Crim QQR
Crim QQR
Crim QQR
CRIMINAL LAW
Page 2 of 88
2018 Bar Examinations CRIMINAL LAW
Page 3 of 88
2018 Bar Examinations CRIMINAL LAW
5. As to count
a. Compound
b. Composite or special complex
c. Complex, under Art. 48 of the RPC
d. Continued
e. Continuing
6. As to division
a. Formal felonies – those which are always
consummated (e.g. physical injuries).
b. Material felonies – those which have various
stages of execution.
c. Those which do not admit of the frustrated stage
b) Elements of criminal liability
Criminal liability is incurred by any person:
Committing a felony although the wrongful act done
be different from that which he intended;
Requisites:
1. That an intentional felony has been
committed; and 2. That the wrong done to the aggrieved
party be the direct, natural and logical consequence of the
felony committed by the offender
c) Impossible crime - Performing an act which would be an
offense against persons or property, were it not for the
inherent impossibility of its accomplishment or on account
of the employment of inadequate or ineffectual means
Requisites
1. Act performed would be an offense against persons or
property;
NOTE: Kidnapping is a crime against personal security and
not against person or property, thus there can be no
impossible crime of kidnapping
2. Act was done with evil intent;
3. Accomplishment is inherently impossible or means
employed is either inadequate or ineffectual; and
4. Act performed should not constitute a violation of another
provision of RPC
d) Stages of execution
1. Internal Acts– mere ideas in the mind of a person, not
punishable even if, had they been carried out, they would
constitute a crime
2. External Acts – include (a) preparatory acts and (b) acts
of execution
a. Preparatory acts–those that do not have a direct
connection with the crime which the offender intends to
commit.
These are ordinarily not punishable except when expressly
provided for or when they are considered in themselves as
independent crimes. (e.g. Possession of picklocks under
Page 4 of 88
2018 Bar Examinations CRIMINAL LAW
Page 5 of 88
2018 Bar Examinations CRIMINAL LAW
a) Justifying circumstances
1. Self-defense;
Requisites:
1. Unlawful aggression;
2. Reasonable necessity of the means employed to
prevent or repel it; and
3. Lack of sufficient provocation on the part of the
person defending himself.
2. Defense of relatives;
1. Unlawful aggression;
2. Reasonable necessity of the means employed to
prevent or repel it; and
(3) In case person attacked provoked attacker
defender must have no part therein
3. Defense of stranger;
(1) Unlawful aggression;
(2) Reasonable necessity of the means employed to
prevent or repel it;
(3) The person defending be not induced by
revenge, resentment or other evil motive.
4. Avoidance of greater evil or injury;
Requisites:
(1) Evil sought to be avoided actually exists
(2) Injury feared be greater than that done to avoid it
(3) There is no other practical & less harmful means
of preventing it
5. Fulfillment of duty or exercise of right or office;
Requisites:
(1) Offender acted in performance of duty or lawful
exercise of a right/office
(2) The resulting felony is the unavoidable
consequence of the due fulfillment of the duty or the lawful
exercise of the right or office.
6. Obedience to an order of a superior.
Requisites:
(1) Order must have been issued by a superior
Page 6 of 88
2018 Bar Examinations CRIMINAL LAW
Page 7 of 88
2018 Bar Examinations CRIMINAL LAW
(3) Defense of strangers (Art. 11, par. 3)- same with self
defense
(4) State of necessity or avoidance of greater evil or injury
(Art. 11, par. 4)
That the evil sought to be avoided actually exists is an
indispensable element to apply
(5) Performance of duty (Art. 11, par. 5)
(6) Obedience to the order of superiors (Art. 11, par. 6)
(7) Minority over 15 years of age but below 18 years of age
(Art. 12, par. 3)
(8) Causing injury by mere accident (Art. 12, par.4)
NOTE: There is NO SUCH MITIGATING CIRCUMSTANCE
because:
If the 2nd requisite and 1st part of the 4th requisite are
absent, the case will fall under Art. 365 which punishes
reckless imprudence.
If the 1st requisite and 2nd part of the 4th requisite are
absent, it will be an intentional felony (Art. 4, par. 1).
(9) Uncontrollable fear (Art. 12 par. 6)
One of the element is missing, hence, mitigating
2. Under 18 or Over 70 years of age
Legal effects of various ages of offenders:
1. 15 and below - Exempting
2. Above 15 but under 18 years of age, also an
exempting circumstance, unless he acted with discernment
(Art. 12, par. 3 as amended by RA 9344).
3. Minor delinquent under 18 years of age, the
sentence may be suspended. (Art. 192, PD No. 603 as
amended by PD 1179)
4. 18 years or over, full criminal responsibility.
5. 70 years or over – mitigating, no imposition of
death penalty; if already imposed. Execution of death
penalty is suspended and commuted.
3. No intention to commit so grave a wrong
4. Sufficient Provocation or Threat
Elements:
(1) That the provocation must be sufficient
(2) That it must originate from the offended party
(3) That the provocation must be immediate to the
act, i.e., to the commission of the crime by the person who
is provoked
5. Immediate vindication of a grave offense
Elements:
(1) That there be a grave offense done to the one
committing the felony, his spouse, ascendants,
descendants, legitimate, natural or adopted brothers or
sisters, or relatives by affinity within the same degree.
Page 8 of 88
2018 Bar Examinations CRIMINAL LAW
Page 9 of 88
2018 Bar Examinations CRIMINAL LAW
Page 10 of 88
2018 Bar Examinations CRIMINAL LAW
Page 11 of 88
2018 Bar Examinations CRIMINAL LAW
Page 12 of 88
2018 Bar Examinations CRIMINAL LAW
Page 13 of 88
2018 Bar Examinations CRIMINAL LAW
2. PARDON
General rule: Pardon does not extinguish criminal action (Art
23).
Exception: Pardon by marriage between the accused and
the offended party in cases of SEDUCTION, ABDUCTION,
RAPE AND ACTS OF LASCIVIOUSNESS (Art 344).
3. OTHER ABSOLUTORY CAUSES
a. Spontaneous desistance
Page 14 of 88
2018 Bar Examinations CRIMINAL LAW
Page 15 of 88
2018 Bar Examinations CRIMINAL LAW
Page 16 of 88
2018 Bar Examinations CRIMINAL LAW
Page 17 of 88
2018 Bar Examinations CRIMINAL LAW
Page 18 of 88
2018 Bar Examinations CRIMINAL LAW
4. Destierro.
Light penalties:
1. Arresto menor,
2. Public censure. Penalties
common to the three preceding
classes: 3. Fine and Bond to
keep the peace.
According to Divisibility
Divisible - have fixed duration and are divisible into three periods.
Indivisible - no fixed duration (E.g. Death, reclusion perpetua,
perpetual absolute or special disqualification, public censure.)
According to subject-matter
1. Corporal (death)
2. Deprivation of freedom (reclusion, prision, arresto)
3. Restriction of freedom (destierro)
4. Deprivation of rights (disqualification and suspension)
5. Pecuniary (fine)
According to their gravity
1. Capital – death
2. Afflictive – reclusion perpetua to prision mayor
3. Correctional – prision correccional to destierro
4. Light – arresto menor
Penalties that can either be principal or accessory
1. Perpetual or temporary absolute disqualification
2. Perpetual or temporary special disqualification
3. Suspension
4. Duration and Effect
Penalty Duration
Reclusion perpetua 20 yrs. and 1 day to 40 yrs.
Reclusion temporal 12 yrs. and 1 day to 20 yrs.
Prision mayor and temporary 6 yrs. and 1 day to 12 yrs.,
disqualification except when disqualification is
accessory penalty, in which
case its duration is that of the
principal penalty
Prision correccional, 6 mos. and 1 day to 6 yrs.,
suspension, and destierro except when suspension is an
accessory penalty, in which
case its duration is that of the
principal penalty
Arresto mayor 1 mo. and 1 day to 6 mos.
Arresto menor 1 day to 30 days
Page 19 of 88
2018 Bar Examinations CRIMINAL LAW
Page 20 of 88
2018 Bar Examinations CRIMINAL LAW
Defendant may serve his sentence in his house when: 1. The penalty
is arresto menor;
2. It is conditioned with surveillance by an officer of the law;
3. Either: a. It is due to the health of the offender; b. Other reasons
satisfactory to the court.
Page 21 of 88
2018 Bar Examinations CRIMINAL LAW
Probation
It is a disposition under which a defendant, after conviction and
sentence, is released subject to conditions imposed by the court and
to the supervision of a probation officer.
GR: Only those whose penalty does not exceed six years of
imprisonment are qualified for probation, without regard to the nature
of the crime. Hence, if the penalty is six years and one day, he is no
longer qualified for probation.
Page 22 of 88
2018 Bar Examinations CRIMINAL LAW
Page 23 of 88
2018 Bar Examinations CRIMINAL LAW
Page 24 of 88
2018 Bar Examinations CRIMINAL LAW
Page 25 of 88
2018 Bar Examinations CRIMINAL LAW
Piracy Mutiny
Offenders are strangers to the Offenders are members of the
vessel. Hence, offenders are neither complement or the passengers of
passengers nor crew members. the vessel.
Done with animo furandi/intent to Against the authority of the
stealand with the intention of commander of the ship.
universal hostility.
Intent to gain is an element of piracy. Intent to gain is immaterial
Attack from the outside. Attack from the inside.
Page 26 of 88
2018 Bar Examinations CRIMINAL LAW
Page 27 of 88
2018 Bar Examinations CRIMINAL LAW
Page 28 of 88
2018 Bar Examinations CRIMINAL LAW
Page 30 of 88
2018 Bar Examinations CRIMINAL LAW
Page 31 of 88
2018 Bar Examinations CRIMINAL LAW
Page 32 of 88
2018 Bar Examinations CRIMINAL LAW
Requisites
1. Coin mutilated is of legal tender; and
NOTE: This is the only article that requires that the mutilated coin be legal
tender.
2. Offender gains from the precious metal dust abstracted from the coin.
5. SELLING OF FALSE OR MUTILATED COIN, WITHOUT CONNIVANCE
ART. 165
Punishable Acts
1. Possession of coin, counterfeited or mutilated by another person, with
intent to utter the same, knowing that it is false or mutilated.
Elements: a. Possession (includes constructive possession); b. With intent to
utter; and c. Knowledge.
NOTE: Possession of or uttering false coin does not require that the
counterfeiting coin is legal tender. The possessor should not be the
counterfeiter, mutilator, or importer of the coins.
2. Actually uttering such false or mutilated coin, knowing the same to be false
or mutilated.
Elements: a. Actually uttering a false or mutilated coin; and b. Knowledge that
such coin is false or mutilated.
Page 34 of 88
2018 Bar Examinations CRIMINAL LAW
Page 35 of 88
2018 Bar Examinations CRIMINAL LAW
NOTE: The perversion of truth in the narration of facts must be made with the
wrongful intent of injuring a third person.
iv. The untruthful narration must be such as to affect the
integrity of the document or to change the effects which it would otherwise
produce.
e. Altering true dates. There is falsification under this paragraph
only when the date mentioned in the document is essential. The alteration of
the date in a document must affect either the veracity of the document of the
effects thereof.
f. Making any alteration or intercalation in a genuine document
which changes its meaning.
Elements:
i. That there be an alteration (change) or intercalation
(insertion) on a document;
ii. That it was made on a genuine document;
iii. That the alteration or intercalation had changed the
meaning of the document; and
iv. That the change made the document speak something
false. The alteration which makes a document speak the truth does not
constitute falsification.
g. Issuing in authenticated form a document purporting to be a copy
of an original document when no such original exists, or including in such
copy a statement contrary to, or different from, that of the genuine original.
NOTE: The acts of falsification mentioned in this paragraph cannot be
committed by a private individual or by a notary public or a public officer who
does not take advantage of his official position.
h. Intercalating any instrument or note relative to the issuance
thereof in a protocol, registry or official book.
4. In case the offender is an ecclesiastical minister, the act of falsification is
committed with respect to any record or document of such character that its
falsification may affect the civil status of persons.
12. Falsification by private individuals (Art. 172, RPC);
Punishable Acts
1. Falsification of public official or commercial document by a private
individual.
Elements:
a. Offender is a private individual or public officer or employee who
did not take advantage of his official position; b. He committed any
act of falsification; and
c. The falsification is committed in a public, official, or commercial
document or letter of exchange. Under this par., damage is not essential. It is
presumed.
2. Falsification of private document by any person
Elements:
a. Offender committed any of the acts of falsification except Art. 171
(7), that is, issuing in an authenticated form a document purporting to be a
copy of an original document when no such original exists, or including in
such a copy a statement contrary to, or different from that of the genuine
original;
b. Falsification was committed in any private document; and
c. Falsification caused damage to a third party or at least the
falsification was committed with intent to cause such damage.
Page 36 of 88
2018 Bar Examinations CRIMINAL LAW
Mere falsification of private document is not enough, two things are required:
a. He must have counterfeited the false document. b. He must have
performed an independent act which operates to the prejudice of a third
person.
3. Use of falsified document.
Elements:
a. In introducing in a judicial proceeding
i. Offender knew that the document was falsified by
another person
ii. The falsified document is in Arts. 171 or 172 (1 or
2)
iii. He introduced said document in evidence in a
judicial proceeding
Damage is not necessary in the crime of introducing in judicial proceeding a
false document.
b. In use in any other transaction –
i. Offender knew that a document was falsified by
another person
ii. The false document is embraced in Arts. 171 or
172 (1 or 2)
iii. He used such document
iv. The use caused damaged to another or at least
used with intent to cause damage
13. Falsification of wireless, cable, telegraph and telephone messages
(Art. 173, RPC);
Punishable Acts
1. Uttering fictitious wireless, telegraph or telephone message;
2. Falsifying wireless, telegraph or telephone message; and
Elements of par. 1 and 2:
a. That the offender is an officer or employee of the Government or
an officer or employee of a private corporation, engaged in the service of
sending or receiving wireless, cable or telephone message; and
b. That the offender commits any of the following acts:
i. Uttering fictitious wireless, cable, telegraph or telephone
message; or
ii. Falsifying wireless, cable, telegraph, or telephone
message.
3. Using such falsified message.
Elements:
a. Offender knew that wireless, cable, telegraph, or telephone
message was falsified by an officer or employee of a private corporation,
engaged in the service of sending or receiving wireless, cable or telephone
message;
b. He used such falsified dispatch; and
c. The use resulted in the prejudice of a third party or at least there
was intent to cause such prejudice.
14. Falsification of medical certificates, certificates of merit or service
(Art. 174, RPC);
Punishable Acts
Page 37 of 88
2018 Bar Examinations CRIMINAL LAW
Page 38 of 88
2018 Bar Examinations CRIMINAL LAW
Page 39 of 88
2018 Bar Examinations CRIMINAL LAW
d. Offender has the intent to cause the reduction of the price of the
thing auctioned.
26. Monopolies and Combinations in Restraint of Trade (Art. 186, RPC);
and
Art. 186 has been repealed by the Philippine Competition Act or RA 1066
27. Importation and Disposition of Falsely Marked Articles or
Merchandise Made of Gold, Silver, or other Precious Metals or their
Alloys (Art. 187, RPC).
Elements
1. Offender imports, sells, or disposes of any of those articles or merchandise;
2. Stamps, brands, or marks of those articles of merchandise fail to indicate
the actual fineness or quality of said metals or alloys; and
3. Offender knows that the stamps, brands or marks fail to indicate the actual
fineness or the quality of the metals or alloys.
F. Crimes against Public Morals
1. GRAVE SCANDAL ART. 200
Elements
1. Offender performs an act or acts; 2. Such act or acts be highly scandalous
as offending against decency or good customs; 3. Highly scandalous conduct
is not expressly falling within any other article of this Code; and 4. Act or acts
complained of be committed in a public place or within the public knowledge
or view.
2. IMMORAL DOCTRINES, OBSCENE PUBLICATIONS AND
EXHIBITIONS, AND INDECENT SHOWS ART. 201 AS AMENDED BY PD
969
Persons liable
1. Those who shall publicly expound or proclaim doctrines openly contrary to
public morals;
2. Authors of obscene literature, published with their knowledge in any form,
the editors publishing such literature; and the owners/operators of the
establishment selling the same;
3. Those who, in theaters, fairs, cinematographs, or any other place, exhibit
indecent or immoral plays, scenes, acts, or shows, it being understood that
the obscene literature or indecent or immoral plays, scenes, acts or shows,
whether live or in film, which are proscribed by virtue hereof, shall include
those which:
a. Glorify criminals or condone crimes;
b. Serve no other purpose but to satisfy the market for violence, lust
or pornography;
c. Offend any race, or religion;
d. Tend to abet traffic in and use of prohibited drugs;
e. Contrary to law, public order, morals, good customs, established
policies, lawful orders, decrees and edicts;
4. Those who shall sell, give away, or exhibit films, prints, engravings,
sculptures, or literatures which are offensive to morals.
3. VAGRANTS AND PROSTITUTES ART. 202, as amended by RA 10158
“An Act Decriminalizing Vagrancy”
The term is applicable only to a woman who, for money or profit, habitually
engages in sexual intercourse or lascivious conduct. A man who engages in
the same conduct is not a prostitute but a vagrant.
Page 40 of 88
2018 Bar Examinations CRIMINAL LAW
Page 41 of 88
2018 Bar Examinations CRIMINAL LAW
Page 42 of 88
2018 Bar Examinations CRIMINAL LAW
Page 45 of 88
2018 Bar Examinations CRIMINAL LAW
Page 46 of 88
2018 Bar Examinations CRIMINAL LAW
Elements
1. Offender is a public officer; 2. Competent authority demands from the
offender that he lend his cooperation towards the administration of justice or
other public service; and 3. Offender fails to do so maliciously.
31. REFUSAL TO DISCHARGE ELECTIVE OFFICE ART. 234
Elements
1. Offender is elected by popular election to a public office; 2. He refuses to
be sworn in or to discharge the duties of said office; and 3. There is no legal
motive for such refusal to be sworn in or to discharge the duties of said office.
32. MALTREATMENT OF PRISONERS ART. 235
Elements
1. Offender is a public officer or employee;
2. He has under his charge a prisoner or detention prisoner; and If the public
officer is not charged with the custody of the prisoner, he is liable for physical
injuries.
3. He maltreats such prisoner either of the following manners: a. By overdoing
himself in the correction or handling of a prisoner or detention prisoner under
his charge either: i. By the imposition of punishments not authorized by the
regulations; or ii. By inflicting such punishments (those authorized) in a cruel
or humiliating manner. b. By maltreating such prisoner to extort a confession
or to obtain some information from the prisoner
33. ANTICIPATION OF DUTIES OF A PUBLIC OFFICE ART. 236
Elements
For a person to be held liable, the following elements must be present:
1. That the offender is entitled to hold a public office or employment either by
election or appointment; 2. The law requires that he should first be sworn in
and/or should first give a bond; 3. He assumes the performance of the duties
and powers of such office; and 4. He has not taken his oath of office and/or
given the bond required by law.
34. PROLONGING PERFORMANCE OF DUTIES AND POWERS ART. 237
Elements
1. That the offender is holding a public office; 2. That the period allowed by
law for him to exercise such function and duties has already expired; and 3.
That the offender continues to exercise such function and duties.
35. ABANDONMENT OF OFFICE OR POSITION ART. 238
Elements:
1. That the offender is holding a public office; 2. That he formally resigns from
his office; The final or conclusive act of a resignation’s acceptance is the
notice of acceptance. 3. That his resignation has not yet been accepted; and
4. That he abandons his office to the detriment of the public service.
36. USURPATION OF LEGISLATIVE POWERS ART. 239
Elements
1. That the offender is an executive or judicial officer; and 2. That he: a. Makes
general rules and regulations beyond the scope of his authority; b. Attempts
to repeal a law; or c. Suspend the execution thereof.
37. USURPATION OF EXECUTIVE FUNCTIONS ART. 240
Elements
1. That the offender is a judge; and 2. That the offender: a. Assumes the
power exclusively vested to executive authorities of the Government; or b.
Obstructs executive authorities from the lawful performance of their functions.
Page 47 of 88
2018 Bar Examinations CRIMINAL LAW
Page 48 of 88
2018 Bar Examinations CRIMINAL LAW
Requisites
1. A legally married person or a parent surprises his spouse or daughter, the
latter under 18 years of age and living with him, in the act of committing sexual
intercourse; 2. He or she kills any or both of them or inflicts upon any or both
of them any serious physical injury in the act or immediately thereafter; and
3. He has not promoted or facilitated the prostitution of his wife or daughter,
or that he or she has not consented to the infidelity of the other spouse.
3. MURDER ART. 248
Elements of murder
1. That a person was killed; 2. That the accused killed him; 3. That the killing
was attended by any of the qualifying circumstances mentioned in Art. 248;
and 4. That the killing is not parricide or infanticide
Qualifying Circumstances
1. With treachery, taking advantage of superior strength, with the aid of armed
men, or employing means to weaken the defense, or of means or persons to
insure or afford impunity. If committed “by a band”, it is still murder because
of the circumstance of “with the aid of armed men.”
2. In consideration of a price, reward or promise. If this aggravating
circumstance is present in the commission of the crime, it affects not only the
person who received the money or reward but also the person who gave it.
3. By means of inundation, fire, poison, explosion, shipwreck, stranding on a
vessel, derailment or assault upon a railroad, fall of an airship, by motor
vehicles, or with the use of any other means involving great waste and ruin.
Appreciated only if the primordial criminal intent is to kill, and fire was only
used as a means to do so, it is murder. But if the primordial intent is to destroy
the property through fire and incidentally somebody died, it is arson.
Treachery and evident premeditation are inherent in murder by poison and,
as such, cannot be considered as aggravating circumstance.
4. On occasion of any of the calamities enumerated in the preceding
paragraph, or of an earthquake, eruption of volcano, destructive cyclone,
epidemic, or other public calamity
The offender must take advantage of the calamity to qualify the crime to
murder.
5. With evident premeditation
6. With cruelty, by deliberately and inhumanly augmenting the suffering of the
victim, or outraging or scoffing at his person or corpse.
Outraging means any physical act to commit an extremely vicious or deeply
insulting act while scoffing is any verbal act implying a showing of irreverence.
4. HOMICIDE ART. 249
Elements
1. That a person is killed; 2. That the accused killed him without any justifying
circumstance; 3. The accused had intention to kill which is presumed; and 4.
The killing was not attended by any of the qualifying circumstances of murder,
or by that of parricide or infanticide.
PENALTY FOR FRUSTRATED PARRICIDE, MURDER OR HOMICIDE
ART. 250
The Court may impose a penalty two degrees lower for frustrated parricide,
murder or homicide. In cases of attempted parricide, murder or homicide then
the Court may impose a penalty three degrees lower.
5. DEATH CAUSED IN A TUMULTUOUS AFFRAY ART. 251
Elements
1. There be several or at least 4 persons;
Page 49 of 88
2018 Bar Examinations CRIMINAL LAW
2. That they did not compose groups organized for the common purpose of
assaulting and attacking each other reciprocally, otherwise, they may be held
liable as co-conspirators;
3. That these several persons quarreled and assaulted one another in a
confused and tumultuous manner;
4. Someone was killed in the course of the affray;
The person killed in the course of the affray need not be one of the
participants in the affray. He could be a mere passerby.
5. It cannot be ascertained who actually killed the deceased; and
If the one who inflicted the fatal wound is known, the crime is not tumultuous
affray. It is a case of homicide.
6. The person or persons who inflicted serious physical injuries or who used
violence can be identified.
6. PHYSICAL INJURIES INFLICTED IN TUMULTUOUS AFFRAY ART. 252
Elements
1. There is a tumultuous affray as referred to in the preceding article; 2. A
participant or some participants thereof suffer serious physical injuries or
physical injuries of a less serious nature only; 3. Person responsible thereof
cannot be identified; and 4. All those who appear to have used violence upon
the person of the offended party are known
7. GIVING ASSISTANCE TO SUICIDE ART. 253
Punishable acts
1. Assisting another to commit suicide, whether the suicide is consummated
or not; and
2. Lending assistance to another to commit suicide to the extent of doing the
killing himself.
8. DISCHARGE OF FIREARM ART. 254
Elements
1. Offender discharges a firearm against another person; and 2. Offender has
no intention to kill the person.
9. INFANTICIDE ART. 255
Elements
1. A child was killed; 2. Deceased child was less than 3 days old or less than
72 hours of age; and 3. Accused killed the said child.
10. INTENTIONAL ABORTION ART. 256
The crime of intentional abortion is committed in three ways
1. By using any violence upon the person of the pregnant woman; 2. By
administering drugs or beverages upon such pregnant woman without her
consent; or 3. By administering drugs or beverages with the consent of the
pregnant woman.
Elements
1. There is a pregnant woman; 2. Violence is exerted, or drugs or beverages
administered, or that the accused otherwise acts upon such pregnant woman;
3. As a result of the use of violence or drugs or beverages upon her, or any
other act of the accused, the fetus dies, either in the womb or after having
been expelled therefrom; and 4. Abortion is intended.
11. UNINTENTIONAL ABORTION ART. 257
Elements
1. There is a pregnant woman; 2. Violence is used upon such pregnant
woman without intending an abortion; 3. Violence is intentionally exerted; and
Page 50 of 88
2018 Bar Examinations CRIMINAL LAW
4. As a result of the violence exerted, the fetus dies either in the womb or after
having been expelled therefrom.
12. ABORTION PRACTICED BY THE WOMAN HERSELF OR BY HER
PARENTS ART. 258
Elements
1. There is a pregnant woman who has suffered abortion; 2. Abortion is
intended; and 3. Abortion is caused by: a. The pregnant woman herself; b.
Any other person, with her consent; or c. Any of her parents, with her consent
for the purpose of concealing her dishonor.
13. ABORTION PRACTICED BY PHYSICIAN OR MIDWIFE AND
DISPENSING OF ABORTIVES ART. 259
Elements of this crime as to the physician or midwife
1. There is a pregnant woman who has suffered abortion; 2. Abortion is
intended; If abortion was not intended or was a result of a mistake, no crime
is committed. If the woman is not really pregnant, an impossible crime is
committed. 3. The offender must be a physician or midwife who causes or
assists in causing the abortion; and 4. Said physician or midwife takes
advantage of his or her scientific knowledge or skill.
Elements of this crime as to the pharmacists
1. Offender is a pharmacist; 2. There is no proper prescription from a
physician; and 3. Offender dispenses an abortive.
14. RESPONSIBILITY OF PARTICIPANTS IN A DUEL ART. 260
Punishable acts
1. Killing one’s adversary in a duel; 2. Inflicting upon such adversary physical
injuries; and 3. Making a combat although no physical injuries have been
inflicted.
15. CHALLENGING TO A DUEL ART. 261
Punishable acts
1. Challenging another to a duel; 2. Inciting another to give or accept a
challenge to a duel; and 3. Scoffing at or decrying another publicly for having
refused to accept a challenge to fight a duel.
16. MUTILATION ART. 262
Kinds of mutilation
1. Intentionally mutilating another by depriving him, either totally or partially,
of some essential organ for reproduction.
Elements:
a. There must be a castration, which is mutilation of organs necessary for
generation, such as the penis or ovarium; and b. The mutilation is caused
purposely and deliberately, which is to deprive the offended party of some
essential organ for reproduction.
2. Intentionally making other mutilation, that is, by lopping or clipping off of
any part of the body of the offended party, other than the essential organ for
reproduction, to deprive him of that part of his body.
17. SERIOUS PHYSICAL INJURIES ART. 263
Instances considered as the crime of serious physical injuries
1. When the injured person becomes insane, imbecile, impotent, or blind in
consequence of the physical injuries inflicted. Impotence includes inability to
copulate and sterility. Blindness requires loss of vision of both eyes. Mere
weakness in vision is not contemplated.
2. When the injured person:
Page 51 of 88
2018 Bar Examinations CRIMINAL LAW
2. Physical injuries which did not prevent the offended party from engaging in
his habitual work or which did not require medical attendance; or
3. Ill-treatment of another by deed without causing any injury.
21. RAPE ARTS. 266-A, 266-B, 266-C AND 266-D AND RA 8353
1. The traditional concept under Art. 335 – carnal knowledge with a woman
against her will. The offended party is always a woman and the offender is
always a man.
2. Sexual assault – committed with an instrument or an object or use of the
penis with penetration of the mouth or anal orifice. The offended party or
offender can either be a man or a woman, that is, if the woman or a man uses
an instrument in the anal orifice of a male, she or he can be liable for rape.
Elements of rape by a man who shall have carnal knowledge of a woman
1. Offender is a man;
2. Offender had carnal knowledge of the woman; and
3. Such act is accomplished under any of the following circumstances: a.
Through force, threat or intimidation; b. When the offended party is deprived
of reason or is otherwise unconscious; c. By means of fraudulent machination
or grave abuse of authority; or d. When the offended party is under 12 years
of age or is demented, even though none of the above circumstances
mentioned above be present.
Elements of rape by sexual assault
1. Offender commits an act of sexual assault;
2. The act of sexual assault is committed by any of the following means: a.
By inserting his penis into another person’s mouth or anal orifice, or b. By
inserting any instrument or object into the genital or anal orifice of another
person
3. The act of sexual assault is accomplished under any of the following
circumstances: a. By using force or intimidation, or b. When the woman is
deprived of reason or otherwise unconscious, or c. By means of fraudulent
machination or grave abused of authority, or d. When the woman is under 12
years of age or demented.
Statutory rape
Sexual intercourse with a girl below 12 years old is statutory rape.
Elements of statutory rape
1. That the offender had carnal knowledge of the victim; and 2. That the victim
is below twelve (12) years old
I. Crimes against Personal Liberty and Security
1. KIDNAPPING AND SERIOUS ILLEGAL DETENTION ART. 267
Elements
1. Offender is a private individual who is not any of the parents of the victim;
2. He kidnaps or detains another, or in any other manner deprives the latter
of his liberty;
3. Act of detention or kidnapping must be illegal; and
4. In the commission of the offense, any of the following circumstances is
present:
a. Kidnapping or detention lasts for more than 3 days;
b. It is committed simulating public authority;
c. Any serious physical injuries are inflicted upon the person
kidnapped or detained or threats to kill him are made; or
Page 53 of 88
2018 Bar Examinations CRIMINAL LAW
Page 54 of 88
2018 Bar Examinations CRIMINAL LAW
Page 55 of 88
2018 Bar Examinations CRIMINAL LAW
Page 56 of 88
2018 Bar Examinations CRIMINAL LAW
Page 57 of 88
2018 Bar Examinations CRIMINAL LAW
Elements
1. Offender is a private individual or even a public officer not in the exercise
of his official function; 2. He seizes the papers or letters of another; 3. Purpose
is to discover the secrets of such another person; and 4. Offender is informed
of the contents of the papers or letters seized.
22. REVEALING SECRETS WITH ABUSE OF OFFICE ART. 291
Elements
1. Offender is a manager, employee or servant; 2. He learns the secrets of
his principal or master in such capacity; and 3. He reveals such secrets.
23. REVELATION OF INDUSTRIAL SECRETS ART. 292
Elements
1. Offender is a person in charge, employee or workman of a manufacturing
or industrial establishment; 2. Manufacturing or industrial establishment has
a secret of the industry which the offender has learned; 3. Offender reveals
such secrets; and
J. Crimes against Property
1. ROBBERY ART. 293
Classification of robbery
1. Robbery with violence against, or intimidation of persons (Arts. 294, 297,
and 298)
Punishable acts under Art. 294
1. When by reason or on occasion of the robbery the crime of homicide is
committed
2. When the robbery is accompanied by:
a. Rape
b. Intentional mutilation
c. Arson
3. When by reason or on the occasion of such robbery, any of the physical
injuries resulting in:
a. Insanity
b. Imbecility
c. Impotency
d. Blindness is inflicted
4. When by reason or on the occasion of robbery, any of the physical injuries
resulting in the:
a. Loss of the use of speech
b. Loss of the power to hear or to smell
c. Loss of an eye, a hand, a foot, an arm or a leg
d. Loss of the use of any of such member
e. Incapacity for the work in which the injured person is theretofore
habitually engaged is inflicted
5. If the violence or intimidation employed in the commission of the robbery is
carried to a degree clearly unnecessary for the commission of the crime.
6. When in the course of its execution, the offender shall have inflicted upon
any person not responsible for the commission of the robbery any of the
physical injuries in consequence of which the person injured:
a. Becomes deformed
Page 58 of 88
2018 Bar Examinations CRIMINAL LAW
Page 59 of 88
2018 Bar Examinations CRIMINAL LAW
intimidation is made with the use of firearms, the offender shall be punished
by the maximum periods of the proper penalties prescribed in Art. 294.
Does not apply in cases of Robbery with homicide, robbery with intentional
mutilation, robbery with rape and robbery with serious physical injuries
resulting in insanity, imbecility, impotency or blindness. The law omitted the
above stated cases.
ATTEMPTED AND FRUSTRATED ROBBERY COMMITTED UNDER
CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCES ART. 297
It applies when homicide is committed on the occasion of an attempted or
frustrated robbery. The term homicide is used in a generic sense. It includes
murder, parricide and infanticide. The clause “unless the homicide committed
shall deserve a higher penalty under the provisions of this code” may be
illustrated thus: In an attempted or frustrated robbery, the killing of the victim
is qualified by treachery or relationship. The proper penalty for murder or
parricide shall be imposed because it is more severe.
8. EXECUTION OF DEEDS BY MEANS OF VIOLENCE OR INTIMIDATION
ART. 298
Elements
1. Offender has intent to defraud another; 2. Offender compels him to sign,
execute, or deliver any public instrument or document; and 3. Compulsion is
by means of violence or intimidation.
9. ROBBERY IN AN INHABITED HOUSE OR PUBLIC BUILDING OR
EDIFICE DEVOTED TO WORSHIP ART. 299
Elements of the 1st kind of robbery with force upon things under Art. 299
1. Offender entered an inhabited house, or public building, or edifice devoted
to religious worship;
2. Entrance was effected by any of the following means:
a. Through an opening not intended for entrance or egress;
b. By breaking any wall, roof, or floor or breaking any door or
window;
c. By using false keys, picklocks or similar tools, or
d. By using any fictitious name or pretending the exercise of public
authority. The whole body of culprit must be inside the building to constitute
entering.
3. Once inside the building, the offender took personal property belonging to
another with intent to gain.
Elements of the 2nd kind of robbery with force upon things under Art. 299
1. Offender is inside a dwelling house, public building or edifice devoted to
religious worship, regardless of circumstances under which he entered it; and
2. Offender takes personal property belonging to another, with intent to gain,
under any of the following circumstances:
a. By the breaking of doors, wardrobes, chests, or any other kind of
locked or sealed furniture or receptacle, or door. Door refers only to “doors,
lids or opening sheets” of furniture or other portable receptacles, not to inside
doors of house or building.
b. By taking such furniture or objects away to be broken or forced
open outside the place of the robbery.
NOTE: The crime committed would be estafa or theft, if the locked or sealed
receptacle is forced open in the building where it is kept and not taken away
to be broken outside.
10. ROBBERY IN AN UNINHABITED PLACE OR IN A PRIVATE BUILDING
ART. 302
Page 60 of 88
2018 Bar Examinations CRIMINAL LAW
Elements
1. Offender entered an uninhabited place or a building which was not a
dwelling house, not a public building, or not an edifice devoted to religious
worship;
2. Any of the following circumstances was present:
a. Entrance was effected through an opening not intended for
entrance or egress
NOTE: If the entrance was made through the door which was open, or closed
but unlocked, and not through the window, the person who took personal
property from the house with intent to gain is guilty only of theft and not
robbery. Where an opening created by the accidental bumping of a vehicle in
the store’s wall was made the entrance of the malefactor, the taking of the
personal property inside the store is robbery and not theft because the hole
is not intended for entrance or egress.
b. Wall, roof, floor, or outside door or window was broken
Like Robbery in an inhabited house, the breaking should be made in order to
effect the entrance into the place. So if the wall, roof, floor etc. was broken in
the course of escaping, the act committed is not Robbery.
c. Entrance was effected through the use of false keys, picklocks or
other similar tools
d. Door, wardrobe, chest, or any sealed or closed furniture or
receptacle was broken
e. Closed or sealed receptacle was removed, even if the same be
broken open elsewhere Under letters d and e, the robber did not enter through
a window or effected entrance by breaking the floor, door, wall, etc., otherwise
these circumstances by themselves already make the act as that of robbery.
In these 2 cases, the robbers entered through the door, and once inside,
broke wardrobe, sealed or close receptacles etc., or took away closed or
sealed receptacle to be broken elsewhere.
3. With intent to gain, the offender took therefrom personal property belonging
to another.
11. ROBBERY OF CEREALS, FRUITS, OR FIREWOOD IN AN
UNINHABITED PLACE OR PRIVATE BUILDING ART. 303
This applies when the robbery was committed by the use of force upon things,
without violence against or intimidation of any person in an inhabited house,
public building, or edifice devoted to religious worship (Art. 299) or in an
uninhabited place or private building (Art. 302).
12. POSSESSION OF PICKLOCKS OR SIMILAR TOOLS ART. 304
Elements
1. Offender has in his possession picklocks or similar tools; 2. Such picklocks
or similar tools are specially adopted to the commission of robbery; and 3.
Offender does not have lawful cause for such possession.
13. FALSE KEYS ART. 305
False keys
1. Picklocks or similar tools 2. Genuine keys stolen from the owner 3. Any key
other than those intended by the owner for use in the lock forcibly opened by
the offender.
14. BRIGANDAGE ART. 306
Requisites
1. There be at least 4 armed malefactors 2. They formed a band of robbers
3. The purpose is any of the following: a. To commit robbery in the highway
b. To kidnap persons for the purpose of extortion or to obtain ransom c. To
attain by means of force and violence any other purpose
Page 61 of 88
2018 Bar Examinations CRIMINAL LAW
Page 62 of 88
2018 Bar Examinations CRIMINAL LAW
Punishable acts
1. Taking possession of any real property belonging to another; and 2.
Usurping any real rights in property belonging to another.
Elements of occupation of real property or usurpation of real rights in property
1. Offender takes possession of any real property or usurps any real rights in
property; 2. Real property or real rights belongs to another; 3. Violence
against or intimidation of persons is used by the offender in occupying real
property or usurping real rights in property; and 4. There is intent to gain.
19. ALTERING BOUNDARIES OR LANDMARKS ART. 313
Elements
1. There are boundary marks or monuments of towns, provinces, or estates,
or any other marks intended to designate the boundaries of the same; and 2.
Offender alters said boundary marks.
20. CULPABLE INSOLVENCY FRAUDULENT INSOLVENCY ART. 314
Elements
1. Offender is a debtor, that is, he has obligations due and payable; 2. He
absconds with his property; and 3. There be prejudice to his creditors
22. SWINDLING (ESTAFA) ART. 315
Elements in general
1. Accused defrauded another by abuse of confidence or by means of deceit
– This covers the three different ways of committing estafa under Art. 315,
thus:
a. With unfaithfulness or abuse of confidence;
b. By means of false pretenses or fraudulent acts; or
c. Through fraudulent means
2. Damage or prejudice capable of pecuniary estimation is caused to the
offended party or third person.
Illustration: When the accused deceived the complainants into believing that
there were indeed jobs waiting for them in Taiwan, and the latter sold their
carabaos, mortgaged or sold their parcels of land and even contracted loans
to raise the P40,000.00 placement fee required of them by the accused, the
assurances given by the latter made the complainants part with whatever
resources they had, clearly establishing deceit and damage which constitute
the elements of estafa under PD 115 (Trust Receipts Law): a. The failure of
the entrustee to turn over the proceeds of the sale of the goods, documents,
or instruments covered by a trust receipt, to the extent of the amount owing
to the entruster, or as appearing in the trust receipt; or b. The failure to return
said goods, documents, or instruments if they were not sold or disposed of in
accordance with the terms of the trust receipt
Elements of estafa with unfaithfulness or abuse of confidence under
Art. 315 (1)
1. Under paragraph (a): a. Offender has an onerous obligation to deliver
something of value; b. He alters its substance, quantity, or quality; and c.
Damage or prejudice is caused to another.
2. Under paragraph (b): a. Money, goods, or other personal property is
received by the offender in trust, or on commission, or for administration, or
under any other obligation involving the duty to make delivery of, or to return,
the same; b. There is misappropriation or conversion of such money or
property by the offender, or denial on his part of such receipt; c. Such
misappropriation or conversion or denial is to the prejudice of another; and d.
There is a demand made by the offended party to the offender
3. Under paragraph (c): a. The paper with the signature of the offended party
is in blank; b. Offended party delivered it to the offender; c. Above the
Page 63 of 88
2018 Bar Examinations CRIMINAL LAW
c. There must be express representation by the offender that the real property
is free from encumbrance; and d. Act of disposing of the real property be
made to the damage of another.
If the loan had already been granted before the property was offered as a
security, Art. 316 (2) is not violated.
3. Wrongful taking of personal property from its lawful possessor to the
prejudice of the latter or a third person;
Elements:
a. Offender is the owner of personal property; b. Said personal property is in
the lawful possession of another; c. Offender wrongfully takes it from its lawful
possessor; and d. Prejudice is thereby caused to the possessor or third
person.
4. Executing any fictitious contract to the prejudice of another.
5. Accepting any compensation given to him under the belief that it was in
payment of services or labor when he did not actually perform such services
or labor.
6. Selling, mortgaging or in any manner encumbering real property while
being a surety in bond without express authority from the court or before being
relieved from the obligation.
Elements:
a. Offender is a surety in a bond given in a criminal or civil action; b. He
guaranteed the fulfillment of such obligation with his real property or
properties; c. He sells, mortgages, or, in any other manner encumbers said
real property; and d. Such sale, mortgage or encumbrance is without express
authority from the court, or made before the cancellation of his bond, or before
being relieved from the obligation contracted by him.
24. SWINDLING A MINOR ART. 317
Elements
1. Offender takes advantage of the inexperience or emotions or feelings of a
minor;
2. He induces such minor to assume an obligation, or to give release, or to
execute a transfer of any property right;
NOTE: Real property is not included because it cannot be made to disappear,
since a minor cannot convey real property without judicial authority.
3. Consideration is some loan of money, credit or other personal property;
and
4. Transaction is to the detriment of such minor
25. OTHER DECEITS ART. 318
1. Defrauding or damaging another by any other deceit not mentioned in the
preceding articles; and
2. Interpreting dreams, making forecasts, telling fortunes, or taking advantage
of the credulity of the public in any other similar manner, for profit or gain.
26. REMOVAL, SALE OR PLEDGE OF MORTGAGED PROPERTY ART.
319
Punishable acts
1. Knowingly removing any personal property mortgaged under the Chattel
Mortgage Law to any province or city other than the one in which it was
located at the time of execution of the mortgage, without the written consent
of the mortgagee or his executors, administrators or assigns.
Elements:
Page 65 of 88
2018 Bar Examinations CRIMINAL LAW
Page 66 of 88
2018 Bar Examinations CRIMINAL LAW
Page 68 of 88
2018 Bar Examinations CRIMINAL LAW
Page 69 of 88
2018 Bar Examinations CRIMINAL LAW
1. That the offender has been legally married; 2. That the marriage has not
been legally dissolved or, in case his or her spouse is absent, the absent
spouse could not yet be presumed dead according to the Civil Code; 3. That
he contracts second or subsequent marriage; and 4. That the second or
subsequent marriage has all the essential requisites for validity, except for
the existence of the first marriage
4. MARRIAGE CONTRACTED AGAINST PROVISIONS OF LAWS ART.
350
Elements
1. Offender contracted marriage; 2. He knew at the time that the: a.
Requirements of the law were not complied with; or b. Marriage was in
disregard of a legal impediment. 3. The act of the offender does not constitute
bigamy
5. PREMATURE MARRIAGES ART. 351 -R.A No. 10655 decriminalized the
act of premature marriage
6. PERFORMANCE OF ILLEGAL MARRIAGE CEREMONY ART. 352
Art. 352 punishes priests or ministers of any religious denomination or sect,
or civil authorities who shall perform or authorize any illegal marriage
ceremony.
M. Crimes against Honor (include Administrative Circular 082008 Re: Guidelines
in the Observance of a Rule of Preference in the Imposition of Penalties in
Libel Cases, January 25, 2008)
Elements
1. There must be an imputation of a crime, or of a vice or defect, real or
imaginary, or any act, omission, condition, status or circumstance;
2. Imputation must be made publicly;
3. It must be malicious;
4. It must be directed at a natural or juridical person, or one who is dead; and
5. It must tend to cause the dishonor, discredit or contempt of the person
defamed.
It is not required that the person defamed has read or heard about the libelous
remark. What is material is that a third person has read or heard the libelous
statement - for a man’s reputation is the estimate in which others hold him,
not the good opinion which he has of himself.
2. Fair and true report, made in good faith, without any comments or remarks,
of any judicial, legislative, or other official proceedings which are not of
confidential nature, or of any statement, report, or speech delivered in the
exercise of their functions.
Page 70 of 88
2018 Bar Examinations CRIMINAL LAW
Criminal and civil actions for damages in case of written defamations shall be
filed simultaneously or separately with the court of first instance of the
province or city: 1. Where the libelous article is printed and first published; or
2. Where any of the offended parties actually resides at the time of the
commission of the offense.
Elements
1. That the offender is a reporter, editor or manager of a newspaper daily or
magazine; 2. That he publishes facts connected with the private life of
another; and 3. That such facts are offensive to the honor, virtue and
reputation of said person.
Gag Law
Under R.A No. 1477, a newspaper reporter cannot be compelled to reveal the
source of the news report he made, unless the court or a House or committee
of Congress finds that such revelation is demanded by the security of the
state
Elements
1. There must be an imputation of a crime, or a vice or defect, real or
imaginary, or any act, omission, condition, status or circumstances; 2.
Imputation must be made publicly; 3. The imputation must be malicious; 4.
Page 71 of 88
2018 Bar Examinations CRIMINAL LAW
Elements
1. Offender performs any act not included in any other crime against honor;
2. Such act is performed in the presence of other person or persons; and 3.
Such act casts dishonor, discredit or contempt upon the offended party
NOTE: Art. 355 of the RPC penalizes libel with prision correctional in its
minimum and medium periods or fine ranging from 200 to 6,000 pesos, or
both, in addition to the civil action which may be brought by the offended party.
In the following cases, the Court opted to impose only a fine on the person
convicted of the crime of libel:
In Sazon v. CA (G.R No. 120715, March 29, 1996), the Court modified the
penalty imposed upon petitioner, an officer of a homeowners’ association, for
the crime of libel from imprisonment and fine in the amount of P200.00, to fine
only of P3,000.00, with subsidiary imprisonment in case of insolvency, for the
reason that he wrote the libelous article merely to defend his honor against
the malicious messages that earlier circulated around the subdivision, which
he thought was the handiwork of the private complainant.
In Mari v. CA (G.R No. 127694, May 31, 2000), where the crime involved is
slander by deed, the Court modified the penalty imposed on the petitioner, an
ordinary government employee, from imprisonment to fine of P1,000.00, with
subsidiary imprisonment in case of insolvency, on the ground that the latter
committed the offense in the heat of anger and in reaction to a perceived
provocation.
In Brillante v. CA (G.R. Nos. 118757 & 12157, November 11, 2005), the Court
deleted the penalty of imprisonment imposed upon petitioner, a local
politician, but maintained the penalty of fine of P4,0000.00, with subsidiary
imprisonment in case of insolvency, in each of the (5) cases of libel, on the
ground that the intensely feverish passions evoked during the election period
in 1988 must have agitated petitioner into writing his open letter; and that
incomplete privileged communication should be appreciated in favor of
petitioner, especially considering the wide latitude traditionally given to
defamatory utterances against public officials in connection with or relevant
to their performance of official duties or against public figures in relation to
matters of public interest involving them.
In Buatis, Jr. v. People (G.R No. 142509, March 24, 2006),the Court opted to
impose upon petitioner, a lawyer, the penalty of fine only for the crime of libel
considering that it was his first offense and he was motivated purely by his
belief that he was merely exercising a civic or moral duty to his client when
wrote the defamatory letter to private complainant
Elements
1. Offender performs an act; 2. By such act he directly incriminates or imputes
to an innocent person the commission of a crime; and 3. Such act does not
constitute perjury
7. INTRIGUING AGAINST HONOR ART. 364
Page 72 of 88
2018 Bar Examinations CRIMINAL LAW
Intriguing against honor - Any scheme or plot which may consists of some
trickery.
Persons liable - Any person who shall make any intrigue which has for its
principal purpose to blemish the honor or reputation of another person
III. QUASI-OFFENSES
A. Article 365, RPC – Criminal Negligence
IMPRUDENCE AND NEGLIGENCE ART. 365
Punishable acts
1. Committing through reckless imprudence any act which, had it been
intentional, would constitute a grave or less grave felony or light felony;
2. Committing through simple imprudence or negligence an act which
would otherwise constitute a grave or a less serious felony;
3. Causing damage to the property of another through reckless imprudence
or simple imprudence or negligence; and
4. Causing through simple imprudence or negligence some wrong which, if
done maliciously, would have constituted a light felony.
Elements of reckless imprudence
1. Offender does or fails to do an act;
2. The doing of or the failure to do that act is voluntary;
3. It be without malice;
4. Material damage results; and
5. There is an inexcusable lack of precaution on the part of the person
performing or failing to perform such act taken into consideration: a. Employment
or occupation b. Degree of intelligence c. Physical condition d. Other
circumstances regarding persons, time and place
Elements of simple imprudence
1. There is lack of precaution on the part of the offender; and
2. Damage impending to be caused is not immediate nor the danger clearly
manifested.
Doctrine of last clear chance
The last clear chance doctrine states that the contributory negligence of the party
injured will not defeat the action if it be shown that the accused might, by the
exercise of reasonable care and prudence, have avoided the consequences of the
negligence of the injured party.
Emergency rule
The emergency rule provides that an automobile driver who, by the negligence of
another and not by his own negligence, is suddenly placed in an emergency and
compelled to act instantly to avoid a collision or injury is not guilty of negligence if
he makes such a choice which a person of ordinary prudence placed in such a
position might make even though he did not make the wisest choice.
Doctrine of res ipsa loquitur
It means that the thing speaks for itself. Where the thing which causes injury is
shown to be under the management of the defendant, and the accident is such as
in the ordinary course of things does not happen if those who have the
management use proper care, it affords reasonable evidence, in the absence of
an explanation by the defendant, that the accident arose from want of care.
Elements
Page 73 of 88
2018 Bar Examinations CRIMINAL LAW
1. The accident was of a kind which does not ordinarily occur unless someone is
negligent; 2. The instrumentality or agency which caused the injury was under the
exclusive control of the person in charge; and 3. The injury suffered must not have
been due to any voluntary action or contribution of the person injured.
Page 74 of 88
2018 Bar Examinations CRIMINAL LAW
Page 75 of 88
2018 Bar Examinations CRIMINAL LAW
part, wherein the public officer in his official capacity has to intervene
under the law.
Elements:
a. The offender is a public officer; b. He requested and/or received, directly
or indirectly, a gift, present or consideration; c. The gift, present or
consideration was for the benefit of the said public officer or for any other
person; d. It was requested and/or received in connection with a contract or
transaction with the Government; and e. The public officer has the right to
intervene in such contract or transaction in his official capacity
(c) Directly or indirectly requesting or receiving any gift, present or other
pecuniary or material benefit, for himself or for another, from any person
for whom the public officer, in any manner or capacity, has secured or
obtained, or will secure or obtain, any Government permit or license, in
consideration for the help given or to be given, without prejudice to
Section thirteen of this Act.
(d) Accepting or having any member of his family accept employment
in a private enterprise which has pending official business with him
during the pendency thereof or within one year after its termination.
Elements:
a. The public officer accepted, or having any of his family member accept any
employment in a private enterprise; b. Such private enterprise has a pending
official business with the public officer; and c. It was accepted during: i. The
pendency thereof; or ii. Within 1 year after its termination.
(e) Causing any undue injury to any party, including the Government, or
giving any private party any unwarranted benefits, advantage or
preference in the discharge of his official administrative or judicial
functions through manifest partiality, evident bad faith or gross
inexcusable negligence. This provision shall apply to officers and
employees of offices or government corporations charged with the
grant of licenses or permits or other concessions.
Elements:
a. The accused must be a public officer discharging administrative, judicial or
official functions; b. He must have acted with manifest partiality, evident bad
faith or inexcusable negligence; and c. That his action caused: i. Any undue
injury to any party, including the government; or ii. Giving any private party
unwarranted benefits, advantage or preference in the discharge of his
functions.
Note: Since bad faith is an element, good faith and lack of malice is a valid
defense.
(f) Neglecting or refusing, after due demand or request, without
sufficient justification, to act within a reasonable time on any matter
pending before him for the purpose of obtaining, directly or indirectly,
from any person interested in the matter some pecuniary or material
benefit or advantage, or for the purpose of favoring his own interest or
giving undue advantage in favor of or discriminating against any other
interested party.
Elements:
a. Offender is a public officer; b. Public officer neglected or refused to act
without sufficient justification after due demand or request has been made on
him; c. Reasonable time has elapsed from such demand or request without
the public officer having acted on the matter pending before him; and d. Such
failure to act is for the purpose of: i. Obtaining (directly or indirectly) from any
person interested in the matter some pecuniary or material benefit or
advantage; ii. Favoring his own interest; or iii. Giving undue advantage in
favor of or discriminating against any other interested party.
Page 76 of 88
2018 Bar Examinations CRIMINAL LAW
Page 78 of 88
2018 Bar Examinations CRIMINAL LAW
Page 79 of 88
2018 Bar Examinations CRIMINAL LAW
Page 80 of 88
2018 Bar Examinations CRIMINAL LAW
Page 81 of 88
2018 Bar Examinations CRIMINAL LAW
Page 82 of 88
2018 Bar Examinations CRIMINAL LAW
Page 83 of 88
2018 Bar Examinations CRIMINAL LAW
Page 84 of 88
2018 Bar Examinations CRIMINAL LAW
Page 85 of 88
2018 Bar Examinations CRIMINAL LAW
S. Juvenile Justice and Welfare Act (R.A. No. 9344, as amended by R.A. No.
10630, and in relation to P.D. No. 603)
Diversion Program
Diversion Program refers to the program that the child in conflict with the law
is required to undergo after he/she is found responsible for an offense without
resorting to formal court proceedings, subject to the following conditions:
1. Where the imposable penalty for the crime committed is not more than six
(6) years of imprisonment, the law enforcement officer or Punong Barangay
with the assistance of the local social welfare and development officer or other
members of the LCPC shall conduct mediation, family conferencing and
conciliation;
2. In victimless crimes where the imposable penalty is not more than six (6)
years of imprisonment, the local social welfare and development officer shall
meet with the child and his/her parents or guardians for the development of
the appropriate diversion and rehabilitation program; and
3. Where the imposable penalty for the crime committed exceeds six (6) years
of imprisonment, diversion measures may be resorted to only by the court.
Intervention
Intervention refers to a series of activities which are designed to address
issues that caused the child to commit an offense. It may take the form of an
individualized treatment program which may include counseling, skills
training, education, and other activities that will enhance his/ her
psychological, emotional and psycho-social wellbeing. An intervention
program covering at least a 3-year period shall be instituted in LGUs from the
barangay to the provincial level.
T. Probation Law (P.D. No. 968, as amended by R.A. No. 10707) – Probation -
It is a disposition under which a defendant, after conviction and sentence, is
released subject to conditions imposed by the court and to the supervision of
a probation officer.
Disqualification to avail the benefits of the probation law
1. Sentenced to serve a maximum term of imprisonment of more than six (6)
years;
2. Convicted of subversion or any crime against the national security or the
public order;
3. Who have previously been convicted by final judgment of an offense
punishable by imprisonment of not less than one month and one day and/or
a fine of not less than two hundred pesos;
4. Who have been once on probation under the provision of this Decree;
5. Who are already serving sentence at the time the substantive provisions of
this Decree became applicable pursuant to Section 33 hereof;
6. If he appeals the judgment or conviction;
7. If he is convicted of violation of Election offenses; or
8. Any person convicted for drug trafficking or pushing under RA 9165
regardless of the penalty imposed
U. Cybercrime Prevention Act (R.A. No. 10175)
Punishable Acts
1. Illegal access - The access to the whole or any part of a computer system
without right
2. Illegal Interception - The interception made by technical means without
right of any non-public transmission of computer data to, from, or within a
computer system including electromagnetic emissions from a computer
system carrying such computer data.
Page 86 of 88
2018 Bar Examinations CRIMINAL LAW
Page 87 of 88
2018 Bar Examinations CRIMINAL LAW
Punishable Acts:
1. Conspiracy to commit terrorism;
2. Unauthorized or malicious interceptions and/or recording;
3. Failure to deliver suspect to the proper judicial authority within three days;
4. Violation of the rights of detainee committed b the police officer or his
superior if the police officer is not identified;
5. Threat, intimidation, coercion, or torture in the investigation and
interrogation of a detained person;
6. Unauthorized or malicious examination of a bank or a financial institution;
7. Defiance by the bank office or employee of court authorization;
8. False, untruthful statement or misrepresentation of material fact in joint
affidavits;
9. Unjustified refusal to restore or delay in restoring seized, sequestered and
frozen bank deposits, placements, trust accounts, assets and records;
10. Loss, misuse, diversion or dissipation of seized, sequestered and frozen
bank deposits;
11. Infidelity in the custody of detained persons;
12. Unauthorized revelation of classified materials; and
13. Furnishing false evidence, forged document, or spurious evidence.
EXCLUDE Special criminal laws and administrative circulars not included in the
above listing, as follows:
A. Anti-Alias Law (R.A. No. 142)
B. Anti-Money Laundering Law Act of 2010 (R.A. No. 9160 as amended by
R.A. No. 9194)
C. Anti-Photo and Video Voyeurism Act of 2009 (R. A. No. 9995)
D. Code of Conduct of Public Officials and Employees (R.A. No. 6713)
E. Government Procurement Reform Act (R.A. No. 9184)
IMPORTANT NOTES:
• The listing of covered topics is not intended and should not be used by law schools
as a course outline. This listing has been drawn up for the limited purpose of
ensuring that the Bar candidates are guided on the coverage of the 2018 Bar
Examinations.
• All laws, rules, issuances, and jurisprudence pertinent to every subject and its
listed topics as of June 30, 2017 are examinable materials within the coverage of
the 2018 Bar Examinations.
• Principles of law are not covered by the cut-off period stated herein.
Page 88 of 88