The Field Guide To Extraterrestrials - Patrick Huyghe
The Field Guide To Extraterrestrials - Patrick Huyghe
The Field Guide To Extraterrestrials - Patrick Huyghe
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Introduction
W hat Is Rea l? ................................................................ 1
A Little History............................................................. 2
The A liens..................................................................... 5
W ho's W ho?.................................................................. 8
About This Guide ........................................................ 11
The Classification S ystem ........................................... 13
Classification Table....................................................... 16
Humanoid ......................................................................... 17
Animation ......................................................................... 69
Robotic.............................................................................. 97
Exotic .................................................................................113
A fte rw o rd
Too Human? Or Too M any A liens?........................... 122
Those G rays................................................................... 123
Beyond Looks ...............................................................125
Where Do They Come From? W hat Do They Want?....127
P attern s........................................................................... 128
Things Are Not W hat They S eem .............................. 130
Evidence..........................................................................131
A c k n o w le d g m e n ts ..............................................................132
B ib lio g r a p h y ......................................................................133
Ca se In d e x .......................................................................135
INTRODUCTION
W
hatIsReal?
Nature lovers have their National Audubon Society Field Guides.
Science-fiction buffs have Barlowe’s Guide to Extraterrestrials: Great
Aliens from Science Fiction Literature. And folklorists have A Field
Guide to the Little People by Nancy Arrowsmith and George
Moorse. But what about the 5 million Americans who, as a
recent Roper Survey suggests, may have been abducted by UFO
aliens: What do they have? Well, nothing—until now.
Welcome to The Field Guide to Extraterrestrials. Though it may
sound like science fiction, it most definitely is not. This volume
is based entirely on eyewitness reports of alleged UFO aliens.
These reports come from all around the globe and from people
of all walks of life—police officers, farmers, doctors, truck driv
ers, lawyers, pilots, children, and housewives, among others.
And these encounters have been going on for a long, long time—
at least a century or more.
If these creatures really are what they appear to be—
extraterrestrials—then this guide should prove absolutely indis
pensable, especially if you think you've encountered an
extraterrestrial or consider yourself a true-blue UFO believer. It
might even be wise to adapt the travel advice of Leonard Maltin
and American Express for this field guide: Don't get lost in space
without it.
If you're a skeptic, no doubt you' laugh at this idea. But I
want to make it clear that I am not out to convince the reader
of the reality of extraterrestrials. I do not wish to change any
minds, only to open a few eyes. I'll be the first to admit that
these UFO stories are quite unbelievable. And I would agree
that the evidence for the reality of extraterrestrial aliens is not
conclusive—only suggestive. So if you decide to look down
skeptically on these stories, you have every right to do so.
There may very well be a psychological explanation for this
material, though so far no one has made a truly convincing
case for one.
What I have done here, quite simply, is taken "nonfiction"
at counts of UFO entities and proceeded with the assumption—
granted, a very large one—that these reported beings are what
the witnesses and investigators say they are, that is, extraterres
1
trials. For the purposes of this book I will assume that these UFO-
related aliens are real.
Belief actually doesn't matter. Whether you think that
encounters with UFO aliens are physically real or mere halluci
nations is irrelevant. We have field guides to wildlife. We have
dream dictionaries. We have folklore encyclopedias. Some deal
with things that are objectively real, others deal with things that
are subjectively real. But whatever the nature of the reality, our
knowledge of it can be organized.
With Madison Avenue appropriating aliens to sell their prod
ucts, it's clear that our culture's current intense interest in all
manner of things extraterrestrial has now attained corporate-
level strength. So before the subject becomes warped beyond all
recognition, I've decided to present this who's who to the
extraterrestrial horde.
ALittleHistory
Eyewitness reports of contact with alien beings seen in crafts
descending from the sky are now at least a century old. The first
apparent claim of contact with an alien craft reportedly took
place on November 25, 1896. That afternoon Colonel H. G.
Shaw and his companion Camille Spooner were nearly abduct
ed by three tall creatures with large eyes who eventually depart
ed in a cigar-shaped craft. Shaw was convinced the craft and the
beings were from Mars. The story, though probably regarded as
a tall tale at the time, is remarkably similar to those that appear
in great abundance today, nearly a century later.
Reports of close encounters with alleged aliens continued to
appear after the turn of the century. Incidents occurred in the
summer of 1901 in Bournebrook, England; in 1910 in Baltimore,
Maryland; in 1919 in western Australia; in 1925 in La Mancha,
Spain; in 1944 in Rochester, Pennsylvania—and right on up to
and after June 24,1947, when a sighting of several mysterious
craft by pilot Kenneth Arnold led a newsman to label these
objects "flying saucers." Within weeks of this milestone event,
encounters with little men from spaceships were reported in
Tennessee, Italy, and France. It should be noted that most flying
saucer investigators of the time rejected these humanoid stories
as just too fantastic. The flying saucer stories were already hard
enough to believe; tales of UFO pilots were just beyond the pale.
By the early 1950s, the reports of encounters with spacemen
2
took on a wholly different look. Some people were beginning to
claim close contacts with the "space brothers." These encounters
were of a less fearful nature than earlier reports and also less a
product of chance. And the spacemen looked different, too. They
were very human, often tall, blond, and beautiful.
One of the first contactees was George Adamski, a Polish-
born emigre who worked a food and drink stand on the slopes
of Mount Palomar in California and took pictures of what he
claimed were alien spaceships. Then on November 29, 1952, he
drove out into the desert with some friends to see a spacecraft.
When it arrived, Adamski had his friends wait a mile away while
he went off to meet a man he claimed was from Venus.
But for his shoulder-length blond hair, the friendly Venusian
looked like a regular guy. He communicated with Adamski
through sign language and telepathy, preaching peace and anti
nuclear sentiments, and telling Adamski of their "mother ships"
in orbit and "scout ships" that visited Earth. In the years that fol
lowed, Adamski claimed not only to have met aliens from most
of the planets in the solar system but also to have visited the
Moon, with its trees and rivers—all of which proved to be scientifc
ally absurd. Dozens of other contactee tales followed
Adamski's, further reducing the credibility of any stories involv
ing alien beings and UFOs.
Yet, along with a flood of science fiction movies dealing with
a variety of monsters from outer space, the close encounters
continued. In fact, the entire situation took a dramatic turn in
October of 1954, when a flood of credible alien contact stories
emerged from France and other parts of Europe. In sharp contrast
to the tall friendly space brothers, however, these aliens
tended lo be short and rather aggressive. A few French investi
gators look these reports seriously. Then in November and
December another wave of entity reports emerged, this time
from South America, and another handful of researchers became
believers. For most of the rest of the world, however, this was
still all very silly stuff.
But in the decade and a half that followed, three highly signifcant
cases occurred that served to convince many more open-
minded people that the occupant reports were not only real but
potentially threatening. The first took place in Brazil in
November of 1957 and involved the first abduction of a human,
Antonio Villas-Boas, by aliens for apparently sexual purposes.
What is significant about this episode is that the story was
ignored as absurd at the time even by UFO researchers and was
3
not written up in English until the mid-1960s. By this time a sec
ond landmark case had occurred, that of Betty and Barney Hill
in New Hampshire in September of 1961. The Hill case bore
many similarities to the earlier Villas-Boas story, but it, too, did
not reach the press until 1965. By this time a third case, the case
that some say convinced the world, had already occurred and
made believers out of many former skeptics.
This landmark case, which is not included in this field guide
because the description of the entity seen was not detailed
enough for an artist's reconstruction, occurred in the late after
noon of April 24, 1964. A police officer named Lonnie Zamora
was on patrol outside of Socorro, New Mexico, when he was dis
tracted by a loud roaring noise and a blue tapering flame low on
the horizon. When he investigated, he realized that the flame
was descending into an open canyon. Suddenly the flame and
noise stopped, and he saw an egg-shaped craft far enough in the
distance that he thought it might be a car overturned by vandals.
As he approached in his patrol car, Zamora spotted what
appeared to be two "kids" beside the polished white metal object.
Slightly smaller than an adult, the kids, strangely enough, were
wearing white one-piece suits. Zamora then realized that things
were not what they seemed.
The police officer took his eyes off the scene for a moment
as he called in a possible accident on his police radio. Zamora
then pulled his car to a stop and got out just as the loud roar
started up again, and he saw a flame beneath the object as it rose
into the sky. By the time the police chief responded to his initial
call, the object had sped away and disappeared. But upon inves
tigation, the police found that the bushes were still smoldering
in the place where the object had landed. There were also four
indentations in the ground, apparently marks left behind from
the object's landing gear, which Zamora had seen as it took off.
The caliber of the witness was such that the police chief cor
doned off the area and launched an immediate inquiry in which
the FBI, CIA, and Air Force all became involved, either directly
or indirectly. Other witnesses had called the police station claim
ing to have seen a mysterious flame or heard a deafening noise.
Yet, despite a concerted effort to find an explanation for the inci
dent, the case was never solved. It certainly was not for lack of
trying. Major Hector Quintanilla, then director of the Air Force's
Project Blue Book, did everything he could to solve the case, tak
ing it all the way to the White House, but still he came up
empty-handed.
4
By the late 1960s the reality of UFO-related entities was no
longer such a taboo subject. Gradually it dawned on UFO inves
tigators that these reports actually represented a topic of signifi
cant probative value. Many thought that a solution to the UFO
mystery could come only through the investigation of these
"occupant" or "entity" cases. Recognition of a sort came in 1972,
when the astronomer and former advisor for the Air Force's
Project Blue Book, J. Allen Hynek, coined the term "Close
Encounters of the Third Kind" for claims "in which the presence
of animated creatures is reported." When Steven Spielberg
appropriated the term for his blockbuster movie of the same title
five years later, the subject of UFO aliens would soon become
deeply etched on the public mind.
TheAliens
The popular image of extraterrestrials is of short humanlike
beings with lightbulb-shaped heads, almond-shaped black eyes,
and fragile bodies. They are said to have an obsession with
human physiology and reproduction, siphoning off sperm and
ova from their human subjects, inserting nasal tracking
implants, and showing off their weird hybrid babies. This image
of the Grays, as they now are commonly known, took firm root
in the mainstream soil of cultural consciousness with the publi
cation of Whitley Strieber's nonfiction best-seller Communion in
1987. The portrait of the Grays on the cover of his book struck a
chord of recognition in many people.
If the Grays are it, or more precisely them, why then, you
might argue, do we need a field guide? Well, to begin with,
although the Grays are by far the most common type of extrater
restrial now encountered, there are many variants involved.
Generally speaking, the Grays are three and a half feet tall and
possess the characteristic grayish white skin. They have large,
hairless, fetuslike heads with narrow jaws that taper to a "V."
Their black eyes have no pupils or eyelids and wrap around the
head to the temple. They have no nose, just small nostril holes,
and a thin, lipless slit for a mouth. Their torsos are rather
scrawny; their arms and legs are long and thin. And their hands
have three nontapering fingers.
But there are also reports of Grays that are five, six, or seven
feet tall. Some have brown or black skin. Some have eyes with a
thin nictitating membrane. Some have fine wispy hair. Some
5
have four fingers, and others have fingers that end in suction-
cup tips or claws. Some have large folds along the back of their
heads, deep creases along their foreheads, or a pronounced brow
ridge about the eyes. Another source of variation among the
Grays, though clearly cultural, is clothing. Some wear jumpsuits
or long robes. Some outfits are blue; some are not. Others appear
not to wear clothes. In sum, the differences in size and appear
ance among the Grays may represent their origins on different
planets, or it may not. There is really no way to know with the
information available. The point is that there are many types of
Grays.
Although we have been culturally conditioned to believe
that the Grays who spirit people out of their bedrooms or cars
are the aliens, these creatures are by no means the only type of
beings encountered. There is a great diversity of UFO occupants,
and I see no reason to discard one in favor of another. I don't feel
that popularity is necessarily a reliable barometer of reality.
Besides, there has been a tendency on the part of some investi
gators to ignore reports of extremely odd aliens, to ignore data
that do not suit their theories. This book attempts to redress that
situation, portraying extraterrestrial anatomy in all its various
forms.
Either the eyewitness reports can be trusted, or they can't. If
they are reliable, then the aliens certainly display a bewildering
array of anatomical forms and show a great diversity of shape,
size, skin color, and other features. Through the years there have
been aliens of all colors: black, white, red, orange, yellow, blue,
violet, and of course, gray and green. They can be minuscule,
just a few inches tall, or tower above the witnesses, standing 10
feet tall or more. They range from small hairy dwarfs to bald
giants. Some look nearly human, others comically alien. A few
are living manifestations of a nightmare. While they often look
like flesh-and-blood or metallic beings, many can perform
ghostlike feats such as walking through walls. They display var
ious eccentricities in their dress, behavior, and speech content.
Some act like saints, others like demons. And when it comes to
telling fibs, it has been noted, no politician on Earth could do
better.
Yet, despite their variety, there is a certain consistency of
description. While some aliens are reported as being mere blobs
or resembling a Coke machine, the vast majority of reported
aliens are described as bipeds, though there have been a few
reports of unipeds as well. The presence of legs, however, does
6
not necessarily imply their use for locomotion, as many aliens
are apparently able to float in the air, at least in this world. Their
legs pretty much vary as humans legs do, while the feet are usu
ally not described in much detail, other than when they are
strikingly different from our own—the disk-shaped pedestal foot
of one uniped seen in Brazil comes to mind.
Almost all aliens have torsos of some kind with upper and
lower limbs and a head, though there are exceptions here as
well. Some apparently have no arms, others have more than
two, and on rare occasions the upper limbs take the form of ten
tacles or wings. Mostly their arms end in hands, though not
always, and when they do they often have fewer than the usual
complement of fingers—three or four being most common. In a
few cases, claws or strange tool-like instruments have been
reported in the place of hands.
When it comes to heads, a few aliens actually don't seem to
possess one. But unlike their counterparts in science fiction,
none have more than one. Many aliens have larger than normal
heads, the cranium often being disproportionately large, but pos
sessing a head does not necessarily entail having a neck, if some
alien descriptions can be trusted.
Though alien faces vary enormously, most follow a general
human arrangement of features. Almost all have two forward
-facing eyes, but a few are graced with a third or possess fewer
than the standard number—one or none. Their eyes, in any case,
are often larger than a human's or rounder or more slitlike, and
tend to wrap further around their heads than ours. They are
usually solid black and without pupils, whites, or irises.
Sometimes their eyes are reported as glowing or multiple like a
fly's or possessing vertical pupils. Aliens often lack a nose, hav
ing only nostrils, or else they seem to posses a particularly sharp
one. Their mouths are usually small, almost always lipless, and
therefore resemble a mere slit. Reports of teeth are extremely
rare. Aliens' ears also rarely receive mention, either because
they don't have any or because they are mere orifices.
Occasionally the ears will resemble an animal's: a calf's, say, or a
mouse's.
The skin of the aliens also shows great variation. The ubiq
uitous small humanoids known as the Grays have smooth, pale,
hairless skin, which can be either pasty-looking or translucent.
Often witnesses can't tell if they are seeing the aliens' naked skin
or their tight-fitting clothing. This confusion can, for instance,
lead an observer to describe an alien with silvery skin or cloth
7
ing as a robot. The wrinkled skin of a few aliens has led witness
es to refer to this type as the "Elders." Another humanoid type
has a distinctly pockmarked or ruddy skin. Reports of green
skinned aliens—literally "little green men"—are rare but not
uncommon. Some animal-like aliens seem to have a scaly, rep
tilian skin. There are also many reports of extremely hairy aliens;
often these have a more humanoid than animal form.
Who'sWho?
During the past quarter century, several researchers have
tried to bring some order to the perplexing variety of alien forms
by creating classification systems of one kind or another. Many
researchers, hoping perhaps to make the extraterrestrial hypoth
esis more palatable, tend to shoehorn the number of alien
descriptions into a handful of general types. Typically the
researcher will distinguish between just four basic types: the
small humanoid, the experimental animal, the humanlike enti
ty, and the robot. While this is a reasonable broad-brush
approach to the topic, such a system fails not only to cover the
entire range of alien types but also to address the dozens of small
differences between the reported entities within each of these
categories.
Other researchers have tried to categorize the entity reports
by size. Longtime UFO researcher Richard Hall, for example,
divided the alien horde into the three-to-four-foot-tall
humanoids with large heads and slender bodies; the five-to-six-
foot entities that resemble humans; and the giant or monster
form, for those standing eight to twelve feet tall and possessing
grotesque features. He also has a fourth category of nonbiologi
cal beings that includes robots and androids. But once again, this
classification system fails to account for many entities—primari
ly the great many short humanoids that do not resemble the
standard Grays.
One of the earliest, and still today most complete, attempts
at a detailed classification of UFO entities came in the late 1960s
from a Brazilian investigator named Jader U. Pereira. He exam
ined more than 200 UFO occupant cases from around the world
and found that nearly 96 percent of them were of human or
humanoid form. Interestingly enough, Pereira chose as his pri
mary distinguishing characteristic whether or not the entities
wore a helmet or breathing apparatus. This is certainly sensible,
8
as creatures needing such equipment to survive on Earth should
be biologically quite different from those who do not.
Ultimately, however, I think this distinguishing feature does
not work for one very simple reason. Most of the alleged aliens
simply do not appear to need any breathing apparatus in our
atmosphere. Therefore, most of the aliens would fall into a sin
gle category. Pereira, of course, was not unaware of this prob
lem, as two-thirds of the entities in his study wore no helmet or
breathing apparatus of any kind.
Realizing that the use or nonuse of a breathing apparatus
was not enough of a distinguishing feature, Pereira went on to
classify his aliens into a dozen types, again primarily on the basis
of size. But in some categories he determined an alien type by
cultural rather than somatic characteristics, a mistake I have
tried to avoid in my own classification system. Pereira's Type 3,
for example, were "males with long hair." Besides length of hair,
oilier cultural characteristics inappropriate for a biological typol
ogy would include language, clothing, and any tools or objects
used by the entities.
My biggest objection to Pereira's classification system, how
ever, is that it lacked a category for anything apparently nonhu
man or nonhumanoid. He grouped encounters of this kind into
a noncategory he called "isolated cases" because they amounted
to only a handful of cases. Although such creatures are in the
minority, they are by no means rare, and I believe they deserve
a category of their own.
Pereira's system was criticized by many and never really
taught on with UFO researchers. Most came to think that a pre
cise classification of alien types was an impossible task. Each
being encountered seemed in some way so unique that any true
typology of alien beings would need hundreds of types, sub-
types, and variants to even pretend at completeness. Perhaps
with this in mind, the creators of the Humanoid Catalog, better
known as HUMCAT, did not even attempt to classify the entities
themselves. This computer-based file of humanoid cases, begun
in (he early 1970s by David Webb and Ted Bloetcher, simply
sorted the cases by the type of event—whether, for instance, the
case involved an abduction—rather than by the appearance of
the humanoids themselves. When the researchers looked at the
entity descriptions, however, they found the creatures could be
divided into three classes, but again the system was based pri
marily on height. They called the shorter ones, those three feet
tall or less, dwarves or creatures in divers suits. Then came the
9
"normals" or humanoid-type creatures who ranged from four to
six feet tall. And their third category involved the relatively
uncommon giant or anthropoid creatures.
But obviously, a flexible classification system of alien types
according to broad "families" has its advantages. Such a system
can provide a much needed overview of the alien encounter
phenomenon. It can give people unfamiliar with the literature
on the subject an idea of what eyewitnesses generally report,
while researchers involved with the minutia of individual cases
get a better view of the "forest."
The French researcher Eric Zucher realized this, and for his
1979 analysis of French entity cases he created an eight-part
classification system that, unfortunately, was based largely on
Pereira's work. Most recently, Linda Moulton Howe has begun
an informal classification system of alien types that depends in
part on size but also on hair, lack of hair, or hair color. Also
worth mentioning is the attempt by Indiana folklorist Thomas
Bullard to classify the alien horde based entirely on reports of
abduction cases. His enormously detailed study found three gen
eral types of beings.
The most common were the humanoids, which Bullard
defined as essentially human in shape and makeup "but differ
ent enough that you would notice one if you passed him on the
street." This category accounted for two-thirds of the beings
reported in abduction cases. Another quarter of the cases fit into
a category he called "human" for those beings falling within the
normal range of human variation. The remaining cases Bullard
threw into a catchall category of nonhuman, nonhumanoid
beings. This latter category made up less than 10 percent of the
cases he examined.
I think Bullard's initial breakdown of alien types has two
weaknesses. His third or catchall category—which includes
robots, featureless life-forms, bigfoot-like creatures, brain
shaped entities, flying jelly bags, and buglike creatures—fails to
distinguish between the biological and the mechanical. His alien
typology also splits off the human look-alikes from the
humanoid category, although by definition, it seems that the
human is the standard bearer of the humanoid form and belongs
in this category more than any other.
In any case, I think it worth noting that although the most
common humanoids in Bullard's study were Grays, he conclud
ed that "too many nonstandard descriptions [of the aliens] meet
10
the same criteria of reliability as standard descriptions to throw
away one and keep the other."
AboutThisGuide
The cases in this field guide have been carefully selected. I
did my best not to include any case I knew to be a hoax,
although, human nature being what it is, there are no doubt a
few of them in this guide. I also excluded, for purely practical
reasons, many well-known UFO occupant cases, as most entity
descriptions simply do not provide sufficient detail for their
inclusion in a field guide of this kind. Witnesses either do not
remember enough details of their encounters with these crea
tures for an artist to reconstruct what they saw, or the observers
were not close enough to obtain the necessary details. It's also
possible that the reporters or investigators of the incident failed
to note the necessary details in their written accounts.
A few cases, surprisingly enough, provide no details at all of
the entity observed. One is the famous case of Sonny Desvergers,
the Florida scoutmaster who on August 19, 1952, walked into
some woods to investigate what he thought was an airplane
crash. Leaving three Boy Scouts behind in his car, Desvergers cut
his way through 200 yards of palmetto thickets and came to a
clearing where, upon looking up, he saw a metallic object blott
ing out the sky. Then, just before being hit by a fireball and
blacking out, the scoutmaster saw a horrible being peering at
him from the turret of the object. When asked by an investigator
afterward what the being looked like, Desvergers replied, "I
can't tell you!" Asked by the investigator if it was too horrible to
describe, the witness replied, "Let it go at that. I don't want to
tal k about it." One can't help but wonder if what the scoutmaster
saw more than four decades ago could be all that different—
or more horrible—than some of the stranger creatures described
in this field guide.
The lack of observational precision in most entity cases
means that the most detailed descriptions we have of the aliens
come from UFO landing reports, where the occupants of the
craft were observed at close range, or even better yet from
abduction reports, where the abductee by definition comes in
close contact with the aliens. I have deliberately chosen cases
drawn from a variety of observational situations so as not to skew
11
the guide in favor of one kind of UFO experience or another.
I should also make clear that I never dismissed a case solely
on the being's description, no matter how preposterous it
seemed or how much it offended my common sense. The histo
ry of UFOlogy is littered with discarded beliefs based on such
personal notions of what is and is not possible or acceptable. In
the mid-1960s, when my interest in the subject developed, the
premier UFO organization in the country accepted reports of
strange lights in the sky but looked warily at reports of UFO
"landings," and should any mention be made of "occupants," the
case was automatically rejected.
Not until the late 1960s, with the publicity surrounding the
Betty and Barney Hill case, did UFO organizations begin to take
seriously the reports of entities, though as I've noted, these
aliens had been reported in considerable numbers since the
emergence of the "flying saucer" phenomenon in 1947 and even
before. Now, of course, UFO organizations are interested in little
else but the closest of all encounter stories—the abduction
reports. Many of these are bedroom encounters with the black-
eyed creatures and never even seem to involve a UFO or flying
saucer. The craft have become superfluous.
But the presence of a craft in relation to an alien entity is
essential to this field guide. There are innumerable reports of
strange entities, some of which are seen the same day as a UFO
is spotted or in the area of recent UFO activity, but these were
not included in this volume. Unless there was a direct connec
tion to a UFO of some sort, the entity report was excluded from
this guide. As far as I'm concerned, unless the entity is described
as emerging from, seen in, or at least in very close physical or
temporal proximity to a strange unidentified object, the already
slim chance of that entity being extraterrestrial becomes just too
vanishingly small. It seems to me that without a craft of some
sort, the observed being might just as well be a ghost, fairy,
demon, or some other kind of occult, electromagnetic, or men
tal creation.
For this reason I have also chosen to exclude reports of the
mysterious Men in Black who have been known to harass some
UFO witnesses after their sightings. The Men in Black are usual
ly described as tall humans in black suits but with something not
quite right about them. Their skin may be of a corpselike pallor,
or their eyes may be in some sense unusual, or their voice may
seem mechanical. In any case, while some researchers believe
these are government agents, others think the MIB, as they are
12
commonly known, are extraterrestrials in human disguise. But
with only one questionable exception I know of, the MIB are
never seen in conjunction with a UFO.
My proposed classification scheme for the alien horde does
not pretend to be scientific. I am not trying to lay out the basis
of an extraterrestrial anthropology. I'm simply trying to establish
a typology of creatures that are reported to be of an extraterres
trial nature. It's really the best anyone can do considering the
eyewitnesses are not biologists and the information they provide
might have been distorted by errors of perception and belief, by
the state of consciousness or situation they experienced, or by
the investigators and reporters who have drawn the details of
their experiences out of them.
I have not been able to classify the observed aliens into
species, families, or such, as we know nothing or next to noth
ing about their genetic makeup or their breeding capabilities.
And without actual specimens to examine, it is impossible to
assign these creatures to any true taxonomic classification system.
To make matters worse, I have never seen an extraterres
trial and neither has my illustrator. Nor have most scientists, I
might add.
So how does one describe creatures whose existence is not
only not recognized by science but vehemently denied? Well,
you go with what you've got, and what you've got is a plethora
of anecdotal reports. And then you make the best of them. The
problem is that, for the most part, the physical descriptions of
extraterrestrials differ substantially from one eyewitness to the
next. Yet after examining dozens of such cases, hundreds actual
ly, I have found that the entities reported fall naturally into a few
broad categories that help to bring some much needed order to
the bewildering variety of alien reports.
TheClassificationSystem
My classification system is based strictly on how the aliens
look, on their phenotype: in other words, the observable physi
cal characteristics of these creatures. On this basis I have been
able to distinguish four reasonably separate CLASSES of aliens.
These constitute the broadest possible categories of this alien
typology. But within each of these major classes, I further found
several different TYPES of entities. And since there was still
considerable variation within each of these types, I needed to
13
further subdivide the alien types into VARIANTS. These vari
ants are drawn from specific cases and constitute the descriptive
events that form the heart of this field guide.
The first, and by far the largest, class of aliens is the
HUMANOID. This class is reserved for those extraterrestrials
who exhibit the same basic body plan as the human: They have
a cylindrical trunk surmounted by a head with two arms and
two legs attached at the shoulders and hips, respectively. When
the aliens were more animal than human, I placed them into a
second class that I call ANIMALIAN. This includes anything
that's hairy, scaly, moves on four legs, or has wings. The third
class of aliens exhibited a mechanical nature that could best be
called ROBOTIC. Though a robotlike walk would not be suffi
cient to place an entity in this category, a square head would.
The fourth class of aliens I call EXOTIC. This tends to be a
catchall class and includes any entity that is nonhumanoid,
nonanimalian, and nonrobotic.
Within the class of humanoids, I then distinguished five
types of entities. The first type, the "HUMAN," includes all
alleged extraterrestrials who would be indistinguishable in a
crowd of people on, let's say, the streets of Manhattan, but are
reported in the vicinity of, emerging from, or seen in a UFO.
These alleged aliens are all but indistinguishable from ordinary
humans. However, these extraterrestrials should not be confused
with actual humans that UFO abductees often report being on
board the craft with them.
Among these human look-alikes, I found six major variants.
The most prevalent are the six feet and taller, blue-eyed "beau
tiful people," often with shoulder-length blond hair. They are
commonly referred to in the UFO literature as "Nordics."
Another variant are the extraterrestrials who resemble humans
but who apparently require a space suit and helmet of some kind
in our world. Then there are the human-looking entities with
highly wrinkled faces who are often referred to as "Elders."
Three other less common variants are also noted.
The second major type of humanoids are SHORT GRAYS.
I have given these entities their own type simply because there
are so many reports of encounters with them. But, as I've
already pointed out, even within this popular type there are
noticeable variants. Some require helmets or some type of
breathing apparatus, for instance, while others have a slightly
more insectoid-looking face than your standard off-the-UFO Gray.
Short humanoids that did not fit the standard Gray mold
14
constitute the third major type of humanoids. I call this type
SHORT NON-GRAYS. Variants here include actual "little
green men"; short humanoids with pitted faces, of which there
Ilave been quite a few reports; an extremely hairy short
humanoid who notably seemed more human than animal; as
well as some three-inch-high entities that, despite their stature,
were also clearly humanoid.
Extremely tall or GIANT entities are the fourth type of
humanoid. One variant here is a ten-foot being with three eyes;
.mother is a Cyclops. Humanoids with the standard complement
of eyes but standing more than 8 feet tall are also included in this
alien type.
The fifth type of humanoid, which I call NONCLASSIC, is
a catchall for all remaining humanoids. The variants here
include a solid black form, a mummylike being, and an entity
with no hands, among others.
The second class of aliens, animalian, consists of five distinct
types of aliens. It should be noted, however, that despite their
animal-like appearance, the behavior and demeanor of these
aliens is usually more human than animal.
The first of these types, HAIRY MAMALIAN, distinguish
es itself from the humanoids by hair that covers the creature's
entire body, or at least all that is visible of it. These maybe tall
bigfoot-like creatures, animals with four legs, or entities with
batlike faces.
The second type, REPTILIAN, includes green, scaly entities
with snoutlike faces and large oval eyes, silvery goblins, and
swamp-type creatures. The type name refers only to the crea
ture's hairless skin and general appearance.
The third type, AMPHIBIAN, is reserved for froglike enti
ties. This type name refers only to the creatures' smooth skin and
has nothing to do, at least as far as I'm aware, with matters
aquatic.
The fourth type is INSECTOID and includes all insectlike
beings with long spindly limbs and large multifaceted eyes.
Variants of this type include any creature with rounded wings,
which others may call fairies, as well as those resembling a
grasshopper or praying mantis.
The fifth type in the animalian class is the AVIAN. These are
simply creatures with birdlike wings. There are few reports of
this type and only a single variety is noted.
In the robotic class I distinguish between two types of
aliens. The first is the METALLIC, consisting of robots that look
IS
entirely like tin cans or slabs of metal. The second type of robot
I call FLESHY, and by this I mean androidlike beings that dis
play features of living beings either human or animal. Robots
with either humanlike arms or legs, for instance, or displaying
in part the scaly skin of a reptile would be entities of the fleshy
robotic type.
The fourth class of aliens I call exotic. These come in two
types. One is the APPARITIONAL and includes ghostlike enti
ties and nonhumanoid creatures that are only partially formed
and look as if they exist at least in part in another dimension.
The other exotic type I term PHYSICAL. This is really a catchall
category and includes such variants as an entity in the shape of
a brain and a bloblike thing.
This alien classification system is meant as a general guide
line only. The classes, types, and variants are not intended to be
straitjackets. Some entities could be placed in more than one of
these categories. There are obviously many transitional forms,
humanoids that act like robots and hairy humanoids that resem
ble animals, for instance. I am amenable to making category
adjustments in future editions of this volume, given additional
information on any single descriptive case or suggestions for a
better, more encompassing, more accurate extraterrestrial
typology.
ClassificationTable
CLASS TYPE VARIANT
Humanoid "Human" 6
Humanoid Short Gray 3
Humanoid Short Non-Gray 8
Humanoid Giant 4
Humanoid Nonclassic 4
Robotic Metallic 3
Robotic Fleshy 4
Exotic Physical 2
Exotic Apparitional 2
16
H U M A N O ID
I ... .......
CLASS: Humanoid DESCRIPTIVE INCIDENT
TYPE: “Human" DATE: Summer 1975
VARIANT: 1, aka ' Nordic" L OCATION : La Junta, Colorado
DISTINGUISHING CHARACTERISTIC: WITNESS: Jamie W.
blond hair
At about eight o'clock in the morning the sky was vivid blue
with not a cloud in sight. Jamie W. and husband were driving
their Volkswagen from Boulder back to Lamar, Colorado, where
they lived. No one else was on the highway. Suddenly they saw
something off to the left of the road. About 350 feet up in the air
was an elongated donut-shaped object—they could actually see
the sky through the center of it. Its size was on the order of half
a football field, and it had a highly polished metallic look.
The couple pulled their car over to the side of the road but
couldn't get any closer to the object because of a barbed-wire
fence. They sat there watching it for 30 to 45 minutes. Jamie got
the impression that whatever they were watching was watching
them back. So she mentally greeted them, saying, "My name is
Jamie. Welcome to our planet." Then suddenly three or four lit
tle white clouds popped in from the east, traveling west, fol
lowed by a huge cloud that moved in front of and covered the
metallic object. When this cloud moved on, the object with a
hole in the center was gone. They then started the car and
resumed their trip to Lamar, but strangely, Jamie, who was nor
mally hyperactive, now felt unusually calm and peaceful.
Years later, during a hypnosis session, Jamie revealed that as
soon as she had seen the object she had wanted to run to it.
Though her husband had told her to stay in the car, she remem
bered suddenly being inside the object, where she was greeted
by two beings, one male, the other female. They looked very
"Scandinavian." They were tall, about six and a half feet, thin,
and beautiful. Their hair was long and blond and so were their
eyelashes. Jamie noted that their skin was so white it was almost
translucent. Both wore blue jumpsuits. The male entity wore a
silver belt.
Jamie did not want to leave the ship but was told that she
must go back. Suddenly she found herself in the car again, deter
mined to pass on their message of peace.
18
CLASS: Humanoid DESCRIPTIVE INCIDENT
TYPE: " Human" DATE: December 3,1967
VARIANT: 2, aka “Elder " ; LOCATION: Ashland,Nebraska
DISTINGUISHING CHARACTERISTIC: WITNESS: Herbert Schirmer
wrinkled face
20
with Schirmer and explained that they came from another
galaxy but had bases on other planets in the solar system. They
were contacting earthlings to prepare them for eventual open
contact, to prevent them from destroying Earth, and also to confuse
them.
Schirmer was then led back to his patrol car and told to forget
the experience. This story was the only abduction episode
investigated by the Condon Committee, the official UFO study
funded by the U.S. Air Force and conducted at the University of
Colorado in the late 1960s.
SOURCE: Ralph and Judy Blum, Beyond Earth: Man's Contact w ith UFOs
(New York: Bantam, 1974).
CLASS: Humanoid DESCRIPTIVE INCIDENT
TYPE: "Human" DATE: July 4,1947
VARIANT: 3 LOCATION: Roswell, New Mexico
DISTINGUISHING CHARACTERISTIC: W. Curry Holden,
WITNESSES:
bald head an unnamed nurse, and others
22
with tiny lobes. Their mouths were lipless and thin. And instead
of teeth, they had what looked like rawhide strips in theirm ouths.
She didn't notice any clothes. But she was struck by their
arms. Unlike human arms, the distance between their wrist and
elbow was greater than between their elbow and shoulder. She
saw only four long slender fingers on their hands. And the ends of
their fingers had little hollow pads that looked like suction cups.
Feeling nauseous, the nurse finally left the examination rom .
Soon after, the doctors exited as well. After hearing this
story, the mortician never saw the nurse again. Though the
details of this case vary somewhat from witness to witness,
including the descriptions of the aliens, it is viewed by many
UFO researchers as perhaps the most important UFO case of all
time .
SOURCE: Kevin D. Randle and Donald R. Schmitt, The Truth About the UFO
Crash at Roswell (New York: M. Evans, 1994).
CLASS: Humanoid DESCRIPTIVE INCIDENT
TYPE: "Human" DATE: November 1, 1954
VARIANT: 4 LOCATION: Cennina, Arezzo, Italy
DISTINGUISHING CHARACTERISTIC: WITNESS: Rosa Lotti
teeth
SOURCE: Sergio Conti, “The Cennina Landing," Flying Saucer Review 18, no. 5
(September-October 1972): pp. 11-15.
24
CLASS: Humanoid DESCRIPTIVEINCIDENT
TYPE: "Human" DATE: August 28, 1972
VARIANT: 5, aka "Easter Island" head LOCATION: Bahia Blanca, Buenos
DISTINGUISHINGCHARACTERISTIC: Aires, Argentina
long chin WITNESS: Eduardo Fernando Dedeu
26
t 6.5ft.
CLASS: Humanoid DESCRIPTIVE INCIDENT
TYPE: “Human" DATE: October 15, 1957
VARIANT: 6 LOCATION: Sao Francisco de Sales,
DISTINGUISHINGCHARACTERISTIC: Minas Gerais, Brazil
space suit WITNESSES: Antonio Villas-Boas
28
came in and departed with the woman. But before she left she
pointed to her belly, smiled, and pointed at the sky. When his
clothes were brought in, Villas-Boas dressed and was given a
tour of the craft. Afterward the beings showed him a metal lad
der and signaled that he go down it. Villas-Boas observed the
craft lake off. It was 5:30 in the morning.
SOURCE: Coral and Jim Lorenzen, Flying Saucer Occupants (New York: Signet,
1967) .
CLASS: Humanoid DESCRIPTIVE INCIDENT
TYPE: Short Gray DATE: September 19, 1961
VARIANT: 1, Classic LOCATION: Lancaster, New Hampshire
DISTINGUISHING CHARACTERISTIC: WITNESSES: Betty and Barney Hill
black, wrap-around eyes
30
leader wore a cap and black scarf over the shoulder.
These men led the Hills out of the car, floated them up the
ramp of the waiting craft, and ushered them into a room where
each underwent a type of medical examination. They took sam
ples of Betty's skin and inserted a long needle into her navel.
When she asked them where they came from, the being she
thought was the leader showed her an oblong map depicting
stars and explained that the lines connecting them represented
trade routes. An amateur astronomer later speculated that
Betty's reconstruction of this map seemed to correspond to the
stars of Zeta Reticulii.
The Hills were told to forget what they had seen and then
led back to their car to continue their journey. This was the first
UFO abduction case to get widespread publicity.
SOURCE: John G. Fuller, The Interrupted Journey (New York: Dial Press, 1966).
CLASS: Humanoid DESCRIPTIVEINCIDENT
TYPE: Short Gray DATE: August 26, 1972
VARIANT: 2 LOCATION: Allagash Waterway,
DISTINGUISHINGCHARACTERISTIC: Maine
turtlelike lower half offace WITNESSES: Jim and Jack Weiner,
Charlie Fotz, and Chuck Rak
32
Humanoid
CLASS: DESCRIPTIVEINCIDENT
TYPE: Short Gray DATE: May 15, 1951 ::
VARIANT: 3 LOCATION: Salzburg, Austria
DISTINGUISHING CHARACTERISTIC: WITNESS: Anonymous
helmet and "fly" eyes
SOURCE: Richard Hall, Ted Bloecher, and Isabel Davis, UFOs: A New Look
(Washington, D.C.: NICAP, 1969).
36
CLASS: Humanoid DESCRIPTIVE INCIDENT
TYPE: Short Non-Gray DATE: August 14, 1947
VARIANT: 2, aka "Green Man " LOCATION: Villa Santina, Italy
DISTINGUISHING CHARACTERISTIC: WITNESS: Rapuzzi Johannis
38
CLASS: Humanoid DESCRIPTIVE INCIDENT
TYPE: Short Non-Gray DATE: July 31, 1968
VARIANT: 3, aka “Michelin Man " LOCATION: La Plaine des Cafres,
DISTINGUISHING CHARACTERISTIC: Reunion Island (Indian Ocean)
space suit WITNESS: Luce Fontaine
40
CLASS: Humanoid DESCRIPTIVE INCIDENT
TYPE: Short Non-Gray DATE: February 24, 1977
variant: 4 LOCATION: Langenargen, Baden-
DISTINGUISHINGCHARACTERISTIC: Wurttemberg, Germany
oval head and mouth WITNESS: Lothar Schaefler
42
that the episode could not be explained as due to alcohol deliri
um Schaefler suffered from insomnia in the weeks following the
encounter, vomited several times at work, and developed a
stomach ulcer.
Several other bar patrons reported seeing the object that
night, and seven years later, the Italian Defense Ministry report
t hat an Italian fighter plane had been followed by a UFO for
[many] minutes that night as well. Others explained the bright light
seen that night as a meteor.
44
soldier, mostly about weapons, which was conducted entirely
hand gestures and drawings. Da Silva also understood that they
wanted him to help in their relations with humans. When the
soldier refused, the dwarf snatched the crucifix from the rosary
Da Silva always carried with him. As the soldier began praying,
g h o stlike figure appeared to him, making revelations.
Shortly afterward, Da Silva was returned to Earth. As the
machine landed, he lost consciousness and woke up near the
town of Vitoria, about 250 miles from where he had been fishing.
H e had a swollen knee and three open wounds on his shoulde
r. where the helmet had rubbed against his skin. He had been
away four and a half days.
SO
URCE: Hulvio Brant Aleixo. "Abduction at Bebedouro," in Encounter Cases
from Flying Saucer Review, ed., Charles Bowen (New York: Signet,
1977), pp. 175-196.
CLASS: Humanoid DESCRIPTIVE INCIDENT
TYPE: Short Non-Gray DATE: July 25, 1979
VARIANT: 6 LOCATION; Turis, Valencia, Spain
DISTINGUISHINGCHARACTERISTIC: WITNESS: Federico Ibanez
"eye s " :and feet
46
1 Oft
CLASS: Humanoid DESCRIPTIVE INCIDENT
TYPE: Short Non-Gray DATE: January 7, 1970
VARIANT: 7 LOCATION: Imjarvi,Mikkeli, Finland
DISTINGUISHINGCHARACTERISTIC: WITNESSES: Esko Viljo and
hook nose and cone helmet Aarno Heinonen
48
culty breathing, body pains, vomiting, loss of memory, and urine
w
as black as coffee. He continued to feel ill for months.
Viljo also had been physically affected. His face became
swollen and red an hour after the encounter, and he later had
difficultly with his balance, suffered a headache, and felt pain in
his eyes. The doctor who examined both men believed that they
had suffered a great shock. Their symptoms resembled those of
radiation exposure. A reporter later located two independent
witnesses who had seen a strange light in the sky late that day.
Heinonen went on to have many more UFO experiences in
the years that followed and eventually became a "contactee."
SOURCE: Sven-Olof Fredrickson, “A Humanoid Was Seen at Imjarvi," Flying
Saucer Review 16, no. 5, (September-October 1970): pp. 14-18. Anders
Liljegren, "The Continuing Story of the Imjarvi Skiers," parts 1 and 2,
Flying Saucer Review 26, no. 3, (September 1980): pp. 15-17; 26, no.
5, (January 1981): pp. 18-20.
CLASS: H u m a n o id DESCRIPTIVE INCIDENT
TYPE: S h o r t N o n -G r a y DATE: A u g u s t 19, 1 9 7 0
VARIANT: 8 LOCATION: B u k it M e r ta ja m ,
DISTINGUISHINGCHARACTERISTIC: P e n a n g , M a la y s ia
e x tr e m e ly s m a l l s ta tu r e WITNESSES: M o h a m a d Z u lk ifli, A b d u l
R a h im , D a v id Tan, S u la im a n , K.
W ig n esw a ra n , a n d M o h a m e d A l i
SOURCE: "Very Little Men!" (drawn from original newspaper reports). Flying
Saucer Review 6, no. 6 (November-December 1970): pp. 29-30.
Ahmand Jamaludin, “A Wave of Small Humanoids in Malaysia in
1970," Flying Saucer Review 28, no. 5 (June 1983): pp 24—27.
50
CLASS: Humanoid DESCRIPTIVEINCIDENT
TYPE: Giant DATE: September 27, 1989
VARIANT: 1 LOCATION: Voronezh. Russia
DISTINGUISHINGCHARACTERISTIC: WITNESSES: Vasya Surin, Genya
three eyes Blinov, Julia Sholokhova, and
40 adults
52
CLASS: Humanoid DESCRIPTIVEINCIDENT
TYPE: Giant DATE: August 28, 1963
VARIANT: 2, aka "Cyclops " LOCATION: Belo Horizonte, Minas
DISTINGUISHING CHARACTERISTIC: Gerais, Brazil
one eye WITNESSES: Fernando and Ronaldo
Eustaquio Gualberto and
Jose Marcos Gomes Vidal
After dinner at about 7:30 p.m ., the three boys went out into
the garden to wash out a coffee percolator with water from a
drum that stood by the well. The Moon was out and the garden
was brightly illuminated. As Jose Marcos, the seven-year-old
from across the street, lowered his head into the tank to scoop
up water with a bowl, Ronaldo, seven, and his brother
Fernando, 12, noticed that the bright light actually came from a
spherical object about 10 feet wide that was hovering just over
the pear tree in front of their house. The sphere was divided into
squares and had three antennalike rods sticking out from the
top.
Through its transparent walls, the boys could see four
beings, all wearing what appeared to be divers' suits and clear
helmets. They were seated on one-legged stools. One of the
beings appeared to be female, judging from the long, pulled-back
blond hair; the others, all bald, were apparently male.
Suddenly, one of the men, who seemed about 10 feet tall,
floated down to the ground between two parallel shafts of yel
low light shining from the underside of the sphere. Through his
transparent helmet, which had a hoop-shaped antenna on top
and a small round ball hanging from it, the boys could see that
the being had only one large round all-dark eye. Above this fre
quently moving eye was a dark protuberant area that resembled
an eyebrow. The being's face had a reddish tint. The rest of his
body was covered with a leatherlike uniform that seemed wrin
kled at the limbs and chest. It was brown up top, white below
the waist, and black from the knees down. These were appar
ently boots.
With a measured step, the enormous being headed toward
Jose Marcos, who had his head in the water drum. Seeing a
threat, Fernando jumped on Jose Marcos and threw him on the
ground in an effort to protect him. The being then looked at the
boys, who now felt powerless to flee or shout, and began speak
ing strange words and gesturing with his hands and head.
54
When the being moved to sit down on the edge of the well,
Fer n ando ran behind the entity, picked up a chipped brick, and
raised it to throw at him. Suddenly the giant jumped up, and a
beam of yellow light emerged from the rectangular area at the
level of his chest and struck Fernando's hand, causing him to
drop the brick. The being, who had a copper-colored box on his
back, again began speaking in a loud voice, apparently trying to
make himself understood.
Finally the being gave up and floated back into the sphere,
which then brightened, rose silently, and vanished from sight.
The boys then ran into the house and reported the encounter to
their mother. Jose Marcos crawled under a bed. The father later
found small triangular marks about three inches deep along the
path where the boys said the mysterious being had walked.
SOURCE: Gordon Creighton, "The 'One-Eyed Entities’ of Belo Horizonte, " Flying
Saucer Review, special issue no. 3 (September 1969): pp. 28-32.
CLASS: Humanoid DESCRIPTIVE INCIDENT
TYPE: Giant DATE: September 12, 1952
VACANT: 3 LOCATION: Flatwoods, West Virginia
DISTINGUISHING CHARACTERISTIC: WITNESSES: Kathleen, Eddie, andFred
headpiece and claws May; Gene Lemon; Neil Nunley;
Ronnie Shaver; and Tommy Hyer
SOURCE: Coral and Jim Lorenzen, Flying Saucer Occupants (New York: Signet,
1967) .
56
CLASS: H u m a n o id DESCRIPTIVEINCIDENT
TYPE: G ia n t DATE: May29, 1986
VARIANT: 4 LOCATION: S a n ta R o sa , L a P a m p a ,
DISTINGUISHINGCHARACTERISTIC: A r g e n tin a
lo n g h a n d s : WITNESS: O scar Alberto Flores
58
CLASS: Humanoid DESCRIPTIVE INCIDENT
TYPE: Nonclassic DATE:October 11, 1973,
VARIANT: 1, aka “Mummy" LOCATION: Pascagoula, Mississippi
DISTINGUISHING CHARACTERISTIC: WITNESSES: Charles Hickson and
elephant skin and h e a d "points" Calvin Parker
60
legs collapsed when he touched the ground. Parker stood by
with a terrified look on his face.
Meanwhile the buzzing sound and blue light resumed, and
the craft rose straight up and disappeared almost instantly.
Hickson "heard" a message in his mind that the beings were
peaceful. Though the two witnesses knew they would be
ridiculed, they nevertheless told their story to the police.
62
Kelly experienced a series of dreams about the encounter. In
one she saw the being leaning over her as if he was about to kiss
her navel. The creature was tall, had a larger-than-normal head,
long thin arms, a bulging abdomen, and skin like gray-black
plastic. "The creature was black," said Kelly, "but not the color
black. It was as if someone had cut a hole in matter where he
stood or as if he himself was a hole in space." The independent
witnesses in the other car have confirmed Kelly's description of
the object and the beings—except that they did not recall the
creature's red eyes.
A similar all-black being with long arms was seen in
Leicester, England, in the summer of 1928.
SOURCE: Bill Chalker, “An Extraordinary Encounter in the Dandenong Foothills, "
International UFO Reporter 19, no. 5, (September-October 1994): pp.
4-8, 18-20.
CLASS: Humanoid DESCRIPTIVE INCIDENT
TYPE: Nonclassic DATE: October 25, 1974
VARIANT: 3 LOCATION: Rawlins, Wyoming
DISTINGUISHINGCHARACTERISTIC: WITNESS: Carl Higdon
lack of hands
The witness, an oil driller in his early forties, was elk hunt
ing on the northern boundary of the Medicine Bow National
Forest when he spotted five elk and fired at the bull. But the bul
let "went only about 50 feet and dropped" as if it had struck a
wall. When Higdon heard a twig snap, he turned to see a
humanlike figure in the shadow of a nearby tree.
The "man" was bowlegged, stood about six feet two and
weighed about 180 pounds. He wore a black suit and black
shoes. One belt crossed his breast; another his waist. The waist
belt had a star at the buckle and a yellow emblem on an apron
like flap beneath it. His face was nearly human but was sloped
and without a chin. The nose was flat, the brows were hairless,
and the ears were not visible. His mouth showed but six teeth,
three above and three below. The hair on his head was thin and
stood up like straw. Higdon saw no hands on the "man," but his
right arm ended in a cone-shaped device, which Higdon called a
gun.
The "man" called himself Ausso and offered Higdon a pack
et of four pills. Ausso claimed they satisfied one's hunger for four
days. Higdon took one, though ordinarily he never even took
aspirin. Ausso then invited Higdon to come along and he accept
ed. When Ausso pointed his right arm, Higdon suddenly found
himself inside a transparent cubicle, strapped to a chair and
wearing a helmet. In the cubicle were four seats, a mirror, a con
trol panel, another being like Ausso, and the five elk frozen still
in a kind of cage behind him.
When Ausso pointed his arm at the controls, the cubicle
began moving and Higdon saw Earth receding below him.
Moments later they landed on a dark planet that Ausso said was
163,000 light years away. Outside the cubicle was a huge tower
with a bright rotating light, making a sound like an electric razor.
Standing in the nearby plaza were what looked like five humans
in conversation—two blond teenage girls, one teenage boy, a
slightly younger girl, and a gray-haired man of 40 or 50.
When Ausso pointed his arm again, Higdon found himself
64
inside a room in the tower. A shieldlike device came out of the
wall in front of Higdon for several minutes, then retracted. At
the end of this examination, Ausso told Higdon he was not what
they needed and would be taken back. Ausso returned Higdon's
rifle regretfully and floated the remaining pills out of his pocket.
Higdon then found himself standing on a rocky slope back
on Earth, where he fell and injured himself. About two and a
half hours had passed. He found his truck in a place where the
terrain was too rough for him to drive into or out of. He called
for help on his CB. The rescue party found Higdon disoriented
and confused, and his truck had to be towed out. He began relat
ing this episode while in the hospital.
A nearly identical armed being was observed by an eight-
year-old boy in Wales in July of 1976.
66
A N IM A L IA N
CLASS:A n im a li an DESCRIPTIVE INCIDENT
TYPE: H a i r y M a m m a lia n : DATE: O cto b er 2 5 , 1971
VARIANT: 1, a k a "B igfoot" LOCATION: Greensburg, Pennsylvania
DISTINGUISHING CHARACTERISTIC: WITNESSES: S te p h e n P u la s k i a n d
ta l l s ta tu r e tw o 1 0 -y e a r -o ld c h ild re n
70
Pulaski, a six-foot-two, 250-pound man, went into a fugue,
breathing heavily, growling, and flailing his arms. The group
decided to leave the scene after Pulaski came out of his confused
state, and the smell of sulfur or some other chemical began to
permeate the area.
A psychiatrist who later examined Pulaski found no evi
dence of dishonesty, sociopathic behavior, or drug or alcohol use,
either in connection with this incident or previously in his life.
SOURCE: Berthold Schwartz, UFO Dynamics (Moore Haven, Fla: Rainbow Books,
1983).
CLASS: A nimalian DESCRIPTIVE INCIDENT
TYPE: Hairy Mammalian DATE: October 27, 1974
VARIANT: 2 LOCATION: Aveley, Essex, England
DISTINGUISHINGCHARACTERISTIC: WITNESSES: John and Sue Day and
pointed ears their children, Kevin, Karen, and Stuart
72
about half a mile from where they had been abducted. The fam
ily members reportedly underwent some major personality
changes in the months following their encounter.
SOURCE: Andrew Collins, “The Aveley Abduction," Flying Saucer Review 23,
no. 6 (April 1978): pp. 13-25; 24, no. 1 (June 1978): pp. 5-15.
CLASS: Animalian DESCRIPTIVE INCIDENT
TYPE: Hairy Mammalian DATE: November28, 1954
VARIANT: 3 LOCATION: Caracas, Venezuela
DISTINGUISHING CHARACTERISTIC: WITNESSES: Gustavo Gonzales
stiff bristly hair and Jose Ponce
74
C LASS : A n i m a l i a n D ES C R IP T IV E IN C ID E N T
T Y P E : H a ir y M a m m a l i a n D A T E :' J a n u a r y 1 9 5 8
VARIANT: 4 LO C A T IO N : N ia g a ra Falls, N e w York
D IS T IN G U IS H IN G C H A R A C T ER IS T IC : W IT N ES S : A n o n y m o u s
f r o n t fe e le r a r m s a n d t a i l
76
CLASS: Animalian DESCRIPTIVE INCIDENT
TYPE: Hairy Mammalian DATE: Early December 1974
VARIANT: 5 LOCATION: Frederic, Wisconsin
DISTINGUISHING CHARACTERISTIC: WITNESS: William Bosak
calflike ears
SOURCE: Jerome Clark, “The Frightened Creature on County Road W," Flying
Saucer Review 21, no. I (June 1975): pp. 20-21.
78
CLASS: Animalian DESCRIPTIVE INCIDENT
TYPE: Reptilian DATE: December 6, 1978
VARIANT: 1, aka “Swamp Creature" LOCATION: Marzano, Genoa, Italy
DISTINGUISHINGCHARACTERISTIC: WITNESS: Fortunate Zanfretta
“spines" on head
80
CLASS: Animalian DESCRIPTIVE INCIDENT
TYPE: Reptilian DATE: July 1983
VARIANT: 2, aka “Lizard Man " : LOCATION: Mount Vernon, Missouri
DISTINGUISHINGCHARACTERISTIC: WITNESSES: Ron and Paula Watson
webbedfeet and hands
82
CLASS: Animation DESCRIPTIVE INCIDENT
TYPE: Reptilian DATE: August 21, 1955
VARIANT: 3. aka "Goblin" LOCATION: Kelly, Kentucky
DISTINGUISHING CHARACTERISTIC: WITNESSES: Billy Ray Taylor, Lucky
large hands with talons Sutton, and the Sutton family
84
hour before sunrise. That morning investigators returned but
again found nothing.
Andrew Ledwith, an engineer with the local radio station,
interviewed the family immediately. They gave him almost iden
tical stories and exactly the same descriptions of the creatures.
Though the family was soon inundated by the media, they never
exploited their story, never tried to rationalize it, and never
recanted it.
SOURCE: J. Allen Hynek, The UFO Experience (Chicago: Henry Regnery, 1972);
and Ronald Story, ed., The Encyclopedia of UFOs (New York:
Doubleday, 1980).
CLASS: Animalian DESCRIPTIVEINCIDENT
TYPE: Amphibian DATE: September 24, 1951
VARIANT: 1 LOCATION: Orland Park, Illinois
DISTINGUISHING CHARACTERISTIC: WITNESS: Harrison E. Bailey
striped skin
86
manner. They had dark round shells one inch in diameter.
Bailey was running to try to escape this alien horde when he
came across the bus-size object just off the road. He remembered
awakening inside the craft and speculated that the froglike crea
tures must have bit him or otherwise put him to sleep. Two
beings, each five feet tall, then approached Bailey inside the ship.
He avoided looking at them too closely but recalled seeing flat
tened and bizarre features beneath their tinted shields. Before
being released, Bailey was given a message telepathically: They
meant no harm and desired to land and communicate with
humankind. They also wanted him to be a spokesman for them.
Bailey would again be visited by these aliens in 1977 and 1978.
SOURCE: Ann Druffel, “Harrison Bailey and the 'Flying Saucer Disease,'" in UFO
Abductions, ed„ D. Scott Rogo (New York: Signet, 1980), pp. 122-137.
C LA S S : A n im a lia n DESCRIPTIVE INCIDENT
TYPE: Amphibian DATE: January 25, 1967
VARIANT: 2 LOCATION: South Ashburnham,
DISTINGUISHING CHARACTERISTIC: Massachusetts
eyes on stalks WITNESSES: Betty Andreasson
It began at 6:35 p.m . with the house lights going out briefly.
Betty was in the kitchen, while her seven children and her
mother and father were in the living room. She noticed a puls
ing orange light streaming in the kitchen window and went in to
calm the children. She then returned to the window with her
father, and they both saw five strange-looking creatures leaping
like grasshoppers toward the house. As the beings passed
through the wooden door, everyone in the family blacked out
except Betty.
What transpired afterward emerged under hypnosis several
years later. The alien leader, who was the tallest, spoke to Betty
telepathically and identified himself as Quazga. All the beings
were about four feet tall, wore blue coveralls, and had pear-
shaped heads and wraparound catlike eyes. Their sleeves dis
played an insignia of a bird.
When Betty expressed concern for her family, they released
her 11-year-old daughter, Becky, from unawareness, and one of
the beings began playing with her, juggling balls of light. Betty
gave Quazga a Bible, and he handed her a blue book. Then Betty
was taken aboard a large, saucer-shaped object with a central
superstructure. The object rested on the hillside in her backyard.
The craft then took off and merged with a larger craft, where
Betty was subjected to probing with a variety of instruments,
including one she called a cleaning device. During the medical
examination that followed, the beings stuck a needlelike device
up her nostril and later in her navel to test for procreation.
Afterward Betty put her clothes back on and was led to an
enclosed glasslike chair where she sat for a while immersed in a
liquid. She was then given something sweet to drink and led by
two beings in silvery luminous suits with black hoods into a dark
tunnel seemingly chipped out of stone. Together they went
through a mirrorlike door and came out into a place with a
vibrating red atmosphere. The black track they were following
went between two square buildings with windowlike openings.
Suddenly Betty was frightened by a different set of beings
88
that crawled over the buildings. They were climbing up and
down and in and out of the windows like monkeys. She
described them as lemurlike creatures with full bodies but skin
ny arms and legs. The creatures were headless, however, though
they had eyes on stalks that emerged from the top of their bod
ies. The stalks moved independently of one another and fol
lowed Betty and her companions as they glided by.
Shortly afterward, they entered a green realm full of plant
life and water. Later, after seeing a gigantic bird turn to ashes in
a phoenixlike fashion, Betty was returned home at 10:44 p. m .
She interpreted the experience—one of many, it later turned
out—as being angelic in nature.
90
Later, inside one of the craft, Shea was put on a table and exam
ined. Samples of various kinds were collected from his body.
92
picking up and putting down cassette tapes and other things. It
was as if the pointed ends of their arms were magnetic.
Finally the beings sailed out the back door, which had
remained open the whole time, and into their spaceship, which
measured eight feet long and four feet high. It had glowing port
holes around it and a scorpionlike tail at the back with an aerial
wheel on top. The object took off and headed north.
Immediately afterward Hingley fell to the carpet in pain and
only later was able to call her husband, her neighbors, and the
police. An examination of the landing spot in the snow-covered
garden revealed two parallel lines, each an inch wide, traversed
by a series of lines like a caterpillar track. Her clock, TV, and radio
ceased to work properly, and the cassette tapes the beings had
handled were distorted and ruined. Hingley had sore eyes for a
week after the encounter and a red mark on her forehead that
persisted for months.
CLASS: Anim alian DESCRIPTIVE INCIDENT
TYPE: Avian DATE: November 16, 1963
VARIANT: 1, a k a "Mothman" LOCATION: Hythe, Kent, England
DISTINGUISHING CHARACTERISTIC: WITNESSES: Joh n Flaxton, Mervyn
headless Hutchinson, an d two others
94
R O B O T IC
CLASS: Robotic DESCRIPTIVE INCIDENT
TYPE: Metallic DATE: November 9, 1979
VARIANT: 1, aka “Mines" LOCATION: Livingston, Lothian,
DISTINGUISHING CHARACTERISTIC: Scotland
spikes WITNESS: Bob Taylor
98
CLASS: Robotic DESCRIPTIVE INCIDENT
TYPE: Metallic DATE: October 23, 1965
VARIANT: 2, aka "Tin Can
"
s LOCATION: Long Prairie,
DISTINGUISHING CHARACTERISTIC: Minnesota
fins WITNESS: Jerry Townsend
100
CLASS: Robotic DESCRIPTIVEINCIDENT
TYPE: Metallic DATE: January 27,1977 :
VARIANT: 3, aka "Slabs" :L O C A T IO N : K entucky
DISTINGUISHINGCHARACTERISTIC: WITNESS: Lee Parrish
one-jointed arm
102
would one day contact him again. The investigators were con
vinced of the witness's sincerity.
Similar "rectangular crewmembers" had been reported
before; some had been seen during an early morning UFO
encounter in Brazil in September of 1968.
Oft
CLASS: R o b o tic ; DESCRIPTIVE INCIDENT
TYPE: F lesh y DATE: S e p te m b e r 10, 1 9 5 4
VARIANT: 1 LOCATION: Q u a ro u b le , N o rd ,
DISTINGUISHING CHARACTERISTIC: F ra n ce
h u m a n l ik e legs WITNESS: M a r iu s D e w ild e
104
C LA SS: R o b o tic D ES C R IP T IV E IN C ID E N T
T Y P E : F lesh y D A T E : Dece m b e r 1 6, 1 9 5 7 ;
V A R IA N T : 2 LO C A T IO N : O ld Saybrook, Connectic
t
u
D IS T IN G U IS H IN G C H A R A C T ER IS T IC : W IT N E S S : M a r y S ta r r
squ are h ead
106
CLASS: Robotic DESCRIPTIVE INCIDENT
TYPE: Fleshy DATE: September 15, 1977
VARIANT: 3 LOCATION: Paciencia,
DISTINGUISHING CHARACTERISTIC: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
pedestal WITNESS: Antonio La Rubia
108
Rubia looked around, the being vanished and La Rubia looked
up to see a huge, lead-colored balloon receding in the sky above
him. It was 2:55 in the morning. Over the next month, the wit
ness suffered from nausea, diarrhea, fever, and a burning and
itching so severe that he was unable to work.
The witness claims he was flying a Piper Cub when his light
aircraft was struck by a pulsating lozenge-shaped UFO. As
Reagan, who had no parachute, and his wrecked aircraft were
falling through the air, he began to feel like he was being drawn
upward by what he described as a "sticky, clinging force." The
next thing he knew he was drawn into the UFO.
Inside, Reagan found himself in the presence of small glis
tening beings. He described them as about three feet tall and
looking like "huge stalks of metallic asparagus." The beings
somehow spoke to him in English and apologized for the acci
dent. They then gave him a medical examination, found that he
had cancer, and removed it in exchange for the trouble they had
caused him. The beings subsequently deposited Reagan, uncon
scious but without a single bruise, in a farmer's field near the
wreckage of his aircraft. It should be noted that, after falling sev
eral thousand feet, the engine had embedded itself six feet into
the ground.
Less than a year later, in May of 1952, Reagan died at the
Georgia State Asylum for the Insane. The cause of death, accord
ing to a news report was "degeneration of the brain tissue due to
extreme atomic radiation."
Reagan's bizarre story sat unpublished in the files of the edi
tor of the English journal Flying Saucer Review for more than a
decade. But while Reagan's account had seemed too preposter
ous and fantastic in the 1950s, by the late 1960s it had acquired
a rather prophetic ring, as it possessed many features that had
become rather commonplace in such accounts.
SOURCE: Gordon Creighton, "Healing from UFOs, " Flying Saucer Review 15,
no. 5 (September-October 1969): pp. 20-21.
110
E X O T IC
CLASS: Exotic DESCRIPTIVE INCIDENT
TYPE: Physical DATE: August 17 (or 31), 1971
VARIANT: 1 LOCATION: Palos Verdes Estates,
DISTINGUISHINGCHARACTERISTIC: California
“red spot" WITNESSES: "John Hodges” and
“Pete Rodriguez”
114
world because it had too much power, which was a reference to
atomic bombs. On a large television screen, Hodges was shown
different places on Earth highlighted with pinpoints of light,
indicating places where humans could destroy themselves.
Hodges was then shown a picture of a "dead" planet. Then he
heard a buzzing sound and suddenly he was sitting in his car
again.
Subsequently Hodges recalled having further encounters
during which the humanoids told him they were from Zeta
Reticulii and that the brainlike beings were "merely translators."
But the many inaccurate prophesies they had conveyed led
Hodges to conclude that the beings could not be trusted.
SOURCE: Ann Druffel, "Encounter on Dapple Gray Lane," in UFO Abductions,
ed., D. Scott Rogo (New York: Signet, 1980), pp. 160-182.
CLASS: Exotic DESCRIPTIVEINCIDENT
TYPE: Physical DATE: December 20, 1958
VARIANT: 2, aka "Blob" LOCATION: Domesten,
DISTINGUISHINGCHARACTERISTIC: Kristianstad, Sweden
jelly “form " WITNESSES: Stig Rydberg and
Hans Gustafsson
116
CLASS: Exotic DESCRIPTIVE INCIDENT
TYPE: Apparitional DATE: November 12,1976
VARIANT: 1, aka “ghost" LOCATION: Badajoz, Spain
DISTINGUISHINGCHARACTERISTIC: WITNESSES: Three unnamed
unformed appendages soldiers
SOURCE: Juan Jose Benitez, “Encounter at Talavera," Flying Saucer Review 23,
no. 5 (February 1978): pp. 3-5.
118
CLASS:Exotic DESCRIPTIVE INCIDENT
TYPE: Apparitional DATE: August 22, 1955
VARIANT: 2 LOCATION: Riverside, California
DISTINGUISHINGCHARACTERISTIC: WITNESSES: Kermit Douglas and
doubled appendages seven other children
120
AFTERWORD
TooHum
an?OrTooM
anyAliens?
You might doubt the extraterrestrial nature of many of the
creatures in this field guide, especially if they look too familiar to
you—too human, in other words. And you may be correct.
Some experts believe that extraterrestrials would not look like us
at all. Human physiology has evolved in response to a very nar
row set of constraints, they argue. If Earth had started out with
twice its present mass, humans would likely have developed
with a stronger skeleton that may have precluded bipedalism. If
the planet had started out with half its mass, our shape would
also have been radically altered. Similarly, if the inclination of
the equator had been 60 degrees instead of 23.5, or if our day
was 100 hours long instead of 24, we humans would look con
siderably different. So how, the skeptics ask, could we expect
creatures from a completely different planetary environment to
resemble us?
But other equally qualified people believe that life elsewhere
in the universe would indeed look very much like us. The late
Cyril Ponnamperuma, who headed the University of Maryland's
Laboratory of Chemical Evolution and was considered one of the
premier scientists studying the development of life from nonlife,
thought that the genetic code, which determines the appearance
and makeup of all living things, did not originate by chance. He
believed it evolved from a precise chemical interaction—one that
would occur under the same conditions anywhere in the uni
verse. "What this means," said Ponnamperuma, "is that extrater
restrial life is more likely to be chemically similar to life on this
planet." The chemistry of the compounds making up the genet
ic code seems to demand that all life be similar. In other words,
there's a natural tendency, like water running downhill, for the
genetic code to produce life as we know it.
Regardless of the preponderance of humanoids, if this field
guide is any indication of what's really out there, then we are
certainly blessed—or cursed, as the case may be—with an over
abundance of alien types. Taken at face value, one would have
to conclude that the universe is teeming with space-faring civi
lizations from different planets visiting Earth. Of course, there
really is no solid evidence that these UFO occupants are of
2
1
extraterrestrial origin, though they certainly seem to want to
give us that impression.
The descriptions of the aliens vary so greatly, in fact, that
some regard this as a clue to their real nature as a product of the
human imagination. Skeptics point out that there is almost as
much physical variation in the appearance of the aliens as there
are witnesses. While such a point of view may or may not be
correct, it certainly highlights the basic assumption we hold
about aliens: that they should have a consistent appearance. But
one has only to look at the incredible variety of life on our own
planet to see the flaw in this assumption.
The variety of life—even human life—on Earth is absolutely
stunning. "We might pause to consider for a moment," notes
Indiana folklorist Thomas Bullard in his unique study of abduc
tion cases, "how a delegation of humans might bewilder aliens if
we met them with representatives of our full diversity in age,
sex, size, race, way of life, and individual differences."
ThoseGrays
But is the alien variety real? Temple University historian and
abduction researcher David Jacobs thinks not. He believes the
various types of aliens are confabulations, that the witness
descriptions of the entities are for the most part mistaken. Jacobs
thinks that the Grays are the only genuine aliens, though he
does protect himself from the pitfalls of such a generalization by
adding that "even if the witnesses are seeing different beings, it
doesn't matter because they are all doing the same thing."
Jacobs sometimes distinguishes between two types of Grays.
Those that are four and a half to five feet tall and those that are
three to four feet tall. But despite some difference in appearance,
notes Jacobs, since their general morphology is similar, they are
probably of the same species. The beings have the standard com
plement of head, body, two hands, two arms, two legs, and two
feet. They differ from humans in that they have only three or
four fingers, no hair, no jaw, no ears other than a small hole on
each side of the head perhaps, and no nose, though again there
are reports of a ridge or holes where the nose would be. The
mouth of the Grays is a mere slit that is not used for communi
cation. Rarely does the mouth open, and when it does it fails to
reveal teeth. Communication, if there is any, takes place tele
phatically, though Grays are generally vague and evasive, if not
123
deliberately misleading—when responding to questions.
The eyes of the Grays are perhaps their most salient feature.
Abnormally large, black, opaque, and fixed, their eyes have no
whites, no eyebrows, no eyelashes, and no eyelids. Jacobs
believes the Grays use their eyes "to conduct mental procedures"
on the abductees. Biologists have pointed out that in nature
when a creature has very large eyes it is because their environ
mental light levels are low. Consequently researchers have spec
ulated that the short Grays must live in a world where there is
much less sunlight than on our Earth. Such creatures would also
have difficulties coping with our very bright sunlight, which
might be the reason that about 90 percent of all alien contact
cases take place at night.
The wrinkle-free faces of the Grays suggest to Jacobs that the
beings perhaps do not age or, if they do, then not as we know it.
Their skin is usually reported as gray, though not always, and
either rubbery or plasticlike and without pores, hair, or wrinkles.
The Grays' arms and legs seem to bend normally but are thin and
frail. And there is some disagreement among abductees on
whether or not their feet have toes.
Otherwise notable are features the Grays do not possess.
Their bodies show no muscular development, and they display
no visible bone structure such as ribs. Nor do they have hips,
waists, breasts, nipples, buttocks, rectums, or apparent genitals.
Though the differences between the sexes is not apparent among
the Grays, abductees feel they can identify the sexes of the beings.
Their narrow chests, combined with the fact that abductees
never report alien breath, bad or otherwise, even when they're
just an inch or two from the alien face, suggest a lack of lungs.
They are not air-breathing creatures, concludes Jacobs. Similarly,
their morphology suggests that the Grays do not ingest food
through their mouths for energy. There are no reports of an
Adam's apple in their thin necks, there is no paunch where their
stomach would be, and they appear to lack a rectum, all of
which suggests to Jacobs that the Grays do not eat, at least as we
know it.
Their thin tubular necks hardly seem capable of supporting
their large bulbuous craniums. The size of this cranium may be
telling. In biology, cranial size is used as a rough measurement of
brain development and intelligence. So perhaps the Grays are
possessed of a high intellectual capacity. In any case, they are
certainly sentient. They can make decisions, deal with crises, and
perform specialized tasks.
124
"The composite picture that emerges from the many
abductee accounts," writes Jacobs in Secret Life, "is of rational,
logical, goal-oriented aliens who perform a variety of clearly out
lined tasks with maximum efficiency in a detached, clinical man
ner. There is a hierarchical structure and a differentiation of
labor. They are focused on human physiology, neurology, and
reproduction. The aliens display very little sense of individuality.
Their outward appearance is almost always the same, given the
range of clothing types found. They volunteer no information
about themselves. Although once in a while more complicated
dialogue takes place, the consistency of their communication
behavior suggests that they are carrying out a systematic policy
of noninformation."
It's true, says Dan Wright, head of the Abduction
Transciption Project, begun in the spring of 1992 by the Mutual
UFO Network (MUFON) based in Seguin, Texas, that virtually
every case has small Grays. But unlike Jacobs, he believes the
Grays are by no means the only aliens around. "Always keep in
mind," states Wright, "that we are dealing with multiple groups
of entities who work together."
BeyondLooks
When there's more than a single entity involved in an
encounter, the division of labor among the aliens (and alien
types) becomes apparent. We get a glimpse of their social orga
nization, their personalities, and their culture.
The most distinctive role observed in abduction accounts is
that of the leader. This position is usually characterized by the
entity's tall stature, some matter of distinctive dress—a cape per
haps—as well as certain behavioral qualities. The leader is fre
quently heard barking what seem to be orders at the other
beings. He may even be distinguished by skin color. Wright notes
that usually the darker the entity's skin tone, the higher his status.
The leader usually maintains communications with the
human captive and has the closest relationship with him or her.
Sometimes the leader also performs the more intricate medical
procedures, as well as extremely close-up staring, which is
known as the mindscan. The leader can be any of several alien
types: insectoid, reptilian, even a darker colored Gray. If the
leader is not the medical examiner, then this "doctor" has the
second-most-obvious role among the aliens.
125
The only other distinct role is that of the crewman, who
serves as the human escort, the guard, the ship's mechanic, or
the specimen or soil collector. The pilots of the craft pay no
attention to the subjects but attend to the controls exclusively.
These tend to be Grays. For Wright, the Grays are the alien
equivalent of worker bees. The Grays, he believes, are narrowly
programmed. When confronted with unexpected human
actions, they act confused. He thinks the Short Grays are low on
the alien totem pole.
Despite this hierarchy of roles, however, folklorist Bullard
notes that a democratic spirit seems to reign among the crews, as
underlings are sometimes seen challenging their leaders with
impunity. Disputes among the crews have been observed, and
the beings have been seen to display a potential for anxiety and
irritability.
Though the aliens exhibit a wide range of behaviors and
emotions—from caring and humor to fear, surprise, confusion,
sadness, curiosity, violence, and gratitude—for the most part,
notes Bullard, the entities in UFO abductions maintain a clinical
aloofness, a stone-faced lack of concern for their human cap
tives. They are often inconsiderate, unsympathetic, and disre
spectful of humans. Even angry witnesses fail to perturb them.
Occasionally, however, something strikes their curiosity—the
sight of a surgical scar or painted toenails perhaps—and their
emotional temperature rises, if only slightly and momentarily.
This, says Bullard, "bequeaths a vivid impression of strangers in
a strange land, businesslike by training and temperament per
haps, but so new to the oddities of this world that humans were
still full of surprises."
While the entities act without remorse in their examination
of humans, they are otherwise often polite and sometimes even
helpful. In a few instances an entity has acted to protect the
abductee, usually from the rest of the crew. At times they even
appear to be responsible for healing humans of one malady or
another. An entity may on occasion reveal his or her name,
though they are normally quite tight-lipped about themselves.
Yet there is a good deal of suspicion among abductees
regarding just how genuine the goodwill of the aliens really is—
especially if one considers their considerable record of false
prophecies, outright lies, and deliberate deceptions. Most of the
time, however, the entities simply avoid answering their cap
tives' questions. One wonders, notes Bullard, if their behaviors
are not all simply a matter of public relations or mind control.
126
They appear to be highly efficient and work oriented and will
resort to any means at their disposal to manipulate the abductee
into cooperation. But, notes Bullard, quite correctly, "a sense of
shame for exploiting fellow intelligent creatures or tiredness
after a long night's work in an unpleasant environment could
just as easily explain the touchiness we sometimes observe."
W
hereDoTheyCom
eFrom
?WhatDoTheyW
ant?
There are almost as many answers to the question "Where
do they come from?" as there are witnesses. The answers come
straight from the mouths or minds of the aliens themselves and
from what the witnesses report seeing on their otherworldy
journeys. Bullard, once again, has examined this question in
considerable detail. More often than not, he discovered, the
beings will not respond to this question, and even when they do,
the answer is often meaningless or improbable. If the aliens are
to be believed. Earth is being visited by more species than you
can shake a stick at—aliens from Arcturus, emissaries from
Orion, telepaths from the Pleiades, and reptoids from Sirius,
among many, many others.
While at first glance this multiplicity of origins might make
sense, considering the great variety in the beings' physical
appearances, Bullard concludes quite rightly that what they say
about where they are from is just garbage. The answers are
offered obviously only to make the witness think they have an
answer. In fact, most of the information provided by the beings,
notes Bullard, "proves counterfeit and worthless." Their past
predictions of war and mass landings have repeatedly failed to
come true. Their "Earth is in danger" warnings are no different,
or more helpful, than what we hear from environmentalists
every day.
Leaving aside the "where," there is some data to tell us
"what" their world is like. At times there is reference to intelli
gent beings living in domed cities. But most often there is a
recurring reference to a barren planet and its desertlike features,
with signs of devastation pointing to a natural or "alien-made"
disaster. If this information can be trusted, then all is obviously
not well with the aliens. On occasion they have actually said
so—that they are searching for a new planet or that they are
unable to reproduce and need humans for crossbreeding pur
poses.
12 7
Which brings us to, Why are they here? Well, in abduction
cases, the central event is often the examination, with tissue and
other samples being collected from human subjects. "Ankles,
arms, feet, and the inside of the mouth were scraped; nails and
locks of hair were clipped; and incisions or 'scoop'-type gouges
were employed to remove flesh," reports Dan Wright.
Over the last decade, the apparent purpose of the abduction
has dawned on researchers: the production of alien-human
hybrids. The beings claim to want children. That appears to be
their real concern. Nearly half of the subjects in the MUFON
Abduction Transcription Project reported an alien interest in
human reproductive systems and sexuality. "This included,"
notes project coordinator Wright, "harvesting sperm from males
and ova from females, fetus abortion, and moments of sexual
orgasm." Either the aliens cannot have children, or they are try
ing to create better beings through a breeding program with
humans. Or they're just a bunch of sexual perverts.
Patterns
Long before metallic spacecraft and their occupants made
the news, small beings from the otherworld were enshrined in
folklore and mythology. Such creatures are in fact a nearly uni
versal phenomenon. There are German dwarfs, Scandinavian
elves, French lutins, Islamic jinns, Indian devas, Japanese kappas,
Pygmy mbefe, Hawaiian menehune, Cherokee little people, and
Inuit ingnersiut.
But the most familiar diminutive supernatural creatures are
the fairies of Ireland, Scotland, and Wales, who manifest them
selves as a host of species, subspecies, and races, including pix
ies, leprechauns, and brownies. And their parallels to modern
UFO beings extend far beyond size comparisons. The little peo
ple often have large heads and eyes and pale skin, sometimes
live in the sky, work at night, and have an inordinate interest in
reproductive matters, seducing humans and giving birth to their
offspring. "The humanoid," notes Bullard, "is a kind of malicious
fairy in technological trappings."
But there are significant differences as well. Hairlessness is
rare among supernatural creatures, as is the smooth, youthful
look of many of the aliens. Fairies for the most part have an aged,
wrinkled appearance—a look that is rare among aliens. So for
Bullard the fact that humanoids resemble fairies may be more an
128
act of chance than a tapping of the same spot in the psyche.
The look of the aliens has actually been affected somewhat
by time and place. For instance, the Short Gray entity, although
ubiquitous today, was largely absent from the UFO scene prior to
the 1960s. The very earliest reports of entities involved primari
ly humanlike beings. And while the human types in the form of
the blond "Nordics" were once responsible for about a quarter of
the total cases, since the 1960s they have not been quite as com
mon. Similarly, the hairy dwarfs that were reported so frequent
ly in the 1950s are rather infrequent in contemporary accounts.
Author Jenny Randles has noted that prior to 1987, when
Whitley Strieber's Communion and Budd Hopkins's Intruders were
published in England, less than a quarter of the entities reported
in Britain's abduction cases were of the small, bald-headed enti
ties. But after the books appeared there, more than half of the
cases involved the "American standardized alien," as she calls it.
Because American abduction cases get more publicity than any
other such cases, it seems as if the image of the Gray has been
more or less imposed on the rest of the world as the standard
alien type.
Not only has the appearance of the aliens changed over
time, but the type of contacts that have taken place between
humans and aliens is different as well. The earliest contacts were
the simplest. Entities once avoided any encounter or relationship
with humans who caught them unawares. Usually the aliens
would be seen simply fixing their craft or collecting rock, soil, or
water samples. The next stage of alien activity seemed to center
on biological specimens, with dogs and cows drawing most of
their attention. Then suddenly the witnesses themselves became
the focus of the encounters, with medical examinations and sex
ual interests becoming the norm.
Similarly, the alien messages to humankind have changed
over the years. They seem to have adapted to our own changing
worries. In the early days they spouted antinuclear messages;
today they voice more generalized environmental concerns.
Prophetic or all too human? Actually, it's kind of a chicken-or-
the-egg problem. The timing is such that it's difficult to tell
whether human concerns have influenced the alien messages or
whether the alien message presaged our own concerns.
Until the Gray was institutionalized as the prototypical alien
by Hollywood and Madison Avenue, alien types also followed a
distinct geographic distribution. From South America came
reports of small swarthy dwarfs who were fairly aggressive,
129
while from Europe and in particular, England, many reports
were of tall blond blue-eyed beings with a much friendlier dis
position. Meanwhile in North America the standard Short Gray
with its shockingly indifferent disposition predominated. This
once apparent geographical difference among alien types pre
sents a major stumbling block to the reality of UFO extraterres
trials. The phenomenon seems to mold itself to conform to the
culture and time in which it appears. This implies that the
encounters are more likely visions than visitations by extrater
restrials.
ThingsAreNotW
hatTheySeem
There is now widespread suspicion among UFO researchers
that things just aren't what they seem. David Jacobs, as I've
noted, will admit that abductees report a variety of alien types,
but he dismisses them. The only real aliens, he says, are the Gray
alien. First of all, he argues, the vast majority of accounts in the
United States are of those small Grays. Second, he says, aliens
will plant false memories of themselves in the minds of
abductees, and anything other than a Gray is very probably an
incorrect memory. Third, abductees sometime confabulate, and
improper questioning by the hypnotist may also lead to an erro
neous description of the aliens.
Though I cannot fault Jacobs's description of the Gray type,
I cannot agree with his conclusion that they are the only "real"
alien beings. In fact, it's possible to use Jacobs's own arguments
regarding alien memory control and eyewitness confabulation to
argue that the Gray itself is but a cover for the aliens' real
appearance. The image of the little Gray has become so ingrained
in our culture with movies such as Close Encounters of the Third
Kind that witnesses experiencing an encounter with an alien
would quite naturally tend to see creatures in this mold, even if
they actually are not.
So widespread is this image of the little Gray humanoid that
researchers tend not to mention the "weirdos" that are reported
to them anymore—the seven-foot-tall lizardlike creatures or the
hairy troll-like creatures, for instance. This self-selection process
tends to homogenize the types of beings investigators report and
the public hears about. John Carpenter, a social worker in
Missouri who has heard many encounter cases, admits quite
readily that researchers relegate the other types of aliens to what
130
he calls a "bulging gray basket." A few years ago Carpenter noted
that he had 10 cases of seven-foot lizard-type beings, and none
of the witnesses had ever heard of such a type before their own
encounters. Can we hide them any longer, he asks?
Suspicions about what the aliens really look like have
haunted UFO researchers for years. Some think that the human
-looking entities, such as the blond "Nordics," might actually be
screen memories imposed by the aliens. Behind the mentally
imposed human mask lies the actual alien face, they say, though
what the real underlying face looks like might be difficult to
uncover. In one case, a witness told California psychologist
Richard Boylan that she had encountered a "spaceman." When he
invited her to look closely at the face of the "human" spaceman,
she replied, "Oh my! It's not human after all. It's one of those
Grays." But when he then suggested that she look closely at the
face of the Gray, she realized that the Gray was actually a reptoid.
The real nature of these aliens is obviously quite elusive.
One case in particular drives the point home. It took place on the
night of May 30, 1974, in South Africa. When asked by the hyp
notist what the aliens looked like, the witness replied, "They
looked how I wanted them to look."
Evidence
When it comes to aliens, there is little certainty. Especially
since there is no solid evidence that these UFO occupants are
really extraterrestrial beings. We are the ones who claim that
they are. We want them to be extraterrestrial. All of us: witness
es and skeptics alike.
"I would love it if there were aliens here," said Carl Sagan at
a news conference in 1994, "even if they are a little short, sullen,
grumpy, and sexually preoccupied [But] people make mis
takes, people misapprehend natural phenomena, people look for
attention, money, or fame. People sometimes experience alter
native states of consciousness—hallucinations are very common
in all human beings, including normal people. And with that as
the background, to really believe one of these cases you need
really good physical evidence. And there is none."
That's true, of course. All we have are the stories we tell each
other of those we have seen with our own eyes and call extrater
restrials. But for many of us, that's enough.
131
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Many people graciously contributed materials and ideas to
this book. First and foremost among them is my friend Larry W.
Bryant, who has nourished and sustained my interest in the
UFO subject for three decades. Special thanks also to Loren
Coleman for his help in tweaking my classification system, cate
gorizing some of the more puzzling cases, and otherwise keeping
me as zoologically correct as possible, considering the material;
any faults that remain, however, are strictly my own.
Richard Heiden went above and beyond the call of duty by
thoroughly searching his collection of that excellent journal
Flying Saucer Review* and providing me with the original pub
lished reports on which I have based many of the case descrip
tions in this book. Antonio Huneeus and Tom Benson were also
kind enough to provide me with information I needed, even
overnight in one case, to make a few last-minute corrections to
my manuscript.
David George Gordon deserves a tip of the hat for unknow
ingly providing me with the inspiration for this field guide, and
another goes to Thomas Bullard for his enormous, and enor
mously entertaining, analysis of UFO abduction cases. His work
helped me get started on the selection of cases for this field
guide, though I did not restrict myself by any means to abduc
tion cases. And Victoria Lacas (now Alexander) deserves thanks,
if for nothing else than for introducing me to Bullard's work
many years ago.
I am also grateful to the many UFO researchers and writers
whose work provided the foundation of this book, and I applaud
the witnesses themselves for being courageous enough to come
forward with their stories in the face of inevitable ridicule. I
should also point out that many of the illustrations in this book
are based either on sketches produced by the witnesses them
selves or on drawings made by artists who worked in conjunc
tion with the witnesses to reproduce what they had seen.
Finally I would like to thank Budd Hopkins, who in my
many years of writing about UFOs has always been helpful,
informative, and kind, even though we haven't always seen eye
to eye on this wonderfully mysterious subject.
132
BIBLIOGRAPHY
(These references mainly support the Introduction and
Afterword of this book, though they served as well to supple
ment the specific sources listed in the Field Guide descriptions.)
Banchs, Roberto E. and Oscar Adolfo Uriondo. "Idees Critiques
sur la Classification de Jader U. Pereira," Phenomenes Spatiaux
37 (September 1973): pp. 30-31.
Barker, Gray. They Knew Too Much About Flying Saucers. New York:
Tower, 1967.
133
Jacobs, David M. Secret Life: Firsthand Accounts of UFO Abductions.
New York: Simon & Schuster, 1992.
Keel, John A. The Complete Guide to Mysterious Beings. New York:
Doubleday, 1994.
Keel, John A. UFOs: Operation Trojan Horse. New York: Putnam, 1970.
134
1
CASE INDEXbydeat
November 25, 1896 Lodi, California 66
July 4, 1947 Roswell, New Mexico 22
August 14, 1947 Villa Santina, Italy 38
May 15, 1951 Salzburg, Austria 34
July 1951 United States 110
September 24, 1951 Orland Park, Illinois 86
September 12, 1952 Flatwoods, West Virginia 56
September 10, 1954 Quarouble, Nord, France 104
November 1, 1954 Cennina, Arezzo, Italy 24
November 28, 1954 Caracas, Venezuela 74
August 21, 1955 Kelly, Kentucky 84
August 22, 1955 Riverside, California 120
October 15, 1957 Sao Francisco de Sales, Minas
Gerais, Brazil 28
December 16, 1957 Old Saybrook, Connecticut 106
January 1958 Niagara Falls, New York 76
December 20, 1958 Domesten, Kristianstad, Sweden 116
September 19, 1961 Lancaster, New Hampshire 30
August 28, 1963 Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais,
Brazil 54
November 16, 1963 Hythe, Kent, England 94
October 23, 1965 Long Prairie, Minnesota 100
January 25, 1967 South Ashburnham, Massachusetts 88
November 2, 1967 Ririe, Idaho 36
December 3, 1967 Ashland, Nebraska 20
July 31, 1968 La Plaine des Cafres,
Reunion Island 40
May 4, 1969 Bebedouro, Minas Gerais, Brazil 44
January 7, 1970 Imjarvi, Mikkeli, Finland 48
August 19, 1970 Bukit Mertajam, Penang, Malaysia 50
August 17 (or 31), 1971 Palos Verdes Estates, California 114
August 26, 1972 Allagash Waterway, Maine 32
August 28, 1972 Bahia Blanca, Buenos Aires,
Argentina 26
October 11, 1973 Pascagoula, Mississippi 60
October 25, 1973 Greensburg, Pennsylvania 70
A Friday, 1973 (or 1974) Cooksville, Maryland 90
October 25, 1974 Rawlins, Wyoming 64
October 27, 1974 Aveley, Essex, England 72
135
Early December 1974 Frederic, Wisconsin 78
Summer 1975 La Junta, Colorado 18
November 12, 1976 Badajoz, Spain 118
January 27, 1977 Prospect, Kentucky 102
February 24, 1977 Langenargen, Baden-Württemberg,
Germany 42
September 15, 1977 Paciencia, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil 108
December 6, 1978 Marzano, Genoa, Italy 80
January 4, 1979 Rowley Regis, West Midlands,
England 92
July 25, 1979 Turis, Valenica, Spain 46
November 9, 1979 Livingston, Lothian, Scotland 98
July 1983 Mount Vernon, Missouri 82
May 29, 1986 Santa Rosa, La Pampa, Argentina 58
September 27, 1989 Voronezh, Russia 52
August 8, 1993 Belgrave, Victoria, Australia 62
136
WHO ARE THEY?
S in c e t h e la te 18 0 0 s , th e re h a ve b e e n n u m e ro u s d o c u m e n te d
r e p o r t s o f h u m a n e n c o u n t e r s w i t h e x t r a t e r r e s t r i a l b e i n g s . In t h is
u n iq u e a n d c o m p r e h e n s iv e v o lu m e - t h e f ir s t fie ld g u id e e v e r
d e v o t e d t o e x t r a t e r r e s t r i a l s r e p o r t e d in U F O in c id e n ts - s c ie n c e
w r i t e r P a t r i c k H u y g h e o f f e r s a fa s c in a t in g o v e r v i e w o f a lie n t y p e s
w i t n e s s e d t h r o u g h o u t t h e p a s t c e n t u r y . E a c h e v e n t is d e s c r i b e d in
d e t a i l , b a s e d o n e y e w i t n e s s a c c o u n t s , a n d is a c c o m p a n i e d b y a