Search: Week 6 - Tutorial 5
Search: Week 6 - Tutorial 5
Week 6 - TUTORIAL 5
TUTORIAL 5:
Search
1. Aman, a police inspector, has obtained from the Magistrate a search warrant which was
dated 4th July 2016 (Monday) to conduct a search on the premises of Bersih. The search
warrant did not specify the period it was to remain in force. Aman executed the search
warrant on 15h July 2016 (Friday) and seized several jewelries from the premises. Being
aggrieved, Bersih filed a criminal application by way of notice of motion at the High Court
and sought a declaration that Aman’s execution of the search warrant was unlawful, and an
order that the seized jewelries be returned to Bersih.
Argue for and against Bersih if the application made is justified? You are also required
to raise an argument if the items seized can be tendered as evidence in court if Bersih is
charged for an offence of retaining stolen property under the Penal Code.
2. In the course of conducting search under Chapter VI of the CPC, police officer Patto has
failed to prepare a list of stolen items seized by him from the house occupied by the
accused Ken. However Patto wishes to tender the stolen items as exhibits in the trial
against Ken who is facing a charge of theft under section 379 of the Penal Code.
Argue a case for and against the prosecution on the necessity of preparing such a list
and the consequences of the failure to do so.
FOL/FORM
05.07.2013