleting her testimony from the records. The prosecution filed a motion for
    reconsideration but was denied in the other assailed Order dated October 19, 1999. This prompted
    respondent to file with the Court of Appeals a petition for certiorari with application for preliminary
    injunction and temporary restraining order. On May 31, 2000, the Appellate Court rendered a
    Decision nullifying and setting aside the assailed Orders issued by the trial court. Hence, this petition
    for review on certiorari.

    ISSUE:
    Whether or not Esperanza can testify over the objection of her estranged husband on the
    ground of marital privilege.

    HELD:
    Yes, Esperanza may testify over the objection of her husband. The disqualification of a
    witness by reason of marriage under Sec. 22, Rule 130 of the Revised Rules of Court has its
    exceptions as where the marital relations are so strained that there is no more harmony to be
    preserved. The acts of the petitioner stamp out all major aspects of marital life. On the other hand,
    the State has an interest in punishing the guilty and exonerating the innocent, and must have the
    right to offer the testimony of Esperanza over the objection of her husband.

    NOTE:
    Sec. 22. Disqualification by reason of marriage. During their marriage, neither the husband
    nor the wife may testify for or against the other without the consent of the affected spouse, except
    in a civil case by one against the other, or in a criminal case for a crime committed by one against
    the other or the latters direct descendants or ascendants.

    You might also like

    pFad - Phonifier reborn

    Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

    Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


    Alternative Proxies:

    Alternative Proxy

    pFad Proxy

    pFad v3 Proxy

    pFad v4 Proxy